Thanks for calling my attention to the channel. I would have just saved the video and probably forgotten to look at the channel itself and it definitely IS one of the most interesting channels on UA-cam.
The amount of content on this channel is insane. Cant wait to cite it as one of my favorite youtube channels when speaking from a panel I use many of the scientists interviewed throughout this series in my novels
Yup I remember finding & bookmarking the Closer to Truth website at least 10-15 years ago...well before UA-cam's popularity. I remember it used a really clunky embedded video player.
What are your novels, can you give us a preview? When are they gonna be published? And, what is your actual author name so that we can keep an eye out?
@@weilunkang Of course. It's a series entitled Tactile Therapy: Volume One and Adjunct. There are two books already out. The story is an action adventure/ sci-fi that follows six individuals recovering from the asteroid that's going to swing by Earth in the year 2029. Its filled with science and philosophy. You can check it out on amazon or simply google the title www.amazon.com/Durell-Arrington/e/B0794C2MV8
I like the idea of universes going back eternally hence never a "beginning" to existence..each with their own different laws..perhaps different life forms..that would exclude god in a sense..but it wouldn't exclude eternal consciousness..or an afterlife... FASCINATING VIDEO! My favourite so far :)
I think it’s a bit tricky to conceptualize and then animate that which is the subject of debate.... I’m literally trying to picture the great mystery in my mind and cannot come up with a tangible model...
3 роки тому
I like the way Max Igan expresses the problem of knowledge. 'Everything is based on lies until we can see clearly beyond the physical shapes of our environment.' His argument is roughly that, because we concentrate on objects, instead of the space between objects, like protons existing in two places simultaneously, we will never know what kind of stuff we actually live in. I've had moments in my life when I know exactly, in detail, what is going to happen next. And it has done. Also moments of existing in two different places, like seeing myself from another dimension concurrently. I've questioned it, thinking my imagination is in over drive but then do I really know how my consciousness works? I personally believe that everything is conscious because it is all living. Life is just form, shapes. We live in an ocean of life but can only relate to a bucket full.
@@FelixBat In my small Research Center, I use a simple method to study force physics. It's the turbo-gyro-oscillation rule. Always works well, from zero to the infinite or unknown. 😊
I bet in 100 years we're going to look back on what we thought we understood happens in the first 10^-37th of a second 13.7 billion years ago and chuckle at the quaintness of our notions. But like the futurist I am, I'm confident today that we have no remote clue what happened then.
@@Tom_Quixote We might chuckle 100 years from now. Or a 1000 years. You think we "got it right now"? We can close the science shops because we figured it all out?
As much as I believe in the multiverse theory, Paul Davies's argument, that by invoking everything you explain nothing is extremely powerful. Multiverse theory must work on probing other realities to see if we can detect them from inside this universe. I believe that when we see an interference pattern in a double slit experiment, we might be seeing the influence of parallel histories affecting the motion of the one particle we can see, so maybe there is a way to peer into those other realities or finding other ways in which patterns affect us. In the end, not all explanations are exactly equivalent.
In another universe I discovered multiple universes are real and am lauded for it. I am astounded by my own greatness, I am not the nobody people say I am, well done me.
the vivid dreams are seemingly proof of possilble other realities or if someone is serving in tennis for set point and misses in another universe is made i have been out and about many times feeling people places and things being quite different just so hard to prove
I like Paul Davies and if I was a betting Man my money is on him. It really is just good old Common Sense actually as he didn’t even have to use big hard to understand words to get his Excellent point across. I mean you can’t explain infinite Universe’s when you still have so many unanswered questions about the one we live in. I just don’t see how you can disagree with a word he said. He is spot on with the Religion Analogy!!!!!
More seriously Dr Kuhn, here is my take: What would happen if we circle the earth with a rope , strong and large enough to exert a pulling force so as to derail the earth from its orbit,? Will fine-tuning constants still hold? Would life on earth still be possible?
There is no "you in other universes". If you are not aware of their thoughts, it's just "other people". If their life or universe differs in certain aspects, they are just different people. It might be fun to think that in some other universe you might be rich or handsome. But who came up with the stupid idea that it's "you" instead of just other creatures ?
I though about this a lot, it means one tree maybe different in a different universe but a tree won’t just burst into fire randomly in one just to be different. Hope that analogy makes sense. It think infinite causes turned out that are probable, I like this guy, also I believe this more than god Cool hot spring! Much easier to listen to this guy, I think cause it’s based on maths I can understand it I like how he categorised it into 4 types he went a bit further that I did, I like the classification of the types Also a great question, how large are we yeah
No troubles with customers, travelling to conferences around the world, get paid for speculating about the universe, giving interviews in hot springs... I definitely choose the wrong professional career.
I keep thinking about a parallel universe that differs only extremely little and even looks the same too. Would all these universes springing into existence and who are the same not spontaneously nest adjacent in a higher spatial dimension?. Then gradually going further you would meet more and more differences until the universe becomes unrecognizable and perhaps only very "far away" a new universe with life would pop up which again started to change. This idea is a little bit like walking in shadows of the Zelazny Amber serie of course. But I wonder too if the passage of time can't be considered as traveling through the multiverse.
@@donkique956 Amber is pure fantasy but there the parallel worlds seem to lay "next to each other" like pages in a multidimensional book.Zelazny is very inspiring.rpggeek.com/rpgsetting/19213/amber-multiverse
Do you actually understand Quantum Mechanics? The many worlds interpretation is based on an implicstion that falls right out of Quantum Mechanics, which is provable and testable. As for whether or not it solves anything, it resolves the issue of wave function collapse, as well as everything else quantum mechanics already solved and explained. If your hang-up is where the energy for those "extra" universes is coming from, I don't know about your understanding of the theory. I think that when you hear "when the wave function branches it creates a new universe" as it literally big banging another universe into existence or something. I'd say consult videos by Sean Carrol to better understand what is meant about wave functions branching a universe. I think the easiest way to think about it is that wave function branching is all inside the same multiverse, and the big bang created that multiverse. However as far as multiple big bangs leading to multiple different quantum miltiverses. Here thermodynamics is kind of awkward to try to apply, because thermodynamics and it's laws are based on observations *inside* of *our* universe as with all other universes. You have to make the claim that there is no possible universe where specifically the laws of thermodynamics do not apply which might be a stretch. And also make the claim that it applies even outside of the universe or under the conditions before a universe exists. That gets a bit awkward and presumptuous. But even aside from that, we know about virtual particles and how they can become real near the edge of a black hole (they spontaneously manifest in equal and opposite pairs and usually immediately cancel each other out for a net 0), and we know the unviverse is expanding. A consequence of the above is that when the universe has expanded to the point where virtual particles spontaneously manifest so far apart that they don't get a chance to immediately annihilate each-other (like what happens near the edge of black holes, one falls in and the other escapes) then you get something that looks like big bang conditions where suddenly a bunch of matter is manifesting out of seemingly nowhere. Where is that matter and energy coming from? The random vaccume fluctuations of quantum fields. That's what creates virtual particles. AKA you must consult Quantum Mechanics again. Basically a quantum field can never be at an absolute 0 state. It is weird though xD and it definitely has it's problems. But I don't think your takes on it are the best most well informed takes. If many worlds somehow violated thermodynamics in a way that was relevant, it wouldn't be taken seriously, and your assertion that energy flows from higher to lower is an appeal to thermodynamics.
Rinkamime Thanks for your response. It's the formation of matter that quantifies time and distance but can matter exist without the dilation of time and space? How much matter is required? Isn't it all the singularities and super massive gravitational wells that hold the universe together? It seems like a case of all or none. Atoms themselves are bound up packets of energy. 20 some of the most common elements, combined packets of energy, are functional parts, EACH ONE essential for life. (20 of them!) An equal amount (20 some) of other common elements are beneficial to life. The instruction for life isn't even a physical thing. It's a concatenation of a molecule (the ordering of elements) that is various unique written commands or programming that result(s) in different living organisms that fight entropy for a while, spawning new generations by command. How can you even believe or think there isn't a very wise intelligent powerful cause for everything that we see and consciously experience? It is the very definition of God to be all knowing, all powerful and the cause of everything there is (the God of gods). The goat herders 🐐 were able to understand that 😳💥🙄‼️😆🤣😂 so what is your problem? 🙄🙄🙄🙂😁 Logic and math required for the formation of matter and programming etc???❓❓❓That is the proof of God.💥‼️ 🤔 Everything requires energy... from God.
@@JungleJargon It's not all singularities and supermassive black holes that hold the universe together, it's not quite so simple unfortunately xD Like, Baryonic matter (what makes up us, life, stars and planets and black holes) doesn't account for all the mass and energy in the universe that we know is out there. In fact it's in the minority. See, Dark Matter. As for the intelligent design thing. I can respect it, it's just that I mire subscribe to the theory of evolution where life happened as a result of complex chemical and envirornmental phenomena and then certain types of life were selected for or against by the envirornment. With this paradigm, given that we know the vast majority of species that have ever lived went extinct before humans even existed, it's awkward to think that an intelligent being deliverately made that happen, literally designed life, only for the vast majority of it to die out and go extinct due to no fault of humanity but instead to selection pressure from the envirornment. It's just really awkward to reconcile those things so I wouldn't write subscribe to the intelligent design argument but I won't knock you for it because it does have a simple understanding to it. That said I don't intend to prove that there isn't a God or Necessary Being or such. It's just that it's awkward to reconcile that with observations we make about the world unless you come to some very radical conclusions about the nature of that being. But regardless, it's interesting stuff, and glad this channel brings people like us together to think about these things! Needless to say I'm not quite a part of the Theology camp and am more of a guest but I've learned a thing or 2 from this channel and it's community.
It's becoming increasingly believable that the universe itself is conscious and brings about reality as it desires under the cloak of 'chance and probability'. This is what Problacists believe (see Problacism.com).
Paul Davies is rejecting the multiverse, but does he have any alternative explanation to the apparent finetuning of the supposed one and only universe?
The earth was not fine tuned to Accommodate people and everything around us. Everyone and Everything evolved over time from the change in our weather and placement in the solar system.
I wonder if it is the multiverse that we exist within? I sense layer upon layer of venn diagram style universes co-creating to form matter that is sufficiently dense to experience physicality. A body of water consists of many different yet interdependent bonds.
Imagination of multiple(infinite nos) parallel or non-parallel verse is illogically absurd of absolute order! First if one subscribes to big bang one has to start with infinite nos physically indeterminate states of singularities(if they were merged then only one) then to expand (in fact resulting overcrowded spacetime with cosmic eggs with no where to expand if there were infinite no of singularities, and effectively may cause early collapse and merging into a single expanding entity. this may explain the early "inflation" if there was bigbang at all) them (in indeterminate states because no one knew anything about the status outside the universe,) to infinite no of indeterminate end/horizon of infinite nos of spaces (if they are not merged into a single universal space time). One shall end up with (infinity minus 1) indeterminate verses( in theory) while one mind is hanging between two infinite singularities - the singularity of the beginning and singularity of the end,/horizon...(converging realities)! One mind can imagine anything.... but one imagination has yet to explain how and why from singularly no space(absolutely nothing) was becoming a universal space for universal events to have occured or going to occur and one can't explain how and what made one mind that can imagine both... that is without certainty end...and that is with certainty end ... and that leads us to the fact or the truth.... that ....with all commendable achievements modern science ... it is still at the stage of a reality under construction or works in progress... yet to come to TRUTH end ....it can be obsolete by tomorrow or near future ... today human flies with plane but can be yesterday to tomorrow generations with GM Engineering wings ... similar thing can happen to scientific theories...? In alQuranic cosmological perspective the today cosmological discourses and observations are still not further then the lowest heaven space...far far below from the seventh heaven at the horizon of human universe....and yet that isn't the end alQuranic cosmological discourse! AlQuran is the Truth ...and it challenges anyone to prove otherwise! (I only offer alQuranic believer perspective...I hope no harm is done. And the Podcast Author doesn't mind.)
What would multiple universes mean ? - If You knew the principle of universes, You would Not ask such question, You're blinded by the 'macro-univers' as You looks at from within, and dont have a clue of what You see, this is a very narrow understanding of what a universe is. But your physical body consists of a series of universes, so think about this, when you're in the middle of rush-hour. And try if You can see the Living, behind the Beings.
Interesting subject, but... - Then another universe exists in which every electron has moved and will move exactly like in this universe for a zillion years. Except for one of the electrons, which deviated a little bit for a micro-second. - Then another universe exists in which every life form has behaved and will behave exactly like in this universe for a zillion years. Except for me now, farting in this universe. And all combinations of minor deviations of every behavior of every object then exist as a specific universe.... which makes the probability for anything = 1 Nah, don't think so. Infinity rule in mathematics: ∞ + 1 = ∞ Subtract infinity (∞) from both sides of the equation, and you get... 1 = 0 Nah, don't think so, no real physical infinities in any form (space volmues, number of universes/objects, number of events) even if something "always" has existed. Imo, then number of changes and events go towards infinity, but never reaches it, it can not be reached.
There may not be an infinitely many, but there could be an indefinite / endlessly growing number. It could double every Planck second, without ending, and never violate your distaste for physical infinities. It does seem like a lot of hassle though, just to make some people's math work out. "All the smart people are wrong" seems more likely to me - at least that possibility has infinite (rimshot) precedent.
@@bozo5632 "There may not be an infinitely many, but there could be an indefinite / endlessly growing number. It could double every Planck second, without ending, and never violate your distaste for physical infinities." Could be, but as we seem to agree, it is not and never physical infinity. The physicist George Ellis, for example, explains this very well in several UA-cam videos.
I don't get at 23:00 with Paul Davies - where does God come in? God has nothing to do with a Multi-verse We are one life form - there are other life forms We live in this one earth - yep there are other earths We have our sun - yep quite a lot of other suns We have our Galaxy - quite a lot of other galaxies Well the Universe is just one more step further We can't test for them now does not mean we should not think of them
@@cosmikrelic4815 But a multiverse is just a bigger idea than a galaxy We are one life form - but we know there are other life forms One earth, but we are starting to find earths similar to ours Our sun, but there are billions of suns out there Our galaxy, again billions of galaxies It is just expanding our view Why is the universe so fine-tuned for life? It is because it is just one of many - some are dead - some have different life forms But God is just a fantasy - some magic being with incredible powers made all this? How did he pop up? Is he the only one? Are there other Gods with incredible powers? We have yet to encounter even one! We can start saying Superman, wonder woman exist as well But we don't because unlike God - they are not Sugar Daddies - someone who will nicely keep us in cozy comfort for eternity if we just beg & grovel to the "right" God!
@@cosmikrelic4815 The idea is that we are not unique - that is crazy to think that way. If life can be seeded here, it can be seeded in other planets as well - the conditions have to be just right that's all To me it is crazy to think we are the only planet on which life came to be & the rest of the galaxy is all dead planets Just doesn't make any sense
Robert, you didn’t speak about the universe that makes all other universes unable to be, unable to exist. Surely one of the mathematical outcomes of the multiverse theory is such a universe? Which universe do you think that might be?
Please! Tegmark needs to take a vacation and eat some magic mushrooms. Then he might develop a theory that makes sense. Multiple universes are an oxymoron.
@@1099670 well it wouldn't be the first time I've been wrong, but I'm very suspicious of cosmologists making up new theories to support an older "discovery". To use multiverses to explain an expanding, accelerating universe, makes me think of "how many angels can dance on the head of a pin" justifications. Of course realistically these guys need funding and grants and they can't just sit around and go well let's just wait for the science to give us the answer let's just start making up stuff and write in papers. So that's suspicious to me. I'm glad somebody's out there thinking about it, and knows the math and physics, but I'm not sure we're really ready to come up with a definitive answer that justifies multiple universes.
The word "universe" was coined to include "all there is" but what if that is separated into bubbles of inflating space with infinite distances between them so that after branching off they never again interact? The only alternative is that our universe is a finite are with an outside edge suspended in -- what? Nothingness?
@@belablasco6681 this could go back and forth for quite a while, but the truth is I don't really understand the nature of the universe and all that exists. Although, I do not believe that the only alternatives are bubble universes or a finite universe hanging like snow globe in nothingness.
@@rafeller9057 The most commonly accepted scenario among cosmologists today is of an eternal inflation continually producing Big Bangs separated by infinities of space resulting in an ever-increasing number of bubble universes, and this may have been happening forever.
Yeah it means we're all going to jump into a big Jacuzzi hot tub together haha . Below the surface of the water there's a another universe and dimension and it's inflating. 🤪
If space goes on ad infinitum out from us, it too must go on ad infinitum within us. Dimensions so big, and so small, that we cannot conceive of them, in our universe. But likewise, any conscious matter on those scales would be unable to conceive or detect our own finite area of space we occupy. Trippy. We could be just one of a near infinite number of universes tucked within one another like Russian dolls 🪆
Isn't the "universe" theory (vs multiverse) less reasonable? Comparable to MONO-theism? I don't buy fine tuning necessarily. Maybe it'd take longer for dark energy's effects to make life hospitable (or less long). Maybe a different generation of fundamental particles would constitute stable matter. Perhaps there are many different configurations for different types of matter and life to happen.
The way I think of Parallel Universes is that they would all be different - in some universes there is life, like ours, other universes are dead universes. Life in other universes might be totally different - maybe silicon based, the laws would be totally different - we would not be able to exist in those universes But I bet there is no universe where God is a Sugar Daddy catering to the pleasures of the flesh of billions of old dead people just sitting about/snoring away/chatting/sitting/floating about staring at each other Every time I ask a theist - one does one DO in Heaven? They run away Do they think of their loved ones down on earth? They might be suffering/starving/homeless/crying/jobless/abused/beaten/tortured? Does being in Heaven mean not caring anymore? No one asks such questions because that would make religious leaders uncomfortable The media, the Philosophers & the educated complicit and keeping the Ponzi-scheme of Heaven going
Indeed, "heaven" would be hell. We live to explain and to solve problems. A non-problematic environment would be a hell of monotony. Monotony would extinguish the human mind.
@@patmoran5339 Heaven IS here -basically these people want an easy lazy life - nothing to do, no worries all the while shamelessly sponging off a Sugar Daddy God Well, that is the life of a Dog! It's master feeds, protects, shelters and cares for it - zero work or responsibilities or worries - Heaven! Fools Chasing after Fools Gold get what they deserve
@@ramaraksha01 I think that might be true for a tiny, tiny minority of people. I believe that the overwhelming majority are not like that at all. Most of the people who are "fools" could be easily convinced that there is a better way given the right knowledge with good presentation of the facts that we live in the most peaceful and prosperous time in the history of human existence and that there are no upper limits on the value of human ideas.
@@patmoran5339 Not one asks - What exactly do we DO in Heaven? NOT ONE! We are going to spend eternity there - what do we do there? Chat about? All the talk is about how we will meet our loved ones and then what? What do we do on a daily basis? Religions don't like that question because they have no answers The question is more difficult than it looks If they say we work, ok what kind of work? What work does the All-Might God is engaged in? Running factories making widgets that get exported to the universe next door? So that's out and we end up with billions of lazy bums sitting about/snoring away for eternity! And this is the Grand Plan of God? Clearly anyone with an ounce of intelligence can see that this is just a fantasy being peddled by religions And the frightening thing is the silence - the media, the educated NOT asking question knowing that religious people don't like such questions to be asked And so they are complicit in keeping this ponzi-scheme going And such ponzi-schemes have killed innocent people - like that young teacher beheaded in France The hands of the educated, media, the philosopher and the moral are stained with the blood of innocents
@@ramaraksha01 You might want to think about this too. The group of people who recoil from the idea of prolonging the average life-span to say, maybe 150 years or more through the advances in medical science, is rejected by these same people. In other words, they are OK with immortality as long as it is their god who provides it.
So ,in a infinite amount of universes, with a infinite amount of possibilities, is a possibility that this universe was created by a been, all powerful outside our universe, in other words a been from other universe created our universe, he or she or any gender you can choose can control everything from this universe, again is possible in a infinite amount of possibilities, make sense right.??
@@randysteele6741 If there are an infinite number of universes, then there is a pretty good chance that one of them has something akin to magic. The point being that both theories are ridiculous and unproven and in all likelihood will never be observed.
How can there be an infinite number of anything? If there are numbers of anything then there can't be infinite numbers. If anything can exist, it can be counted.
Exactly, and this simple truth is so obvious and fundamental, it is literally shocking how so many otherwise intelligent people just don't seem to get it. In reality, there can only be one infinity, and that single infinity must be all inclusive and contain everything in existence. In other words, if you postulate multiple universes, then how is the singular infinity affected? It isn't!
It's the formation of matter that quantifies time and distance but can matter exist without the dilation of time and space? How much matter is required? Isn't it all the singularities and super massive gravitational wells that hold the universe together? It seems like a case of all or none. Atoms themselves are bound up packets of energy. 20 some of the most common elements, combined packets of energy, are functional parts, EACH ONE essential for life. (20 of them!) An equal amount (20 some) of other common elements are beneficial to life. The instruction for life isn't even a physical thing. It's a concatenation of a molecule (the ordering of elements) that is various unique written commands or programming that result(s) in different living organisms that fight entropy for a while, spawning new generations by command. How can you even believe or think there isn't a very wise intelligent powerful cause for everything that we see and consciously experience? It is the very definition of God to be all knowing, all powerful and the cause of everything there is (the God of gods). The goat herders 🐐 were able to understand that 😳💥🙄‼️😆🤣😂 so what is your problem? 🙄🙄🙄🙂😁 Logic and math required for the formation of matter and programming etc???❓❓❓That is the proof of God.💥‼️ 🤔
Don't want to sound like a troll, but I can't help ask this question and don't think of me as a religious nut. Have anybody heard of Occam's Razor, where basically the simplest or simpler answer is likely to be the right one. Believing in the Big Bang, as atheists do, is believing in a metaphysical event. So should then another metaphysical explanation not also be considered: People are quite willing to believe in more difficult things than God. God is no less metaphysical than the Big Bang, which is the ultimate trick that a Magician could produce, all matter from nothing (it sounds God-like). That's a tough thing to believe and yet we are asked to believe it. God is also metaphysical, that strikes me as a simpler and maybe even the simplest answer. Then why is it so unacceptable and people run a hundred miles away from it? *What makes the idea of God so unacceptable?* .
This is one of the most interesting channels on UA-cam in my opinion.
Yes 👌👽
Thanks for calling my attention to the channel. I would have just saved the video and probably forgotten to look at the channel itself and it definitely IS one of the most interesting channels on UA-cam.
Icelandic hot spring is definitely where I’d start going to do all my interviews!
Where did they put their camera and microphone?
@@carolinedelisle589 trade secret!
Or the springs in Japan in the fall.
The amount of content on this channel is insane. Cant wait to cite it as one of my favorite youtube channels when speaking from a panel
I use many of the scientists interviewed throughout this series in my novels
True. This man has been digging deep for some time. Philosophy, cosmology, theology, metaphysics. He's a depth whisperer.
Yup I remember finding & bookmarking the Closer to Truth website at least 10-15 years ago...well before UA-cam's popularity. I remember it used a really clunky embedded video player.
What are your novels, can you give us a preview? When are they gonna be published? And, what is your actual author name so that we can keep an eye out?
@@weilunkang Of course. It's a series entitled Tactile Therapy: Volume One and Adjunct. There are two books already out. The story is an action adventure/ sci-fi that follows six individuals recovering from the asteroid that's going to swing by Earth in the year 2029. Its filled with science and philosophy. You can check it out on amazon or simply google the title
www.amazon.com/Durell-Arrington/e/B0794C2MV8
@@TactileTherapy Cool, thanks !
man one day i wish i can talk about the multiverse while swimming too. how cool are these guys!
There is only one universe, the physical universe. But, within the Cosmos there is the physical Universe and the invisible spirit world together.
What!?
I like the idea of universes going back eternally hence never a "beginning" to existence..each with their own different laws..perhaps different life forms..that would exclude god in a sense..but it wouldn't exclude eternal consciousness..or an afterlife...
FASCINATING VIDEO! My favourite so far :)
They should stop showing animations of galaxies when they are talking about universes - make an animation - the channel deserves it!
I think it’s a bit tricky to conceptualize and then animate that which is the subject of debate.... I’m literally trying to picture the great mystery in my mind and cannot come up with a tangible model...
I like the way Max Igan expresses the problem of knowledge. 'Everything is based on lies until we can see clearly beyond the physical shapes of our environment.' His argument is roughly that, because we concentrate on objects, instead of the space between objects, like protons existing in two places simultaneously, we will never know what kind of stuff we actually live in.
I've had moments in my life when I know exactly, in detail, what is going to happen next. And it has done. Also moments of existing in two different places, like seeing myself from another dimension concurrently. I've questioned it, thinking my imagination is in over drive but then do I really know how my consciousness works?
I personally believe that everything is conscious because it is all living. Life is just form, shapes. We live in an ocean of life but can only relate to a bucket full.
Some start with zero or nothing. Others are surrounded by everything, infinite, unimaginable.
@@FelixBat In my small Research Center, I use a simple method to study force physics. It's the turbo-gyro-oscillation rule. Always works well, from zero to the infinite or unknown. 😊
Wow. Love the new production, music great audio on this one.
"Cosmology" - the study of how long it takes before you need drugs.
This is the first time I’ve seen so many shirtless physicists at once😄
Nude Physics: When Quantum Physics Interweave with Cosmological Physics
No way they were in the water doing the interview 😂
Appealing to infinite possibilities (universes) is an appeal to a physical god without accounting for where the power or energy is coming from.
if these universes are 'separated by time and space' they may be consecutive rather than concurrent as per roger penrose.
Which explains why we aren't experiencing them all at once. I think you're on to something.
I have the biggest crush on Max and it has lasted since I first discovered him many years ago! Lol
The physical and natural.. you are here today and tomorrow you will be in another universe... I believe that is how things go
Nope you'll still be in this one just many different carbon atoms spaced out in between each other.
@@TheConqueror009 damn man you're like the Grinch who stole multiverses 😉
I bet in 100 years we're going to look back on what we thought we understood happens in the first 10^-37th of a second 13.7 billion years ago and chuckle at the quaintness of our notions.
But like the futurist I am, I'm confident today that we have no remote clue what happened then.
What makes you think we'll progress? We don't chuckle today at what Einstein said 100 years ago.
@@Tom_Quixote We might chuckle 100 years from now. Or a 1000 years. You think we "got it right now"? We can close the science shops because we figured it all out?
Multiple universes could mean cosmic inflation exists outside this universe as eternal inflation, and perhaps dark energy as well.
My thought exactly.
I’m just imagining the cameraman in the hot spring with them 😂
As much as I believe in the multiverse theory, Paul Davies's argument, that by invoking everything you explain nothing is extremely powerful. Multiverse theory must work on probing other realities to see if we can detect them from inside this universe. I believe that when we see an interference pattern in a double slit experiment, we might be seeing the influence of parallel histories affecting the motion of the one particle we can see, so maybe there is a way to peer into those other realities or finding other ways in which patterns affect us. In the end, not all explanations are exactly equivalent.
In another universe I discovered multiple universes are real and am lauded for it. I am astounded by my own greatness, I am not the nobody people say I am, well done me.
You are very special, just like everybody else.
the vivid dreams are seemingly proof of possilble other realities
or if someone is serving in tennis for set point and misses in another universe is made i have been out and about many times feeling people places and things being quite different just so hard to prove
It's weird to think there could be another version of me watching another version of this video at the same time
In that universe they're in steamy mud pits.
Maybe on an ad-free UA-cam ? 😀
You did not mention Alex Vilenkin's (Tufts) original ideas of eternal inflation.
The idea that there are multiple universes is dividing us.
Davies has a very good point!
In a multiverse I'm all the things I'm not in this one.
Including dead?
In and out, 20 minutes adventure
I was wondering why is it that most of your videos are 26;46 long Bob?
I think they maybe made for TV?
"What Would Multiple Universes Mean" is kind of basic question now, but "What Would Multiple multiverses Mean" is more intriguing.
6:00 - Robert Lawrence 𝐒 𝐖 𝐈 𝐌 𝐌
7:15 - What is Robert doing to Bob Ross' beard?? :D
There is an r rated version of this very talk out there.
I like that one 'shadows of infinity'.
From learning how to stand upright and pick bananas with a stick 1 million years ago to this. Not bad homo sapiens.
I'd bet a lot of money that Andre Linde and his wife have the highest combined IQ of any married couple in the world.
Multiple universes?? Hopefully my other half is super duper rich 🤑
I like Paul Davies and if I was a betting Man my money is on him. It really is just good old Common Sense actually as he didn’t even have to use big hard to understand words to get his Excellent point across. I mean you can’t explain infinite Universe’s when you still have so many unanswered questions about the one we live in. I just don’t see how you can disagree with a word he said. He is spot on with the Religion Analogy!!!!!
Great episode, is there a making of?
In which dimension(s) are the multiple universes separated?
wonderful
I believe there is likely life on other planets. I have no problem considering there may be universes or dimensions beyond what we can see and sense.
It's Marty McFly from 2050.
What would multiple universes mean? They would mean that you're very likely consuming an illegal substance.
Not illegal everywhere...
@@TheProdigalMeowMeowMeowReturns
At least, not ilegal in every Universe.
Interesting, have they figured out what kind of monkey evolved in other places?
More seriously Dr Kuhn, here is my take: What would happen if we circle the earth with a rope , strong and large enough to exert a pulling force so as to derail the earth from its orbit,? Will fine-tuning constants still hold? Would life on earth still be possible?
Most definitely, yes. Or, perhaps, no way.
You call this being more serious?
I agree with the last scientist
There is no "you in other universes". If you are not aware of their thoughts, it's just "other people". If their life or universe differs in certain aspects, they are just different people. It might be fun to think that in some other universe you might be rich or handsome. But who came up with the stupid idea that it's "you" instead of just other creatures ?
Question: Is Eternal Inflation based on Quantum Theory or Relativity, or does it have elements of both?
According to Lewis Goffe not at all
19:35 PowerBook G4? When was this interview recorded?
Why's that? 15:58? That looking at the quantum, you can see far away?
Bit of a weird setting for a science talk lol
I though about this a lot, it means one tree maybe different in a different universe but a tree won’t just burst into fire randomly in one just to be different. Hope that analogy makes sense. It think infinite causes turned out that are probable, I like this guy, also I believe this more than god
Cool hot spring!
Much easier to listen to this guy, I think cause it’s based on maths I can understand it
I like how he categorised it into 4 types he went a bit further that I did, I like the classification of the types
Also a great question, how large are we yeah
No troubles with customers, travelling to conferences around the world, get paid for speculating about the universe, giving interviews in hot springs... I definitely choose the wrong professional career.
I keep thinking about a parallel universe that differs only extremely little and even looks the same too. Would all these universes springing into existence and who are the same not spontaneously nest adjacent in a higher spatial dimension?. Then gradually going further you would meet more and more differences until the universe becomes unrecognizable and perhaps only very "far away" a new universe with life would pop up which again started to change. This idea is a little bit like walking in shadows of the Zelazny Amber serie of course. But I wonder too if the passage of time can't be considered as traveling through the multiverse.
What!?
@@donkique956 Amber is pure fantasy but there the parallel worlds seem to lay "next to each other" like pages in a multidimensional book.Zelazny is very inspiring.rpggeek.com/rpgsetting/19213/amber-multiverse
So have the Buddhists got it right with their reincarnation theory ?
It's also what christianity refers to with the idea of eternal life is the idea of Infinite iterations of consciousness, I think.
First time i’ve seen RLK tip his hand. When he adds “about a million times in a row”. Yup. Something weird going on.
Why is Max's head yellow in the hot springs?
You can't charge your cell phone from an equal or lesser amount of energy... energy always comes from a greater source.
Do you actually understand Quantum Mechanics? The many worlds interpretation is based on an implicstion that falls right out of Quantum Mechanics, which is provable and testable.
As for whether or not it solves anything, it resolves the issue of wave function collapse, as well as everything else quantum mechanics already solved and explained.
If your hang-up is where the energy for those "extra" universes is coming from, I don't know about your understanding of the theory. I think that when you hear "when the wave function branches it creates a new universe" as it literally big banging another universe into existence or something. I'd say consult videos by Sean Carrol to better understand what is meant about wave functions branching a universe. I think the easiest way to think about it is that wave function branching is all inside the same multiverse, and the big bang created that multiverse.
However as far as multiple big bangs leading to multiple different quantum miltiverses. Here thermodynamics is kind of awkward to try to apply, because thermodynamics and it's laws are based on observations *inside* of *our* universe as with all other universes. You have to make the claim that there is no possible universe where specifically the laws of thermodynamics do not apply which might be a stretch. And also make the claim that it applies even outside of the universe or under the conditions before a universe exists. That gets a bit awkward and presumptuous.
But even aside from that, we know about virtual particles and how they can become real near the edge of a black hole (they spontaneously manifest in equal and opposite pairs and usually immediately cancel each other out for a net 0), and we know the unviverse is expanding. A consequence of the above is that when the universe has expanded to the point where virtual particles spontaneously manifest so far apart that they don't get a chance to immediately annihilate each-other (like what happens near the edge of black holes, one falls in and the other escapes) then you get something that looks like big bang conditions where suddenly a bunch of matter is manifesting out of seemingly nowhere.
Where is that matter and energy coming from? The random vaccume fluctuations of quantum fields. That's what creates virtual particles. AKA you must consult Quantum Mechanics again. Basically a quantum field can never be at an absolute 0 state.
It is weird though xD and it definitely has it's problems. But I don't think your takes on it are the best most well informed takes. If many worlds somehow violated thermodynamics in a way that was relevant, it wouldn't be taken seriously, and your assertion that energy flows from higher to lower is an appeal to thermodynamics.
Rinkamime Thanks for your response. It's the formation of matter that quantifies time and distance but can matter exist without the dilation of time and space? How much matter is required? Isn't it all the singularities and super massive gravitational wells that hold the universe together? It seems like a case of all or none. Atoms themselves are bound up packets of energy. 20 some of the most common elements, combined packets of energy, are functional parts, EACH ONE essential for life. (20 of them!) An equal amount (20 some) of other common elements are beneficial to life. The instruction for life isn't even a physical thing. It's a concatenation of a molecule (the ordering of elements) that is various unique written commands or programming that result(s) in different living organisms that fight entropy for a while, spawning new generations by command. How can you even believe or think there isn't a very wise intelligent powerful cause for everything that we see and consciously experience? It is the very definition of God to be all knowing, all powerful and the cause of everything there is (the God of gods). The goat herders 🐐 were able to understand that 😳💥🙄‼️😆🤣😂 so what is your problem? 🙄🙄🙄🙂😁 Logic and math required for the formation of matter and programming etc???❓❓❓That is the proof of God.💥‼️ 🤔 Everything requires energy... from God.
@@JungleJargon It's not all singularities and supermassive black holes that hold the universe together, it's not quite so simple unfortunately xD Like, Baryonic matter (what makes up us, life, stars and planets and black holes) doesn't account for all the mass and energy in the universe that we know is out there. In fact it's in the minority. See, Dark Matter.
As for the intelligent design thing. I can respect it, it's just that I mire subscribe to the theory of evolution where life happened as a result of complex chemical and envirornmental phenomena and then certain types of life were selected for or against by the envirornment. With this paradigm, given that we know the vast majority of species that have ever lived went extinct before humans even existed, it's awkward to think that an intelligent being deliverately made that happen, literally designed life, only for the vast majority of it to die out and go extinct due to no fault of humanity but instead to selection pressure from the envirornment.
It's just really awkward to reconcile those things so I wouldn't write subscribe to the intelligent design argument but I won't knock you for it because it does have a simple understanding to it.
That said I don't intend to prove that there isn't a God or Necessary Being or such. It's just that it's awkward to reconcile that with observations we make about the world unless you come to some very radical conclusions about the nature of that being.
But regardless, it's interesting stuff, and glad this channel brings people like us together to think about these things! Needless to say I'm not quite a part of the Theology camp and am more of a guest but I've learned a thing or 2 from this channel and it's community.
@@occultninja4 Evolution is silly. Dark matter assumes too many things since too little is known.
There may or may not be Multi-verses, but how can space not be infinite?
The space that holds our universe is indeed infinite.
It's becoming increasingly believable that the universe itself is conscious and brings about reality as it desires under the cloak of 'chance and probability'. This is what Problacists believe (see Problacism.com).
If our small bodies can be conscious, why can’t something vast like the universe be conscious? I could see it.
@@anthony7960 - yes - even the simplest rock contains GigaJoules of energy and bends spacetime but nobody has a clue how it does it!
Could many worlds exist in different dimensions of space?
Paul Davies is rejecting the multiverse, but does he have any alternative explanation to the apparent finetuning of the supposed one and only universe?
The earth was not fine tuned to Accommodate people and everything around us. Everyone and Everything evolved over time from the change in our weather and placement in the solar system.
Means we going to love and no to hurts
I wonder if it is the multiverse that we exist within?
I sense layer upon layer of venn diagram style universes co-creating to form matter that is sufficiently dense to experience physicality.
A body of water consists of many different yet interdependent bonds.
Imagination of multiple(infinite nos) parallel or non-parallel verse is illogically absurd of absolute order!
First if one subscribes to big bang one has to start with infinite nos physically indeterminate states of singularities(if they were merged then only one) then to expand (in fact resulting overcrowded spacetime with cosmic eggs with no where to expand if there were infinite no of singularities, and effectively may cause early collapse and merging into a single expanding entity. this may explain the early "inflation" if there was bigbang at all) them (in indeterminate states because no one knew anything about the status outside the universe,) to infinite no of indeterminate end/horizon of infinite nos of spaces (if they are not merged into a single universal space time). One shall end up with (infinity minus 1) indeterminate verses( in theory) while one mind is hanging between two infinite singularities - the singularity of the beginning and singularity of the end,/horizon...(converging realities)!
One mind can imagine anything.... but one imagination has yet to explain how and why from singularly no space(absolutely nothing) was becoming a universal space for universal events to have occured or going to occur
and one can't explain how and what made one mind that can imagine both... that is without certainty end...and that is with certainty end ...
and that leads us to the fact or the truth.... that ....with all commendable achievements modern science ... it is still at the stage of a reality under construction or works in progress... yet to come to TRUTH end ....it can be obsolete by tomorrow or near future ... today human flies with plane but can be yesterday to tomorrow generations with GM Engineering wings ... similar thing can happen to scientific theories...?
In alQuranic cosmological perspective the today cosmological discourses and observations are still not further then the lowest heaven space...far far below from the seventh heaven at the horizon of human universe....and yet that isn't the end alQuranic cosmological discourse!
AlQuran is the Truth ...and it challenges anyone to prove otherwise!
(I only offer alQuranic believer perspective...I hope no harm is done. And the Podcast Author doesn't mind.)
It's called Scale.
What would multiple universes mean ? -
If You knew the principle of universes, You would Not ask such question,
You're blinded by the 'macro-univers' as You looks at from within, and dont have a clue of what You see, this is a very narrow understanding of what a universe is.
But your physical body consists of a series of universes, so think about this, when you're in the middle of rush-hour.
And try if You can see the Living, behind the Beings.
Interesting subject, but...
- Then another universe exists in which every electron has moved and will move exactly like in this universe for a zillion years. Except for one of the electrons, which deviated a little bit for a micro-second.
- Then another universe exists in which every life form has behaved and will behave exactly like in this universe for a zillion years. Except for me now, farting in this universe.
And all combinations of minor deviations of every behavior of every object then exist as a specific universe.... which makes the probability for anything = 1
Nah, don't think so.
Infinity rule in mathematics: ∞ + 1 = ∞
Subtract infinity (∞) from both sides of the equation, and you get... 1 = 0
Nah, don't think so, no real physical infinities in any form (space volmues, number of universes/objects, number of events) even if something "always" has existed. Imo, then number of changes and events go towards infinity, but never reaches it, it can not be reached.
There may not be an infinitely many, but there could be an indefinite / endlessly growing number. It could double every Planck second, without ending, and never violate your distaste for physical infinities.
It does seem like a lot of hassle though, just to make some people's math work out. "All the smart people are wrong" seems more likely to me - at least that possibility has infinite (rimshot) precedent.
@@bozo5632 "There may not be an infinitely many, but there could be an indefinite / endlessly growing number. It could double every Planck second, without ending, and never violate your distaste for physical infinities."
Could be, but as we seem to agree, it is not and never physical infinity. The physicist George Ellis, for example, explains this very well in several UA-cam videos.
It's proven that this guys can swim 😅
Will they ever discover multiverses ? Is my big question!!
I don't get at 23:00 with Paul Davies - where does God come in? God has nothing to do with a Multi-verse
We are one life form - there are other life forms
We live in this one earth - yep there are other earths
We have our sun - yep quite a lot of other suns
We have our Galaxy - quite a lot of other galaxies
Well the Universe is just one more step further
We can't test for them now does not mean we should not think of them
He is merely saying that if multiverses can't be seen then it is no better theory than god. They are both outside.
@@cosmikrelic4815 But a multiverse is just a bigger idea than a galaxy
We are one life form - but we know there are other life forms
One earth, but we are starting to find earths similar to ours
Our sun, but there are billions of suns out there
Our galaxy, again billions of galaxies
It is just expanding our view
Why is the universe so fine-tuned for life?
It is because it is just one of many - some are dead - some have different life forms
But God is just a fantasy - some magic being with incredible powers made all this? How did he pop up? Is he the only one?
Are there other Gods with incredible powers?
We have yet to encounter even one!
We can start saying Superman, wonder woman exist as well
But we don't because unlike God - they are not Sugar Daddies - someone who will nicely keep us in cozy comfort for eternity if we just beg & grovel to the "right" God!
@@ramaraksha01 actually we don't know if there are other life forms.
@@cosmikrelic4815 The idea is that we are not unique - that is crazy to think that way. If life can be seeded here, it can be seeded in other planets as well - the conditions have to be just right that's all
To me it is crazy to think we are the only planet on which life came to be & the rest of the galaxy is all dead planets
Just doesn't make any sense
@@ramaraksha01 I agree that it is likely but you said "we know" and we don't.
Robert, you didn’t speak about the universe that makes all other universes unable to be, unable to exist. Surely one of the mathematical outcomes of the multiverse theory is such a universe? Which universe do you think that might be?
Ours.
Nonsense.
@@ferdinandkraft857 which one Ferdinand?
Alan Guth will honor the Nobel Prize and not be honored by such prize.
The multiverse theory seems reasonable.
Would a multiverse have something to do with start of time as past, present and future?
Only in universe where exists definite arrow of time possible to think about time. Other universe not so luck.
Please! Tegmark needs to take a vacation and eat some magic mushrooms. Then he might develop a theory that makes sense. Multiple universes are an oxymoron.
Why?
@@1099670 well it wouldn't be the first time I've been wrong, but I'm very suspicious of cosmologists making up new theories to support an older "discovery". To use multiverses to explain an expanding, accelerating universe, makes me think of "how many angels can dance on the head of a pin" justifications. Of course realistically these guys need funding and grants and they can't just sit around and go well let's just wait for the science to give us the answer let's just start making up stuff and write in papers. So that's suspicious to me. I'm glad somebody's out there thinking about it, and knows the math and physics, but I'm not sure we're really ready to come up with a definitive answer that justifies multiple universes.
The word "universe" was coined to include "all there is" but what if that is separated into bubbles of inflating space with infinite distances between them so that after branching off they never again interact? The only alternative is that our universe is a finite are with an outside edge suspended in -- what? Nothingness?
@@belablasco6681 this could go back and forth for quite a while, but the truth is I don't really understand the nature of the universe and all that exists. Although, I do not believe that the only alternatives are bubble universes or a finite universe hanging like snow globe in nothingness.
@@rafeller9057 The most commonly accepted scenario among cosmologists today is of an eternal inflation continually producing Big Bangs separated by infinities of space resulting in an ever-increasing number of bubble universes, and this may have been happening forever.
Yeah it means we're all going to jump into a big Jacuzzi hot tub together haha
. Below the surface of the water there's a another universe and dimension and it's inflating. 🤪
If space goes on ad infinitum out from us, it too must go on ad infinitum within us. Dimensions so big, and so small, that we cannot conceive of them, in our universe. But likewise, any conscious matter on those scales would be unable to conceive or detect our own finite area of space we occupy. Trippy. We could be just one of a near infinite number of universes tucked within one another like Russian dolls 🪆
God is Santa Clause for adult theists. Multiverses are Santa Clause(s) for adult atheists. Where's my Nobel prize?
Your not getting it, you are on the naughty list!
so, basically, fractals?
🇮🇸 shoutout Iceland
When the blind talk about colors.
A multiverse would likely mean start of this universe was at least partly scientific.
If we are able to be in two places at once then time travel could be possible?
No.
@@donkique956 Why not?
You mean: what do they mean? !
My mind is blown two of us can exist at one time we can be in two places at 1 time like an electron. WTF
Nice travel related tax expense🤣
I stand stoned by the reach of reality
Isn't the "universe" theory (vs multiverse) less reasonable? Comparable to MONO-theism?
I don't buy fine tuning necessarily. Maybe it'd take longer for dark energy's effects to make life hospitable (or less long). Maybe a different generation of fundamental particles would constitute stable matter. Perhaps there are many different configurations for different types of matter and life to happen.
Where is all the energy coming from?
Maybe the energy is an expression of some underlying, eternal principle, a nothingness that expands infinitely.
These profs have to vacation to think
You don't have to be a chicken to know an egg Mr. Davies.
The way I think of Parallel Universes is that they would all be different - in some universes there is life, like ours, other universes are dead universes. Life in other universes might be totally different - maybe silicon based, the laws would be totally different - we would not be able to exist in those universes
But I bet there is no universe where God is a Sugar Daddy catering to the pleasures of the flesh of billions of old dead people just sitting about/snoring away/chatting/sitting/floating about staring at each other
Every time I ask a theist - one does one DO in Heaven? They run away
Do they think of their loved ones down on earth? They might be suffering/starving/homeless/crying/jobless/abused/beaten/tortured? Does being in Heaven mean not caring anymore?
No one asks such questions because that would make religious leaders uncomfortable
The media, the Philosophers & the educated complicit and keeping the Ponzi-scheme of Heaven going
Indeed, "heaven" would be hell. We live to explain and to solve problems. A non-problematic environment would be a hell of monotony. Monotony would extinguish the human mind.
@@patmoran5339 Heaven IS here -basically these people want an easy lazy life - nothing to do, no worries all the while shamelessly sponging off a Sugar Daddy God
Well, that is the life of a Dog! It's master feeds, protects, shelters and cares for it - zero work or responsibilities or worries - Heaven!
Fools Chasing after Fools Gold get what they deserve
@@ramaraksha01 I think that might be true for a tiny, tiny minority of people. I believe that the overwhelming majority are not like that at all. Most of the people who are "fools" could be easily convinced that there is a better way given the right knowledge with good presentation of the facts that we live in the most peaceful and prosperous time in the history of human existence and that there are no upper limits on the value of human ideas.
@@patmoran5339 Not one asks - What exactly do we DO in Heaven? NOT ONE! We are going to spend eternity there - what do we do there? Chat about? All the talk is about how we will meet our loved ones and then what? What do we do on a daily basis?
Religions don't like that question because they have no answers
The question is more difficult than it looks
If they say we work, ok what kind of work? What work does the All-Might God is engaged in? Running factories making widgets that get exported to the universe next door?
So that's out and we end up with billions of lazy bums sitting about/snoring away for eternity!
And this is the Grand Plan of God?
Clearly anyone with an ounce of intelligence can see that this is just a fantasy being peddled by religions
And the frightening thing is the silence - the media, the educated NOT asking question knowing that religious people don't like such questions to be asked
And so they are complicit in keeping this ponzi-scheme going
And such ponzi-schemes have killed innocent people - like that young teacher beheaded in France
The hands of the educated, media, the philosopher and the moral are stained with the blood of innocents
@@ramaraksha01 You might want to think about this too. The group of people who recoil from the idea of prolonging the average life-span to say, maybe 150 years or more through the advances in medical science, is rejected by these same people. In other words, they are OK with immortality as long as it is their god who provides it.
So ,in a infinite amount of universes, with a infinite amount of possibilities, is a possibility that this universe was created by a been, all powerful outside our universe, in other words a been from other universe created our universe, he or she or any gender you can choose can control everything from this universe, again is possible in a infinite amount of possibilities, make sense right.??
Does this mean there is a universe where Magic is real!? ...
If it's real, it isn't magic.
@@randysteele6741 If there are an infinite number of universes, then there is a pretty good chance that one of them has something akin to magic. The point being that both theories are ridiculous and unproven and in all likelihood will never be observed.
This is my theory without numbers or letters on the expansion of the universe, it's one universe creating more of itself.
[ ] -> I [] [ ] [ ] [ ] [->
How can there be an infinite number of anything? If there are numbers of anything then there can't be infinite numbers. If anything can exist, it can be counted.
.....and if you ad 1 to a known # it bicomes bigger.....and you can add 1 to ANY # ,....of anything.
Exactly, and this simple truth is so obvious and fundamental, it is literally shocking how so many otherwise intelligent people just don't seem to get it. In reality, there can only be one infinity, and that single infinity must be all inclusive and contain everything in existence. In other words, if you postulate multiple universes, then how is the singular infinity affected? It isn't!
What about space and time? They could be continuous, and therefore uncountable infinite in any interval.
It's the formation of matter that quantifies time and distance but can matter exist without the dilation of time and space? How much matter is required? Isn't it all the singularities and super massive gravitational wells that hold the universe together? It seems like a case of all or none. Atoms themselves are bound up packets of energy. 20 some of the most common elements, combined packets of energy, are functional parts, EACH ONE essential for life. (20 of them!) An equal amount (20 some) of other common elements are beneficial to life. The instruction for life isn't even a physical thing. It's a concatenation of a molecule (the ordering of elements) that is various unique written commands or programming that result(s) in different living organisms that fight entropy for a while, spawning new generations by command. How can you even believe or think there isn't a very wise intelligent powerful cause for everything that we see and consciously experience? It is the very definition of God to be all knowing, all powerful and the cause of everything there is (the God of gods). The goat herders 🐐 were able to understand that 😳💥🙄‼️😆🤣😂 so what is your problem? 🙄🙄🙄🙂😁 Logic and math required for the formation of matter and programming etc???❓❓❓That is the proof of God.💥‼️ 🤔
It is actually evidence _against_ god.
@@ferdinandkraft857 Thanks for proving nothing.
Don't want to sound like a troll, but I can't help ask this question and don't think of me as a religious nut. Have anybody heard of Occam's Razor, where basically the simplest or simpler answer is likely to be the right one. Believing in the Big Bang, as atheists do, is believing in a metaphysical event. So should then another metaphysical explanation not also be considered: People are quite willing to believe in more difficult things than God. God is no less metaphysical than the Big Bang, which is the ultimate trick that a Magician could produce, all matter from nothing (it sounds God-like). That's a tough thing to believe and yet we are asked to believe it.
God is also metaphysical, that strikes me as a simpler and maybe even the simplest answer. Then why is it so unacceptable and people run a hundred miles away from it?
*What makes the idea of God so unacceptable?*
.
The problem of Evil, the contradictions within and between religious narratives, natural selection, unanswered prayers etc...
God is absurd
It means that there’s a Creator.
No.
@@melgrossyou also are entitled to your opinion.
A miltiverse doesn't solve anything.
True, but a dictionary will.
KoldCerealKiller You believe in magical dictionaries now?