Just a moment for appreciation Dave I started watching you 10 yeas ago , now I have a Bsc in industrial electronics Master in electrical engineering, and I am the head of the firmware development in my company. Just I want to say thank you 😃
I’ll join in the chorus… I started watching around the time you were in double digit episodes, watched everything, and retrained myself from SE to also knowing electronic product design. You have been the single most important teacher I had in that aside from datasheets and app notes 😁 Now I’m Head of “Product Development” for an interesting company developing connected sensors for improving insulation. I’m really glad to see you’re doing more of these classic educational videos again, hopefully another generation will learn from them (and I sure still am too)!
Dave was one of the guys that revived my passion for electronics (most credits go to him). At 50 years of age I have decided to finally finish my bachelor in electronics and also switched jobs. Went from repairing trains (mainly electric traction) to tester/faultfinder in a company that produces secondary radar systems (civil and military) with possibility to become test/installations engineer when I finish my studies.
This type of video is my absolute favourite on this channel. It's a great time to live in to have such a variety of highly skilled people teaching useful skills with no paywall.
Congratulations as a retired industrial electronics engineer that spen 36 years in industrial instrumentation, automation and control you got a great experience ahead of you
I remember when my first analog electronics course in university covered Darlington pairs, then later covered ideal and real opamps. We were a little confused when a subsequent class started with a Darlington pair drawn on the board. Our instructor replaced the transistors with opamps, then asked us to "discuss the implications" (our professor's favorite phrase). We discussed not only buffer amps, then went on to add feedback to make logarithmic amps, followed by homework that had us modeling the whole thing in Spice, down to the internal transistors. In the lab that accompanied the course, the corresponding project started with a box of "random" opamps and transistors (along with a standard kit of resistors, caps and inductors), then tasked us to make circuits meeting particular specifications for gain, power, bandwidth and noise using only the parts in the box. That really opened our eyes to the power of working with "what's at hand" when meeting a need, and, more importantly, realizing when those parts CAN'T do the job. Many of the specs had multiple successful implementation paths using those parts, and the "winner" was based on minimal parts count. The only thing missing was having prices on the parts, to force us to decide which made more sense to take to production. But the professor did call it a "hands-on theory course", so prices would have been a "distraction" as they don't map to theory!
@@SoonerRoadie It was intended to be tough, to weed out folks lacking math skills and/or lacking the ability to rapidly grasp and apply theory. I would have totally failed had I not just come from being a US Navy technician, where I understood all the fundamentals and had good lab skills, needing only the theory behind them and the math.
Great video. It does often cause instability (oscillation) which has to be compensated externally. It would be great to see a video explaining different ways to stabilize amplifier circuits and how to calculate component values (resistors and capacitors) for the compensation network.
Old comment but putting a low pass filter in the feedback path would make the problem far worse. Often the solution is the opposite, you use dominant pole compensation on the inner Amp to artificially reduce its gbwp until the system has adequate phase margin. Miller compensation is probably the approach I see most often.
@@esven9263 I didn't mention "low pass", I wrote "compensation". A lead ompensation circuit (capacitor in parallel with feedback resistor) will improve stability. www.ti.com/lit/an/sloa020a/sloa020a.pdf
Dave, you are amongst the very few who dont spread the ads plague. It's rotting the whole YT from the inside out. When I hear: "and our sponsor today PCB-YaaaY" I want to throw my PC out of the window. Huge respect!
Dave, these fundamentals videos are the absolute best! So much better than trying to decipher textbooks. Thanks so much for uploading these. I'm learning tonnes of things I didn't know, and filling in gaps in things I did know. Really appreciate your time.
Long, long ago, when I took electronics in college, we had to design a low noise, very high gain circuit for one of our last projects. Our teacher loved to make assumptions about ideal Op Amps when explaining things in class and encouraged us to use them when appropriate when designing circuits. I felt pretty smart coming up with this same Idea using 3 amplifier circuits in series treated as an ideal Op Amp to then use to get the results I was aiming for with a fraction of the math to get the design to perform as expected.
Loved the calculator debuts on the whiteboard! Also, at 21:40 the THD was terrible without the composite configuration, you could even see it on the scope!
A very common amplifier, yet often totally hidden inside a package as well, with most opamps being made up of them as well internally. A good explanation of why you want the gains, and the closing of feedback loops as well, so as to get the desired performance, plus that you can mix different types of amplifier as well.
Thanks for those type of videos. I know, they don't create as much revenue as other formats, but they are pure gold for the really interested viewers! Love the increasing calculator size as well! :-D
I was pleased to see a HP 41C calculator make a cameo in this video, since there's still one on my desk. (But then it turned into a Sharp 😯Sacrilege!) This composite amplifier trick was taught to me by a Hewlett-Packard colleague about 35 years ago. There are excellent op amps today with both precision and a decent amount of bandwidth; back then, one often had to be more clever to achieve one's performance goals. Sometimes it takes frequency-dependent feedback paths to keep everything stable.
Thank you so much for this 'basics' video. Great, that you did it on that abstract / practical level, not too much details or variants, and not too high flying, so that everybody could catch the idea and advantages. Myself, I was very much fascinated of those amplifiers, when I did my first job @19 in the Airforce lab in 1980/1982.. most hp, FLUKE, Philips multimeters had one or several composite amplifiers of all kinds (in constrast to only a linear OpAmp). At that time, they consisted of discrete components, like vaccum tubes in combination with optical choppers, or a double FET and a 741 for the AC path, plus a capacitor coupled FET chopper path for the DC path. In the volt-nuts section, we discussed the classic null detectors, like the Fluke 845AB/AR, which also has this composite design.. If I find the PCBs, I'll post pictures of the PM2524 discrete chopper and A/D converter, which I had designed from the schematics. Great stuff. Let's see if it still works and how it performs after 40 years.
Watched this just in case there were some gold nuggets, and it immediately reminded me of one of my first “deep dive” technical discussions at my first job. My boss could not see the difference between cascaded and compound amplifiers (we needed something similar to your DC precision example). In the end I sneakily added additional footprints to support both configurations and assembled both options. The guy could not believe the difference when we tested them, he even accused me of cheating to make him look bad. Luckily it took all of 5min for our in-company “guru” to side with me!
This is the kind of content I love from you! That was VERY clear and well presented (loved the changing calculators too). I've gotten away from watching this channel for a long time because the signal-to-noise ratio had declined a lot (in my view anyway). But stuff like this will draw me in every time. I gotta go look through your catalog and see what I've missed now.
Dave, your teaching skills and the information you give is so invaluable that I wouldn't be able to repay you🙏🏻 Not that I'd be willing to pay you money but I wouldn't be able to repay you🙏🏻
Great video. You covered something very interesting and useful that will certainly be of use. We need more of videos like this, were you not only explain how it works but also build and show it on a simple breadboard that any electronics enthousiast can reproduce at home.
Yep, 100% agreed. Dave has lost his way, especially over the past few years. Didn't help that he started multiple channels and then puts the same kind of content randomly on them to ensure that viewers have no way of knowing where to look.
@@johncoops6897 Have you considered the possibility that he is tired of saying the same thing over and over again to us morons, and not making much money from that??? Have you watched all of his older videos, as well?
@@nameredacted1242 - of course, and it's Dave's choice if he chases the algorithm instead of producing the quality content thet made him successful in the first place. I'm a long term subscriber end have watched his old videos. I use them as reference material. I don't bother with his boring newer stuff, or his other channels with duplicated end diluted content. Take a read down the comments here and see how many people are congratulating him for publishing something decent after so long. I am one of hundreds...
@@johncoops6897 Have you considered that YT makes it impossible for honest and intelligent content producers to stay on top of the algorithm? If SSSl🌶t gets ten billion views for free for her "reaction videos", and Dave has to take a chunk out of his life to work for ten cents, it very quickly gets tiring and pointless to try to stay ahead of Shorts sl🌶ts on this platform.
I found a national semiconductor paper when I was doing a small headphone amp. Not knowing the. what Dave is talking about here I replicated the circuit and it was awsome. No DC drift and good low noise application. A good input amp and an higher current output buffer in this configuration, two resistors to set the gain and a decent power supply you get a really good amp. Thanks Dave
Same basic principle as using an op amp to take a diode's forward voltage drop out of the equation. I always enjoy the little Easter eggs on your whiteboard tray.
This was super helpful! Would have been more helpful a few months ago, but never too late to learn. THis is one of those situations where knowing the terminology to search for more details was all I really needed. Thanks!
As a young designer starting my career during the pandemic, I learned to use the most common, universal components whenever possible. Never use a specific bespoke part when a generic one will do. If Digikiey stocks less than 5,000, stay away!
Well done. I have designed some analog circuits in my life, including some that went into consumer products, and my only real experience with "Composite" amplifiers is in analog filters. I found this video interesting because I have "Cascaded" (put in series) Op Amps on many occasions- usually in an effort to get good gain without adding any more noise than nesc., and also- obviously, sending the output signals through some kind of buffer/line driver- like everyone else does. I have not given building some of these designs as "Composite" before... but I will do so for the next time.... see what I come up with. Thanks again.
Fantastic gems of wisdom! Thank you. One thing that composite amplifiers cannot fix is quiescent current draw. I'm sure there are others but that gives to mind
Awesome, this is so refreshing and from a personal point of view couldn't be better timed as I'm over microcontrollers and coming home to where my heart is Analogue Electronics! proper electronics none of that Arduino rubbish. However there's a problem and thats where you come in Dave as it turns out I have forgotten more than care to admit here so any analogue stuff I will gobble up but keep the math to an appropriate (low) level as I know that I am still shit. I might just start you opamp stuff from the beginning if I remember rightly it should be required reading. Another good teacher like yourself IMHO is Prof Fiore anyhow cheers.
Your video and comments about the lack of info in books reminded me of something I read years ago. Yes, The Art of Electronics has a fair bit on the subject...I just checked!! Mind you the trilogy of Art of books are the absolute best on the subject of electronics that ever has been! Great video, by the way.
Hi, Dave. Great tutorial, I really apprecaite you making these! You mention the possibility of having to add some compensation to the loop. I've tried to follow Bob Pease's chapter on feedback loop compensation but it was aimed at more advanced EE's than me and most of it went over my head, but I'm fascinated by the subject. I know it would be a bugger trying to put together a practical example circuit that needs compensating, but I would love to see you do a tute on this subject.
These 'tutorial' type videos are the reason I started watching your channel many years ago with the 34063 . 👍One day if you up to it please do one explaining where the energy goes if you have an off grid inverter MPPT controller that is fed by a solar panel and the output ( load ) is far smaller than the input power + the battery is fully charged . The panel is in direct sunlight - All I can think is that the output which is ' throttled by the MPPT' must then be dissipated as heat by the panel ? due to conservation of energy .
Seems like this is the fundamental building block for an audio channel strip on a sound console. High-precision preamp input, high-power bus drive output, with a bunch of adjustable filtering intentionally mangling the link between the two. Neat.
Excellent video. btw, I have that Casio fx calc that appears at 10:22...my wife's grandfather gave it to me back in '86 when I went back to college. He flew dive bomber in the Battle of Coral Sea. I still use it. Daily.
I recommend looking at the Application Note of Jim Williams on Composite Amplifiers. There are number of great circuits Dave hasen't covered in this video
It nice that you are giving basic tutorials, but if our system of education is graduating engineers and designers and they don't know about this, we are all in very big trouble!
I have done the composite amplifier thing 3 op-amps deep to get high gain at high frequencies and a low offset. Opamp 1 = low offset and low noise, over compensated and inverting pin to (-) input of compensated via resistor.. Opamp 2 = darn fast opamp (+) input goes to the (-) input of composite and (-) input controlled by 1st stage's output Opamp 3 = Extremely fast inverting output of opamp2 to make the final output. For a step input it got settled in a big hurry but the offset was under 100uV
Small timegap in between the videos, perfect timing for me fiddling around with OpAmps currently. Are you refreshing your microamp board again ;-) (Edit, this fits to the capacity multiplier topic)
Like shown in the Video as I understand it, OpAmp 1 has to be able to take the Full Output Voltage. How would you go about it if you need higher Output Voltages? 🤔🤔
I think we ware taught something like this in uni, here in Romania I don't remember well, because back then I didn't really understood it. May have been a language barrier, cause I was always interested in electronics, but Romanian isn't my native language, but now that I watched this I start to remember...
Hello there Dave, this video was great. It got me thinking. If you put out a video series that was like "the beginner idiot's (yes I mean you Asday) practical guide to electronics" with each video being your answer to last month's project, some concept introduced, MAYBE some theory, then a description of a project relying on that concept, and a shopping list of parts, I would... Well I'm not going to finish that sentence. Even better if you stocked the BoM on your website with shipping to England and maybe a 50-100% markup in price. You could even follow the HelloFresh model and make it a subscription service thing so each month a bundle of components turn up like it's Christmas and then you go watch the video. Kinda like Ben Eater's stuff, but with more of a focus on "here is a specific concept that you will be able to take elsewhere and use in your circuit design" and less on "here is one specific project that needs a disparate multitude of concepts even if it is kinda cool". Maybe even a 300% markup.
Just a moment for appreciation Dave I started watching you 10 yeas ago , now I have a Bsc in industrial electronics Master in electrical engineering, and I am the head of the firmware development in my company. Just I want to say thank you 😃
Awesome to hear, that made my day, thanks.
I’ll join in the chorus… I started watching around the time you were in double digit episodes, watched everything, and retrained myself from SE to also knowing electronic product design. You have been the single most important teacher I had in that aside from datasheets and app notes 😁 Now I’m Head of “Product Development” for an interesting company developing connected sensors for improving insulation.
I’m really glad to see you’re doing more of these classic educational videos again, hopefully another generation will learn from them (and I sure still am too)!
Dave was one of the guys that revived my passion for electronics (most credits go to him).
At 50 years of age I have decided to finally finish my bachelor in electronics and also switched jobs. Went from repairing trains (mainly electric traction) to tester/faultfinder in a company that produces secondary radar systems (civil and military) with possibility to become test/installations engineer when I finish my studies.
This type of video is my absolute favourite on this channel. It's a great time to live in to have such a variety of highly skilled people teaching useful skills with no paywall.
Congratulations as a retired industrial electronics engineer that spen 36 years in industrial instrumentation, automation and control you got a great experience ahead of you
I love the fact that the previous episode in the series was published 10 years ago.
I honestly didn't know that when I shot this, could have sworn it was like 4-5 years at most.
Interestingly, i unsubbed a few years ago due to the busted videos. And this popped into my feed. Perfect algorithm.
@@TheBodgybrothers clearly this series was produced for you! 😄
I remember when my first analog electronics course in university covered Darlington pairs, then later covered ideal and real opamps. We were a little confused when a subsequent class started with a Darlington pair drawn on the board. Our instructor replaced the transistors with opamps, then asked us to "discuss the implications" (our professor's favorite phrase). We discussed not only buffer amps, then went on to add feedback to make logarithmic amps, followed by homework that had us modeling the whole thing in Spice, down to the internal transistors.
In the lab that accompanied the course, the corresponding project started with a box of "random" opamps and transistors (along with a standard kit of resistors, caps and inductors), then tasked us to make circuits meeting particular specifications for gain, power, bandwidth and noise using only the parts in the box. That really opened our eyes to the power of working with "what's at hand" when meeting a need, and, more importantly, realizing when those parts CAN'T do the job.
Many of the specs had multiple successful implementation paths using those parts, and the "winner" was based on minimal parts count. The only thing missing was having prices on the parts, to force us to decide which made more sense to take to production. But the professor did call it a "hands-on theory course", so prices would have been a "distraction" as they don't map to theory!
That sounds like a great course and a great professor.
@@SoonerRoadie, ditto. I wish I'd had that class and prof. But now I have Dave, and I can't argue about the cost of tuition.
that must have been donkeys years ago. hadnt heard or such classes any recent time and i HAD a seriously old fashioned prof at Electronics 😮
@@urugulu1656 Yup! It was 1982, at UC San Diego.
@@SoonerRoadie It was intended to be tough, to weed out folks lacking math skills and/or lacking the ability to rapidly grasp and apply theory. I would have totally failed had I not just come from being a US Navy technician, where I understood all the fundamentals and had good lab skills, needing only the theory behind them and the math.
Great video. It does often cause instability (oscillation) which has to be compensated externally. It would be great to see a video explaining different ways to stabilize amplifier circuits and how to calculate component values (resistors and capacitors) for the compensation network.
Yes please! I've never understood how to do the compensation
@@hugofrisk1889 Uhm by lowpassing the feedback to attenuate the oscillation frequency?
Old comment but putting a low pass filter in the feedback path would make the problem far worse. Often the solution is the opposite, you use dominant pole compensation on the inner Amp to artificially reduce its gbwp until the system has adequate phase margin. Miller compensation is probably the approach I see most often.
@@esven9263 I didn't mention "low pass", I wrote "compensation". A lead ompensation circuit (capacitor in parallel with feedback resistor) will improve stability.
www.ti.com/lit/an/sloa020a/sloa020a.pdf
One of the best electronics channel on UA-cam, thanks Dave
Dave, you are amongst the very few who dont spread the ads plague. It's rotting the whole YT from the inside out.
When I hear: "and our sponsor today PCB-YaaaY" I want to throw my PC out of the window.
Huge respect!
Thanks. Turned them all down for 14 years. Many requests a week.
Finally Dave found the way back to the topic that everyone loves! Dave you are so welcome back! Thanks!
Somehow I feel that he will do an "Oh A Squirrel" 🐿 and jump back to his recent (lost) ways.
Thank you for bringing this series back. Commenting for the algorithm.
Dave, these fundamentals videos are the absolute best! So much better than trying to decipher textbooks. Thanks so much for uploading these. I'm learning tonnes of things I didn't know, and filling in gaps in things I did know. Really appreciate your time.
That’s the kind of video I mostly miss from this channel! I hope you keep doing them Dave!
I love all the different calculators on the white board between the edits. Great video. Bug thumbs up from me
Long, long ago, when I took electronics in college, we had to design a low noise, very high gain circuit for one of our last projects. Our teacher loved to make assumptions about ideal Op Amps when explaining things in class and encouraged us to use them when appropriate when designing circuits. I felt pretty smart coming up with this same Idea using 3 amplifier circuits in series treated as an ideal Op Amp to then use to get the results I was aiming for with a fraction of the math to get the design to perform as expected.
It's so great to have this channel that teaches you things no one else talks about!❤
Loved the calculator debuts on the whiteboard! Also, at 21:40 the THD was terrible without the composite configuration, you could even see it on the scope!
A very common amplifier, yet often totally hidden inside a package as well, with most opamps being made up of them as well internally. A good explanation of why you want the gains, and the closing of feedback loops as well, so as to get the desired performance, plus that you can mix different types of amplifier as well.
Yes, totally forgot to mention that in the video. I knew there was something I wanted to add.
Thanks for those type of videos. I know, they don't create as much revenue as other formats, but they are pure gold for the really interested viewers! Love the increasing calculator size as well! :-D
I was pleased to see a HP 41C calculator make a cameo in this video, since there's still one on my desk. (But then it turned into a Sharp 😯Sacrilege!) This composite amplifier trick was taught to me by a Hewlett-Packard colleague about 35 years ago. There are excellent op amps today with both precision and a decent amount of bandwidth; back then, one often had to be more clever to achieve one's performance goals. Sometimes it takes frequency-dependent feedback paths to keep everything stable.
Thank you so much for this 'basics' video. Great, that you did it on that abstract / practical level, not too much details or variants, and not too high flying, so that everybody could catch the idea and advantages.
Myself, I was very much fascinated of those amplifiers, when I did my first job @19 in the Airforce lab in 1980/1982.. most hp, FLUKE, Philips multimeters had one or several composite amplifiers of all kinds (in constrast to only a linear OpAmp). At that time, they consisted of discrete components, like vaccum tubes in combination with optical choppers, or a double FET and a 741 for the AC path, plus a capacitor coupled FET chopper path for the DC path. In the volt-nuts section, we discussed the classic null detectors, like the Fluke 845AB/AR, which also has this composite design..
If I find the PCBs, I'll post pictures of the PM2524 discrete chopper and A/D converter, which I had designed from the schematics. Great stuff. Let's see if it still works and how it performs after 40 years.
Thanks Dave. This is a very useful short class in practical op-amp circuit designs that was never well covered in my text books.
Watched this just in case there were some gold nuggets, and it immediately reminded me of one of my first “deep dive” technical discussions at my first job.
My boss could not see the difference between cascaded and compound amplifiers (we needed something similar to your DC precision example).
In the end I sneakily added additional footprints to support both configurations and assembled both options. The guy could not believe the difference when we tested them, he even accused me of cheating to make him look bad.
Luckily it took all of 5min for our in-company “guru” to side with me!
A cool and interesting lesson, and it's nice to see the simple-and-elegant breadboard from the mailbag in action :).
The fanboys wanted the jumperless breadboard!
@@EEVblog kids these days, always wanna have the newfangled stuff... LOL
*_Hello from Ukraine. Live and learn. This video was very interesting for me. Thank you, you are doing a great job!_*
Damn.. those CALCULATORS on the board got a quick evolution or devolution along the video! 😂
Negative feedback has got to be my favorite principle in engineering. Like magic.
This is the kind of content I love from you! That was VERY clear and well presented (loved the changing calculators too). I've gotten away from watching this channel for a long time because the signal-to-noise ratio had declined a lot (in my view anyway). But stuff like this will draw me in every time. I gotta go look through your catalog and see what I've missed now.
Dave, your teaching skills and the information you give is so invaluable that I wouldn't be able to repay you🙏🏻 Not that I'd be willing to pay you money but I wouldn't be able to repay you🙏🏻
Great video. You covered something very interesting and useful that will certainly be of use.
We need more of videos like this, were you not only explain how it works but also build and show it on a simple breadboard that any electronics enthousiast can reproduce at home.
This is really all that you should be doing on YT, given complete lack of such material, at this high quality, on YT.
eevblog YT now is all about fear of staying relevant and twisted viewership statistics.
Yep, 100% agreed. Dave has lost his way, especially over the past few years. Didn't help that he started multiple channels and then puts the same kind of content randomly on them to ensure that viewers have no way of knowing where to look.
@@johncoops6897 Have you considered the possibility that he is tired of saying the same thing over and over again to us morons, and not making much money from that???
Have you watched all of his older videos, as well?
@@nameredacted1242 - of course, and it's Dave's choice if he chases the algorithm instead of producing the quality content thet made him successful in the first place.
I'm a long term subscriber end have watched his old videos. I use them as reference material. I don't bother with his boring newer stuff, or his other channels with duplicated end diluted content.
Take a read down the comments here and see how many people are congratulating him for publishing something decent after so long. I am one of hundreds...
@@johncoops6897 Have you considered that YT makes it impossible for honest and intelligent content producers to stay on top of the algorithm? If SSSl🌶t gets ten billion views for free for her "reaction videos", and Dave has to take a chunk out of his life to work for ten cents, it very quickly gets tiring and pointless to try to stay ahead of Shorts sl🌶ts on this platform.
I found a national semiconductor paper when I was doing a small headphone amp. Not knowing the. what Dave is talking about here I replicated the circuit and it was awsome. No DC drift and good low noise application. A good input amp and an higher current output buffer in this configuration, two resistors to set the gain and a decent power supply you get a really good amp. Thanks Dave
Neat! I think his t shirts also have compound ultra low fading. 20 years ago perfect black, now uniform grey....
I really appreciate you making this video Dave, I've learnt so much from your channel over the years!!!
Same basic principle as using an op amp to take a diode's forward voltage drop out of the equation.
I always enjoy the little Easter eggs on your whiteboard tray.
I love how the calculators keep changing on the white board.. Great video too.
Always my standby circuit for the difficult input specifications! Good explanation Dave.
This was super helpful! Would have been more helpful a few months ago, but never too late to learn. THis is one of those situations where knowing the terminology to search for more details was all I really needed. Thanks!
I was thinking "How did I miss this blast from the past" when I saw the thumbnail ... new content! And on OP AMPS! Thank you!
As a young designer starting my career during the pandemic, I learned to use the most common, universal components whenever possible. Never use a specific bespoke part when a generic one will do. If Digikiey stocks less than 5,000, stay away!
Thanks
Excellent video, I can never get enough of your opamp videos!
Great video, Dave! Always love these whiteboard explanations of circuits!
Well done. I have designed some analog circuits in my life, including some that went into consumer products, and my only real experience with "Composite" amplifiers is in analog filters. I found this video interesting because I have "Cascaded" (put in series) Op Amps on many occasions- usually in an effort to get good gain without adding any more noise than nesc., and also- obviously, sending the output signals through some kind of buffer/line driver- like everyone else does. I have not given building some of these designs as "Composite" before... but I will do so for the next time.... see what I come up with. Thanks again.
Fantastic gems of wisdom! Thank you.
One thing that composite amplifiers cannot fix is quiescent current draw. I'm sure there are others but that gives to mind
10x Dave! Seeing you in front of that board makes me click immediately! I love your tutorial series, please keep them coming :)
This is the first time for me about composite amplifiers. Very intriguing! Thank you very much!
Awesome, this is so refreshing and from a personal point of view couldn't be better timed as I'm over microcontrollers and coming home to where my heart is Analogue Electronics! proper electronics none of that Arduino rubbish. However there's a problem and thats where you come in Dave as it turns out I have forgotten more than care to admit here so any analogue stuff I will gobble up but keep the math to an appropriate (low) level as I know that I am still shit. I might just start you opamp stuff from the beginning if I remember rightly it should be required reading. Another good teacher like yourself IMHO is Prof Fiore anyhow cheers.
I like such tutorials abouz analogue topics. Pleas keep them up 👍
Awesome explanation. I love this series of videos about electronic theory and how to use it in many applications.
Wow, what a cool trick, worked perfectly in the real example too! Thanks - loved the calculators in the shots :)
Your video and comments about the lack of info in books reminded me of something I read years ago. Yes, The Art of Electronics has a fair bit on the subject...I just checked!! Mind you the trilogy of Art of books are the absolute best on the subject of electronics that ever has been! Great video, by the way.
The main Art of Electronics only has rather small mention of composite amps. The X chapters has a bit more.
The white board vídeos are great! Cheers, Dave!
Big thank you, Dave! Very intelligible and clear
Love the tutorial videos Dave, very enlightening
Nice example and explanation.
Excellent tutorial video. Fantastic channel
Hi, Dave. Great tutorial, I really apprecaite you making these! You mention the possibility of having to add some compensation to the loop. I've tried to follow Bob Pease's chapter on feedback loop compensation but it was aimed at more advanced EE's than me and most of it went over my head, but I'm fascinated by the subject. I know it would be a bugger trying to put together a practical example circuit that needs compensating, but I would love to see you do a tute on this subject.
Hello Dave, can you please make more videos on composite amplifiers? Thanks for this one, love your videos! Learnt alot over the years from them!!!
right when I needed it. greetings from Germany
Liked because of the Pilot G2, my favorite pen of all time
Thanks for sharing! I love learning clever circuit design tricks like this =)
Astonishing!!! Fierce!!! great!!!
This circuit topology reminds me of tube driver & power amp with global negative feedback. Really cool.
Where's the two thumbs up button!? Thanks Dave, I learned something new, awesome!
Great video. Have to check if there were changing calculators in other white board sessions as well. Counted 5 in this one.
These 'tutorial' type videos are the reason I started watching your channel many years ago with the 34063 . 👍One day if you up to it please do one explaining where the energy goes if you have an off grid inverter MPPT controller that is fed by a solar panel and the output ( load ) is far smaller than the input power + the battery is fully charged . The panel is in direct sunlight - All I can think is that the output which is ' throttled by the MPPT' must then be dissipated as heat by the panel ? due to conservation of energy .
Ask yourself "where does the heat go" if you have a 400V DC battery just sitting there...
@@EEVblog I would guess nowhere , as it is just stored chemical potential energy which is only released when connected to a load and current flows.
Absolutely great video, thank you !
Seems like this is the fundamental building block for an audio channel strip on a sound console. High-precision preamp input, high-power bus drive output, with a bunch of adjustable filtering intentionally mangling the link between the two. Neat.
Excellent video. btw, I have that Casio fx calc that appears at 10:22...my wife's grandfather gave it to me back in '86 when I went back to college. He flew dive bomber in the Battle of Coral Sea. I still use it. Daily.
Dave!!! We need a video on star ground too.
Thank you very much.
Very loud noise at 14:28, might be a good idea to just mute for a fraction of a second there to protect viewer's ears.
I think that was the video card file size limit switchover. Too late now, can't edit audio after upload.
Awesome, thank you!
These are often also called nested amplifiers. This term is often used in more scientific papers.
I like your calculators collection 😂👍
I recommend looking at the Application Note of Jim Williams on Composite Amplifiers. There are number of great circuits Dave hasen't covered in this video
It nice that you are giving basic tutorials, but if our system of education is graduating engineers and designers and they don't know about this, we are all in very big trouble!
Awesome explanation
Looks like a good idea for a constant gain overdrive guitar FX. Internal FB can be non-linear and the external one would set the overall gain.
Like you calculators selection
I also had a Casio FX-770P in the 80s. A wonderful programmable calculator. Unfortunately the folding interconnection foil broke in a short time.
Geeee! I feel bad for that A2, you call that poor thing horrible so many times I wonder if it even bothers to operate at all! :))
It knows it is a brute force opamp, just cannot do fine work, so needs the first one to help with that.
Kinda like asking Andre the Giant to repair your Rolex.
In Former times we used the NatSemi LH0002 buffer amplifier.
I remember those and also the LH0033. It was the first time I saw the need for a heat sink on an op-amp.
good tutorial thank you
Wonderful.
Nice job Dave !
I have done the composite amplifier thing 3 op-amps deep to get high gain at high frequencies and a low offset.
Opamp 1 = low offset and low noise, over compensated and inverting pin to (-) input of compensated via resistor..
Opamp 2 = darn fast opamp (+) input goes to the (-) input of composite and (-) input controlled by 1st stage's output
Opamp 3 = Extremely fast inverting output of opamp2 to make the final output.
For a step input it got settled in a big hurry but the offset was under 100uV
Please make more videos on this.
So many calculator's 🙂 Love it...
I love video like these :D
Dave needed half a dozen calculators to work out his R1s + R2s :P
...thanks Dave... i had no idea about composite amps...
Ah, that Casio fx-50F! My first serious calculator. I bought mine in 1990 in Bremen, then West Germany...
Nice.
This is a nice segue to delve into instrumentation amplifiers (aka composite amplifiers on steroids) :)
Small timegap in between the videos, perfect timing for me fiddling around with OpAmps currently.
Are you refreshing your microamp board again ;-)
(Edit, this fits to the capacity multiplier topic)
I think the noise performance of the composite amplifier failed momentarily just after 14:28 🤔. Great educational video as always!
It reminds me the Global Feedback in Analog Audio Amplifiers
Like shown in the Video as I understand it, OpAmp 1 has to be able to take the Full Output Voltage.
How would you go about it if you need higher Output Voltages? 🤔🤔
Would you Dave consider making and example use of this for say a headphone amplifier or some other audio circuit .
Excellent... I missed watching these Tutorials. I always learn something Exciting and New.
I think we ware taught something like this in uni, here in Romania I don't remember well, because back then I didn't really understood it. May have been a language barrier, cause I was always interested in electronics, but Romanian isn't my native language, but now that I watched this I start to remember...
Hello there Dave, this video was great. It got me thinking.
If you put out a video series that was like "the beginner idiot's (yes I mean you Asday) practical guide to electronics" with each video being your answer to last month's project, some concept introduced, MAYBE some theory, then a description of a project relying on that concept, and a shopping list of parts, I would... Well I'm not going to finish that sentence.
Even better if you stocked the BoM on your website with shipping to England and maybe a 50-100% markup in price. You could even follow the HelloFresh model and make it a subscription service thing so each month a bundle of components turn up like it's Christmas and then you go watch the video.
Kinda like Ben Eater's stuff, but with more of a focus on "here is a specific concept that you will be able to take elsewhere and use in your circuit design" and less on "here is one specific project that needs a disparate multitude of concepts even if it is kinda cool".
Maybe even a 300% markup.
I really liked this is this what Technics call new class A seems similar?
Cool. Thanks!