Govt must explain to people that we used to have these rights - until Thatcherism and beyond removed them bit by bit. This isn’t creating something brand new and scary.
Yes so by your thinking going back to the 60/70s industrial mayhem is a good idea? Its nonsense flexible working is nonsense the person paying your wage tells you where and when to work end of. If the civil service response times are anything to go by they all need to be in the office. What took 8 weeks now takes 8 months and counting to get a response! Im against zero hours contracts but there needs to be a balance to allow employers to terminate poor standard staff
This is going to kill small businesses and it is only going to allow coperatetions get bigger than they already are Google. How many politicians have set up and ran a business
It makes good economic sense. When people feel secure in work they have confidence to spend. Financial institutions have more confidence to lend knowing borrowers will be employed. Too many employers have advertised jobs never intending them to be permanent just to deliver a short term project. Now they'll have to be more honest about the contract. Job insecurity hasn't done our economy any favours.
A good UA-cam video about tourism.. it said that last year, around 3 billion overnight stays in Europe last year. Remind me... Why are such deep precarious working is happening?..... Can we keep 800 million precarious workers ?.... We don't have this at all. And these so called private companies are nonsense ? Cos people are over drugging. Over excess... And it is causing financial crashes.
@MeiinUK Working class people receiving better pay and conditions has never caused a financial crash. 2008 was caused by greed of financiers, dergulation, excessive risk taking, and the sub prime market market collapsing. Also people getting high saved the 2008 crash from being as bad as it could have been because of the liquidity of drug money.
It's amazing that anyone can talk about labour rights and job security, whilst simultaneously defending the idea of masses of people being brought in to dilute the labour pool (which big business also advocates for). You people are not serious about tackling the underlying causes of these issues or about listening to what the working class actually wants.
@@Skygrey2943 : The financial crash is caused by the migration of people and using credit cards too, and some of those actions caused the situation to liquidate the reserve pool. So many infracture lending between countries that were setup before... ended up forcing or indirectly forcing... situations to occur like, absolute freedom of movements? So... today, when you see the media, why is social media now exists in the world? Should it be as so, and BE as such? The answer is a good "no". We now have no manual control of the internet. We have no control over the AI. We have lost ALL controls as well... ua-cam.com/video/pWjr0dgMqc0/v-deo.html
You take a job those rights should be yours from day one that holds the shysters to account instead of laying them off before their trial period is up.
3:26 “headlines are scary” as a small business owner I don’t see how this negatively effects me? I don’t exploit the people who work for me, and rely on my business for their families income. These headlines are not negative for a fair business that treats its employees right. The ones it discourages are those with selfish or ill intent. When workers rights came in the early 20th century, I am sure a lot of workhouses and coal mines were angry 😂
@@DarrenSmith-tq2xz sorry but i disagree. Unless you’re someone who treats employees like disposable seasonal workers. You’re not affected! My business consults small businesses, and I can assure you, it’s only those with selfish or ill intent who are affected.
What do you think employment is? To be employed means to be exploited. It doesn’t matter how nice the owner of the business, you’re still being exploited to build another man’s dream. Which is the definition of modern slavery according to the ONS.
That treating employees fairly and needing legislation put in place to do so, is described as a threat, shows those doing so are corrupt and too immoral to have a business. If they had their way, they'd have children up chimneys quicker than you can say "Tories pushed a third of UK children into poverty".
If a small business owner is scared by this, it's because they can't - or don't want to - employ people fairly. Good indicator they should find something else to do.
Abolish zero hour contracts. Increase top rate of income tax to 60%. Raise minimum wage to £15 per hour immediately. Raise universal credit. Roll back higher than inflation rent increases to pre covid. Nationalise energy companies decrease rate in line with inflation. Include standing charges in unit rates for gas and electric. A rise in standing charge from £120 per year dual fuel to £400 is a massive tax on the poor and low users.
I have lost two jobs to networks within my Facebook group. Then another network from uni days sent an advertising spam and attacked me. I knew it. It was a security breach. And then the media sectors people did their dues. That was never advertised. Those people are still in positions of powers. Insurance companies are not doing well. Criminal issues are being put forward and yet somebody paid the low income people deliberately to provoke them to steal and they walked right into that trap to steal things. The media gets all the adverts and the pay. The insurance executives get a high pay. It secures more infrastructure spending....
Even Tory couldnt do this damage to workers 😅 3 months probation period incread to 9 month you dont know if employer could say you met requirements or not
Not sure you understand this properly, currently its 2 years before you gain full employment rights. So 9 months is definitely an improvement, the question is where they will set that line, it was day 1, than 6 months and now 9 months.
It's been 6+ years and we have not forgotten: Cathy Newman committed listening and question-phrasing errors in her interview on January 16, 2018. We condemn you seriously, Cathy Newman. We are committed to criticizing your behavior and making sure that journalism is done in high standards.
If you work your entire life but are still expecting to rely on the state pension then you've wasted your life. Maybe you should have paid more attention and worked harder during your 10 years of free compulsory education. Stop blaming others and take responsibility for your own life.
Talk talk talk no action. On their application form they ask for english speakers but half of the people applying are immigrants and non english speakers and English speakers dont want to do the job because the pay is too low. Its all mixed up and lots of confusion and if you noticed not a single young person in their 20s on that line. Increase the pay and allow people to have sick leave and pay them . Again that also why the younger generation are staying child free because who in these day and age can afford to feed an extra mouth on minimum wage??? All our tax money has gone to Ukraine war and Palestine war thats where our money went and nothing for us the british citizens and the government want people to keep working till they drop because the government lack empathy towards its own people.
Companies should find out potential people who they might employ check their employment background. If they have a poor attendance at the workplace then dont employ them
New rights for the first time?!? As long as managers can instruct nurses that "head injuries are not a priority here", because a specialist service would not be an A&E and make it hard for nurses to briefly assess, support a healthy outcome and liaise with GP surgeries, for example, there will be problems.... If managers are not concerned about the health impact of clinical negligence on Service Users and Staff, and how this relates to increased costs at another end, of course they will not change these attitudes. Maybe some are not educated? Feedback and evaluation should not be outsourced to binary systems operated by statisticians or others who never experienced the front line, because any evidence base that only asks Yes and No is missing context, breaking down complexity into departments and thereby creating cracks in the system, that exclude people with complex problems. I truly believe that no-one who works for their living really likes 0 hour contracts. Accountability for leaders would be a breath of fresh air, but there seems to be authority where that used to be.
You can't have policy that is both pro business and pro workers. Their desires are mutually exclusive. It is not possible to pay workers more and less at the same time. It is also impossible to give people job security while also making it easier to for business to fire people. Every issue is the same, if it's good for workers it's bad for business and vice versa.
I wonder if Martin McTague is a Tory? If the headlines are going to be worrying just tell all the small businesses to stop reading the Daily Mail. Problem solved.
However chilling it is, if small businesses want to grow they need staff. Staff are people to be respected. I wish there was some insurance sick pay for the self employed - maybe there is and I don't know about it?
An improvement but still tinkering round the edges with a lot of holes and gaps for companies to exploit. The biggest change in a generation? Maybe but that says more about the lack of change than the scale of this one. Overselling and underdelivering.
This is only going to get mutch worse than anyone can emagine we are loosing the brightest people in the UK they are going to to be leaving in there droves
This idea that if someone else gains then you correspondingly lose, is an association not based in reality. This fallacy is used whenever politicians want to justify something they know is unpopular. After 14 years of austerity, you've just become accustomed to reading about it in news media owned by the top 1% in possession of half the world's wealth.
The cost of living crisis is because we have a dying currency we needed to adress the UK debt which is currently at 150 percent of debt to GDP and the currency has 1 percent of purchasing power left this is economics 101
Genuine question, if increasing the minimum wage doesn't put up overall costs for goods and services, can you explain where the money comes from to top up minimum wage? From where I stand that would only leave 2 other options, businesses make efficiencies and hire less staff to do the same amount of work (raising unemployment) or they absorb the cost by reducing profit margins (unlikely due to greed and impact on share price for larger businesses). Did I miss anything?
Can you explain how you think this will be the case? And how existing business law isn’t both a) helping business at the expense of workers while also b) still causing cost of living rises?
What a load of blurb she talks what she wants us to hear do they think this will make us like them no too little too late and it’s only a few months in.
Typical, once in power things get watered down from a previous stance of righteous anger and indignation about "putting things right". I get that business have their concerns, but surely even the smallest business want's to see the back of unfair and exploitative practices?? And a lead time of two years to implement whatever survives the legislative process? The next election will be just around the corner!!
Of course not they would do anything to keep costs down to increase profits/payout shareholders. Look at Thames water, they had the dream a regional monopoly of millions of trapper consumers and all they had to do was the bare minimum of investment to keep away the government and they could of Sat back and watch the money pour in. But instead they hiked prices paid out the shareholders and bonuses to themselves and will now likely be renationalised.
Day 1 seems extreme, 6 months is great balance, 9 months seems to be pushing on too long. If a company needs 9 months to decide if someone is suitable for the job they are not serious. We should do it based on income, anyone earning under 40k, 6 months. For high earners that may require longer time to yield results we could say 1 year or so.
Sounds great as long as workers don’t abuse the system. This definitely doesn’t help small businesses. Labourer is only looking after unions in big companies.
Workers can't abuse the system, the system is entirely rigged against them. Wage theft by employers is significant however, as is underpayment and breaches of employment law. The only side abusing the system is employers.
Don't know what that woman saying she only got £100 a month sick pay. SSP is £116 a week, still rubbish but more than job seekers allowance. Might get more from Universal Credit or Employment support allowance but then you don't have a job to go back to...
People don't want to work nowadays. Think money grows on trees or the govt, just has to print more so they can watch reality TV shows at home or play games on the internet.
"You'll hear, 'workers rights' nonsense, you have no rights. If you cannot negotiate your own wages to stay competitive then you have no rights. The union boss has taken your freedom" yuri bezmanov
Can you possibly explain how any one person has the leverage to negotiate with a company that can replace them quicker than they can find a new job at the terms they want?
@@RogerMellie-yk3gw It does for most people who just want a standard Mon-Fri days job. As 3 on 3 off is a shift pattern, which companies would normally use for 24hr cover. The average person doesn't want do this, as they would loose their weekends. I believe only around 14% of the country currently does shift work. A 4 day week would make more sense, and I imagine a lot of people probably do that now anyway in office based roles.
@@RogerMellie-yk3gw It does for most people who just want a standard Mon-Fri days job. As 3 on 3 off is a shift pattern, which is something companies would normally use for 24hr cover. The average person doesn't want do this, as they would loose their weekends. I believe only around 14% of the country currently does shift work. A 4 day week would make more sense, and I imagine a lot of people do this already.
Angela is a talented minister with stunning curves, she's already a ready-made queen. Charles should take a closer look at her portfolio. What a beautiful speech in classic language; she doesn't miss a single sound. Everything hisses, buzzes, and moves - she's a real ball of immense energy.
Zero hours should never have been allowed in the first place
Govt must explain to people that we used to have these rights - until Thatcherism and beyond removed them bit by bit.
This isn’t creating something brand new and scary.
Hehehe, you sound really brit, dense. The bill is not created but reinstated and it is a very good thing for every one
@@dutchymaze6315 Except if you run a business of course.......
Yes so by your thinking going back to the 60/70s industrial mayhem is a good idea? Its nonsense flexible working is nonsense the person paying your wage tells you where and when to work end of. If the civil service response times are anything to go by they all need to be in the office. What took 8 weeks now takes 8 months and counting to get a response! Im against zero hours contracts but there needs to be a balance to allow employers to terminate poor standard staff
@@stigmontgomery7901 You dont have the right to take advantage of despeate people just so you can have a business.
@@Carlin2810 exactly were not in the Victorian and previous eras where employers abused their staff with impunity
Let's stop hating those who fight for better working conditions. Then maybe we can start getting somewhere.
This is going to kill small businesses and it is only going to allow coperatetions get bigger than they already are Google. How many politicians have set up and ran a business
It makes good economic sense. When people feel secure in work they have confidence to spend. Financial institutions have more confidence to lend knowing borrowers will be employed. Too many employers have advertised jobs never intending them to be permanent just to deliver a short term project. Now they'll have to be more honest about the contract. Job insecurity hasn't done our economy any favours.
Labour do, on occasion, come up with good ideas. This is one of them.
A good UA-cam video about tourism.. it said that last year, around 3 billion overnight stays in Europe last year. Remind me... Why are such deep precarious working is happening?..... Can we keep 800 million precarious workers ?.... We don't have this at all. And these so called private companies are nonsense ? Cos people are over drugging. Over excess... And it is causing financial crashes.
@MeiinUK Working class people receiving better pay and conditions has never caused a financial crash. 2008 was caused by greed of financiers, dergulation, excessive risk taking, and the sub prime market market collapsing. Also people getting high saved the 2008 crash from being as bad as it could have been because of the liquidity of drug money.
It's amazing that anyone can talk about labour rights and job security, whilst simultaneously defending the idea of masses of people being brought in to dilute the labour pool (which big business also advocates for). You people are not serious about tackling the underlying causes of these issues or about listening to what the working class actually wants.
@@Skygrey2943 : The financial crash is caused by the migration of people and using credit cards too, and some of those actions caused the situation to liquidate the reserve pool. So many infracture lending between countries that were setup before... ended up forcing or indirectly forcing... situations to occur like, absolute freedom of movements? So... today, when you see the media, why is social media now exists in the world? Should it be as so, and BE as such? The answer is a good "no". We now have no manual control of the internet. We have no control over the AI. We have lost ALL controls as well...
ua-cam.com/video/pWjr0dgMqc0/v-deo.html
9 months is better than 2 years.
Sick of these abusive companies rigging the system and treating staff like trash.
USED TO BE 6 MONTHS AROUND 2002
You take a job those rights should be yours from day one that holds the shysters to account instead of laying them off before their trial period is up.
@@JugglinJellyTake01 Nailed it! 👍
TBF though most of you are shite.
“ Could take 2 years to implement “. If the change was for the betterment of the MPs it would be passed the same day.
Exactly!
3:26 “headlines are scary” as a small business owner I don’t see how this negatively effects me? I don’t exploit the people who work for me, and rely on my business for their families income. These headlines are not negative for a fair business that treats its employees right. The ones it discourages are those with selfish or ill intent. When workers rights came in the early 20th century, I am sure a lot of workhouses and coal mines were angry 😂
You are going to see small business disappear this is to make the bigs get bigger
@@DarrenSmith-tq2xz sorry but i disagree. Unless you’re someone who treats employees like disposable seasonal workers. You’re not affected! My business consults small businesses, and I can assure you, it’s only those with selfish or ill intent who are affected.
Exploitation of worker must be stopped full stop.
What do you think employment is? To be employed means to be exploited. It doesn’t matter how nice the owner of the business, you’re still being exploited to build another man’s dream. Which is the definition of modern slavery according to the ONS.
That treating employees fairly and needing legislation put in place to do so, is described as a threat, shows those doing so are corrupt and too immoral to have a business. If they had their way, they'd have children up chimneys quicker than you can say "Tories pushed a third of UK children into poverty".
When are we making 4 day work week a LAW? Unless it is law these corporate leeches will never bring it.
And once we have the 4 day week then introduce a 3 day week, then a 2 day..................................
If a small business owner is scared by this, it's because they can't - or don't want to - employ people fairly. Good indicator they should find something else to do.
Abolish zero hour contracts.
Increase top rate of income tax to 60%.
Raise minimum wage to £15 per hour immediately.
Raise universal credit.
Roll back higher than inflation rent increases to pre covid.
Nationalise energy companies decrease rate in line with inflation.
Include standing charges in unit rates for gas and electric. A rise in standing charge from £120 per year dual fuel to £400 is a massive tax on the poor and low users.
You think lord Ali s puppets will do these changes 😅
Your insane 🤣🤣
@@cyberlunatics5195 Those are all pretty milk-toast when compared with either UK recent history and/or other developed European countries
@cyberlunatics5195
Right and your either a sock puppet or happy to be walked over either way your comment is irrelevant.
A whole lot of SMEs will stop hiring if minimum wage were to rise that high.
Responsible businesses will be responsible employers, looking after their employees. Greedy profiteers will exploit employees.
as a young person it is very hard to even get to the 2 year point in a job they either fire you or do their best to make you want to quit
Maybe because you suck at your job?
I have lost two jobs to networks within my Facebook group. Then another network from uni days sent an advertising spam and attacked me. I knew it. It was a security breach. And then the media sectors people did their dues. That was never advertised. Those people are still in positions of powers. Insurance companies are not doing well. Criminal issues are being put forward and yet somebody paid the low income people deliberately to provoke them to steal and they walked right into that trap to steal things. The media gets all the adverts and the pay. The insurance executives get a high pay. It secures more infrastructure spending....
They won't fire you if you're good at your job
@@RogerMellie-yk3gwIt happens all the time, I'm afraid.
@@moomin7461 why would they fire someone who was good at their job?
Even Tory couldnt do this damage to workers 😅 3 months probation period incread to 9 month you dont know if employer could say you met requirements or not
Not sure you understand this properly, currently its 2 years before you gain full employment rights. So 9 months is definitely an improvement, the question is where they will set that line, it was day 1, than 6 months and now 9 months.
It's been 6+ years and we have not forgotten: Cathy Newman committed listening and question-phrasing errors in her interview on January 16, 2018. We condemn you seriously, Cathy Newman. We are committed to criticizing your behavior and making sure that journalism is done in high standards.
Well these lazy loafers will spend more time unemployed as small businesses will think again before hiring. This government have no idea!
Always thinking the worst of people. I feel sorry for you with such a negative outlook on people.
the deputy PM did not fully check behind her while reversing on the pallet truck, this is very reckles and she should have to re-sit her PPT test.
4 things the UK gov wants us to do.
1. Work in the UK
2. Pay tax in the UK
3. Consume in the UK
4. Die before you get state pension
DON'T DO IT
The truth. Same in France.
I will do it. I like all of those things. They aren't negatives.
If you work your entire life but are still expecting to rely on the state pension then you've wasted your life. Maybe you should have paid more attention and worked harder during your 10 years of free compulsory education. Stop blaming others and take responsibility for your own life.
Talk talk talk no action. On their application form they ask for english speakers but half of the people applying are immigrants and non english speakers and English speakers dont want to do the job because the pay is too low. Its all mixed up and lots of confusion and if you noticed not a single young person in their 20s on that line. Increase the pay and allow people to have sick leave and pay them . Again that also why the younger generation are staying child free because who in these day and age can afford to feed an extra mouth on minimum wage??? All our tax money has gone to Ukraine war and Palestine war thats where our money went and nothing for us the british citizens and the government want people to keep working till they drop because the government lack empathy towards its own people.
Literally not a single point you made in your tirade is factually correct... you're not a supporter of Comrade Trump are you? 🤣
@@PythonesqueSpam Oh look a xenophobic neocon warhawk in the wild.
You lot are a rare breed these days.
If she's responsible for the Job Centres and the so-called 'work coaches', then she's clearly doing a terrible job
Companies should find out potential people who they might employ check their employment background. If they have a poor attendance at the workplace then dont employ them
Another hand out to those incapable of holding down a job.
New rights for the first time?!?
As long as managers can instruct nurses that "head injuries are not a priority here", because a specialist service would not be an A&E and make it hard for nurses to briefly assess, support a healthy outcome and liaise with GP surgeries, for example, there will be problems....
If managers are not concerned about the health impact of clinical negligence on Service Users and Staff, and how this relates to increased costs at another end, of course they will not change these attitudes. Maybe some are not educated?
Feedback and evaluation should not be outsourced to binary systems operated by statisticians or others who never experienced the front line, because any evidence base that only asks Yes and No is missing context, breaking down complexity into departments and thereby creating cracks in the system, that exclude people with complex problems.
I truly believe that no-one who works for their living really likes 0 hour contracts.
Accountability for leaders would be a breath of fresh air, but there seems to be authority where that used to be.
This country is being run by school kids. We need a more productive workforce.
So before where they could say "your out, no explanation" now they can say "your out, you failed probation"
Yay?
Companies (bosses) will have to actually have to put effort in to new employees instead of exploiting them and firing them
Finally Angela in a job she will be be able to manage in a few months/ years
Journos are comedic the way they try to downplay government policies.
You can't have policy that is both pro business and pro workers. Their desires are mutually exclusive. It is not possible to pay workers more and less at the same time. It is also impossible to give people job security while also making it easier to for business to fire people. Every issue is the same, if it's good for workers it's bad for business and vice versa.
I wonder if Martin McTague is a Tory? If the headlines are going to be worrying just tell all the small businesses to stop reading the Daily Mail. Problem solved.
However chilling it is, if small businesses want to grow they need staff. Staff are people to be respected.
I wish there was some insurance sick pay for the self employed - maybe there is and I don't know about it?
Yes there is. Google it as there are several providers.
Yes those do exist, I believe they are called income protection insurance.
Narzi Labour policy = protocol 17 - keep the masses in poverty and perpetual work
Coming out of EU and now trying to coming out of ECHR.....will be blessing for Brits I suppose.
As always, the interest of businesses comes first. Stop exploiting working class.
a watered down bill sold out the worker to get donations cowards
An improvement but still tinkering round the edges with a lot of holes and gaps for companies to exploit. The biggest change in a generation? Maybe but that says more about the lack of change than the scale of this one. Overselling and underdelivering.
This is only going to get mutch worse than anyone can emagine we are loosing the brightest people in the UK they are going to to be leaving in there droves
5 more years of this debacle 🤦🏼♂️
2 years
Compared to the previous fourteen years, this is barely a concern.
A the next lot will be worse
5 more years of strengthening worker’s rights?
I hope so.
@@beckiebeckiebeckThe right to do as little as possible. That does not get economic growth
So those who now work for a boss are the boss 🤦🏻♂️
Welcome to an increase in unemployment.
It means that they have to make sure that employ the right person; ie do their job correctly.
So this means the cost of living goes even higher 😂
people said all the same things when Labour introduced the minimum wage back in the day, and none of it happened.
This idea that if someone else gains then you correspondingly lose, is an association not based in reality. This fallacy is used whenever politicians want to justify something they know is unpopular. After 14 years of austerity, you've just become accustomed to reading about it in news media owned by the top 1% in possession of half the world's wealth.
The cost of living crisis is because we have a dying currency we needed to adress the UK debt which is currently at 150 percent of debt to GDP and the currency has 1 percent of purchasing power left this is economics 101
Genuine question, if increasing the minimum wage doesn't put up overall costs for goods and services, can you explain where the money comes from to top up minimum wage? From where I stand that would only leave 2 other options, businesses make efficiencies and hire less staff to do the same amount of work (raising unemployment) or they absorb the cost by reducing profit margins (unlikely due to greed and impact on share price for larger businesses). Did I miss anything?
Can you explain how you think this will be the case? And how existing business law isn’t both a) helping business at the expense of workers while also b) still causing cost of living rises?
What a load of blurb she talks what she wants us to hear do they think this will make us like them no too little too late and it’s only a few months in.
Bunch of weirdos pretending of doing something yet doing noting. Lord Ali s puppets
Typical, once in power things get watered down from a previous stance of righteous anger and indignation about "putting things right". I get that business have their concerns, but surely even the smallest business want's to see the back of unfair and exploitative practices?? And a lead time of two years to implement whatever survives the legislative process? The next election will be just around the corner!!
Of course not they would do anything to keep costs down to increase profits/payout shareholders.
Look at Thames water, they had the dream a regional monopoly of millions of trapper consumers and all they had to do was the bare minimum of investment to keep away the government and they could of Sat back and watch the money pour in. But instead they hiked prices paid out the shareholders and bonuses to themselves and will now likely be renationalised.
Day 1 seems extreme, 6 months is great balance, 9 months seems to be pushing on too long. If a company needs 9 months to decide if someone is suitable for the job they are not serious.
We should do it based on income, anyone earning under 40k, 6 months. For high earners that may require longer time to yield results we could say 1 year or so.
Sounds great as long as workers don’t abuse the system.
This definitely doesn’t help small businesses. Labourer is only looking after unions in big companies.
No one cares about small business, very few incentives left anymore!
Too true! Their Union paymasters.
Workers can't abuse the system, the system is entirely rigged against them. Wage theft by employers is significant however, as is underpayment and breaches of employment law. The only side abusing the system is employers.
Don't know what that woman saying she only got £100 a month sick pay. SSP is £116 a week, still rubbish but more than job seekers allowance. Might get more from Universal Credit or Employment support allowance but then you don't have a job to go back to...
Four words- LAZY
Reminds me of the anti-immigrant ranter who claimed, "Immigrants are not working and taking our jobs at the same time!!" That blew my head off😅😅😅
that's 4 letters you sponge.
@@alpioozen
🤣🤣
People don't want to work nowadays. Think money grows on trees or the govt, just has to print more so they can watch reality TV shows at home or play games on the internet.
0:31 she looks like KELEBRIMBOR :D
So its better
Just told my boss I won’t be in tomorrow hahah
Why?
If the Working Class unites you know what will happen!?😊
It will never happen I'm afraid. They much prefer fighting amongst themselves.
They have nothing to lose but their chains.
@@moomin7461 It's impossible 😁
Rock my sox
"You'll hear, 'workers rights' nonsense, you have no rights. If you cannot negotiate your own wages to stay competitive then you have no rights. The union boss has taken your freedom" yuri bezmanov
Can you possibly explain how any one person has the leverage to negotiate with a company that can replace them quicker than they can find a new job at the terms they want?
Everybody should work 3 12 hour shifts on and then 3 off because it still works out at full time
7 days in a week.........
@@Calmdown1354 Totally depends on the type of work! Another employment theory thrown in the waste bin.........
@@Calmdown1354they can still do three on, three off. There being seven days in a week doesn't conflict with that.
@@RogerMellie-yk3gw It does for most people who just want a standard Mon-Fri days job. As 3 on 3 off is a shift pattern, which companies would normally use for 24hr cover. The average person doesn't want do this, as they would loose their weekends. I believe only around 14% of the country currently does shift work. A 4 day week would make more sense, and I imagine a lot of people probably do that now anyway in office based roles.
@@RogerMellie-yk3gw It does for most people who just want a standard Mon-Fri days job. As 3 on 3 off is a shift pattern, which is something companies would normally use for 24hr cover. The average person doesn't want do this, as they would loose their weekends. I believe only around 14% of the country currently does shift work. A 4 day week would make more sense, and I imagine a lot of people do this already.
well the first person didnt even speak english smh
Angela is a talented minister with stunning curves, she's already a ready-made queen. Charles should take a closer look at her portfolio. What a beautiful speech in classic language; she doesn't miss a single sound. Everything hisses, buzzes, and moves - she's a real ball of immense energy.