Pete, I’ve been listening to your show religiously for 2+ years. This is the best show I’ve heard you do. The first round was a little bit hostile but this is a phenomenal second interview. Thank you and keep up the good work.
I am 100% in favor of a podcast, a separate new podcast, with just the two of you discussing… well, Everything. This has been a delightfully refreshing intelligent discourse. I love your both your minds, your hearts and good intent. I have high regard for the respect you have for each other as well. Who wouldn’t want to listen to you two on a regular basis..?My subscription finger is ready and waiting.
Enjoyed this interview. Weinstein's point on needing more STEM folks in Congress is so underrated. He's spot on that its all lawyers and rich people, and that we need more folks who can actually solve problems.
Agreed. But the only people who have any chance in hell of succeeding are people like Eric: those who are both great intellects and great communicators. Unfortunately, our intellectual geniuses often lack the latter. After all, who has it all when most have neither? Eric definitely has both.
uh, stem field is the one whos bent and supported this clown world nonsense, and allowing the biggest frau in first world country history to occur. first with the installation of a vegetable (where is eric ins peaking about this, great job whining after hes destroying the country at a never seen before pace a year after) that didnt win. then with spending 1000s of times more on this fl season than on any of the other flu seasons that had the same people dine in 2020 as in any other year. then with allowing this joke of a non-vac to go on, that had more people die in 2021 than in 2020, and see enormous spikes in all kinds of serious diseases from nowhere, with life insurance companies seeing inexplainable, orers of magnitude outsidie of margin of error, 40% increases, only after the rollout of the "vac"
Really enjoyed the interview with Eric Weinstein this time around. I was a harsh critic of him during the 1st interview because of my own projections of wanting to defend Bitcoin. I see him in a totally different light this time around. Thanks Bro!
As someone who criticized the previous interview with Weinstein, It should be recognized that this one was excellent Peter. Well done! Something to keep in mind. Some people have hyperbolic irrational issues with your content and need to buzz off. Others are simply providing perceived criticism without malice hoping for a constructive outcome.
Thanks as always Eric. Keep plugging away at the physics problem, there are people who care. If you start a foundation, I would make a donation in a heartbeat
@@Esch_atton it’s like donating money to flat earth. Use your money more intelligently. It’s not taken seriously because it presents nothing of scientific value.
I’m so delighted that you took that first podcast as an opportunity for growth. It’s shows you proved your work. This was outstanding. More. You guys elevated my thinking. Thank you
Informative and constructive. I heard a previous conversation quite some time ago, that I thought had so much more potential, and this one was it. Nice one!
Well done.. I’ve agreed a lot with eric whenever I’ve listened to him but always left a bit of arrogant, stubborn genius taste.. but he’s cracked that facade this interview, bravo.
"Too many of us are too dumb with too much power". Well said good sir. Eric is such a smart guy....and kudos to dude interviewer for being quiet and listening. His first interview with Eric was painful to watch. That said, he's doing it and improving. Good work Mate!
Well done Peter. I just watched the previous interview with Eric and you can tell that you take the podcast much more seriously, which it improves the quality.
Peter. In the last 6 months, youve had more valuable conversations than probably anything ive heard on Rogan. Joe has interesting conversations, sometimes valuable, you are having important conversations. Btw, thanks for having the balls to say Trudeau, as a Canadian, it takes the sting out when i see that people actually care and the world is speaking out
@@MrObnoxiousPod te hacks that utterly destroyed the economy with tens of trillions of dollars on a fl season that killed the same number in 2020 as in any other normal year, and the ones to blame for an unprescedented 40% increase in life insurances that can only be explained by one thing, and will kill and cause more harm than the fl season ever did, are the people speaking misinf-on. why are you using their cultlanguage?
@@MrObnoxiousPod check vaers data and just try to find an explanation. 80000% increase in 2021 on a scale that is very stable throughout time (80k percent because its well proven that its underreported by 98%)
Always refreshing to hear Eric’s perspective. I don’t understand his math and physics statements but I find his perspective on social systems and societal structure to very concise.
I really like the lighting, layout, cameras. It feels simple and real. The side view of the glass table, in particular, makes the space understandable and communicates "just two people talking". Yes, what you were talking about was good too. Just expressing that the aesthetics are solid.
Lisented. This left me flat. We are "doomed" and we have to "leave". Bull hockey. Too much doom and gloom. You said you need to do better? You did not push back on any of this?
Dude, stay true to yourself. I would much rather watch someone I disagree with telling me what they really think, than someone pandering what I want to hear to me. I can tell the difference between the person trying to find the truth, and the person parroting the party line - whether they do it intentionally or not. I value an earnest search for truth, even if I disagree with it. Keep doing you, I really enjoyed this.
Hey Peter, does it feel like you just won a boss fight? This went a lot more smoothly than the last time, and I'd say that's a good sign of growth! The first 60 seconds were enough to blow away any worries I had going into the conversation. I don't agree with every viewpoint Eric has, but I do like the way he thinks. I'll never have his level of knowledge when it comes to scientific concepts or physics or laws of mathematics (it's just not my field of specialty), but I hope the way he stays realistic and presents bold ideas and juggles high level concepts while tying them together is a glimpse of what I'll be thinking like in 20 years. I feel like we should see as many people like this as we can, not to learn what they say and repeat it, but just to get exposure to what kind of goal to strive for when it comes to thinking independently and intelligently.
To be honest, I came here to see Eric Weinstein since he hasn’t made any portal episodes in a while. But I really like this conversation, mate, and the questions you ask Eric. I’ll definitely be back ✌️
I think the lack of communication between social classes is one of the most important topics we should be discussing. As a poor, uneducated, and low-class citizen I feel like there’s a huge disconnect on perspective regarding large scale issue’s and political philosophy.
Well done Eric and Peter. Last interaction I was disappointed in the poor preparation by Peter and the childlike approach to the nuance Bitcoin offers to the incentive structure in theoretical physics funding and advancement. Kudos to Peter for recognising this and getting Eric back and looking at how he runs and prepares for shows. I believe Eric can be a great inspiration to the bitcoin community.
Great, Interview, really love it. Starting a science institute researching fundamental physics is my Bitcoin moon plan. Since I am still young it might play out in a few decades.
Peter your my fav bitcoin you tuber Ive learnt so much from your podcast and feel Ive grown as a human. I love how you can disagree with people and are so civil in your discourse. You care about vulnerable people and have an understanding of the plebs like me and why we need some form of centralisation you are the best positive vibes to you and your team keep on keepn on brother:)
Eric has the best combination of insightfulness with current events, applied academic knowledge and extrapolation to derive the most important conclusions. The fact that this intellect has such self-doubt that he does is astonishing to me, but it truly exemplifies that he really cares for both his audience and for the species as a whole.
Video and interview quality is good, but it’s interesting you chose to set your studio with windows as the background, have you not heard of the silhouette effect??
Thank you Peter and Eric. Another interestig discussion that has me thinking of how I might capitalize on my belief in Bitcoin to help shape a better world. I've already started with those close to me. Have a good weekend!
Wow, that was so good. Really shows he prepared for this one. That is why Peter is so good, and Eric mentioned this, he adapts/learns/grows. Not allowed to coast anymore, big boy pants!
I genuinely enjoy this show. I gave some feedback on a clip video. So I’m not gonna go back over that. But I would say that one other bit of feedback I would provide is that sometimes this host gets lost in the weeds unnecessarily. There were multiple times in this discussion where Eric was using something as an example about a broader point… But the host didn’t pick up on that. So what ended up happening was he started providing analysis of the example Eric provided as opposed to the point he was actually trying to make. I’m sure this will get better with time.
Explain the double slit experiment to me please!! And while you're there, how about the delayed choice quantum eraser problem science seems to have!! So many questions, so few answers.
@ Peter Cormick, Eric inspired me of a great content addition, you could perhaps save shorts and special highlights as addressing ideas you cared to expand your stance, sorta A La Jordan Peterson I think authenticity goes a long way
Really love this conversation. I think Eric should have some conversations with someone who can make strong transcendental and metaphysical arguments. I’m curious how he would attempt to take them apart (if he could). I suspect taking that angle might help him in some way in his quest to create a new physics.
He has already written the draft version of his paper. I have read it. There is nothing transcendental, metaphysical, spiritual or sacred about any part of it. It is serious physics.
23:50 but Eric, if we give up the 90% that ARE well and intelligent, because we dont want to associate with the 10% that are nuts, you're throwing out potentially great things because of the few nutjobs out there... That's wrong. If anything is objectively "wrong", that is wrong. It'd be like abolishing universities because 1 professor in 100 are incompetent. You throw out that 1 professor, you dont throw out the other 99 that want to make the world a better place.
36:56 One of the common themes discussed during the dawn of the nuclear age was "Is humanity wise enough and moral enough to have this awesome, and destructive, power in it's hands?" Will we destroy ourselves? Prior to two the last two hundred years, the world had changed little fundamentally for two thousand years. Profound thought by Eric. In less than a single human lifetime, we went from musket-shooters to having fusion weapons! I think if making an atomic device were as easy as a pipe bomb, it WOULD be the end of the world. Thank goodness it's not. It still leaves the question, is our moral / cultural development progressing at a sufficient pace? Is greater authoritarianism the way to safety, or more freedom and respect for the individual?
I was disappointed when previously Eric had expressed disdain for UFO’s. So I was equally shocked when Eric expressed a 180 on UFO’s in this interview.
I've seen this evolving over the past two years. I think he is joining the larger scientific community that has grown to accept that metaphysics needs to be integrated and involves entities and/or creators larger and considerably smarter than ourselves.
One of the greatest things ive listened to in a long time
Pete,
I’ve been listening to your show religiously for 2+ years. This is the best show I’ve heard you do. The first round was a little bit hostile but this is a phenomenal second interview. Thank you and keep up the good work.
Glad you two had an intellectual conversation vs adversarial, much to ponder. Thanks for bringing Eric back on your show.
This was a one sided conversation ...
every part of this discussion is fantastic. thank you both!
I am 100% in favor of a podcast, a separate new podcast, with just the two of you discussing… well, Everything. This has been a delightfully refreshing intelligent discourse. I love your both your minds, your hearts and good intent. I have high regard for the respect you have for each other as well. Who wouldn’t want to listen to you two on a regular basis..?My subscription finger is ready and waiting.
100% do it.
Enjoyed this interview. Weinstein's point on needing more STEM folks in Congress is so underrated. He's spot on that its all lawyers and rich people, and that we need more folks who can actually solve problems.
STEM folks like solving actual problems, which is why they DON'T run for political office.
@@JeffCaplan313 Governments today are the problem. We need STEM fixers
Agreed. But the only people who have any chance in hell of succeeding are people like Eric: those who are both great intellects and great communicators. Unfortunately, our intellectual geniuses often lack the latter. After all, who has it all when most have neither? Eric definitely has both.
America hates science. Look at the last few years.
uh, stem field is the one whos bent and supported this clown world nonsense, and allowing the biggest frau in first world country history to occur.
first with the installation of a vegetable (where is eric ins peaking about this, great job whining after hes destroying the country at a never seen before pace a year after) that didnt win.
then with spending 1000s of times more on this fl season than on any of the other flu seasons that had the same people dine in 2020 as in any other year.
then with allowing this joke of a non-vac to go on, that had more people die in 2021 than in 2020, and see enormous spikes in all kinds of serious diseases from nowhere, with life insurance companies seeing inexplainable, orers of magnitude outsidie of margin of error, 40% increases, only after the rollout of the "vac"
I love that line: " You need to give yourself a budget for screwing up" Always interested to hear Eric's views. Nice one!
Really enjoyed the interview with Eric Weinstein this time around. I was a harsh critic of him during the 1st interview because of my own projections of wanting to defend Bitcoin. I see him in a totally different light this time around. Thanks Bro!
As someone who criticized the previous interview with Weinstein, It should be recognized that this one was excellent Peter. Well done!
Something to keep in mind. Some people have hyperbolic irrational issues with your content and need to buzz off. Others are simply providing perceived criticism without malice hoping for a constructive outcome.
Brilliant. Finally a conversation I have thoroughly enjoyed based on really important topics. Please come together again soon!
Thanks as always Eric. Keep plugging away at the physics problem, there are people who care. If you start a foundation, I would make a donation in a heartbeat
I don't have a lot of Bitcoin but I would be more than willing to give him a chunk of mine if it meant his theory starts to be taken seriously.
You fell for the grift
@@Esch_atton it’s like donating money to flat earth. Use your money more intelligently. It’s not taken seriously because it presents nothing of scientific value.
Eric is by far my favorite public intellectual. Thanks for getting him on your podcast
I’m so delighted that you took that first podcast as an opportunity for growth. It’s shows you proved your work. This was outstanding. More. You guys elevated my thinking. Thank you
Informative and constructive. I heard a previous conversation quite some time ago, that I thought had so much more potential, and this one was it. Nice one!
Need to see more of Eric. Thought provoking interview. Time for Bitcoiner's to get serious.
I couldn’t believe it when this gem showed up in my subscriptions 💎
Eric - "I'm doing a one man show, you guys have an army....we should get together and have some fun". I just love that line
top podcast, cheers for this one guys. Felt like a little bit of sanity injected into my day
God damn that was a good listen. Its pretty rare for me to listen to something this long without a break.
Well done.. I’ve agreed a lot with eric whenever I’ve listened to him but always left a bit of arrogant, stubborn genius taste.. but he’s cracked that facade this interview, bravo.
"Too many of us are too dumb with too much power". Well said good sir. Eric is such a smart guy....and kudos to dude interviewer for being quiet and listening. His first interview with Eric was painful to watch. That said, he's doing it and improving. Good work Mate!
He’s an armchair intellectual. What has he done? Why do we see his face on UA-cam?
this interview was so much better than the previous one with Eric. Tyvm
Eric. Get back on The Portal for the 90% please. That essay from the thicket you read was phenomenal. Need more…
I have been listening since 2019 and I'd say this is my favorite interview yet. Which is saying something because you have had some serious bangers.
Well done Peter. I just watched the previous interview with Eric and you can tell that you take the podcast much more seriously, which it improves the quality.
Peter. In the last 6 months, youve had more valuable conversations than probably anything ive heard on Rogan. Joe has interesting conversations, sometimes valuable, you are having important conversations. Btw, thanks for having the balls to say Trudeau, as a Canadian, it takes the sting out when i see that people actually care and the world is speaking out
That is so kind of you to say.
@@MrObnoxiousPod te hacks that utterly destroyed the economy with tens of trillions of dollars on a fl season that killed the same number in 2020 as in any other normal year, and the ones to blame for an unprescedented 40% increase in life insurances that can only be explained by one thing, and will kill and cause more harm than the fl season ever did, are the people speaking misinf-on.
why are you using their cultlanguage?
@@MrObnoxiousPod check vaers data and just try to find an explanation. 80000% increase in 2021 on a scale that is very stable throughout time (80k percent because its well proven that its underreported by 98%)
Always refreshing to hear Eric’s perspective. I don’t understand his math and physics statements but I find his perspective on social systems and societal structure to very concise.
Great work keeping thought free and diverse. You’re one of my favorite UA-cam subscriptions because of the diversity and range of topics discussed
"Let's not synonmize smartness with pieces of paper" that's why I love Eric. He respects intelligence, not credentials.
Another great interview. Is this the new 60 Minutes of our time?? I think so. Great job Peter and team.
Once I saw the guest, I had to watch! Entertaining and intellectual conversation
I really like the lighting, layout, cameras. It feels simple and real. The side view of the glass table, in particular, makes the space understandable and communicates "just two people talking". Yes, what you were talking about was good too. Just expressing that the aesthetics are solid.
Lisented. This left me flat. We are "doomed" and we have to "leave". Bull hockey. Too much doom and gloom. You said you need to do better? You did not push back on any of this?
Excellent discussion.... many thanks for this.
Boom! Great conversation!
Dude, stay true to yourself. I would much rather watch someone I disagree with telling me what they really think, than someone pandering what I want to hear to me. I can tell the difference between the person trying to find the truth, and the person parroting the party line - whether they do it intentionally or not. I value an earnest search for truth, even if I disagree with it. Keep doing you, I really enjoyed this.
Hey Peter, does it feel like you just won a boss fight? This went a lot more smoothly than the last time, and I'd say that's a good sign of growth! The first 60 seconds were enough to blow away any worries I had going into the conversation.
I don't agree with every viewpoint Eric has, but I do like the way he thinks. I'll never have his level of knowledge when it comes to scientific concepts or physics or laws of mathematics (it's just not my field of specialty), but I hope the way he stays realistic and presents bold ideas and juggles high level concepts while tying them together is a glimpse of what I'll be thinking like in 20 years. I feel like we should see as many people like this as we can, not to learn what they say and repeat it, but just to get exposure to what kind of goal to strive for when it comes to thinking independently and intelligently.
Eric on almost every podcast: "Nobody is having the big, adult conversations that I want to have. Anyway, let's talk about twitter drama."
He’s not wrong tho lol. He’s also human.
Ha. A reasonable joke.
Thank you for this conversation. Serious food for thought!
Smashing the videos out! Thank you very much ❤️
This may be the best show I have heard from you. Thanks!
Always enjoy your conversations and insight and have missed you, Eric
The closing topic should be a two hour interview
Enjoyed this; the first step to fixing anything in this world is know better what we don't know.
To be honest, I came here to see Eric Weinstein since he hasn’t made any portal episodes in a while. But I really like this conversation, mate, and the questions you ask Eric. I’ll definitely be back ✌️
Just subscribed because of this pod . Love it
Great work both of you. Thank you
One of the best, if not the best interview with Eric, thank you so much for this one 🙏
This was amazing. It gave me hope for the first time in years and moved me to tears.
20:27
great way of putting it
Mic drop!
That last part should be a meme.
I think the lack of communication between social classes is one of the most important topics we should be discussing. As a poor, uneducated, and low-class citizen I feel like there’s a huge disconnect on perspective regarding large scale issue’s and political philosophy.
Well done Eric and Peter. Last interaction I was disappointed in the poor preparation by Peter and the childlike approach to the nuance Bitcoin offers to the incentive structure in theoretical physics funding and advancement. Kudos to Peter for recognising this and getting Eric back and looking at how he runs and prepares for shows. I believe Eric can be a great inspiration to the bitcoin community.
Great, Interview, really love it.
Starting a science institute researching fundamental physics is my Bitcoin moon plan. Since I am still young it might play out in a few decades.
hodl
great pod! your conversation flow and honesty was refreshing. always enjoy eric’s perspective and your’s 🙏🏻
Peter your my fav bitcoin you tuber Ive learnt so much from your podcast and feel Ive grown as a human. I love how you can disagree with people and are so civil in your discourse. You care about vulnerable people and have an understanding of the plebs like me and why we need some form of centralisation you are the best positive vibes to you and your team keep on keepn on brother:)
Amazing interview. Instant fan of Mr weinstein, highly intelligent but seems very casual and relatable. Keeps it real
Sounds like you don't know much about him
Eric has the best combination of insightfulness with current events, applied academic knowledge and extrapolation to derive the most important conclusions. The fact that this intellect has such self-doubt that he does is astonishing to me, but it truly exemplifies that he really cares for both his audience and for the species as a whole.
Great interview
Best show you’ve done yet!
Video and interview quality is good, but it’s interesting you chose to set your studio with windows as the background, have you not heard of the silhouette effect??
Thank you Peter and Eric. Another interestig discussion that has me thinking of how I might capitalize on my belief in Bitcoin to help shape a better world. I've already started with those close to me. Have a good weekend!
Just listened to you with Crenshaw now you with Eric. Great job Peter!
Wow, that was so good. Really shows he prepared for this one. That is why Peter is so good, and Eric mentioned this, he adapts/learns/grows. Not allowed to coast anymore, big boy pants!
Excellent conversation, thank you
I genuinely enjoy this show. I gave some feedback on a clip video. So I’m not gonna go back over that.
But I would say that one other bit of feedback I would provide is that sometimes this host gets lost in the weeds unnecessarily. There were multiple times in this discussion where Eric was using something as an example about a broader point… But the host didn’t pick up on that. So what ended up happening was he started providing analysis of the example Eric provided as opposed to the point he was actually trying to make. I’m sure this will get better with time.
Great conversation. Just subscribed.
Thanks Eric, making the effort even if we don’t want it. (We need it)
Thank you Peter and Eric
What was the name of that island Eric mentioned?
Explain the double slit experiment to me please!! And while you're there, how about the delayed choice quantum eraser problem science seems to have!! So many questions, so few answers.
Eric seems less agitated than I've observed in recent years. Whatever changed, it's good!
this is the episode that made me subscribe
I thoroughly enjoyed this. Thank you, Peter, thank you, Eric.
Spot on on so many subjects and great interview!
Would LOVE to see Weinstein discuss BTC with Michael Saylor
Who's better at analogizing? Saylor or Weinstein? Peter, enjoyed the work as always.
Amazing conversation
awesome podcast!!!
game recognize game. you are not alone, brother Eric. We are going to have some fun for sure.
I wish Eric would just do monologues on his podcast. He’s great to listen to just discussing random ideas.
@ Peter Cormick, Eric inspired me of a great content addition, you could perhaps save shorts and special highlights as addressing ideas you cared to expand your stance, sorta A La Jordan Peterson
I think authenticity goes a long way
Great show as always
So what happens to your access to bitcoin if the internet goes out?
THIS AS A SOLID INTERVIEW!
I WANT TO TEAM UP, Dr!
Not sure what is going on with Eric, but he has changed over the last two years.
How so?
AMEN. Eric, Thank You.
Really love this conversation. I think Eric should have some conversations with someone who can make strong transcendental and metaphysical arguments. I’m curious how he would attempt to take them apart (if he could). I suspect taking that angle might help him in some way in his quest to create a new physics.
He has already written the draft version of his paper. I have read it.
There is nothing transcendental, metaphysical, spiritual or sacred about any part of it. It is serious physics.
Absolute legend. Thanks for doing this
They need to highlight their value
23:50 but Eric, if we give up the 90% that ARE well and intelligent, because we dont want to associate with the 10% that are nuts, you're throwing out potentially great things because of the few nutjobs out there... That's wrong.
If anything is objectively "wrong", that is wrong.
It'd be like abolishing universities because 1 professor in 100 are incompetent.
You throw out that 1 professor, you dont throw out the other 99 that want to make the world a better place.
“The surface layer is fine”. Same as “The fundamentals of our economy are solid”……
Good conversation
36:56 One of the common themes discussed during the dawn of the nuclear age was "Is humanity wise enough and moral enough to have this awesome, and destructive, power in it's hands?" Will we destroy ourselves? Prior to two the last two hundred years, the world had changed little fundamentally for two thousand years.
Profound thought by Eric. In less than a single human lifetime, we went from musket-shooters to having fusion weapons! I think if making an atomic device were as easy as a pipe bomb, it WOULD be the end of the world. Thank goodness it's not.
It still leaves the question, is our moral / cultural development progressing at a sufficient pace?
Is greater authoritarianism the way to safety, or more freedom and respect for the individual?
Earned yourself a sub with this one.
Has anyone actually found the CCPIU that Eric is talking about at 1:31:10 ?
I was disappointed when previously Eric had expressed disdain for UFO’s. So I was equally shocked when Eric expressed a 180 on UFO’s in this interview.
a 180? No. I fear your confirmation bias is causing you to read into his statement substances that are no present.
I've seen this evolving over the past two years. I think he is joining the larger scientific community that has grown to accept that metaphysics needs to be integrated and involves entities and/or creators larger and considerably smarter than ourselves.
This was good.
Damn I enjoyed this!
Isn't 47:35 paraphrasing the Fermi Paradox?