Boeing 787 at cruising altitude over the Atlantic. Flight deck view!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 6 січ 2017
  • Awesome short video shared by a colleague who wishes to remain nameless.
    Two other widebodies in front and below while cruising in the North Atlantic tracks.
  • Авто та транспорт

КОМЕНТАРІ • 250

  • @evasragova8335
    @evasragova8335 2 роки тому +212

    I wish this was longer. I could watch it forever.

    • @dragonsword7370
      @dragonsword7370 Рік тому +8

      Make it into a gif or just loop it into a long form video. Hope that helps.

    • @yikebendan
      @yikebendan 2 місяці тому +4

      I played Microsoft Flight Simulator to mimic this kind of experience.

  • @therealchucktaylor3392
    @therealchucktaylor3392 Рік тому +4

    Breath taking !

  • @Simmerdownunder
    @Simmerdownunder 2 роки тому +124

    I love the aircraft separation, lower altitudes lead so there's no wake turbulence from the higher aircraft. Soo Cool. =)

    • @jimmymcjimmyvich9052
      @jimmymcjimmyvich9052 2 роки тому +2

      Surely they don't all agree not to pass each other

    • @MarcusNesbitt4
      @MarcusNesbitt4 2 роки тому +10

      They are all going at about the same speed when cruising so it would be hard for one to overtake another

    • @jimmymcjimmyvich9052
      @jimmymcjimmyvich9052 2 роки тому +1

      @@MarcusNesbitt4 'About' I see.

    • @bigdogboos1
      @bigdogboos1 2 роки тому +8

      dude that's not the reason at all lol

    • @alinaqirizvi1441
      @alinaqirizvi1441 Рік тому +1

      There are rules for flying including separation distance so aircraft don't risk colliding or getting extreme turbulence from the planes in front of them

  • @DanDownunda8888
    @DanDownunda8888 Місяць тому +4

    I've driven through Monument Valley in Arizona and the huge buttes and mesas rising from the desert in the late afternoon are spectacular, orange, red, pale browns and yellows as far as you could see. It was the most spectacular thing I'd ever seen. 20 years later I was flying across the Pacific, heading east at about the same time of day and the clouds looked just like giant mesas for hundreds of miles. I don't know the technical terms, but we were miles above the 'normal' cloud cover and thrusting above that cloud cover were monstruous buttes that made it look like an alien landscape. It was the most joyous, wonderful thing that I have seen in the natural world. I really hope that there is a Heaven, because I'd want to look down on that forever :)

  • @Marcfyve24
    @Marcfyve24 2 роки тому +10

    Maaaaaaaan, do I miss that view from that high up!!!!

  • @marcelnowakowski945
    @marcelnowakowski945 2 місяці тому +2

    Outstanding!

  • @syedtanvirali8644
    @syedtanvirali8644 2 місяці тому +3

    Majestic ❤

  • @maulanwong3841
    @maulanwong3841 5 років тому +251

    Alot of people are afraid of flying over oceans espically at night but i love flying and i want to be a pilot

    • @Eezkiel
      @Eezkiel 4 роки тому +8

      Same

    • @ryancarletta5073
      @ryancarletta5073 3 роки тому +12

      You pilot, im ATC, come on Japan or indonesian later 🤣

    • @afk933
      @afk933 2 роки тому +2

      Same which airline??

    • @askhowiknow5527
      @askhowiknow5527 2 роки тому +6

      I love being in the sky. I’m also an anxiety-ridden neurotic freak so it seems unnatural.

    • @amire6036
      @amire6036 2 роки тому +3

      Hope u succeed

  • @FreddyNL
    @FreddyNL 2 місяці тому

    This looks stunning

  • @FlyingNL
    @FlyingNL Місяць тому

    Stunning! 😍

  • @benonland
    @benonland 2 роки тому +1

    This should've already gone viral by now!

  • @maksatamanov2461
    @maksatamanov2461 Місяць тому

    stunning

  • @narekvoskanyan2248
    @narekvoskanyan2248 Рік тому

    It is amazing picture

  • @LoganathRaja
    @LoganathRaja Місяць тому

    Being a Pilot is a Honor and good pay and good food and decent life,... unless you met with an accident becoz of equipment failure.. Love this video flying over Atlantic...

  • @powerdollkirby
    @powerdollkirby 7 місяців тому

    amazing

  • @dogwithwigwamz.7320
    @dogwithwigwamz.7320 Місяць тому +1

    In my first time fling in a passenger jet, between London and Rome, we were a few thousand feet above the `Channel when I noticed - some thousands of feet below - another plane going in the exact opposite direction, and it appeared to be going at one hell of a speed. Our speed added to its.....

  • @MonthlyFails
    @MonthlyFails 2 роки тому +6

    Hello Globetrekker Aviation, is it possible to contact you regarding this video (i.e. via email)? We would be interested to discuss a license to use this video if this is generally possible to discuss? :) Cheers, Felix

  • @GeorgeCatcher
    @GeorgeCatcher 2 місяці тому +2

    You see the feature of Boeing's aerodynamics here. When contrail occur, boing's contrails are spread by two lines, and stays like that for a long time. While Airbuses contrails mix to a wide single line right after airplane.

    • @tungstencarbide7255
      @tungstencarbide7255 Місяць тому

      Interesting.
      Do you happen to know why?

    • @GeorgeCatcher
      @GeorgeCatcher Місяць тому +1

      @@tungstencarbide7255 No, unfortunately I don't. It just an observation I made a long time ago... my guessing here it maybe connected to aerodynamic or even different wing concepts.
      All Boeings has light and thin wings, and it feels better on cruise but work a bit worse on takeoffs and landings and requires additional flaperon there. While Airbus has a more massive wings, working great on takeoffs and landings but a bit worse on cruise.

  • @amire6036
    @amire6036 2 роки тому +67

    You know your living your life until your remember “Oh, I’m above the clouds”

    • @Mthammere2010
      @Mthammere2010 2 місяці тому +3

      You mean above the clouds that are above the other clouds.

    • @2whl4re
      @2whl4re 26 днів тому

      And then you're not living you life?
      This might be a contender for the dumbest thing I've ever read.

  • @lucaas
    @lucaas 2 місяці тому +3

    Awesome catch! Would you be okay with me featuring this in my series Weekly Dose of Aviation? Of course you will be credited both in the video and in the description. Thanks!

    • @GlobetrekkerYYC
      @GlobetrekkerYYC  2 місяці тому

      Yes go ahead. I don't mind at all!

    • @stanleymakafui
      @stanleymakafui Місяць тому

      ​@@GlobetrekkerYYCthanks for providing stuff like this for free

  • @3MinutesofAviation
    @3MinutesofAviation Рік тому +20

    Cool capture! May I feature this clip in one of my next episodes? Of course with a link back to your original video. Cheers!

    • @GlobetrekkerYYC
      @GlobetrekkerYYC  Рік тому +6

      Yes go right ahead! 👍

    • @stanleymakafui
      @stanleymakafui Місяць тому

      And I'm going straight to watch your video

    • @Romelio007
      @Romelio007 27 днів тому

      Under what category? Your videos seem to be more of the "Seconds from disaster" type.

  • @bendenisereedy7865
    @bendenisereedy7865 Місяць тому

    Here in western Scotland we point at planes then check Flight radar.... we see many from European cities to exotic-sounding destinations. KLM, AF, heading to Seattle and other places we'd love to visit.

    • @IlyaSamoylenko
      @IlyaSamoylenko Місяць тому

      I have the same habit. I live in Oshawa, Canada and oftentimes check Flight radar when I hear a plane passing by my town (just 50 km east of Toronto). They are just gaining altitude right above me

    • @Woodburner100
      @Woodburner100 14 днів тому

      I’m relieved…I thought it was just me who did that. Greetings from northern Canada!

  • @lh1678
    @lh1678 Місяць тому

    Reminds me of going to the UK/Paris.

  • @jeffreymorris11
    @jeffreymorris11 2 місяці тому +23

    Ponder on this! 100 years ago, what we witness in this video was impossible!
    The aviation innovation is staggering!

    • @dustyflair
      @dustyflair 2 місяці тому +1

      100 years ago they did have passenger planes.

    • @jeffreymorris11
      @jeffreymorris11 2 місяці тому +1

      @@dustyflair
      Thank you, I seem not to realize the past is so near to here and now, yet so amazing what was achieved.
      Thank you again.
      I am of the past and the future.

    • @dustyflair
      @dustyflair 2 місяці тому

      My grandfather flew the SBD Dauntless (which was a basicly a tin can) in WWII and I often wonder what he would think of a modern jet.@@jeffreymorris11

  • @oljekwalter
    @oljekwalter 2 місяці тому

    Nice ☺️☺️👍👍

  • @kingcarisma
    @kingcarisma 2 роки тому

    Ok this is nice

  • @mrglide7078
    @mrglide7078 2 місяці тому +5

    All that cubic mileage over the Atlantic, and three planes have to fly almost above each other by a few thousand feet 😂

    • @tjr4459
      @tjr4459 Місяць тому +2

      You’re not seeing the hundreds of other planes flying nearby. Planes are assigned specific routes to fly for safety reasons.

  • @christopherwillis5014
    @christopherwillis5014 Рік тому

    That's cool. Can't wait To go to paris

  • @newelllondon724
    @newelllondon724 Місяць тому

    Brings back memories of flying to Paris via Northern Ireland and Scotland and astride of the former British Empire anchorage at Scapa Flow
    Sitting in First Class on the correct side the former anchorage still holds the scuttled German Empire fleet from WW1. Too bad that wasn’t visible

  • @joysboy6588
    @joysboy6588 2 місяці тому +2

    Would just like to.share a different perceptive from an unforgettable personal experience:
    Been in a yacht race across the Atlantic (Laa Palamas to St Lucia - the A.R.C). It freaked me out to know that while below & battling against mother nature (please note day & night) & in the middle of the ocean, one of the signs you know you're NOW close to land is when you hear the sound of aircraft engines OR start to see birds. Point being, those below would have NEVER seen or heard that.
    I might as well out it out there: our first indication we were eventually close to land, was when we sailed past Martinique & saw orange street lights (in the dead of night) & from afar, starboard......
    PS: great upload.

  • @AviationLock
    @AviationLock Місяць тому

    So this is what it looks like when I go on flight radar and see two planes really close to each other in the air

  • @muhammadfaridsuryautama319
    @muhammadfaridsuryautama319 2 роки тому +1

    You are from Canada? And flying with Air Canada?

  • @MathaGoram
    @MathaGoram 2 місяці тому

    Clear example of the new NAT rules in action, except for the randomization of the horizontal separation to the right. Of course, the latter may still be at work but my knowledge in these matters is barely above pre-K level. Thanks for sharing!

    • @MarkAthas
      @MarkAthas Місяць тому +1

      The fact that you know the term NAT(s) and horizontal separation indicates your knowledge is higher than pre-K. Gander and Shannon are the two non radar centers that plan most of the N Atlantic tracks each day, considering the jet stream and issuing non radar, altitude crossing restrictions in some cases. I'm retired FAA ATC, started my career at Lajes Rapcon (USAF) in the Azores. We worked with Santa Maria non radar center, the facility that controls airspace south and west of Shannon's. They called me once to separate two airplanes in their airspace, one of which wanted to change altitude, but they were too close for non radar procedures. So he switched both AC to my freq, I radar IDed both of them with the ident function, verified their altitudes, issued a traffic call to each AC, and then gave the one AC the climb it was requesting. It probably wasn't legal for me to do that, but it was the mid 80s, a different era.

    • @MathaGoram
      @MathaGoram Місяць тому +1

      @@MarkAthas Thanks for sharing. Appreciate the information. Very fascinating that most of the work is in 2D with implicit understanding of 3D impact of their decisions. I always admire how ATC vectors emergency aircraft with such cool head(s). Regards. Azores must have been a wonderful experience.

    • @MarkAthas
      @MarkAthas Місяць тому +1

      @@MathaGoram you framed it well. When I encounter potential new ATC hires, that's the first question I ask: can you think three dimensionally on a 2D display. The Azores are paradise in the Summer months and have considered visiting again.

  • @legoworks-cg5hk
    @legoworks-cg5hk 2 місяці тому

    You can really see how fast and high up it is

  • @zichaocai6962
    @zichaocai6962 2 роки тому

    没错,非常酷。导航也非常准

  • @adriannagamble2718
    @adriannagamble2718 6 місяців тому +13

    im a nervous flyer but man are planes incredible…

  • @joe18425
    @joe18425 2 роки тому +9

    So is this what they call a fight path ?

    • @Kaktus965
      @Kaktus965 11 місяців тому

      No

    • @agamemnon7461
      @agamemnon7461 Місяць тому

      That's called jet airway or jet route. They are on the same jet airway, different flight level

  • @larrybaker5316
    @larrybaker5316 4 місяці тому +1

    wow, that is cool! any pilots out there, does this happen very often?

    • @Herbie11
      @Herbie11 3 місяці тому

      Great question! Hope someone answers you.

  • @Metalfan757
    @Metalfan757 Місяць тому +1

    Who else had this randomly suggested to them?

  • @LoganathRaja
    @LoganathRaja Місяць тому

    Is there more chance for a crossing flight hitting any of the 3 or fly in between.. ?

  • @fredericsupercycle4136
    @fredericsupercycle4136 2 місяці тому

    how much of altitude between those planes? 1000 feet?

  • @shaxbozabulov-sn7dh
    @shaxbozabulov-sn7dh Місяць тому

    Wooooow😮

  • @DallasSniper
    @DallasSniper 3 місяці тому

    Anyone know the different altitude levels of each plane?

    • @paulramsingh9288
      @paulramsingh9288 2 місяці тому

      Between 28,000FT and 60,000FT, separation is 1,000FT which is what we see here.

  • @verstappa
    @verstappa Місяць тому

    This is, why we need different flight levels.

  • @tonyc1167
    @tonyc1167 2 роки тому

    these aircrafts all flying to the same airport?

    • @polle8657
      @polle8657 2 роки тому

      No, but probably together over the atlantic.

  • @rokaxiv
    @rokaxiv 2 роки тому +6

    what's the go with 3 aircrafts being so close to each other

    • @johnhammond6423
      @johnhammond6423 2 роки тому +5

      They are separated by 1,000 ft. This is normal procedure and monitored by the A.T.C.

    • @rokaxiv
      @rokaxiv 2 роки тому

      @@johnhammond6423 interesting, thank you

    • @anonymous9843
      @anonymous9843 Рік тому +1

      @@rokaxiv and also if they somehow are closer than 1000ft due to any reason the tcas system will notify the pilots and given instructions to both the pilots by having one desend and other climb

  • @Jim-nt7xy
    @Jim-nt7xy 2 місяці тому

    Is this typical?

  • @gregorystafford1411
    @gregorystafford1411 4 роки тому +6

    500,000 Hours of this on all Global Mainstream TV each week may help Humanity see Nature more Clearly I'd say.
    Many thanks for these 'Visions'....in Mean times long live Fair Use Drones & mainstream Open source Natural entertainments. Celebrity Lite goodness.

  • @AsaWRLD47
    @AsaWRLD47 Рік тому +1

    Is this what airlines do when going over oceans? Travel is groups or is this just a one off type of thing?

    • @srinitaaigaura
      @srinitaaigaura Рік тому

      See flightradar 24.

    • @AsaWRLD47
      @AsaWRLD47 Рік тому

      @@srinitaaigaura Thanks man!

    • @Herbie11
      @Herbie11 3 місяці тому +3

      It's so if one airplane has trouble, the passengers can hop into the other one.

  • @wim140
    @wim140 Рік тому +7

    This video is one hour too short

  • @mode1charlie170
    @mode1charlie170 2 місяці тому

    What altitude

  • @SaraiMartinez-du9nb
    @SaraiMartinez-du9nb Місяць тому

    ❤❤❤❤alt control esc 😮😮😮😮

  • @nzt_videos4271
    @nzt_videos4271 Місяць тому

    that would have looked epic on Flight Radar 24 ....

  • @Bob31415
    @Bob31415 Місяць тому

    Absolutely terrifying. I cannot even imagine doing that for a living. Imagine being home in the afternoon knowing that night you are going to be 35,000ft over the cold waters of the Atlantic Ocean in a metal tube. And as a pilot to do that multiple times a week. I'd much rather be home in my safe bed. But somebody has to do it and I have mad respect for all the flight crews who do. 👍👍

    • @904jagzsuck5
      @904jagzsuck5 День тому

      You never leave your house do you sheesh dude

  • @user-is2vy7ou4d
    @user-is2vy7ou4d Місяць тому

    Curvature on the horizon

  • @reinhardtmaximillianlutzow6934
    @reinhardtmaximillianlutzow6934 6 років тому +22

    There's the curve!!

    • @chrisbrommie
      @chrisbrommie 5 років тому +7

      But the flat earthers will say that is because of the fish eye camera lens ! 😂

    • @derekwall200
      @derekwall200 5 років тому +1

      yep, all those earth is flat people can shut the hell up. i swear if i hear another person say that shit i am going to cut out their own intestines and strangle them with it

    • @sherbangash6523
      @sherbangash6523 5 років тому

      @@derekwall200 better do it quick, for winter is coming.

    • @derekwall200
      @derekwall200 5 років тому

      @@sherbangash6523 i believe winter is already here in south Dakota. we had about 1/4 inch of snowfall here today

    • @sherbangash6523
      @sherbangash6523 5 років тому

      @@derekwall200 Yes, I am afraid the winter is here... let the watch begin.

  • @derekwall200
    @derekwall200 5 років тому +18

    how much altitude separates the 2 in front of this plane?

    • @zaiivonhest
      @zaiivonhest 5 років тому +3

      2000 feet

    • @derekwall200
      @derekwall200 5 років тому +1

      @@zaiivonhest wow they look closer than 2000 feet apart. i guess its because of the size of the jet in front

    • @ericlanegen
      @ericlanegen 5 років тому +4

      @@derekwall200 well that's not even 1/2 a mile so it isn't really that far. If that was horizontal distance, it would be a problem. However, since aircraft don't climb and descend like rocks and rockets, the vertical separation is perfectly acceptable.

    • @derekwall200
      @derekwall200 5 років тому

      @@ericlanegen any issues with wake turbulence at that speed?

    • @ericlanegen
      @ericlanegen 5 років тому +2

      Derek Wall wake turbulence is worse when you are are slower then when you are faster.

  • @nasipkismet2436
    @nasipkismet2436 4 дні тому

    Where is the water ??

  • @pennydreadful5217
    @pennydreadful5217 2 місяці тому

    A strangely calming video, all too short

  • @mybluebelly
    @mybluebelly 5 днів тому

    They say the first transatlantic flight was in june 1919 with a british twin engined Vimy bomber flying from St.Johns NFL to Clifden, Ireland. Wonder how that aircraft got there in the first place, lol.

  • @moviecentre6514
    @moviecentre6514 Рік тому

    Wow, this footage is amazing! Can I use it in a video I'm putting together? I'll make sure to credit you in the description.

  • @Mike44460
    @Mike44460 Місяць тому

    The flash on the left was a Concord leaving these guys in the dust. I'm joking.......

  • @escanor4006
    @escanor4006 7 місяців тому +1

    That may close but the clearance difference looks like 10,000ft

    • @maxeddw
      @maxeddw 5 місяців тому

      It isn't.

    • @escanor4006
      @escanor4006 4 місяці тому

      @@maxeddw what do you think the RVSM altitude of this?

  • @michaeltucker7608
    @michaeltucker7608 2 місяці тому

    You'd think they would spread out horizontally more to maximize the area covered by the chemtrail.

    • @royeb63
      @royeb63 Місяць тому

      LOL

    • @nadieequis710
      @nadieequis710 28 днів тому

      Chemtrailing the ocean? why? It's enough with the microplastics

    • @904jagzsuck5
      @904jagzsuck5 День тому

      😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂I just literally posted about to you nitwits

  • @trstquint7114
    @trstquint7114 2 місяці тому

    Two ' low ' emissions airplanes. Awesome...

    • @nicolas2112
      @nicolas2112 2 місяці тому

      What you actually SEE is water, though! 😀

  • @Dr.KurtAffair
    @Dr.KurtAffair Місяць тому +11

    These aircraft fly like this in case one develops trouble and they can then transfer the passengers across to the other plane via a long cable with a cage seat attached.

    • @gorefest3000
      @gorefest3000 Місяць тому +1

      Yes, and they charge you for it. Only cash is accepted. Before COVID the charge was some USD 20,00 per passenger, but now (2024) the minimum is USD 55,00. It is a real shame considering your only alternative is crashing down with the plane.
      Not to mention that you do not get a seat in the new plane, you have to stand all the way to your new destination.

    • @Fahad-rm1im
      @Fahad-rm1im Місяць тому +1

      😂😂😂

    • @MrGilRoland
      @MrGilRoland Місяць тому

      I was wondering why the close formation. Thanks for the explanation 🙏

    • @RelaxingMusic-gp3st
      @RelaxingMusic-gp3st 26 днів тому

      Duh! 🤭

  • @Dan.d649
    @Dan.d649 Рік тому

    The 787 Dreamliner, and the 777 both travel pretty fast at cruising altitude speeds. A 787 overtook an A340-600, at FL410, and 390 respectively. A 747-400 also overtook an A380 at FL400. It seems like Boeing wide-body airplanes are faster then Airbus.

    • @srinitaaigaura
      @srinitaaigaura Рік тому +1

      The 747 is a fast cruiser. That wing sweep was designed for an above average cruise speed.

    • @Dan.d649
      @Dan.d649 Рік тому +1

      @@srinitaaigaura That's why the 747 is an amazing airplane. The 777, and 787 wing designs were actually "rubbed off" from the 747's. The Boeing technology is far more superior than Airbus altogether.

    • @srinitaaigaura
      @srinitaaigaura Рік тому +1

      @@Dan.d649 A380 is fast, it cruises faster than almost anything bar the A350 and maybe 787. Check flight radar 24. Airplanes cruise not at the fastest speed they can, but the speed at which they are most fuel efficient. If you catch a powerful jet stream from behind, a few jets can even go supersonic relative to the ground.

    • @Dan.d649
      @Dan.d649 Рік тому +2

      @@srinitaaigaura This is true. However, the Engine Alliance GP-7000 turbofans of the A380, prove their worth of velocity, and also the Rolls Royce Trent 900s that power other A380s. But you need to understand that the Boeing 747, and how it's built, it is the fastest commercial airplane ever built. The wings of any 747 have more of a "sweep" to them, creating higher speed travel. The airplane also has powerful engines too. The 787, and 777 are fast too.

    • @Kaktus965
      @Kaktus965 11 місяців тому

      Pretty anecdotal evidence there, don’t you think? I mean a Honda Civic has at one time or another passed an exotic supercar. Is the Civic faster?

  • @sc882tt
    @sc882tt 5 років тому +1

    what fl you guys at ?

  • @80KG_Costco_Chicken
    @80KG_Costco_Chicken 2 місяці тому

    Lets try air drop the video to the other aircrafts 😀

  • @MMMWMMMMMMWMMMMWMMMMWM
    @MMMWMMMMMMWMMMMWMMMMWM Місяць тому

    That is beautiful but just looking at this makes me nauseous

  • @markmark2080
    @markmark2080 2 місяці тому

    It's a close race, still to early to call...

  • @ogermoger4099
    @ogermoger4099 2 роки тому +4

    chemtrails, 2012 and more

  • @gnihtyreve
    @gnihtyreve 10 днів тому

    this is lucky your captain save more fuel than the two below

  • @tomgreen1ball
    @tomgreen1ball 9 днів тому

    Wow. Look at the curve of the horizon. Pretty sure you’re using camera tricks. 😂

  • @Herbie11
    @Herbie11 3 місяці тому

    All the chemtrail dorks are scratching their heads.

  • @bwills3876
    @bwills3876 2 місяці тому

    Rush hour traffic.

  • @OHFORPEATSAKES
    @OHFORPEATSAKES 2 місяці тому

    CHEMTRAILS!!!!!!!
    (I'm kidding. Cool vid.)

  • @Estbels
    @Estbels Місяць тому

    Pumping out the chemtrails

  • @poklianon8453
    @poklianon8453 2 роки тому

    Horizon is already a bit curved

    • @johnhammond6423
      @johnhammond6423 2 роки тому

      Nope, you can't see the curvature of the earth at this altitude.

    • @user-cn3zq2zu2o
      @user-cn3zq2zu2o 2 роки тому +1

      @@johnhammond6423 or any altitude

    • @johnhammond6423
      @johnhammond6423 2 роки тому

      @@user-cn3zq2zu2o
      I talked to a pilot of an SR71 at an airshow a few years ago and he told me you could clearly see the curvature above 75,000 ft.

    • @user-cn3zq2zu2o
      @user-cn3zq2zu2o 2 роки тому

      @@johnhammond6423 Thanks for that. I should have put a smile emoji after my comment as I was having a dig at the flat earthers.

    • @Reformsqua
      @Reformsqua Рік тому

      @@johnhammond6423 Just read in applied optics that it can be seen on a clear cloudless horizon at 35,000 ft, provided you have at least 60 deg viewing angle (Lynch 2008)

  • @kurtdewittphoto
    @kurtdewittphoto 2 роки тому +5

    LoOk aT tHoSe ChEmTrAiLs!!!

    • @vincentsouchaud6717
      @vincentsouchaud6717 2 роки тому +4

      Exactly!

    • @jetstream454
      @jetstream454 Рік тому +1

      @@vincentsouchaud6717 They're not

    • @vincentsouchaud6717
      @vincentsouchaud6717 Рік тому +1

      @@jetstream454 Yes they are.

    • @Trance-2010
      @Trance-2010 Місяць тому

      @kurtdewittphoto
      Why are all you people so boring af??
      Everybody talking the same BS, over and over again.
      Is this everything that goes around in your heads?
      Talking the same crap, since ages.
      Why don't you just keep your mouth shut, and do not waste your and other people's time, with typing the same bs every time??
      Your life must be so boring.
      🤮🤮🤮

    • @nadieequis710
      @nadieequis710 28 днів тому

      ​@@vincentsouchaud6717chemtrails of CO2, yes

  • @aayazahmed5389
    @aayazahmed5389 24 дні тому

    3 planes

  • @EZ8E
    @EZ8E 2 місяці тому

    I cant believe I made it through 50 comments without the word "Chemtrail" Are those versions of humans dying off?

  • @K12SXXFire
    @K12SXXFire 28 днів тому +1

    Just look at them there chemtrails!!! ;)

  • @merxellus1456
    @merxellus1456 2 місяці тому +1

    Crazy how these things flies at around 1km per sec yet looks stationary….

    • @MsTob
      @MsTob 2 місяці тому

      more like 0.25km/s

  • @user-ck5vr5bu9d
    @user-ck5vr5bu9d 2 місяці тому

    😅😅😮😮😢🎉😂😂❤❤❤good

  • @flyaber
    @flyaber Місяць тому

    sadly the passengers did have this view, 🤣

  • @ikeshavthakral
    @ikeshavthakral Рік тому

    TCAS malfunction

    • @titan9259
      @titan9259 Рік тому

      1000ft separation was followed

  • @bikestailer7430
    @bikestailer7430 7 років тому +3

    the TCAS must be going Nuts.!

    • @metalcreatures3039
      @metalcreatures3039 5 років тому +2

      Um, no. An RA would never be issued if there was no intrusion into the flight path.

    • @Nico9472_
      @Nico9472_ Рік тому +1

      Nope. The way those 3 planes are flying is actually standard.

  • @mmikuw
    @mmikuw 2 місяці тому

    They are lucky it didnt explode. its boeing after all

  • @vincentsouchaud6717
    @vincentsouchaud6717 2 роки тому +6

    Daily geoengineering in full swing.

    • @vincentsouchaud6717
      @vincentsouchaud6717 Рік тому

      @@AR-ym4zh Really? How much time have you spent observing and doing your research, Einstein?

  • @FamiliarAnomaly
    @FamiliarAnomaly 2 місяці тому

    think i'll take a boat instead, safer

  • @Immenreiner
    @Immenreiner Місяць тому +1

    #chemtrails 😂

  • @Simon-fr4ts
    @Simon-fr4ts 2 місяці тому

    Why do Americans say 'cool, dude and awesome' so much? What do they actually mean? I hate those words personally.

    • @RamSingh-cg2dn
      @RamSingh-cg2dn 2 місяці тому

      U also forgot to mention "oh my god" especially when American women with high pitch voices say it

    • @texasrebel7754
      @texasrebel7754 Місяць тому

      Because most Americans have the language skills of a 10 year old kid.'
      Another one that drives me nuts is the constant use of "like."

  • @user-ro1is1us7z
    @user-ro1is1us7z 9 днів тому

    B767 with 4 engines 😂

  • @luisorosco717
    @luisorosco717 Рік тому

    Flat earth believers hate this one

  • @ongyekron777
    @ongyekron777 Місяць тому +2

    Spray em chemtrails

  • @natelove187
    @natelove187 6 років тому +7

    Chemtrailing over the Atlantic

    • @zoranpeta-velin2050
      @zoranpeta-velin2050 5 років тому +14

      @Eugen Actually is a combination of atmospheric conditions, engine exhaust and altitude. In short, the hot air from the engine exhaust forms that trails at high altitude, low temps. Like a car exhaust in cold weather.

    • @aerodaan
      @aerodaan 2 роки тому +5

      @@zoranpeta-velin2050 I can't believe you fell for it 🤣

    • @blitzy3244
      @blitzy3244 2 роки тому +1

      xD

    • @vincentsouchaud6717
      @vincentsouchaud6717 2 роки тому +1

      Exactly!

    • @vincentsouchaud6717
      @vincentsouchaud6717 2 роки тому +1

      @@zoranpeta-velin2050Time to warch Frankenskies on Odysee.

  • @MonthlyFailsVideoResearch
    @MonthlyFailsVideoResearch Рік тому

    Hey Globetrekker Aviation, do you have an email address at which we could contact you regarding this video? We would be interested to discuss a license to use this video if this is generally possible? (i.e. via email) 🙂 Cheers, Felix

  • @Kaktus965
    @Kaktus965 11 місяців тому +1

    Somebody needs to SLOP!

  • @904jagzsuck5
    @904jagzsuck5 День тому

    Hey look it's jet fuel exhaust aka 'cloud seeding' to the conspiracy wackos 😂