Photolithography: Step by step

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 1 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 169

  • @FATCACAK
    @FATCACAK 9 місяців тому +14

    I watched 10 videos before I could get this explained in a satisfactory way. Thank you sir. Absolutely fascinating

  • @salmaasa2243
    @salmaasa2243 3 роки тому +43

    You made this so easy and interesting! I have been stressed over this for the past hour and you cleared everything within 5 minutes! Thank you!

  • @Asianpersuasion3
    @Asianpersuasion3 8 років тому +122

    Great video! And I just have to say, 2:05 may be the most clever use of the "rotate" animation that I've ever seen :)

    • @firmman4505
      @firmman4505 5 років тому

      Brian Li lol

    • @tankhaishin7503
      @tankhaishin7503 3 роки тому +4

      hahah, ikr, the classic rotation animation of power point

    • @mubarakayinla
      @mubarakayinla 3 роки тому +1

      Exactlyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy

    • @maraganina
      @maraganina Рік тому

      Also the ONLY use of the rotate animation

  • @batesk52
    @batesk52 13 днів тому

    I never comment but this video is was so helpful for me, I'm brand new to my lab and seeing you actually walk through it finally made sense. Thank you so much for taking the time.

  • @mariaivashentseva3829
    @mariaivashentseva3829 8 років тому +356

    Can we just use a moment to appreciate how he managed to make such a boring topic a much more funny and entertaining? Thank you!

    • @paveldvorak5512
      @paveldvorak5512 8 років тому +74

      How the fuck is this boring?

    • @paveldvorak5512
      @paveldvorak5512 8 років тому +14

      If you know this stuff I guess it'd be boring but assuming you don't... How is this anything but fascinating?

    • @rousseau327
      @rousseau327 7 років тому

      Pavel, maybe he knows this stuff

    • @gabrielfriedel4754
      @gabrielfriedel4754 6 років тому

      and short too!

    • @NYD20
      @NYD20 5 років тому +1

      He just explains the proces of making wafer’s. And if you dont know what a wafer is.. its the father of microchips. One of those first steps of creating microchips. If i’m wrong, please comment !

  • @forgotaboutbre
    @forgotaboutbre 5 років тому +14

    drawing on stone with light ... AWESOME!!

  • @rogersantosprojects
    @rogersantosprojects Рік тому +1

    Finally, I saw a bunch of videos showing the steps of building a microchip, but none explained to me how a machine was able to manipulate these tiny objects, finally this one explained, with light and chemicals, not with "physical" parts!

  • @petteral94
    @petteral94 7 років тому +10

    Thank you from Norway! You just saved my grade!

  • @aquss33
    @aquss33 Рік тому +2

    To think that 14nm was the newest standard process just 7 years ago...

  • @behnamasid
    @behnamasid 6 років тому +15

    5:23 that's what she said

  • @Knightfire66
    @Knightfire66 2 роки тому +1

    5:00 its 5nm now I think

  • @lehw916
    @lehw916 7 років тому +7

    Well certainly size matters but 3D printing isn't going to solve Moore's Law issue (at least not permanently); circuit boards components are reaching atomic level.

  • @brunoscocozza7531
    @brunoscocozza7531 4 роки тому +8

    Brilliant video. So useful, so condensed, perfection.

  • @davianoinglesias5030
    @davianoinglesias5030 6 місяців тому

    This is the least covered topic on the internet, I'm glad I finally found this video. Subscribing

  • @docdhilipkumar
    @docdhilipkumar 16 днів тому

    I was totally confused when you said big Ben, thanks for the clarification

  • @honglangford9733
    @honglangford9733 3 роки тому +1

    @3:38, it should be "silicon dioxide that layers on top of the silicon layer" instead of "on top of the photoresist", right?

  • @CGGamingCo
    @CGGamingCo 26 днів тому

    Great video, finally I understand the entire process

  • @markfinn825
    @markfinn825 2 роки тому +1

    in 1984 and 1985 the company i did final assembly of semiconductor manufacturing equipment for, received processed wafers that had not passed QC to use as test wafers from customers that bought their products. With the developed wafers it could be seen that the circuitry was inside not on top of the wafer. The chemicals had penetrated wafer in each step. Nothing was on the wafer surface. Maybe like stained glass is not like painted glass. My guess is the glass is porous as far as glass stain is concerned. And wafers were porous as far as the chemicals used for them then,

  • @markfinn825
    @markfinn825 2 роки тому +1

    Semiconductor manufacturing equipment of the mid 1980s was used to spin the wafer as chemical streams or sprays were applied to create the layered images inside. Dopants altered the silica atomic structure to create N or P type properties that in the end left an electronic circuit inside a little square of glass called a fragment that was about the size of a square seen with 1/4 inch graph paper. Photoresist made possible the etching away of doped areas inside the thin glass like wafer. N and P type areas combined formed transistors in the maybe thousands or hundred or hundreds of thousands in tiny areas thanks to a microfiche mask used to expose the photoresist for the etching processes. Like one photograph negative sandwiched between two pieces of glass the mask was. But there were maybe about 200 little square identical images in each maybe 4 inch mask. Protected from contaminants and friction in between the two pieces of glass the film photograph negative was safe to use over and over. But special equipment was used to cleanse the mask to increase yield. Else too many of those little squares would be faulty and not an effective micro miniaturized circuit inside that black rectangular computer chip.

    • @IMpossible1987
      @IMpossible1987 11 місяців тому

      N using Boron (5 electron) were P using Phosphorus (3 electron) so electron can move around wafer atom (Si = 4 electron)

  • @movax20h
    @movax20h 5 років тому +6

    Ok. But how do you make a mask itself? It also has extremely small features to begin with.

    • @juaneer
      @juaneer 4 роки тому +4

      The point is that the optics used allow you to focus the light past the photo mask, meaning the mask itself doesn't have to be that small.

    • @cat-.-
      @cat-.- 3 роки тому

      Masks can be big, the light focuses after it passes the mask, so the images are small, like in a camera, a quarter inch cmos captures however wide and far a scene you like.

  • @kingXofXhell
    @kingXofXhell 6 років тому +11

    2:59 lol your wafer moved

  • @samiramammadova4942
    @samiramammadova4942 3 роки тому

    Great and great vıdeo !!! short and excellent explanatıon

  • @petef15
    @petef15 4 роки тому +3

    Thanks, now i know what i make at work.

  • @Time-cc2qb
    @Time-cc2qb 3 роки тому +1

    That size matters at the end had me

  • @christophermullins7163
    @christophermullins7163 3 роки тому +1

    Wouldn't is be a higher resolution rather than a lower resolution?

  • @Jennn
    @Jennn 2 роки тому +1

    Oh my goodness. I feel so silly that I am learning everything I am... And only realized today that thermal paste is made of silicone...

  • @zoer7105
    @zoer7105 7 років тому +5

    shorter wavelengths of light generate a higher resolution?? the shorter the wavelength the more precise the image... like you said they shortened the wavelength from 365nm to smaller wavelengths, to improve resolution. overall great concise and effective video though

    • @danarcese4248
      @danarcese4248 6 років тому +2

      Instead of R~λ/NA, R should be replaced with minimum feature size (CD) so CD~λ/NA so if the wavelength increases the minimum feature size increases and if the wavelength decreases ( frequency increases) and the minimum feature size decreases so smaller patterns can be put on the photoresist layer.

    • @mao5441
      @mao5441 6 років тому +1

      @@danarcese4248 conclusion the relationship between wavelength and resolution is?

    • @psun256
      @psun256 6 років тому

      @@danarcese4248 Waaaaaa?

    • @danarcese4248
      @danarcese4248 6 років тому

      @@mao5441 as wavelength increases resolution decreases

    • @danarcese4248
      @danarcese4248 6 років тому +1

      @@psun256 resolution and minimum feature size are inversely proportional. if your resolution increases (think a nice tv) then things aren't blurry and you can see more distinct objects even if they're smaller ( smaller min feature size)

  • @samjoshua192
    @samjoshua192 8 років тому +6

    how does etching not remove silicone on the sides during the chemical process

    • @tonipopa
      @tonipopa 4 роки тому +3

      the etching material wont react with the silicon.

    • @samjoshua192
      @samjoshua192 4 роки тому +2

      @@tonipopa wow a reply to a question I asked 3 years ago

    • @tonipopa
      @tonipopa 4 роки тому +2

      @@samjoshua192 yeah I watched the video and saw your question and thought I should reply 😋

    • @jamadir
      @jamadir 2 роки тому +1

      @@samjoshua192 i hope it helped

    • @matharuso9470
      @matharuso9470 3 місяці тому

      @@samjoshua192 lol

  • @carlosnyasowa1709
    @carlosnyasowa1709 4 роки тому +4

    Thanks alot Jae-Hwang Lee⁦♥️⁩⁦♥️⁩ Thumbs up!! You are great, shame to those disliking a video like this. Please continue to add more videos like this on the process of transistors/processor production. You the great⁦♥️⁩

  • @presidentiallsuite
    @presidentiallsuite 4 роки тому +1

    Very interesting and relative for today....🤔🏆

  • @asevarasto
    @asevarasto 4 роки тому +1

    That substrate in that visualization is the same thing as the silicone right? In MEMS technology it's all about the silicone. The substate is cut from silicone. And all etching is happening to that silicone substrate wafer. They're not different things. Correct me if i'm wrong

  • @cosanostra8341
    @cosanostra8341 3 роки тому

    Thank you very much for the video.
    Could you tell me what are the possible causes of stitching lines?
    why some lith machine macke stitching line during the lith process an other machines dont have this problem?
    thank you very much!!!!!

  • @harisha.g4792
    @harisha.g4792 8 років тому +3

    great video.....a thorough and a neat explanation!!!

  • @saad2kaka
    @saad2kaka 8 років тому

    Watched it second time and appreciating it more, you deserve something better than only Thank you. EXCELLENT!!!

  • @marcenara3260
    @marcenara3260 4 роки тому +1

    saved my life thank you

  • @slevinshafel9395
    @slevinshafel9395 2 роки тому

    can be made aerogel with photolitografy? or some kind of sponge where have nanometer bubles inside and thin walls.

  • @dwayneh3391
    @dwayneh3391 3 роки тому

    Silicone is a resistor, right? So making groves into the silicone by photolithography and/or etched away is the paths where electrons ie current would travel through? Would the electrons travel up and down from the grooves to the substrate or along the groves that were etched away?

    • @dwayneh3391
      @dwayneh3391 3 роки тому

      Or is the electrical paths added to the etched groves during the doping phase ?

    • @succulentus2771
      @succulentus2771 Рік тому

      Maybe I misunderstood you, but there's a difference between silicone (a resistor), and silicon (a semi conductor) which is used as the base for the microchips.

  • @ErossaanBooming
    @ErossaanBooming 3 роки тому

    very clear simple and interesting explantation

  • @rancosteel
    @rancosteel Рік тому

    How do they create the reticle?

  • @denebvegaaltair1146
    @denebvegaaltair1146 3 роки тому

    The silicon dioxide @3:28 can also be grown on top of the silicon right?

  • @skorakora
    @skorakora 3 роки тому

    I am really at wrong uni, my knowledge and interests are much above that uni tries to teach me.
    But what I could do, my country screwd up educational system so much that my only choice was some bad university

  • @willgalperin
    @willgalperin 3 місяці тому

    you crushed it! size matters lmaooo

  • @PARALLELPEOPLEAKSHAYB
    @PARALLELPEOPLEAKSHAYB 5 років тому +1

    Simple explenation , thanks...

  • @kalpeshwani8520
    @kalpeshwani8520 2 роки тому

    Is Non animated -- real video of same process explained available ??????

  • @ambarsingh4495
    @ambarsingh4495 6 років тому +2

    Great video. Thanks for making it easy and short.

  • @josephixtone3350
    @josephixtone3350 3 роки тому +2

    We are now at 3nm, just imagine

  • @rihanatechie
    @rihanatechie 2 роки тому

    Which book did you refer ??

  • @mohanadkhaled9969
    @mohanadkhaled9969 2 роки тому

    Thank you

  • @bhuvanpatle4523
    @bhuvanpatle4523 2 роки тому +1

    Size matters
    current 5nm

  • @mosab643
    @mosab643 4 роки тому +1

    Where would we be without chemistry?

  • @samjoshua192
    @samjoshua192 8 років тому

    how does etching not remove the silicone on the side and only the unprotected silicone @ 3.11

  • @loitfm720
    @loitfm720 2 роки тому

    thanks for sharing

  • @mao5441
    @mao5441 6 років тому

    4:38 shorter wavelength of light generate a lower resolution ?
    From that formula shown obviously the higher wavelength will produce better resolution.
    BTW it's a good explanation thanks.

    • @vibodhj349
      @vibodhj349 6 років тому +2

      You contradicted yourself! Check what you have written.

    • @klaasbernd
      @klaasbernd 5 років тому +3

      The formula is good. Resolution in this case is defined as feature size. Smaller feature size is better. Smaller wavelength means smaller feature size.

    • @burrybondz225
      @burrybondz225 2 роки тому +1

      @@vibodhj349 he didn't contradict himself. He was asking for a clarification because he assumed that he spotted a contradiction. The first sentence was him quoting the video; I'm guessing the lack of quotation marks confused you.

    • @saltysauce39
      @saltysauce39 9 місяців тому

      good question

  • @pindaanwale7517
    @pindaanwale7517 4 роки тому

    Thumbs Up And Hats Off For Guy. How he manage the so long and boring topic to look such an easy and interesting 👍♥
    Thanks Sir

  • @MdKawsarAhmed-k3e
    @MdKawsarAhmed-k3e 3 місяці тому

    nicely explained

  • @dafnekittendorf6719
    @dafnekittendorf6719 6 років тому

    Great video thanks

  • @luisrr3
    @luisrr3 8 років тому +2

    Best video out there.

  • @eddsardeen6829
    @eddsardeen6829 2 роки тому

    very clean and interesting explanation

  • @leealex24
    @leealex24 3 роки тому

    Question, do you have to keep putting "new" photoresist for each new layer?

  • @ARNAKLDO
    @ARNAKLDO 3 роки тому

    Are we aliens?!! I'm just amazed how peeps were able to come up with this amazing process.

  • @stdprocedure
    @stdprocedure 2 роки тому

    Please, any wise person to ask some questions? What "silicon" is exactly, i know there are p-type & n-type, this "silicon" is the opposite type of the substrate? How is a mask of one single transistor?

  • @bijoyroychowdhuryprinon6768
    @bijoyroychowdhuryprinon6768 2 роки тому

    Brilliant

  • @mehdimsari9608
    @mehdimsari9608 7 років тому

    Thanks a lot man, it helps me alot

  • @kewalofi8849
    @kewalofi8849 3 роки тому

    5:23 Conclusion "Size matters "

  • @greenlantern4127
    @greenlantern4127 5 років тому +2

    Very good video very informative but had to watch it on mute as instructed by faculty

  • @relskull3324
    @relskull3324 2 роки тому

    size matters👍

  • @ravianandrao7761
    @ravianandrao7761 8 років тому

    yes really helpful.. explicitly explained

  • @hrushihrushi8983
    @hrushihrushi8983 6 років тому

    what is the use of photoresist and why applying and removing?

    • @nodame1009
      @nodame1009 4 роки тому

      Photoresist is used To create pattern on wafers

  • @ravindrajoshi4111
    @ravindrajoshi4111 2 роки тому

    Interesting

  • @tridip66
    @tridip66 5 років тому +1

    Today we stand at 5nm with EUV

  • @ewangoddard7345
    @ewangoddard7345 2 роки тому

    very digestable, cheers

  • @skittlesli3258
    @skittlesli3258 8 років тому

    really useful.Thanks for sharing!

  • @OneBluePopcorn
    @OneBluePopcorn 2 роки тому

    Very concise.

  • @HeatherRogersMagic
    @HeatherRogersMagic 6 років тому

    Wow. Okay. I'm writing a comedy magic show for JSR Micro and this will help in creating the script. ... Silk through phone could be the cleaning process...

  • @b51navneethvislawath95
    @b51navneethvislawath95 2 роки тому

    "size matters" haha this guy is funny.

  • @akhila838
    @akhila838 6 років тому

    Lithography and photo lithography differences?

    • @psun256
      @psun256 6 років тому +2

      Lithography is a physical process (like printing press) and photolithography uses light to "print" it.

    • @akhila838
      @akhila838 6 років тому

      @@psun256 OK thanks 😇

    • @psun256
      @psun256 6 років тому +1

      @@akhila838 You're welcome!

  • @lukehill6272
    @lukehill6272 6 років тому

    Hopefully someone with the expertise and knowledge can help me here I cannot find my answers anywhere... I have been tasked to produce a power point on LED manufacturing and its requirement for vacuum. id be forever grateful for any the answers to any of these questions I've watched endless videos on UA-cam. Thanks in advance. The questions are:
    1)A wide variety of systems used in LED manufacture require a certain level of vacuum pressure, what is the necessity for vacuum in this environment?
    2) what are the various methods of achieving low and high vacuum pressure (pumps)
    3) what measurement systems are used to indicate the various ranges (gauges)

  • @saad2kaka
    @saad2kaka 8 років тому

    Thank you very much

  • @ritiittiii9344
    @ritiittiii9344 4 роки тому

    printing on stone with light not printing with light (photography)

  • @MikePeachMLVD
    @MikePeachMLVD 3 роки тому

    Alguien en 2021?

  • @wahajaijaz7690
    @wahajaijaz7690 11 місяців тому

    photolithograghy: Size matters!🤣

  • @aegon_targerian
    @aegon_targerian 2 роки тому

    size matters😁😁

  • @HiteshPatel-pn8xc
    @HiteshPatel-pn8xc 6 років тому

    Badhay nu joine aevu lage se ke jordar haseeeee.

  • @samspeaks2016
    @samspeaks2016 Рік тому

    At this rate I wouldn't even be surprised if this was all figured out and done in a night. And you'd think the first guy to milk a cow was out there. Who on earth figured this out..

  • @SammyGDude
    @SammyGDude Рік тому

    ending with size matters lol

  • @eightnoteight
    @eightnoteight Рік тому +2

    how a university project video in the end says "size matters"

  • @MatterStorm1
    @MatterStorm1 8 років тому

    and thus the entire digital dimension was made

  • @hepbitkin9854
    @hepbitkin9854 3 роки тому

    "Size matters" was a bit awkward though.

  • @siddharthkatiyar1990
    @siddharthkatiyar1990 7 років тому

    1:40, i think u meant SiO2

  • @fastfourier3
    @fastfourier3 Рік тому

    did you say SIZE MATTERS
    lol

  • @lemonade2473
    @lemonade2473 4 роки тому

    oh now I get it...

  • @vinaykumarhs5509
    @vinaykumarhs5509 3 роки тому +1

    "Size matters",🤣🤣🤣
    😳😶
    😭😭😭😭😭🤣

  • @luyang7033
    @luyang7033 7 років тому

    Love the Big Ben joke! 😂

  • @karthikkrishna5870
    @karthikkrishna5870 6 років тому +3

    Stop working on the size of chips .somone Start working on reducing the size of battery. Good video.

    • @vibodhj349
      @vibodhj349 6 років тому

      lol

    • @ImGoodThankYou
      @ImGoodThankYou 6 років тому

      I know right! F*** Moore and the microelectronics industry!

    • @reddragonflyxx657
      @reddragonflyxx657 6 років тому +3

      1. Smaller process nodes enable greater efficiency reducing the drain on batteries by electronics at a given performance level
      2. We may as well continue to use the lithography industry's developed R&D resources until quick progress ends. Otherwise we'll have to rebuild the labs later on when chips are revisited.
      3. Electrochemistry has very different problems, and there are no obvious improvements to be made on current technologies. Funding would go to basic (not applied) research and the chances of useful results would be extremely slim (not attractive to investors).
      4. We should still fund basic research more, it's where the most important technologies come from.
      5. We need better batteries, and current ones are terrible. There's quite a bit of money going into efforts to change that (both by reducing the need and improving the batteries).

    • @psun256
      @psun256 6 років тому +1

      Smaller process = less heat and lower power comsumption.
      If they work on making it smaller, you won't need a massive battery.

    • @nivekakninblarg8076
      @nivekakninblarg8076 3 роки тому

      It's made that way for planned obsolesce.

  • @hangchen7983
    @hangchen7983 6 років тому +1

    Size matters. Yea,

  • @timwulff649
    @timwulff649 6 років тому +1

    Size matters

  • @greencard6070
    @greencard6070 4 роки тому

    Based

  • @Hoiu1106
    @Hoiu1106 2 роки тому +1

    Who r seeing this in 2023?

  • @koenlaermans1963
    @koenlaermans1963 7 років тому

    jeeeesus christ u should be a rapper

  • @prashntapandey757
    @prashntapandey757 9 місяців тому

    @2024 chip size reached 3nm