ग्राम पंचायत भूखे लोगों की नहीं सुन रही है, उनको सुनना हमारा फर्ज़ है, वाह जज हो तो ऐसे |
Вставка
- Опубліковано 20 сер 2024
- ग्राम पंचायत भूखे लोगों की नहीं सुन रही है, उनको सुनना हमारा फर्ज़ है, वाह जज हो तो ऐसे | #law #ias
Courtesy: MP Highcourt/youtube
watch full video 👉 mp high court
Image credit: Google
*This Video Is Strictly For Legal Awareness And Education Purpose Only. 📚
Top Of The Best Law Educational And Law Motivational Video Available Here For You Guys.
Country's Top Judge's And Lawyer's Motivation Story And Judgement Videos Provided By UTV Court24.
कानून सबके लिए है ,सबके लिए -एक है.
कानून के लिए जागरूक बने,नागरिक अपने हक को जाने,
कानून हर नागरिक के लिए
जानना जरूरी है..।।
Hon'ble chief justice of India -
देश के आखिरी कोने तक ,हर नागरिक तक
कानूनी जागरूकता पहुंचनी चाहिए.
इस अभियान में हमारा साथ दे दोस्तों।।
Everyone aware of the law of India.
Please Don't Forget..
SUBSCRIBE LIKE & SHARE
WITH COMMENT ON
This Channel's Videos
A Big Thank You Guys With ❤️.
High court upsc.
Supreme court current affairs update.
How to become High Court judge in India.
Advocate practice in court.
Delhi high court advocate.
Divorce hearing in court India.
Allahabad high court judgement order.
Uspe motivational video.
Supreme court lawyers vs ias.
Important case laws for judicial exams.
Allahabad high court vacancy.
Judges of supreme court of india.
Top class argument Seniors.
2024 current affairs.
#supremecourt #guiltminds #courtlivestream #indianlaw #ias #criminaljustice #argument #2023 #legal #judiciary #IAS #utvcourt24 #justice #mphighcourt #advocate #judge #indiaCourtLive #cgl #india #upsc #JusticeAshutoshkumar #learnlaw #orissahighcourt #2024
justice Rohit Arya
justice Vivek Agarwal. justice Sandeep Kumar. judiciary of India.Indian court.law student.law education.Indian law.best justice of India.education system.justice motivational video.reaction video
Supreme Court of India
high court allahabad
mp high court
High Court Of Andhra Pradesh
High Court of Gujarat
Punjab and Haryana High Court Chandigarh
Madhya Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Supreme court
Patna High Court
Allahabad High Court
High Court of Chhattisgarh
High court of Jammu and Kashmir
Disclaimer
Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, commenting, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair use.
WOw, He gave complete explanation of the judgement and also educated. Very wise Judge. Wishing him all the best that he is chosen for Supreme Court Judge position.
Wow, wish he is our Supreme Court JUDGE 🙏
अगर देश में न्याय व्यवस्था में नेक इमानदार और जनता के रक्षक न्यायाधीश आ जाएं तो देश स्वर्ग बन जाए।
HEARTIEST CONGRATULATIONS TO SUCH JUDGE AND HIS NOBLE THOUGHTS.
What a line, "mein jitna bolta hoon, I have courage to write it down"! Wish many Hon. Judges, who keep making news-making, eyeball-grabbing oral observations but pass orders contrary to what they have been saying during arguments during the entire case develop courage like the Hon. Justice Alhuwalia.
Yes, court arguement is like playing chess board. Good advocate should anticipate always what will be the counter arguement. Really appreciate this judge's statement on the capacity of good advocates.
Very nice judgement
wow Sir Respect Mr Gurpal singh Aluwaliya you are the back bone of Justice ❤
Vidwan jadaj sahab jaysa deyas key beymano ka ilaj karney ka dhanyavad. Jeweym sardah satam.
Truth ❤PAGG ❤Respect ❤️one god AKAL
SUCH JUDGES SHOULD BE PROMOTED TO SUPREME COURT OF INDIA.
गरीब कि कभी स sunvaee Nahin Hoti Hai Hamesha Amir Logon ki hoti hai garibon ko Kuchh Nahin Milta Mere Ko Milta Hai
100% garib ko sunnewala koi nahi hota hai sirf garib ke sath khanapurti hota hai
Jaj saheB Sacha se
Singh uncle ji ko pradhanmantri bnana chaheye India ka
very good decision has been given by the honourable judge.
सरदार जी न्याय की गोली खाय हुए है । कोई भी इनका टेस्ट चेंज नहीं कर सकता है।
Asay jusge sab 100. Ho to pure desh shanti ho sakti hai.desh ki 90 pratishat samsyao ka hal ho,l
Very nice decision by Hon'ble Judje saheb for poor people living in the concerned 'Gram Panchyat', who is responsible for the same, 😂😂😂🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉
पहला जज देखा जो आँख पर पट्टी खोलकर भी केस की नब्ज समझ लेता है।
❤❤❤
Bahut vadia sir
Ek Sardarji aur ek Bangali MP ke daku ( khadi wale, bhagwa wale, hare jhande wale, khaki wale, kaale coat wale ) pe bhari !
Sometimes the judge can be wrong too.. the current behaviour of judge sahab is not right.. till 12:47
Lawyer could've been charged with contempt of court after not listening to the Judge after so many warnings!
Done fair decision for poor people thirstiness instead of contractor interest by Judge would be checked corruption in India
salute to you sir
All 'Repercussions' are also invited by Judge Saheb, very nice ❤❤❤😂😂😂🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉
❤
मेरा केस चंडीगढ हाईकोर्ट मे है एक बार 9 महीन की तारीख मिली थी उस के बाद पता ही नही 6 महीन हो गए क्या करू कोई रास्त बताए
Bahut he emandar hai ye Modi se to bahut he ache din aa jayenge meri request hai ji ye kon kon manta hai ki ye hona chahiye 🙏🙏🙏🙏
Bana Manso na kesh saBhava joy
Tank wali zamin pe inka kabza hai.
Jay shree ram
❤😅
Judge will not allow lawyer to. Open mouth .such supremacy
The lawyer had every opportunity to open his mouth when he submitted his written petition and therein said everything he wanted to say.Then in a mindless activity, when arguing, he opens his mouth to add to that by his own submission. Now... the Hon. Judge has to weigh in the submission in real time and make a decision, and when he does, the only reason counsel keeps butting in is, because he didn't think his words through, before speaking them, and the Hon. Judge saw through his his ruse and passed a judgement in the favour of the sufferers. That is not "supremacy", as you call it, instead, it can be called, "the wisdom of the court", of not allowing counsel to razzle-dazzle the court.
Lawyer was trying to be slick so gram panchayat is not summoned ..bhed khull jata😂
The lawyer himself did not disclose any ownership of the land in this small clip so judge's question and instruction is valid. I cannot say for sure what's happening but judge instruction based on the lawyers submission seems valid to me.