Hi Kelly, thank you for your video I found it really interesting. I particularly liked your mathematical associations and also your belief that these associations could be correct or incorrect. Or then, that some could be deliberate and some could be accidental, I personally think that both are true and I almost think that the accidental ones are also deliberate. Because Kubrick was so particular about the atmosphere he wanted to create and was so interested in subliminal images in advertising and other media, it makes sense that we have the inclusion of a number of ‘sums’ that don’t always make sense. We could possibly be aware of the repetition of the number 42 subliminally just as a device to make us uneasy, without any reason for that specific number.He may or may not have had reasons behind that number however it’s repetition in images and patterns may subconsciously make the viewer see a pattern that they can’t resolve on a subconscious level. That in itself would make a viewer uneasy I feel. With the theories about the holocaust and that ‘42’ it would certainly add an extra level, but I wonder if he used a ‘32’ and repeated patterns of 32 that we subconsciously registered but couldn’t resolve they’d still make us unsettled. Who knows. One thing I think you hit upon is your past and why this film hits home, I don’t think enough people cover this or think in that way. In my mind the most important thing about the film is the description of the breakdown of a family unit from a child’s eyes. In that child’s eyes, nothing makes sense and caring figures can turn into monsters. I feel sometimes that the reason that some of us with less than ideal family situations ‘link in’ with the film is because we can remember trying to figure out who’s the ‘ goody and the baddy ‘ and that can very nuanced, and changes like the tide. Obviously that’s from a personal perspective. I wonder sometimes if the film is deep in subliminal meanings and ‘sums’ that don’t add up specifically for this reason, but then the question is why those false paths echo that uneasiness. It’s funny to think of the way the film was initially received which was very bad and is now viewed as the greatest horror film. And that’s the thing, it’s not a horror film at all and that is a completely true statement, lol, it’s also greatest horror film ever made and that is also a true statement, it’s like the seeds needed to germinate over time. I’m sorry this has been such a long comment, I also liked your previous video on the timeline and I forget where I saw it but Kubrick did organise dialogue and scenes into periods of time. I think it was an interview with his writer where he said that but you’d need to look into it. In regards to the timeline maybe, it looked good and generally I’d urge you to continue with your opinions/analysis, there was a few things that I hadn’t known before. Specifically the station wagon and the links with Lolita. If you haven’t watched it, Kubricks daughter made a 24 minute documentary on the making of’. There was only one group of visitors to the set and that was James Mason and family. He was in the documentary, you seem to have found him in the film. Go you🎉 I think the film is so layered and has so many multiple theories that we are in the hedge maze itself. I really enjoyed the content. Many thanks again.
Thank you so much for your thoughtful and detailed comment! I really appreciate you taking the time to share your perspective-it means a lot to me. I completely agree with your point about the accidental feeling deliberate. Kubrick’s meticulous attention to detail makes even the smallest elements feel intentional, which adds to the layers of mystery and interpretation. Your idea that the repetition of 42-or any number-creates unease on a subconscious level is fascinating. It makes sense that even if the meaning isn’t explicit, the unresolved patterns might trigger something primal in the viewer. The concept of “false paths” that echo uneasiness is such a great way to describe it. I hadn’t thought of it quite like that before, but it aligns perfectly with the film’s atmosphere. Your observation about the breakdown of the family unit from a child’s perspective really resonated with me. I think you’re right-viewers who’ve experienced similar dynamics might feel a special connection to The Shining. It’s so true that for a child, nothing makes sense, and the shifting roles of “goody” and “baddy” can be incredibly disorienting. I think Kubrick captured that nuance brilliantly, and it’s why the film strikes such a deep chord for so many people. I also love what you said about The Shining being both “not a horror film” and “the greatest horror film ever made.” It’s such a paradox, and yet it makes perfect sense for this movie. The layers of meaning, combined with how it has been re-evaluated over time, do feel like seeds that needed time to grow. Thank you for mentioning Kubrick’s organization of dialogue and scenes into time periods-I’ll definitely look into that further! And yes, the station wagon links to Lolita are so intriguing. It’s amazing how interconnected his films feel when you start to dig deeper. I also appreciate the shoutout to the James Mason connection! I did notice him in The Shining Documentary, and Kubrick’s layering really does make us feel like we’re in the hedge maze ourselves. Thanks again for the encouragement and for sharing your insights-it really motivates me to keep exploring and sharing my analyses. Your comment gave me a lot to think about, and I’m so glad you’ve been enjoying the content. I hope you’ll stick around for what’s next! Take care, Kelly
Really enjoyed the video, thanks
Thank you very much for watching and commenting! Have a great day! Kelly
@ColoradoKelly you too!
Hi Kelly, thank you for your video I found it really interesting. I particularly liked your mathematical associations and also your belief that these associations could be correct or incorrect. Or then, that some could be deliberate and some could be accidental, I personally think that both are true and I almost think that the accidental ones are also deliberate.
Because Kubrick was so particular about the atmosphere he wanted to create and was so interested in subliminal images in advertising and other media, it makes sense that we have the inclusion of a number of ‘sums’ that don’t always make sense. We could possibly be aware of the repetition of the number 42 subliminally just as a device to make us uneasy, without any reason for that specific number.He may or may not have had reasons behind that number however it’s repetition in images and patterns may subconsciously make the viewer see a pattern that they can’t resolve on a subconscious level. That in itself would make a viewer uneasy I feel. With the theories about the holocaust and that ‘42’ it would certainly add an extra level, but I wonder if he used a ‘32’ and repeated patterns of 32 that we subconsciously registered but couldn’t resolve they’d still make us unsettled. Who knows. One thing I think you hit upon is your past and why this film hits home, I don’t think enough people cover this or think in that way. In my mind the most important thing about the film is the description of the breakdown of a family unit from a child’s eyes. In that child’s eyes, nothing makes sense and caring figures can turn into monsters. I feel sometimes that the reason that some of us with less than ideal family situations ‘link in’ with the film is because we can remember trying to figure out who’s the ‘ goody and the baddy ‘ and that can very nuanced, and changes like the tide. Obviously that’s from a personal perspective. I wonder sometimes if the film is deep in subliminal meanings and ‘sums’ that don’t add up specifically for this reason, but then the question is why those false paths echo that uneasiness. It’s funny to think of the way the film was initially received which was very bad and is now viewed as the greatest horror film. And that’s the thing, it’s not a horror film at all and that is a completely true statement, lol, it’s also greatest horror film ever made and that is also a true statement, it’s like the seeds needed to germinate over time.
I’m sorry this has been such a long comment, I also liked your previous video on the timeline and I forget where I saw it but Kubrick did organise dialogue and scenes into periods of time. I think it was an interview with his writer where he said that but you’d need to look into it. In regards to the timeline maybe, it looked good and generally I’d urge you to continue with your opinions/analysis, there was a few things that I hadn’t known before. Specifically the station wagon and the links with Lolita. If you haven’t watched it, Kubricks daughter made a 24 minute documentary on the making of’. There was only one group of visitors to the set and that was James Mason and family. He was in the documentary, you seem to have found him in the film. Go you🎉 I think the film is so layered and has so many multiple theories that we are in the hedge maze itself. I really enjoyed the content. Many thanks again.
Thank you so much for your thoughtful and detailed comment! I really appreciate you taking the time to share your perspective-it means a lot to me.
I completely agree with your point about the accidental feeling deliberate. Kubrick’s meticulous attention to detail makes even the smallest elements feel intentional, which adds to the layers of mystery and interpretation. Your idea that the repetition of 42-or any number-creates unease on a subconscious level is fascinating. It makes sense that even if the meaning isn’t explicit, the unresolved patterns might trigger something primal in the viewer. The concept of “false paths” that echo uneasiness is such a great way to describe it. I hadn’t thought of it quite like that before, but it aligns perfectly with the film’s atmosphere.
Your observation about the breakdown of the family unit from a child’s perspective really resonated with me. I think you’re right-viewers who’ve experienced similar dynamics might feel a special connection to The Shining. It’s so true that for a child, nothing makes sense, and the shifting roles of “goody” and “baddy” can be incredibly disorienting. I think Kubrick captured that nuance brilliantly, and it’s why the film strikes such a deep chord for so many people.
I also love what you said about The Shining being both “not a horror film” and “the greatest horror film ever made.” It’s such a paradox, and yet it makes perfect sense for this movie. The layers of meaning, combined with how it has been re-evaluated over time, do feel like seeds that needed time to grow.
Thank you for mentioning Kubrick’s organization of dialogue and scenes into time periods-I’ll definitely look into that further! And yes, the station wagon links to Lolita are so intriguing. It’s amazing how interconnected his films feel when you start to dig deeper. I also appreciate the shoutout to the James Mason connection! I did notice him in The Shining Documentary, and Kubrick’s layering really does make us feel like we’re in the hedge maze ourselves.
Thanks again for the encouragement and for sharing your insights-it really motivates me to keep exploring and sharing my analyses. Your comment gave me a lot to think about, and I’m so glad you’ve been enjoying the content. I hope you’ll stick around for what’s next!
Take care,
Kelly
Well done! I never noticed the station wagon in the opening credits. I believe the number six is all over 2001: A Space Odyssey. 😸
I will Definity be looking for the number six when I watch 2001: A Space Odyssey! Thank you and have a great day! Kelly
Interesting 🤔
Thank you! Have a nice day! Kelly
Very fun video! I dont believe a lot of it to be purposely planned by stanley kubrick, but very fun!
station wagon a 56 ford, not 40's automobile
Thank you, good to know!
The hitch hikers guide to the galaxy. 42
Hitchhiker's guide to the universe?
Thanks for catching this!
His birthday is the 24th month?
Nothing gets by you. Thanks
Whos this Qbricks feller
I know I have an issue, I will say the name 50 times before the next video.
@ColoradoKelly just messing with ya! Happy Halloween 🎃
He’s the little no armed guy with the trumpet nose jumping up and down those Atari steps… 42 steps??? Oh shit!
@@mr.e6684 Yes he is! Haha
@@budyfixit Happy Halloween belated! Thank you so much for watching and commenting.
Temtation ?
shoot I forgot the p! My bad!