Why Were Vikings So Much Better At Fighting?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 16 лют 2019
  • What made vikings so much better at fighting than others? Why were the vikings superior? In today's animated educational and historical video?
    🔔 SUBSCRIBE TO US ► ua-cam.com/users/theinfograp...
    📹 MAKE VIDEOS LIKE OURS
    Get access to over 600,000 ready-to-use photos, illustrations, templates, effects, fonts, brushes and more! ► bit.ly/Elements-InfographicsShow
    🔖 MY SOCIAL PAGES
    Facebook ► / theinfographicsshow
    Twitter ► / theinfoshow
    💭 SUGGEST A TOPIC
    www.theinfographicsshow.com
    📝 SOURCES:
    pastebin.com/5LUGcL1N

КОМЕНТАРІ • 4,1 тис.

  • @TheInfographicsShow
    @TheInfographicsShow  5 років тому +747

    Who were in your opinion the best warriors in history?

    • @ionxAqxclan
      @ionxAqxclan 5 років тому +4

      Lol

    • @Syrxi1
      @Syrxi1 5 років тому +34

      The best are the ones who know how to fight... I guess..?

    • @Gabrong
      @Gabrong 5 років тому +23

      S U B S C R I B E T O P E W D I E P I E they could also make a video comparing these too. just maybe, maybe They Should Not Put Horns On Helmets...

    • @zakalon123
      @zakalon123 5 років тому +56

      The Samurai or the Shaolin warriors, The Korean Hwarang-Do were very good as well.
      Vikings were not as good as ny other warriors of the time. They were beaten by the Irish and the Saxons when they stopped fighting internecine wars and banded together to fight the vikings.
      If anything it was the sneaky vikings who the most successful the unscrupulous ones who broke there vows etc etc and anyone can do that.
      Vikings were cowardly lowlifes. Not as brave as this video would make them out.

    • @HatzajaOfDaggerspine
      @HatzajaOfDaggerspine 5 років тому +23

      I think samurais were amazing warriors, I dont think the best, but I would argue Miyamoto Musashi would be one of the greatest warriors of all time.

  • @Steph-sk3xb
    @Steph-sk3xb 4 роки тому +1824

    Imagine being the Viking that figured out churches are full of gold and people that can't fight.

    • @AD-df5tm
      @AD-df5tm 4 роки тому +246

      His name was Ragnar and he basically became the most famous viking ever for figuring it out lol
      (If you want to believe he was a real person that is)

    • @zeka7812
      @zeka7812 4 роки тому +118

      @@AD-df5tm no doubt he was a real person, but his fame actually came from raiding england and france

    • @indianslave1547
      @indianslave1547 4 роки тому +28

      @@zeka7812 Paris too

    • @huginmunin8253
      @huginmunin8253 4 роки тому +16

      It was more common with silver in churches not gold in those times

    • @isarex88
      @isarex88 4 роки тому +23

      @@zeka7812 It is not proven he was a real person. It might actually be multiple persons.

  • @evaristegalois6282
    @evaristegalois6282 5 років тому +4522

    “Why were the Vikings so much better at fighting?”
    _Thor is typing..._

    • @appleapplepie2504
      @appleapplepie2504 5 років тому +47

      Evariste Galois thor is a god, not a viking.

    • @wudakid12-59
      @wudakid12-59 5 років тому +105

      Apple Applepie Thor is a Viking god

    • @user-vn7ce5ig1z
      @user-vn7ce5ig1z 5 років тому +85

      Orion The Lord> Thor is a Viking god
      Thor was a _Norse_ god; not all Norse were Vikings.

    • @thatoneslavefromcraigslist6032
      @thatoneslavefromcraigslist6032 5 років тому +18

      @@user-vn7ce5ig1z yeah some people think of Norse as Vikings although not all of them were Vikings. Thanks for getting that out there

    • @jaydesanchez2441
      @jaydesanchez2441 5 років тому +1

      Lol! LMAO

  • @filiptomic3423
    @filiptomic3423 5 років тому +2788

    saying "according to BBC"
    makes it less believable for me

    • @funnyguy5746
      @funnyguy5746 5 років тому +34

      Very true

    • @SkikyroStudios
      @SkikyroStudios 5 років тому +82

      How? The BBC is extremely credible

    • @bitajoanilzaalencar988
      @bitajoanilzaalencar988 5 років тому +3

      Rude

    • @savagehippy3834
      @savagehippy3834 5 років тому +1

      @@bitajoanilzaalencar988 how

    • @bosshoggjdkk5211
      @bosshoggjdkk5211 5 років тому +45

      Prelusion ! HA HA HA wow you should be a stand up comedian. That is one of the funniest things I have ever heard. Whew you would make millions can I be your manager straight up?

  • @HotElectricBand
    @HotElectricBand 5 років тому +1674

    Horned helmets, vikings in finland, Refering to russia before it existed, yeah dont trust this video

    • @paavoilves5416
      @paavoilves5416 5 років тому +115

      I'm not sure if us Finns really were vikings in similar fashion as Scandinavians but I do know that there has been found more viking swords in Finland than in Denmark and we're just finding more and more. It's also a fact that Finnish tribes raided Sweden and other nearby countries. We also did lots of trade with Scandinavians and Novgorodians.

    • @meginna8354
      @meginna8354 5 років тому +70

      @@paavoilves5416 no, Finns were never Vikings, they're a completely different thing.

    • @paavoilves5416
      @paavoilves5416 5 років тому +57

      @@meginna8354 Finns were never vikings (because only norse seafarers can be called vikings) but did basically same things, just in a smaller scale and focused more on trade than raiding (even though Finns did raid Novgorod, Sweden and possibly other places a lot around years 1000-1200)

    • @meginna8354
      @meginna8354 5 років тому +22

      @@paavoilves5416 Litterally everyone did raiding,, literally individuals of every ethnic group did raiding. are you referring to finnic pirates from Estonia that were mentioned in Norse sources?

    • @paavoilves5416
      @paavoilves5416 5 років тому +24

      @@meginna8354 No, I'm referring to Karelian and Tavastian tribes. If I remember right, Savonians and Bjarmians raided norse tribes and Novgorod at some point too. And yes, most tribal peoples raided during the viking age. Viking means nothing more than a seafarer/raider.

  • @zhongliangcai602
    @zhongliangcai602 5 років тому +3147

    The vikings did not have horned helmets

    • @johnwolgast7753
      @johnwolgast7753 5 років тому +226

      No they didn’t have horns on their helmets. That was made up after the vikings time.

    • @StartouchArts
      @StartouchArts 5 років тому +320

      Nor were they hulking brutes. Real vikings were incredibly average in build.

    • @dampsomsatan
      @dampsomsatan 5 років тому +145

      horned helmets where used by pagans in scotland in ceremonial events. vikings used helmets but not with horns in them. its a myth.

    • @aubreyreed5046
      @aubreyreed5046 5 років тому +32

      @@dampsomsatan nope the only evidence we have is a rock carving of Gods wearing horns. (wood for horns would break down with age. Also every helmet found has no sign for horns.)

    • @EyelessEntity
      @EyelessEntity 5 років тому +50

      ​@@aubreyreed5046 Horned helmets most certainly existed, although during the Scandinavian bronze age. If they were in use it was likely for ceremonial use. However I think that archaeologists are sometimes overly obsessed with practicality in their analyses; meanwhile modern man keeps using poorly designed tools and inventions which I'm sure future archaeologists will say could never have been used in a practical sense.

  • @omegapocalypse3648
    @omegapocalypse3648 5 років тому +504

    Oh god. Just imagine having to battle Vikings on skis

    • @liandrysanguishinshin7955
      @liandrysanguishinshin7955 5 років тому +46

      OMEGAPOCALYPSE the nazis did... when they were conquering Norway there were Norwegians with machine guns on skis, that’s one of the reasons they lasted so long.

    • @omegapocalypse3648
      @omegapocalypse3648 5 років тому +9

      Haha. That’s great

    • @Hydrastic-bz5qm
      @Hydrastic-bz5qm 5 років тому +3

      HTTYD?

    • @Usammityduzntafraidofanythin
      @Usammityduzntafraidofanythin 5 років тому +13

      Viking: "I am up the hill! I have the high ground. Here I come, foolish victim!"
      *victim dodges*
      Victim: "Now you are down the hill."
      Viking: "Hahaha correct!"
      Victim: "And you must lose your skis to climb up the hill again."
      Viking: "No! Wrong. Fighting uphill is disadvantageous. Instead, I will climb up the hill sideways. Just... slowly... wait for me. Don't run! Aw..."

    • @danverryn6740
      @danverryn6740 5 років тому +10

      Viking on skis were a real thing. They were called birkebeiner or "birch feet". It allowed them to traverse long distances during the winter quickly and quietly.

  • @71Dana
    @71Dana 4 роки тому +566

    "According to one source", wow, that is some solid research.

    • @jasontodd2533
      @jasontodd2533 3 роки тому +24

      I dont see you getting millions of views. So remind us why you're so much more knowledgeable....

    • @Venom-gl5gw
      @Venom-gl5gw 3 роки тому +110

      @@jasontodd2533 just cuz u get views don’t mean ur reliable

    • @71Dana
      @71Dana 3 роки тому +81

      @@jasontodd2533 Though I am Scandinavian, I never stated that I was more knowledgeable.
      I am unfamiliar with the concept that "Views equals factual accuracy".
      So how many views does a "Flat Earth" channel need before it becomes true?

    • @seraby7151
      @seraby7151 3 роки тому +7

      Me with my research papers lol

    • @brent5045
      @brent5045 3 роки тому +1

      @@71Dana it only becomes true once you believe in it

  • @joeyk3134
    @joeyk3134 5 років тому +101

    No horned helmets.
    They commonly only fought if they thought they could win, were extremely mobile, and didn't fear death

    • @gort7361
      @gort7361 5 років тому +1

      There is no proof though, but I still doubt they had them.

    • @nachfullbarertrank5230
      @nachfullbarertrank5230 4 роки тому +5

      @@gort7361 I mean, there's no proof they wore horned helmets in battle, so they practically didn't

    • @TypicalIndian1981
      @TypicalIndian1981 3 роки тому +2

      Well that’s why they are called barbarians being the one to defeat Rome which is the most devestating defeat for them

    • @prolly2stoned420
      @prolly2stoned420 2 роки тому +1

      That’s the best fight to fight. Wouldn’t want to fight a losing fight lol

    • @waitwhat3547
      @waitwhat3547 Рік тому +1

      @@TypicalIndian1981 I mean not really, the most devastating defeat rome faced was mostly to Goths in the west and Turks in the east, latter which ended the roman empire completely when they conquered Istanbul

  • @BlizzJaster
    @BlizzJaster 5 років тому +150

    "Let me tell you the TRUTH about the vikings..." Shows a cartoon with horn helmet and double bitted war axes...

  • @halocrandsuits
    @halocrandsuits 5 років тому +582

    Just gonna add That: Vikings actually had Chainmails, iron helmets, AS Well as they travelled to America...

    • @fuhduh2544
      @fuhduh2544 5 років тому +43

      BUT THE TV TOLD ME THEY WORE STUDDED LEATHER AND HORNS REEEEEEEE

    • @seal3427
      @seal3427 5 років тому +2

      No they did not it was only in the end of the viking era when they needed better gear to raid well defenced citiz and most viking had quit being viking bc they could afford

    • @fuhduh2544
      @fuhduh2544 5 років тому +16

      @@seal3427 they did have them if they could afford them. If they couldn't then they'd use cheaper armor like gambesons. Regarding helmet, they would always prioritize it over chainmail. If your history is as bad as your grammar I'm really concerned. Also yes, in the late viking age, most of them would quit going "viking" and focus more on trade.

    • @seal3427
      @seal3427 5 років тому +5

      @@fuhduh2544 no most vikings did not use nothing but hide armor and a helmet as armor and i wrote wrong in the last sentance i ment to write not afford, i'm swedish so we learnd alot about vinkings in school and i learnd alot from museums

    • @fuhduh2544
      @fuhduh2544 5 років тому +13

      @@seal3427 any sources you can direct me to? "Hide" armor sounds pretty dumb honestly, hide and leather don't offer as much protection as a gambeson or just thick clothing. Also rich vikings would have a full set of gambeson, chainmail, helmet, sword, spear, axe and seaxe, and of course a shield. You saying "did not use nothing but hide armor and a helmet" doesn't make any sense at all. They used to attack less defended targets but they still liked to stay alive so it really makes no sense for them to only use "hide" armor. They weren't savages, they didn't dress like in movies, they used brightly coloured clothes and were particularly clean for the standards of the time. Again, show me your sources, and I'll admit I was wrong and you were right.
      btw "hide" is organic matter, it decomposes with the passing of the years, so I doubt there's any in museums. The only viking pieces of armor you can find in museums are chainmail and helmets

  • @emilw115
    @emilw115 5 років тому +325

    Also most vikings believed that there own death were allready predetermined, so they were less scared of dying. (Sry for the spelling mistakes)

    • @SkrrtRonalds
      @SkrrtRonalds 5 років тому +11

      they wanted to die with a sword or axe in hand.

    • @K0bbii
      @K0bbii 5 років тому +25

      If you didn´t die in battle you would not get sent to Valhöll which is where Óðinn lives , Getting there meant you´d get to fight to the death every day and be raised up to party every night

    • @MyouKyuubi
      @MyouKyuubi 4 роки тому +8

      Well, if time is an actual thing, and not just a human-made concept, then your death is indeed predetermined. :P

    • @cherryberry7024
      @cherryberry7024 4 роки тому +1

      believe in predestined!so were not afraid to die! it was a honour!.

    • @onjo6746
      @onjo6746 4 роки тому +3

      They're also broken on For Honor,which is pretty mental

  • @PajamaJazama
    @PajamaJazama 4 роки тому +159

    7:35 You put a viking on Finland but not Denmark? O_o Clearly this is another person just citing things without proper understanding

    • @huginmunin8253
      @huginmunin8253 3 роки тому +2

      Swedish vikings where in Finland. Finland was only a province back then and later on unite the rest of the tribes there. But thats why its named Finland and not some other name cause it all started there

    • @harald7309
      @harald7309 3 роки тому +13

      He means that denmark is WAY more viking related then lil old neighbour finland.

    • @huginmunin8253
      @huginmunin8253 3 роки тому +1

      144p Lobster yes, but it was vikings that lived and created Finland. Finland was not the entire country as it is today, back then it was a small part in the southern region and there vikings lived there ofcourse some of the finno-ugric people to, my point is there where alot of vikings there so old Finland is very related to vikings. And if you read eddan you can read about greater svitjod that goes from Uppland to Finland and Novgorod.

    • @harald7309
      @harald7309 3 роки тому +2

      @@huginmunin8253 bro everything Swedish schools said that there were Vikings in the coastal areas of the south of Sweden south/south-west areas of Norway and whole Denmark

    • @huginmunin8253
      @huginmunin8253 3 роки тому

      @@harald7309 I dont know what you want to say with that, i have not mentioned anything about schools in Sweden and what they teach about vikings. What do you meen by that comment? No offense just want to know what i should reply

  • @notsweatygoat
    @notsweatygoat 5 років тому +713

    If you terrify Russia, that means something.

    • @yarugatyger1603
      @yarugatyger1603 5 років тому +44

      Novgorod in the middle ages was a Viking state.

    • @Oxley016
      @Oxley016 5 років тому +44

      There wasn’t a Russia, just the remnants of the mongol empire and a couple of its tributary states

    • @jaggeriscoughmedicine
      @jaggeriscoughmedicine 5 років тому +2

      No there was but very weak.

    • @rojavabashur6455
      @rojavabashur6455 5 років тому +41

      @@Oxley016 Russia is literally named after the Vikings, Rus is Viking in russian.

    • @kasperknutsen8283
      @kasperknutsen8283 5 років тому +3

      @@rojavabashur6455 no rus where baltics kind of *viking* not real vikings.

  • @ifyousubtomeyouwillgainabs6072
    @ifyousubtomeyouwillgainabs6072 5 років тому +1291

    Because they played minecraft pvp daily.

  • @paullutze9307
    @paullutze9307 4 роки тому +45

    Viking Video starting with horned helmets ... already a testament to how much research you did

  • @volodymyrbondarenko9471
    @volodymyrbondarenko9471 5 років тому +247

    dislike for the fact you did zero research and just used the BBC article as a source and for calling Kievan Rus "Russia".

    • @shtorka_v_dome
      @shtorka_v_dome 4 роки тому +4

      Lol. Butthurt of offended ukrainian clown nobody cares.
      Русские - истинные русы и наследники Руси =)

    • @shtorka_v_dome
      @shtorka_v_dome 4 роки тому +2

      ​@@topsesXD Kiev has never been a true Russian city. It was captured by Rus' Prince Oleg in 882 from the Khazar Khaganate. True first Rus' cities are Novgorod, Izborsk, Belozersk, Staraya Ladoga, Staraya Russa, Rostov, Murom, Smolensk, Polotsk and all of them are located on territory of Russian plain in Russia.

    • @hellrazor9860
      @hellrazor9860 4 роки тому +1

      @@topsesXD she is typical imperial chauvinist)))

    • @jjjj-cy3vz
      @jjjj-cy3vz 4 роки тому +5

      you realize he used the term Russia simply because most people watching this would not have even known it was called kievan rus? you say kievan rus to most people and they are pretty dumbfounded as to where it is.

    • @ReubenSempleJones
      @ReubenSempleJones 3 роки тому

      Probably because most the audience would have no idea what it was. For instance England was split into a bunch of smaller Kingdoms when the Vikings invaded. In fact the English identity existed because of the vikings as the Anglo Saxons united to kick out the vikings.

  • @robinsinpost
    @robinsinpost 5 років тому +598

    Because they were so strong because of all the rowing they did. Very good exercise.
    Row a little bit across the world and you will notice the difference.

    • @kasperknutsen8283
      @kasperknutsen8283 5 років тому +9

      True and climate

    • @seal3427
      @seal3427 5 років тому +17

      They where not strong they where most avrage built and short

    • @seal3427
      @seal3427 5 років тому

      But the people in europe was skinny

    • @kasperknutsen8283
      @kasperknutsen8283 5 років тому +30

      @@seal3427 lol nope! That is asia, africa, south and north america son

    • @seal3427
      @seal3427 5 років тому +6

      @@kasperknutsen8283 son... the average viking whas 1.73 cm in norway and sweden is it 1.81 right know. SON

  • @steakknives
    @steakknives 5 років тому +734

    Sounds like someone did research by looking up some UA-cam videos.

    • @Busicmox
      @Busicmox 5 років тому +50

      Exactly, this video is pure clickbait and most of it is wrong.

    • @WinterCrystal1009
      @WinterCrystal1009 5 років тому +8

      A lot of what he's saying is true... He's just briefly skimming the surface because otherwise it'd be a documentary. It took me a while for my knowledge of Norse Myth, and I only got so far in.

    • @Spills51
      @Spills51 4 роки тому +5

      Hah, You just realizing that. Literaly a dozen vids on this channel have misinformation.
      I actually think this is they worst channel hands down thast attempts to pass what they say as fact but get SO MUCH WRONG ON SO MANY SUBJECTS/VIDEOS.
      BUT HEY< THEY GOTTA GET THEM VIDS OUT AND $$ IN...WHO CARES ABOUT ACCURACY...😎

    • @nachfullbarertrank5230
      @nachfullbarertrank5230 4 роки тому +2

      @lil crispy explain yourself do you know anything about Norse history or Vikings...or anything for that matter

    • @standardamerican2490
      @standardamerican2490 4 роки тому +1

      This is why I like simple history more.

  • @4bigcrews726
    @4bigcrews726 4 роки тому +262

    Fun fact Viking's didn't wear horn helmets

    • @TheSwedishDude95
      @TheSwedishDude95 4 роки тому +40

      Fun fact Vikings did'nt look like bodybuilders either.

    • @raylovelace8588
      @raylovelace8588 4 роки тому

      just become BORINGFACT.

    • @aaronross9326
      @aaronross9326 3 роки тому +8

      It would be cooler if they did though

    • @dreadcthulhu5
      @dreadcthulhu5 3 роки тому +9

      @@aaronross9326 No, it wouldn't. Having horns on your helmet is like having long hair. Don't give an enemy something to hold onto for leverage.

    • @nuclearsenshi
      @nuclearsenshi 3 роки тому

      they barely wear helmets

  • @TheLoneTerran
    @TheLoneTerran 3 роки тому +12

    One thing that was semi-recently discovered was that Viking warriors often used weapons made from primitive steel. I'm sure not all, but many groups would collect the bones of particularly fierce enemies that had been slain and would sometimes add the bone into the forging process in hopes of infusing the weapon with some of the fallen warriors ferocity and skill. What this really did was infuse some carbon into the weapon, strengthening the iron a bit which helps quite a lot.

  • @summersolstice255
    @summersolstice255 5 років тому +594

    It's because Vikings grew up playing Minecraft and not Fortnite.

    • @feexy41
      @feexy41 5 років тому +5

      Elmer Fudd Eating Grilled Cheese Real Viking's play Minecraft

    • @jackmorgan1710
      @jackmorgan1710 5 років тому +5

      I'd have gone with Dark Souls.

    • @pqbdwmnu
      @pqbdwmnu 5 років тому

      Notch Pearson just distributed it to the rest of the world

    • @sheittinaowens3199
      @sheittinaowens3199 5 років тому

      Reindeer hide armour helps

    • @anantshanker2945
      @anantshanker2945 5 років тому +3

      Skyrim or Dark Souls makes more sense

  • @jlhudson7359
    @jlhudson7359 5 років тому +269

    *ACCORDING TO THE BBC*

  • @Ben-xv2sl
    @Ben-xv2sl 4 роки тому +34

    Nobody :
    Vikings : Weapons are part of my religion

  • @robtennant98
    @robtennant98 4 роки тому +26

    Who’s here after assassins creed Valhalla trailer?

    • @gam3rgeree416
      @gam3rgeree416 4 роки тому

      The gameplay trailer was dissapointing

  • @sammccconnell940
    @sammccconnell940 5 років тому +535

    Not a particularly well researched video, seems you only got your info from the BBC, which we all know has been lacking quality in recent years.

    • @freakymoejoe2
      @freakymoejoe2 5 років тому +13

      There's atleast one mention to the national history museum of Denmark, which is going to be about as credible as you can get on this topic.

    • @orknobz8493
      @orknobz8493 5 років тому

      Yes

    • @INSANESUICIDE
      @INSANESUICIDE 5 років тому +9

      @@freakymoejoe2 except they are not, viking raids against monasteries and churches were a direct response to Charlemagne's butchery and desecration of holy pagan sites in Saxony and how Christianity had brutally murdered and butchered its way into Europe for centuries. Not because "there was easy plunder" academia is as biased and agenda based about the viking age as anything else.

    • @freakymoejoe2
      @freakymoejoe2 5 років тому +2

      @@INSANESUICIDE Oh interesting, so if you completely disregard the work of academia, where did you get your opinion on the matter? You've personally gone through all of the primary sources and competently evaluated the bigger picture, as a proffesional might?
      I'm also not sure why you'd buy into the idea that MODERN academia has any interest in twisitng history to protect christianity of all things lol.

    • @INSANESUICIDE
      @INSANESUICIDE 5 років тому +5

      @@freakymoejoe2 well studying the matter as well as having dealt with and been friends with both established historians within academia and those that are not part of academia but have proved their theories through excavations and so forth and witnessing the ugliness of established academia from the sidelines, as well as being a hobby historian and reenactor working closely with people in the field in NORWAY yes, what I say is based on reality that some foreign outsider would never comprehend. But do feel free to instruct me on y forefathers based on foreign state propaganda channels.

  • @LyrosHazard
    @LyrosHazard 5 років тому +190

    If i saw a man in the nude running at me with a battle axe i would be mortified

    • @TheInfographicsShow
      @TheInfographicsShow  5 років тому +26

      😂

    • @fishnujish1511
      @fishnujish1511 5 років тому +6

      I'd just hit him where it hurts most. He wont have chainmail to protect him

    • @LyrosHazard
      @LyrosHazard 5 років тому +3

      you do realize you would there for be coming in contact with his genitalia right?

    • @workhardism
      @workhardism 5 років тому +2

      @@LyrosHazard Or maybe your just at a gay-azz Village People reunion festival. LoL.

    • @LyrosHazard
      @LyrosHazard 5 років тому +1

      workhardism i don’t get it but okay

  • @Gapthrosnir
    @Gapthrosnir 4 роки тому +12

    As a side note, aside from just their incredibly advanced steel, their ships were far ahead of their time allowing them to travers almost any situation whilst remaining sturdy, and to boost their sailing skills they had an amazing ability of navigation which let them time their raids and locations in their advantage.

  • @zaayd
    @zaayd 4 роки тому +43

    Fun fact: The average height for a male viking was 5'6, modern day folk stories portrayed them as enormous.

    • @maxharkestad1897
      @maxharkestad1897 4 роки тому +16

      ȥαιԃ They where enormous. Not compared to us, but to people back then. They where the tallest humans at earth back then. They was much taller compared to people who lived in the Vikings time

    • @shrekofrivia6821
      @shrekofrivia6821 4 роки тому +1

      @@maxharkestad1897 fr tho my great-grandfather said that there was an enormous guy back at their time and he was only like 5'7-5'8 soo ppl used to be small back then

    • @tristan9680
      @tristan9680 4 роки тому +2

      That's average some we're taller some we're shorter just like today. The average Danish Viking was only 5'7, the average Norwegian Viking was 5'6 to 5'8 and the Swedes also known as Rus were the tallest of the bunch at 5'10 and up

    • @mr.jackhatter9385
      @mr.jackhatter9385 2 роки тому +1

      Actually the average height was 5"8.

    • @whilliamnilsson6788
      @whilliamnilsson6788 2 роки тому

      The Average height for a modern day Scandinavian is 6 foot, thats average. I think you need to check your facts bud

  • @louievbeltz9450
    @louievbeltz9450 5 років тому +362

    Because they had *beards*

    • @y2_eb90
      @y2_eb90 5 років тому +2

      Just like any other charicter that wonna look badass

    • @noahstone264
      @noahstone264 5 років тому +1

      Brilliant comment. Not just beards. Epic bushes

    • @lordofdarkdudes
      @lordofdarkdudes 5 років тому +3

      @@noahstone264 bush? BUSH?! it was no bush! it was magifictly trimmed hedge!

    • @aaronvirdee5813
      @aaronvirdee5813 5 років тому

      Bushy Beards

    • @Norilius
      @Norilius 5 років тому +3

      so did like 90% of men in Europe...

  • @Snapmare_
    @Snapmare_ 5 років тому +129

    *_"you are a raider, Legendary!"_*

  • @Ruperth316
    @Ruperth316 4 роки тому +37

    Assassin's Creed Valhalla trailer just dropped and now I'm here

  • @XoXo_Dezi
    @XoXo_Dezi 5 років тому +20

    It bothered me so bad that you had them wearing horned helmets

  • @imaverywhere6252
    @imaverywhere6252 5 років тому +276

    Hey everybody, it’s Leif Erikson Day! Hinga dinga durgen

  • @Legionarivss
    @Legionarivss 5 років тому +34

    According to BBC lol.

  • @tengems8437
    @tengems8437 4 роки тому +43

    Viking plundring a church be like: There's two bald short skinny men without weapons praying to a dead corps on a wall in a giant house full of silver
    It's free real estate

  • @h0m3st4r
    @h0m3st4r 5 років тому +190

    It should be noted that Vikings never actually wore horned helmets; that myth came about because Carl Emil Doepler made such helmets for the first Bayreuth Festival production of a German opera, Der Ring des Nibelungen (The Ring of the Nibelung).

    • @cllcccic8270
      @cllcccic8270 5 років тому +3

      we get it. u watched that commercial

    • @bajingo4759
      @bajingo4759 4 роки тому

      We all know this. You must feel very clever enlightening us. Whats next, earth isnt flat?

    • @localpirate3942
      @localpirate3942 4 роки тому

      @@bajingo4759 Actually I was under the impression that they were depicted as having horns when there was a plea for assistance from the Church, that way they could get more backing for the northern crusade... Now I have more research to do

    • @freddyg6094
      @freddyg6094 4 роки тому

      No duh

    • @Coltwollsch
      @Coltwollsch 4 роки тому

      I was under the impression that the reason it was believed they wore horned helmets was because skeletal remains had been found with drinking horns near the head but it was incorrectly assumed they wore horned helmets at the time.

  • @Necoy666
    @Necoy666 5 років тому +148

    ''Berserkers were howling and biting on their shields''
    Anybody saw Linybeige's video on berserkers? lol

  • @bararobberbaron859
    @bararobberbaron859 4 роки тому +21

    "Infographics" mistakenly made me think you would have researched and come at me with accurate information. That's my mistake, won't happen again.

  • @brunsvikk2714
    @brunsvikk2714 5 років тому +15

    They were the first europeans to come to america before Columbus but just left

    • @raylovelace8588
      @raylovelace8588 4 роки тому

      Actually, the Solutrians were here millennia before that. The so-called Clovis and Folsom projectile points look just like the Euro ones from the same era - 10-13.5K years back. They didn't seem to leave much in the way of genetic presence among current Native Americans, but the overall population was pretty sparse back then.

  • @Trev_in_Poland
    @Trev_in_Poland 5 років тому +643

    Why was Thor avoiding his brother?
    He Odin money

  • @isopodmike2204
    @isopodmike2204 5 років тому +86

    You didn't highlight Denmark when going over the area the vikings were from. . . .

    • @Jackie-mx6sm
      @Jackie-mx6sm 5 років тому +4

      They even keep saying "acording to the danish museum of..." but does not recognize Denmark

    • @aaronaaron5861
      @aaronaaron5861 5 років тому +7

      I'm not of nordic descent but I know Finland was not part of viking culture. Only Norway, Denmark, and Sweden were. As far as I know the raiders towards west (England, France, Mediterranean lands) were mostly from Norway and Denmark while the raiders toward the east (Finland, Russia, Balkan lands) were from Sweden. I could be wrong but I'm pretty sure Finland had different culture and gods and they were also raided by vikings. Iceland was inhabited by vikings later on and didn't have human population before that.

    • @Felix-fx1zu
      @Felix-fx1zu 5 років тому +2

      you are right, only denmark, norway and sweden were vikings, BUT norway was the country that had the vikings that most People reconize today. They were the ones who raided the English coast and were called satans work by the englishmen. Denmark i know mastered how to make beatufiul boats whilst sweden had more vikings clashes in their own country. If you ever see a viking With an Axe, that viking is Norwegian because they were the only ones to bear the Axe. You are right, but they were'nt who you think they are.

    • @Felix-fx1zu
      @Felix-fx1zu 5 років тому

      growlingbehemoth I’m just saying they mastered the boats, not that they didn’t go out raiding

    • @nicolajl.7849
      @nicolajl.7849 5 років тому +6

      @@Felix-fx1zu Actually, Danes are who are what we see as vikings, conquerors, politicians, raiders, pillagers. Norwegians and Swedes did have an impact, but Denmark was by far the closest to what imagie we have of vikings

  • @legendteigen461
    @legendteigen461 5 років тому +14

    Im proud to have viking anscestors! 🇳🇴🇩🇰🇸🇪

  • @MohammedSohail007
    @MohammedSohail007 4 роки тому +26

    Who's here after watching Assassin's Creed Valhalla Trailer.

  • @GeorgTheGr8
    @GeorgTheGr8 5 років тому +520

    *_But could they win against the school bully?_*

    • @SinAKAda
      @SinAKAda 5 років тому +34

      Woah dude calm down you Kno he watches this right

    • @lilfrostzy1849
      @lilfrostzy1849 5 років тому +2

      yes

    • @2degucitas
      @2degucitas 5 років тому +27

      They WERE the school bully.

    • @PlanetBeatYT
      @PlanetBeatYT 5 років тому

      Looking how they trained as young i don't think soo

    • @sungminyoon6687
      @sungminyoon6687 5 років тому

      I love ur prof pic!

  • @G0DSPAGH3T1
    @G0DSPAGH3T1 5 років тому +46

    *Thor would like to know your location*

  • @theo55645
    @theo55645 4 роки тому +12

    Berserkers were used as the first attack, also they did not have a fricking bear costume

    • @gentleasa5728
      @gentleasa5728 3 роки тому +2

      Acutually there were 3 groups of berserkers. The wolf, bear, and boar. They wore the skins accordingly, and took on that animals energy. Live and light Evie

  • @pyroparagon8945
    @pyroparagon8945 5 років тому +134

    "According to BBC" dislike. Use real sources next time

    • @tessjuel
      @tessjuel 5 років тому +14

      I don't know how biased or un biased BBC's news is these days but that doesn't mater because this is not BBC News, it's BBC Documentary. Can anybody explain what political motifs they can possibly have for skewing a documentary about something that happened a thousand years ago?

    • @cherryberry7024
      @cherryberry7024 4 роки тому +1

      @@tessjuel wrong more like the fìth century!

    • @ulfberht4431
      @ulfberht4431 3 роки тому +1

      Ok @Pyro Paragon, what sources would you recommend, seeing as how you are acting like you know much more!

    • @SoidSnake
      @SoidSnake 3 роки тому

      @@ulfberht4431 Well you could use BBC as a source as long as it is at least 10 years old or older, the did have credibility in the past but not anymore.

    • @heastoida8993
      @heastoida8993 3 роки тому

      Actually most of his facts are true.. and i think the vikings in the video got horn helmets just because of the hollywood cliche..

  • @captainhh.
    @captainhh. 5 років тому +163

    Because they were trained by Mr.Beast's viking

    • @SHAHDIFMDKF
      @SHAHDIFMDKF 5 років тому +4

      I thought you said Mr.Breast's for a second XD

    • @cristiandina8810
      @cristiandina8810 5 років тому

      Lol:))

    • @PlanetBeatYT
      @PlanetBeatYT 5 років тому +1

      They were actually trained by chuck norris but they didin't pay attention that much

    • @mmamrosh
      @mmamrosh 5 років тому +1

      Lol

  • @hobo_ytt45
    @hobo_ytt45 5 років тому +248

    Becuase they had *DRAGONS* duuuuh 😒

  • @peppstorro324
    @peppstorro324 4 роки тому +8

    "if you can fight in artic climate, you can fight anywhere"

    • @cassandrawinther
      @cassandrawinther 3 роки тому

      No you also need to be able to fight in warm weather

  • @vickiechristiansen7193
    @vickiechristiansen7193 4 роки тому +64

    10 seconds into the video and I don’t want to watch anymore. Hellooo, Denmark were vikings! Btw, they don’t have horn on their helmets.

    • @teddyragins6488
      @teddyragins6488 4 роки тому

      Yes they were but Norse Vikings seem to get more attention

    • @valividar7939
      @valividar7939 4 роки тому +8

      @@teddyragins6488 And you comment really proves why, when people hear the word "norse" vikings they think about Norway but Norse was what Scandinavians called themself back then that includes Denmark, Sweden and Norway..

    • @xnadegod1053
      @xnadegod1053 4 роки тому +1

      @@valividar7939 Denmark were Danes

    • @MsAnimelady
      @MsAnimelady 3 роки тому

      @@valividar7939 PREACH!!!

  • @DaydreamingSwede
    @DaydreamingSwede 5 років тому +61

    Actually Finland didnt have vikings, but vikings raided and traided with them, the vikings that traveled down the Volga river and such in Russia were mostly Swedish

    • @SkrrtRonalds
      @SkrrtRonalds 5 років тому +1

      Finland was basically russia

    • @VikingFitness00
      @VikingFitness00 4 роки тому +2

      The Western area of Finland today (Ostrobothinia) was synonymous with Sweden and the people there were Swedish/Finns and had Vikings combatants. The Viking who ruled Novgorod in Russia was Rurik and his DNA results are most similar to the people who live in this area to this day. Also the word Russia some believe comes from this same group of Vikings who would of spoke Old Finnish/Norse dialect and Russia could of been named after the word for Sweden which in Finnish today is Ruotsi.

    • @slpr666
      @slpr666 4 роки тому +7

      VikingFitness It's belived that the name "Russia" comes from the Swedish viking settlement "Kievan Rus".

    • @jakemarsh8967
      @jakemarsh8967 4 роки тому +2

      I'd say the Finns were more trade companions than victims of raids, Finns would have been valuable to the Swedish traders when moving east since Finns would better be able to speak with some of the tribes along the Volga due to the difference between Slavic and Germanic language families.

    • @ruslankazimov622
      @ruslankazimov622 4 роки тому +2

      Modern russians (atleast 80%) look very asiatic. Roundhead, slanted eyes. Putin phenotype is extremely wide. Closest people to Kievan Rus remained today are Ukrainians.

  • @urphat4686
    @urphat4686 5 років тому +59

    Now imagine them with ak47s

  • @KattFisken
    @KattFisken 3 роки тому +4

    Even as a swede, I have to point out how wrong it is that Denmark is left out on all the maps in this video..

    • @yvindwien8686
      @yvindwien8686 2 роки тому

      I am from Norway, and you are embarrassing Scandinavia.

  • @josiahcain4176
    @josiahcain4176 4 роки тому +14

    I literally laughed as soon as I saw horned helmets and heard raindeer leather! Pfft! Yea um Vikings had metal weapons, were well trained, had the best navy at the time, used a combination of chainmale and a special leatherlike armor made of multiple lairs.

    • @cherryberry7024
      @cherryberry7024 4 роки тому +2

      elk !not reindeer.

    • @Alsayid
      @Alsayid 4 роки тому

      But it is more romantic to think of vikings with reindeer leather, and their clan leader is 3x their size with a battle axe made from a a large piece of driftwood and a broken boulder. :-)

    • @tommyanderson5525
      @tommyanderson5525 4 роки тому

      @@Alsayid the warrior vikings ate and drank much so not impossible of big dudes but you're right anything can be romanticize and reality always tells different

  • @polish_filipino
    @polish_filipino 5 років тому +56

    4:31 _Ah, So I see they were actually ninjas the whole time_
    (They happened to have boats)

    • @mrjones3026
      @mrjones3026 5 років тому

      Wtf every kind of warriors had boats back then, viking is the point most far away from ninjas

    • @MrPancake777
      @MrPancake777 5 років тому +1

      big sn0ke its a joke 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️

    • @Da1_ow
      @Da1_ow 5 років тому

      Oh please, the ninjas in Ninjago had a boat too...

    • @mrjones3026
      @mrjones3026 5 років тому

      @@MrPancake777 its...uhmm. not funny

    • @TheStrayy
      @TheStrayy 5 років тому

      *ACTUALLY HAPPENED*

  • @wilkinson6400
    @wilkinson6400 5 років тому +27

    I've never heard so much misinformation in my life, your "sources" are quite questionable.

  • @Alsayid
    @Alsayid 4 роки тому +19

    Here is something I always wanted to know. Maybe some Scandinavians have some opinions. Why do you think the viking region went from being so war-like to so pacifist?

    • @user-lu6xb7pw3k
      @user-lu6xb7pw3k 4 роки тому +5

      I think it had to do with all the missionaries who came and preached about Christianity and its benefits of trade and cooperation with most parts of Europe until the idea took hold and began to spread throughout the country.

    • @mr.jackhatter9385
      @mr.jackhatter9385 2 роки тому

      Because the vikings ended up ruling all of europe and there was nobody left to fight.

    • @o1ympia616
      @o1ympia616 2 роки тому +6

      @@mr.jackhatter9385 history left the Chat

    • @whilliamnilsson6788
      @whilliamnilsson6788 2 роки тому +2

      As a Swede and a practioner of the Asatro, the "viking" religion i can say that the religion itself never was violent, we had our ways of sacrifice but most of the religion is about nature and spirits, there were the ulfhednars and beserkers who were known as beasts from nature but thats pretty much it. Norway and Denmark were more into the fighting meanwhile Sweden was like the viking jerusalem, we didn't fight as much and were more into religion, spirit and nature. Thats why Uppsala, the viking jerusalem is in sweden, because we were the most spiritual. But war is in every relgion, Christians preach love and peace yet they go to war and still do today. It's my opinion mixed with some facts, just wanted to share :)

    • @GlacierCodfish
      @GlacierCodfish Рік тому +1

      Cultural masculinity developed into a civilized culture I think is one factor.
      But most of all I think it is because of christianity.
      What I disagree on with your question is how we are so "pacifist".. In my opinion we are peacefull, not pacifist! We like our modern army AND our work for world peace. (Sweden is more focused on neutrality than Norway is).
      The viking era and culture was many things; Some positive things, but also extremely brutal compared to the christian values we have today. Vikings lived by "an eye for an eye", which is barbaric and totally unheard of in Norway today.

  • @lemo2x713
    @lemo2x713 4 роки тому +32

    Nobody:
    Me: is this a Vinland saga reference

  • @NiksenLive
    @NiksenLive 5 років тому +30

    I think you forgot to include Denmark, they were as much viking as Sweden and Norway :)

    • @legendteigen461
      @legendteigen461 5 років тому +6

      Yeah every country went their different ways, Norwegians went West/Northwest, Danes went West, and the swedish went east to russia, etc. So they should def include Denmark aswell

    • @ghostishere1878
      @ghostishere1878 5 років тому +3

      This video is actually discriminatory

    • @kasperknutsen8283
      @kasperknutsen8283 5 років тому

      @@legendteigen461 norway for the most

    • @user-ko1hi1fy9z
      @user-ko1hi1fy9z 5 років тому +1

      Denmark inferior to ancient Sweden reeee!

    • @kasperknutsen8283
      @kasperknutsen8283 5 років тому +1

      @@hoar2340 yes it is actually only norway and denmark+iceland. But sweden did their own thing i guess

  • @MidnightBloomDev
    @MidnightBloomDev 5 років тому +150

    *_Ragnar Lothbrook typing_*

    • @bogdan8111
      @bogdan8111 5 років тому +3

      It's actually Lodbrok

    • @jaydesanchez2441
      @jaydesanchez2441 5 років тому +8

      Ivar is typing......

    • @mikewazzupski
      @mikewazzupski 5 років тому +10

      @@adsrfg5213 Lothbrok is enligsh verison it is actually ragnar lodbrok

    • @MrBlueatlantis
      @MrBlueatlantis 5 років тому +6

      It is Loðbrók and Lothbrok in english it translates to hairybriefs

    • @JohnWhiteHere
      @JohnWhiteHere 5 років тому +5

      Actually it’s Lodbrog muthafuckaaas, cause he was Danish!!!

  • @Bernieo153
    @Bernieo153 4 роки тому +7

    Interesting facts:
    The national boats in my country, the Faroe Islands, are still built the same way as our viking ancestors built them. And many boats that compete in the annual rowing races are fitted with the dragon's head bow. Faroe Islanders are the best in the world at rowing because the tradition has been kept alive since viking times :)

  • @I_am_Diogenes
    @I_am_Diogenes 5 років тому +101

    WHY would you listen to the BBC about ANYTHING ?

  • @joshuamirabal3617
    @joshuamirabal3617 5 років тому +10

    They were so good for the same reason the Spartans were as good as they were. Their whole lives were dedicated to fighting. They had superior battle tactics and training. They also (like the Spartans) used psychological warfare to their advantage which plays a HUGE part in battle.

  • @OriginalJayByrd
    @OriginalJayByrd 5 років тому +391

    Graphics show no vikings from Denmark, can we really trust anything else this video says?? ;)

    • @plexer13
      @plexer13 5 років тому

      😒

    • @amandafranks5108
      @amandafranks5108 5 років тому +9

      I would say not xD Danes are very different to Vikings

    • @pateannala2637
      @pateannala2637 5 років тому +51

      Video says that there was vikings in Finland zone... There wasn't

    • @codeanyo-7925
      @codeanyo-7925 5 років тому

      Jonas Jensen Danes are not Vikings

    • @Adam-dd5fx
      @Adam-dd5fx 5 років тому +11

      And vikings didn't have horns on their helmets

  • @slothfromthegoonies8201
    @slothfromthegoonies8201 5 років тому +33

    They weren't, they were raiders who caught their targets off-guard. Their record in pitched battles against well-trained armies is actually pretty abysmal.

    • @SerCorydonRivers
      @SerCorydonRivers 5 років тому +4

      Can't lie they were experts at guerrilla warfare and ambushing. Even William the conquerer decided paying the Viking Lord's to leave would be smarter then fighting as they hindered his marches and castle building and fought harder then the Englishman who were also at war with the Norman's.

    • @Enzo012
      @Enzo012 4 роки тому

      I dunno, the Varangean Guard would have a word with you.

    • @xiijinpingthesupremeleader1349
      @xiijinpingthesupremeleader1349 2 роки тому

      Yup

  • @drhapi5308
    @drhapi5308 3 роки тому +4

    AC Valhalla dropped, is amazing. Now I’m here binging every drop of Viking the web has to offer

  • @youssefhassanein3888
    @youssefhassanein3888 5 років тому +15

    vikings did not have horns on their helmet but on the animation they had helmets.

  • @mrbenjiboy9527
    @mrbenjiboy9527 5 років тому +18

    Virgin catholic vs Viking chad

    • @gagne6928
      @gagne6928 5 років тому

      Gamers 🔫 society

  • @josephswietlik7013
    @josephswietlik7013 3 роки тому +4

    No one:
    Absolutely no one:
    Infographics Show: According to the BBC...

  • @paulwilson4685
    @paulwilson4685 5 років тому +19

    You shut me down by placing horns on helmets...never existed

  • @blakegreene4525
    @blakegreene4525 5 років тому +43

    Take a shot for every time the video references BBC.

  • @algoraxmago1527
    @algoraxmago1527 5 років тому +48

    "According to a BBC article" yeeeeeah, definitely trustworthy...

  • @alexbowman7582
    @alexbowman7582 4 роки тому +7

    All that rowing must have gave them great upper body strength and they had the ability to heat steel 100 Celsius higher than other Europeans.

    • @raylovelace8588
      @raylovelace8588 4 роки тому +1

      Hmm.Just thought of this: arms strengthened by rowing push more air through the bellows = Uhlfbert swords. OK, that works.
      Thanks!

  • @Vividlol
    @Vividlol 4 роки тому +1

    That Viking with the axe said “stay ready so you don’t gotta get ready” in a lot of words

  • @KnightSlasher
    @KnightSlasher 5 років тому +34

    "Where is your beard and where is your axe"

    • @killaklown7229
      @killaklown7229 5 років тому +2

      would you rather be gay or have stage 4 cancer, kinda a hard choice tbh

    • @CloroxBleach-fd6ph
      @CloroxBleach-fd6ph 5 років тому +1

      @@killaklown7229 stage 4 cancer

    • @fbyi2940
      @fbyi2940 5 років тому

      @@CloroxBleach-fd6ph alright, see you at the hospital

  • @tyrander1652
    @tyrander1652 5 років тому +8

    I'm pretty certain I could beat up a French priest, especially if I had an axe and the element of surprise.

  • @daltonevans3412
    @daltonevans3412 4 роки тому +4

    There is an astounding amount of inaccuracies in this video.

  • @comingoutofhibernation2122
    @comingoutofhibernation2122 4 роки тому +10

    Two words: Scandinavian awesomeness. Glad I could clear that up for anybody still in the dark.

    • @cassandrawinther
      @cassandrawinther 3 роки тому +1

      Did you know that some of the English words come from the danish language and the vikings carried it over to you guys

    • @SoidSnake
      @SoidSnake 3 роки тому +2

      @@cassandrawinther Not the danish language but Old Norse. Old Norse does not exist anymore but Norwegian Nynorsk, Icelandic and Faroese is the closest to Old Norse. OId Norse influenced the English language.

    • @finngregory3599
      @finngregory3599 2 роки тому

      Awesomeness > harmful Romanticism

  • @Gunmundr
    @Gunmundr 5 років тому +53

    Viking: lowers down sword and yells out of his lungs....
    DUN MAH GLAS!!!!!!!!!

  • @haiyingwang8661
    @haiyingwang8661 5 років тому +10

    Leif Erikson has left
    the chat.

  • @coldsake07
    @coldsake07 4 роки тому +4

    Did you know the vikings pioneered the invention of the teapot cozy? It allowed them to drink hot sleepy time tea, keeping them all warm and snugglie on long sea voyages!

  • @gregkillian8216
    @gregkillian8216 2 роки тому

    This is so awesome!!

  • @danishlegionnaire
    @danishlegionnaire 5 років тому +27

    Oh boy in the very beginning you forgot to paint the country with the most vikings (as in the raiding and warrior ones in Western Europe), namely, Denmark

  • @deletthis5040
    @deletthis5040 5 років тому +6

    Vikings: We believe in honor and courage
    Also vikings: *sneak attacks unarmed village people*

    • @shtorka_v_dome
      @shtorka_v_dome 4 роки тому

      Vikings have created myths about themselves that do not correspond to reality.

    • @user-lt4sx5bd1h
      @user-lt4sx5bd1h 4 роки тому

      Dont trust that

    • @ericolsen5592
      @ericolsen5592 4 роки тому

      You salty Russians

    • @raylovelace8588
      @raylovelace8588 4 роки тому

      @@shtorka_v_dome As do all people in all times, apparently. Maybe even chimps, for all we know.

    • @Enzo012
      @Enzo012 4 роки тому

      There's a story of some Viking raiders who just looted some gold from a village and left. They weren't happy that they didn't have a decent fight for the gold so they return to the village killed some folk and then left with their honour fully intact.

  • @diarrheadan8088
    @diarrheadan8088 4 роки тому +30

    The toughest warrior of all time?
    The florida man

  • @user-uu4pk5zp4j
    @user-uu4pk5zp4j 5 років тому +5

    Physical strength, weapons and willingness to fight.

  • @johhhnsen
    @johhhnsen 5 років тому +10

    0:16 When you didn’t mark Denmark I was triggered

    • @oscarstenderup
      @oscarstenderup 5 років тому +1

      JohnnyTheAce *mark* Den *mark* . I see what you did there brøder...

    • @mathias7398
      @mathias7398 5 років тому +1

      JohnnyTheAce korrekt han er dum i hovedet

    • @legendteigen461
      @legendteigen461 5 років тому +1

      Even though i am a Norwegian, i also got a little triggered that they didnt add our danish brothers

  • @dr.nutsacc
    @dr.nutsacc 5 років тому +5

    You know for a fact there was a kid that came to school wearing full armor made of gold and flexed

  • @shug3158
    @shug3158 4 роки тому +6

    Do you think he got some information from the BBC?

  • @rjan9719
    @rjan9719 4 роки тому +4

    Its beacause they ate a large amount of mushrooms before going into battle

    • @Kvitravn.
      @Kvitravn. 4 роки тому +2

      Weeeeeel, no. But yes aswel, They created stew from a highly poisonous mushroom found mostly in Norway and Denmark Wich they gave to warriors to send them into a Brutal rage making them more or less loose control for a short period of time, screaming shouting and attacking anything they could get they're hands on, it was more or less a suicide scare tactic, most of the vikings eating the stew would die either from the battle or the poison during or after the battle.
      (the more you know👍🏼)

    • @Enzo012
      @Enzo012 4 роки тому

      @@Kvitravn. It could be what the Berserkers ate before battle but other sources suggest they did go 'berserk' at all they just got their name from wearing bearskins.

  • @Macedthur
    @Macedthur 5 років тому +65

    One example of a Viking:
    *Pewdiepie*

    • @PeterPuncher
      @PeterPuncher 5 років тому +17

      How far the mighty have fallen

    • @BORGEBJ
      @BORGEBJ 5 років тому +4

      Pseudopseudohypoparathyroidism haha exactly.

    • @haroldz123
      @haroldz123 5 років тому +1

      Pls dont insult their glorious history. Oh wait....

    • @legendteigen461
      @legendteigen461 5 років тому

      Swedish Viking tho

    • @tubbeyt
      @tubbeyt 5 років тому +3

      The swedes were the least vikings btw

  • @rpast5656
    @rpast5656 5 років тому +27

    I love viking history anyone the same?

    • @louisfill849
      @louisfill849 5 років тому +1

      Samurai and Chinese for me

    • @mikewazzupski
      @mikewazzupski 5 років тому

      watch the tv serie vikings if u have not its awsome

    • @ethanideas1216
      @ethanideas1216 5 років тому

      This is not historical, it’s just a guy reading a Wikipedia page

    • @ThatIcelandicDude
      @ThatIcelandicDude 5 років тому

      @@mikewazzupski Jesus that show is a an embarrassment to viking history...

    • @hugokarlson9559
      @hugokarlson9559 5 років тому +1

      Ichigo 360@same my ancestors were vikings!😄

  • @manolmomchilov1192
    @manolmomchilov1192 4 роки тому +4

    *sighs* Vikings with horned helmets is a modern myth...

  • @Olifantenstaart
    @Olifantenstaart 4 роки тому +1

    The main reason is simple: as they came by sea & rivers, they had the element of surprise on their side. The Norse were battle ready whereas their victims were completely in the dark until it was all but too late.

    • @Jow2002
      @Jow2002 4 роки тому

      Well not exactly

  • @superreiska69
    @superreiska69 5 років тому +112

    Finland is not or never was a Viking country

    • @mussunmussun3536
      @mussunmussun3536 5 років тому +8

      This is true. Only shamans

    • @skull_crusher7416
      @skull_crusher7416 5 років тому +5

      r u gay

    • @lemmylaitila1118
      @lemmylaitila1118 5 років тому +1

      Very much right

    • @markoj.7675
      @markoj.7675 5 років тому +16

      Finland was raided from time to time, but vikings never had pernament settlements there. Although after the viking age there were finnic vikings that raided Sweden until Sweden conquered Finland in 13th century

    • @tomtenkiller
      @tomtenkiller 5 років тому +4

      Nah you were to bad. Finland is Sweden's appendix 😂

  • @Adam-dd5fx
    @Adam-dd5fx 5 років тому +47

    VIKINGS DIDN'T HAVE HORNS ON THERE HELMETS!!!

    • @whynottalklikeapirat
      @whynottalklikeapirat 5 років тому

      nor did they have morning stars

    • @bestwarrior2660
      @bestwarrior2660 4 роки тому +2

      Be a lot cooler if they did

    • @whynottalklikeapirat
      @whynottalklikeapirat 4 роки тому

      @@bestwarrior2660 Some vikings had hornets in their helmets and were none to pleased with the concept, spawning the other popular myth of the berserker.

    • @whynottalklikeapirat
      @whynottalklikeapirat 4 роки тому +1

      Adam "THERE" IS SPELLED "THEIR"!!!! NORMAL CONVERSATION IS NOT ALL CAPS!!!!

    • @cherryberry7024
      @cherryberry7024 4 роки тому +1

      yes they did ! that was there sunday best gear! but not for raiding! too cumbersum!.

  • @AskanHelstroem
    @AskanHelstroem 5 років тому +6

    horned helmet...rly...
    no one could fight with these things.
    It was just a fancy widget for Wagners Opera

    • @MrPonytron
      @MrPonytron 3 роки тому

      And it was a way the christians demonized the vikings

  • @raizon-tx4gq
    @raizon-tx4gq 3 роки тому +1

    "Live in honor, die in glory"