Less grippy and springy than camber, have to work harder to keep it on edge and under control, generally less power than a ski with camber unless you get a super stiff one, but even then they suffer from a less responsive "feel". Generally flat camber can be good for real soft conditions but we don't typically recommend a full flat camber ski as an all mountain daily because they're just not as good in firm snow, period.
How do you think these compare to: Stormrider 95, Mindbender 99Ti, or Enforcer 93 or 100? 6'2" 180lbs, Park City/Alta home mountains. Already have something 110+ underfoot and looking for a fun daily driver that can handle snow, trees, moguls, steeps, but also occasional groomer
@@OrangeSoda42 one of my least favorite skis I’ve demo’d, but could have been a bad tune? Anyway, pulled the trigger on 181cm Masterblasters and couldn’t be happier - one of the best skis I’ve ever been on
@@lorenroot4640 how do they feel at that size? Do they feel like they ski smaller than that? I’m debating which size for me. I’m pretty close to your size 6’3” 190+ and I’m looking for something everyday playful on the East coast.
@@NPow94 honestly they sort of blow my mind. Really one of the more damp and stable skis I've ever been on at this length. Prior to the Masterblasters, I would have said the Brahma 88's @ 180cm were the most damp, but these MB's not only surpass them, they add in the fun factor with the deeper rocker profile. So you can not only lay them over and carve trenches, but you can shut it down or pivot almost instantly. Admittedly it takes a bit to get used to skiing a touch more centered, but once you find that sweet spot, they're truly remarkable. I've also had them in boot-deep super light fluff (Alta), as well as 12"+ chop (also Alta), and both were handled with ease. I honestly think I'll get the 187's next season, though, just to up the speed limit that much more. Not sure I've answered your question, but I'll try and sum up with how I would approach it: if you're a strong skier that skis at least 50% groomers, then I'd probably opt for the 187cm. I rarely hit above 45mph, and for me the 181cm handles those speeds no problem. I also spend more than half my time off-piste, and I really like the maneuverability of the 181's. But at your size, if you're a strong skier, I think you'll be able to maneuver the 187's just as easily is my guess. If you're not looking to go mach speed all the time, ski a lot of bumps and trees, then I'd probably recommend the 181's. Hope that helps!
Love my masterblasters. Perfect east coast ski.
Awesome finally found J ski reviews!
Really great review. Appreciate the overview 👍
Great review!!
Great review! Any chance you’ll do a review of the Metal by J Skis?
can you review J ski escalator?
Can you describe why you guys don’t like flat camber for all mountain? I’m guessing you’re talking about a ski like the BC Damien?
Less grippy and springy than camber, have to work harder to keep it on edge and under control, generally less power than a ski with camber unless you get a super stiff one, but even then they suffer from a less responsive "feel". Generally flat camber can be good for real soft conditions but we don't typically recommend a full flat camber ski as an all mountain daily because they're just not as good in firm snow, period.
i would like to get into ski touring too. would this ski fit the task? thanks
The Escalator is designed for that now in their lineup
How do you think these compare to: Stormrider 95, Mindbender 99Ti, or Enforcer 93 or 100? 6'2" 180lbs, Park City/Alta home mountains. Already have something 110+ underfoot and looking for a fun daily driver that can handle snow, trees, moguls, steeps, but also occasional groomer
get Bent chetler 100s :)
@@OrangeSoda42 one of my least favorite skis I’ve demo’d, but could have been a bad tune? Anyway, pulled the trigger on 181cm Masterblasters and couldn’t be happier - one of the best skis I’ve ever been on
@@lorenroot4640 how do they feel at that size? Do they feel like they ski smaller than that? I’m debating which size for me. I’m pretty close to your size 6’3” 190+ and I’m looking for something everyday playful on the East coast.
@@NPow94 honestly they sort of blow my mind. Really one of the more damp and stable skis I've ever been on at this length. Prior to the Masterblasters, I would have said the Brahma 88's @ 180cm were the most damp, but these MB's not only surpass them, they add in the fun factor with the deeper rocker profile. So you can not only lay them over and carve trenches, but you can shut it down or pivot almost instantly. Admittedly it takes a bit to get used to skiing a touch more centered, but once you find that sweet spot, they're truly remarkable. I've also had them in boot-deep super light fluff (Alta), as well as 12"+ chop (also Alta), and both were handled with ease. I honestly think I'll get the 187's next season, though, just to up the speed limit that much more. Not sure I've answered your question, but I'll try and sum up with how I would approach it: if you're a strong skier that skis at least 50% groomers, then I'd probably opt for the 187cm. I rarely hit above 45mph, and for me the 181cm handles those speeds no problem. I also spend more than half my time off-piste, and I really like the maneuverability of the 181's. But at your size, if you're a strong skier, I think you'll be able to maneuver the 187's just as easily is my guess. If you're not looking to go mach speed all the time, ski a lot of bumps and trees, then I'd probably recommend the 181's. Hope that helps!