curryvid See this isn't the theorizer this is actually his evil twin know as the theorizer 2. He was running the second channel until he got fed up with his mere 2nd place and lack of subscribers. So he trained lily the theorizer's cat to slowly drive the theorizer crazy and unstable. Then when the time was right he struck leaving him disabled. However the theorizer 2 could not bring himself to kill the original. So he placed him on a computer with a crappy animation software and a text to speech program. Now he runs the CP channel, forever crying in despair that someone would help him. But unable to say it because Lily now edits the CP videos before they are posted, and if she reads something she doesn't like she attacks
in ancient Egyptian lore, the preservation of the face was important for the souls to recognize the body they had come from in the first place. for the realistic replications of a person or the original body with the face recognizable the original spirit would be able to return to what they recognized as themselves. as for the ones that have no historical refrences i am not sure but those modeled off of another person the models soul may find its way to the sculpture.
so they will find there way back to what best resembles them, or the souls that are forced are the ones that are the best match to what they take up. i am talking about ancient Egyptian myth as it applies to how things would happen with the tablet. it also does not account for those with out a face but perhaps the subject was familiar to the forced spirit. the point is the soul will seek out what is familiar to it even if forced by the tablet over what is not familiar.
Here's a movie idk if anyone here's heard of, but it's called Flushed Away. I'd kind of like to know if Roddy actually could have survived the flush and the origins of the millions of tadpoles supposedly set up to repopulate the rat city. Just a suggestion :)
I always thought the sculptures wax or stone or painting whatever are "creations" they are the product of an artist who literally put their soul into it. The passion and love for the art work gives it a soul to claim. And most artist will research a piece like Teddy to ensure he captures his "essence" so it made sense. The mummified remains of the Egyptians were done with love and passion by their servants the same thing applies. Its the power of the artist desire to create that does it.
Stephanie Galtieri that's a really good idea. That explains why rex acts like a dog, the museum curators that assembled must have had an inside joke. And the fictional characters, plus why people who would have seen some sh*t are happy.
Finally someone makes a theory about Night at the Museum! I love the first Night at the Museum but that's probably because of nostalgia and that I thinks It's a pretty funny comedy but the other Night at the Museum movies were pretty meh.
The second one was horrid. The last one was good. honestly, Akhmenrah needed a bigger part, in all of them. Or at least the first 2. there's so much more he could have added to the story. And, since it was HIS tablet that had the powers, it's unfortunate that his character was not touched on more.
See this isn't the theorizer this is actually his evil twin know as the theorizer 2. He was running the second channel until he got fed up with his mere 2nd place and lack of subscribers. So he trained lily the theorizer's cat to slowly drive the theorizer crazy and unstable. Then when the time was right he struck leaving him disabled. However the theorizer 2 could not bring himself to kill the original. So he placed him on a computer with a crappy animation software and a text to speech program. Now he runs the CP channel, forever crying in despair that someone would help him. But unable to say it because Lily now edits the CP videos before they are posted, and if she reads something she doesn't like she attacks.
Does this mean we (or at least the movie) live in a Consequential Nexus? It’s a theory in astrophysics that says that people from the future came to the past and did something that is directly or indirectly responsible for the events of the present. In this case, - Larry falls into the painting - Goes into the past - Accidentally drops his Motorola cellphone (meaning this was an indirect consequence) - Joey Motorola finds it - Joey dissects it and replicated it to the best of his ability (obviously into the first Motorola cellphone) - Larry creates the Motorola Company - Motorola Co. builds and sells updated cellphones. - Motorola Co. builds the present day Motorola phone - Larry buys it - Larry falls into the past - Larry drops the modern Motorola for Joey to find and restart the loop. The consequence: The creation of Motorola Co. and the Cellphone
See this isn't the theorizer this is actually his evil twin know as the theorizer 2. He was running the second channel until he got fed up with his mere 2nd place and lack of subscribers. So he trained lily the theorizer's cat to slowly drive the theorizer crazy and unstable. Then when the time was right he struck leaving him disabled. However the theorizer 2 could not bring himself to kill the original. So he placed him on a computer with a crappy animation software and a text to speech program. Now he runs the CP channel, forever crying in despair that someone would help him. But unable to say it because Lily now edits the CP videos before they are posted, and if she reads something she doesn't like she attacks
I thought that the characters and the paintings were given their souls based on the stories told around them and the emotions and feelings of people who viewed them. The smithsonian statues have had people telling their life stories and hundreds of thousands of people thinking about them and imbuing them with their life and experiences so they embody those stories and romanticized versions of themselves.
I think he explained that. The tablet does many things, time travel, animation (the magic kind, not the film kind) transformation and putting dead souls back in things, corpses, statues, bobbleheads, doesn't matter.
+Mason RobertsTV Moon Knight is a Marvel Superhero who's origin relies on being killed in Egypt and coming back to life by the Egyptian Moon god Khonshu. Khonshu made him his Knight of Vengeance and gave Marc Spector (Moon Knight) the power of increase strength and agility (similar to the old night watchmen in the film). Moon Knight's sole purpose now is to protect the original Statue of Khonshu from being destroyed. He also once used Khonshu's resurrecting powers to bring The Black Panther back to life.
+ Mason RobertsTV Oh and in Egyptian Mythology, the moon god DOES NOT have the ability to bring things back to life but can heal people. HOWEVER, Marvel's Moon Knight moon god CAN resurrect people same with his powers. The Egyptian Mythology moon god CAN'T give people increase strength or agility, but Marvel's Moon Knight moon god CAN. So they were probably inspired by Moon Knight comics when writing the script.
+Demon Knight Dean Those articles are false, James Gunn wants to make a Moon Knight film but Marvel Studios wont let him do it. By far Moon Knight is Marvel's most interesting superhero being inspired by Warren's Vampirella and having Marvel's best Villain roster. If you want a story about a Superhero dealing with depression from civilians not appreciating his help, Evil Dead story BEFORE Evil Dead was a thing (all his friends and family want to kill him), a child abuse story in which an angry mob wants Moon Knight to kill a child who is suffering from abusive trauma (killed a priest as a result) Moon Knight refuses but the kid punches him in the face causing Moon Knight to snap the boy's neck as a result, and Moon Knight's most popular villain "The Black Spectre" who's only goal is to commit crimes to become famous since he does not want to be forgotten when he dies as his friends, family, son, and wife has forgotten him.
the tablet could create fake souls based on the object it brings to life if the object is something that does not exist e.g darth vader while pulling souls from the afterlife for things that do exist e.g teddy rosevelt. Or if you take the multivers theory into account the tablet could work on the miltiversal level when it comes to objects that don't exists but in a limited way. such as the darth vader replica not being able to use the force beucase of the fake body.
Did anyone else notice that the Kahmunrah we see in NatM 2: BotS Isn't the real deal. When the tablet is out of play he doesn't decompose like we see Ahkmenrah do in the third movie, he just freezes. Anyone else wondering where his corpse is? Was he buried with his family and if so why isn't he with them at the British Museum , or is he in some other museum? Do his actions as a wax figure reflect his actions as a living person? Idk. One more thing! Does anyone know how Ahkmenrah died? From what I remember it's never specified, and the only theories I've come across are: Kahmunrah killed him to get to the throne, or that he was a sickly child which explains his youthfulness.... Okay I lied, Last thing (I promise). When we see Merenkahre is wearing what looks to be a mix of the Deshret and the Khepresh while Ahkmenrah wears the Deshret, and Kahmunrah wears what appears to be a bedazzled Khepresh. The Deshret is the crown worn by the rulers of lower Egypt, and the Khepresh is worn by rulers who are at war. I have no clue why Merenkahre's crown looks like that, maybe he was at war but maintained his status over lower Egypt and died while still at war. Ahkmenrah most likely would have brought peace or finished his father's war which explains the fact that he doesn't wear a Khepresh. I'm pretty sure Kahmunrah would've been an outcast Pharaoh and would've had to fight to remain in his position which is why he doesn't have the Deshret. Sorry for the long post.
I'm guessing Kahmunrah was a wax figure they made to put next to his gate originally but they abandoned him and put him in storage and seeing as he was the evil member of the family I'm guessing he might have been denied burial with the family which could explain why he's Hank Azaria because he is many things but Egyptian is not one of them
Caleb Mayfield Rami is of Egyptian descent though, his parents are Egyptian so him being cast as an Egyptian works. Meanwhile Hank is descended from Greece and Spain. I loved him in Night At The Museum 2 but him being the odd one out was probably intentional as he’s the only member of the family who’s not a revived corpse
I think Ahkmenrah was based off King Tut, so maybe he died the same way as him, which still is in debate, like murder by another political rival or disease.
I personally think that Kahmunrah froze in the morning because the makers of the movie didn't actually think very much into the lore, and they probably thought that it wouldn't be very family friendly to have a dude's dead body on the floor. I'm pretty sure that the Kahmunrah in the Smithsonian is the real Kahmunrah, though. The makers of the movie just didn't think it through too much. Also, I, too, think that Kahmunrah killed his brother, but I also think he killed their parents, too. I mean, all three of them were buried in the same tomb, so it would kinda make sense.
Oddly enough, the person Octavius was based off of, Gaius Octavius Thurinus, was not alive when Pompeii happened. He should not have known- unless he saw it online. He could, however, know that the city was Roman- all Roman cities were built in the same way, so he could easily feel it.
1. That laugh at the end was ear-rape.. My ears should file a lawsuit. :( 2. I always assumed it was something similar to how you described it, though I lacked the end-credit scene to confirm it. Basically what I thought was, "The tablet searches for what it thinks _should_ be alive but isn't." What I don't get is why they freeze come daytime. Is it _solely due to being powered by Thoth, or is there something else? Do the souls _still_ require rest periods for their newfound vessels? Is Ra trying to counter it? Is _another_ god/dess trying to? He's associated with the moon (atleast) partly because the ibis looks like a crescent moon, and he's the patron of magic and wisdom, so it would stand to reason that, while _yes,_ spells in his name would be STRONGEST with the moon in the sky, it _should_ last beyond dawn. Especially so if the one that initially channeled that power was worth their salt _as_ a priest/wizard/etcetera, and not some two-bit street magician.
Warriors Firepelt2002 See this isn't the theorizer this is actually his evil twin know as the theorizer 2. He was running the second channel until he got fed up with his mere 2nd place and lack of subscribers. So he trained lily the theorizer's cat to slowly drive the theorizer crazy and unstable. Then when the time was right he struck leaving him disabled. However the theorizer 2 could not bring himself to kill the original. So he placed him on a computer with a crappy animation software and a text to speech program. Now he runs the CP channel, forever crying in despair that someone would help him. But unable to say it because Lily now edits the CP videos before they are posted, and if she reads something she doesn't like she attacks
Actually, the tablet’s power /does/ last beyond dawn because those brought to life remember the events of the day. However, the tablet doesn’t have the power to fully animate them after dawn. At least, that’s what I think.
This actually explains a lot. I just binged the first two movies again. Can’t find the third one yet but this makes sense in the origins of the power. Also, something to note about the moon god in question. This power only activates at night with the moon god. The name of the god, Khonsu, literally translates to “traveler”. His duty was, among other things, was to watch over travelers of the night. In essence the moon god watched over the spirits that came to life again.
Darth Vader, the Grouch and other fictional characters ARE themselves as well! If the Tablet not only brings things back to life & copy/pastes souls into anything that should own it AND it can turn paintings into portals in time, would it be so out of the question that it can also bridge the gap between realities...? Thankfully, Vader is limited by either the Tablet, the laws of this reality or his false body, preventing him from using the Force and taking over the world...
DO NOT BRING ANY ANIME OR VIDEOGAMES NEAR THE TABLET!!! (specifically DBZ, Gurren Lagaan, Attack on Titan, God Eater, Dead Space & Monster Hunter... just to name a few...)
Meanwhile me thinking what no one else is thinking: Are Star Wars and night at the museum in the same universe?! Because why would they make a wax fight of a movie character.
I was also pretty much thinking the same thing, I also like to think that this is how the toys in Toy Story come to life as well, but that's a complex idea for another time. If you're looking to do comedy, why not try out Idiocracy and see what you can theorize from that film. :)
This video debunks itself. How can it be the real souls of people if 1. Non real characters come to life, and 2. They don't remember the memories of other myseums, yet they remmber the memories of their past lives? . But it's not that complicated. The tablets bring the souls back to the corpses, but everything else just turns into whatever it is representing. Heck, maybe not even that. Maybe their lives are in their imagination feeding off of the information they hear about the characters they represent.
RATING OF THE NIGHT AT THE MUSEUM MOVIES (Worst to Best): Night at the Museum: Secret of the Tomb Night at the Museum Night at the Museum: Battle at the Smithsonian
I feel like you're having more and more fun with these as time goes on. Maybe that's just my perception because I started watching your channel after finding the coraline videos which seemed more serious.
They aren’t the real people and they don’t claim to be. The tablet doesn’t put souls into them, just makes them come to life and live as the characters they were created to be like. Kahmunrah is not his real body, he is a wax figure if Kahmunrah, unlike his family who are the corpses resurrected. Also, Ahkmenrah wasn’t in a museum when he learned English, he was on display in Cambridge university. What I’d like to know is what does the tablet say? I roughly translated it and it seems to mention about how the tablet came to be and also mentions the sun god and other gods like Thoth. And where did they get Pi out of it in the 2nd movie?
I personally think alot of the reason that this stuff doesn't make sense is just because the writers didn't put a whole bunch of thought into the lore of the series. It's easier for people to just theorize and have things stay unconfirmed. There are all kinds of plot holes and stuff in this series. Which makes me sad, because I, too, overanalyze the lore and stuff of movies and TV shows I love, but hey, there's nothing I can do about it. There's nothing any of us can do about it, really.
Here is something I don't understand. How would the tablet understand what to put what soul in? Like why wouldn't it make the the Teddy Roosevelt wax sculptor into a volcano, and the volcano model into Teddy? Also, how would it know to treat one picture as a way to go back in time, and another a fictional place?
The Night At The Museum Trilogy may have its reasons but regardless of what or how to me I feel myself not of this world myself when one has many lives before and after and how we feel that becomes the real deal is beyond what we hold most dear
That last point you made about no living beings having statues that come to life is interesting to me, because in the third movie there technically IS a statue of Larry. Laar the Caveman was modelled after him and comes to life the same as everyone else, but seems to immediately recognise Larry as his father and has, whilst not the greatest intellect, far more social and mental awareness than the other cavemen we see in the series. Did the tablet create an entirely new soul for Laar, then? Or is it a cheap imitation of Larry’s?
I think Joey invented the phone in the normal timeline but when he had a run in with the night guard, he shifted time to be faster than it was supposed to be
I always believes this but I went with the statues of fictional characters revealing to Larry despite him not realising that these creatures did in fact exist and were apart of history such as cupids, half hawk people, giant Chinese snakes , winged lion bodies creatures with head of the kings of the ruler of Assyria and e.t c. also they found out about current events cause of the realm their spirits reside. also who hated this awesome series
he keeps saying that teddy has half of the real soul, but there aren't any other teddy roosevelts (spelled that wrong) in the museum and the tablet only effects the museum that its in.
I will never experience laughter the same ever again. That was a little funny though. It got a giggle out of me. BTW, love the channel! Keep those videos coming!
Manuel Blumenstein See this isn't the theorizer this is actually his evil twin know as the theorizer 2. He was running the second channel until he got fed up with his mere 2nd place and lack of subscribers. So he trained lily the theorizer's cat to slowly drive the theorizer crazy and unstable. Then when the time was right he struck leaving him disabled. However the theorizer 2 could not bring himself to kill the original. So he placed him on a computer with a crappy animation software and a text to speech program. Now he runs the CP channel, forever crying in despair that someone would help him. But unable to say it because Lily now edits the CP videos before they are posted, and if she reads something she doesn't like she attacks
I always wondered whether or not the wax sculptures do in fact carry the souls of the people they represent. If that's the case, then the Amelia Earhart sculpture would be able to tell people what really happened to her plane. lol
If I could posite... Have you considered Tsukumogami? Things that have been used and repaired for years gaining spirits/souls of their own due to the use and love they've gone through. Perhaps that is an explanation for the objects/sculptures/fictional characters that couldn't be reincarnated?
I can help you on the theory why non existent artefacts were brought to life by the tablet too. The thing is that we humans gave these pieces of artefact a soul with our made up thoughts on creating and sculpting each character until it seemingly has its own soul. Notice how even the easter statue from the first move comes to life is probably easily explained that some children who visited the place created a story or the character upon it. Like you said, these statues can remember things even without the tablet or them coming to life. I believe if at least a person think that artefact is alive, the tablet can alter and give the soul to the artefact itself. What do you think? It could probably help you in your part 2 (if you are ever going to make one that is which i hope you will :3) Love your channel btw ❤
.........I've been watching your videos for years. You are a comfort creator of mine. Your theories have given me something to think about and focus on through very hard parts of my life when I needed escape. So I say this with much love and respect; I'm gonna need you to NEVER laugh like that again.
when i was rewatching the 2nd movie, When Kamunrah was talking to Ivan the Terrible, Napoleon, and Al capone, when he said "You are all the most fear leaders of all of history" and I was like wait, did they forget to put Hitler?
At 2:09 their is actually a simple answer to this when you have knowledge of Egyptian Mythos. According to ancient Egyptians the soul is separated into 5 parts. 1) Ba represents a person's personality. 2) Ib is the heart. 3)Ka is your life force. 4) Ren your whole identity also referenced as your secret name. 5) Sheut is your shadow. Also means statue. Your confused as to why your shadow is part of your soul? The Egyptians believe that your shadow is a sign of the impact you made in this life. Much like a statue of a famous president. It was also believe that if you know the right spell, you basically revive a person with their shadow and a statue.
Are you talking shit about my boy Oscar the Grouch in my boy Darth Vader saying that they ain't real I guess me and Vader , Oscar going to have to break some legs
Wait a moment! So what you're saying is that if there was a wax figure of a current real life person, let's say Lady Gaga, then that figure wouldn't come to life? I kinda feel like it definately would, but maybe it would split the soul like with the Einsteins.
Here's how i rank the night at the museum films best to worst on a scale of 1 to 100: 1) night at the museum (2006) 56/100 2) night at the museum 3 (2014) 48/100 3) night at the museum 2 (2009) 35/100
That was a very eerie laugh but the theory is well done. I think you're on to something here. Too bad they can't make another one, now that the great comedian Robin Williams has passed. But this theory has great points and good ones at that.
Here's a thought: Think of the Tablet as the Akashic Records, if you've heard of those, the sort of spiritual/existential record keeping of all activity in the cosmos. Build an accurate image of a being and the tablet projects a personality upon that image dependant in accuracy upon how much that image resembles the being it is meant to represent. It's the same reason "Speaking the Name of a Being" in occult magic is thought to summon that being, and building an image of that being summons it moreso. The record keeping of the cosmos bundles like with like, so when you create an image, you sort of "Summon" all that resembles or is associated with that image, to that image. Night at the Museum is just... well, an extreme case, I suppose.
the way i always saw it was the tablet brings back corpses with their original soles but grants new soles to the wax figures but gives them the memories the real person had at the moment that statue is depicting so characters like Rex and Ahkmenra are able to remember everything up until their there deaths but wax sculptures like Teddy and Amelia are only able to remember till the moment that the sculpture is depicting. so when a sculpture comes to life for the first time its like they have been yanked out of that point in time and placed in the present day
In the 2nd movie, the tablet was in the Smithsonian, then back to the NYC museum. So do the figures & statues that came alive in the Smithsonian during the 2nd film become frozen forever or are they able to still move in the night despite the tablet is in another place?
Random time What's your fav franchise 🍟 = mc Donald 👧🏼= Wendy's 🍔 = Burger King 🍗 =chic fa le ⭐️ = Walmart 🍜 = subway 🍣 = any Chinese restaurant 🥗 = salad co
maybe it's because the bones aren't real? I heard a while ago that when they make those skeletons the bones they use are often fake, which makes a lot of sense when you think about it.
I’m gonna say it.
Night at the Museum is the most underrated trilogy of all time
AGREED
I’ve never agreed with a statement more in my WHOLE EXISTENCE
9:40 That was the scariest laugh I have ever heard.
curryvid See this isn't the theorizer this is actually his evil twin know as the theorizer 2. He was running the second channel until he got fed up with his mere 2nd place and lack of subscribers. So he trained lily the theorizer's cat to slowly drive the theorizer crazy and unstable. Then when the time was right he struck leaving him disabled. However the theorizer 2 could not bring himself to kill the original. So he placed him on a computer with a crappy animation software and a text to speech program. Now he runs the CP channel, forever crying in despair that someone would help him. But unable to say it because Lily now edits the CP videos before they are posted, and if she reads something she doesn't like she attacks
AND IT WAS SO LOUD OMG
Yes in deed, he should do horror villains
curryvid a really funny evil laugh
When you hear a jockey
Why don't people like the film
I love the series
El Grando Smokio True
Personally I found it boreing. :/
Ward Junior the first one the best 2 3 are better good
The only important parts to this series is Ahkmenrah, let's be honest. He's so under appreciated.
Ward Junior people are allowed an opinion
This would cause a problem though, what about Rexy? he doesn't act much like a T-rex when he comes to life, but more like a dog.
I'm pretty sure you can't actually prove that dinosaurs didn't act like that but idk
@Kyle Kern this makes sense so that's why the Triceratops tries to Ram people correct?
in ancient Egyptian lore, the preservation of the face was important for the souls to recognize the body they had come from in the first place. for the realistic replications of a person or the original body with the face recognizable the original spirit would be able to return to what they recognized as themselves. as for the ones that have no historical refrences i am not sure but those modeled off of another person the models soul may find its way to the sculpture.
Sean Rea theybdont find their way in it their put in it forcfully by the tablet.
so they will find there way back to what best resembles them, or the souls that are forced are the ones that are the best match to what they take up. i am talking about ancient Egyptian myth as it applies to how things would happen with the tablet. it also does not account for those with out a face but perhaps the subject was familiar to the forced spirit. the point is the soul will seek out what is familiar to it even if forced by the tablet over what is not familiar.
Whoa, that actually makes a lot of sense.
And what about those those faceless soldiers from the first movie?
Dino li
Probably it works the same way as the fictional characters
Here's a movie idk if anyone here's heard of, but it's called Flushed Away. I'd kind of like to know if Roddy actually could have survived the flush and the origins of the millions of tadpoles supposedly set up to repopulate the rat city. Just a suggestion :)
Yeah I loved that movie
Evangelina Voma yeah that'd be a good theory
Our family has literally turned it into a meme:
Kensington? THE ROYAL BOROUGH?
U P T O P ?
I love that movie
*ohmygodyourepliedmylifeiscompletethankyougoodbye.*
I always thought the sculptures wax or stone or painting whatever are "creations" they are the product of an artist who literally put their soul into it. The passion and love for the art work gives it a soul to claim. And most artist will research a piece like Teddy to ensure he captures his "essence" so it made sense. The mummified remains of the Egyptians were done with love and passion by their servants the same thing applies. Its the power of the artist desire to create that does it.
Stephanie Galtieri that's a really good idea. That explains why rex acts like a dog, the museum curators that assembled must have had an inside joke. And the fictional characters, plus why people who would have seen some sh*t are happy.
What about the Einstein models, lovingly created by the injection molding machine?
Vyl Bird yes. That is why they all act the SAME almost as if “stamped “ out carbon copy
Finally someone makes a theory about Night at the Museum! I love the first Night at the Museum but that's probably because of nostalgia and that I thinks It's a pretty funny comedy but the other Night at the Museum movies were pretty meh.
Limegreenhulk 52 I thought the second one was pretty decent, but I didn’t really like the third
Macayla Yeah the second one is definitely the better sequel.
I liked the 2nd one so much it inspired me to do a history project on Amelia Earhart.
What? No, the third one is the better sequel. The emotional scenes actually landed.
The second one was horrid. The last one was good. honestly, Akhmenrah needed a bigger part, in all of them. Or at least the first 2. there's so much more he could have added to the story. And, since it was HIS tablet that had the powers, it's unfortunate that his character was not touched on more.
Talking with my dad and suddenly a big *HAHAHAHAHAHA* noise is heard.
Please, do not laugh Like that EVER again...please, my ears are bleeding
Tiki Master
My eyes are bleeding from reading this comment 🔥🔥🔥
I second the motion.
I third it
See this isn't the theorizer this is actually his evil twin know as the theorizer 2. He was running the second channel until he got fed up with his mere 2nd place and lack of subscribers. So he trained lily the theorizer's cat to slowly drive the theorizer crazy and unstable. Then when the time was right he struck leaving him disabled. However the theorizer 2 could not bring himself to kill the original. So he placed him on a computer with a crappy animation software and a text to speech program. Now he runs the CP channel, forever crying in despair that someone would help him. But unable to say it because Lily now edits the CP videos before they are posted, and if she reads something she doesn't like she attacks.
Still better than that robotic voice in the backgrounds
Does this mean we (or at least the movie) live in a Consequential Nexus?
It’s a theory in astrophysics that says that people from the future came to the past and did something that is directly or indirectly responsible for the events of the present.
In this case,
- Larry falls into the painting
- Goes into the past
- Accidentally drops his Motorola cellphone (meaning this was an indirect consequence)
- Joey Motorola finds it
- Joey dissects it and replicated it to the best of his ability (obviously into the first Motorola cellphone)
- Larry creates the Motorola Company
- Motorola Co. builds and sells updated cellphones.
- Motorola Co. builds the present day Motorola phone
- Larry buys it
- Larry falls into the past
- Larry drops the modern Motorola for Joey to find and restart the loop.
The consequence: The creation of Motorola Co. and the Cellphone
That was a creepy laugh please don't do it again.
See this isn't the theorizer this is actually his evil twin know as the theorizer 2. He was running the second channel until he got fed up with his mere 2nd place and lack of subscribers. So he trained lily the theorizer's cat to slowly drive the theorizer crazy and unstable. Then when the time was right he struck leaving him disabled. However the theorizer 2 could not bring himself to kill the original. So he placed him on a computer with a crappy animation software and a text to speech program. Now he runs the CP channel, forever crying in despair that someone would help him. But unable to say it because Lily now edits the CP videos before they are posted, and if she reads something she doesn't like she attacks
superphantom100 I think he should do it again
I thought that the characters and the paintings were given their souls based on the stories told around them and the emotions and feelings of people who viewed them. The smithsonian statues have had people telling their life stories and hundreds of thousands of people thinking about them and imbuing them with their life and experiences so they embody those stories and romanticized versions of themselves.
You have no idea how long I've been waiting for this is literally my favorite movie
His name is octavius but ok
*Octavius
NightcoreVortex happy ? If you read my comment below, i already got that but ok
The golden tablet looks liike it cpuld be an Scp
But Akhmenrah isn’t a wax sculpture, he’s a mummy.
I think he explained that. The tablet does many things, time travel, animation (the magic kind, not the film kind) transformation and putting dead souls back in things, corpses, statues, bobbleheads, doesn't matter.
@@alexthegreat8001 Oh ok, thank you :)
FINALLY! You took your sweet time making this.
The Sad truth is, the Night at the Museum Film Franchise is the closest thing we have to a Marvel Moon Knight movie.
RamsTheNameCom how?
+Mason RobertsTV Moon Knight is a Marvel Superhero who's origin relies on being killed in Egypt and coming back to life by the Egyptian Moon god Khonshu. Khonshu made him his Knight of Vengeance and gave Marc Spector (Moon Knight) the power of increase strength and agility (similar to the old night watchmen in the film). Moon Knight's sole purpose now is to protect the original Statue of Khonshu from being destroyed. He also once used Khonshu's resurrecting powers to bring The Black Panther back to life.
+ Mason RobertsTV Oh and in Egyptian Mythology, the moon god DOES NOT have the ability to bring things back to life but can heal people. HOWEVER, Marvel's Moon Knight moon god CAN resurrect people same with his powers. The Egyptian Mythology moon god CAN'T give people increase strength or agility, but Marvel's Moon Knight moon god CAN. So they were probably inspired by Moon Knight comics when writing the script.
xD
+Demon Knight Dean Those articles are false, James Gunn wants to make a Moon Knight film but Marvel Studios wont let him do it. By far Moon Knight is Marvel's most interesting superhero being inspired by Warren's Vampirella and having Marvel's best Villain roster. If you want a story about a Superhero dealing with depression from civilians not appreciating his help, Evil Dead story BEFORE Evil Dead was a thing (all his friends and family want to kill him), a child abuse story in which an angry mob wants Moon Knight to kill a child who is suffering from abusive trauma (killed a priest as a result) Moon Knight refuses but the kid punches him in the face causing Moon Knight to snap the boy's neck as a result, and Moon Knight's most popular villain "The Black Spectre" who's only goal is to commit crimes to become famous since he does not want to be forgotten when he dies as his friends, family, son, and wife has forgotten him.
I've been waiting for this I love this movie.
Nonya Business me too its my fav magic movie
Nonya Business I love one and two. I don't care for 3.
FozzieatDetour BillNye 3rd one kinda confused me
Caleb Mayfield I was just confused
I liked it
But I didn’t understand it completely
the tablet could create fake souls based on the object it brings to life if the object is something that does not exist e.g darth vader while pulling souls from the afterlife for things that do exist e.g teddy rosevelt.
Or if you take the multivers theory into account the tablet could work on the miltiversal level when it comes to objects that don't exists but in a limited way. such as the darth vader replica not being able to use the force beucase of the fake body.
"Phones wouldn't exist without Ben Stiller"" 😂😂😂😂😂
Did anyone else notice that the Kahmunrah we see in NatM 2: BotS Isn't the real deal. When the tablet is out of play he doesn't decompose like we see Ahkmenrah do in the third movie, he just freezes. Anyone else wondering where his corpse is? Was he buried with his family and if so why isn't he with them at the British Museum , or is he in some other museum? Do his actions as a wax figure reflect his actions as a living person? Idk. One more thing! Does anyone know how Ahkmenrah died? From what I remember it's never specified, and the only theories I've come across are: Kahmunrah killed him to get to the throne, or that he was a sickly child which explains his youthfulness.... Okay I lied, Last thing (I promise). When we see Merenkahre is wearing what looks to be a mix of the Deshret and the Khepresh while Ahkmenrah wears the Deshret, and Kahmunrah wears what appears to be a bedazzled Khepresh. The Deshret is the crown worn by the rulers of lower Egypt, and the Khepresh is worn by rulers who are at war. I have no clue why Merenkahre's crown looks like that, maybe he was at war but maintained his status over lower Egypt and died while still at war. Ahkmenrah most likely would have brought peace or finished his father's war which explains the fact that he doesn't wear a Khepresh. I'm pretty sure Kahmunrah would've been an outcast Pharaoh and would've had to fight to remain in his position which is why he doesn't have the Deshret. Sorry for the long post.
I'm guessing Kahmunrah was a wax figure they made to put next to his gate originally but they abandoned him and put him in storage and seeing as he was the evil member of the family I'm guessing he might have been denied burial with the family which could explain why he's Hank Azaria because he is many things but Egyptian is not one of them
Caleb Mayfield Rami is of Egyptian descent though, his parents are Egyptian so him being cast as an Egyptian works. Meanwhile Hank is descended from Greece and Spain. I loved him in Night At The Museum 2 but him being the odd one out was probably intentional as he’s the only member of the family who’s not a revived corpse
Both models brought to life
I think Ahkmenrah was based off King Tut, so maybe he died the same way as him, which still is in debate, like murder by another political rival or disease.
I personally think that Kahmunrah froze in the morning because the makers of the movie didn't actually think very much into the lore, and they probably thought that it wouldn't be very family friendly to have a dude's dead body on the floor. I'm pretty sure that the Kahmunrah in the Smithsonian is the real Kahmunrah, though. The makers of the movie just didn't think it through too much. Also, I, too, think that Kahmunrah killed his brother, but I also think he killed their parents, too. I mean, all three of them were buried in the same tomb, so it would kinda make sense.
4:44 "It's Octavius, Mary."
Great video btw. Love Night at the Museum.
All the dislikes are people who are jelly because of the theorizer's laugh
Dinosaurs are just cute little puppies!!!
Oddly enough, the person Octavius was based off of, Gaius Octavius Thurinus, was not alive when Pompeii happened. He should not have known- unless he saw it online. He could, however, know that the city was Roman- all Roman cities were built in the same way, so he could easily feel it.
The ending scared the shit out of me
Same
Me too
@@sauclygust8684 The comments said the laugh was the worst thing ever, so I was anticipating it and so now I don't see what the problem was.
1. That laugh at the end was ear-rape.. My ears should file a lawsuit. :(
2. I always assumed it was something similar to how you described it, though I lacked the end-credit scene to confirm it. Basically what I thought was, "The tablet searches for what it thinks _should_ be alive but isn't." What I don't get is why they freeze come daytime. Is it _solely due to being powered by Thoth, or is there something else? Do the souls _still_ require rest periods for their newfound vessels? Is Ra trying to counter it? Is _another_ god/dess trying to?
He's associated with the moon (atleast) partly because the ibis looks like a crescent moon, and he's the patron of magic and wisdom, so it would stand to reason that, while _yes,_ spells in his name would be STRONGEST with the moon in the sky, it _should_ last beyond dawn. Especially so if the one that initially channeled that power was worth their salt _as_ a priest/wizard/etcetera, and not some two-bit street magician.
Cekseiro lol ear rape
Warriors Firepelt2002 See this isn't the theorizer this is actually his evil twin know as the theorizer 2. He was running the second channel until he got fed up with his mere 2nd place and lack of subscribers. So he trained lily the theorizer's cat to slowly drive the theorizer crazy and unstable. Then when the time was right he struck leaving him disabled. However the theorizer 2 could not bring himself to kill the original. So he placed him on a computer with a crappy animation software and a text to speech program. Now he runs the CP channel, forever crying in despair that someone would help him. But unable to say it because Lily now edits the CP videos before they are posted, and if she reads something she doesn't like she attacks
Actually, the tablet’s power /does/ last beyond dawn because those brought to life remember the events of the day. However, the tablet doesn’t have the power to fully animate them after dawn. At least, that’s what I think.
Cekseiro because Khonsu is the moon God, his power only works by the light of the moon, that is why they only come to life at night.
Khonsu is the moon god, Thoth is the god of knowledge,
This actually explains a lot. I just binged the first two movies again. Can’t find the third one yet but this makes sense in the origins of the power. Also, something to note about the moon god in question. This power only activates at night with the moon god. The name of the god, Khonsu, literally translates to “traveler”. His duty was, among other things, was to watch over travelers of the night. In essence the moon god watched over the spirits that came to life again.
Darth Vader, the Grouch and other fictional characters ARE themselves as well! If the Tablet not only brings things back to life & copy/pastes souls into anything that should own it AND it can turn paintings into portals in time, would it be so out of the question that it can also bridge the gap between realities...?
Thankfully, Vader is limited by either the Tablet, the laws of this reality or his false body, preventing him from using the Force and taking over the world...
DO NOT BRING ANY ANIME OR VIDEOGAMES NEAR THE TABLET!!! (specifically DBZ, Gurren Lagaan, Attack on Titan, God Eater, Dead Space & Monster Hunter... just to name a few...)
@@Kyzoren I just did oops
The force is like magic
OK, YES!
Meanwhile me thinking what no one else is thinking: Are Star Wars and night at the museum in the same universe?! Because why would they make a wax fight of a movie character.
I was also pretty much thinking the same thing, I also like to think that this is how the toys in Toy Story come to life as well, but that's a complex idea for another time.
If you're looking to do comedy, why not try out Idiocracy and see what you can theorize from that film. :)
Frostyflytrap i LOVE THAT MOVIE
This video debunks itself. How can it be the real souls of people if 1. Non real characters come to life, and 2. They don't remember the memories of other myseums, yet they remmber the memories of their past lives?
.
But it's not that complicated. The tablets bring the souls back to the corpses, but everything else just turns into whatever it is representing. Heck, maybe not even that. Maybe their lives are in their imagination feeding off of the information they hear about the characters they represent.
I love the Night in the Museum movies! They're all amazing but my personal favourite is the second one, the battle scene towards the end.
Plus all the characters who showed up made it great
RATING OF THE NIGHT AT THE MUSEUM MOVIES (Worst to Best):
Night at the Museum: Secret of the Tomb
Night at the Museum
Night at the Museum: Battle at the Smithsonian
I feel like you're having more and more fun with these as time goes on. Maybe that's just my perception because I started watching your channel after finding the coraline videos which seemed more serious.
This one I'm having fun with (only at the end) because the film is a comedy, albeit a mysterious one
10,700 subscribers left, so proud of you. 😁
A theory based on Pennywise the Clown, a.k.a, IT?.......
Demon Knight Dean imagine the tablet in a museum with fictional horror characters like chucky, kruger, vooheeres, jigsaw, pennywise, annabelle, etc.
guccitears x yes
😧
@Caleb Mayfield
1. to give a horror scenario
2. to be detailed
They aren’t the real people and they don’t claim to be. The tablet doesn’t put souls into them, just makes them come to life and live as the characters they were created to be like. Kahmunrah is not his real body, he is a wax figure if Kahmunrah, unlike his family who are the corpses resurrected. Also, Ahkmenrah wasn’t in a museum when he learned English, he was on display in Cambridge university. What I’d like to know is what does the tablet say? I roughly translated it and it seems to mention about how the tablet came to be and also mentions the sun god and other gods like Thoth. And where did they get Pi out of it in the 2nd movie?
I think tablet of Ahkmemrah has a hallucinogenic compound and Larry is now high and thinks everything in the museum a living thing...
For me I actually love the Night at the museum films because they were a part of my childhood and I loved them since
Then Ben Stiller should ask Teddy Roosevelt if he really saw Bigfoot.
I personally think alot of the reason that this stuff doesn't make sense is just because the writers didn't put a whole bunch of thought into the lore of the series. It's easier for people to just theorize and have things stay unconfirmed. There are all kinds of plot holes and stuff in this series. Which makes me sad, because I, too, overanalyze the lore and stuff of movies and TV shows I love, but hey, there's nothing I can do about it. There's nothing any of us can do about it, really.
Here is something I don't understand. How would the tablet understand what to put what soul in? Like why wouldn't it make the the Teddy Roosevelt wax sculptor into a volcano, and the volcano model into Teddy? Also, how would it know to treat one picture as a way to go back in time, and another a fictional place?
"Phones wouldnt exist without Ben Stiller" (my emotions) 😐😑😮🙂☺😀🤣😂
The Night At The Museum Trilogy may have its reasons but regardless of what or how to me I feel myself not of this world myself when one has many lives before and after and how we feel that becomes the real deal is beyond what we hold most dear
Yes, I've been waiting for thissss😆
HELL YES ! I recently got into this fandom, and was sad that I came too late. But here you are making a vid about my fav thing right now ! THANK YOU!!
Yes, try "Idocracy", and "El Dorado"(from 2000, I still have questions about that movie.).
“Some hate it some love it some are in the middle”
So...like every other movie?
That last point you made about no living beings having statues that come to life is interesting to me, because in the third movie there technically IS a statue of Larry. Laar the Caveman was modelled after him and comes to life the same as everyone else, but seems to immediately recognise Larry as his father and has, whilst not the greatest intellect, far more social and mental awareness than the other cavemen we see in the series. Did the tablet create an entirely new soul for Laar, then? Or is it a cheap imitation of Larry’s?
Not just that but this video also explains those moments in the new movie where Joan of Arc has visions.
wait....THERE IS A THIRD MOVIE, IM COMIN NETFLIX
I think Joey invented the phone in the normal timeline but when he had a run in with the night guard, he shifted time to be faster than it was supposed to be
I always believes this
but I went with the statues of fictional characters revealing to Larry despite him not realising that these creatures did in fact exist and were apart of history such as cupids, half hawk people, giant Chinese snakes , winged lion bodies creatures with head of the kings of the ruler of Assyria and e.t c.
also they found out about current events cause of the realm their spirits reside.
also who hated this awesome series
he keeps saying that teddy has half of the real soul, but there aren't any other teddy roosevelts (spelled that wrong) in the museum and the tablet only effects the museum that its in.
I will never experience laughter the same ever again.
That was a little funny though. It got a giggle out of me.
BTW, love the channel! Keep those videos coming!
Loved ur crazy laughing at the end
Manuel Blumenstein See this isn't the theorizer this is actually his evil twin know as the theorizer 2. He was running the second channel until he got fed up with his mere 2nd place and lack of subscribers. So he trained lily the theorizer's cat to slowly drive the theorizer crazy and unstable. Then when the time was right he struck leaving him disabled. However the theorizer 2 could not bring himself to kill the original. So he placed him on a computer with a crappy animation software and a text to speech program. Now he runs the CP channel, forever crying in despair that someone would help him. But unable to say it because Lily now edits the CP videos before they are posted, and if she reads something she doesn't like she attacks
I don't know if I should be proud of it, but of my _many_ laughs sounds exactly like that one you had at the end.
_It was hilarious._
Love these videos
Awesome video. Not much else to say. I really enjoyed watching this video and just subscribed so I don't miss any future videos.
I always wondered whether or not the wax sculptures do in fact carry the souls of the people they represent.
If that's the case, then the Amelia Earhart sculpture would be able to tell people what really happened to her plane. lol
If I could posite... Have you considered Tsukumogami? Things that have been used and repaired for years gaining spirits/souls of their own due to the use and love they've gone through. Perhaps that is an explanation for the objects/sculptures/fictional characters that couldn't be reincarnated?
Theorizer you have real talent here, you turned comedy in to something really creepy. Good show, good show.
I've been waiting to this
I can help you on the theory why non existent artefacts were brought to life by the tablet too.
The thing is that we humans gave these pieces of artefact a soul with our made up thoughts on creating and sculpting each character until it seemingly has its own soul.
Notice how even the easter statue from the first move comes to life is probably easily explained that some children who visited the place created a story or the character upon it.
Like you said, these statues can remember things even without the tablet or them coming to life. I believe if at least a person think that artefact is alive, the tablet can alter and give the soul to the artefact itself.
What do you think? It could probably help you in your part 2 (if you are ever going to make one that is which i hope you will :3)
Love your channel btw ❤
Thank you so much for this, I waited for a video like this for ages!
OMG, that's why I recognised Jay Burechel in the Sorcerer's Apprentice. I first saw his cameo as Joey Motorola in this movie
.........I've been watching your videos for years. You are a comfort creator of mine. Your theories have given me something to think about and focus on through very hard parts of my life when I needed escape. So I say this with much love and respect; I'm gonna need you to NEVER laugh like that again.
0:45 “the Roman general dude” I’m dieing 🤣
when i was rewatching the 2nd movie, When Kamunrah was talking to Ivan the Terrible, Napoleon, and Al capone, when he said "You are all the most fear leaders of all of history" and I was like wait, did they forget to put Hitler?
Ahh finally after a long week I can finally watch my favorite UA-camr
At 2:09 their is actually a simple answer to this when you have knowledge of Egyptian Mythos.
According to ancient Egyptians the soul is separated into 5 parts.
1) Ba represents a person's personality.
2) Ib is the heart.
3)Ka is your life force.
4) Ren your whole identity also referenced as your secret name.
5) Sheut is your shadow. Also means statue.
Your confused as to why your shadow is part of your soul? The Egyptians believe that your shadow is a sign of the impact you made in this life. Much like a statue of a famous president.
It was also believe that if you know the right spell, you basically revive a person with their shadow and a statue.
THIS IS SERIOUSLY DANG CONFUSING!
ah theorizer, i love your videos, you make back what is lost in gametheory.
Moon god, only reanimates at night. What would happen if we put the tablet on the moon?
Are you talking shit about my boy Oscar the Grouch in my boy Darth Vader saying that they ain't real I guess me and Vader , Oscar going to have to break some legs
Oscar would've been a great member of Kahmunrah's army in the second film I wish we could've seen more of him
Nice theory. I love the movie.
Wait a moment! So what you're saying is that if there was a wax figure of a current real life person, let's say Lady Gaga, then that figure wouldn't come to life? I kinda feel like it definately would, but maybe it would split the soul like with the Einsteins.
I mean though, I think buzz aldrin is alive in real life
I can't get enough of the intro music
Damn, going all ham on a children's comedy movie! WHERES THE GUM GUM
Here's how i rank the night at the museum films best to worst on a scale of 1 to 100:
1) night at the museum (2006) 56/100
2) night at the museum 3 (2014) 48/100
3) night at the museum 2 (2009) 35/100
Wait, it has 2 sequels? I saw only the first back when I was only 2th grade. I should watch them
That was a very eerie laugh but the theory is well done. I think you're on to something here. Too bad they can't make another one, now that the great comedian Robin Williams has passed. But this theory has great points and good ones at that.
8:10 he actually spent some time in cambridge
So if he took the tablet to 'Madam Tussaud's' wax museum, not all of the figures would come alive since some of the people are still alive
Your videos constantly improve in quality.
#PhonesWouldntExistWithoutBennStiller
I actually really like NatM. Also, Rami Malek
Here's a thought: Think of the Tablet as the Akashic Records, if you've heard of those, the sort of spiritual/existential record keeping of all activity in the cosmos. Build an accurate image of a being and the tablet projects a personality upon that image dependant in accuracy upon how much that image resembles the being it is meant to represent. It's the same reason "Speaking the Name of a Being" in occult magic is thought to summon that being, and building an image of that being summons it moreso. The record keeping of the cosmos bundles like with like, so when you create an image, you sort of "Summon" all that resembles or is associated with that image, to that image. Night at the Museum is just... well, an extreme case, I suppose.
I like the lore in the movies. The comedy, not so much, though the third movie made me so sad, and I don't think I could watch it again :(
Can you do a boss baby? I have some pretty interesting ideas and theorys.
Lillyanna Natural *theories
N O
the way i always saw it was the tablet brings back corpses with their original soles but grants new soles to the wax figures but gives them the memories the real person had at the moment that statue is depicting so characters like Rex and Ahkmenra are able to remember everything up until their there deaths but wax sculptures like Teddy and Amelia are only able to remember till the moment that the sculpture is depicting. so when a sculpture comes to life for the first time its like they have been yanked out of that point in time and placed in the present day
Arcade Assassin Soul
Never put a xenomorph sculpture in a museum while Ahkmenrah is present.
notification squad!!!! i love ur vids
here.
Great videos from what I've seen so far; Subscribed!
In the 2nd movie, the tablet was in the Smithsonian, then back to the NYC museum. So do the figures & statues that came alive in the Smithsonian during the 2nd film become frozen forever or are they able to still move in the night despite the tablet is in another place?
How it works:
Magic
Out of curiosity I looked up Jedediah and found a historical match. Octavius also has a historical match.
The Roman general dude is Octavius
could this logic possibly also explain (somehow) the magic in the movie Indian in the Cupboard?
Random time
What's your fav franchise
🍟 = mc Donald
👧🏼= Wendy's
🍔 = Burger King
🍗 =chic fa le
⭐️ = Walmart
🍜 = subway
🍣 = any Chinese restaurant
🥗 = salad co
So the tablet created the belldam?
If the tablet puts new flesh on the mummified corpses why doesn’t the T. rex become an actual trex instead of being a bunch of moving bones
Jonathan G mind blown
maybe it's because the bones aren't real? I heard a while ago that when they make those skeletons the bones they use are often fake, which makes a lot of sense when you think about it.
The real bones aré in the attic of the musem bit if is the case Why we dont see them come to life in the musem
Because they're all separated in different boxes so they don't resemble something that should have life?
Yes your rigth
I LOVE THAT MOVIE