You don't even know what you just did for me!❤️ You made it alot easier for me to understand Whats Is Mass And Weight❤️ Like i got a headache knowing this, My Mind went Kaboom😂
Thank you you just saved my life because tomorrow is my exam and I still did not know what is the difference between mass and weight and someone in the comments will say this that hey you should have studied a few months before your exam now you just understood what is the difference between weight and mass I just want to say this to them in advance that I am sorry but you can not tell me what to do and thank you 😊 once again
I have a question. What do we measure when we use a weight scale? it is weight right? so then why is the unit in kg instead of NEWTONS? I mean is it like it first measures the weight then divides it by the gravity and then gives the output?
i am 65 kgs when i measure it on a machine. does it mean that my mass is 65kg (coz kg represents mass and not weight), or does it mean that my weight is 65kgs (then techenically it should be incorrect, coz i should weigh 65N and not 65kg).if it indicates my weight then y is it in Kg and not in Newton? what is correct ? please guide me sir .
I am promoted to class 10 this year and I thought if w = mg (I learnt that in my school) so why not m = w/g using this formulae we might be able to find mass of different objects and I am kinda fascinated by the fact that how can we obtain mass of huge planets without actually weighing them so out of curiosity I want to measure the mass of daily objects using the m = w/g formula, even on Internet I wasnt able to find much about this... So that'll be soo cool if we are able to measure the mass of daily objects (atleast for me) so does anybody have any ideas we together might solve this thing i mean that'll be great 🤘🤘
Please... Tell me... If.. As per ur video: 1. Weight (a force) = m.a ; I'm 100.4 killo then if I simply stand on a ground (the force I. E. Gravitity is still in action but I'm not moving then a become 0 so do my weight become zero... 2. As I am 100.4 kg (on earth) hence in moon I'll weigh less then 100.4 so there may be another planet where I may be more than 100.4 kg weight then how do I measure the exact mass of mine and also does such exception exisits that earth is probably one of few out of millions and millions celestial bodies where the exact mass of a body is same values as showing in a medical Weighing machine or what?
Okay, so amount of molecules or matter in a body represent mass while weight is a force exerted on the body due to gravity. Right I have a question suppose if i currently weigh 62 kg while my body mass is 18 something and if i lose weigh means muscle and fat both by 40% and become physically weak then how the mass can be same ? I think because losing muscle and fat by 40% would mean Matter of my body is reduced
on earth, the mass and weight are the same because we have only one gravity and it's constant. For physics laws, we need to separate them depends on which perspective we would like to view. If we want to consider the constant force = gravity, then we use mass but If we don't want to include the force of gravity, we use mass. w=m*g
When he says mass doesnt change he means in that instant. Or between different gravitational situations eg earth vs moon. If u lose 40% mass ofcourse your weight would reduce because weight is calculated using mass x g2
Listen to the part where I say "provided it doesn't melt". I feel like the point is still across in this explanation. thanks for the view your feedback. It can help.
**AT TIME **1:25** YOU SAID THIS........** "Mass is always the same, and does not change." This is false. And we've known it since Special Relativity in 1905. Einstein said "inertial mass increases if you continue accelerating. The speed of light is the limit of velocity." Notice he did NOT say "the number of atoms - the matter - of the object increases as it accelerates towards the speed of light." He said MASS - inertial mass -increases. 114 years and people still get this wrong. MATTER - the number of atoms IS FIXED. But not mass. MASS is variable. Matter is the POTENTIAL to create mass - inertial mass - when the matter interacts with the background field. Mass IS INERTIA; mass is not MATTER. How do we know that matter - the collection of atoms of an object - creates a *variable amount* of inertial mass? Easy. **SCENE** You're in a car. A dragster is about to tow your car behind it as it moves down the dragstrip. There's a small metal ball hanging from your car mirror by a thread. The ball hangs vertically - straight down. The dragster LAUNCHES off the starting line. WHAT HAPPENS? You get pushed back - HARD - into your car seat. And the hanging ball is pushed backward under the acceleration. The ball is no longer hanging straight down - it is leaning towards the back of your car. WHY? The inertia of the matter of your body; the inertia of the matter of the ball, caused by the ACCELERATION of the dragster. ACCELERATION causes inertia to appear. You would never know you possessed inertial mass -- mass - until you accelerate or declerate. That's just how inertia works. No inertia. No inertial mass until you move. **SCENE 2** You accidentally drive off a mountain road. The ground is 10,000 feet below you. Gravity is pulling you down. By the way, what is gravity? AN ACCELERATION. 9.8m/sec^2. Gravity is pulling you just like that dragster at the dragstrip! **OR IS IT?** You are accelerating at 9.8m/sec^2. NOT ONLY THAT -- the accelerating is INCREASING. Recall that gravity gets weaker as you move away from the planet. And gravity gets stronger as you get closer to the planet - AS YOU FALL. So you're being ACCELERATED, pulled behind a dragster that's accelerating at 9.8m/sec^2 and its acceleration is increasing down the 'drag strip.' OKAY -- is that metal ball being pushed backward, towards the back of your car? After all, you're being ACCELERATED. Just like being pulled by the dragster. And are you being pushed back into your seat due to the acceleration? **NOPE** Why? Because there is a huge decline in inertial mass, downward, in a vector pointing at Earth's center. You don't feel any inertia despite the fact that this gravity 'dragster' is accelerating you HARD. Inertia DECLINES, in a gradient, as you get close to a large rotating matter object. "When is acceleration NOT acceleration? When it's gravity" That's what gravity is. A GRADIENT, a GRADUAL DECLINE, in the amount of inertia that matter objects experience near huge rotating matter objects. Einstein won a Nobel prize 114 years ago partly for telling us "INERTIAL MASS is VARIABLE, it increases as you accelerate" NOT AROUND HUGE ROTATING MATTER OBJECTS. **SCENE 3** You're in space, far from any planet, with a large rock. You try to push the rock in different directions. As you push the rock in any direction you feel the same RESISTANCE, the same inertial mass, in EVERY DIRECTION. Now you move the rock close to Earth. Suddenly, you can no longer push the rock in any direction and experience the same inertial mass. Inertia is DECLINING in the direction of Earth. Finally, as you get closer, the rock is *falling into* the planet. You pull the rock back out into space, far from any planet. You push the rock in different directions. You notice "now I get the same inertia, the same inertial mass, the same resistance to movement in EVERY DIRECTION again." MATTER - the number of atoms - is FIXED. Matter - its atoms - interact electromagnetically with the background field. More atoms, more interactions. That's inertia. Matter is a POTENTIAL. A potential to create inertia when it is moved. The background field is electromagnetic in nature. MASS is VARIABLE. And we've known it for (at least) 114 years. Large rotating matter objects alter the background field's ability to create normal amounts of inertia with matter objects. Inertia DECLINES towards large rotating planets. Matter objects diffuse downward into areas of lower inertia -- DIFFUSE as in the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics. There is less inertia 'pressure' the closer you get to the "inertia rarified" space around a planet. Here's info on the background field. The background field was proven to physically exist by the outcome of the Casimir force experiments, and by the Lamb Shift. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stochastic_electrodynamics#Classical_background_field If you're familiar with inductors, and electric current flow, you know that inductors temporarily block current flow (for 5 time constants). This is conceptually identical to how objects of matter create inertia. The inductor can be seen as 'moving' suddenly through an electromagnet 'background' - the electric current - when power is first turned on. And the inductor feels 'inertia' for 5 time constants before it can 'move' in the electric current (when power is turned on). The inductor is a matter object; the electric current is the electromagnetic background field in this analogy. . . .
Thanks for patiently explaining this. Ignore the hate comments. Your comment made me understand mass to an extent. Will research more to truly understand the Einstein's equation.
Boris Stoyanov is a super bright and an HONEST physicist. He has agreed that the following paragraph (and I quote) is "crystal clear": "ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. This is proven by F=ma AND E=mc2. Accordingly, gravity/acceleration involves balanced inertia/inertial resistance; as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. "Mass"/energy involves balanced inertia/inertial resistance consistent with/as what is balanced ELECTROMAGNETIC/GRAVITATIONAL force/energy, as electromagnetism/energy is gravity. Gravity IS electromagnetism/energy. That objects fall at the same rate (neglecting air resistance, of course) PROVES that ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Think about it." By Frank DiMeglio
Weight W is really to do with the STRESS, like pressure P=F/A or tensile stress, not inertial force F directly. Weight (STATIC)=/= Force (DYNAMIC) W= -P/L= -F/V , where L=length of stressed region of mass; V=Volume; F=force of "ground" on object. WEIGHT is a consequence of GRAVITATIONAL ACCELERATION inducing a PRESSURE FORCE on an object due to another's gravity. WEIGHT is the REACTIONAL PRESSURE GRADIENT of an object in a GRAVITATIONAL FIELD, IN CONTACT WITH A SUPPORTING OBJECT. This is also sometimes referred to as BODY FORCE or FORCE DENSITY. When in free fall (even under gravity) you are... WEIGHT-LESS. -A. EINSTEIN. When stationary with respect to a gravity field equipotential you are... INERT... i.e. INERTIA-LESS. Inertia of one object with respect to another requires RELATIVE MOTION. INERTIA IS RELATIVE MASS IS ABSOLUTE.
when we use kilograms when measuring weight, we actually use kgf or kilogram force. In other words, the weight(force) of one kg is equal to one kgf, or 9.8N.
The ultimate mathematical definition of what is BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is F=ma AND E=MC2 (ON/IN BALANCE): UNDERSTANDING WEIGHT AS BALANCED AND INTERACTIVE INERTIA/INERTIAL RESISTANCE: Define “mass”. You cannot. BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is fundamental. Weight ultimately pertains to and involves what is BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. E=mc² is F=ma. Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. “Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. (Weight necessarily pertains to distance in/of SPACE.) Gravity AND weight are characterized by electromagnetic/gravitational interaction. NOTE: “Inertia" is not properly defined AND understood. The new/correct designation is inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. By Frank DiMeglio
![What is Mass Vs. Weight in Physics? - [1-5-11]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EBRTa8UGY2s/mqdefault.jpg)
![What is Mass Vs. Weight in Physics? - [1-5-11]](/img/tr.png)
I read my textbook a few times trying to make sense of this concept. You made it crystal clear in 4mins. Thank you!!!
You don't even know what you just did for me!❤️
You made it alot easier for me to understand Whats Is Mass And Weight❤️
Like i got a headache knowing this, My Mind went Kaboom😂
If you see someone in the comments with like a ful name, (I.E Jones Joseph) Its probaly a schoolkid sent to this link from their teachers
Lol I got sent this link from school if u r 1 of the kids in my school ya u didn't c that but hi
yes very true
Thank you very much, you explained it perfectly.
UjU
Thanks bro you helped me a lot in my studies
Thank you for giving us those information
Wow... This is the best among the explanations I've heard. Thank you 👏
So how do you measure mass in space to plug into newtons formula?
Helped me a lot..Thanks...
Good Explanation!
Wooooo what an explanation man...!!!! Thank you so much for making this video 😍
Thank you Bro, your content was pure gold
Thank you you just saved my life because tomorrow is my exam and I still did not know what is the difference between mass and weight and someone in the comments will say this that hey you should have studied a few months before your exam now you just understood what is the difference between weight and mass I just want to say this to them in advance that I am sorry but you can not tell me what to do and thank you 😊 once again
A good revision ....long time since i lost in touch
Wow I'm going to grade 7 and this helped me
warms my heart. am glad it helped you. great luck to you Brandon.
Meko toh bol
Thank you for your clear explanation.
Very beautiful and simple way of describing. I understand and able to explain. Thanks for sharing.
great description
Thx this video helped so much thank u for making this for people to understand the difference between weight and mass😃
Omg. ty for making the definition more easier to understand!!!
Thanks for this video it really helped me with my essay to write about weight and mass :)
thanks for explanation tho,good understandable teaching :)
Finally i found the best explain for this.
Good and understandable video. 👍
I have a question. What do we measure when we use a weight scale? it is weight right? so then why is the unit in kg instead of NEWTONS? I mean is it like it first measures the weight then divides it by the gravity and then gives the output?
Great explanation!
U cleared out my confusion ..thnx
A super good vid! I didnt understand other pplbut this one was super easy for e to understand
Thanks teacher that assist with me I watch during exam really and I got a good marks thanks a lot🤜🤛👍👍🤝
That's a wonderful teaching and explanation thanks for this teaching and video thank you soo much😊😊
Thank you so much!
explaination is very good....easy to understand
Am going to 9th grade this helped so much
E to and today is my test after 2 hours
😵😵😵😥😥😓😓😞😞😖😣😣😩😫
Hey, me too!
Many adults don’t know this you’re doing great
🤯🤯🤯
Best of luck, keep up the curiosity, and give as little money to the collage board as possible. - high school junior going on senior
Good explain bro💗
Thank you
Thank you so much 🌹
Thank you 💗
Explain about...graphs in motion lesson..plz..sir
Thankyou so much!
Yeah this is a great video!
Good explanation 👍👍👍
when 4:35Min in youtube is much more useful than 8 years in school
LOL
Finally.. i know now.. Thank you so MUCH 😭
Tysm with lots of love🤗🤗
I'm going to fifth grade thank you
I wish you great luck. Thanks for watching
Thnx all doubts cleared
my all confusions are removed after whatching this animation because i dont even know whats d/F between mass and weight thanks
1 no sir
Tysm!
thank you i wishh all my lessons are thought by you😃😃😃
Thanks a lot bro please can you also explain density
i am 65 kgs when i measure it on a machine. does it mean that my mass is 65kg (coz kg represents mass and not weight), or does it mean that my weight is 65kgs (then techenically it should be incorrect, coz i should weigh 65N and not 65kg).if it indicates my weight then y is it in Kg and not in Newton? what is correct ? please guide me sir .
Love it
Thanks ❤️
Oh no. I'm heavier than I thought 😂😭
Do you live on another planet?
@LIAN CALAYAG bruh 😂😂
Thanks alot
I am promoted to class 10 this year and I thought if w = mg (I learnt that in my school) so why not m = w/g using this formulae we might be able to find mass of different objects and I am kinda fascinated by the fact that how can we obtain mass of huge planets without actually weighing them so out of curiosity I want to measure the mass of daily objects using the m = w/g formula, even on Internet I wasnt able to find much about this...
So that'll be soo cool if we are able to measure the mass of daily objects (atleast for me) so does anybody have any ideas we together might solve this thing i mean that'll be great 🤘🤘
Nice
Badzila thank you...😁🤗
Fantastic video
Bingooo
you explained perfectly😗😗
thank you
Thanks
Thanks😃😊
thanks
I m from arts background but I want to be clear about the Basics of physics .. n it helped me .. 😊
Eh
What is the diffrence between mass and density
Oh It was not boring thank you 🤩👌🙏 and I have share likened sub and save the video
so where does kgf comes in ?
It is for weight right?
what is difference between mass and weight with respect to chemistry
thanks :)
how am i just figuring this out now...thanks
Sir
Could we say the mass of 1 apple = the mass of 2 apples?
Perfect
Please... Tell me... If.. As per ur video:
1. Weight (a force) = m.a ; I'm 100.4 killo then if I simply stand on a ground (the force I. E. Gravitity is still in action but I'm not moving then a become 0 so do my weight become zero...
2. As I am 100.4 kg (on earth) hence in moon I'll weigh less then 100.4 so there may be another planet where I may be more than 100.4 kg weight then how do I measure the exact mass of mine and also does such exception exisits that earth is probably one of few out of millions and millions celestial bodies where the exact mass of a body is same values as showing in a medical Weighing machine or what?
when i weight my body is 40 kg , so it mass or weight?
nice
Okay, so amount of molecules or matter in a body represent mass while weight is a force exerted on the body due to gravity.
Right
I have a question suppose if i currently weigh 62 kg while my body mass is 18 something and if i lose weigh means muscle and fat both by 40% and become physically weak then how the mass can be same ?
I think because losing muscle and fat by 40% would mean Matter of my body is reduced
on earth, the mass and weight are the same because we have only one gravity and it's constant. For physics laws, we need to separate them depends on which perspective we would like to view. If we want to consider the constant force = gravity, then we use mass but If we don't want to include the force of gravity, we use mass.
w=m*g
When he says mass doesnt change he means in that instant. Or between different gravitational situations eg earth vs moon.
If u lose 40% mass ofcourse your weight would reduce because weight is calculated using mass x g2
I like it brother
Tell me rate of change of momentum please thanks bro
india wale idhar
Very good vedio
thx
great this helped me alot
Sir please explain what is mass
anyone here cause of Mr.Mondoux?
yes
Ho kA
You used an object that is literally losing mass as you push it around on your hand even after saying mass never changes.
Listen to the part where I say "provided it doesn't melt". I feel like the point is still across in this explanation. thanks for the view your feedback. It can help.
Also the mass of the ice cube stays the same as long as you keep it contained in the same place e.g. a bowl
**AT TIME **1:25** YOU SAID THIS........**
"Mass is always the same, and does not change."
This is false. And we've known it since Special Relativity in 1905. Einstein said "inertial mass increases if you continue accelerating. The speed of light is the limit of velocity."
Notice he did NOT say "the number of atoms - the matter - of the object increases as it accelerates towards the speed of light."
He said MASS - inertial mass -increases.
114 years and people still get this wrong.
MATTER - the number of atoms IS FIXED.
But not mass.
MASS is variable.
Matter is the POTENTIAL to create mass - inertial mass - when the matter interacts with the background field.
Mass IS INERTIA; mass is not MATTER.
How do we know that matter - the collection of atoms of an object - creates a *variable amount* of inertial mass? Easy.
**SCENE**
You're in a car. A dragster is about to tow your car behind it as it moves down the dragstrip. There's a small metal ball hanging from your car mirror by a thread. The ball hangs vertically - straight down. The dragster LAUNCHES off the starting line. WHAT HAPPENS? You get pushed back - HARD - into your car seat. And the hanging ball is pushed backward under the acceleration. The ball is no longer hanging straight down - it is leaning towards the back of your car. WHY? The inertia of the matter of your body; the inertia of the matter of the ball, caused by the ACCELERATION of the dragster.
ACCELERATION causes inertia to appear. You would never know you possessed inertial mass -- mass - until you accelerate or declerate.
That's just how inertia works. No inertia. No inertial mass until you move.
**SCENE 2**
You accidentally drive off a mountain road. The ground is 10,000 feet below you. Gravity is pulling you down.
By the way, what is gravity? AN ACCELERATION. 9.8m/sec^2.
Gravity is pulling you just like that dragster at the dragstrip!
**OR IS IT?**
You are accelerating at 9.8m/sec^2. NOT ONLY THAT -- the accelerating is INCREASING. Recall that gravity gets weaker as you move away from the planet. And gravity gets stronger as you get closer to the planet - AS YOU FALL.
So you're being ACCELERATED, pulled behind a dragster that's accelerating at 9.8m/sec^2 and its acceleration is increasing down the 'drag strip.'
OKAY -- is that metal ball being pushed backward, towards the back of your car? After all, you're being ACCELERATED. Just like being pulled by the dragster.
And are you being pushed back into your seat due to the acceleration?
**NOPE**
Why?
Because there is a huge decline in inertial mass, downward, in a vector pointing at Earth's center.
You don't feel any inertia despite the fact that this gravity 'dragster' is accelerating you HARD.
Inertia DECLINES, in a gradient, as you get close to a large rotating matter object.
"When is acceleration NOT acceleration? When it's gravity"
That's what gravity is. A GRADIENT, a GRADUAL DECLINE, in the amount of inertia that matter objects experience near huge rotating matter objects.
Einstein won a Nobel prize 114 years ago partly for telling us "INERTIAL MASS is VARIABLE, it increases as you accelerate"
NOT AROUND HUGE ROTATING MATTER OBJECTS.
**SCENE 3**
You're in space, far from any planet, with a large rock. You try to push the rock in different directions. As you push the rock in any direction you feel the same RESISTANCE, the same inertial mass, in EVERY DIRECTION.
Now you move the rock close to Earth. Suddenly, you can no longer push the rock in any direction and experience the same inertial mass. Inertia is DECLINING in the direction of Earth. Finally, as you get closer, the rock is *falling into* the planet.
You pull the rock back out into space, far from any planet. You push the rock in different directions. You notice "now I get the same inertia, the same inertial mass, the same resistance to movement in EVERY DIRECTION again."
MATTER - the number of atoms - is FIXED. Matter - its atoms - interact electromagnetically with the background field. More atoms, more interactions. That's inertia. Matter is a POTENTIAL. A potential to create inertia when it is moved. The background field is electromagnetic in nature.
MASS is VARIABLE. And we've known it for (at least) 114 years.
Large rotating matter objects alter the background field's ability to create normal amounts of inertia with matter objects. Inertia DECLINES towards large rotating planets. Matter objects diffuse downward into areas of lower inertia -- DIFFUSE as in the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics. There is less inertia 'pressure' the closer you get to the "inertia rarified" space around a planet.
Here's info on the background field.
The background field was proven to physically exist by the outcome of the Casimir force experiments, and by the Lamb Shift.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stochastic_electrodynamics#Classical_background_field
If you're familiar with inductors, and electric current flow, you know that inductors temporarily block current flow (for 5 time constants).
This is conceptually identical to how objects of matter create inertia.
The inductor can be seen as 'moving' suddenly through an electromagnet 'background' - the electric current - when power is first turned on. And the inductor feels 'inertia' for 5 time constants before it can 'move' in the electric current (when power is turned on). The inductor is a matter object; the electric current is the electromagnetic background field in this analogy.
.
.
.
Thanks for pointing it out!
get some life
thanks!
Thanks for patiently explaining this. Ignore the hate comments. Your comment made me understand mass to an extent. Will research more to truly understand the Einstein's equation.
@@vamsip98 Exactly. These comments piss me off - lack of knowledge.
Boris Stoyanov is a super bright and an HONEST physicist. He has agreed that the following paragraph (and I quote) is "crystal clear":
"ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. This is proven by F=ma AND E=mc2. Accordingly, gravity/acceleration involves balanced inertia/inertial resistance; as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. "Mass"/energy involves balanced inertia/inertial resistance consistent with/as what is balanced ELECTROMAGNETIC/GRAVITATIONAL force/energy, as electromagnetism/energy is gravity. Gravity IS electromagnetism/energy. That objects fall at the same rate (neglecting air resistance, of course) PROVES that ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Think about it."
By Frank DiMeglio
How you are explaining mass without explaining density??
you look like tada from @Charles the French
Weight W is really to do with the STRESS, like pressure P=F/A or tensile stress, not inertial force F directly.
Weight (STATIC)=/= Force (DYNAMIC)
W= -P/L= -F/V , where L=length of stressed region of mass; V=Volume; F=force of "ground" on object.
WEIGHT is a consequence of GRAVITATIONAL ACCELERATION inducing a PRESSURE FORCE on an object due to another's gravity.
WEIGHT is the REACTIONAL PRESSURE GRADIENT of an object in a GRAVITATIONAL FIELD, IN CONTACT WITH A SUPPORTING OBJECT.
This is also sometimes referred to as BODY FORCE or FORCE DENSITY.
When in free fall (even under gravity) you are... WEIGHT-LESS.
-A. EINSTEIN.
When stationary with respect to a gravity field equipotential you are... INERT... i.e. INERTIA-LESS.
Inertia of one object with respect to another requires RELATIVE MOTION.
INERTIA IS RELATIVE
MASS IS ABSOLUTE.
Can you do next video relate inertia to mass thanks and don't forget to mention meee tysm 💖
Bro op.
Please sir explain in detail
when we use kilograms when measuring weight, we actually use kgf or kilogram force.
In other words, the weight(force) of one kg is equal to one kgf, or 9.8N.
KGF:KOLAR GOLD FIELD
Movie
2:14 anyone gonna talk about how he wrote that we have a different mass on moon?
he said weight :)
The ultimate mathematical definition of what is BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is F=ma AND E=MC2 (ON/IN BALANCE):
UNDERSTANDING WEIGHT AS BALANCED AND INTERACTIVE INERTIA/INERTIAL RESISTANCE:
Define “mass”. You cannot. BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is fundamental. Weight ultimately pertains to and involves what is BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. E=mc² is F=ma. Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. “Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. (Weight necessarily pertains to distance in/of SPACE.) Gravity AND weight are characterized by electromagnetic/gravitational interaction. NOTE: “Inertia" is not properly defined AND understood. The new/correct designation is inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE.
By Frank DiMeglio
I am 7 grade student and 13 years I am indian any one indian out there but I have spotted many Indians out there
🙏🌷