I remember when I was a kid in the PS2 era, my friend was telling me how he read about video games will never be able to have photorealistic graphics because lighting is too complicated even for future CPUs to process. I thought about that alot, years later, when I was learning how to paint. Ray-tracing as a "cheat code" to only simulate the lighting needed and thus reducing CPU power needed - is sort of a miraculous innovation. When people invent stuff like this it is the type of thing that should be on the news tbh.
It’s pretty freaking cool but I think it’s still an incredibly demanding technology and sad to say that *most* dev teams never implement it properly to begin with. Though I have seen some absolutely mind blowing single person projects that make heavy use of Raytracing using Unity 3D and they look fuckin amazing
Bruh, I quit college because of this, I am an undergraduate Architect who has a $#*tty school and a professor who has a stroke. He is really salty and does not want other young professors to take over his position. All we did was trace a freakin floor plan made by other people from his glory days while he talked about how good he was back in the day, for freakin 4 hours!! Then one time he kinda got cocky and told us if we didn't get a freakin projector because he can't find his, he will give us all an F. So he pointed at me and told me to find one, so I found one! Then when I got back from finding a projector, this old bag told me I was late! And scream at my face, and my fucking head just burst and I shout at his half-drooled face that he should quit and let another young professor take over. What a f*ck*n beta. After that, I just downloaded a bunch of online courses and free youtube videos, and I freakin learned a lot! Like a freak ton of architectural knowledge, and I said freak Architecture I am gonna be a game developer instead and I did LOL. And until now, I am a freakin game developer and I am really happy about it! Thanks to youtube videos and online courses.
@@bulbulitobayagbagan9633wow bro, i was actually going to school for architecture but switched my major to computer science as it seemed to deem itself more beneficial, i wanna be an entrepreneur through college and comp sci has a lot of doors
@@thestromdargon6205 Yeah, usually if a professor is so old, they don't admit that they failed in life, especially these days where knowledge is constantly moving! That's why I decided to drop out and just learn anything I want as long as I have a road map of something I wanna learn, everyone can be unstoppable.
Excellent video. Straight to the point and, as a layman, I still fully understood what you were explaining. Most UA-camrs would have took a good 15+ minutes (not to mention the pointless intro, channel logo vid and the half time advert) trying to convey what you amply covered in less than two minutes. Thank you.
Basically ray tracing simulates the way light actually works. Normally games have lighting that is “hand crafted”. Like a painter painting a picture. They add everything to make it look good themselves. Ray tracing is mostly done “automatically” by a computer.
Ray-tracing (and simulated ray tracing) is a game changer for simulated graphics. The second we realised every material reflects to a certain extent, games began to look way better.
subscribed for the concise manner of explanation, though with the way you explain, i wouldnt mind long form videos from you either. Keep it up! Thank you
Great video! You gave a pretty comprehensive explanation in less then half the time of linus tech tips' "techquickie" video on this subject. Keep it up!
Take the plane generated by the normal to the surface of your object and the incoming ray. The reflected ray is the uniquely defined ray that is contained in this plane and that forms a signed angle with the normal that is equal to the negated angle formed by the incoming ray mutiplied by -1
@@valovanonym yea i found that out, just take the angle between the normal and the incoming ray and then take the angle away from the normal and thats the new ray. Basically, flip the incoming ray relative to the normal
the direction(s) a ray bounces in is dependent on the surface material it intersects with. for a diffuse object (e.g. paper) the ray can bounce off in all directions. for a perfect mirror on the other hand, the ray is only reflected perfectly off the surface in one direction. for a glossy surface, the ray is bounced off mostly in the direction of a perfect reflection (like a mirror) but with a bit of variation, giving blurry reflections. for glass, the ray can be both reflected off the surface and also transmitted through the surface. the ways the ray can be bounced off of a surface can be described by one of its potentially many BxDFs (bidirectional X distribution function) where the X is a catch-all to represent many things such as R for reflection, T for transmittance, and other phenomena i didn’t mention like subsurface scattering as for how you actually calculate the bounce direction mathematically, that can get quite involved for anything other than a perfect mirror which @valovanonym described
The specular reflection function is incoming - 2(incoming • norm)norm and the resulting vector can be randomly skewed to mimic roughness but a proper random distribution function is required to make it look convincing and any vectors facing into the surface need to be removed
Exactly. Rtx was introduced as less power lasting than the regular way. Nowadays its better without rtx. And really there is no big difference with or without rtx when the game developers did their thing right (as in hogwarts legacy and atomic heart). It simply runs waaaay better with rtx off and doesnt look any worse as with rtx on. Nvidia is running to a dead end there, amd hopefully will make it better.
@@DS-tr6xn RT global illumination has a greater impact on Visual than any rt settings. Look at cyberpunk, dying light 2, fortnite and even Minecraft or metro exodus. Those games offers RT global illumination
@@ForceInEvHorizon ah ok, maybe thats the problem. It is a new technique that needs a gpu years ahead of the overprized nvidia gpus of today... welp, I dont see the difference in graphics either so it doesnt matter if rtx off, simple rtx or global illumination on. All it does is dropping the framerate. This is great.
I got a chance to mess around with the early ray tracing algorithms, on a 386DX processor/math co processor, that would output into a Raw Targa file. I had to code the scene using basic geometric primitives and (x.y.z) coordinates, there wasn't even a GUI out for it. Had to draw everything out by hand on graph paper, then write it out in ASCII for the render software. it would take hours to render one frame. I met two other kids doing similar stuff on a 486DX computer around the same time, they are the brothers strause who would create one of the first VFX companies in Santa Monica, and then eventually that ran Hydrolux studio.
if you ever come back to polish this , re-record the lines around 1:05 - 1:20 , some of the words are very difficult to understand . thank you for making this video ! for anyone looking , elbert says : " ray tracing , as it stands now , is just too computationally expensive in a gaming context , where the screen needs to be recalculated 60 times a second . even ~~in~~ demos today you see are still hybrids of raytracing and rasterizing , the current widespread way of rendering graphics in games , but its the software that software developers and hardware manufacturers are optimizing towards . "
I'm an amateur 3D artist. Raytracing still needs some work, especially in things like reflection. I work with Unreal Engine 5 that has Lumen Raytracing technology and the reflection on that is so bad, still so far away from the physically accurate Pathtracing.
I understand the concept of raytracing. Still, i don't seem to have an eye for noticing raytracing. I have tried games where they have a raytracing option so you can test out both visuals but when I have distinguish the two the only thing I'm noticing is lower frame rate and really no change to shadows. Maybe within the next generation of consoles where frame rate is less of an issue on that raytracing will be radically noticeable, but at this stage it's not something I'm needing to have for my games
A lot of games don’t use raytracing for everything, only for small subset of the effects, and at this point there are faster algorithms to fake these effects and get almost the same image. Most games don’t use full potential of the technology and have it just as a marketing tool
When RT/fidelity mode is on, shadows will have a sharper outline and more accurate. reflections off of rain ponds, metal surfaces etc will also be sharper and accurate, less of a blob or blur of texture, that’s what I notice at least, with RT off and performance mode on, shadows and reflections/refractions look more blocky and ‘plastic’
For me i just look at mirrors in game to see if they reflect. If you’ve gamed for a long time you’d notice that mirrors in games are completely blurred out and don’t work at all in like 90% of games. The only games where mirrors worked before raytracing weren’t real reflections and used other workarounds. A lot of them simply rendered a scene twice to make it look like a real reflection. But only raytracing creates real reflections.
Great video, I like it 🙂👍🏻 RT is an important advance at 3D filmography, but only an enhancement for 3D games, since those calculations are heavy, specially done in real-time at high framerate process (low latency) I suggest it to be an optional graphic selection, but not a "must"
RT is cool but the only problem is that deym game dev really like to make everything reflective. Like bruh. Not all surfaces are shiny and reflect images.
Is there such thing as "cheap raytracing"? Like if I wanted Minecraft to run, is there a way to get low-quality raytracing, like it doesn't do as precise calculations or something?
Probably the most non-explaining explanation I could think of. The "computer hoops" you mentioned are still there no matter what rendering technique you use, as you always need lightmodels, texture handling, environment functions (think fog layers and volumes etc), in-shader transforms etc; raytracing should just be taken as a forward+/deferred shading path with a more complex and controllable sampling pattern (opposed to the rasterizing techniques giving you only the samples fetched from perspective or orthogonal projections which number you should keep at minimum, hence most engines just use the same projection as used for the screen itself). Also the only thing the RT gives you today are the secondary rays (think any kind of light bouncing and transmission), it is still too slow to render the primary rays in a manner that would be worth it (say, muti-sampled DOF or fish-eye/barrel). And it won't really go too far like this, as the problem is in it's roots: for RT or RM, the complexity of the intersection function is not much of a problem, the count of those functions is, however. Now say we render a sphere, how many triangles do we need? 100-something for a very rough mess. Or one simple calculation for a nice and smooth result, but the current-day graphics only use triangles, and feature no automation for converting surfaces into a smaller number of intersection functions - so in this sphere example you get a 100x performance drop. And yes, the "RTX cores" can simply speed up the triangle scan-out to a point it "somewhat works", yet don't even think of multi-sampled tracing/bouncing against a high-poly scene.
If ray tracing was not a thing so the scientists had been the victim and was the most powerful and the best way about it is that it was the most common practice to use
@@Platinum199 With native FPS? Or enhanced with DLSS? Because if you look it up, 4000 series only get about 20 native FPS on the game. Raytracing is not ready for this generation.
Not advancing enough for me to call my ps4 2.0 a ps5. The "next gen" feeling consoles have these days are the same as upgrading your iPhone every couple years..👎
Good video but you really need to work on your talking. I understand you might have an accent but this is for people who are trying to learn, and you need to make sure your words are clear and concise.
I don't understand what exactly retiring do but from what i understand samthin you by able to before what try to say is have see meny realistic sean and refletion videos before realistic is thinking what is make the retracing that exating and meny time at least on the game the have worsh quality with retracing on i believe that is mestick from the development because rtx is samthin new and the development don't know the foul potesion yet same happens for eny new technology i remember before A few years eny game has same form off here matial because that the new thing from that graphic card and rember that here matials The have problems like no decals and other semuler stuff from e few of this games now not only the here matials is samthin standard the don't have eny off this problem because evry stoudio knows how to use that properly Another thing meny time new technology appear the development the over use that technology
Ray tracing has been around for 30 years, but only in the last 6-10 has it been possible to use real time in video games, before it would take hours or even days to render scenes with rays that still have noise but now you can render reflections, GI and or shadows in real time with pretty good denoising
That’s probably the objects and textures themselves and not ray tracing. Like look at 1:04 and tell me how that is uncanny valley to you. I guarantee if you were showed that picture with 0 context you’d think it was just a photograph of some food items. Also uncanny valley only really applies to things resembling human beings I think.
@@zigsteenine8650 1:04 is somewhat realistic, but there are so many scenes in this video that are uncanny valley. Look at 1:14, 1:23, 1:39 and the scenes of Control. Maybe "uncanny valley" isn't exactly the correct term, but there is still a feel to those scenes that seems like the reflections are overdone and therefore unrealistic.
I remember when I was a kid in the PS2 era, my friend was telling me how he read about video games will never be able to have photorealistic graphics because lighting is too complicated even for future CPUs to process. I thought about that alot, years later, when I was learning how to paint. Ray-tracing as a "cheat code" to only simulate the lighting needed and thus reducing CPU power needed - is sort of a miraculous innovation. When people invent stuff like this it is the type of thing that should be on the news tbh.
calm down....current raytracing is just marketing thing....
raytracing was invented in 90s
raytracing is real
@@RachaelMyLovelyGirl the two piece is real too
It’s pretty freaking cool but I think it’s still an incredibly demanding technology and sad to say that *most* dev teams never implement it properly to begin with. Though I have seen some absolutely mind blowing single person projects that make heavy use of Raytracing using Unity 3D and they look fuckin amazing
You explained it in 3 mins, better than my computer graphics teacher for which she took 3 lectures of 45 mins each
Bruh, I quit college because of this, I am an undergraduate Architect who has a $#*tty school and a professor who has a stroke. He is really salty and does not want other young professors to take over his position. All we did was trace a freakin floor plan made by other people from his glory days while he talked about how good he was back in the day, for freakin 4 hours!! Then one time he kinda got cocky and told us if we didn't get a freakin projector because he can't find his, he will give us all an F. So he pointed at me and told me to find one, so I found one! Then when I got back from finding a projector, this old bag told me I was late! And scream at my face, and my fucking head just burst and I shout at his half-drooled face that he should quit and let another young professor take over. What a f*ck*n beta.
After that, I just downloaded a bunch of online courses and free youtube videos, and I freakin learned a lot! Like a freak ton of architectural knowledge, and I said freak Architecture I am gonna be a game developer instead and I did LOL. And until now, I am a freakin game developer and I am really happy about it! Thanks to youtube videos and online courses.
@@bulbulitobayagbagan9633wow bro, i was actually going to school for architecture but switched my major to computer science as it seemed to deem itself more beneficial, i wanna be an entrepreneur through college and comp sci has a lot of doors
@@bulbulitobayagbagan9633 some teachers make learning hell.
Maybe becsue the teacher gave you a deeper understanding including applicatoons, formulas and how to use it in certain programs.
@@thestromdargon6205 Yeah, usually if a professor is so old, they don't admit that they failed in life, especially these days where knowledge is constantly moving! That's why I decided to drop out and just learn anything I want as long as I have a road map of something I wanna learn, everyone can be unstoppable.
Excellent video. Straight to the point and, as a layman, I still fully understood what you were explaining.
Most UA-camrs would have took a good 15+ minutes (not to mention the pointless intro, channel logo vid and the half time advert) trying to convey what you amply covered in less than two minutes. Thank you.
its not 'pointless' if youre building a career off of youtube, he, is clearly not and therefore he doesnt need much recognisation and branding
@@xyzabc12345jkl I was speaking from my point of view.
You forgot: and a sponsor 😆
@@xyzabc12345jkl You can make a career without all that garbage.
Awesome video, the visuals and the script are both very well put together and are more functionally concise than anything else out there. Thank you!
i clicked on this video knowing damn well i won't understand a thing even if this guy explained it in the best way possible.
Basically ray tracing simulates the way light actually works. Normally games have lighting that is “hand crafted”. Like a painter painting a picture. They add everything to make it look good themselves. Ray tracing is mostly done “automatically” by a computer.
Short and concise explanation, good for getting started, thanks!
Ray-tracing (and simulated ray tracing) is a game changer for simulated graphics. The second we realised every material reflects to a certain extent, games began to look way better.
subscribed for the concise manner of explanation, though with the way you explain, i wouldnt mind long form videos from you either. Keep it up! Thank you
That thumbnail made me think this was a most extreme video.
Great video! You gave a pretty comprehensive explanation in less then half the time of linus tech tips' "techquickie" video on this subject. Keep it up!
This video is so underrated
Nicely animated and good explanation!
Level of Editing🔥✨
Amazing vid, keep it up (:
Thank you for making a simple and consise explanation. It was also an enjoyable vidio
Great Explanation! Loved it!
me2
So instead from light to eye
eye to all lights
very nice video!
omfg why does no one explain how to calculate the direction the ray bounces to
This. Didn't anyhow explain how this actually works.
Take the plane generated by the normal to the surface of your object and the incoming ray. The reflected ray is the uniquely defined ray that is contained in this plane and that forms a signed angle with the normal that is equal to the negated angle formed by the incoming ray mutiplied by -1
@@valovanonym yea i found that out, just take the angle between the normal and the incoming ray and then take the angle away from the normal and thats the new ray. Basically, flip the incoming ray relative to the normal
the direction(s) a ray bounces in is dependent on the surface material it intersects with. for a diffuse object (e.g. paper) the ray can bounce off in all directions. for a perfect mirror on the other hand, the ray is only reflected perfectly off the surface in one direction. for a glossy surface, the ray is bounced off mostly in the direction of a perfect reflection (like a mirror) but with a bit of variation, giving blurry reflections. for glass, the ray can be both reflected off the surface and also transmitted through the surface. the ways the ray can be bounced off of a surface can be described by one of its potentially many BxDFs (bidirectional X distribution function) where the X is a catch-all to represent many things such as R for reflection, T for transmittance, and other phenomena i didn’t mention like subsurface scattering
as for how you actually calculate the bounce direction mathematically, that can get quite involved for anything other than a perfect mirror which @valovanonym described
The specular reflection function is incoming - 2(incoming • norm)norm and the resulting vector can be randomly skewed to mimic roughness but a proper random distribution function is required to make it look convincing and any vectors facing into the surface need to be removed
RTX when it came out: OMG This is amazing! Look at the detail
RTX today: RTX Off
Exactly. Rtx was introduced as less power lasting than the regular way. Nowadays its better without rtx. And really there is no big difference with or without rtx when the game developers did their thing right (as in hogwarts legacy and atomic heart). It simply runs waaaay better with rtx off and doesnt look any worse as with rtx on. Nvidia is running to a dead end there, amd hopefully will make it better.
@@DS-tr6xn these days it's more for productive use
@@DS-tr6xn it exists for Minecraft and Forza 5 lol
@@DS-tr6xn RT global illumination has a greater impact on Visual than any rt settings. Look at cyberpunk, dying light 2, fortnite and even Minecraft or metro exodus. Those games offers RT global illumination
@@ForceInEvHorizon ah ok, maybe thats the problem. It is a new technique that needs a gpu years ahead of the overprized nvidia gpus of today... welp, I dont see the difference in graphics either so it doesnt matter if rtx off, simple rtx or global illumination on. All it does is dropping the framerate. This is great.
Well done video, good job
I got a chance to mess around with the early ray tracing algorithms, on a 386DX processor/math co processor, that would output into a Raw Targa file. I had to code the scene using basic geometric primitives and (x.y.z) coordinates, there wasn't even a GUI out for it. Had to draw everything out by hand on graph paper, then write it out in ASCII for the render software. it would take hours to render one frame. I met two other kids doing similar stuff on a 486DX computer around the same time, they are the brothers strause who would create one of the first VFX companies in Santa Monica, and then eventually that ran Hydrolux studio.
Thank you, Elbert
if you ever come back to polish this , re-record the lines around 1:05 - 1:20 , some of the words are very difficult to understand .
thank you for making this video !
for anyone looking , elbert says : " ray tracing , as it stands now , is just too computationally expensive in a gaming context , where the screen needs to be recalculated 60 times a second . even ~~in~~ demos today you see are still hybrids of raytracing and rasterizing , the current widespread way of rendering graphics in games , but its the software that software developers and hardware manufacturers are optimizing towards . "
Awesome video. But btw I'm curious about how you made this animation. I guess you used houdini?
Amazing ❤️
Kinda Interesting :D !
Very clear explanation 🎉
wait until my pc sees this
it's crazy that this has been a thing since 1979
Underrated
Understood better thanks
I'm an amateur 3D artist. Raytracing still needs some work, especially in things like reflection. I work with Unreal Engine 5 that has Lumen Raytracing technology and the reflection on that is so bad, still so far away from the physically accurate Pathtracing.
천재가 많네요 역시
Very cool explanation! But if I can give some tips on the video itself, next time try to speak a bit slower
thank you
Raytracing on a reflective material will never be as beautiful as a cubemap reflection.
So more accurate brightness of objects?
Cool
I understand the concept of raytracing. Still, i don't seem to have an eye for noticing raytracing. I have tried games where they have a raytracing option so you can test out both visuals but when I have distinguish the two the only thing I'm noticing is lower frame rate and really no change to shadows. Maybe within the next generation of consoles where frame rate is less of an issue on that raytracing will be radically noticeable, but at this stage it's not something I'm needing to have for my games
A lot of games don’t use raytracing for everything, only for small subset of the effects, and at this point there are faster algorithms to fake these effects and get almost the same image. Most games don’t use full potential of the technology and have it just as a marketing tool
When RT/fidelity mode is on, shadows will have a sharper outline and more accurate. reflections off of rain ponds, metal surfaces etc will also be sharper and accurate, less of a blob or blur of texture, that’s what I notice at least, with RT off and performance mode on, shadows and reflections/refractions look more blocky and ‘plastic’
For me i just look at mirrors in game to see if they reflect. If you’ve gamed for a long time you’d notice that mirrors in games are completely blurred out and don’t work at all in like 90% of games. The only games where mirrors worked before raytracing weren’t real reflections and used other workarounds. A lot of them simply rendered a scene twice to make it look like a real reflection. But only raytracing creates real reflections.
nice.
What is the name of the videogame that showed the woman with the gun?
what was that game shown at the end? it looks very intresting
Control
That's the first, ever, intelligent video Ive ever seen form americans on youtube.
Great video, I like it 🙂👍🏻
RT is an important advance at 3D filmography, but only an enhancement for 3D games, since those calculations are heavy, specially done in real-time at high framerate process (low latency)
I suggest it to be an optional graphic selection, but not a "must"
It is optional, just like most other more basic graphic settings…….
Cool name
Thanks for the explanation!!. Did you use any special tool to make the video?
The animations were done in blender
nice
thanks
RT is cool but the only problem is that deym game dev really like to make everything reflective. Like bruh. Not all surfaces are shiny and reflect images.
RT is still in its infancy.
I love the part of the video where you speak up and don’t mumble
Is there such thing as "cheap raytracing"? Like if I wanted Minecraft to run, is there a way to get low-quality raytracing, like it doesn't do as precise calculations or something?
Minecraft shaders do basically what you said
@@yeeter_29829 Oh, I guess I just need a better computer.
Cool but will the game be fun?
t moshee XDDD LOOOL en vrai bien la vidéo 😎
Someone should remake the scene on the simpsons where he goes to that green realm but youse model of yourself instead of homer
Thanks french boy
hours of class turned into 2 minuters
0:03 what game is this
That one guy in the comments asking why highschool trigonometry isn't explained lol
i got a 3080 and still never bothered to understand the tech any further than “makes everything pretty”
Which game you are playing in this video?
The game is “Control”.
raytracing explained: its too expensive for me.
Ohhhhh
We’re you recording the voice right after visiting a dentist?
but then you also have raycasting and raymarching
It's the matrix
I read the title as "racism explained"
How so few subs?
Heres the 5 second explanation. 50% less fps
Probably the most non-explaining explanation I could think of. The "computer hoops" you mentioned are still there no matter what rendering technique you use, as you always need lightmodels, texture handling, environment functions (think fog layers and volumes etc), in-shader transforms etc; raytracing should just be taken as a forward+/deferred shading path with a more complex and controllable sampling pattern (opposed to the rasterizing techniques giving you only the samples fetched from perspective or orthogonal projections which number you should keep at minimum, hence most engines just use the same projection as used for the screen itself). Also the only thing the RT gives you today are the secondary rays (think any kind of light bouncing and transmission), it is still too slow to render the primary rays in a manner that would be worth it (say, muti-sampled DOF or fish-eye/barrel). And it won't really go too far like this, as the problem is in it's roots: for RT or RM, the complexity of the intersection function is not much of a problem, the count of those functions is, however. Now say we render a sphere, how many triangles do we need? 100-something for a very rough mess. Or one simple calculation for a nice and smooth result, but the current-day graphics only use triangles, and feature no automation for converting surfaces into a smaller number of intersection functions - so in this sphere example you get a 100x performance drop. And yes, the "RTX cores" can simply speed up the triangle scan-out to a point it "somewhat works", yet don't even think of multi-sampled tracing/bouncing against a high-poly scene.
Mate nobody is going to read that I sat there and read that beucase I wanted to know your horrible opinion.
I ain't reading allat
Bro just saying words
The usual condescending nerd with too much free time
@@newkg3591 Nah I just type fuck fast, thanks VHDL :P
James😂
Claim your ‘here before this hits a million views ticket’ here!
dont record while eating.
If ray tracing was not a thing so the scientists had been the victim and was the most powerful and the best way about it is that it was the most common practice to use
This is why punctuation is important.
@@Lynxee3004 hahah seriously. Had a stroke reading this
Godzilla had a stroke trying to read this and fucking died
what are you saying bro 😭
@@Lynxee3004 fr
Just bake on the textures ray tracing isnt ready for games even on the 4000 series Nvidia.
Amen. The shambles that was Portal RTX is a fine, fine example of "See you in 2033, maybe"
I ran portal raytracing fine, Forza horizon 5, and a few other games
@@Platinum199 With native FPS? Or enhanced with DLSS? Because if you look it up, 4000 series only get about 20 native FPS on the game. Raytracing is not ready for this generation.
@@lenoirxusing dlss looks no different then with it off but it raises the frame rate insanely highly
@@Platinum199 Yeah, that's why I'm asking. Try playing portal with RTX without DLSS, then tell me the result. I would expect you to have
Funny part is, that this is how people thought optics worked pretty much until the renaissance
Ok i dont get it
Swallow the porridge before making the voiceover for your next video.
Next time you create a video do not forget to speak clearly.
Ъ
Not advancing enough for me to call my ps4 2.0 a ps5. The "next gen" feeling consoles have these days are the same as upgrading your iPhone every couple years..👎
-30 fps
Good video but you really need to work on your talking. I understand you might have an accent but this is for people who are trying to learn, and you need to make sure your words are clear and concise.
I can't understand what he speaks
I don't understand what exactly retiring do but from what i understand samthin you by able to before what try to say is have see meny realistic sean and refletion videos before realistic is thinking what is make the retracing that exating and meny time at least on the game the have worsh quality with retracing on i believe that is mestick from the development because rtx is samthin new and the development don't know the foul potesion yet same happens for eny new technology i remember before A few years eny game has same form off here matial because that the new thing from that graphic card and rember that here matials The have problems like no decals and other semuler stuff from e few of this games now not only the here matials is samthin standard the don't have eny off this problem because evry stoudio knows how to use that properly Another thing meny time new technology appear the development the over use that technology
Ouch my brain
@@Wahunganganshapunck 😂
Please learn how to use punctuation
I don't want to be the grammar police but now I do...
@@keshi5541 you should for now
The rays are traced.
You have stop chewing while you speak
pov ray = poo
Ray-tracing... invented by NVidia and their best hardware can't even try to handle it... talk about a self-own.
Boooooooring
After 1.31 seconds of watching I’m already bored, sorry but I can’t keep watching
Ok Albert Einstein
I mean sounds like a no-brainer, it took 30 years for them to figure this out? Weird.
Ray tracing has been around for 30 years, but only in the last 6-10 has it been possible to use real time in video games, before it would take hours or even days to render scenes with rays that still have noise but now you can render reflections, GI and or shadows in real time with pretty good denoising
Something about raytracing is still very uncanny valley for me personally. Just doesn't look realistic.
That’s probably the objects and textures themselves and not ray tracing. Like look at 1:04 and tell me how that is uncanny valley to you. I guarantee if you were showed that picture with 0 context you’d think it was just a photograph of some food items. Also uncanny valley only really applies to things resembling human beings I think.
@@zigsteenine8650 1:04 is somewhat realistic, but there are so many scenes in this video that are uncanny valley. Look at 1:14, 1:23, 1:39 and the scenes of Control. Maybe "uncanny valley" isn't exactly the correct term, but there is still a feel to those scenes that seems like the reflections are overdone and therefore unrealistic.
Gaytracing