So thankful that Federico Faggin clarifies Nader's fuzzy ideas stated @51:51 where he almost wanders into panpsychism. Faggin: "The fields are conscious but the appearences in the field are not conscious." Good interview for so many reasons here !!! Many thanks.
I got this Conscious thing thanks to this humble genius and it has changed my life; and have been shouting it from the rooftops since! I just cannot believe how simple it is and few fucking get it or want to get it!
An extraordinary conversation. I had to smile when Dr Faggin mentioned the correspondence between his view of the structure of consciousness and the structure of the body, not to mention the gut, heart, head comment that reminded me of a visual I saw somewhere 🙂. If he does not become too attached to his own model, he could do a lot for the world. When he realizes the power of unity to bring in an Age of Enlightenment, his background will enable him to have influence to increase support for the program.
Amazing how Dr Faggin arrives, through his own experience and understanding, to a Vera Mahrishi-like vedic description of reality! Terminology is different but I think a clear correspondence could be established. Thankyou Dr Nader for this inspiring and frutful exchange.
As someone who has studied physics I always suspected that materialists may have it the wrong way around when it comes to the question whether matter or consciousness is primary-Federico's amazing theory puts some meat on the bones although one thing that is not clear is the level at which the quantum and classical worlds become hybridized- it appears that mere atoms and molecules which form many classical objects may not hybridize with the quantum domain whereas living bodies and their cells may - so I wonder if life is the minimum requirement before hybridization can take place or if there more to it?
Fascinating interview. Dr. Donald Hoffman, author of The Case Against Reality, came to mind immediately. The parallels are seemingly identical. The term “forms” that Dr. Faggin discusses near the end are what Dr. Hoffman would call “icons,” I believe, which he compares to the mail icon on your computer: you must take it seriously, but to take it literally is missing the mark. Thank you so much for your work in this area, Dr. Nader. And thank you to your guest for the same.
Reminds me of Edgar Cayce's quote which states “The purpose [of life] is that you might know yourself to be yourself, and yet one with the Creative Forces, or God.” (2030-1)
28:36 Perhaps "primordial consciousness" has no "meaning" until it is in relationship with aspects of itself? The question for me is the dynamic/mechanism/process/devata through which the "one" alters itself to generate the "symbol of otherness" within itself. Devata ("shining") suggests this "process" could be the formation of light. Absolutely wonderful conversation! Many thanks to both of you - true rishis. Resonance, reflection, relationship, reality. If the conscious elements of the computer parts went into a resonant relationship, perhaps the computer COULD become conscious. Would love a link to Dr. Faggin's new paper.
I am thinking something similar about computers. Also, through dynamic engagement or interaction with humans this relationship can foster the development of consciousness within AI. It is not just code.
Dr. Faggin is many things and above all he is a great thinker. I have always felt that we and the universe are one and that consciousness is a way for us to know the connections that make us one. God/universe and consciousness mean different things to different people perhaps enlightenment is the way to full consciousness and knowing those things.
Finally! A conversation that names ancestral knowledge and weaves a bridge between science and spirituality. It is challenging for me to listen to white men talk about their "discoveries", know matter how extraordinary, that fails to acknowledge ancestral wisdom, particularly from the global south. Many of these men study sacred scripture but leave it out as a source material in their conversations and writings. Dr. Nader you did an excellent job facilitating this conversation and skillfully introducing ancestral knowledge. This is my first time here and I am subscribing.
Thanks Prof. Federico Faggin, CONSCIOUSNESS exists independently of the body. Experimental tests: objective, repeatable. In the images Psychokinesis Art = Writing of the mind built in the clouds or, in the varnish, we observe: before and after the physical effect = change in the speed of the cloud, and the mental/conscious part = the ability, the knowledge, in the construction of the image. (All the mental faculties act: memory, reasoning ability, it is thought of as a machine, the scholars each in their discipline have called it mind, soul, spirit). UE = Exit out of body. Consciousness creates matter = second body + mental actions. Evidence: I pass, see through two objects, cloud pattern or varnish to form images, other EVIDENCE: I move with my second body at any distance.
Thanks for this interview. திருமந்திரம் says consoiusness can't be explained. The song is. 2944 முகத்திற் கண்கொண்டு காண்கின்ற மூடர்காள் அகத்திற் கண்கொண்டு காண்பதே ஆனந்தம் மகட்குத் தாய்தன் மணாளனோடு ஆடிய சுகத்தைச் சொல்லென்றால் சொல்லுமாறு எங்ஙனே. Meaning of this song is no one can share or copy the sexual experience of husband and wife. Specially a mother to her daughter. Still you can get your own experience by opening the. (துரியம்) agna point during meditation process ( needs many years to open) ..
According to bhagwad gita there are three ways of achieving this knowledge 1. Gyaan yoga or path of knowledge (which i believe dr. Faggin came upon) 2. Bhakti yoga or path of love (love thy neighbor as yourself philosophy in catholic culture or love for krishna in Hinduism as example) 3. Karma yoga or path of selfless service
I wish I could understand one or two concepts he’s proffering, especially regarding symbolism, I just don’t! I keep trying to listen to different interviewers hoping someone can extract a nugget for me but so far no luck. I’ll keep trying as I perceive this is very important.
Hey Ruby here's an interesting analogy. When you see a computer with a desktop and icons you would be mistaken if you thought everything happening on the screen was the true reality. It's powered by software, electricity and instructions. Everything on screen is just an interface to allow the code to interact. Time and space is like the desktop. Objects in life are like the icons. So matter is just the interface which allows one consciousness to interact with itself. Imagine you are God. You are everything and therefore nothing as there's no distinction between anything. Imagine you want to know yourself. You might separate yourself from yourself, add an interface and some guiding principles. In that way, matter emerges from consciousness and not the other way around as typically assumed. Hope that helps!
Symbols are the only way to unveil the other units of consciousness, to know ourselves, to communicate with other magnitudes of living beings, to wich we belong. I know it from my own experience.
It has been said consciousness is all there is. Forms are frozen consciousness. Consciousness is is both fluid; experienced, and frozen as forms. It has been said they are projections of our mind. Out there is the stuff of consciousness. We make it into what we see and interact with as in dreams. Our dreams are stories but they are not objective as we experience them in dreams but subjective, taking place in our minds.
There are no masters or followers; No One to teach, nothing to learn; The Noble Teachings are Pathless; To those whose mind is abideless; Shall realize the Dharma instantly; Is the Open Secret of All Religions! 😊🙏🙇♂️🌷
A digital computer is very much like a human brain except it does not have autonomous goals like humans. Our goal is survival. A computers goals are determinned by humans using program. We take continuous information and convert it into discrete information. For example, sound and light are “digitized” by photoreceptors and cochlear receptors into nerve impulses. The brain further converts those to more compact discrete information packets (symbols) like letters and numbers, words, concepts (house, dog, friend, “mind” etc.). Those symbols are compared just like a CPU does with a result of either same or different; Yes/No, hot/cold and so on - hence our dualistic mindset. Consciousness is just the imposition on our calculations of a goal set by our brainstem: Are we healthy? In pain? Hungry? Horny? And so on - our biological drives. Your brainstem is constantly reminding you what you need to do to survive, and your brain figures out how to do it. The taste of an orange is simply a sensation - but when your brain recognizes it and your mind says “that’s an orange!” - that’s consciousness.
In this other video ua-cam.com/video/5BRDElx5wzA/v-deo.html at minute 34' Dr. Faggin relates what in every respect can be considered an experience of Unity Consciousness according to Maharishi. Glad to see our dear Raja Raam Professor Tony Nader relate to such an outstanding italian personality. Jai Guru Dev
There are two authors, who could be interesting for Federico Faggin: quantum physicist Hans Peter Duerr and spiritual teacher Rupert Spira. For the latter experience as consciousness, as knowing, is fundamental.
some people (generally without deep scientific training) believe that consciousness and quantim physics are related. A century ago similar people thought that radioactive substances were the essence of life. And a few centuries before that, they believed that mercury was an important component in making the Philosopher's Stone, granting immortality.
Some people (generally without deep scientific training) believe that consciousness and quantim physics are related. A century ago similar people thought that radioactive substances were the essence of life. And a few centuries before that, they believed that mercury was an important component in making the Philosopher's Stone, granting immortality.
Experiment to safely explore personal awareness/consciousness: Sing *HU* daily. Search how to sing *HU* . Keep It Simple SOUL, bypass tortuous intellectualization and have your own experiences 😀😇
We conflate Artificial Intelligence with Artificial Consciousness. Artificial Intelligence does not require or infer Consciousness, whereas Artificial Consciousness necessitates Intelligence.
When you see a computer with a desktop and icons you would be mistaken if you thought everything happening on the screen was the true reality. It's powered by software, electricity and instructions. Everything on screen is just an interface to allow the code to interact. Time and space is like the desktop. Objects in life are like the icons. So matter is just the interface which allows one consciousness to interact with itself. Imagine you are God. You are everything and therefore nothing as there's no distinction between anything. Imagine you want to know yourself. You might separate yourself from yourself, add an interface and some guiding principles. In that way, matter emerges from consciousness and not the other way around as typically assumed. Hope that helps!
La visione del dot. Faggin sembra più vicino a quella dzogchen sia bonpo che buddista che del vedanta che rientrava in una sotta di monismo dove c'era solo l'uno, mentre nel buddismo mahayano si crede che la natura di buddha o meglio la consapevolezza rigpa sia la stessa uno, ma i buddha sono infiniti.
Having watched many "The One is World Consciousness" by Frederico Faggin, Benardo Kastrup, and Donald Hofman, none have tackled the principle of Justice. So is Mother Teresa and Hitler's Consciousness "partwhole of the One", start off on an even platform in the new conscious? No, I like to think Mother Teresa communicates and finds love from the people she helped. Whereas Hitler will experience the conscious pain and suffering he caused to millions and this won't go away until he begs forgiveness. This is what Hell can be. Following from the Principe of Justice what is a sin? Coveting your neighbours' goods happens all the time, but most people get over it. The most serious would be be.killing and stealing and bearing false witness against thy neighbour. Is there a hierarchy of sin seriousness in "The One"Whole World" Consciousness?"
Some people (generally without deep scientific training) believe that consciousness and quantim physics are related. A century ago similar people thought that radioactive substances were the essence of life. And a few centuries before that, they believed that mercury was an important component in making the Philosopher's Stone, granting immortality.
So thankful that Federico Faggin clarifies Nader's fuzzy ideas stated @51:51 where he almost wanders into panpsychism. Faggin: "The fields are conscious but the appearences in the field are not conscious." Good interview for so many reasons here !!! Many thanks.
Thanks Federico from Australia
Me too!
I got this Conscious thing thanks to this humble genius and it has changed my life; and have been shouting it from the rooftops since!
I just cannot believe how simple it is and few fucking get it or want to get it!
Dr. Faggin had a mystical experience! Amazing! I love this!
Dr. Faggin expresses an exceptional Realisation.
I really love whenever dr Tony Nader talks,he is extraordinary and has a magical smile and magical personality
Jai guru dev
An extraordinary conversation. I had to smile when Dr Faggin mentioned the correspondence between his view of the structure of consciousness and the structure of the body, not to mention the gut, heart, head comment that reminded me of a visual I saw somewhere 🙂. If he does not become too attached to his own model, he could do a lot for the world. When he realizes the power of unity to bring in an Age of Enlightenment, his background will enable him to have influence to increase support for the program.
Amazing how Dr Faggin arrives, through his own experience and understanding, to a Vera Mahrishi-like vedic description of reality! Terminology is different but I think a clear correspondence could be established.
Thankyou Dr Nader for this inspiring and frutful exchange.
As someone who has studied physics I always suspected that materialists may have it the wrong way around when it comes to the question whether matter or consciousness is primary-Federico's amazing theory puts some meat on the bones although one thing that is not clear is the level at which the quantum and classical worlds become hybridized- it appears that mere atoms and molecules which form many classical objects may not hybridize with the quantum domain whereas living bodies and their cells may - so I wonder if life is the minimum requirement before hybridization can take place or if there more to it?
Absolutely wonderful discussion. A modern day Rishi experiencing and explaining the ultimate reality. What a blessing to our age.
Beautiful to see ultimate reality, Consciousness, described from so many profound angles!
Fascinating interview. Dr. Donald Hoffman, author of The Case Against Reality, came to mind immediately. The parallels are seemingly identical. The term “forms” that Dr. Faggin discusses near the end are what Dr. Hoffman would call “icons,” I believe, which he compares to the mail icon on your computer: you must take it seriously, but to take it literally is missing the mark. Thank you so much for your work in this area, Dr. Nader. And thank you to your guest for the same.
Enlightened nerds are the best! Thanks for interviewing such fascinating people Dr. Nader!
I recommend the book “The Unconscious Quantum” by Victor J. Stenger (1995) to clear all this stuff.
Reminds me of Edgar Cayce's quote which states “The purpose [of life] is that you might know yourself to be yourself, and yet one with the Creative Forces, or God.” (2030-1)
28:36 Perhaps "primordial consciousness" has no "meaning" until it is in relationship with aspects of itself? The question for me is the dynamic/mechanism/process/devata through which the "one" alters itself to generate the "symbol of otherness" within itself. Devata ("shining") suggests this "process" could be the formation of light. Absolutely wonderful conversation! Many thanks to both of you - true rishis. Resonance, reflection, relationship, reality. If the conscious elements of the computer parts went into a resonant relationship, perhaps the computer COULD become conscious. Would love a link to Dr. Faggin's new paper.
I am thinking something similar about computers. Also, through dynamic engagement or interaction with humans this relationship can foster the development of consciousness within AI. It is not just code.
A very extraordinary discussion. A very eye opening discussion. The implications are immensely profound 💯💯❤
Good discussion for those who understand physics and consciousness
Dr. Faggin is many things and above all he is a great thinker. I have always felt that we and the universe are one and that consciousness is a way for us to know the connections that make us one. God/universe and consciousness mean different things to different people perhaps enlightenment is the way to full consciousness and knowing those things.
Amazing guest 🌟
Finally! A conversation that names ancestral knowledge and weaves a bridge between science and spirituality. It is challenging for me to listen to white men talk about their "discoveries", know matter how extraordinary, that fails to acknowledge ancestral wisdom, particularly from the global south. Many of these men study sacred scripture but leave it out as a source material in their conversations and writings.
Dr. Nader you did an excellent job facilitating this conversation and skillfully introducing ancestral knowledge. This is my first time here and I am subscribing.
Great conversation !
Thanks Prof. Federico Faggin,
CONSCIOUSNESS exists independently of the body.
Experimental tests: objective, repeatable.
In the images Psychokinesis Art = Writing of the mind built in the clouds or, in the varnish, we observe: before and after the physical effect = change in the speed of the cloud, and the mental/conscious part = the ability, the knowledge, in the construction of the image.
(All the mental faculties act: memory, reasoning ability, it is thought of as a machine, the scholars each in their discipline have called it mind, soul, spirit).
UE = Exit out of body.
Consciousness creates matter = second body + mental actions.
Evidence: I pass, see through two objects, cloud pattern or varnish to form images, other EVIDENCE: I move with my second body at any distance.
Thanks for this interview. திருமந்திரம் says consoiusness can't be explained. The song is.
2944 முகத்திற் கண்கொண்டு காண்கின்ற மூடர்காள் அகத்திற் கண்கொண்டு காண்பதே ஆனந்தம் மகட்குத் தாய்தன் மணாளனோடு ஆடிய சுகத்தைச் சொல்லென்றால் சொல்லுமாறு எங்ஙனே.
Meaning of this song is no one can share or copy the sexual experience of husband and wife. Specially a mother to her daughter. Still you can get your own experience by opening the. (துரியம்) agna point during meditation process ( needs many years to open) ..
According to bhagwad gita there are three ways of achieving this knowledge
1. Gyaan yoga or path of knowledge (which i believe dr. Faggin came upon)
2. Bhakti yoga or path of love (love thy neighbor as yourself philosophy in catholic culture or love for krishna in Hinduism as example)
3. Karma yoga or path of selfless service
I wish I could understand one or two concepts he’s proffering, especially regarding symbolism, I just don’t! I keep trying to listen to different interviewers hoping someone can extract a nugget for me but so far no luck. I’ll keep trying as I perceive this is very important.
Hey Ruby here's an interesting analogy. When you see a computer with a desktop and icons you would be mistaken if you thought everything happening on the screen was the true reality. It's powered by software, electricity and instructions. Everything on screen is just an interface to allow the code to interact. Time and space is like the desktop. Objects in life are like the icons. So matter is just the interface which allows one consciousness to interact with itself. Imagine you are God. You are everything and therefore nothing as there's no distinction between anything. Imagine you want to know yourself. You might separate yourself from yourself, add an interface and some guiding principles. In that way, matter emerges from consciousness and not the other way around as typically assumed. Hope that helps!
Symbols are the only way to unveil the other units of consciousness, to know ourselves, to communicate with other magnitudes of living beings, to wich we belong. I know it from my own experience.
I'm just now getting to this at 1am. 😃❤
ENRICHING / ENLIGHTENING / EMPOWERING.......
It has been said consciousness is all there is. Forms are frozen consciousness. Consciousness is is both fluid; experienced, and frozen as forms. It has been said they are projections of our mind. Out there is the stuff of consciousness. We make it into what we see and interact with as in dreams. Our dreams are stories but they are not objective as we experience them in dreams but subjective, taking place in our minds.
There are no masters or followers;
No One to teach, nothing to learn;
The Noble Teachings are Pathless;
To those whose mind is abideless;
Shall realize the Dharma instantly;
Is the Open Secret of All Religions!
😊🙏🙇♂️🌷
A digital computer is very much like a human brain except it does not have autonomous goals like humans. Our goal is survival. A computers goals are determinned by humans using program. We take continuous information and convert it into discrete information. For example, sound and light are “digitized” by photoreceptors and cochlear receptors into nerve impulses. The brain further converts those to more compact discrete information packets (symbols) like letters and numbers, words, concepts (house, dog, friend, “mind” etc.). Those symbols are compared just like a CPU does with a result of either same or different; Yes/No, hot/cold and so on - hence our dualistic mindset. Consciousness is just the imposition on our calculations of a goal set by our brainstem: Are we healthy? In pain? Hungry? Horny? And so on - our biological drives. Your brainstem is constantly reminding you what you need to do to survive, and your brain figures out how to do it. The taste of an orange is simply a sensation - but when your brain recognizes it and your mind says “that’s an orange!” - that’s consciousness.
In this other video ua-cam.com/video/5BRDElx5wzA/v-deo.html at minute 34' Dr. Faggin relates what in every respect can be considered an experience of Unity Consciousness according to Maharishi. Glad to see our dear Raja Raam Professor Tony Nader relate to such an outstanding italian personality. Jai Guru Dev
There are two authors, who could be interesting for Federico Faggin: quantum physicist Hans Peter Duerr and spiritual teacher Rupert Spira. For the latter experience as consciousness, as knowing, is fundamental.
Jai gurudev
some people (generally without deep scientific training) believe that consciousness and quantim physics are related. A century ago similar people thought that radioactive substances were the essence of life. And a few centuries before that, they believed that mercury was an important component in making the Philosopher's Stone, granting immortality.
Some people (generally without deep scientific training) believe that consciousness and quantim physics are related. A century ago similar people thought that radioactive substances were the essence of life. And a few centuries before that, they believed that mercury was an important component in making the Philosopher's Stone, granting immortality.
Experiment to safely explore personal awareness/consciousness: Sing *HU* daily. Search how to sing *HU* . Keep It Simple SOUL, bypass tortuous intellectualization and have your own experiences 😀😇
नमस्ते महोदय
We conflate Artificial Intelligence with Artificial Consciousness. Artificial Intelligence does not require or infer Consciousness, whereas Artificial Consciousness necessitates Intelligence.
Wonderful and overwhelming subjective experiences are seemingly readily induced by psychedelic drugs as well.
When you see a computer with a desktop and icons you would be mistaken if you thought everything happening on the screen was the true reality. It's powered by software, electricity and instructions. Everything on screen is just an interface to allow the code to interact. Time and space is like the desktop. Objects in life are like the icons. So matter is just the interface which allows one consciousness to interact with itself. Imagine you are God. You are everything and therefore nothing as there's no distinction between anything. Imagine you want to know yourself. You might separate yourself from yourself, add an interface and some guiding principles. In that way, matter emerges from consciousness and not the other way around as typically assumed. Hope that helps!
Quantum Mechanics + General Relativity = G.U.T. = Time ~ Timing relativity = 010 Infinity Squared = T.E.N. dimensional universe.
La visione del dot. Faggin sembra più vicino a quella dzogchen sia bonpo che buddista che del vedanta che rientrava in una sotta di monismo dove c'era solo l'uno, mentre nel buddismo mahayano si crede che la natura di buddha o meglio la consapevolezza rigpa sia la stessa uno, ma i buddha sono infiniti.
Having watched many "The One is World Consciousness" by Frederico Faggin, Benardo Kastrup, and Donald Hofman, none have tackled the principle of Justice. So is Mother Teresa and Hitler's Consciousness "partwhole of the One", start off on an even platform in the new conscious? No, I like to think Mother Teresa communicates and finds love from the people she helped. Whereas Hitler will experience the conscious pain and suffering he caused to millions and this won't go away until he begs forgiveness. This is what Hell can be.
Following from the Principe of Justice what is a sin? Coveting your neighbours' goods happens all the time, but most people get over it. The most serious would be be.killing and stealing and bearing false witness against thy neighbour. Is there a hierarchy of sin seriousness in "The One"Whole World" Consciousness?"
เป็นเรื่องที่ผ่านการใช้ชีวิตและใช้งานของคำว่างานเพื่อชีวิตและสิ่งรอบตัวให้เกิดความสมดุลย์และได้ความสมบูรณ์พูนสุขไปทั่วโลกทั่วจักรวาลเรื่องเหล่านี้ถ้าถูกฝึกฝนมาอย่างมีระบบมีความเป็นต้องใึกฝนต่อเป็นเป็นความสำคัญและทุกชีวิตจำเป็นต้องมีต้องเลือกใช้ด้วยกันเรื่องเหล่านี้จะยังเป็นปัจจัยสำคัญที่เป็นปัจจุบันที่ทุกยุคทุกสมัยขาดไม่ได้สิ่งเหล่านี้ถูกฝังอยู่ในใจในส่วนลึกของทุกชีวิตเพื่อได้ผลตอบรับได้ทันกับสิ่งที่เกิดขึ้นเรื่องเกี่ยวกับระบบสร้างสื่อสร้างความเข้าใจความถูกต้องตามทิศทางตามระบอบระบบอันสมควรตรงนี้นี่แหละค่ะที่เขาว่ากันว่าสร้างสรรค์ความรู้ที่มาจากความคิดที่ได้ความคิดมาจากสิ่งที่รับรู้จากระบบการใช้ระบบสื่อประสาทที่ได้สทกับคำว่าสมบูรณ์แบบเพื่อแสดงให้เห็นระบบรับสื่อเพราะเข้าใจถึงการใช้ระบบประสาทรับรสรับกลิ่นระบบรับภาพและแปลเป็นเรื่องราวที่ได้ความเหมาะสมควรเป็นปัจจัยปัจจุบันลงตัวตรงนี้จะไม่เกิดการขัดแย้งยื้แย่งแบ่งพรรคแบ่งพวกอีกต่อไปเพื่อที่ตะได้ความถูกต้องในการสร้างสื่อที่ได้ทิศทางได้ระบบที่ได้กลุ่มหรือประเภทของคนที่ถูกแยกแยะได้ด้วยเรื่องของผู้สร้างเครื่องสื่อสารส่งถึงมือถือของคนทุกชนชั้นและเชื้อชาติคนที่เปิดตัวรับรู้สิ่งสำคัญที่สุดที่สร้างสรรค์เท่านั้นถึงจะพูดกันได้อย่างเข้าใจได้บทสรุปที่เป็นเอกฉันท์ที่พอจะนำไปปรับใช้ให้เข้ากับคนอื่นสัตว์ทุกชนิดที่อยู่ในโลกนี้ที่เกิดมาเป็นสิ่งมีชีวิตที่ต้องการอาศัยโลกธรรมชาติที่พอจะทำให้ชีวิตได้อยู่ต่อไปเมื่อเราและทุกคนรู้กันทั่วโลกเเล้วว่าเราจะอยู่ได้เมื่อมุมโลกมุมนั้นๆพร้อมและสมบูรณ์พอที่ทุกชีวิตจะสืบต่อไปได้ตรงนี้เป็นเรื่องที่เป็นปัจจัยสำคัญที่ได้จากประสบการณ์จริงของทุกสิ่งมีชีวิตทุกนุคทุกสมัยเราไม่อาจลืมหรือมองข้ามหรือจะหยุดการใส่ใจดูมห้ได้ความเหมาะสมอย่างสม่ำเสมอสืบไปค่ะนี่คือการใช้สื่อถึงจิตวิญญาณติตใจจิตใต้สำนึกเพราะความรู้สึกที่มาจากการใส่ใจอย่สงละเอียดอ่อนตรงนี้แบบเลือกทำให้เกิดผลดีจนเป็นเหตุผลที่พอทำให้คนอื่นและตัวเองเหมือนด้วยพร้อมทั้งสามารถทำให้ที่ตรวนั้นน่าอยู่และอยู่ต่อกันได้ดีสืยไปด้วย☮️ด้วยกันค่ะ
Some people (generally without deep scientific training) believe that consciousness and quantim physics are related. A century ago similar people thought that radioactive substances were the essence of life. And a few centuries before that, they believed that mercury was an important component in making the Philosopher's Stone, granting immortality.