Mastering the art of Cross-Examination: Practical tips with law - Justice Ved Parkash Sharma

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 25 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 23

  • @shekhartalashilkar7063
    @shekhartalashilkar7063 2 роки тому +2

    Nicely explained insights of Cross Examination. Thank you🌹🙏

  • @ramajayamassociates
    @ramajayamassociates Рік тому +1

    Excellent sir and thanks for u r point, i am. From chennai high court lawyer

  • @RuchiSharma-sq6oq
    @RuchiSharma-sq6oq 7 місяців тому +1

    Nice explanation 🎉

  • @adityatripathy8868
    @adityatripathy8868 2 роки тому +1

    The simplicity and the pace of the explanations was just Super. Even as a doctor I understood everything. Gratitude.

  • @rambaharinadh2912
    @rambaharinadh2912 2 роки тому +1

    Excellent sir

  • @adityatripathy8868
    @adityatripathy8868 2 роки тому +2

    Very good discussion.

  • @saviocharles6809
    @saviocharles6809 2 роки тому +1

    Very good inputs

  • @bjrao61
    @bjrao61 2 роки тому +2

    Good subject

  • @satishsood3829
    @satishsood3829 9 місяців тому +1

    Sir, Thanks a lot.

  • @dharamdadhichi2926
    @dharamdadhichi2926 2 роки тому +1

    Future generations of lawyers will be indebted to your initiative to bring such lectures to them. Highly indebted to hon'ble Justice saahb and CLC team.

  • @nikhil_mahajan685
    @nikhil_mahajan685 Рік тому +1

    Thank you Sir and the entrie CLC team for such great videos. 👍🙏

  • @user-cz1zm7mi8m
    @user-cz1zm7mi8m Рік тому +2

    Practical questions and answers is necessary to put only explantion is not important

  • @shivakumarjagirdar3543
    @shivakumarjagirdar3543 Рік тому +1

    SIR vilkas charthdhi sir please when attachment Raising ;petition is maintanble which stage is applicable please take up class on subject of Excution proceedings order 21 of cpc

  • @mohitsharma8890
    @mohitsharma8890 Рік тому +1

    How to mark the passage from 161 CrPC statement for the purpose of contradiction, if during cross examination witness completely rejects his 161 CrPC statement saying "I don't know what police has written, this is not the statement I gave, police have completely changed my version"

  • @shivakumarjagirdar3543
    @shivakumarjagirdar3543 Рік тому

    Sir please take up the class Expert judge use the all paractioners LAW,ADVocates,Sir in os,E.P. in Appeal stage ,ARBITRAtiom procedings a specialy in E.P. procedings RAising Attachement procedings

  • @vijayakumarpoovar8890
    @vijayakumarpoovar8890 2 роки тому +3

    Good lecture. Yet some more clarity is required about cross examination of witnesses by prosecution in respect of S-154 Evidence Act. Normally after making the witnesses hostile the Public Prosecutor just reads the statements of hostile witnesses available in their 161 crpc before them and get admitting the occurrence from their mouth. Now the court says that witnesses admitted the occurrence and court can give conviction. Is it allowed as per S -154 of Evidence Act?

    • @dharamdadhichi2926
      @dharamdadhichi2926 2 роки тому

      Read 154 (2)

    • @dharamdadhichi2926
      @dharamdadhichi2926 2 роки тому

      However relying on 161 statements for conviction is wrong and illegal. It must be immediately protested by the defense counsel

  • @anujkkkkk
    @anujkkkkk 2 роки тому +1

    Excellent lecture

  • @rambaharinadh2912
    @rambaharinadh2912 4 місяці тому

    100% correct

  • @chrisreay77
    @chrisreay77 6 місяців тому +1

    Very helpful sir
    As my brother by name Mr Philip Reay msde his wife to give false fabricated evidence at 10 acmm court ms Marlyn Gomes teacher at presidency College of my advocate is mr PR Bhat
    Need all public advise support from legal Lumineers
    Thank you sir Very much

  • @RuchiSharma-sq6oq
    @RuchiSharma-sq6oq 7 місяців тому

    🎉😊😊

  • @prasantb1238
    @prasantb1238 3 місяці тому

    This Christian doesnot know who is the father of his Jesus Christ and pointing fingers at age old religion/ way of life. :P