Conquest of India - The Empty Chair - Extra History - Part 5

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 19 лис 2021
  • Get 50% OFF your first 6-bottle box www.brightcellars.com/extracr... for a total of only $53 including shipping! Bright Cellars is the monthly wine club that matches you with wine that you’ll love. Get started by taking the taste palate quiz to see your personalized matches.
    Cawnpore, India July, 1857. We've been here before, another small British garrison is under siege but this is where our story comes to a head. The EIC, now under "new management" seeks to add India to its "Age of Reform". Scrubbing away the last vestiges of the Mughal Empire and paving the way for "British Civilization".
    If you missed the previous episodes check them out here:
    Part One - A Historical Paradox - • Conquest of India - A ...
    Part Two - East India Companies - • Conquest of India - Ea...
    Part Three - The Black Hole - • Conquest of India - Th...
    Part Four - The Company Raj - • Conquest of India - Th...
    Part Five - The Empty Chair - • Conquest of India - Th...
    ___________
    Want to support the people who make this show?
    Become a Patreon Member & Vote on future Extra History episodes! bit.ly/EHPatreon
    Or show off your fandom with our merch! extracredits.store/
    ___________
    Thanks for participating in this week's discussion! We want you to be aware of our community posting guidelines so that we can have high-quality conversations: www.extracredits.site/extra-c...
    Want more Extra Credits? Subscribe and follow us on social media:
    UA-cam: bit.ly/SubToEC
    Twitter: bit.ly/ECTweet
    Facebook: bit.ly/ECFBPage
    Instagram: bit.ly/ECisonInstagram
    LIVE Shows on Twitch: bit.ly/ECtwitch
    Website at extracredits.site/
    ___________
    Interested in sponsoring an episode? Email us: extracredits@standard.tv
    ___________
    ♪ Get the intro music here!
    bit.ly/1EQA5N7
    *Music by Demetori: bit.ly/1AaJG4H
    ♪ Outro music: "British India" by Tiffany Roman
    #ExtraHistory #ConquestofIndia #History

КОМЕНТАРІ • 797

  • @extrahistory
    @extrahistory  2 роки тому +138

    Thanks again to Bright Cellars for sponsoring this video! Click here www.brightcellars.com/extracredits/ to get 50% off your first 6 bottle box!

    • @connerdalton8887
      @connerdalton8887 2 роки тому +14

      Please no more armchair gig
      It’s so annoying and makes the show seem like it’s talking down to its viewership

    • @bpnk5237
      @bpnk5237 2 роки тому +1

      Could u do a video on Anglo nepalese war

    • @brentgibson8198
      @brentgibson8198 2 роки тому +4

      I want the armchair to be in another series like for example something about Afghanistan

    • @andreimoga7813
      @andreimoga7813 2 роки тому

      what if you're not american? :(
      my search goes on, then

    • @eshanjadhav265
      @eshanjadhav265 2 роки тому +3

      It's surprising that you did not mention the marathas who were the only powerful empire left while the mughals were just reduced to Delhi...
      Seems like your records are based on your prejudiced ancestors.😠

  • @JoaoPedro-gc8mw
    @JoaoPedro-gc8mw 2 роки тому +814

    Loved the series, but I think that jumping from the Battle of Plassey of 1757 directly into the Indian Revolution of 1857, an exact 100-year jump, was too much. There should have been one or two more videos in between 4th and 5th.

    • @mariustan9275
      @mariustan9275 2 роки тому +30

      They have to do the entire series in 5 or 6 episodes so they have to cut a few things. Lies usually corrects this. Its not easy making a video

    • @keaton2312
      @keaton2312 2 роки тому +77

      @@mariustan9275 that’s still no excuse they literally miss the British taking India lol

    • @gregoriancalendar7747
      @gregoriancalendar7747 2 роки тому +12

      They have to cover centuries worth of information in a max 10 min video so cut them some slack.

    • @istudy9
      @istudy9 2 роки тому +29

      They could have added and additional episode, this fast forward really badly

    • @firstnamelastname.7749
      @firstnamelastname.7749 2 роки тому +17

      Yeah I agree, this kind of reinforces the myth that India went directly from Mughal to British rule, while that is completely untrue

  • @thetruerift
    @thetruerift 2 роки тому +1869

    Less animated armchair, more pun hating murder cat on a war elephant.
    But an excellent series nonetheless

    • @DanielGalimidi
      @DanielGalimidi 2 роки тому +50

      The correct amount of time those mascots should appear on screen should be 0 seconds.

    • @petermann673
      @petermann673 2 роки тому +58

      Yeah, honestly, I hate that Armchair and the cat and those asides. They add nothing and are frankly annoying.
      Having the cat as an ongoing visual gag/mascot like say Walpol? Sure. That'd be fine. But as practically a cohost? For the love of god no.

    • @gregoriancalendar7747
      @gregoriancalendar7747 2 роки тому +15

      But I like zoey

    • @aceous99
      @aceous99 2 роки тому +14

      the chair hits too close for home eh?

    • @marcopohl4875
      @marcopohl4875 2 роки тому +4

      where was Zoey this episode anyway?

  • @t.w.mackay11
    @t.w.mackay11 2 роки тому +2765

    This was a fascinating series. But, no disrespect, I could go without more Army. Though I do respect the risk of trying a new character. Can't wait for the next series!

    • @turdferguson3400
      @turdferguson3400 2 роки тому +64

      The point of army is to clear out common misconceptions.

    • @andreasbuehler1821
      @andreasbuehler1821 2 роки тому +344

      @@turdferguson3400 Yes, but that could be done much less annoyingly.

    • @maysugar800
      @maysugar800 2 роки тому +170

      @@turdferguson3400 if only there was a lies episode where they could talk about things and add more context

    • @Deadknight237
      @Deadknight237 2 роки тому +9

      @@andreasbuehler1821 actually I’d say it’s pretty accurate

    • @gentrololol747
      @gentrololol747 2 роки тому +37

      @@Deadknight237 accurate? Maybe. Helpful? Not

  • @napoleonibonaparte7198
    @napoleonibonaparte7198 2 роки тому +1145

    Lesson: Never neglect social studies, geography, geopolitics, cultural studies when you want to conquer, rule, or make an empire.

    • @Leivve
      @Leivve 2 роки тому +31

      Or just kill them all. The dead can't advocate for their liberation after all.

    • @vaterchennurgel8095
      @vaterchennurgel8095 2 роки тому +32

      Dont forget to march into Russia

    • @ecurewitz
      @ecurewitz 2 роки тому +33

      @@vaterchennurgel8095 in winter

    • @deanholderde5959
      @deanholderde5959 2 роки тому +7

      And people say those classes are worthless.

    • @abhijeetpandule5102
      @abhijeetpandule5102 2 роки тому +8

      I wish you have seen or go through same( 0.01) pain and suffering as indian during British rule/raj then you will know British saw indian as slave , pig, human source to be used in war or to make goods /product
      in exchange for next to nothing , if you read in British amry record you will see countless indian die to starvation man made famine etc because of British rule

  • @matthewhearn9910
    @matthewhearn9910 2 роки тому +396

    Maybe a "sequel series" on the Indian Independence Movement, and how it's much bigger and more complicated than Gandhi and his Pacifistic approach - too few in the West have ever heard of Bhagat Singh.

    • @ANKITSINGH-im8kd
      @ANKITSINGH-im8kd 2 роки тому +4

      True

    • @reubennelson4086
      @reubennelson4086 2 роки тому +38

      *Cough cough* shubash chandra bose. One of the most morally gray and interesting characters irl imo.

    • @ayush1ism
      @ayush1ism 2 роки тому +15

      @@reubennelson4086 its very interesting to hear of subhash chandra bose from a western(allied) perspective and how because of that particular reason he has been painted as morally devient, while in india particularly in recent times of heightened nationalism, he is seen to be the ultimate representation of patriotism and love for the motherland, going to the extent of even taking support from the axis. i do have some reservations on his means but his ends are certainly justified!

    • @St0ic_p3rsp3ctives
      @St0ic_p3rsp3ctives 2 роки тому +8

      @@ayush1ism netaji amar rahe

    • @reubennelson4086
      @reubennelson4086 2 роки тому +3

      @@ayush1ism he has always been considered a hero, even before the heightened nationalism.

  • @wak69
    @wak69 2 роки тому +345

    I was really hoping for Zoey to have her War elephant...

    • @ecurewitz
      @ecurewitz 2 роки тому +8

      maybe she could show up in lies

  • @TheOneCalledSloth
    @TheOneCalledSloth 2 роки тому +399

    British did not actually use pig and cow fat for their shot. It was a rumor started by local leaders because the British lowered their salary.

    • @jimmynyarlathotep6857
      @jimmynyarlathotep6857 2 роки тому +42

      The paper was waxed, but many troops’ apprehensions weren’t treated with respect

    • @Wolfeson28
      @Wolfeson28 2 роки тому +126

      The British did use animal fats for their own cartridges, though they quickly moved to stop any such cartridges being supplied to Sepoy units to avoid the exact sort of rumor that started. But, the overall point (which the episode makes) is that the rebellion wasn't really about the cartridges, in the same way that World War I wasn't really about Franz Ferdinand. In each case, the initiating event was simply the spark that allowed many other bigger, long-simmering issues to suddenly boil over.

    • @AmanKumarPadhy
      @AmanKumarPadhy 2 роки тому

      Lol

    • @ayush1ism
      @ayush1ism 2 роки тому +6

      in fact, i read that they had actually used bees wax!

    • @Xalerdane
      @Xalerdane 2 роки тому +3

      I can believe that.

  • @Casey_Bass
    @Casey_Bass 2 роки тому +879

    Please don't bring back the arm chair, I've missed many things of the past from this channels inception, but I will never miss his appearances

    • @Panzzer101
      @Panzzer101 2 роки тому +82

      I actually second this. I find the character annoying. Sorry.

    • @0812EL
      @0812EL 2 роки тому +31

      does anyone notice that the cat is gone? Did the cat pass away if so I am so sorry

    • @tangol8170
      @tangol8170 2 роки тому +7

      yea deffinitely can do without

    • @Juan94766
      @Juan94766 2 роки тому +18

      @@0812EL let's not jump to conclusions here, it's just weird to shoehorn Zoey into every episode.

    • @0812EL
      @0812EL 2 роки тому +4

      @@Juan94766 yeah I'd miss Zoey

  • @andrewklang809
    @andrewklang809 2 роки тому +589

    No mention of the key role the Sikhs and Nepalese played in putting down the 1857 rebellion? The most recently defeated powers on the subcontinent were also the most loyal to the British, since there was mutual respect between them and little sentiment towards Hindu or Muslim Indian nationalism. To the end, the British East India Company practiced good diplomacy.

    • @kazlopez3718
      @kazlopez3718 2 роки тому +13

      Indeed, also one of my critricism

    • @sionsmedia8249
      @sionsmedia8249 2 роки тому +39

      Well we can talk about showing different histories, but EC would never actually show history that goes against their narrative.

    • @s.dwivedi6830
      @s.dwivedi6830 2 роки тому +67

      Wrong analysis, Sikhs supported British coz they were completely against the revival of Mughal Empire as their Sikh Gurus were beheaded by earlier Mughal Emperors.
      On the contrary Muslims and Hindus sided with the Mughal Emperor to save their religion from extremist missionary activities.
      No one had any respect for EIC they were lesser of the two evils, that's why they got support from Sikhs as well as Gurkhas.

    • @mankytoes
      @mankytoes 2 роки тому +40

      Non Brits might also not be aware that the Nepalese soldiers, known as Gurkas, are still an important and extremely well respected part of the British army.

    • @alexanderphilip1809
      @alexanderphilip1809 2 роки тому +7

      @@s.dwivedi6830 your analysis along with OP's are both factors that worked in tandem. A political/societal group could have multiple reasons and imcentives to pursue a course of action.

  • @lerxtlifeson4232
    @lerxtlifeson4232 2 роки тому +111

    This whole series has made me want to see a series on the Indian independence movement. Will you please consider one? Love your channel!

    • @soumendramajumder13
      @soumendramajumder13 2 роки тому +1

      Lerxt you can find that in a Bollywood TV Show named "1857 Kranti" by Sanjay Khan

    • @lerxtlifeson4232
      @lerxtlifeson4232 2 роки тому

      @@soumendramajumder13 I'll have to check that out! Thanks bro!

  • @shino4242
    @shino4242 2 роки тому +132

    Great series, no to Army. The chair was annoying and unnecessary and unfunny.

  • @PowerTrain
    @PowerTrain 2 роки тому +16

    As Indians we learn a lot about theses events in school for many years, however there's no comprehensive and such properly presented work anywhere.
    Really awesome,
    Would really appreciate that the freedom struggle of India , which is never discussed in western history education would be a great topic to cover

    • @orkkojit
      @orkkojit Рік тому +1

      Bhai acche videos banana. Stop making crap

    • @shinybugg9156
      @shinybugg9156 6 місяців тому

      I'd like to see that too

  • @ethanhughes3515
    @ethanhughes3515 2 роки тому +186

    Please never bring the chair back

    • @kirkw7702
      @kirkw7702 2 роки тому +7

      👍

    • @pistolen87
      @pistolen87 2 роки тому +5

      Show some respect, his name is Armie

  • @johnroache6012
    @johnroache6012 2 роки тому +70

    Neat series, but please take “Army” out back…

  • @happymartin6778
    @happymartin6778 2 роки тому +15

    6:46 I don't think I'd say "throw off" moreso "After two world wars and clamor for independence, England gave in and let them go"

  • @CmdrUD87
    @CmdrUD87 2 роки тому +138

    After everything's said and done, I still feel like the lack of internal cohesion within the Mughal empire was ONE MAJOR factor for their eventual downfall.

    • @chaosvii
      @chaosvii 2 роки тому +17

      It’s a pretty consistent theme in history, coordinated efforts & clarity of cause wear down & overcome the political power of divided forces.

    • @michaelramon2411
      @michaelramon2411 2 роки тому +24

      That's pretty common. Throughout the history of colonialism, you'll pretty frequently find that an area has a ruling group and some other groups who hate them and are willing to fight before any outsiders show up. Cortez in Mexico is probably the best example - he brought down the Aztecs with 500 Spaniards because he also had 20,000 anti-Aztec Indians backing him up. (And smallpox.)

    • @Avinashm7
      @Avinashm7 2 роки тому +2

      Lack of competent leaders led to fall and wars etc

    • @cometmoon4485
      @cometmoon4485 2 роки тому +2

      @@michaelramon2411
      What were 20,000 Indians doing in Mexico???

    • @markburke1396
      @markburke1396 2 роки тому

      So India's existence is pretty much down to the British Empire, and in turn making a very interesting country with so many cultures, all without starting a war. Pretty impressive and unique situation!

  • @Anthintendo
    @Anthintendo 2 роки тому +19

    Great series; please, never bring Armie the Arm Chair back.

  • @deftheocelot9125
    @deftheocelot9125 2 роки тому +16

    I imagine Army, during the last minute of the video, slowly realizing that today, as a concept, he dies

  • @Flyingclam
    @Flyingclam 2 роки тому +65

    I wouldn't mind if Army got executed by Cannon along with his potential successors.

  • @rajansinghnandrha1837
    @rajansinghnandrha1837 2 роки тому +18

    Great series, but would've liked to have seen more on their actual conquest of india and perhaps the wars with the individual indian states and the paradoxes of those.

  • @Evan-cv2ws
    @Evan-cv2ws 2 роки тому +15

    Please, I beg of you. Lock army in the cellar and throw away the key.

  • @jimmynyarlathotep6857
    @jimmynyarlathotep6857 2 роки тому +61

    Great series guys! I can respect you trying new things with the armchair character, but maybe you’re just not there yet

  • @WolfLord5
    @WolfLord5 2 роки тому +44

    The British did offer to let the sepoys grease their own cartridges but this was seen as confirming the rumors about them using pig/cow fat

  • @catcharide56
    @catcharide56 2 роки тому +504

    This was a good series, but frankly I felt the armchair narrative device was a little condescending towards the viewership. We can understand things like historical paradox and contingency without being talked down to. Very good series otherwise.

    • @connerdalton8887
      @connerdalton8887 2 роки тому +31

      100% agree

    • @li-23
      @li-23 2 роки тому +18

      Agreed, there's several books (William Alrymple's 'The Anarchy: the relentless rise of the east india company' as one example) who cover the period in much more detail and without the...armchair approach.

    • @kirkw7702
      @kirkw7702 2 роки тому +2

      Agreed 💯

    • @addisonwelsh
      @addisonwelsh 2 роки тому +9

      With how the channel is going recently, it's no surprise they'd take that tone.

    • @NewRomens
      @NewRomens 2 роки тому +4

      @@addisonwelsh what do you mean by that?

  • @chtulufhtagn1344
    @chtulufhtagn1344 2 роки тому +64

    Good series except for the armchair

  • @harrisonlee9585
    @harrisonlee9585 2 роки тому +14

    The novels of The Raj Quartet and Staying On, both by Paul Scott, are great glimpses into the end of the British Raj

  • @ethandew1768
    @ethandew1768 2 роки тому +7

    You should do a series on karl marx

  • @M.E.ANDHistory
    @M.E.ANDHistory 2 роки тому +89

    Great series! Keep 'em comin'!
    Ideas for EC History:
    1) The Lincoln Assassination (complete with the kidnapping plot, the manhunt, and, of course, JWB's conspirators and the military trial that followed in the aftermath).
    2) The Time of Troubles (complete with the Romanovs coming into power).
    3) Peter the Great (a series was done on Catherine; we need to know about Peter, too).
    4) The French Revolution.
    5) Empress Maria Theresa of Austria.
    6) A mini-video about a little-known failed assassination attempt known as the Ōtsu Incident.
    Ideas for EC Literature:
    1) Les Miserables.
    2) War and Peace.
    3) Macbeth.
    4) Hamlet.
    5) The Divine Comedy.
    6) Canterbury Tales.

    • @abhijeetashiya8856
      @abhijeetashiya8856 2 роки тому +2

      Wow

    • @M.E.ANDHistory
      @M.E.ANDHistory 2 роки тому +4

      @@abhijeetashiya8856 What can I say? I love history and literature!

    • @abhijeetashiya8856
      @abhijeetashiya8856 2 роки тому +5

      @@M.E.ANDHistory I hope ec reads this and work on these projects or at least some of them

    • @M.E.ANDHistory
      @M.E.ANDHistory 2 роки тому +3

      @@abhijeetashiya8856 Here's hoping! 🤞

  • @cosmedelustrac5842
    @cosmedelustrac5842 2 роки тому +23

    Please do the Takeda Shingen series that you promised so long ago next.

    • @300fusionfall
      @300fusionfall 2 роки тому +3

      I also remember them wanting to do Zenobia.

  • @pabloruiz8597
    @pabloruiz8597 2 роки тому +84

    Frankly, I'm surprised that the Sepoy Rebellion of 1857 wasn't more successful. Again, the British were waaaaaaaay outnumbered by the native Indians. Only a few years after 1857, the British were trying to take over China in the Second Opium War, but the Chinese held firm, were very united and expelled the British and French armies back to the coastal treaty ports in China. So again: divide and conquer really won the day for the British. The Brits were experts at getting Indians divided and not united. So when the Sepoys rebelled, there were few princes in Oudh (modern Uttar Pradesh) and other regions that were willing to support the rebellion. Most Indian princes, nicely bribed by vast British taxpayer funds, stayed put and did not bring their armies to bear against the British. The Brits thus isolated the rebels and crushed them, knowing full well the rest of India was fine with this outcome.

    • @Praisethesunson
      @Praisethesunson 2 роки тому +9

      The British literally invented the Marshall races as a way to keep Indians divided

    • @chrisbotos
      @chrisbotos 2 роки тому +27

      The Chinese didn't hold firm whatsoever , but rest is correct.

    • @Packless1
      @Packless1 2 роки тому

      ...divide and rule...
      ...works always...! :-(

    • @vinjed
      @vinjed 2 роки тому +3

      Divide and rule is very effective with Indians. Even today!

    • @vid655
      @vid655 2 роки тому +13

      The division was always present in india. Most of the soilders on British payrome were indian. Most princely states fought for personal reasons, e.g: the doctrine of lapse, which would diminish their power. Heck, many wars that the British fought were due to invitations by indian claimants for some throne, e.g: the anglo maratha war. Indian was never a country to begin with, but a continent masquerading as a country. The one thing definitively given by the British to India is modern day nationalism that is prevalent in the place. The British conquest of India is a real life example of two mens quarel third mans gain.

  • @eduardoandresserrato6189
    @eduardoandresserrato6189 2 роки тому +8

    I was never taught about the mughal empire! The movies always made me assume the british conquered the indians by having more resources and technology, this has been very enlightening, THANKS.

  • @mpspenguin2
    @mpspenguin2 2 роки тому +17

    Would love to see a series on the Partition of the British Raj later on, great series!

  • @VeryKuteB0y
    @VeryKuteB0y 2 роки тому +80

    As an Indian we were never taught about how the mutineers murdered the wives & children of the British soldiers.
    Thanks you guys!

    • @ANKITSINGH-im8kd
      @ANKITSINGH-im8kd 2 роки тому +1

      Haven't you read history.

    • @ayooshiyer8621
      @ayooshiyer8621 2 роки тому +3

      We were always taught this......they soldiers didn't directly kill them but they were supposed to cross a river.There a mob spotted them and killed them.This greatly angered the british and made them hungry for revenge.

    • @StephensCrazyHour
      @StephensCrazyHour 2 роки тому +9

      The thing is that your education system has political goals (just like every other education system). Which parts of history you tell and which you skip over is massively important.

    • @tams805
      @tams805 2 роки тому +2

      @@ANKITSINGH-im8kd If you'd seen the state of Indian history education...

    • @anirudh177
      @anirudh177 2 роки тому +6

      It's a war, what do you expect? people are obviously going to slaughter and kill civilians, this sort of stuff happened all the time back in the day.

  • @bryansylvestrew5024
    @bryansylvestrew5024 2 роки тому +17

    OMG i love the curse of Strahd reference at the end there

    • @meyertimothyj
      @meyertimothyj 2 роки тому +1

      Glad somebody else caught this too!

  • @amammonster1239
    @amammonster1239 2 роки тому +4

    This series is so informative! Thank you!

  • @dirkwickline4528
    @dirkwickline4528 2 роки тому +8

    I find the Armi character very condescending

  • @LucianoThePig
    @LucianoThePig 2 роки тому +98

    I have to say, I'm glad I'm not the only one who dislikes the armchair. In general I don't think this channel needs sidekicks or even a lot of jokes

    • @aceous99
      @aceous99 Рік тому +2

      lighten up a little, its youtube not a university speaker hall.

  • @Salem_Rabbit
    @Salem_Rabbit 2 роки тому +52

    Extra History ideas for future videos.
    The Hippie Trail
    The Siege of Kaaba
    The Teapot Dome Scandal
    The Discovery of Victoria Falls
    The Pol Plot
    The Siege of Sarajevo
    The Yarmuk Negotiation.
    The Invasion of Crimea.
    The Kiev of Russ.

    • @prathamsaxena9503
      @prathamsaxena9503 2 роки тому +1

      They will not do a video on Crimea

    • @oofoof4875
      @oofoof4875 2 роки тому

      @@prathamsaxena9503 it's too recent i assume?

    • @Aaaaaaaaaaaaa558
      @Aaaaaaaaaaaaa558 2 роки тому

      The siege of kaaba is pivotal to middle east

    • @samwiseshanti
      @samwiseshanti 2 роки тому

      They did a video on the kieven russ, although admittedly 1 video as part of a longer series

  • @romanoddle9379
    @romanoddle9379 2 роки тому +50

    Liked the series, didn’t like the armchair

  • @jogzyg2036
    @jogzyg2036 2 роки тому +2

    I opened this video and got an ad that said "are you a trader?" With the British flag flying in the background. Pretty much sums up the story.

  • @andromeda331
    @andromeda331 2 роки тому +1

    Thank you for the series on the Conquest of India. It was very good.

  • @a.d.malcolmson3759
    @a.d.malcolmson3759 2 роки тому +3

    A lovely series, as always: entertaining and educational! I'm eager for the "Lies" episode!

  • @julianandressalazar5755
    @julianandressalazar5755 2 місяці тому

    This is the best history series to understand the topic. All of the other ones I have seen have left me with nuances.

  • @meepislife8787
    @meepislife8787 2 роки тому +1

    Thanks for this, going through this in school rn. It’s helped a lot

  • @MatheusProfBarbado
    @MatheusProfBarbado 2 роки тому +31

    very nice info about Indian History! really... but the "armchair joke" is not fun. Please no more of this character...

  • @DevinBrooking
    @DevinBrooking 2 роки тому +4

    Is this really the end? I feel like there is so much more about this subject

  • @IcecreamMcGuy
    @IcecreamMcGuy 2 роки тому +1

    So happy this came out...it’s been a long week ok!?

  • @nikhiljoshiPi
    @nikhiljoshiPi 2 роки тому +1

    I was hoping that the episode would drop today!

  • @Lyrics4UAll
    @Lyrics4UAll 2 роки тому +14

    No more armchair, thanks!

  • @benjaminharding4038
    @benjaminharding4038 2 роки тому +3

    Saying that a rebellion in 1857 was about getting rid of cultural imperialism and racial inequality sounds like a bit of a simplification, no? Who were the leaders? What were their interests? Its really great to deconstruct the "british conquest" of India but that shouldn't then translate into any form or idealisation of those who opposed the british.

  • @ThinksFarToMuch
    @ThinksFarToMuch Рік тому +1

    Anyone else spending part of their holiday break binge watching a TON of episodes of Extra History?

  • @abdullahabu6439
    @abdullahabu6439 2 роки тому +4

    The EIC had told the Mughal Emporer (Bahadur Shah Zafar II)that once he dies the ruling dynasty ends do you think that making Queen Victoria "Empress of India" was planned from the beginning and that deposing him in 1857 helped also knowing she wasn't crowned until 15 years of his death ?

  • @Ok-jh4cp
    @Ok-jh4cp 2 роки тому +1

    Love your videos

  • @jeevansidhu9976
    @jeevansidhu9976 2 роки тому +6

    I'm a little disappointed in the fact that Punjab and Sikhs were barely mentioned. Great series overall.

  • @gracefulcubix4730
    @gracefulcubix4730 2 роки тому +5

    This is an Interesting perspective of the colonization of India.

  • @Bounsingonbongos1
    @Bounsingonbongos1 2 роки тому

    I recently finished my Masters thesis on the Orientalist-Anglicist debate over the language and literature of Indian public education. Glad to see this series!

    • @AbhiMoz
      @AbhiMoz Рік тому

      Is there really a debate over it? Indians have to adopt English for business and trade opportunities. Meanwhile we have to learn our local languages too to tie us into our identity and culture.

  • @pawernielsbroek3971
    @pawernielsbroek3971 2 роки тому +5

    V.o.c next??

  • @user-cd4bx6uq1y
    @user-cd4bx6uq1y Рік тому +1

    This was really great

  • @Billi_crow
    @Billi_crow 2 роки тому

    this is such a good series :) enjoyed this one
    edit: i’m looking forward to more south asian subjects in the future!!

  • @OhSkyeLanta
    @OhSkyeLanta 2 роки тому

    Hope you guys follow up eventually with a series about the journey to Indian Independence

  • @Kuudere-Kun
    @Kuudere-Kun 2 роки тому +2

    Do a series a second opium war and the Bengal famine and you'll have a pretty complete saga of British imperialism in Asia on the books.

  • @moksh7302
    @moksh7302 2 роки тому +3

    I didn't knew about the massacre of 200 women and children. It's not taught in history.

  • @Lapkonium
    @Lapkonium 2 роки тому +121

    “If Mughals maintained power, there would still be mistakes, but Indian mistakes to make!” … You know that they’re a foreign Invading empire too, right?

    • @xJavelin1
      @xJavelin1 2 роки тому +46

      Yeah they're going way too far there. And seriously the idea that a Delhi based government could possibly be considered to be "local" in a country the size of India is beyond ridiculous. It's easy to point to the harm British rule caused to India, but the alternatives were never going to turn India into Utopia. They are just different grades of bad.

    • @ritikshaw5868
      @ritikshaw5868 2 роки тому +25

      Which intermingled with populace and the emperor stayed in Agra and then Delhi and married Indian princesses. They were indianised.. And not the other way around. The British did everything in the opposite way.

    • @krishnamurthyk9797
      @krishnamurthyk9797 2 роки тому +5

      @@xJavelin1 , couldn't say anything. The Marathas had the largest area. They could have established independent Indian rule.

    • @GoDLiKeKakashi
      @GoDLiKeKakashi 2 роки тому +23

      @@ritikshaw5868 How could that be possible in a landmass with perhaps the most diversity in terms of cultures? Wtf does "indianised" even mean in this context? They still practiced a foreign religion and kept a form of government that came with their ancestors. It's like saying that the Kievan Rus were all Greek-fied because they adopted Orthodox Christianity and some married Byzantine princesses. These things were done to prop up their power and legitimacy, that's all.

    • @ritikshaw5868
      @ritikshaw5868 2 роки тому +5

      @@GoDLiKeKakashi they indianised because theirs a theme of Indianness despite the diversity which can be easily identified. True they were Persianised before that but when they came they culture got influenced by the Indians which can be seen in their architecture which is a mix of Indian and persian styles. And from Akbars reign they tried seeing themselves more Indian then outsiders. The sultans of Delhi were a different breed though.

  • @shawnheatherly
    @shawnheatherly 2 роки тому

    A fascinating story of conquest.

  • @dezopenguin9649
    @dezopenguin9649 2 роки тому +1

    Okay, but was the "Red Dragon Crush" label on the wine bottle in the ad a low-key shout-out to the episode topic, because that D&D wine specifically was created in module B7 _Rahasia,_ which applied a (very thin) gloss of Indian-inspired details to the elven culture in the adventure?

  • @SafavidAfsharid3197
    @SafavidAfsharid3197 2 роки тому +3

    Should have mentioned the Deccan famine and Na ankh famine.

  • @trollmaster6705
    @trollmaster6705 2 роки тому

    Great series, we will be waiting for you to return to India.

  • @jmalko9152
    @jmalko9152 2 роки тому

    Fascinating!

  • @MultiSciGeek
    @MultiSciGeek 2 роки тому

    Done done. That was well done.

  • @Its_just_Avi
    @Its_just_Avi 2 роки тому +2

    So fascinating to see a video about your own city on top of that at start of the video (cawnpore now rebamed as Kanpur)not even my country, MY VERY OWN CITY !!!!!!!😀😀😀😀😎😎😎😎👍👍😣😣😣❤️❤️❤️❤️😄😘😘😂

  • @laosi4278
    @laosi4278 2 роки тому +4

    Funny thing is the Mughal whom British did overthrown was just another foreign invader who managed to conquered most of India

    • @03.achyuthans39
      @03.achyuthans39 2 роки тому

      But they became Indian. Much different from those who looted the subcontinent and made their own lands richer

    • @anirudh177
      @anirudh177 2 роки тому

      @@03.achyuthans39 yeah, Akbar and his successors can be considered as Indian.

  • @blinkyrem
    @blinkyrem 2 роки тому +119

    I find the Armchair really patronising and a misstep for ExtraHistory.

    • @jupiter1789
      @jupiter1789 2 роки тому +19

      Exactly, it's childish
      (but a nice try)

    • @dsargus3
      @dsargus3 2 роки тому +5

      Same

    • @addisonwelsh
      @addisonwelsh 2 роки тому +6

      Not really surprising with the way the channel has been going recently.

    • @jupiter1789
      @jupiter1789 2 роки тому +7

      @@addisonwelsh they should make the rise and fall of their channel

  • @AjarTadpole7202
    @AjarTadpole7202 2 роки тому +1

    Comparing the British Government to the EIC gives you that feeling of "no wait you weren't supposed to do that" but x100

  • @maguszxz
    @maguszxz 2 роки тому

    Laughing at Micheal the Drunkard during the Bright Cellars ad read, lol

  • @leeboy26
    @leeboy26 2 роки тому +51

    4:45 -Though undoubtedly barbaric, this was actually a pretty common punishment used by the Mughals.

    • @yj9032
      @yj9032 2 роки тому +5

      This series ignored a lot of atrocities committed by the British. Especially by the British tax collectors in the countryside.

    • @angrymanwithsillymoustasche
      @angrymanwithsillymoustasche 2 роки тому +2

      No

  • @skjj2550
    @skjj2550 2 роки тому

    Amazing 👏👏👏👏

  • @tutupre
    @tutupre 2 роки тому +1

    Do a Independence of India Series as well

  • @aidanunleashed1878
    @aidanunleashed1878 2 роки тому +6

    Love you guys and your work but could personally do without armie anymore

  • @user-ey5hl3ee9u
    @user-ey5hl3ee9u 2 роки тому +1

    I still don't understand what was the empty chair they refer to in the title of episode? I thought it referred to the Indian Thorne of the mugol's been empty

  • @Kurorito
    @Kurorito 2 роки тому

    3:13 it's the cutest sundae ever!

  • @raikaria3090
    @raikaria3090 2 роки тому +44

    But... the Mughals weren't Indian *either*
    India was already under the yolk. The Mughals were themselves a foreign power
    It's not as weird as Egypt; which was basically under foreign rule for literal millellia, but yeah...

    • @bendries4123
      @bendries4123 2 роки тому

      True yet the Mughals for the most part were relatively competent rules that respected the many cultures and religions of India compared to the British who were basically as they said absentee landlords

    • @RM-ei6be
      @RM-ei6be 2 роки тому +11

      Meghals lived in India, and died in India, and didn't take the resources out of the country.

    • @Aiasmor
      @Aiasmor 2 роки тому +8

      Maybe originally, yet by the end to call them not Indian would have been foolish (or even by Shah Jahan, who had a Rajput mother and grandmother!). The last Emperor Bahadur Shah Zafar II had several photos taken of him at the end and of his sons, and you could not mistake him for being Persian or even a Turk! Just look on the wiki page for the mothers of the Mughal Emperors, there are more Indians on the list than Persians or Turks! And the last six Empresses were Hindu!

    • @bilalsher8047
      @bilalsher8047 2 роки тому +1

      Seems to be a modern Indian narrative that the Mughals were not Indian. If that's the case, the Taj Mahal is not an Indian cultural landmark.

    • @ajarofmayonnaise3250
      @ajarofmayonnaise3250 2 роки тому

      Who tf were Mughals, if they wasn’t Indian? As the dude said, they lived in India, died in India.

  • @erikpersson0884
    @erikpersson0884 2 роки тому +1

    I feel like this episode messier than other of their series

  • @harpman476
    @harpman476 2 роки тому

    Please do an extra history series on the permian- Triassic extinction a.k.a. the great dying it could be a special called “extra prehistory”.

  • @Leivve
    @Leivve 2 роки тому +69

    One thing I don't like about this series is that you kind of just bundle all Indians together like they were some unified culture, which wasn't true in the slightest; not only is there massive cultural diversity, there is also racial disparity between native Indians and Aryans. There was no "Paradox" that happened. What happened was an outside power that moved in and took advantage of divisions and cracks within the sub-continent to expand their personal powerbase, and just happened to take the whole prize.

    • @shalinitiwariscorner5210
      @shalinitiwariscorner5210 2 роки тому +9

      There are no racial disparities in Indian community for sure. There is only colourism in typical beauty standards which is a result of post-colonial inferiority complex.
      However, India is a cosmopolis since pre-historic era. That's why Sumerian elamites, Aryans, Iranians and Austric people intermingled for many centuries. We have a collective & tightly knit gene-pool, ethnicity, cultural and philosophical heritage.

    • @andyjay729
      @andyjay729 2 роки тому +1

      Didn't the British use their "Aryan" ancestry to try to win over at least the northern Indians? Divide and conquer...

    • @Aiasmor
      @Aiasmor 2 роки тому +13

      That has no historical or demographic basis. Even North Indians have significant admixture from the South and Central Asia, and vice versa. There was no "Aryan" race that existed in India, at least in the past thousand years.

    • @ajarofmayonnaise3250
      @ajarofmayonnaise3250 2 роки тому

      Something says that you are not Indian.

    • @anirudh177
      @anirudh177 2 роки тому

      "there is also racial disparity between native Indians and Aryans."
      What exactly do you mean by that? While there were significant differences between the cultures in the subcontinent, by the time the British arrived there were no "Pure Aryans", and race is a social construct anyway, there is really no such thing as "race" anyway. Ethnic, religious. Linguistic and caste-based differences existed.

  • @Etom.
    @Etom. 2 роки тому +26

    I miss when this series was more like story telling with history and not attempting a new concept every series.

    • @piperjj4486
      @piperjj4486 2 роки тому +4

      Same, less of a bias thing and more of like you said, a story.

  • @FidgetSpinoza
    @FidgetSpinoza 2 роки тому +42

    Army was a great idea, but im not sure this is the iteration you're looking for. Thanks to everyone for the amazing content :)

  • @soumendramajumder13
    @soumendramajumder13 2 роки тому

    @extracredits the Sepoy Mutiny started in Barrackpore, Bengal by Sepoy Mangal Pandey, then moved to Cawnpore, under the leadership of Nana Saheb Peshwa and Rani Lakshmibai.

  • @vintagerain2585
    @vintagerain2585 2 роки тому +1

    i have a suggestion you can make on vid to how to code a game (i dont mean the tips that you did 4-5 years ago)

  • @Robytmro
    @Robytmro 2 роки тому +5

    Juxtaposing the British rule of India with the Mughals is a bit misleading, as the Mughals were themselves foreign conquerors for most Indians. While some emperors were tolerant, others, like Aurangzeb, were pretty opressive.

    • @anirudh177
      @anirudh177 2 роки тому

      After Akbar they were Indians anyway.

  • @GetDwightKSchrutesubs
    @GetDwightKSchrutesubs 2 роки тому +1

    Extra Credits couldn’t handle my undivided attention.

  • @theshadowsagas3617
    @theshadowsagas3617 2 роки тому

    Michael the Drunkard cameo at 8:33

  • @primadonnalewis1236
    @primadonnalewis1236 2 роки тому +2

    Do extra history on the Khmer Empire

  • @sushanalone
    @sushanalone 2 роки тому +1

    @Extra Credits
    You need the 'Elephant in the Room' animation like the Arm Chair animation for future videos ;D!

  • @alienworm1999
    @alienworm1999 2 роки тому +16

    this series was really good except for the constant contempt for/belittling of your audience through Army

  • @Elimino_P
    @Elimino_P 2 роки тому +1

    My favorite part is how nobody spent 10 seconds to check the definition of "paradox".

  • @Edmonton-of2ec
    @Edmonton-of2ec 2 місяці тому

    For anyone wondering, George V and Queen Mary did actually attend their Durbar in person, but that would be the last. Edward VIII abdicated before one could even be planned, while George VI’s was shelved due to balking at the expenditure by both the Raj and the British government and the quickly approaching Second World War. George VI would forgo the title of Emperor of India in June 1948, remaining King of India until 1950, while Elizabeth II would remain Queen of Pakistan until 1956.

  • @iwatchDVDsonXbox360
    @iwatchDVDsonXbox360 2 роки тому +11

    Honestly, i wish instead of this you would've done multiple series like "Rebellion of 1857", "Anglo-maratha wars" (separate series for each one), "Anglo-mysore wars" (separate series for each one) and "Anglo-sikh wars" (separate series for each one).

  • @AudieHolland
    @AudieHolland 2 роки тому

    *Does anyone know* where I can find the video intro where he is reading off a script to advertise the channel
    then he finds out the script was edited by Zoey 'to give Zoey more treats?'

  • @jo3
    @jo3 2 роки тому

    Commercials for alcohol consumption are inappropriate for this channel.
    Thankyou for another memorable serie.