J. Mysliveček: Harpsichord Concerto in F major EvaM 9d:F1
Вставка
- Опубліковано 29 вер 2024
- Josef MYSLIVEČEK 1737 ― 1781
Harpsichord Concerto in F major EvaM 9d:F1:
1. Allegro con spirito
2. Larghetto 6:07
3. Tempo di minuetto 9:30
Neue Dьsseldorfer Hofmusik
Mary Utiger [direction]
Marvelous concerto! Thanks dear Nat :)
Nice to hear from you, dear Phil ;)
Classical gallantry
😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍
This concert is beautiful. Beautiful is the happy, carefree momentum of an era in which form and aesthetics were never equalised.
II movement is the masterpiece. Why has so little been said about this great composer?
Misleeweetcheck [sorry_awful I know- I just try give proper pronunciation] sounds like PCE Bach+Haydn and I really like it...
Here is the correct information about this recording.
Soloist: Christoph Anselm Noll, harpsichord • Orchestra: Neue Düsseldorfer Hofmusik (on period instruments) • Concertmaster: Mary Utiger • Live recording: 28. September 2014, WDR-Funkhaus Köln
😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍
Uroczy lekki błyskotliwy Koncert na klawesyn dziękuję
Great " Il Divino Boemo" Czech composer 🎶
Beautiful ! Thank you for posting !
Lo comparto con mi hijo que le gusta mucho el clave. Preciosa composición, por de más decir.
I didn´t know this composer, he sounds very close to Mozart, since he seems to have been contemporary to him.
In E major
Sweet, sweet harpsichord
Beautifully played! But who are the performers?
@@misssarahashplant31 You are very clever dear! but indeed it doesn't appear the name of the player of the harpsicord, unless Mary Utiger do it!
Sounds like Mozart, with a little hint of Bach here and there, to me. Interesting!
Mysliveček met Mozart around 1770 in Bologna and was very close to Mozart family until 1778 I think and for sure there's JC Bach influence cause Mozart the pupil of the great JC Bach.
For me it sounds like Haydn. And I still see fragments of the baroque style.
Let me merge a few comments here and try to offersome context. Mysliveček is one of most important composers of the period, not just a follower. He's an innovator and experimented new languages that others absorbed. Mozart was certainly influenced by Mysliveček, as well as JC Bach did, as well as Mannheimer authors did. Before his mature period Mozart was the follower of the above authors, not the other way around. Obviously he went above and beyond and became MOZART and of course he was fast (regretfully dying young). But he must be grateful to several elder masters, including Mysliveček.
Someone also cited Haydn and Baroque. IMHO Mysliveček is more akin JC Bach than Haydn but obviously FJ was the "Father" of all xviii century composers hence certainly here and there everyone gets inspired by him, including Mysliveček. Echoes of late Baroque are indeed present in Mysliveček background, especially the big innovators who bridge Baroque into Classicism, like Fasch, just to say a name but I could mention many.
Regardless, Mysliveček is an innovative composer and all mentioned influence should be seen as his toolbox to launch his craftsmanship.
Mysliveček is criminally underrated although nowadays he gets some more momentum.
"Mozart organized his musical ideas with tools - technical methods - created by his Contemporaries - successful famous composers. He had absolute hearing, and when he heard some of the work of the leading composers of those times, he tried to overcome them - the stars of Paris (Shevalie de Saint-Georges, Gluck, Gretra, Gosek, Sakini), the star of London (Johan Bah), Manhajm (Stamic) , Prague (Mislivecek, Dusek), Vienna (Ditersdorf, Salieri, Vanhal, Mihael Haydn, Joseph Haydn) , Italy (Pichini, Andrea Luchesi...)" Look at Zoran Stokić
vioti11.blogspot.com/
Yawn. he may have taught Mozart a thing or two, but the composition, despite the odd pleasant bit, is very mediocre by the standards we are accustomed to. Its hard for people to appreciate how, even well known composers of the time, were in fact very mediocre when compared to the true legends that ultimately stood out. It is rare to find a hidden gem; just because they wrote concertos and symphonies or because their style influenced Mozart it does not mean at all that they wrote particularly good music. Other than the odd violin concerto I have not come across a single really worthwhile composition by Myslivecek. But I suspect there will always be people who will hear a pleasant sound, associate it with Mozart or Haydn or Hummel or CPE Bach and deduce that the music is at the same level. Sadly, no, and I think there are probably hundreds of young student composers in the world's best conservatoires who can write this kind of music, blind folded, in a few days max, and probably make it more exciting as well.
Well, let's face it, you would know.
Some of his symphonies slow movements are lovely and certainly not dross/hack work. His solo piano compositions are also really charming.