Great video, you are maxing out Archicad's modeling capabilities here... :-) are there any parts that could have been done more easily using the Rhino-Grasshopper connection?
Thanks it was really helpful. I would say this is one of the best archicad modeling videos there is, though I would use something else like Blender Cycles or Redshift for the final render and would also try to fix the jagged arcs. I am myself having problem with archicad with complex profile arc resolution, any tips ? I want it to have smooth shading in length, but hard arc lines - as if made from slabs. My known ways are: 1. Changing magic wand settings by switching from "best match" to "linear segments along circles" with bigger number (50-300 depends on size and viewing distance from the object), but the file gets heavy and the model will have horizontal lines over the length..f.e. a pipe will have lines over it's longer axis.. so it starts to look messy.. and even after converting it to morph and making the lines hidden it won't have side lines shown then and the object sides won't be smooth. 2. (better method) Staying with "best match" but making every object at least x10-50 times bigger than you need (in complex profile window).. then, converting everything to morph and only then resizing to correct size.. This makes it look a lot better and smooth, because doing it this way only the profile gets more detailed, but the side stays smooth, but it is very counter-intuitive.
When did the Word who became Immanuel(God with us) become the only begotten Son? This can only be at the immaculate conception/incarnation. And it is at this exact time when that part of Elohim which stayed in heaven takes on the tile of the Father. Elohim does not use these titles before that in the Bible (as far as I know). God[Elohim] has always existed as One God that **share** one and the same Holy Spirit. "And God[Elohim] said , Let *us* make man in *our* image, after *our* likeness: "... And they did! This is clearly Elohim speaking amongst themselves, and they are more than one. But it is impossible that they are (3) Persons - by my (perhaps out of date) definition. Only humans are people, and only people can be persons. God the Father and the Holy Spirit are not humans, not people, and therefore not Persons. Spare me the argument that they are persons because they have personality. My dog has a personality - he is not a person, he is not a human, and therefore not a person. Only the Word became flesh and dwelt among us as a man - and is a person. It may be of interest to some of you to learn that per older dictionaries, the word Person did not have an expanded definition that would include deity, as the new ones do. webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/Person Most of the books I read are at least 100 years old and the writers of those books were not using the same definition of Persons as the Seventh-day Adventist Trinitarians are using. I don't like to even use the work Trinitarian for two reasons: (1) it's a loaded, subjective, and controversial word these days. (2) it is not an essential word to describe who and what God[Elohim] is. Triad, Trinity, Triune... these words are not completely wrong, but not completely accurate either when talking about the Father, Son, and the Holy Ghost *which they share.* Biblically speaking, that is not (3) individual "Persons", and that is why the word Trinity is not legitimate, for the three aspects of what God[Elohim] is. John 5:7 "For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one." Yes. Of course. This is who and what God[Elohim] is and always will be. But that in no way makes them (3) individual Persons. God and the Holy Ghost are not humans - which is what you are so desperately trying to establish by the use of the word Trinity. The poetic lyrics of a lovely hymn are not the basis for sound theology. "God in three Persons blessed Trinity" was not in your grandmothers Christ in Song hymnal, or in your parents 1940's Church Hymnal. That 4th verse was added back into the SDA Hymnal in 1985. Why? And by who? www.truthseeker.church/church-hymnal-changes All of this debate evaporates if you *stop saying the God is (3) persons* "because they have personality." That is a pathetic argument. My dog has a personality! It does not make him a Person. There is no good reason do diminish God Almighty even in your mind to be a Person. The God Head of the Bible is (per their current titles) Father, Son, and the Holy Spirit - which they have always shared, and always will. Just my thoughts on the matter. I am open to other views if they are Biblical.
This was so interesting to watch! Thank you so much for sharing this!
Sper, díky😄
Thanks for sharing
Incredible!!!!!! 10!!!!!!! Top top top!!!
You Genius dude satisfied your designn
Thanks for the video
that's AMAZING
jesus fucking christ what an amazing tutorial. Instant sub. cheers!
Nice one bro
Thanks 🔥
Great video, you are maxing out Archicad's modeling capabilities here... :-) are there any parts that could have been done more easily using the Rhino-Grasshopper connection?
Please more of archicad videos!!!
Thanks for this vid. Do you know any resources, free or otherwise, that offer 3d tutorials for classical architecture?
bruh, nice
very nice.
Thanks it was really helpful. I would say this is one of the best archicad modeling videos there is, though I would use something else like Blender Cycles or Redshift for the final render and would also try to fix the jagged arcs. I am myself having problem with archicad with complex profile arc resolution, any tips ?
I want it to have smooth shading in length, but hard arc lines - as if made from slabs.
My known ways are:
1. Changing magic wand settings by switching from "best match" to "linear segments along circles" with bigger number (50-300 depends on size and viewing distance from the object), but the file gets heavy and the model will have horizontal lines over the length..f.e. a pipe will have lines over it's longer axis.. so it starts to look messy.. and even after converting it to morph and making the lines hidden it won't have side lines shown then and the object sides won't be smooth.
2. (better method) Staying with "best match" but making every object at least x10-50 times bigger than you need (in complex profile window).. then, converting everything to morph and only then resizing to correct size.. This makes it look a lot better and smooth, because doing it this way only the profile gets more detailed, but the side stays smooth, but it is very counter-intuitive.
Bro 💚Link to download work files ✔to apply a lesson 👍✔with you step by step and support 💙 and followed 💖
Super video. Vedel by si mi napisat na mail prosim?
you are going way way to fast this is very not understanble
When did the Word who became Immanuel(God with us) become the only begotten Son? This can only be at the immaculate conception/incarnation. And it is at this exact time when that part of Elohim which stayed in heaven takes on the tile of the Father. Elohim does not use these titles before that in the Bible (as far as I know). God[Elohim] has always existed as One God that **share** one and the same Holy Spirit. "And God[Elohim] said , Let *us* make man in *our* image, after *our* likeness: "... And they did! This is clearly Elohim speaking amongst themselves, and they are more than one. But it is impossible that they are (3) Persons - by my (perhaps out of date) definition. Only humans are people, and only people can be persons. God the Father and the Holy Spirit are not humans, not people, and therefore not Persons. Spare me the argument that they are persons because they have personality. My dog has a personality - he is not a person, he is not a human, and therefore not a person. Only the Word became flesh and dwelt among us as a man - and is a person.
It may be of interest to some of you to learn that per older dictionaries, the word Person did not have an expanded definition that would include deity, as the new ones do. webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/Person
Most of the books I read are at least 100 years old and the writers of those books were not using the same definition of Persons as the Seventh-day Adventist Trinitarians are using.
I don't like to even use the work Trinitarian for two reasons:
(1) it's a loaded, subjective, and controversial word these days.
(2) it is not an essential word to describe who and what God[Elohim] is.
Triad, Trinity, Triune... these words are not completely wrong, but not completely accurate either when talking about the Father, Son, and the Holy Ghost *which they share.*
Biblically speaking, that is not (3) individual "Persons", and that is why the word Trinity is not legitimate, for the three aspects of what God[Elohim] is.
John 5:7 "For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one." Yes. Of course. This is who and what God[Elohim] is and always will be. But that in no way makes them (3) individual Persons. God and the Holy Ghost are not humans - which is what you are so desperately trying to establish by the use of the word Trinity.
The poetic lyrics of a lovely hymn are not the basis for sound theology. "God in three Persons blessed Trinity" was not in your grandmothers Christ in Song hymnal, or in your parents 1940's Church Hymnal. That 4th verse was added back into the SDA Hymnal in 1985. Why? And by who? www.truthseeker.church/church-hymnal-changes
All of this debate evaporates if you *stop saying the God is (3) persons* "because they have personality." That is a pathetic argument. My dog has a personality! It does not make him a Person. There is no good reason do diminish God Almighty even in your mind to be a Person.
The God Head of the Bible is (per their current titles) Father, Son, and the Holy Spirit - which they have always shared, and always will. Just my thoughts on the matter. I am open to other views if they are Biblical.
slower please, brazilian here !!