Euclid's Elements Book 1 - Proposition 9

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 15 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 9

  • @joefreeman3772
    @joefreeman3772 3 роки тому +2

    I know I'm over seven years late, but thank you Sandy.

  • @warwolt
    @warwolt Рік тому

    This is a really nice proof

  • @Alyss93
    @Alyss93 8 років тому +1

    I love these videos! So clear and concise and excellent for a new beginner into the world of Euclid :) Just one tiny correction: from this video onwards, it appears that you've spelled "Elements" as "Elememts" in the title. Otherwise, it's great :)

  • @pallmall7385
    @pallmall7385 5 років тому +2

    You're so good!

  • @p1nesap
    @p1nesap 5 років тому

    I'm sure you're trying, but too rigid, stiff, not intuitive.

    • @SandyBultena
      @SandyBultena  5 років тому +8

      To be helpful, you need to be more specific.
      The proof itself comes from Euclid, so if it is unintuitive, nothing I can do about it. (see original: archimedes.fas.harvard.edu/euclid/output/files/elem.1.9.html)
      If however, you are commenting on my interpretation, then please detail how you would improve the presentation of the proof.
      If you are commenting on my "delivery", well, I am not a professional, and as you say, I am trying.

    • @joefreeman3772
      @joefreeman3772 3 роки тому +1

      there is no royal road to geometry -Euclid

    • @Penrodyn
      @Penrodyn 2 роки тому +3

      Euclid’s geometry is by its natural formal. The narrators style is clear and to the point. I don’t need it to be ‘fun’. The topic itself is its own reward.

    • @quandarkumtanglehairs4743
      @quandarkumtanglehairs4743 Рік тому

      For someone looking for garish chintz and wazoo bazingabangers, yeah, sure, content might be dry.
      For the imaginative amongst us, Sandy's content is PERFECT.