What’s common between Netflix Chamkila and Trudeau’s trouble-infested Canada? They don’t get Punjab
Вставка
- Опубліковано 10 тра 2024
- Even in the weeks leading up to Chamkila’s assassination, there were massacres every other day. To airbrush all of this is sheer intellectual cowardice, if not a crime. And you know what, just as smug Bollywood filmmakers would like us to believe now that what Punjab - and the Sikhs - endured in 1988 was just some bad crime, Trudeau’s Canadians now see the Sikh diaspora gangs in their countries, who’ve all slipped through their immigration filters, though the same lens. Watch this week's #NationalInterest with ThePrint Editor-in-chief Shekhar Gupta
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
• ‘Civil services cannot...
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exclusive content, special privileges & more - Subscribe to ThePrint for Special benefits: theprint.in/subscribe/
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Connect with ThePrint
» Subscribe to ThePrint: theprint.in/subscribe/
» Subscribe to our UA-cam Channel: bit.ly/3nCMpht
» Like us on Facebook: / theprintindia
» Tweet us on Twitter: / theprintindia
» Follow us on Instagram: / theprintindia
» Find us on LinkedIn : / theprint
» Subscribe to ThePrint on Telegram: t.me/ThePrintIndia
» Find us on Spotify: spoti.fi/2NMVlnB
» Find us on Apple Podcasts: apple.co/3pEOta8
What is most unfortunate as a consequence of all of this is that Sikh Indian nationalists like us living abroad get the raw end of the stick from both sides. Indians now (often unknowingly) consider us to be Khalistanis, even though we have no intent or reason to want it, and Sikhs abroad consider us to be traitors. A truly disheartening state of affairs.
I can understand and sympathize sir. But nationalist Sikhs like yourself should be more vocal in condemning these khalistani idiots who are puppets of Pakistan and some loonies like pannu and jagmeet Singh. You should make your self heard strong and loud so that the world knows these guys are just fools and don’t have support. That will help. But hope things get well. Lots of love Respect to you and our nationalist Sikh brothers. Also you should all condemn the growing religious intolerance. It is moving towards Islam in terms of be-adhbi and related violence
I had a Punjabi Sikh colleague where I work in US. I actually supported her recruitment. But after she joined, the undercurrent of hostility towards me from her was palpable.
It is terrifying to even think that Indians dont know the difference between sikhs and khalistanis.
Dont say that.
Sikh gurus belong to the "Bharatiya Guru Parampara". Sikh follow their path. But both sikh and non-sikh follow their teachings.
Dont feed into the propaganda of ISI and khalistan by saying s7ch a thing brother.
shall I know why Sikhs abroad consider you as traitor?
@@cp6947 I've faced this first had brother, when an Uber driver in Bangalore asked me if I was Khalistani. Fortunately, both of us spoke Telugu, and I very calmly explained to him the difference. When I asked him how he found out, he said that he some videos on whatsapp. It is precisely this messaging of misinformation and hate that will lead to harmful consequences for innocents.
Shekhar criticized the movie because "it failed to mention some uncomfortable truths" but in this very same video, he himself deliberately failed to mention that the massacres were targeted against the Hindus by the radical Sikhs. Most of the Indian journalists do not have any moral right to accuse others of skipping uncomfortable truths because they themselves are the biggest perpetrators of this crime.
Chamkila was result of caste honour killing
Less than 100 killed vs 30k deaths,lay out your sources
massacres against hindus...pata bhi hai...khalistanio ne sikh kitney maarey...khalistanio ne sab je jaiyda leftist maarey...us hisssab se toh khalistani BJP ki B team lag rahey hain
So you’re saying a Hindu majority nation with Hindu majority govt at centre haven’t even published a single report with approximate number of Hindu “massacre” . Shame on you
What proof do you have that those Hindus were killed by Sikhs ?
Terrorism didn’t end in 1993. It was in 1994 that the Punjab CM Sardar Beant Singh was assassinated. It was completely uprooted much later, by mid 1995.
He was assassinated in 1995
Good riddance
I stand corrected. Yes, 1995. My point is that terrorism didn’t end in 1993.
Khalistan zindabad
@@saleemsajid8319kahlistani want punjab right so let them start first getting it from pakistan as the original part of Punjab is in pakistan.
But this is the trend nowadays, cherry picking of incidents devoid of context and serve a baseless flase narratives of history,
Another major truth about punjab at that time was Hindu genocide, we hear numerous stories of killing of hindus from grandparents at that time, how they use to stop buses & ask all the Hindu guys to make a line and shoot them, everyone in punjab knows about it, how many hindu families left their properties, u can go to any town and ask u will find so many examples, elder people talk about it so casually that their brother was killed, thier neighbors son was killed that family left, how they survived, but u never hear about it, in any news, documentaries.
Yup killings off buses were not warranted, usually killing poor migrant workers which doesnt get you anywhere... IT was usually done by misguided youth, hardcore fake militant criminals and CATS of the indian police dressed as Kharkus - the latter doing like 90% of the dirt to defame the movement in rural punjab.
What is the definition of a Genocide?
Isn't it much closer to 1984 Delhi?
Punjabi Hindus became victim of terrorist activities from time to time but it was nothing close to government and community supported Genocide of Sikhs. Let's not Forget Rajiv Gandhi got 400+ seats on the back of 1984 Delhi Genocide and Modi got thumping victory after 2002 Gujrat riots.
There is reason why BJP is not able to break into Punjab. Punjabi Hindus know who is their own and who want to use them. They are much smarter than Sanghified and hindi speaking Punjabis of Delhi/NCR
Shekhar hit the nail on the head. I felt the same while watching the movie. Skirting away from the issue at heart.
And now off course Canada is playing with fire.
Separatism is not a big deal in Western nations. Neither is it illegal. There is a Quebecois separatist party that has MPs in the Canadian Parliament. Separatism is a big deal in India, not in Canada.
@@prasanthalphaIt shouldn't be a big deal in India as India has done lot of s***, please stop glorifying your country, it committed Sikh genocide.
Indian are the most insecure people.
@@prasanthalphaWhy Should India Be Divided into Multiple Nation-States
India (Republic of India) didn't exist before 1947. Italy didn't exist before 1861. Turkey didn't exist before 1922, Germany didn't exist before 1871, Saudi Arabia didn't exist before 1932 and so on. Concept of Countries was invented in Europe in the 18th century. Before the invention of the concept of countries, there were only empires and kingdoms everywhere around world. Germany, France, Italy, Austria, Denmark, Poland, Switzerland, Slovenia, Netherlands, lechesiten etc were created after fall of 1000 yrs old Holy Roman empire in 1806. Italy and Germany were created in 1861 and 1871 by merging various small kingdoms of Italian and German nationality. Similarly all European countries were created based on their respective nationalities after the fall of empires and kingdoms across Europe.
After the fall of the 600 yrs long Ottomans empire in 1922, many countries were created based on their nationalities.Saudi Arabia didn't exist When Prophet Muhammad was born in Mecca.Turkey was created in 1923 and Saudi Arabia was created in 1932 after the fall of Ottomans Empire in 1922. Europe and Middle East was united under various empires and kingdoms for most of the history just like India. India was the name for the region east to river Indus. It was never a country before 1947 but a region or subcontinent where various empires and kingdoms existed just like in Europe, Middle East or other parts and continents of world.
Now the question is what is nation and nationality? A nation is a society that shares a common language, culture, and history and has shared interests. For example English, German, Italian, Turkish, French, Russian, Dutch, Spanish, Arabs, Persian, Kurds, Japanese, Korean, Punjabi, kashmiri, Marathi, Bengali, Tamil, Malyalam, Thai etc are nations and a country based on single nation or nationality or where a single nationality dominates culturally, politically, in economy and military is called a nation state. Most countries in Europe or 'civilised world' are based on single nationalities and are nation states or simply called nations.
There are dozens of nations within India and Pakistan. And hence India and Pakistan are union of nations or multinational countries. Nations are Punjab, Kashmir, sindh, Baluchistan, Gujarat, Bengal, Maharashtra, Tamilnadu etc. And in modern civilised world countries are created on basis of nationality like the countries in Europe (England, France, Germany, Poland, Norway, Sweden, Croatia etc) or in Asia (Korea, Japan, China,Thailand, Philippines etc) and Bangladesh etc are countries based on nationalities.
Among the 650 major nations in the world, the nations in the union of India are one of the largest nations in the world. After Han Chinese Mandrain, Spanish, Anglo Saxons English, and Arabic
Bengali - world's 5th largest nationality
Punjabi- 10th largest nationality in world
Marathi- 13th largest nationality in world
Hindustani- 14th largest
Telugu- 15th largest nationality
Tamil- 17th largest nationality in world
Gujarati- 24th largest nationality in world
Bhojpuri- 25th largest
Kannada- 29thth largest
Malyalam- 30th largest
Oriya- 32nd largest
Maithili- 40th largest
Awadhi- 46th largest
Assamese- 65th largest
Haryanvi, Marwari, Magahi, Deccan, etc in top 100 nationalities of world.
(Hindi, Urdu are not nationalities but artificial languages developed from Hindustani language and imposed on some nations in some regions, with only few native speakers. These regions have their own nationalities and languages. Hindustani is a nationality in western Uttar pradesh with Hindustani as native language).
Republic of India was created in 1947 out of the British Indian empire on the basis of two nations bogus theory. Two nations were assumed as Islam and hindusim. But in reality, Islam and Hinduism are not nations. India and Pakistan were not created based on nationalities (unlike in rest of civilised world) but on two nation (Islam Hinduism) bogus theory. Hence, these countries are based on religions.
On the other hand, Bangladesh is a nation state which was created on the basis of Bangla nationality in 1971 (5th biggest nationality in world). No other nation in the British empire (except Bangla nation) got sovereignty and independence. The sovereignty of all nations changed hands from British empire to two newly created empires based on religions. British empire just transferred ownership rights in 1947.
Three predominant civilisations in Republic of India, Indo Aryans, Dravidian and Sino Tibetic ( North East nations in the Republic of India) don't share anything although the first two civilisations share religion hence religion is the biggest binding force of the country followed by Military Power which is used to occupy non Hindu nations (Punjab, Kashmir, Nagaland, Mizoram, Meghalaya) with the country. Most of Hindus in Indian subcontinent prefer religion over their nationalities unlike muslims (Kashmiri, Bangla, Baluch, Sindhi, Pashto) who identify themselves with their nationalities and even support nation states like Bangladesh.
According to research, Higher ethnic or national diversity within a country negatively affects economic growth through conflict between interests of various nations or ethnicities (Don't confuse the ethnic or national diversity with the multiculturalism in west due to migration, the migrants mix with diverse society and become part of nationality of the host country and work for the interests of the dominant nationality).
High 'nationality or ethnic' Diversity correlates with low GDP per capita.
Strong democracy correlates with ethnic or national homogeneity.
Punjab and Kashmir should be a free countries based on Punjabi and Kashmiri nationalities like Bangladesh. But Hindu Punjabis, Hindu Kashmiris don't want to leave unions of india so Punjabi Sikhs, or Kashmiri muslims can't force them to follow to support the idea of Nation-States. Hindu Punjabis, who had deserted Punjabi language in 1951 and 1961 census by declaring Hindi as their mother tongue would never support a Punjabi nation state. They support a Indian state based on the Hindu religion.
Similarly, Bengali Hindus and Kashmiri Hindus don't support Bangla nation state Bangladesh and Azad Kashmir and want to live in India which is based on Hinduism. So Punjabi Hindus, Kashmiri Hindus and Bengali Hindus are free to stay in their respective countries based on religions. But similar to Bangla Muslims of East Pakistan, who created Bangla nation state Bangladesh without Indian Bengali Hindus, Sikhs have the right to create Azad Punjab (a Punjabi nation state) without Punjabi Hindus and Punjabi Muslims (and Azad Kashmir without Kashmiri Hindus). As simple as that
@@prasanthalpha did canadian separatism causes terrorism...killings of innocent people...? you know better where india has problem...with terrorists...
Even the lobbying rules are much more relaxed in these countries compared to India. That too, I think plays somewhat of a role in building this narrative.
well said and exactly right! You have a Canadian Party leader - Jagmeet Singh who is a khalistani first and a canadian second lol. Ofc he's going to get more khalis into the country illegally to support his cause.
It's time for Punjab and Punjabis to own up their peace and progress. The people of Punjab need to stop being sensitive to what anyone in the world says or thinks. Punjab belongs to the punjabis, who live there, who work and who are rooted to the ground. Punjabis need to condemn and distance themselves from anyone who thinks he can make trouble by rousing emotions.
Your research on this topic is totally worthless. Most of chamkila's contemporaries were not of upper castes as said but were dalits themselves. Kuldeep manak was a dalit who once fought elections from a reserved constitutioncy but lost . Mohd sadik is a dalit who is a sitting MP from a reserved constitutioncy faridkot from where hans raj hans is currently fighting on a BJP ticket. Similarly surinder shinda also was from a lower caste.
You are right. Earlier the singers were used to be Mirasis and other low castes. The upper caste singers started singing much later. Even Lal Chand, who was a Dalit, added 'Yamla Jatt' to his name to avoid discrimination, and became Lal Chand Yamla Jatt.
Shekhar ji deliberately Snubbing The Kashmir Files.
Kashmir Files - seems like the work of a fresh student in NSD
Cry louder
@@TUAREGZEPHYR Victims and people who suffered those incidents are on live television telling the story, and you still mock about it? You must be a madrasa brain washed product! Shameless
Illegal migration, havalla system, cheap Punjabi labor... I have seen this first hand .. some restaurants employ these guys!
Why not ask Salim/yogendra yadav he is World renowned expert as per print .. he will hv every answer on any topic in world 😂😂
You need a brain transplant
You could have named Kashmir files Buddha in a Cafe, Kerala files instead of just Madras cafe for being too close to reality
Because they were not correct depiction with original context. You have recieved info from oneside. Make yourself well informed by listening to other side. This will make you better informed. Rather than living in echo chambers. Applies to me and you and all humans. Livibg in echo chambers and ‘confirmation bias’ is one of the essential flaw of us humans.
Kuchh parh likh leta tu bhi tab yeh nahi kehta chutiye .Teri baat se pata chal raha hai ki tu ek number ka gadha hai
Mr Gupta you are absolutely wrong about Chamkila's competitors being from upper caste. Most of his compitetors were infact from lower caster. Be it Mohammad Sadiq Kuldeep Manak ( Both Mirasis) Kartar Ramla ( SC) Shinda ( BC) many other were either SCs or low caste muslims. His killings had nothing to do with his caste. Jatt sikhs were infact hia biggest fan base.
1947 ਤੋਂ ਪਹਿਲਾਂ ਇੰਡੀਆ,1861 ਤੋਂ ਪਹਿਲਾਂ ਇਟਲੀ, 1871 ਤੋਂ ਪਹਿਲਾਂ ਜਰਮਨੀ, 1922 ਤੋਂ ਪਹਿਲਾਂ ਤੁਰਕੀ, 1932 ਤੋਂ ਪਹਿਲਾਂ ਸਾਊਦੀ ਅਰਬ ਦੇਸ਼ਾਂ ਦੀ ਕੋਈ ਹੋਂਦ ਨਹੀਂ ਸੀ. 18ਵੀ ਸਦੀ ਵਿੱਚ ਯੂਰਪ ਦੇ ਲੋਕਾਂ ਨੇ ਦੇਸ਼ ਬਣਾਉਣ ਦੇ ਵਿਚਾਰ ਦੀ ਕਾਢ ਕੱਢੀ. ਦੇਸ਼ ਬਣਾਉਣ ਤੋਂ ਪਹਿਲਾਂ ਪੂਰੀ ਦੁਨੀਆਂ ਵਿੱਚ ਸਿਰਫ ਰਾਜਿਆਂ ਦੇ ਸਾਮਰਾਜ ਹੁੰਦੇ ਸਨ. ਯੂਰਪ ਵਿੱਚ ਸੰਨ 1806 ਈਸਵੀ ਵਿੱਚ 1000 ਸਾਲ ਪੁਰਾਣੇ ਪਵਿੱਤਰ ਰੋਮਨ ਸਾਮਰਾਜ ਨੂੰ ਖ਼ਤਮ ਕਰਕੇ ਹੌਲੀ ਹੌਲੀ ਉਸ ਵਿਚੋਂ ਨੇਸ਼ਨ ਜਾਂ ਕੌਮੀਅਤ ਅਧਾਰਿਤ ਦਰਜਣਾਂ ਦੇਸ਼ ਜਿਵੇਂ ਜਰਮਨੀ, ਫਰਾਂਸ, ਆਸਟਰੀਆ, ਇਟਲੀ, ਡੇਨਮਾਰਕ, ਪੋਲੈਂਡ, ਸਵਿਟਜਰਲੈਂਡ, ਸਲੋਵੇਨੀਆ, ਹੌਲੈਂਡ, ਵਗੈਰਾ ਬਣਾਏ ਗਏ .
ਸੰਨ 1922 ਵਿੱਚ, ਮਿਡਲ ਈਸਟ ਵਿੱਚ 800 ਸਾਲ ਲੰਬੇ ਉਸਮਾਨੀ ਸਾਮਰਾਜ (Ottoman empire) ਦਾ ਖ਼ਾਤਮਾ ਕਰਕੇ ਕੌਮੀਅਤ ਅਧਾਰਿਤ ਤਕਰੀਬਨ 19 ਮੁਲਕ (ਤੁਰਕੀ, ਇਰਾਕ, ਸਾਊਦੀ ਅਰਬ, ਸੀਰੀਆ, ਲਿਬਨਾਨ, ਜੌਰਡਨ, ਇਸਰਾਇਲ, ਫਲਸਤੀਨ, ਕੁਵੈਤ, ਗਰੀਸ, ਬਹਿਰੀਨ, ਕਤਰ, UAE, ਯਮਨ, ਆਰਮੀਨੀਆ, ਅਜਰਬਾਈਜਾਨ, ਜਾਰਜੀਆ ਵਗੈਰਾ) ਬਣਾ ਦਿੱਤੇ ਗਏ. 1400 ਸਾਲ ਪਹਿਲਾਂ ਜਦੋਂ ਮੱਕਾ ਨਾਮ ਦੇ ਸ਼ਹਿਰ ਵਿੱਚ ਮੁਸਲਮਾਨਾਂ ਦੇ ਪੈਗੰਬਰ ਮੁਹੰਮਦ ਦਾ ਜਨਮ ਹੋਇਆ ਸੀ ਤਾਂ ਉਸ ਵੇਲੇ ਸਾਊਦੀ ਅਰਬ ਨਾਮ ਦਾ ਕੋਈ ਦੇਸ਼ ਨਹੀਂ ਸੀ ਹੁੰਦਾ. ਜਿਵੇਂ ਇੰਡੀਆ ਨਾਮ ਦੇ ਖਿੱਤੇ ਚ ਅਸੋਕਾ ਸਾਮਰਾਜ, ਮੁਗਲ਼ ਸਾਮਰਾਜ ਵੱਡੇ ਹਿੱਸੇ ਤੇ ਰਾਜ ਕਰਦਾ ਸੀ, ਉਵੇਂ ਹੀ ਯੂਰੋਪ ਤੇ ਮਿਡਲ ਈਸਟ ਦੇ ਖਿੱਤੇ ਚ ਚ ਰੋਮਨ ਸਾਮਰਾਜ, ਗਰੀਕ ਸਾਮਰਾਜ ਤੇ ਉਸਮਾਨੀ ਸਾਮਰਾਜਾ ਦਾ ਰਾਜ ਰਿਹਾ. ਰੋਮਨ ਸਾਮਰਾਜ ਸਾਰੇ ਯੂਰੋਪ ਅਤੇ ਮਿਡਲ ਈਸਟ ਦੇ ਕਈ ਖਿੱਤਿਆਂ ਤੱਕ ਰਾਜ ਕਰਦਾ ਸੀ.
2. ਹੁਣ ਸਵਾਲ ਇਹ ਪੈਦਾ ਹੁੰਦਾ ਹੈ ਕਿ ਕੌਮ ਅਤੇ ਕੌਮੀਅਤ ਕੀ ਹੁੰਦੀ ਹੈ, ਦੇਸ਼ ਕੀ ਹੁੰਦੇ ਹਨ ਤੇ ਕਿਵੇਂ ਬਣੇ?
ਉਹ ਸਮਾਜ ਜਿਸਦੀ ਬੋਲੀ, ਸਭਿਆਚਾਰ, ਇਤਿਹਾਸ, ਨਸਲ, ਧਰਮ, ਅਤੇ ਹਿੱਤ ਸਾਂਝੇ ਹੋਣ ਉਸਨੂੰ ਕੌਮ (ਹਿੰਦੀ ਚ ਰਾਸ਼ਟਰ ਜਾਂ ਇੰਗਲਿਸ਼ ਚ ਨੇਸ਼ਨ) ਕਹਿੰਦੇ ਹਨ. ਮਿਸਾਲ ਵਜੋਂ ਅੰਗਰੇਜ, ਫਰਾਂਸਿਸੀ, ਰੂਸੀ, ਇਟਾਲੀਅਨ, ਡੱਚ, ਤੁਰਕ, ਸਪੈਨਿਸ਼, ਅਰਬ, ਕੁਰਦ, ਫਾਰਸੀ, ਪੰਜਾਬੀ, ਕਸ਼ਮੀਰੀ, ਤਮਿਲ, ਬੰਗਾਲੀ, ਸਿੰਧੀ, ਚੀਨੀ, ਪਸ਼ਤੂਨ, ਬਲੋਚ, ਜਪਾਨੀ, ਕੋਰੀਅਨ, ਥਾਈ, ਫ਼ਿਲਪੀਨੋ, ਮਰਾਠੀ, ਵਗੈਰਾ ਕੌਮਾਂ (ਰਾਸ਼ਟਰੀਅਤਾ ਜਾਂ ਨੇਸ਼ਨ) ਹਨ ਤੇ ਇੱਕ ਕੌਮੀਅਤ ਉੱਪਰ ਅਧਾਰਿਤ ਦੇਸ਼ ਨੂੰ ਕੌਮੀ ਮੁਲਕ (ਰਾਸ਼ਟਰ ਜਾਂ ਨੇਸ਼ਨ ਸਟੇਟ) ਕਹਿੰਦੇ ਹਨ. ਯੂਰਪ ਅਤੇ ਬਾਕੀ ਦੀ ਸਭਿਅਕ ਅਤੇ ਵਿਕਸਿਤ ਦੁਨੀਆਂ ਵਿੱਚ ਬਹੁਤੇ ਮੁਲਕ ਕੌਮੀਅਤ ਜਾਂ ਨੇਸ਼ਨ ਦੇ ਅਧਾਰ ਉੱਪਰ ਬਣੇ ਹੋਏ ਹਨ ਜਿਸਨੂੰ ਨੇਸ਼ਨ ਸਟੇਟ ਜਾਂ ਆਮ ਬੋਲਚਾਲ ਚ ਸਿਰਫ ਨੇਸ਼ਨ ਕਹਿ ਦਿੰਦੇ ਹਨ.
ਭਾਰਤ ਅਤੇ ਪਾਕਿਸਤਾਨ ਨਾਮ ਦੇ ਫ਼ਰਜੀ ਦੇਸ਼ਾਂ ਵਿੱਚ ਦਰਜਣਾਂ ਨੇਸ਼ਨ ਪਾਏ ਜਾਂਦੇ ਹਨ. ਸੋ ਇਹ ਫ਼ਰਜੀ ਮੁਲਕ ਬਹੁਕੌਮੀ ਦੇਸ਼ ਜਾਂ ਕੌਮਾਂ ਦੀ ਯੂਨੀਅਨ ਹਨ (union of nations). ਭਾਰਤ ਤੇ ਪਾਕਸਿਤਾਨ ਨੇਸ਼ਨ ਨਹੀਂ ਹਨ. ਬਲਕਿ ਪੰਜਾਬ, ਕਸ਼ਮੀਰ, ਸਿੰਧ, ਬਲੋਚ, ਗੁਜਰਾਤੀ, ਮਰਾਠੀ, ਤਮਿਲ, ਬੰਗਾਲੀ, ਕੰਨੜ, ਨਾਗਾ, ਵਗੈਰਾ ਅਸਲੀ ਕੌਮਾਂ ਜਾਂ ਨੇਸ਼ਨ ਹਨ. ਮਾਡਰਨ ਸਭਿਅਕ ਅਤੇ ਵਿਕਸਿਤ ਦੁਨੀਆਂ ਵਿੱਚ ਦੇਸ਼ ਕੌਮੀਅਤ ਦੇ ਅਧਾਰ ਉੱਪਰ ਬਣਾਏ ਜਾਂਦੇ ਹਨ ਜਿਵੇਂ ਯੂਰਪ ਚ ਅੰਗਰੇਜ਼ਾਂ ਦਾ ਇੰਗਲੈਂਡ, ਫ਼੍ਰੇਂਚ ਕੌਮ ਦਾ ਫਰਾਂਸ, ਜਰਮਨ ਕੌਮ ਦਾ ਜਰਮਨੀ, ਪੋਲਿਸ਼ ਕੌਮ ਦਾ ਪੋਲੈਂਡ, ਰੂਸੀ ਕੌਮ ਦਾ ਰੂਸ ਜਾਂ ਫੇਰ ਏਸ਼ੀਆ ਚ ਜਪਾਨੀ ਕੌਮ ਦਾ ਜਪਾਨ, ਚੀਨੀ ਕੌਮ ਦਾ ਚੀਨ, ਕੋਰੀਅਨ ਕੌਮ ਦਾ ਕੋਰੀਆ
ਦੁਨੀਆਂ ਚ 650 ਵੱਡੇ ਨੇਸ਼ਨ ਜਾਂ ਕੌਮਾਂ ਹਨ ਤੇ ਭਾਰਤੀ ਉਪਮਹਾਦੀਪ ਚ ਵਸਦੇ ਨੇਸ਼ਨ ਦੁਨੀਆਂ ਦੇ ਵੱਡੇ ਨੇਸ਼ਨਾਂ ਚੋਂ ਇੱਕ ਹਨ. ਹੂਨ ਚੀਨੀ , ਸਪੈਨਿਸ਼, ਐਂਗਲੋ ਸੈਕਸਨ ਅੰਗਰੇਜ, ਅਤੇ ਅਰਬੀ ਕੌਮਾਂ ਜਾਂ ਨੇਸ਼ਨ ਤੋਂ ਬਾਅਦ
ਬੰਗਾਲੀ -ਦੁਨੀਆਂ ਦਾ ਪੰਜਵਾਂ ਵੱਡਾ ਨੇਸ਼ਨ ਕੌਮ ਹੈ.
ਪੰਜਾਬੀ- ਦੁਨੀਆਂ ਦਾ ਦਸਵਾ ਵੱਡਾ ਨੇਸ਼ਨ ਕੌਮ ਹੈ.
ਮਰਾਠੀ- ਦੁਨੀਆਂ ਦਾ 13ਵਾਂ ਵੱਡਾ ਨੇਸ਼ਨ ਕੌਮ ਹੈ.
ਹਿੰਦੁਸਤਾਨੀ (ਹਿੰਦੀ ਨਹੀਂ)- ਦੁਨੀਆਂ ਦਾ 14ਵਾਂ ਵੱਡਾ ਨੇਸ਼ਨ ਕੌਮ ਹੈ.
ਤੇਲਗੂ- ਦੁਨੀਆਂ ਦਾ 15ਵਾਂ ਵੱਡਾ ਨੇਸ਼ਨ ਕੌਮ ਹੈ.
ਤਮਿਲ- ਦੁਨੀਆਂ ਦਾ 17ਵਾਂ ਵੱਡਾ ਨੇਸ਼ਨ ਕੌਮ ਹੈ.
ਗੁਜਰਾਤੀ - ਦੁਨੀਆਂ ਦਾ 24ਵਾਂ ਵੱਡਾ ਨੇਸ਼ਨ ਕੌਮ ਹੈ.
ਭੋਜਪੁਰੀ - ਦੁਨੀਆਂ ਦਾ 25ਵਾਂ ਵੱਡਾ ਨੇਸ਼ਨ ਕੌਮ ਹੈ.
ਕੰਨੜ - ਦੁਨੀਆਂ ਦਾ 29ਵਾਂ ਵੱਡਾ ਨੇਸ਼ਨ ਕੌਮ ਹੈ.
ਮਲਿਆਲਮ - ਦੁਨੀਆਂ ਦਾ 30ਵਾਂ ਵੱਡਾ ਨੇਸ਼ਨ ਕੌਮ ਹੈ.
ਉੜੀਆ- ਦੁਨੀਆਂ ਦਾ 32ਵਾਂ ਵੱਡਾ ਨੇਸ਼ਨ ਕੌਮ ਹੈ.
ਮੈਥਿਲੀ - ਦੁਨੀਆਂ ਦਾ 40ਵਾਂ ਵੱਡਾ ਨੇਸ਼ਨ ਕੌਮ ਹੈ.
ਅਵਧੀ- ਦੁਨੀਆਂ ਦਾ 46ਵਾਂ ਵੱਡਾ ਨੇਸ਼ਨ ਕੌਮ ਹੈ.
ਅਸਾਮੀ - ਦੁਨੀਆਂ ਦਾ 65ਵਾਂ ਵੱਡਾ ਨੇਸ਼ਨ ਕੌਮ ਹੈ.
ਇਸੇ ਤਰਾਂ ਹਰਿਆਣਵੀ, ਮਾਰਵਾੜੀ, ਮਗਾਹੀ, ਡੱਕਣ ਵਗੈਰਾ ਦੁਨੀਆਂ ਦੇ ਸਭ ਤੋਂ ਵੱਡੇ 100 ਨੇਸ਼ਨਾਂ ਚ ਆਉਂਦੇ ਹਨ.
1947 ਵਿੱਚ ਅੰਗਰੇਜ਼ੀ ਸਾਮਰਾਜ ਵਿਚੋਂ ਦੋ ਕੌਮੀ ਫ਼ਰਜੀ ਸਿਧਾਂਤ ਉੱਪਰ ਦੋ ਫ਼ਰਜੀ ਮੁਲਕ ਇੰਡੀਆ ਤੇ ਇਸਲਾਮਿਕ ਪਾਕਿਸਤਾਨ ਸਿਰਜੇ ਗਏ. ਜਿਵੇਂ ਬਾਕੀ ਦੁਨੀਆਂ ਵਿੱਚ ਸਾਮਰਾਜ ਖ਼ਤਮ ਕਰਕੇ ਨੇਸ਼ਨ ਜਾਂ ਕੌਮੀਅਤ ਅਧਾਰਿਤ ਦੇਸ਼ ਬਣਾਏ ਸਨ, ਉਸਤੋਂ ਉਲਟ ਅੰਗਰੇਜ਼ੀ ਸਾਮਰਾਜ ਖ਼ਤਮ ਕਰਕੇ ਹਿੰਦੂ ਅਤੇ ਮੁਸਲਮਾਨ ਧਰਮਾਂ ਨੂੰ ਦੋ ਨੇਸ਼ਨ ਜਾਂ ਕੌਮਾਂ ਮੰਨ ਕੇ ਦੋ ਮੁਲਕ ਬਣਾ ਦਿੱਤੇ ਗਏ. ਜਦਕਿ ਹਿੰਦੂ ਅਤੇ ਇਸਲਾਮ ਨੇਸ਼ਨ ਨਹੀਂ ਹਨ ਬਲਕਿ ਧਰਮ ਹਨ. ਸੋ ਭਾਰਤ ਤੇ ਪਾਕਸਿਤਾਨ ਨੇਸ਼ਨ ਅਧਾਰਿਤ ਮੁਲਕ ਨਾ ਹੋ ਕੇ ਧਰਮ ਅਧਾਰਿਤ ਮੁਲਕ ਹਨ. ਬਾਅਦ ਵਿੱਚ 1971 ਵਿੱਚ ਪਾਕਿਸਤਾਨ ਵਿਚੋਂ ਬੰਗਲਾ ਨੇਸ਼ਨ ਜਾਂ ਕੌਮੀਅਤ (ਦੁਨੀਆਂ ਦਾ 5ਵਾਂ ਵੱਡਾ ਨੇਸ਼ਨ) ਅਧਾਰਿਤ ਦੇਸ਼ ਬੰਗਲਾਦੇਸ਼ ਬਣਿਆ. ਫ਼ਰਜੀ ਦੇਸ਼ ਭਾਰਤ ਦੇ ਵੱਖ ਵੱਖ ਨੇਸ਼ਨਾਂ ਵਿੱਚ ਧਰਮ ਤੋਂ ਸਿਵਾ ਕੋਈ ਵੀ ਸਾਂਝ ਨਹੀਂ ਹੈ. ਬੱਸ ਹਿੰਦੂ ਧਰਮ ਅਤੇ ਇਸਲਾਮ ਧਰਮ ਹੀ ਭਾਰਤ ਅਤੇ ਪਾਕਿਸਤਾਨ ਨੂੰ ਇੱਕ ਦੇਸ਼ ਵਜੋਂ ਆਪਸ ਚ ਬੰਨ ਕੇ ਰੱਖਣ ਲਈ ਸਾਂਝ ਵਜੋਂ ਵਰਤਿਆ ਜਾਂਦਾ ਹੈ. ਹਿੰਦੂ ਅਤੇ ਇਸਲਾਮ ਧਰਮ ਦੀ ਅਣਹੋਂਦ ਚ ਇਹ ਦੋਨੋਂ ਨਕਲੀ ਮੁਲਕ ਇੱਕ ਸਾਲ ਵੀ ਕੱਠਾ ਨਹੀਂ ਰਹਿ ਸਕਦੇ ਅਤੇ ਯੂਰਪ ਵਾਂਗ ਨੇਸ਼ਨ ਅਧਾਰਿਤ ਦੇਸ਼ਾਂ ਚ ਵੰਡੇ ਜਾਣਗੇ ਜਿਵੇਂ ਪਾਕਿਸਤਾਨ ਚੋਂ ਬੰਗਲਾ ਨੇਸ਼ਨ ਅਧਾਰਿਤ ਦੇਸ਼ ਬੰਗਲਾਦੇਸ਼ ਬਣ ਗਿਆ ਸੀ.
3. ਭਾਰਤ ਦੇਸ਼ ਦੇ ਉਹ ਨੇਸ਼ਨ (ਕਸ਼ਮੀਰ, ਪੰਜਾਬ, ਨਾਗਾ, ਮਿਜ਼ੋ) ਜਿਹਨਾਂ ਦਾ ਧਰਮ ਹਿੰਦੂ ਨਹੀਂ ਹੈ, ਉਹ ਫੌਜੀ ਜਬਰ ਅਤੇ ਜ਼ੁਲਮ ਦੇ ਸਿਰ ਉੱਪਰ ਭਾਰਤ ਨਾਲ ਬੰਨ ਕੇ ਰੱਖੇ ਜਾਂਦੇ ਹਨ, ਅਤੇ ਇਹ ਨੇਸ਼ਨ ਆਪਣੇ ਲਈ ਯੂਰੋਪ, ਏਸ਼ੀਆ ਅਤੇ ਬੰਗਲਾਦੇਸ਼ ਵਾਂਗ ਨੇਸ਼ਨ ਅਧਾਰਿਤ ਅਜਾਦ ਮੁਲਕ ਮੰਗਦੇ ਹਨ. ਪਰ ਭਾਰਤ ਦੇ ਬਾਕੀ ਹਿੰਦੂ ਨੇਸ਼ਨਾਂ ਦੀ ਆਪਸ ਵਿੱਚ ਹਿੰਦੂ ਧਰਮ ਦੀ ਸਾਂਝ ਹੋਣ ਕਰਕੇ ਉਹ ਬਾਕੀ ਦੁਨੀਆਂ ਵਾਂਗ ਨੇਸ਼ਨ ਅਧਾਰਿਤ ਮੁਲਕ ਨਾ ਮੰਗ ਕੇ ਧਰਮ ਅਧਾਰਿਤ ਮੁਲਕ ਚ ਰਹਿ ਕੇ ਖੁਸ਼ ਹਨ. ਭਾਰਤੀ ਉਪਮਹਾਦੀਪ ਦੇ ਹਿੰਦੂ ਨੇਸ਼ਨ ਆਪਣੇ ਨੇਸ਼ਨ ਨਾਲੋਂ ਧਰਮ ਨੂੰ ਉੱਪਰ ਰੱਖਦੇ ਹਨ. ਜਦਕਿ ਮੁਸਲਮਾਨ ਨੇਸ਼ਨ ਜਿਵੇਂ ਕਸ਼ਮੀਰੀ, ਬੰਗਾਲੀ (ਬੰਗਾਲਦੇਸ਼ ਵਾਲੇ), ਸਿੰਧੀ, ਪਸ਼ਤੋ (ਪਠਾਣ ਨੇਸ਼ਨ), ਬਲੋਚ ਨੇਸ਼ਨ ਆਪਣੇ ਨੇਸ਼ਨਾਂ ਨੂੰ ਧਰਮ ਤੋਂ ਉੱਪਰ ਰੱਖਦੇ ਹਨ ਤੇ ਬੰਗਲਾਦੇਸ਼ ਵਾਂਗ ਹੀ ਆਪਣੀ ਨੇਸ਼ਨ ਦੀ ਪਛਾਣ ਉੱਪਰ ਆਪਣੇ ਅਲੱਗ ਦੇਸ਼ ਨੇਸ਼ਨ ਸਟੇਟ ਬਣਾਉਣਾ ਚਾਹੁੰਦੇ ਹਨ.
ਵਿਦਵਾਨਾਂ ਵਲੋਂ ਕੀਤੇ ਅਧਿਐਨ ਅਤੇ ਰਿਸਰਚ ਅਨੁਸਾਰ ਕਿਸੇ ਦੇਸ਼ ਵਿੱਚ ਬਹੁਕੌਮੀ (ਬਹੁਰਾਸ਼ਟਰੀ, multi national) ਭਿੰਨਤਾ ਦਾ ਹੋਣਾ ਆਰਥਿਕ ਤਰੱਕੀ ਵਿੱਚ ਰੁਕਾਵਟ ਪੈਦਾ ਕਰਦਾ ਹੈ. ਦੇਸ਼ ਦੇ ਵੱਖ ਵੱਖ ਨੇਸ਼ਨਾਂ ਦੇ ਹਿੱਤ ਆਪਸ ਵਿੱਚ ਟਕਰਾਉਂਦੇ ਰਹਿੰਦੇ ਹਨ ਤੇ ਉਹ ਆਪਸੀ ਲੜਾਈ ਵਿੱਚ ਰੁੱਝੇ ਇਸੇ ਵਿੱਚ ਸਾਰੀ ਊਰਜਾ ਤੇ ਸਾਧਨ ਖਰਾਬ ਕਰ ਦਿੰਦੇ ਹਨ. ਵੱਖ ਵੱਖ ਨੇਸ਼ਨ ਆਪਣੀ ਅਜਾਦੀ ਅਤੇ ਅਧਿਕਾਰਾਂ ਲਈ ਲੜਦੇ ਰਹਿੰਦੇ ਹਨ ਤੇ ਉਹਨਾਂ ਦੇ ਅੰਦੋਲਨ ਅਤੇ ਵਿਦਰੋਹਾ ਨੂੰ ਦੱਬਣ ਲਈ ਅਰਬਾਂ ਖਰਬਾਂ ਰੁਪਈਆ ਫੌਜ ਅਤੇ ਅਮਨ ਕਾਨੂੰਨ ਬਣਾਈ ਰੱਖਣ ਲਈ ਫੂਕਿਆ ਜਾਂਦਾ ਹੈ.
ਇਸਦੇ ਉਲਟ ਇੱਕ ਨੇਸ਼ਨ ਉੱਪਰ ਅਧਾਰਿਤ ਦੇਸ਼ ਜਾਂ ਨੇਸ਼ਨ ਸਟੇਟ ਤੇਜ ਆਰਥਿਕ ਤਰੱਕੀ ਕਰਦੇ ਹਨ. ਅਜਿਹੇ ਦੇਸ਼ਾਂ ਵਿੱਚ ਲੋਕਤੰਤਰ ਵੀ ਮਜ਼ਬੂਤ ਹੁੰਦਾ ਹੈ ਕਿਉਕਿ ਨਾਗਰਿਕ ਇੱਕੋ ਬੋਲੀ, ਕਲਚਰ, ਇਤਿਹਾਸ, ਨਸਲ ਅਤੇ ਧਰਮ ਦੇ ਹੋਣ ਕਰਕੇ ਸਿਆਸੀ ਪਾਰਟੀਆਂ ਵੀ ਵੱਖ ਵੱਖ ਫਿਰਕਿਆ ਚ ਵੰਡੀਆ ਨਹੀਂ ਹੁੰਦੀਆਂ ਤੇ ਲੋਕਾਂ ਦੇ ਮੁੱਦੇ ਜਿਵੇਂ ਆਰਥਿਕ ਤਰੱਕੀ ਅਤੇ ਸਮਾਜਿਕ ਬਰਾਬਰੀ ਉੱਪਰ ਕੰਮ ਕਰਦੀਆਂ ਹਨ.
ਕਸ਼ਮੀਰ ਅਤੇ ਪੰਜਾਬ ਵੀ ਯੂਰਪ, ਬੰਗਲਾਦੇਸ਼ ਅਤੇ ਬਾਕੀ ਦੇ ਵਿਕਸਿਤ ਦੇਸ਼ਾਂ ਵਾਂਗ ਨੇਸ਼ਨ ਅਧਾਰਿਤ ਅਜਾਦ ਮੁਲਕ ਹੋਣੇ ਚਾਹੀਦੇ ਹਨ ਪਰ ਕਸ਼ਮੀਰੀ ਹਿੰਦੂ ਅਤੇ ਪੰਜਾਬੀ ਹਿੰਦੂ ਆਪਣੇ ਨੇਸ਼ਨ ਨਾਲੋਂ ਧਰਮ ਅਧਾਰਿਤ ਦੇਸ਼ ਭਾਰਤ ਵਿੱਚ ਰਹਿਣ ਨੂੰ ਤਰਜੀਹ ਦਿੰਦੇ ਹਨ. ਪੰਜਾਬੀ ਹਿੰਦੂਆਂ ਨੇ ਤਾਂ 1951 ਅਤੇ 1961 ਦੀ ਹੋਈ ਜਨਗਣਨਾ ਵਿੱਚ ਹੀ ਆਪਣੀ ਮਾਂ ਬੋਲੀ ਹਿੰਦੀ ਲਿਖਾ ਕੇ ਆਪਣੀ ਪੰਜਾਬੀ ਕੌਮੀਅਤ ਨੂੰ ਸਦਾ ਲਈ ਅਲਵਿਦਾ ਕਹਿ ਦਿੱਤਾ ਸੀ. ਉਹ ਆਪਣੀ ਪਛਾਣ ਸਿਰਫ ਅਤੇ ਸਿਰਫ ਭਾਰਤੀ ਹਿੰਦੂ ਵਜੋਂ ਦੇਖਦੇ ਹਨ. ਉਹ ਕਦੇ ਵੀ ਪੰਜਾਬੀ ਨੇਸ਼ਨ ਸਟੇਟ ਨੂੰ ਸਪੋਰਟ ਨਹੀਂ ਕਰਨਗੇ. ਪੰਜਾਬੀ ਸਿੱਖ ਅਤੇ ਕਸ਼ਮੀਰੀ ਮੁਸਲਮਾਨ ਪੰਜਾਬੀ ਹਿੰਦੂਆਂ ਅਤੇ ਕਸ਼ਮੀਰੀ ਹਿੰਦੂਆਂ ਨੂੰ ਧੱਕੇ ਨਾਲ ਨੇਸ਼ਨ ਅਧਾਰਿਤ ਦੇਸ਼ ਦੀ ਸਪੋਰਟ ਕਰਨ ਲਈ ਮਜਬੂਰ ਨਹੀਂ ਕਰ ਸਕਦੇ. ਸੋ ਚੰਗੀ ਗੱਲ ਇਹੀ ਹੋਵੇਗੀ ਕਿ ਆਪਣੀ ਮਰਜੀ ਅਨੁਸਾਰ ਪੰਜਾਬੀ ਤੇ ਕਸ਼ਮੀਰੀ ਹਿੰਦੂ ਧਰਮ ਦੇ ਅਧਾਰ ਉੱਪਰ ਬਣਾਏ ਦੇਸ਼ ਭਾਰਤ ਚ ਹੀ ਰਹਿਣ. ਜਦਕਿ ਬੰਗਾਲੀ ਮੁਸਲਮਾਨਾਂ ਦੀ ਬੰਗਾਲੀ ਨੇਸ਼ਨ ਸਟੇਟ ਬੰਗਲਾਦੇਸ਼ ਵਾਂਗ ਪੰਜਾਬੀ ਸਿੱਖ ਅਤੇ ਕਸ਼ਮੀਰੀ ਮੁਸਲਮਾਨ ਆਪਣੇ ਨੇਸ਼ਨ ਅਧਾਰਿਤ ਵੱਖਰੇ ਮੁਲਕ ਬਣਾ ਲੈਣ.
ਖਾਲਸਤਾਨ- ਪੰਜਾਬੀ ਨੇਸ਼ਨ ਅਤੇ ਪੰਜਾਬੀ ਪਛਾਣ ਦੀ ਹੋਂਦ ਦਾ ਸੰਘਰਸ਼. ਹਿੰਦੁਸਤਾਨੀ ਸਾਮਰਾਜ ਦੇ ਝੂਠੇ ਬਿਰਤਾਂਤ ਅਤੇ ਵਿਤਕਰੇ ਦੀ ਲੰਮੀ ਗਾਥਾ
ਜਦੋਂ ਜਦੋਂ ਵੀ ਸਿੱਖ ਆਪਣੀ ਕੌਮੀ ਪਛਾਣ ਅਤੇ ਕੌਮੀ ਹੱਕਾਂ (ਪੰਜਾਬੀ ਬੋਲੀ ਅਤੇ ਸਭਿਆਚਾਰ) ਦੀ ਰਾਖੀ ਲਈ ਜਥੇਬੰਦ ਹੁੰਦੇ ਹਨ ਤਾਂ ਹਿੰਦੁਸਤਾਨੀ ਸਾਮਰਾਜ ਦੇ ਹਮੈਤੜ ਭਾਵੇਂ ਉਹ ਕਿਸੇ ਵੀ ਵਿਚਾਰਧਾਰਾ ਨਾਲ ਸੰਬੰਧ ਰੱਖਦੇ ਹੋਣ (ਸੱਜੇਪੱਖੀ ਹਿੰਦੁਵਾਦੀ, ਖੱਬੇਪੱਖੀ ਕਾਮਰੇਟ, ਸੇਕੂਲਰਵਾਦੀ, ਅੰਬੇਡਕਰਵਾਦੀ ਵਗੈਰਾ), ਸਿੱਖਾਂ ਨੂੰ ਅੱਤਵਾਦੀ, ਵੱਖਵਾਦੀ ਬਣਾ ਕੇ ਪੇਸ਼ ਕਰਦੇ ਹਨ. 1947 ਵਿੱਚ ਦੋ ਕੌਮੀ ਫ਼ਰਜੀ ਸਿਧਾਂਤ ਉੱਪਰ ਉਸਰੇ ਦੋ ਫ਼ਰਜੀ ਮੁਲਕਾਂ ਭਾਰਤ ਅਤੇ ਪਾਕਸਤਾਨ ਦੇ ਬਣਨ ਤੋਂ ਲੈ ਕੇ ਹੁਣ ਤੱਕ ਖੱਬੇਪੱਖੀ ਲਿਬਰਲ ਮੀਡੀਆ ਸਿੱਖਾਂ ਖਿਲਾਫ ਇਹ ਕੰਮ ਪੂਰੀ ਇਮਾਨਦਾਰੀ ਨਾਲ ਕਰ ਰਿਹਾ ਹੈ. 1947 ਵਿੱਚ ਭਾਰਤੀ ਯੂਨੀਅਨ ਵਿੱਚ ਤਕਰੀਬਨ 15 ਸੂਬੇ ਸਨ (ਹੁਣ 28 ਤੋਂ ਵੀ ਵਧੇਰੇ ਹਨ). ਇਹ 15 ਸੂਬੇ ਵੱਖ ਵੱਖ ਨੇਸ਼ਨਾਂ ਨੂੰ ਰਲਗੱਡ ਕਰਕੇ ਬਣਾਏ ਗਏ ਸਨ. ਇਹਨਾਂ 15 ਸੂਬਿਆਂ ਦੀ ਬਣਤਰ ਮਜੂਦਾ ਸੂਬਿਆਂ ਨਾਲੋਂ ਬਿਲਕੁਲ ਵੱਖਰੀ ਸੀ ਤੇ ਇਹਨਾਂ ਦੀ ਬਣਤਰ ਦਾ ਮੁੱਖ ਮਕਸਦ ਸਿਰਫ ਪ੍ਰਸ਼ਾਸਕੀ ਢਾਂਚਾ ਚਲਾਉਣਾ ਸੀ. ਜਦੋੰਕਿ ਮਜੂਦਾ ਸੂਬੇ ਜੋ ਕਿ ਨੈਸ਼ਨਲਿਟੀ (ਬੋਲੀ, ਕਲਚਰ, ਨਸਲ) ਦੇ ਅਧਾਰ ਉੱਪਰ ਉਸਾਰੇ ਗਏ ਹਨ ਦੀ ਸਥਾਪਨਾ ਦਾ ਮਕਸਦ ਆਪੋ ਆਪਣੀ ਨੈਸ਼ਨਲਿਟੀ (ਬੋਲੀ, ਕਲਚਰ, ਨਸਲ ਅਤੇ ਆਪਣੇ ਹਿੱਤਾਂ) ਦੀ ਹੋਂਦ ਅਤੇ ਸੁਰੱਖਿਆ ਕਰਨੀ ਸੀ.
ਨਹਿਰੂ ਜੋ ਕਿ ਇੰਗਲੈਂਡ ਵਿੱਚ ਪੜ੍ਹਿਆ ਹੋਇਆ ਇੱਕ ਤੇਜ ਦਿਮਾਗ ਵਿਦਵਾਨ ਵਿਅਕਤੀ ਸੀ, ਹਿੰਦੁਸਤਾਨੀ ਸਾਮਰਾਜ ਨੂੰ ਯੂਰਪੀ ਮੁਲਕਾਂ ਵਾਂਗ ਇੱਕ ਬੋਲੀ ਅਤੇ ਇੱਕ ਕਲਚਰ ਉੱਪਰ ਅਧਾਰਿਤ ਦੇਸ਼ ਬਣਾਉਣਾ ਚਾਹੁੰਦਾ ਸੀ. ਨਹਿਰੂ ਨੇ ਯੂਰਪ ਅਤੇ ਏਸ਼ੀਆ ਦੇ ਇਤਿਹਾਸ ਦਾ ਬਹੁਤ ਚੰਗੀ ਤਰਾਂ ਅਧਿਐਨ ਕੀਤਾ ਹੋਇਆ ਸੀ. ਨਹਿਰੂ ਨੇ ਭਾਰਤੀ ਖਿੱਤੇ ਦੇ ਇਤਿਹਾਸ ਉੱਪਰ ਪ੍ਰਸਿੱਧ ਕਿਤਾਬ "ਡਿਸਕਵਰੀ ਓਫ ਇੰਡੀਆ" ਵੀ ਲਿਖੀ ਹੈ. ਨਹਿਰੂ ਨੇ ਅਧਿਐਨ ਕੀਤਾ ਕਿ ਯੂਰਪ ਦੇ ਮੁਲਕ ਜਿਵੇਂ ਇੰਗਲੈਂਡ ਫਰਾਂਸ ਜਰਮਨੀ ਇਟਲੀ ਵਗੈਰਾ ਵੀ ਪਹਿਲਾਂ ਬਹੁਕੌਮੀ (ਮਲਟੀਨੈਸ਼ਨਲ) ਮੁਲਕ ਸਨ. ਪਰ ਹੌਲੀ ਹੌਲੀ ਇਹਨਾਂ ਮੁਲਕਾਂ ਵਿੱਚ ਘਟਗਿਣਤੀ ਕੌਮਾਂ ਉੱਪਰ ਵੱਡੇ ਨੇਸ਼ਨ ਦੀ ਬੋਲੀ ਅਤੇ ਕਲਚਰ ਥੋਪ ਕੇ ਇਹਨਾਂ ਮੁਲਕਾਂ ਨੂੰ ਇੱਕ ਬੋਲੀ, ਇੱਕ ਕਲਚਰ ਅਧਾਰਿਤ ਮੁਲਕ ਬਣਾ ਦਿੱਤਾ ਗਿਆ. ਨਹਿਰੂ ਜਾਣਦਾ ਸੀ ਕਿ ਮੁਲਕ ਦਾ ਅਧਾਰ ਇੱਕ ਬੋਲੀ ਤੇ ਇੱਕ ਕਲਚਰ ਹੁੰਦਾ ਹੈ. ਜੇ ਹਿੰਦੁਸਤਾਨੀ ਸਾਮਰਾਜ ਵਿੱਚ ਕਈ ਬੋਲੀਆਂ, ਕਈ ਕਲਚਰ ਹੋਣਗੇ ਤਾਂ ਇੱਕ ਦਿਨ ਇਹ ਫ਼ਰਜੀ ਮੁਲਕ ਯੂਰਪ ਵਾਂਗ ਬੋਲੀ ਕਲਚਰ ਅਧਾਰਿਤ ਦਰਜਣਾਂ ਮੁਲਕਾਂ ਦੇ ਰੂਪ ਵਿੱਚ ਟੁੱਟ ਜਾਵੇਗਾ. ਹਿੰਦੂ ਧਰਮ ਦੀ ਸਾਂਝ ਭਾਰਤ ਨੂੰ ਇੱਕ ਮੁਲਕ ਦੇ ਰੂਪ ਬਣਾਈ ਰੱਖਣ ਲਈ ਬਹੁਤਾ ਚਿਰ ਸਹਾਈ ਨਹੀਂ ਹੋਵੇਗੀ. ਇਹੀ ਵਿਚਾਰ ਪਾਕਿਸਤਾਨ ਵਿੱਚ ਮੁਹੰਮਦ ਅਲੀ ਜਿੰਨਾਹ ਦੇ ਸਨ (ਜੋ ਕਿ ਸੱਚ ਸਿੱਧ ਹੋਏ ਜਦੋਂ ਬੰਗਾਲੀ ਮੁਸਲਮਾਨਾਂ ਨੇ ਆਪਣੀ ਬੋਲੀ ਕਲਚਰ ਅਧਾਰਿਤ ਵੱਖਰਾ ਦੇਸ਼ ਬੰਗਲਾਦੇਸ਼ ਬਣਾ ਲਿਆ). ਇਸ ਲਈ ਨਹਿਰੂ ਅਤੇ ਜਿੰਨਾਹ ਨੇ ਪੂਰੇ ਭਾਰਤ ਤੇ ਪਾਕਸਿਤਾਨ ਵਿੱਚ ਇੱਕ ਬੋਲੀ ਹਿੰਦੀ ਅਤੇ ਉਰਦੂ ਥੋਪਣ ਦੀ ਸ਼ੁਰੂਆਤ ਕੀਤੀ. ਨਹਿਰੂ ਹਿੰਦੁਸਤਾਨੀ ਸਾਮਰਾਜ ਨੂੰ ਹਿੰਦੀ ਬੋਲੀ ਅਤੇ ਕਲਚਰ ਅਧਾਰਿਤ ਇੱਕ ਹਿੰਦੀ ਨੇਸ਼ਨ ਸਟੇਟ ਬਣਾਉਣੀ ਚਾਹੁੰਦਾ ਸੀ.
Chamkila was result of caste honour killing which is still common. How can ch@mar Sikh marry a jatt Sikh ? Gupta wouldn't say it . Are
Are you saying jatts are fine with Ch@mars marrying Jatt girls ? It's still very common in Punjab, haryana, Rajasthan, Delhi, UP . I myself know jaat girl married a chamar in UP in court marriage which girls family didn't approve of so they were plotting to kill which they did after years of waiting at someone's marriage, guy , girl , their child all killed.
Meanwhile it doesn't happen other way because same las year a jaat guy married a ch@mar girl ( works in Bangalore) and girls family did big wedding.
Also I know some other caste girls families did big weddings when they married jatav/chamar guys like Gupta girls, yadav girls etc.
And these are all stories from last year , all from cities, all known to our family.
Very well made video. End portion should be made into reels ..esp where mentioned the names of other singer/people who were killed nearby to Chamkila's death.
Chamkila was result of caste honour killing which is still common. How can ch@mar Sikh marry a jatt Sikh ? Gupta wouldn't say it . Others killings were not.
Mugle - E - Azam depicted the butcher as Hindu saviour - why do Indians see history into films?
Indians don't want to read, research and respond. Be it Bajirao Mastani or Padmavati
Only time i see someone talk about khalistan is only in national media, no one here talks about it.
I agree. Nobody talks about it out in Europe either. The media is out for blood and creating divisions in society as they did in the 80s … Shekhar Gupta doesn’t have all his facts straight… no context
Trouble is in India not Canada happily living and always seeking justice❤
Neither do you.
Is it operation Black Thunder or Blue star
Shekhar what you have said during this podcast , you should say it major forums around the world. This information which was collected by journalist/reporters like you and others like you need to be discussed in larger forums
I usually admire Shekhar for the “completeness” of his viewpoint even though I may not agree with it. On this one, I found it fall short. What is the “context” that you see lacking in the movie? Is it that terrorists had an active hand in eliminating Chamkila? Or that the series of massacres that happened around Chamkila’s and his wife’s assassinations were all connected? Or were there other angles involved? It was unclear in the video.
I am not supporting the movie - in fact, it’s better Indian moviemakers avoid making biopics or movies made on real-life incidents incidents, either contemporary or historical, as most of them end up being hagiographies or expressing a narrow point of view. Maybe because of the censor board or the fear of retribution.
Felt the same while watching the movie, but I guess that Director wanted to celebrate Chamkila and didn’t want to deviate too much from that .
Khalistan issue is not just in Canada, but US/UK/Australia and NZ. I lived in California before moving to Canada, California has lot of organized rallies. Gurudwaras in California and UK have huge posters of bhindrawale and support base for him. The only issue in Canada, khalistanis are a strong vote bank due to their concentration in Brampton and Surrey. On top, what I see is American society accepts immigrants with more open arms as compared to Canadians, who seem to practice very subtle racism. So kids of immigrants assimilate more better in US, while in Canada they end of ghettoizing in their ethnic circles and even though they are born in Canada, they are ghettoized in their ow circles.
Also, US is a very diverse country where good quality immigrants come from India, as even despite being almost impossible to get green card due to backlog, it is still best for tech. Canada sees low level of immigration, most people are unskilled or mediocre in studies.
The whole truth is of course bigger than the sum of its parts. Thank you for contributing with your first hand, on-ground knowledge.
Let us hope that serious unbiased research in the contemporary history of India is taken up while the likes of you are still around.
I think both Modi and Jaishankar are quite capable of handling the fomenting of terror by western powers, who would like to curb India from achieving its potential. Also they will be many other challenges which a strong government under Modi will be able to overcome
Manipur
@@gandhibhagat285 another problem created by western Christian conversion groups , who encourage disaffection and sow seeds of separate identity , within community that co existed for 100’s of years
Khalistan dont have Support in Punjab Today, because
Sikhs majoritily "Converted" to Christianity
But both are concerning for North Indian Hindus.
For your information most Christian converts came from hindu dalit communities. Dalits who identity as sikhs also converted in recent past but to a much lesser degree.
@@cb9461just see a simple videos all most all pastors are turban wearing Sikhs….as far as I seen RSS is more concerned about Sikhs converting to Christianity than SPGC…I have seen in media RSS doing Gharwapsi of many Punjab Christian’s into Sikhs (not Hindus which is funny because Sikhs hates RSS more than Christian missionary)
lol.yes some converted but only lower caste ppl converted
That's incorrect @cb9461 in the case of Punjab. Most converted Christians are Mazhabi Sikhs that are converting due to caste discrimination by Jat Sikhs. They have separate gurudwaras also across villages in Punjab based on caste in Sikhs and due to this lower caste Sikhs, such as Mazhabi are converting rapidly to Christianity. The Print has carried several news articles on it.
I don't have anything against Mr. Gupta's argument because, frankly, I don't know much about Punjab militancy. Chamkila might not have been killed for obscene lyrics and the movie probably got it all wrong. But what I am questioning is the counter-example Mr. Gupta mentions, that of another poet who didn't write obscene songs and still got killed. That seems like a wrong example, the correct one would be show a singer/poet who DID write obscene lyrics but did not get killed!
Great work
Situation here is worse. I would say talk about free speech for everyone not just 1 community
thanks shekhar ji i was waiting for this
Suggest books on Punjab and J&k militancy🙏🏾
Hi Pankaj, I recommend Punjab Story to start with. Shekhar Gupta himself contributed to it, and I think it offers a great, neutral perspective. I can suggest a couple of other books, but they mostly reflect only one side of the story.
Our Moon has blood clots by Rahul Pandita
I didn’t find this analysis by sir as correct. Because the movie was from chamkil’s perspective. He was not interested in politics, he wanted to sing and died. The film never conclusively says why he dies. All the encounters with seperatist people shiwn in the film is documented. However the film never ans why he was killed. The film focus was on freedom/desire to sing and success by a poor non priviledge person. Because you are go political person you think this way.
Thank you, Sir for fetching real background of the Chamkila story.
Chamkila was result of caste honour killing which is still common. How can ch@mar Sikh marry a jatt Sikh ? Gupta wouldn't say it .
When you say Indian films , you mean Bollywood, aren’t you?
There are large section of Indians who hardly watch any Bollywood movies.
Hindi cinema is a better term
movie is about free speech n expression being shut down by different power entity. It avoids taking political stance to avoid drowning the actual message.
Calling it caste honour killing is not politics but truth.
कोई आश्चर्य नहीं कि पंजाब से संबंधित विषय होने के कारण शेखर जी इस पर गहराई से चर्चा करते हैं
when you read - it sounds insincere & odd
U r right. I am stunned bcz I never accept that some one would make movie on low level singer chamkila. He destroyed and mocked every relationship of society
Put chamara de hero. Kps Gill ne changa kita twadi dhee da fuda paad ke
Why Should India Be Divided into Multiple Nation-States
India (Republic of India) didn't exist before 1947. Italy didn't exist before 1861. Turkey didn't exist before 1922, Germany didn't exist before 1871, Saudi Arabia didn't exist before 1932 and so on. Concept of Countries was invented in Europe in the 18th century. Before the invention of the concept of countries, there were only empires and kingdoms everywhere around world. Germany, France, Italy, Austria, Denmark, Poland, Switzerland, Slovenia, Netherlands, lechesiten etc were created after fall of 1000 yrs old Holy Roman empire in 1806. Italy and Germany were created in 1861 and 1871 by merging various small kingdoms of Italian and German nationality. Similarly all European countries were created based on their respective nationalities after the fall of empires and kingdoms across Europe.
After the fall of the 600 yrs long Ottomans empire in 1922, many countries were created based on their nationalities.Saudi Arabia didn't exist When Prophet Muhammad was born in Mecca.Turkey was created in 1923 and Saudi Arabia was created in 1932 after the fall of Ottomans Empire in 1922. Europe and Middle East was united under various empires and kingdoms for most of the history just like India. India was the name for the region east to river Indus. It was never a country before 1947 but a region or subcontinent where various empires and kingdoms existed just like in Europe, Middle East or other parts and continents of world.
Now the question is what is nation and nationality? A nation is a society that shares a common language, culture, and history and has shared interests. For example English, German, Italian, Turkish, French, Russian, Dutch, Spanish, Arabs, Persian, Kurds, Japanese, Korean, Punjabi, kashmiri, Marathi, Bengali, Tamil, Malyalam, Thai etc are nations and a country based on single nation or nationality or where a single nationality dominates culturally, politically, in economy and military is called a nation state. Most countries in Europe or 'civilised world' are based on single nationalities and are nation states or simply called nations.
There are dozens of nations within India and Pakistan. And hence India and Pakistan are union of nations or multinational countries. Nations are Punjab, Kashmir, sindh, Baluchistan, Gujarat, Bengal, Maharashtra, Tamilnadu etc. And in modern civilised world countries are created on basis of nationality like the countries in Europe (England, France, Germany, Poland, Norway, Sweden, Croatia etc) or in Asia (Korea, Japan, China,Thailand, Philippines etc) and Bangladesh etc are countries based on nationalities.
Among the 650 major nations in the world, the nations in the union of India are one of the largest nations in the world. After Han Chinese Mandrain, Spanish, Anglo Saxons English, and Arabic
Bengali - world's 5th largest nationality
Punjabi- 10th largest nationality in world
Marathi- 13th largest nationality in world
Hindustani- 14th largest
Telugu- 15th largest nationality
Tamil- 17th largest nationality in world
Gujarati- 24th largest nationality in world
Bhojpuri- 25th largest
Kannada- 29thth largest
Malyalam- 30th largest
Oriya- 32nd largest
Maithili- 40th largest
Awadhi- 46th largest
Assamese- 65th largest
Haryanvi, Marwari, Magahi, Deccan, etc in top 100 nationalities of world.
(Hindi, Urdu are not nationalities but artificial languages developed from Hindustani language and imposed on some nations in some regions, with only few native speakers. These regions have their own nationalities and languages. Hindustani is a nationality in western Uttar pradesh with Hindustani as native language).
Republic of India was created in 1947 out of the British Indian empire on the basis of two nations bogus theory. Two nations were assumed as Islam and hindusim. But in reality, Islam and Hinduism are not nations. India and Pakistan were not created based on nationalities (unlike in rest of civilised world) but on two nation (Islam Hinduism) bogus theory. Hence, these countries are based on religions.
On the other hand, Bangladesh is a nation state which was created on the basis of Bangla nationality in 1971 (5th biggest nationality in world). No other nation in the British empire (except Bangla nation) got sovereignty and independence. The sovereignty of all nations changed hands from British empire to two newly created empires based on religions. British empire just transferred ownership rights in 1947.
Three predominant civilisations in Republic of India, Indo Aryans, Dravidian and Sino Tibetic ( North East nations in the Republic of India) don't share anything although the first two civilisations share religion hence religion is the biggest binding force of the country followed by Military Power which is used to occupy non Hindu nations (Punjab, Kashmir, Nagaland, Mizoram, Meghalaya) with the country. Most of Hindus in Indian subcontinent prefer religion over their nationalities unlike muslims (Kashmiri, Bangla, Baluch, Sindhi, Pashto) who identify themselves with their nationalities and even support nation states like Bangladesh.
According to research, Higher ethnic or national diversity within a country negatively affects economic growth through conflict between interests of various nations or ethnicities (Don't confuse the ethnic or national diversity with the multiculturalism in west due to migration, the migrants mix with diverse society and become part of nationality of the host country and work for the interests of the dominant nationality).
High 'nationality or ethnic' Diversity correlates with low GDP per capita.
Strong democracy correlates with ethnic or national homogeneity.
Punjab and Kashmir should be a free countries based on Punjabi and Kashmiri nationalities like Bangladesh. But Hindu Punjabis, Hindu Kashmiris don't want to leave unions of india so Punjabi Sikhs, or Kashmiri muslims can't force them to follow to support the idea of Nation-States. Hindu Punjabis, who had deserted Punjabi language in 1951 and 1961 census by declaring Hindi as their mother tongue would never support a Punjabi nation state. They support a Indian state based on the Hindu religion.
Similarly, Bengali Hindus and Kashmiri Hindus don't support Bangla nation state Bangladesh and Azad Kashmir and want to live in India which is based on Hinduism. So Punjabi Hindus, Kashmiri Hindus and Bengali Hindus are free to stay in their respective countries based on religions. But similar to Bangla Muslims of East Pakistan, who created Bangla nation state Bangladesh without Indian Bengali Hindus, Sikhs have the right to create Azad Punjab (a Punjabi nation state) without Punjabi Hindus and Punjabi Muslims (and Azad Kashmir without Kashmiri Hindus). As simple as that
Punjab is rotting just look at where they have gone down export preparedness index of niti aayog and ease of doing business
Check Gujarat where children are dying because of malnutrition
@@Kim-ej2xmnowhere in India are children dying because of malnutrition
@@amithabv1060tell this niti aayog
@@Kim-ej2xmno where in gujart people are dying cause of malnutrition lol. Every poor gujarti gets free food.
@@amithabv1060Gujarat is among worst for Dalits and tribals. There is nothing outside cities in Gujarat
Nobody talk about relation of akalis and Jan sangh responsible for most of problems in punjab ..... they did the nurakushti ....
🎉
Another good edition from guptaji. ❤
Pash wrote against khalistani, so he was killed . He was a family friend
he was a vulgar bastard... he also barked against sikhi and their gurus.. nor did he understand the sikh struggle, he deserved what he got
Why this print becoming or already became GODI media.....enjoy life & love .. fight for truth....
Khalistanis : Imagine a guy getting kicked out of his own house by gangsters, the guy then goes to his friends house for shelter, but after a few years, he gets support from the same gangsters and then demands he should be included in the will of his friend's father.
overseas Khalsitanis : Imagine the guy A getting kicked out of his house along with his brother B, the brother B then goes to USA while A goes to his friends house, The Brother B in the USA then demands, his brother A should be included in the friends' father's will even though A does not want it.
Why Should India Be Divided into Multiple Nation-States
India (Republic of India) didn't exist before 1947. Italy didn't exist before 1861. Turkey didn't exist before 1922, Germany didn't exist before 1871, Saudi Arabia didn't exist before 1932 and so on. Concept of Countries was invented in Europe in the 18th century. Before the invention of the concept of countries, there were only empires and kingdoms everywhere around world. Germany, France, Italy, Austria, Denmark, Poland, Switzerland, Slovenia, Netherlands, lechesiten etc were created after fall of 1000 yrs old Holy Roman empire in 1806. Italy and Germany were created in 1861 and 1871 by merging various small kingdoms of Italian and German nationality. Similarly all European countries were created based on their respective nationalities after the fall of empires and kingdoms across Europe.
After the fall of the 600 yrs long Ottomans empire in 1922, many countries were created based on their nationalities.Saudi Arabia didn't exist When Prophet Muhammad was born in Mecca.Turkey was created in 1923 and Saudi Arabia was created in 1932 after the fall of Ottomans Empire in 1922. Europe and Middle East was united under various empires and kingdoms for most of the history just like India. India was the name for the region east to river Indus. It was never a country before 1947 but a region or subcontinent where various empires and kingdoms existed just like in Europe, Middle East or other parts and continents of world.
Now the question is what is nation and nationality? A nation is a society that shares a common language, culture, and history and has shared interests. For example English, German, Italian, Turkish, French, Russian, Dutch, Spanish, Arabs, Persian, Kurds, Japanese, Korean, Punjabi, kashmiri, Marathi, Bengali, Tamil, Malyalam, Thai etc are nations and a country based on single nation or nationality or where a single nationality dominates culturally, politically, in economy and military is called a nation state. Most countries in Europe or 'civilised world' are based on single nationalities and are nation states or simply called nations.
There are dozens of nations within India and Pakistan. And hence India and Pakistan are union of nations or multinational countries. Nations are Punjab, Kashmir, sindh, Baluchistan, Gujarat, Bengal, Maharashtra, Tamilnadu etc. And in modern civilised world countries are created on basis of nationality like the countries in Europe (England, France, Germany, Poland, Norway, Sweden, Croatia etc) or in Asia (Korea, Japan, China,Thailand, Philippines etc) and Bangladesh etc are countries based on nationalities.
Among the 650 major nations in the world, the nations in the union of India are one of the largest nations in the world. After Han Chinese Mandrain, Spanish, Anglo Saxons English, and Arabic
Bengali - world's 5th largest nationality
Punjabi- 10th largest nationality in world
Marathi- 13th largest nationality in world
Hindustani- 14th largest
Telugu- 15th largest nationality
Tamil- 17th largest nationality in world
Gujarati- 24th largest nationality in world
Bhojpuri- 25th largest
Kannada- 29thth largest
Malyalam- 30th largest
Oriya- 32nd largest
Maithili- 40th largest
Awadhi- 46th largest
Assamese- 65th largest
Haryanvi, Marwari, Magahi, Deccan, etc in top 100 nationalities of world.
(Hindi, Urdu are not nationalities but artificial languages developed from Hindustani language and imposed on some nations in some regions, with only few native speakers. These regions have their own nationalities and languages. Hindustani is a nationality in western Uttar pradesh with Hindustani as native language).
Republic of India was created in 1947 out of the British Indian empire on the basis of two nations bogus theory. Two nations were assumed as Islam and hindusim. But in reality, Islam and Hinduism are not nations. India and Pakistan were not created based on nationalities (unlike in rest of civilised world) but on two nation (Islam Hinduism) bogus theory. Hence, these countries are based on religions.
On the other hand, Bangladesh is a nation state which was created on the basis of Bangla nationality in 1971 (5th biggest nationality in world). No other nation in the British empire (except Bangla nation) got sovereignty and independence. The sovereignty of all nations changed hands from British empire to two newly created empires based on religions. British empire just transferred ownership rights in 1947.
Three predominant civilisations in Republic of India, Indo Aryans, Dravidian and Sino Tibetic ( North East nations in the Republic of India) don't share anything although the first two civilisations share religion hence religion is the biggest binding force of the country followed by Military Power which is used to occupy non Hindu nations (Punjab, Kashmir, Nagaland, Mizoram, Meghalaya) with the country. Most of Hindus in Indian subcontinent prefer religion over their nationalities unlike muslims (Kashmiri, Bangla, Baluch, Sindhi, Pashto) who identify themselves with their nationalities and even support nation states like Bangladesh.
According to research, Higher ethnic or national diversity within a country negatively affects economic growth through conflict between interests of various nations or ethnicities (Don't confuse the ethnic or national diversity with the multiculturalism in west due to migration, the migrants mix with diverse society and become part of nationality of the host country and work for the interests of the dominant nationality).
High 'nationality or ethnic' Diversity correlates with low GDP per capita.
Strong democracy correlates with ethnic or national homogeneity.
Punjab and Kashmir should be a free countries based on Punjabi and Kashmiri nationalities like Bangladesh. But Hindu Punjabis, Hindu Kashmiris don't want to leave unions of india so Punjabi Sikhs, or Kashmiri muslims can't force them to follow to support the idea of Nation-States. Hindu Punjabis, who had deserted Punjabi language in 1951 and 1961 census by declaring Hindi as their mother tongue would never support a Punjabi nation state. They support a Indian state based on the Hindu religion.
Similarly, Bengali Hindus and Kashmiri Hindus don't support Bangla nation state Bangladesh and Azad Kashmir and want to live in India which is based on Hinduism. So Punjabi Hindus, Kashmiri Hindus and Bengali Hindus are free to stay in their respective countries based on religions. But similar to Bangla Muslims of East Pakistan, who created Bangla nation state Bangladesh without Indian Bengali Hindus, Sikhs have the right to create Azad Punjab (a Punjabi nation state) without Punjabi Hindus and Punjabi Muslims (and Azad Kashmir without Kashmiri Hindus). As simple as that
Shekhar jee, namaskaar!
We need Gurdass Maan to speak up about Chamkila. Were they not contemporaries?
When you immigrate to a foreign nation, you leave your domestic politics at the check in at your home airport. If you bring it with you to the nation you move to, things will not end well for you. Be it Khalistani separatism or militant Hindu nationalism.
MR Shekhar forgot that there was no such wave of khalistan in Punjab or Canada after 90s and before farmer protest of 2019, all these khalistan agenda came in light when your godi media started picturizing the protest and protesters as khalistanis just to defend their beloved PM. From that very day people like nijjar got their exposure and started giving speeches on social media to youth of Punjab that this how India treats you and honestly every Punjabi felt humilated from that day because everyone started questioning their nationlism and that's how this khalistan came in light again, think about it, no-one even talks about the khalistan before 2019 and the so called social media nationalists still playing that dirty games of commenting lassi and khalistani in every post of Sikh on social media. at the end the one who has played with fire and now don't know how to stop that fire is GODI MEDIA.
Sick of BJP-generated scripts.
Get some honest journalism, guys.
Indian media sucks, honestly.
It was caste honour killing. He can't say it
Diljit Dosanjh himself is a sympathiser of Khalistanis. What would you expect from a film he is working in.
This religious extremism is a feature of Punjabi society and has identity at its roots. Punjabis of Pakistan are Islamic sunni radicals and Sikhs of Indian punjab are khalistani radicals. Hindus are really not dominant in punjab and they identify themselves with larger Indian society so they are fine whereas Muslims and Sikhs identify themselves exclusive to India. Sikhs of Punjab think that they have to assert their religious identity in an extreme manner and in opposition to Hinduism otherwise they would be subsumed within the Hindu society. Sikh scriptures are interpreted in a way which pits sikhism against the Hinduism. Unless and until Sikh religon itself is not reformed, the K problem cannot be solved. Example - just look at the way SGPC handles blasphemy lynchings, it never condemns them and also there is no condemnation of such incidents within the larger sikh society.
The logic is simple :
Muslims are separate nation - got Pakistan.
Sikhs are separate nation - wants Khalistan.
Punjabi Pakistanis identify themselves with turks and Arabs and don't own their Indian/Hindu heritage and similarly these K-sikhs have identity crisis.
great high level analysis.
reform you say...Hinduism is the most racist caste system religion and India by far the most racist country but you spewing BS against Sikhism, lets clean up our own house first brother
@@harryvining8006 lol stfu troll there's no such thing as caste in Hinduism.
Chamkila was result of caste honour killing which is still common. How can ch@mar Sikh marry a jatt Sikh ? Gupta wouldn't say it .
@@harryvining8006chamkila was killed because he married a Jatt Sikh . It was honour killing.
Bollyweed 😂
This guy cannot keep his head straight and in 1 position while talking, really distracts the viewer.
You should do a tutorial on “how to give a very biased review”. You seem to be an expert in that 😂
You should have added BJP too.
This was an interesting episode, this situation with Canada and some parts of Bollywood is a classic example of since I was never effected by something so it never happened and is not happening & you know both Imtiaz and Canadian politicians especially Trudu (this is a deliberate mistake) & his party both will be called progressives.
He conveniently ignored the killing of Hindus not only in Punjab but in Haryana also, when he tried to give eg all of them are either local Hindus or labourers from Bihar (mostly hindu).
Majority of Sikhs dies in police encounters, when they were attacking police and public with 47.
It is called Guerilla War fare and freedom struggle - killing innocence is not what they should have done but in a freedom movement innocent victims are just part of the struggle... what do you know about it this war please enlighten me?
uninformed Hindus of Inida. unfortunately
@@harryvining8006Why Should India Be Divided into Multiple Nation-States
India (Republic of India) didn't exist before 1947. Italy didn't exist before 1861. Turkey didn't exist before 1922, Germany didn't exist before 1871, Saudi Arabia didn't exist before 1932 and so on. Concept of Countries was invented in Europe in the 18th century. Before the invention of the concept of countries, there were only empires and kingdoms everywhere around world. Germany, France, Italy, Austria, Denmark, Poland, Switzerland, Slovenia, Netherlands, lechesiten etc were created after fall of 1000 yrs old Holy Roman empire in 1806. Italy and Germany were created in 1861 and 1871 by merging various small kingdoms of Italian and German nationality. Similarly all European countries were created based on their respective nationalities after the fall of empires and kingdoms across Europe.
After the fall of the 600 yrs long Ottomans empire in 1922, many countries were created based on their nationalities.Saudi Arabia didn't exist When Prophet Muhammad was born in Mecca.Turkey was created in 1923 and Saudi Arabia was created in 1932 after the fall of Ottomans Empire in 1922. Europe and Middle East was united under various empires and kingdoms for most of the history just like India. India was the name for the region east to river Indus. It was never a country before 1947 but a region or subcontinent where various empires and kingdoms existed just like in Europe, Middle East or other parts and continents of world.
Now the question is what is nation and nationality? A nation is a society that shares a common language, culture, and history and has shared interests. For example English, German, Italian, Turkish, French, Russian, Dutch, Spanish, Arabs, Persian, Kurds, Japanese, Korean, Punjabi, kashmiri, Marathi, Bengali, Tamil, Malyalam, Thai etc are nations and a country based on single nation or nationality or where a single nationality dominates culturally, politically, in economy and military is called a nation state. Most countries in Europe or 'civilised world' are based on single nationalities and are nation states or simply called nations.
There are dozens of nations within India and Pakistan. And hence India and Pakistan are union of nations or multinational countries. Nations are Punjab, Kashmir, sindh, Baluchistan, Gujarat, Bengal, Maharashtra, Tamilnadu etc. And in modern civilised world countries are created on basis of nationality like the countries in Europe (England, France, Germany, Poland, Norway, Sweden, Croatia etc) or in Asia (Korea, Japan, China,Thailand, Philippines etc) and Bangladesh etc are countries based on nationalities.
Among the 650 major nations in the world, the nations in the union of India are one of the largest nations in the world. After Han Chinese Mandrain, Spanish, Anglo Saxons English, and Arabic
Bengali - world's 5th largest nationality
Punjabi- 10th largest nationality in world
Marathi- 13th largest nationality in world
Hindustani- 14th largest
Telugu- 15th largest nationality
Tamil- 17th largest nationality in world
Gujarati- 24th largest nationality in world
Bhojpuri- 25th largest
Kannada- 29thth largest
Malyalam- 30th largest
Oriya- 32nd largest
Maithili- 40th largest
Awadhi- 46th largest
Assamese- 65th largest
Haryanvi, Marwari, Magahi, Deccan, etc in top 100 nationalities of world.
(Hindi, Urdu are not nationalities but artificial languages developed from Hindustani language and imposed on some nations in some regions, with only few native speakers. These regions have their own nationalities and languages. Hindustani is a nationality in western Uttar pradesh with Hindustani as native language).
Republic of India was created in 1947 out of the British Indian empire on the basis of two nations bogus theory. Two nations were assumed as Islam and hindusim. But in reality, Islam and Hinduism are not nations. India and Pakistan were not created based on nationalities (unlike in rest of civilised world) but on two nation (Islam Hinduism) bogus theory. Hence, these countries are based on religions.
On the other hand, Bangladesh is a nation state which was created on the basis of Bangla nationality in 1971 (5th biggest nationality in world). No other nation in the British empire (except Bangla nation) got sovereignty and independence. The sovereignty of all nations changed hands from British empire to two newly created empires based on religions. British empire just transferred ownership rights in 1947.
Three predominant civilisations in Republic of India, Indo Aryans, Dravidian and Sino Tibetic ( North East nations in the Republic of India) don't share anything although the first two civilisations share religion hence religion is the biggest binding force of the country followed by Military Power which is used to occupy non Hindu nations (Punjab, Kashmir, Nagaland, Mizoram, Meghalaya) with the country. Most of Hindus in Indian subcontinent prefer religion over their nationalities unlike muslims (Kashmiri, Bangla, Baluch, Sindhi, Pashto) who identify themselves with their nationalities and even support nation states like Bangladesh.
According to research, Higher ethnic or national diversity within a country negatively affects economic growth through conflict between interests of various nations or ethnicities (Don't confuse the ethnic or national diversity with the multiculturalism in west due to migration, the migrants mix with diverse society and become part of nationality of the host country and work for the interests of the dominant nationality).
High 'nationality or ethnic' Diversity correlates with low GDP per capita.
Strong democracy correlates with ethnic or national homogeneity.
Punjab and Kashmir should be a free countries based on Punjabi and Kashmiri nationalities like Bangladesh. But Hindu Punjabis, Hindu Kashmiris don't want to leave unions of india so Punjabi Sikhs, or Kashmiri muslims can't force them to follow to support the idea of Nation-States. Hindu Punjabis, who had deserted Punjabi language in 1951 and 1961 census by declaring Hindi as their mother tongue would never support a Punjabi nation state. They support a Indian state based on the Hindu religion.
Similarly, Bengali Hindus and Kashmiri Hindus don't support Bangla nation state Bangladesh and Azad Kashmir and want to live in India which is based on Hinduism. So Punjabi Hindus, Kashmiri Hindus and Bengali Hindus are free to stay in their respective countries based on religions. But similar to Bangla Muslims of East Pakistan, who created Bangla nation state Bangladesh without Indian Bengali Hindus, Sikhs have the right to create Azad Punjab (a Punjabi nation state) without Punjabi Hindus and Punjabi Muslims (and Azad Kashmir without Kashmiri Hindus). As simple as that
absolutely fake 84 Genocide 150000 Sikhs murders kharlra unveiled 25000 alone
Few more films exists but that may not be suit The Prints business model 😊
Gupta Ji normally doesn't use such harsh words ever but his passion is clearly visible on this subject. Loved the episode, clearly laying out the facts for the ones willing to see. I might just make a donation for this episode of CTC.
if you don't care about them they do t care about you
Even film 'TAJ MAHAL' Was fakery - though songs were superb - it was never built by Shah Jahan
The support for a separate nation "khalistan" has lost traction in India. But it still has support among some constituents in foreign nations like Canada and the US. Punjab is plagued by unemployment, drug mafia tearing apart the social fabric and futures of the younger generation, youth's fascination with going abroad for studying and working, thus resulting in the loss of our resources and manpower to the state as well as to the nation. This is compounded by a fragmented and weakening polity. Disillusionment and discontent has generated a vacuum for newer social and political forces to fill. It was to fill this empty space that Amritlal Singh was being propped up by foreign powers and gained huge support in a short span of time. It is high time our political leaders, community figures and policymakers tend to prioritise solutions to this menace otherwise the problem can spiral out of control just like the 1970s and 1980s.
Why do Sikhs hate BJP so much?
It is truly refreshing to see a logical, honest, and unbiased comment in section in what is otherwise a swamp of vitriol spewed by brainwashed ignoramuses. I believe that the Punjab problem can only be solved with the concerted efforts of both the centre and the state. But for this to work, there needs to be acceptance of the fact that a problem exists in the first place. The State is too strategic to be ignored for long, and unemployed, disillusioned youth are all it will ever take to stoke the flames of the past. Moreover, in an environment as tense as the one in India at the moment, Sikhs outside of Punjab will likely have it a lot worse than those in the State. Just like the tens of thousands who suffered in Delhi and elsewhere during the pogrom.
😂 ediot i live in punjab or you we want khalisthan we have strong mindset one day we will create our different sikh land
Let me keep it plain and simple....India is very powerful and will crush any kind of terrorism. Ghanta nahi kabad payenge ye khalistani. We are giving undue Importance to these non trivial trouble makers. Let our security forces take care of it. Journalists should stop making these issues look like atom bombs for their TRPs/viewership
If Canada is a trouble infested country then what is india??
INDIA FIGHTS THEM CANADA WELCOME THEM
Usa also
at 6:35 you state that the separatist movement "has the fullest political support" in Canada. Can you please elaborate? Freedom of speech does not equate to support. The same freedom of speech exists in the US and UK and a small group in these countries does speak up about their objectives. What is the basis for your statement that only Canada provides 'the fullest political support' for a separatist movement?
Boycott Franklin Templeton
you can get shekhar out of Punjab.. but not vice versa 😂 well Shekhar this time you are wrong.. Modi was angered by farm protests globally (soft power) and this time he started this useless killing..
Fake news
I hope imtiaaz ali watches this review.
The Chamkila film is bad. We Punjabis can't take it because the film has got Diljit, who ofc is wonderful no doubt.
Chamkila was result of caste honour killing which is still common. How can ch@mar Sikh marry a jatt Sikh ? Gupta wouldn't say it .
All Sikhs are by nature Khalistani as in our daily Ardas Sikhs ask for Raj, and it was zhe best Raj in the world so we are simply asking for this Khalsa Raj back as it existed before india
Truth served on a platter.
Jatts and castiesm
Please make a video about Punjab debt crisis issue
Over simplifying the militancy of Punjab is the sin of this film.
Chamkila was result of caste honour killing which is still common. How can ch@mar Sikh marry a jatt Sikh ? Gupta wouldn't say it .
Glitters are precious in some form or the other. ✍️✍️✌️✌️🙏🙏
Vote for Rahul Gandhi and make India Hindu free
Isn’t your distillation of the film also damn simplistic and convenient to your narrative? Come on, the movie is not a thriller or a whodunnit. And btw, it blames everyone, not just 1 group of people or just because of 1 reason. Be more nuanced while criticising art!
No community in India has got justice. We are banana republic
Why Should India Be Divided into Multiple Nation-States
India (Republic of India) didn't exist before 1947. Italy didn't exist before 1861. Turkey didn't exist before 1922, Germany didn't exist before 1871, Saudi Arabia didn't exist before 1932 and so on. Concept of Countries was invented in Europe in the 18th century. Before the invention of the concept of countries, there were only empires and kingdoms everywhere around world. Germany, France, Italy, Austria, Denmark, Poland, Switzerland, Slovenia, Netherlands, lechesiten etc were created after fall of 1000 yrs old Holy Roman empire in 1806. Italy and Germany were created in 1861 and 1871 by merging various small kingdoms of Italian and German nationality. Similarly all European countries were created based on their respective nationalities after the fall of empires and kingdoms across Europe.
After the fall of the 600 yrs long Ottomans empire in 1922, many countries were created based on their nationalities.Saudi Arabia didn't exist When Prophet Muhammad was born in Mecca.Turkey was created in 1923 and Saudi Arabia was created in 1932 after the fall of Ottomans Empire in 1922. Europe and Middle East was united under various empires and kingdoms for most of the history just like India. India was the name for the region east to river Indus. It was never a country before 1947 but a region or subcontinent where various empires and kingdoms existed just like in Europe, Middle East or other parts and continents of world.
Now the question is what is nation and nationality? A nation is a society that shares a common language, culture, and history and has shared interests. For example English, German, Italian, Turkish, French, Russian, Dutch, Spanish, Arabs, Persian, Kurds, Japanese, Korean, Punjabi, kashmiri, Marathi, Bengali, Tamil, Malyalam, Thai etc are nations and a country based on single nation or nationality or where a single nationality dominates culturally, politically, in economy and military is called a nation state. Most countries in Europe or 'civilised world' are based on single nationalities and are nation states or simply called nations.
There are dozens of nations within India and Pakistan. And hence India and Pakistan are union of nations or multinational countries. Nations are Punjab, Kashmir, sindh, Baluchistan, Gujarat, Bengal, Maharashtra, Tamilnadu etc. And in modern civilised world countries are created on basis of nationality like the countries in Europe (England, France, Germany, Poland, Norway, Sweden, Croatia etc) or in Asia (Korea, Japan, China,Thailand, Philippines etc) and Bangladesh etc are countries based on nationalities.
Among the 650 major nations in the world, the nations in the union of India are one of the largest nations in the world. After Han Chinese Mandrain, Spanish, Anglo Saxons English, and Arabic
Bengali - world's 5th largest nationality
Punjabi- 10th largest nationality in world
Marathi- 13th largest nationality in world
Hindustani- 14th largest
Telugu- 15th largest nationality
Tamil- 17th largest nationality in world
Gujarati- 24th largest nationality in world
Bhojpuri- 25th largest
Kannada- 29thth largest
Malyalam- 30th largest
Oriya- 32nd largest
Maithili- 40th largest
Awadhi- 46th largest
Assamese- 65th largest
Haryanvi, Marwari, Magahi, Deccan, etc in top 100 nationalities of world.
(Hindi, Urdu are not nationalities but artificial languages developed from Hindustani language and imposed on some nations in some regions, with only few native speakers. These regions have their own nationalities and languages. Hindustani is a nationality in western Uttar pradesh with Hindustani as native language).
Republic of India was created in 1947 out of the British Indian empire on the basis of two nations bogus theory. Two nations were assumed as Islam and hindusim. But in reality, Islam and Hinduism are not nations. India and Pakistan were not created based on nationalities (unlike in rest of civilised world) but on two nation (Islam Hinduism) bogus theory. Hence, these countries are based on religions.
On the other hand, Bangladesh is a nation state which was created on the basis of Bangla nationality in 1971 (5th biggest nationality in world). No other nation in the British empire (except Bangla nation) got sovereignty and independence. The sovereignty of all nations changed hands from British empire to two newly created empires based on religions. British empire just transferred ownership rights in 1947.
Three predominant civilisations in Republic of India, Indo Aryans, Dravidian and Sino Tibetic ( North East nations in the Republic of India) don't share anything although the first two civilisations share religion hence religion is the biggest binding force of the country followed by Military Power which is used to occupy non Hindu nations (Punjab, Kashmir, Nagaland, Mizoram, Meghalaya) with the country. Most of Hindus in Indian subcontinent prefer religion over their nationalities unlike muslims (Kashmiri, Bangla, Baluch, Sindhi, Pashto) who identify themselves with their nationalities and even support nation states like Bangladesh.
According to research, Higher ethnic or national diversity within a country negatively affects economic growth through conflict between interests of various nations or ethnicities (Don't confuse the ethnic or national diversity with the multiculturalism in west due to migration, the migrants mix with diverse society and become part of nationality of the host country and work for the interests of the dominant nationality).
High 'nationality or ethnic' Diversity correlates with low GDP per capita.
Strong democracy correlates with ethnic or national homogeneity.
Punjab and Kashmir should be a free countries based on Punjabi and Kashmiri nationalities like Bangladesh. But Hindu Punjabis, Hindu Kashmiris don't want to leave unions of india so Punjabi Sikhs, or Kashmiri muslims can't force them to follow to support the idea of Nation-States. Hindu Punjabis, who had deserted Punjabi language in 1951 and 1961 census by declaring Hindi as their mother tongue would never support a Punjabi nation state. They support a Indian state based on the Hindu religion.
Similarly, Bengali Hindus and Kashmiri Hindus don't support Bangla nation state Bangladesh and Azad Kashmir and want to live in India which is based on Hinduism. So Punjabi Hindus, Kashmiri Hindus and Bengali Hindus are free to stay in their respective countries based on religions. But similar to Bangla Muslims of East Pakistan, who created Bangla nation state Bangladesh without Indian Bengali Hindus, Sikhs have the right to create Azad Punjab (a Punjabi nation state) without Punjabi Hindus and Punjabi Muslims (and Azad Kashmir without Kashmiri Hindus). As simple as that
Except Brahmins because it's Brahmin republic
@@Q_QQ_Q How did Maharastra Brahmin got justice after riots on them after Gandhi's death? This is not Brahmin republic but Ambedkar republic. Where only SC-ST false cases work.
@@deadlyninja8391 brahmin bhagao desh bachao....hazaro saalo se india ka satyanash mara hai brahmino ne
Canada: Pakistan of the west.
Still better than lindu rashtra 😅
Khalistan Zindabad. Sikhs never accept the rule of Brahmans⚔️ We will fight for sovereignty and we will succeed 💪
Mahatma Gandhi of Indian Journalism: Shekhar Gupta
Are you making fun of his hair
Shekharji forgets about Hindu killings by either Pakistanis or Khalistanis or Kashmir muslims
made up rubbish talk about hindu mobs responsible for Sikh Genocide 84 and only window colony the world has ever seen
Shekhar Ji U Rock
Till delhi ruling govt does not fulfill the promises done to punjab and sikhs since 1947…. Nothing is going to solve..by suppressing forcefully will only bring back the retaliation much stronger… u can keep tagging them terrorist, khalistani , separatist … it does not matter.
Brother, during partition, Sikhs had to make a choice between Hindus and Muslims. It is not that Sikhs did not petition the British to give them a separate Sikhistan but it was not possible due to hard demographic realities on the ground. Before partition, Sikhs, on their own, were NOT in the majority in any of the districts of the British Punjab. Even in princely states, apart from one Faridkot, they were not in the majority on their own anywhere. Muslims were in majority in Western Punjab (roughly corresponding to Pakistani Punjab of today), and the Hindus were in majority on their own in East Punjab and Hill States (roughly corresponding to present day Haryana and Himachal respectively). In Central Punjab (roughly corresponding to Indian Punjab state of today), no community was in the majority on their own. So, in Central Punjab, Sikhs decided which way it would go, and the choice was not difficult. In June 1947, when the decision to partition India was taken and Sikhs were presented a choice to choose between India and Pakistan... on one side, there were Muslims who had already begun to massacre Sikhs in West Punjab starting January 1947, with intensity increasing particularly from March 1947; whereas on the other side, there were Hindus with whom they had roti-beti ka rishtaa since forever. After all, Sikhs had originated from Hindus. All Sikh Gurus were essentially born in Hindu families. There was no third choice and out of the two options available Sikhs chose Hindus because they were a natural choice. Sikhs could not have gone with Muslims for many historical reasons.
After independence, there was some delay in carving out a separate Sikh majority state, but eventually, it was carved out for them. During the Punjabi Sooba movement, the Sikh leadership reiterated many times that they would stop at having a separate Sikh majority state... and won't demand more autonomy... but then reneged on that promise. After Punjabi Sooba came Anandpur Sahib Resolution, and then that turbulent time of 1980s which took development of Punjab decades behind. The demand for a separate sovereign homeland is impractical. Punjab/Khalistan would never be practical. Its position would be worse than that of Bhutan or Nepal. No natural resources, no coal, no steel, no oil, and no coast either. What it would become is a frustratingly landlocked proxy battlefield between India and Pakistan.
What should Sikhs be more concerned about is the preservation of Sikhism in Punjab. Due to infighting and dirty power-politics of SGPC and its radical approach, people are losing faith in Sikhism and rapidly converting to Christianity. Surprisingly, and in a way, giving a hint that it is controlled by foreign powers, SGPC is largely silent on mass conversions to Christianity in Punjab. SGPC's focus is on deriding Hindus while missionaries are pulling the rug under their feet. The number of amritdhaari Sikhs has decreased almost by half in just one decade. Many turban wearing people with Singh in their name are actually Christians now, including former CM Charanjit Singh Channi. Aap pairon k neechay say jameen khisak rahi hai aur aap ko pataa bhi nahin.
Thanks for such long reply… but ur not even close to reality. So time and sikhs will decide what thy want.
@DikshaK-lo5sf , Sikhs have chosen already. They made their choice in 1947. They made another choice to go the secessionist way in 1984, and Punjab became a laggard in economic development. We all have seen results of that choice. No more of this business now. If you're so hell-bent on Khalistan, then carve one out in British Columbia and another in Ontario. If Pakistan agrees, then carve a few enclaves in Pakistani Punjab as well. It ain't gonna happen in India, bro.
@@DikshaK-lo5sftum kuchh nahi dicide kar sakte kyunki tumhaari gaand mein dum nahi hai .Jab tak apni limit mein rahoge tab tak theek hai warna tumhari gaand ki bandook bana degi Hindustan ki Government.
Man mentions “upper caste success stories” in Punjabi music back then. Please name names. Because most of the bigger names back then were either Mir Alam’s (current status OBC, I believe), or SCs. Jatts came very late to the scene. Also, man mentions 90s as a “bloody time” for Punjab, pointing to the militancy, forgets to mention government sponsored lookalikes responsible for much of the bloodshed, and we know nobody will mention the indiscriminate police tortures that Sikh youth saw in that time. A whole generation wiped.
Yes Sikhs faced a lot which is known but Chamkila was result of caste honour killing which is still common. How can ch@mar Sikh marry a jatt Sikh ? Gupta wouldn't say it .
@@Q_QQ_Q what sources do you have to say this? Besides a bias that is visible
Sikh and Khalistan are synonymous as considerable number of Sikhs support Khalistan movment. Recent Farmers agitations are not spread other than Punjab. Only Punjab Khalistani group only disturbed Delhi in the name Farmers.
You mean Khotistan.
@@tamashbeen6610No, he meant Khalistan. You Indians are Khotas
Don’t blame all People. They are our brothers.
In india people call. Go to pakistan and in Canada people call to indians go to India
Dear sekhar gupta, 140 cr Indians don't give a fuck for just 1.5 crore beard and turban.
Why are you wasting your time here then?
Yes we do they are our brothers.
The reason you have to come over and have to comment here shows how important it is and yes that 1.5 crore were the bread asket of the country for decades that gave strength to your father who then was able to have a dick head like you.
I didn't watch the video at all. Just commenting on the thumbnail and they are not by brother they can be your brother. I don't wanna be associated with them.
@@avikmallyayou did not watch the video but have time to comment! Wonder why a bhakt logic! Get a life dude!
Don't use the word upper caste, just say they were jatts.
Jatt Sikhs are upper caste. But He can't say it was honour killing
India has occupied illegally punjab and oppression of sikh dissidents even abroad has grown exponentially
Oye bhikhari Pakistani ...Lahore belong to hindu and Sikhs....
You guys did 47 partitioned punjab...sikhs never demanded pakistan or divided punjab...you guys further divided punjab ...we lost our chandigarh.... no other states have shared capital but unfortunately India never accepted us as are part this nation....
"who is you guys"??? btw Punjab was not the only state that was split, Sindh also got screwed over which is mostly hindus.
@@pario850 hindu mahasabha and muslim league stooges of British accepted two nations theory on religious basis don't think that was wrong
Those Punjabi Sikhs or ethnic Indians born out of India don't really see themselves moving to India to live. Fine for a holiday and sometimes even that is testing.
I have yet to meet one person who wants a Khalistan. I would seriously love to chat w one.
If India is so great, why has the number of Indians moving out of India been increasing for the past 50 years.
I am coming round to the thinking that the current Indian government is looking for a convenient scapegoat.
In the Nijjar murder, there is evidence of India paying agents to kill citizens of those countries. SG would do well to ask why is it acceptable for India to export terrorism.
Pyare amarjeet ji, If we accept India has paid to kill nijjar then what is the issue he was indeed a terrorist. It would be better for your Sikh community in Canada to manage it better. Do you know that 8 of top 10 wanted criminal in BC are sikhs. Instead of doing hard work for sikhs are famous, they are indulging in crime.
Indian govt. provided evidence of Nijjar providing funds and other assistance for carrying out terror acts on Indian soil. For example the Mohali attack in 2022. Just imagine the opposite situation where India harbors individuals accused by Canadian govt of causing terror attacks.
Chamkila was caste honour killing, not religious
I did not hear the word Khalistan even once between Punjab descendants in Canada. It is of course true that I saw other Indian descendants calling them as such and I have been in Canada more then 2 decades. The same goes for USA. I think it is more correct if Shekharji castigates the others calling them as such. Also it appears Trudeau was right, and it was India who acted like a petulant child trying to hide a wrongdoing.
😂😂😂😂funny
Are you Serious 😂
Bro where do you get your stuff from? It's crayyyy
Bro is not fooling anybody.
You are such a kid, who are these people who damaging hindu temples. Don't say they did it by themselves.
Shekhar ji’s analysis and views about Canada are absolutely nonsensical and devoid of intelligent knowledge.Its highly nonsensical to portray Canada encouraging terrorists and Khalistanis.Hope you compare the shameless hatred and violence being encouraged around your very secular and liberal society.
Of course Canada is encouraging terrorists . Why the hell were they portraying Nijjar as an innocent plumber ?
Nijjar wasnt terrorist. stop your nonsense. Canadian Khalistan protestors are fighting a legal battle. They dont have terrorist Camps in Canada or neither they are funding any terrorist organization in Punjab.
Sir you are walking library. Mass Respect !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Haha, Gourav, you are too kind. Thank you for watching, and supporting our journalism...best wishes, Shekhar