Gwyneth Paltrow Judge Reprimands Terry Sanderson’s Daughter Over Medical Testimony
Вставка
- Опубліковано 23 бер 2023
- The judge overseeing Gwyneth Paltrow’s ski crash trial calmly reprimanded plaintiff Terry Sanderson’s daughter, Shae Herath, for giving medical opinions that she is not qualified to provide. “There’s a lot of medical experts in this case and you are not one of them,” Judge Kent Holmberg said to Herath outside the presence of the jury.
#GwynethPaltrow #SkiTrial #LawAndCrime
STAY UP-TO-DATE WITH THE LAW&CRIME NETWORK:
Watch Law&Crime Network on UA-camTV: bit.ly/3td2e3y
Where To Watch Law&Crime Network: bit.ly/3akxLK5
Sign Up For Law&Crime's Daily Newsletter: bit.ly/LawandCrimeNewsletter
Read Fascinating Articles From Law&Crime Network: bit.ly/3td2Iqo
LAW&CRIME NETWORK SOCIAL MEDIA:
Instagram: / lawandcrime
Twitter: / lawcrimenetwork
Facebook: / lawandcrime
Twitch: / lawandcrimenetwork
TikTok: / lawandcrime
LAW&CRIME NETWORK PODCASTS: lawandcrime.com/podcasts/
SUBSCRIBE TO ALL OF LAW&CRIME NETWORK UA-cam CHANNELS:
Main Channel: / @lawandcrime
Law&Crime Shorts: / @lawandcrimeshorts
Channel B: / @lawandcrimetrials
Channel C: / @lawandcrimebodycam - Розваги
I very much appreciate how gentle and respectful the judge was in this particular video....
The judge was TOO gentle on her!
why?!
@@coastal5228 I haven’t watched the rest of her testimony, so don’t know if she had been repeatedly warned or not already. But this is totally how a judge should speak to a witness (except maybe if they have been warned countless times already, and are deliberately violating rules of evidence). Even law students struggle with rules of evidence and what is opinion vs fact, what is observation etc, and which are and aren’t admissible. So it’s completely expected that a layperson is not going to know the rules of evidence, and need it explained to them. (And we all saw how long it took for johnny depp to grasp the hearsay rule lol).
@@goodgrief1026 yes he is kinda a daddy...
Ths is how all judges are if they're simply explaining a rule. But if a witness is being defiant and disprectful, they'll be set straight or "reprimanded."
I really like this judge he isn't controlling, rude or condescending. He is sensitive to everyone.
I would love for SNL to do a skit on this case with Gwyneth making a surprise to play herself and have Judge Judy playing this judge role. OMG!!! So hilarious
I think the judge handled this very tactfully. Nice.
Wow what a very calming and patient disposition this judge displays when talking to a witness or anyone. Nice to know that exists somewhere.
Yes, this is Utah.
Hajajajaha!!!!
Did you watch the Chandler Halderson and/or the Murdaugh cases? The judges were very similar. Those are just two that come to mind.
That's how a judge, or anyone having authority over others - including parents, should speak when trying to explain an issue or attempting to get a point across. This judge is an exemplary human being.
True. In this case the witness was also very polite about it. Kind of easy to stay calm as the judge in that situation.
I agree, he stands above the rest...Honestly.
He really set a tone in the courtroom.
This isn't a "reprimand." The judge simply clarified the bounds of her testimony. She was not violating court rules or acting out of order as to be "reprimanded."
thank you. the title baited me.
@@playermick-1660 It baited all of us. Pathetic!
That's literally what reprimand means slow one, he's letting her know her place in this case. He basically warned her so no the title isn't "bait."
It’s called admonishing the witness. It can be done gently if appropriate. If the witness doesn’t comply, her testimony can be stricken and the jury instructed to disregard it.
Nor was it addressed to Sanderson’s attorney. What a BS caption!
This trial is so bizarre
very bizzare
And I thought the Depp vs. Heard trial was bizarre 🫤
@@parsoumash -Isn't it amazing what people will do and say when it comes to MONEY ?
Don,t you see that everything in this nation is bizarre. PRAY PEOPLE PRAY, this is just the beginning.
Depp vs Heard was at least informative, especially the psychologist expert witness.
This judge is professional calm, constructive.. and conveys his instructions in such a way that the recipient is receptive
Very respectful instructions. Nothing out of the norm. Some people are so negative they can't see kindness. SAD
This entire case is like a ride in the "legal fun house" where everything is wacky and nutty.
LOL so true!!!
A reflection of our society these days..
@@parsoumash Ugh! for real
Right I been watching it on TV
😂
It’s like a lullaby court hearing. I really do love and appreciate his voice
these daughters are blind to their dad. i wanna hear from jenny
Paltrow is snooty
Marie Antoinette Paltrow;
“Let them eat my candles “
Connie G.
Her face is so tight, she can't smile.
The judge is so awesome - he is so calm, respectful, and firm - I wish all judges were like him
Oh my dad never yelled before and now he does. His life is over. He needs money thatis worth more than his injury fees to fix his problems 😂
This shouldn't even be a case in court.
This shouldn't be televised.
But GP wanted to fight it, as she was either innocent of the allegations or thinks she isn't at fault.
@@VioletJoy just because she was there and there was an accident to doesn't prove guilt.
But, Sanderson couldn't resist the chance that he could make a financial killing on suing this well-heeled celebrity.
well, celebrities have to go to court to show public that they cant just sue. she thinks shes right and doesnt want to pay even to keep it out of coury. thus the $1, and thus the paying for her lawyers
Those daughters were horrible witnesses, they didn't do him any favors. I hope he's better witness
They explained how the brain injury changed his personality.
@@canadianbeef1958 The don't even know his personality, I doubt they have much interaction with him at all.
@@mr.balloffur well that's what they do for a living.
Boy that’s the softest reprimand I’ve ever heard. She must not have gotten brazen with him. :)
Good Judge! Yes avoid the medical terminology cos you know… we’re not doctors!
That is one chilled judge. I am not a Paltrow fan, but I side with her defense, which falls in line with common sense. The Sanderson side appears with many problems and a circus performing leading attorney, Ms. Van Norman.
nah her story has WAY less common sense, are you kidding me? He rode in between her skiis with his body up against her's for a while and then they fell, going slowly? and it was enough for him to break ribs and get a brain injury and lay there not moving? And she still left him there? His story makes much more sense. AND a witness saw it happen and says she is lying.
The injuries prove who hit who, she hit him.
@@pandapower5902exactly, her story is insane.
No kidding. Sanderson saying this was the hardest he had ever been hit when Paltrow weighs about 90 lbs was a hoot
@@canadianbeef1958 LMAO
I hope they pull up a video showing his claim is completely false.
Get Jenny in there and quit asking questions about what she alleges. Ridiculous. Isn’t it hearsay?
She was being reprimanded for acting like a medical expert. When one is being reprimanded it implies that they crossed a boundary.
She’s like a lot of people these days unfortunately, who read psychiatry or neurology articles or attend therapy and start throwing around these labels they hear like it’s a new word they learned at school.
@@ladylee27 exactly
Daughter didn’t seem truthful and was very hostile. I felt like she was being extremely dishonest and disingenuous. Her eyes are scary too.
Why would you choose to use the word "reprimands" when the judge clearly was "advising and clarifying" ~
She won't even shut up when the judge is reprimanding her, such as it is. She is one STRANGE person! It doesn't matter if the attorneys are ok with it if not, the judge has the say so. Smh
Willful and stubborn and unable to listen to anyone. Reminds me that she and Polly are very much like their father in terms of ego and narcissistic behavior.
This whole family is mentally sick!!!! They all need to be admitted to a mental ward.
She was maddening to watch. Constantly asking to repeat questions and answering very condsending
Nah!
Yes she was..
His daughters seem very defensive as well. I'd bet they are both like their dad when it comes to shifting blame. It seems very natural to them.
This witness was the most dishonest. Surprised that Owens did not declare her a "hostile witness." When she said that medical-sounding descriptive of Jenny, she knew exactly what she was doing, IMO. The Team clearly had that put in her script so as to let the jury know that Jenny has some problems and might account for her father's treatment of her.
I agree. Both daughters were dishonest.
Yes, clearly both had been schooled. Families huh!
Tbh, I don't trust the Sanderson's lawyers at all. I know lawyers will try everything to win cases but that team pulled too many stunts. The final rebuttal was a joke. They were desperate and would try anything. The question now is do they know that his version wasn't real and hope there were enough jurors hating on GP to find her at fault.
Can someone explain to me why his daughters are being asked so extensively about his health records. Why do the records not speak for themselves?
One reason could be that the defense is trying to say that Terry's symptoms after his head injury were the same before the accident. Maybe to discredit his claims. Just my opinion
because the daughters r covering for him
@@ASparklingFlame They are just getting so personal. Like his prostate I think, why would his daughters need to testify about that. I get it to an extent but it goes on and on. Thanks for responding.
@@nonsense289 Maybe I haven't watched all the trial but they have an eyewitness. Are they claiming that Sanderson and Ramone set out to play Paltrow? I don't get the point why Ramone would say he saw her crash into him, if he really didn't see that. Unless like I said it was all a trap.
@@sherriwells5886 if you're a popular person, a public person, your lawyers will do whatever they can to make the other party look responsible. If some unrelated witness saw this happen, his testimony should count a lot. Any witness should count.
The unprofessionalism of the legal teams in the US is concerning. Given the costs involved representing i am shocked by how in many instances they cannot even speak or direct cohesively.
What was crazy was that after this instruction, Paltrow's attorney asked numerous questions about her father's medical situation. If she wasn't allowed to even reference her sister's neurodiverse mentality, (to put her behavior in context) why is it acceptable for her to be expected to offer medical testimony about her father's health issues? Seems like a double standard.
why not she is showing the whole world she isn't right up there. Accept you responsibility as a witness or stay away from the courts
there is to much self victimization going around in this world about time humans grow some balls and be honest instead of always trying to chase the $
Because her sister didn't sue someone and make mental/physical issues part of the case. Her father did.
Because she is not a 'Medical Expert'. The Judge is right. She is not qualified to use terms that can only be used by experts, doctors etc.
It's because her father went to the hospital and came out with a MEDICAL DIAGNOSIS THAT IS ON THE RECORD.
Her sister she was just making medical crap up about like she "knew" what was going on.
Why did Gwyneth leave while the judge was talking??
she can't be bothered, she's the Queen don't ya know. I love the way she just glided out of the courtroom🤩I'm star struck😅
That would be because she is far too important and above the little people! AKA narcissist.
Because it was lunch break. She didn't need to be there for the judge instructing the witness. Her counsel was there. The jury had already left.
Would she be getting sued if she weren’t a celebrity??
@@amandaloizeaux9082 Probably.
This was more of an instruction than a reprimand.
I wanna know what's on that link they were able to find. Finally!!!
I like how she asked the lawyer "what was your name again?" As if the lawyer is beneath her.
Who? The daughter Shey? Gwynnie did exactly the same thing. 🤦🏻♀️
@@thinkingallowed7042GP said that to Sanderson's female attorney.
Was that before or after the lawyer says to GP “actually you’re not that small?” Lol
Certainly sounds that way, she probably name/title checks more than we know.
Very condescending. Bet the jury did not like that at all.
Quit asking questions about what other people said or how they felt. Ugh!!
He said he didn't want her to diagnose.
Because she's not a Doctor.
And because Medical language, in her testimony didn't sound like an everyday observation.
I don’t understand (or maybe I DO) why this person has taken so long to to make a claim against Gweneth Paltrow?
Money really is the root…. Of all evil
👍
If the plaintiff loses his lawsuit. He can thank his daughter. GP should cut her a check for her help ...like wow! What a hot mess she was
Agree
She needs mental evaluation too 👀
If he loses the lawsuit he can blame his own stupidity for ever thinking he had a case over an incident that he caused
@@christopher7763 ...I'm not a GP fan but this trial is a waste of time and good money. The daughter is awful. Obvious she is not being truthful. I hope GP wins and I wish she had counter sued for her time and expenses.
I feel for the sisters but their plan was to make Gwyneth's very kind lawyer repeat questions over & over again and to never ever reply yes or no! Pretty annoying at this point!
And it was very obnoxious. But, Owens got her, or rather she stepped into it at the end when she said that she withheld correct information on her deposition because her lawyers said it would be a red flag! Never pays to mess with a smart lawyer and play that game. It will come to bite you in the end. Plus, the jury sees that and it does not come off well and makes that witness very unlikable and makes them suspicious of everything you said, just about.
@@marymagdalene3004 exactly! isn't it nice though to watch a trial where no one got shot and it's a he said/she said case! I believe Gwyneth 100%.
And that was so passive/aggressive. These things that showed them to be chips off the daddy's block, just made him look even worse than he was. They were very nasty just like him. Prolly hoping for a piece of the action he might be awarded.
In any accident, the one with higher mobility that hits a stationary or slower moving object will sub stain worse damage. He approached from behind at a high speed so it’s his fault not hers. His speed is what caused his severity of injuries.
If I were a juror I would be tearing my hair out
I feel bad for jenny
I wish she would show up to testify.
I just don't understand why GP didn't bother to say anything or even respond to others asking if she was okay. Human decency is owed to all; no person is above or too good to say a simple "sorry," "you good bro?" or "I'm fine."
she's a Queen don't ya know
I agree! Most likely she was a jerk and he did prolly have injuries. I have brain damage and the guys complaints sound legit to me! He needs my lawyer!
Ok but if she was upset that HE crashed into HER and she felt like she was possibly being assaulted why would she feel the need to stay or check on him? He had people with him and she felt wronged. I think she felt unsafe and she wanted to take herself away from the situation.
She’s a narcissist. She’s exactly like her character in Great Expectations. She’s from a Hollywood family.
I bet she tells household staff and repairmen not to look at her or speak her.
So if there's relevant video why wasn't this sent to defense when charges were filed.If she's right? I'm interested in this link
This is sooo hard to watch, in so many ways!!
Neurodiversity is a generalist term can be applied to ANY disorder that causes a person to think in a manner that is different from the "norm". This can be applied to behavior disorders, complex post traumatic stress disorders, any one of the many personality disorders disorders, Autism ( with all it's sensory disorders) and so forth.
Right, but she’s not qualified to speak on it, or diagnose anyone.
A person who has Autism would probably be more likely to tell the real true and the whole truth. They obviously aren’t too happy about that.
Thats exactly what he doesn't want her to say lol
Neurodivergence isn’t a mental health diagnosis, it’s an intellectual disability.
Yes it is but most people wouldn't know or use that term until they are diagnosed by a medical professional. They are asking her to describe behavior in more of a layman's term. For example, before my nephew was diagnosed on the autism spectrum, the doctor wanted to know what my sister was seeing, tantrums, hitting his head etc. They didn't want clinical terms that she suspected.
Shae was lying.
a pampered princess...that's Gwynneth
The one thing that is total BS about this case is Sanderson should be forced to sit in that court room along with GP in this civil suit. He is not an invalid if he was able to tour the world well after his alleged accident. I hope the jury sees this for what it is a money grab. The older sister was very pleasant in her testimony of the younger sister Jenny, but the other sister Shae is nonchalantly throwing punches at Jenny's interpretation of their father. In speaking of Jenny her sister Shae keeps saying what ever Jenny says " that was her truth" is the very same sentence her older sister said about jenny, VERY Rehearsed. She also claims she was not aware of her dad being blind in one eye that is BS as well. I do feel bad for Sanderson but it certainly at this moment does not prove his head injury was on the slopes that day, it could have happened at any time on one of his many, many vacations. Just because someone has wealth does not mean they deserve to be sued, again why is he able to escape the anxiety of listening to all the testimony that Gwyneth has to endure listening to.
Agree, I can't wait till the cross examination on Sanderson. He is going to freak out. We will all know the exact truth.
Shae is the older sister. Polly is the middle sister and Jenny is the youngest.
Evidently, his medical history shows he already had brain injury, due to a Stroke or something & blind in one eye.
And he's been traveling the world, even Bungie jumping since this incident with GP. Another site covering this, were talking about the one daughter or two of them 'say he is lying & commented to them about 'the money he'll get' and they or she did not want to be a witness for him. Idk which or who was busy with little one & I haven't got to watch the whole thing yet. I'm a bit behind all of you.
@@Riseabove22 yes and I can't wait to see how he reacts to questioning as far as is anger issues.
@@ravenharris1257 Oh ok Thank you for the correction 🙂
I have really come to admire GP Attorney. Acting kind of naive, but slick as a fox.
Right. Me too.
Well said😄
Seems that the reported injuries were to the front of the man's body. Wouldn't that suggest that he ran into her?
If it were the other way around, he would have injuries to his back.
Just an observation.
This argument alone should shut down this money grab uh I mean case.
Interesting..., I wonder why that hasnt been brought up?
they werent to the front of his body, it was his ribs and his head. that can happen from landing on the ground or from being whacked on your back
No, the ribs broke in the front from him hitting the ground. His ribs wouldn't break if his front was gently pressed up against hers spooning like Paltrow said.
@@LivT04too bad it's not how medical science or physics or gravity works. She hit him clear as day.
seems like two things are getting conflated in this case , who hit who , which is clearly at odds, and what the effects of the accident have been on this person , if it is determined that he hit Paltrow then the medical outcome and after effects are irrelevant
That is what it all boils down to. Which skiier was responsible for causing the collision and causing injuries and pain to one of those skiiers. That is the bottom line .
If he ran into her from behind she would have fell back onto him with her body weight. He would have been injured. I think he's trying to collect some money because he wants some. The witnesses are telling different stories. There's no video showing what happened. Somebody is lying. It's up to the jury in the end.
@@nancygodsey8312 Agreed. This is basically a he said, she said.
@@nancygodsey8312 I think the Dr who wrapped up testimony by way of ZOOM this AM would completely disagree with your opinion as to how the collision happened.
@@nancygodsey8312 if that was the case, was paltrow helped up. I thought she just skied off
I agree with some of the comments that I have read here. This judge, you can tell is compassionate, cares for the community members that show up in his courtroom.
We need more guys or judges like him. Whom are not immediately judgmental. Or so arrogant and high up in their robe.
Can see the favouritism already.
Such a kind Judge based on my viewing of this video
I'm not sure that "kind" is the descriptor For this judge. Professional, appropriate, respectful, Those words come to mind. He appears to be very patient also, tolerating Ding-Dong Lawyers on both sides.
A fine example of a Judge👌
That guy saw Pepper Pots on the ski sloops and wanted himself some Ironman money!!!
We need more judges like him
.God bless you..❤
Goood Judge..... 👍
He’s a great judge
And also take the drama out of your testimony.
Neurodiverse is not a medical term as much as it’s a way that many people with autism refer to themselves as.
I swear I would just sit there and look confused because its hard for my brain to know what to say and not say...
Why is Gwyneth Paltrow's lawyer reenacting Philip Seymour Hoffman's Truman Capote performance? So confusing.
Of course your heading must be misleading
Where is this streaming? I need to go back and stream the entire thing bc I can't just come in here blind like this. I want to fully enjoy this and engage actively
GP is a supreme narcissist
However, that doesn't mean she's guilty of the allegations.
It is possible that GP feels she is being blamed for something that she truly does not believe was her fault. If that is the case, she is simply standing up for herself.
@@cattnipp I am qualified to make an opinion on the psycho, social behavior of someone..I'm not a hater, but your response indicates that you are way beyond that stage.
@@VioletJoy Well if you listened to the doctors testimony you would know differently.
Are these REAL lawyers.? I’ve never seen anything like this
You have two older sisters that have been out of the home for many years testifying about the Dad, and you have the youngest with different experiences with Dad and the older sisters are saying she is not mentally capable for testimony to be reliable.
And they do not want to jeopardize the case with her input.
Watch the trial it is disgusting.
I’m not sure whom I believe at this point, but so far, the doctor’s testimony on Terry’s x-ray of his injuries shows that TS was hit from behind and the weight on his back from the fall broke his ribs. If TS ran into Paltrow from behind, his injuries would not have occurred.
That's the evidence all the Paltrow fans on here are ignoring.
Nah, he ran into her.
I mean she said she landed on him so that's why his ribs are broken g.p has never been a reckless person ever shrewd maybe but not reckless
no it was Aliens....
@@stephensmith1118 lol..
That wasn't a reprimand that was guidance and a request. I did not hear a reprimand
Falsely claiming this is a reprimand. The judge is outlining the boundaries and conditions of her testimony. Not a reprimand.
Why are they calling it a crash? People run into each other on ski hills all the freakin time, I have ran into people and people have ran into me many many many times and I even broke my wrist one time. It's unfortunate he is having neurological issues but I have a hard time believing it's because he ran into a 100lb when socking wet woman when he was skiing a few years ago. It's all about $$$
You should’ve sued the person that broke your wrist.
She ran into him and she left him there.
Be careful what you wish for ..it could backfire 😮
I've noticed that 'Nerodivergent' is now a common layperson term.
No. It's not. It isn't used in typical conversations among ordinary populations. Thetapists, educators and families wirh children who have been so identified use it regularly. Others not so much
@@jacquelynbolden2268 ok. Just my observation. Maybe I’m around different lay people.
No, it isn't. Are you from Seattle ??
Great judge
Must be tough for GP to be around regular people for this long.
Especially crooks looking for easy money.
Wait!!! @2:00 min mark, the Judge literally tells the witness she cannot use a “medical-sounding word”. Why? Does a person have to be a medical doctor to use a ‘medical-sounding word’? Does a person have to be a lawyer to use a legal-sounding word? Why will the judge allow the witness to use normal-sounding words? Does he think the Jury will wrongly believe the daughter is a doctor?
Seems a baseless reason to ‘reprimand’ this witness.
Using medical terms insinuates a diagnosis by a medicl professional which she is not. it taints the jury.
It’s an opinion. Which is always excluded unless qualified to be able to give it. Lawyers don’t give evidence.
He was very kind and she was very very accepting of the rule and criticism. If everybody could just be like that
I can’t stand Paltrow, tbh. She comes across as an arrogant entitled so and so. But, by the same token, I can’t stand Sanderson. Come on, man. You are a retired ‘optometrist’, who’s average salary, according to Forbes, is $120,000. You are 76. If you had ‘crashed’ into some financial non-entity, this would never have come to Court.
He is retired....he is not suing for 3 million as people on here are saying..its 300,000..He didnt crash into her..dont you people listen to the doctors report?? His injuries were consistent with her hitting him from behind.
Exactly Terry needs money for retirement 😉
@@lynnmoses3563 he did sue for 3 million, it was reduced.
He did try to sue for $3 million. The judge tossed it out. Terry also sued the Ski Hill and LOST. I feel he’s a horrible human being.
@@kbr1064
Hope she sees this, bro.
IMO this witness was all over the place. Too much elaboration when asked a simple question which only needed a simple answer. Going long with extended detail. Why plaintiff attorney let her go on with unrequested info was foolish IMO. Nice lady, but I thought she was a hot mess on the stand
This is a nice Judge...
Gently admonishes; not a reprimand.
Why is Paltrow allowed to come in and out as she wants esp when the court is in session???
Neurodiverse is a fairly common term these days
@@jfkesq It’s the PC term for autism. And the public has expanded its use to be basically anyone that doesn’t fit the “norm.” What the woke folks don’t realize is that they are saying it’s bad to be autistic so here’s a prettier word so we don’t have to feel uncomfortable around you.
@FirstName LastName Autistic people are Neurodiverse but jot all Neurodiverse people are Autistic. Its an umbrella term. Neurotypical is the opposite term.
It actually doesnt mean being Autistic is bad. Infact the opposite it is just another way the brain works, it is valid, and Neurotypical folks should learn to incorporate Neurodiverse folks into society better.
@@jfkesq woke is just a word you use to excuse your bigotry hatred and anger toward people who arent like you
@@FirstNameLastName-wt5to What’re you talking about lmao, it just means that you’re different. It’s not PC at all
@Phil Seam - I had to look it up, it doesn't sound anything at all like a head INJURY.
Neurodiversity Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster
Neurodiversity is the idea that variation in brain function exists across the population. Differences such as autism and ADHD have existed throughout human history and are not due to faulty neural circuitry. Rather than viewing them as such, neurodiversity embraces autism as a different way of thinking and behaving. Psychology Today (online)
You go judge.
They're trying hard to get that Payday from a celebrity!!
Where is the video of the crash? Is there one?
No.
It’s hard for the daughter to understand what the judge is saying because it requires a change to the fictional narrative she has carefully rehearsed ……..
I would be confused too, as someone who regularly uses medical terms to describe how people act. That’s just what educated people do. The judge literally said “you can’t use medical sounding terms” which is so vague. Like depression is a medical condition. Does that mean she can’t say someone was acting depressed?
Best comment...
@@Letthembelightpeaceonelove When you aren't called to give medical testimony, then you don't use the terminology. She knows this. You don't observe someone acting depressed. You observe someone who doesn't smile, doesn't get out of bed, doesn't go to work, doesn't leave the house, etc. She needed to say what she observed instead of what her diagnosis was. Very clear to me and I'm not a medical professional
This is like all the people who call their Ex's "narcissists" without any medical expertise or diagnosis.
Exactly!! haha and gaslight, trauma, ptsd, etc…I’m not saying people don’t suffer with those, I’m saying that these labels are just tossed around so casually and it loses credibility.
Great Judge
Gentle judge. He’s reasonable. I would be so nervous as usual. But he seems fair.
This daughter knows that she’ll inherit the conman’s money and she is seeing big bucks!!!!!!
If you can't control yourself and or are so frail you get hurt on a minor collision on a blue and or green run, get off the mountain and stay off.
Reprimand is not occurring here, but instead, informing the witness of her limitations. She's slow to comprehend also.
So the words she's using makes her sound TOO credible?
The words she's using are making Jenny seem not credible.
first daughter was awful to watch... I don't know some one could take so awful time to say simple yes or no questions...
Gwen was 👍
I don't even like Gwyneth Paltrow and I think that she's innocent.
Dude, most dads aren’t as lovey dovey!! Geez!
COUNSEL SHOULD KNOW BETTER-DO NOT TO LEAD THE WITNESS ON MEDICAL DIAGNOSIS