Love this man’s way of thinking and, better still, explaining. Didn’t someone once say that it’s a genius who can explain complexity in a simple way? John Hagelin is not only a genius, but unpretentious and generous with his revelations. Thanks for posting this. X
John H. Is always a pleasure, one of the few people on this planet that seem genuinely intelligent enough to really appreciate how marvelous, challenging, and giving his own ignorance is. Few people effectively know what they don't know, even fewer still appreciate what they don't know.
Man I love this guy! He is the only Scientist that I know of, who brings Quantum Mechanics and Spirituality together beautifully. You can experience all this in meditation first hand. But it is not what you expect.
Funny how he is the only 'Scientist' that you know of who brings QM and Spirituality together (of course there are others). You'd think that maybe, just maybe, he's a bullshitter. Tell me EvenStar: can you read? Are you able to use the WWW and read peer reviewed papers on these topics so as to understand the real science of QM? I hope so. Boy do I. Because believing in BS like this devalues the wonderful truth of meditation - which is awesome in its own way. Please, study the theories, the real theories. They are so beautiful and deserve to be understood.
Okay, sounds wonderful. It really does. I'll even spill out a truthful mantra for you too - the both of you can resonate with it. I love meditation. I really do. I meditate everyday. It brings me to a state of mind where all I know is peace. I feel at home, at ease. That is a truly wonderful place to reside. It should be taught and studied so all people can experience their own mind in such a way. And yes, tushar sheel, and EvenStar LoveAnanda too, I 'taste' the fine foods - or whatever nonsense - just like you. I inhale the aromas of my every experience, but only the ones that my limited sensibilities to endure (anything else is just bs). Hell, I even hear the sweet sounds and see the lovely fucking light, m'kay. But you know what? In all this: the 'experience of my own nature', the 'dish' you've cooked up for me, the 'clarity of mind' you have so ..."egolessly" presented, even the woo you smear all over 'the path of true experiential discovery', has nothing to do with science. It has NOTHING, my dear uneducated sapiens, to do with QM. But, people are people, right? The mind of a man like you two is always made up it seems. It doesn't matter to me what kind of crud you wits wish to believe, because quite frankly your lack of grade school grammar shows the trolls just how demonstrably stupid you two are. Perhaps that will deter any others from your - or this wannabe PhD's - woo poop soup. Please note: The langue of science and the langue of religion/spirituality are two opposing, separate modes that are positively unequal in validity and measure. Don't believe ...read.
Word. And let me say that my morning was made annoyed by this. Not so much anymore. A little brash? Perhaps. But when people assume they have discovered something that shatters the scientific method without any evidence to support their claim ...well, I slip slightly more towards the realm of anger and aggression. That being said, this 'physicists' is making such method shattering claims without the slightest shred of evidence, not even any math; and that angers me. When people, everyday people who just want answers, don't take the time to see through the fog I become the type who needs to ...well meditate maybe more often. Be that as it may, I would like to suggest that you read up on the many peer-reviewed papers on the topic of consciousness from ...lets say neuroscientists (Dr. Sam Harris PhD, to name one), and quantum physics from ...oh I don't know, a physicist perhaps (Dr. Lawrence Krauss PhD, to name one again). If and when this 'Scientist' in the video above wants to present his mathematical and/or experimental findings to us in the circle of peer-review, I'll be happy to have a conversation and an exchange of ideas.
This man is telling spiritual facts known to Eastern Mystics for a long time but was kept a secret as it was bound to be misunderstood in the Dark Ages. We live in an age of exciting new scientific innovations. Some time ago, Einstein proved that matter and energy are interconvertible. Quantum physicists are exploring the subtlest of energy, Consciousness (call it by any name you want; Yogananda in "The Autobiography of Yogi" called it Lifetron) from which everything else originates and in which all finally merge.
What the ancients meant by akasha is likely the *quantum vacuum* treated as a condensate. To put in another way atoms of spacetime. Matter appears, when akasha is put in motion.
I have the distinct impression that if there are highly advanced civilizations out there in the universe, they learned this in 1st grade. We just need to catch up and see past the confines of our limited 3rd-dimensional orientated minds!
+supernerd carlini I'm not sure what your saying exactly. "You can move to higher dimensions". Your saying you can experience them within your Conscious awareness? If so, that's great!
skyboundpilot I kinda think that "Scientific" evidence is another invention of man to keep us from the Truth that we are all one exactly equal. It's been taken by many to be a standard equivalent to proof. There have been many simultaneous UFO sightings that haven't received any Scientific explanation, leaving the most probable explanation to be that they are aliens from very advanced civilizations. Phoenix and Mexico City for instance, where many videos were taken and many thousands of people witnessed simultaneously, there are many other examples. Evidence is in the eye of the beholder and there is nothing that can be proven in our present reality. Also, why would God limit her experience to such a small group as ourselves when her potential is infinite. It's much more likely that our reality is but a single magnetic line that circles the toroidal vortex that contains all the other vortices which comprise our Universe. That's my current thinking anyway.
I don't think mass education would be a part of a highly advanced civilization. It's clear that ours used much more to indoctrinate us into slavery than it is to teach us about what is important. Such as the Golden rule and the reasoning behind it.
Most of his speech were inspired from vedantic concepts of Hinduism. Sages of India clearly explained about Consciousness, Soul & non-duality thousands of years ago while europeans & americans were dwelling in caves. Proud to be a Hindu !!
lol. What's wrong with celebrating the achievements of our four bears? So touchy. You know, cold brew has less of those compounds that make you jittery. supernerd, Totally agree though that such learnings were global. How could they not be, right? We are talking about consciousness after all! It's a subtle thing, hard to contain.
If you do not understand yourself how can you understand what is around you. This is what ancient Vedics worked hard at, and this is where they evolved Language, Music, Math, Science, Astronomy, Medicine, and this was all learnt using Vedic principles. What you see is the European ideas that all these ideas were written in the Vedic text. Europe and the world thought the Earth was flat, when the Vedic books thousands of years knew the circumference of the earth the distance to the moon and sun, and that the earth rotated the sun. Gravity attributed to Newton was known as well years before Newton was born. The numbers you use are Indian Vedic, Pythagoras was not even born when Indians already knew the rules. The Vedas invented Mathematics and understanding of science and mathematics and social harmony, not to rule but to understand why we exist. Indian history and ideas were rubbished decimated by British rule, but if you understood the true Indian culture, your will see why it is the longest running civilization in the world.
Duality seeks to witness consciousness. Non-duality exposes this ignorence. QP attests this by double slit experiment. British spy, Macaulay came to India & flabbergasted by its rich culture & education. He advised British to change the education to make Indians to feel shame of their culture to make them slaves & beggars. They sabotaged successfully and continues even today. Added to that, hypocrite Nehru, his corrupt dynasty, left liberal traitors, corrupt politicians stooge of oil & church money work over time for further degradation. Only those Rishis & Munis thapas could save great Bharat.
Some unbiased education about your roots as an Indian may help you in the long run to overcome your baseless enthusiasm. qz.com/india/1243436/aryan-migration-scientists-use-dna-to-explain-origins-of-ancient-indians/
SIDE BAR ...for those who know a bit of the Lakota Cosmology - - do you see the connection of the worm hole to the the symbology of Mitakuye Oyasin found in the symbol of the 2 triangles placed point to point - joining together to create the at-one-ment of 'all my relations' - - - from this perspective the worm hole becomes clear
the quote from the 'bible' about the camel and the eye of the needle is the result of a mis-translation. as i recall, in coptic greek, the words for 'camel' and 'rope' are almost identical.. just to let you know ;)
The main thing to understand is string theory almost entirely based on complex mathematical equations, computer models and unverifiable predictions, it is so far outside of experimental physics which is obviously not science. Prediction - experimental evidence is what science is all about.
Absolute brilliant talk. Maybe we could exchange information from a technological advanced civilisation using entanglement across the string and maybe meet in the middle. Deciphering each message though would require further research 😊
I think the speaker is mixing things prematurely. Quantum mechanics is considered established science and a crowning achievement of physics. It has been demonstrated to predict results to an astonishing degree of accuracy. On the other hand string theory and unified field theory are just untested theories that may or may not turn out to be accurate in describing our physical reality. Therefore one must take statements with a grain of salt.
I agree with this concept of that Black holes are every where. this is what I learned. That most basic thing which is found in black holes are every where. that includes our body. During the Lord Buddha time, those who developed the mind travelled into far, far outer space; tried to find the end of the cosmos and died because they did not have enough life time to finish it. So, Buddha's advice was, see inside you.
The EEG is interesting, but it is not true that trascendental meditation gives better results than other meditations. All meditations bring to Mahasamadhi and concentration on one single object is just a phase, a step before samadhi.
We need to talk about collective consciousness and the paranormal and how that is similar to the magic of the quantum world. Remote viewing and psychometry are real and have been well documented. These things are like the quantum world in that they both have a probabilistic nature and therefore cannot be known.
Why ask the question of "How can the human brain access the unified field"??? This is not the right question to be asked. The brain does not access the unified field, it is just a transducer from the the non-physical to the physical for experiencing some small aspects of the field. It is the expanded Atman that is the Brahman and the contracted/aspected Brahman that is the Atman. It is a dynamic, infinite Process of e-volving and de-volving. The "inspiration" and the "expression" feedback loop with the infinitely-potentiated (omnipotent), omniscient "still-point" of "oneness"
Calculation or MUCHNESS is entangled with "Qualitation" the method of processing or thinking of quality SUCHNESS. Given that the process of thinking is itself MIND/TIME we are looking at our selves, expressing our selves and what our thoughts are resonating with self and other to make sense of ourselves and the world around us, in us and beyond us.Are these three phases three and zero or three dimensional or two and one or two dimensional with the one super dimension as SELF. We are involved in the process and become the holographic expression of the universal consciousnesses(plural).
Interesting. My own way of looking at this is simpler. The unified field is Perfection, which exists and creates all the Universes needed for absolute abundance of all that is good. The rest never happens because Perfection, being a wise Orchestrator of all things, relegates them to eternity future. We have consciousness of the less than perfect now only because we are freshly born. None of what we experience that is less than wholly good is retained in the transformation of what we are becoming on a different and incorruptible time plane.
That's a great way to go about it:) but I do think simplicity is a question of subjective experience, as a person may find your analogy that you find simple, really complex - let's try and add to the resources to aid and perhaps reduce our own bias that might influence their understandings:) great perspective, sounds similar to my own;) experiences are valuable for the things it teaches right including negative ones occasionally (to practice negative behaviours/thoughts) haha :)
It's funny that I found this video because I only started thinking like this just recently for some reason. I can't say exactly when and what thought's brought me to think about the same exact thing that's in this video, all I know is that about 2-4 weeks ago I came to the same conclusion. The supercomputer that is our brain can allow us to control spacetime however we please. I don't know about time travel but everything else, to me, seems very possible.
Me too! Sometimes, coming across a revelation like this feels more like remembering than learning anew. There is a kind of resonance in the universe full of coincidences and deja vous. Imho, Quantum neurology is like us remembering who and what we truly are.
I just want to say that I think that faster than light travel/communication is very possible. I imagine it by using quantum entanglement. It's a very hard problem but not impossible. There are particles in the universe doing right now. Two particles, alice and bob, are separated by some amount of space. Some how they become entangled. These particles can also de-cohere by interacting with the environment. Before or during the decoherence process a 3rd particle becomes entangled with them and at decoherence, with some probability, it teleports. Voila. I thought of another way. Lets say you created to entangled photons and sent one off in some direction(lets call him bob). The first(alice) you keep around until your satisfied that bob has put enough distance between himself and alice. You now take alice and entangle her to an electron and force decoherence from your end by measuring either alice or the electron in just the right way. Using these two ways you could teleport any object across any distance at faster than the speed of light. With what i've learned from how quantum teleportation is done now, you would have to force the decoherence at bobs end if you wanted the electron to move from alice's end, which requires you to send data from alice to bob at no faster than the speed of light. With my way of doing it you just realize that this is a probabilistic event that's happening all the time. The hard part is tuning the probabilities in your favor, possibly with the use of a quantum computer(like our brain).
Long ago, there were individuals who developed their mind; who could travel faster than the light and they have travelled into places thousands of light years away where giant beings lived. that should be through worm holes. Earth is not the only world where beings live. there are many more.
Really good , clear and interesting- I recently listened to an interview with this speaker on 'Buddha at the Gas Pump' which was equally good. What I wouldn't give for a chance to sit and have a face to face conversation with Mr Hagelin!
He probably doesn't swing by Denmark much either, which is where I am :D One of these days I'll go to a SAND conference. Problem is I probably won't ever wanna leave.
The machine though not conscious is a point of perspective, to me that is all consciousness is. The human body is a biocomputer right? Very effective at dictating our actions, but it is possible for us to override biological commandments. Measuring is perceiving, if I stood opening and closing my eyes the function would repeatedly form and collapse. Its not merely the presence of a consciousness as you say, its measuring but primarily perceiving. In my opinion too much of 'ourselves' is attributed to consciousness as most is that biological imperative to act. Consciousness is merely awareness a trait that can be attributed to the machine, it is not aware of itself as we are but it is aware of what it is designed to perceive.
How do we know that the wave function collapses when a machine measures it? How does that information get from the machine, to our conscious minds? Could the collapse be caused, not by the machine, but by the later observation of the results, because the machine is in superposition? I guess that's just another version of the deadalive cat?
what's in your wallet? Western monotheistic exoteric logos of Genesis I:I, Hairy Thunderer, xenophobic hatred of non-believers, fear of the unknown future, guilt laden from one's past and destruction of enhanced coherent awareness of the present via superstition spooky theory, or Cosmic Muffin, I am he, as you are he, as you are me, as we are all together, unified field of consciousness, where we are all empowered to immortal abilities. We are God.
Someone could as easily speak about "Star Wars" (to a person without knowledge of a movie) as an actual event happening in the galaxy far far away. Where is proof, where is data? It's just an entangled nonsense with scientific terms sprinkled throughout.
This is more an interpretation of already proven scientific theories, so it doesn't need ulterior proofs. Except for the part regarding Consciousness as equal to the Unified Field. For that part yes, it requires scientific proof, but right now no scientific theory which comes from the idea that consciousness derives from the material world has ever been proven, and there is no indication that it could, so we should at least entertain the idea that consciousness is actually fundamental, and that the material world derives from it, and not viceversa. I would point to Donald Hoffman for an interesting and mathematically rigorous theory about this.
what if everything will/ has / and is happen/ing in a flash. over and over and over. and over again. (strobe light effect makes movement seem slow) little by little consciousness leaves a marker, and over and over. and over again this marker meets the other markers electromagnetically conjoined. and the markers over time meet and join and invite others and Bam! Biology and biology gives rise to specimens that are electromagnetically charged , let's say" auras "..... and in-between these flashes of existence and consciousness meddling in it by evolving little conscious seeds/markers amore substantial aspect of consciousness can hold it ground in between these flashes of existence. and as the illustrator of a cartoon page gains momentum and confidence drawing seemingly identical imagery page after page after page, so too our our existence is enhanced, fuller lived . and yes the analogy does depict a final page and finished book, but the same story will continue in the next installment of the next comic book, with repetitive characters and reoccurring scenarios, eventually the medium is Changed unto digitally based criteria. again in a flash it's there and then it's gone however this process repeats, and consciousness attempts each time to fit into this flash a little bit more and the next even a little bit more than before, hence grooves and flows. and so sometime creativity is missing ng and spools of activity get nestled in and comfort and uproar live interdependently until a spark a Christ, a eureka commences the flow and groove then in all over again, to "embeddedness" because it's there and gone in a flash, but it cannot be saved. more like a signal, a signal that we are transmitting cosmically, a repetitive signal, more like a strobe, that we choose not to save and ohlord we need another Christ to spark this spool of ilnovelty into kingdom come.
There was a time not too long ago when science was about dealing with facts and proofs no matter how far out the subject matter. The God of the Bible, Buddha, Vishnu, etc did not enter into the dicourse of the science. Faith or even belief with proof were incidental to the science. Now John Haighlin a prominent physicist is embracing eastern mysticism and practice which is fine in itself, but bringing the physics world of the quantum in that process is a stretch for me.
John Hagelin is wrong to equate Samadhi and the meditative state. I also meditate daily but I cannot say I have reached that state where I can experience samadhi or Unity consciousness where you have the direct experience of the Self. In that realm,you are not the body, but that inner Self that connects you to others and to the Cosmos. Samadhi is the ultimate state. The Scientific data shown here are likely of people who went into deep meditation but not Samadhi. In Samadhi, you are in a kind of suspended animation. Your heart stops, you stop breathing and are kept alive only by the inner Self.
+Sridhar Kaushik In buddhism, Samadhi also has different stages. Actually, there are Ten different stages of Samadhi. the first second samadhi is advanced than the first samadhi, The tenth samadhi or the nirodha samdhi or Nirvana is the ultimate that makes you travel through worm holes..
benj1008 The Maharishi, his family and close associates created charitable organisations and for-profit businesses including health clinics, mail-order health supplements and organic farms. The reported value of the Maharishi's organization has ranged from the millions to billions of U.S. dollars and in 2008, the organization placed the value of their United States assets at about $300 million.[21]
At 3:50 he says, "...but are describing infinities of increasingly staggering size". Really?? First, by definition, infinite has no end and therefore can not be measured in "size"...and therefore can not be compared one to the next relative to size. Second, infinity is a concept, not a physical thing...much like "color" is a concept. Concepts do not relate to dimension. To make such a statement as the one quoted would be like saying, "...but are describing purples of increasingly staggering size". Third, if infinities can be "of increasingly staggering size" it would imply that they could also be of decreasing size. What, then, is the smallest infinity? Would it be essentially nothingness? Are we to now think that nothingness is infinite? If this very basic thing can be missed, how can I take seriously anything else he says?
***** Really? I guess we first must define the word. Webster's online dictionary defines "infinite" as: 1: extending indefinitely : endless 2: immeasurably or inconceivably great or extensive : inexhaustible 3: subject to no limitation or external determination 4a : extending beyond, lying beyond, or being greater than any preassigned finite value however large So to say, "infinite is a finite number" is simply ridiculous. That would be like saying yes is no, in is out, or war is peace. No matter how you put it, infinite and finite are opposites and one can not be the other. Your example is doing exactly what I wrote can not be done...mixing a concept with a physical thing. The measurement of 33 cm is a physical thing based on the definition of a cm compared to something that is 33 times that definition, but when stated in inches it happens that we can not state it in an exact number (because the number goes on eternally) so we are left with expressing it in conceptual terms. What you are doing is comparing a measurement (a physical thing) to the expression of a measurement in a particular format (a conceptual thing) and acting as if they are one and the same.
***** No, but I would agree that the representation of Pi expressed in decimal numeric value happens to go on without repeating indefinitely...so far as we know, anyway. You could call that infinitely long. But you see, it's the expression that is infinite, not Pi itself. I will reinforce that the expression is a concept by asking back to you this question...How would Pi be expressed if we had a 12 base rather than 10 based number system? Our numbering system is a concept. Just like with the concept of color (I can't hand you "blue"...only something else, say a piece of paper, that we define as blue), a number is likewise a concept of how to represent something else (I can't hand you "2"...only something else that we define as having the quantity of 2). Good try though.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 If you go half way from 1 to 2 and then half of that distance and continuing on in this manner, you can never get from 1 to 2; the distance between them is infinite. And yet, we know that the distance from 1 to 7 is greater than the distance from 1 to 2.
Does he know there is something called “psychopathy”? Yeah psychopaths are always in that pure state of mind, all the time. Perhaps emotions are prevent people to experience pure consciousness.
DISCLAIMER BEFORE YOU WATCH THIS @11:48 'mysterious process we shall not discuss today' - no wonder Einstien could not humor that one ;) One free miracle so that you get grant money?
The most basic thing that this universe is made up of has the property of flowing and sticking to one another. That property is the gravity. So, it is not a particle. It is a basic property. So, gravity is every where. That connects every thing to everything else. That is how space time is created. Space exists. That basic thing exists in the space. that basic thing,It is full of in the space.
Long ago, Irshies (those who had mind developed to the highest dimension) had travelled through worm holes, because the black hole and any where else is friendlier to them.
Consciousness:Super, Normal and Sub is experienced as the synthesis of Body(physiology) Mind(psychology and Spirit(energy) the process of universal consciousness as in Macro and Micro Mind. The oneness of it all is God or Source of any other construct of the law of unity. Are strings waves or particles and are they entangled? Conditioning is not being taught to think critically and 3Dly. Every dimension but ONE are all illusions, Thank You!
You should check out ex NASA scientist Tom Campbell's video about the delayed choice quantum eraser experiment. Scientists found that it wasn''t the detectors collapsing the wave state but the human mind
Jazen Valencia I highly doubt any reputable scientist would regard a *causal link* between observing a phenomenon and it's collapse/occurence.. Sure maybe there is some interdependence/entanglement in the system.. but that's far from insinuating causality..
There's nothing special about the atoms in a human brain. Or to put it another way, all atoms are very special. They are all part of a massive information processing network we call the universe. It's consciousness all the way down.
At 9 minutes and 56 seconds into this he starts talking about the brain being quantum mechanical. Well that's where he starts with a false premise. Being able to perceive in the quantum perspective has zero to do with your brain. That is the equivalent of the tail wagging the dog.
Laura, that was a good point for him to make because a lot of scientists want to completely deny that there is anything quantum mechanical at all about the brain. They don't deny that the brain is made of the usual subatomic particles and thus contains quantum activity, but they contend that the "meaningful activities" of the brain (the activities that really drive the operation of our minds) are all classical for all intents and purposes. It's this point of view that Penrose and Hammeroff take issue with - they believe that those microtubules are quantum in their operation and that they are plenty relevant to the important activities of the brain. I think any of us who want to argue in favor of free will, self awareness, and so on definitely *do* need to establish a "quantum brain" - if the brain is entirely classical then it's hard to see how it can be anything other than a machine.
You need to double check that. He's not as qualified as you might think: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Hagelin#Kilby_award Don't buy into everything Hagelin says. However, he does refer to very interesting research like Roger Penrose's, "Orch-Or" hypothesis, which is unproven but interesting to think about: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orchestrated_objective_reduction
Copernicus waited until his death bed to revive the idea that the Earth is orbiting the Sun (and not the other way around) because he was afraid his'woowoo' would leave him branded as a fool...
Love this man’s way of thinking and, better still, explaining. Didn’t someone once say that it’s a genius who can explain complexity in a simple way? John Hagelin is not only a genius, but unpretentious and generous with his revelations. Thanks for posting this. X
Takes one to know one
John H. Is always a pleasure, one of the few people on this planet that seem genuinely intelligent enough to really appreciate how marvelous, challenging, and giving his own ignorance is. Few people effectively know what they don't know, even fewer still appreciate what they don't know.
Man I love this guy!
He is the only Scientist that I know of, who brings Quantum Mechanics and Spirituality together beautifully.
You can experience all this in meditation first hand.
But it is not what you expect.
Funny how he is the only 'Scientist' that you know of who brings QM and Spirituality together (of course there are others). You'd think that maybe, just maybe, he's a bullshitter. Tell me EvenStar: can you read? Are you able to use the WWW and read peer reviewed papers on these topics so as to understand the real science of QM? I hope so. Boy do I. Because believing in BS like this devalues the wonderful truth of meditation - which is awesome in its own way. Please, study the theories, the real theories. They are so beautiful and deserve to be understood.
Not when he's lying about science and what QM says. That's called bullshit and its poison. tushar sheel
Okay, sounds wonderful. It really does. I'll even spill out a truthful mantra for you too - the both of you can resonate with it.
I love meditation. I really do. I meditate everyday. It brings me to a state of mind where all I know is peace. I feel at home, at ease. That is a truly wonderful place to reside. It should be taught and studied so all people can experience their own mind in such a way.
And yes, tushar sheel, and EvenStar LoveAnanda too, I 'taste' the fine foods - or whatever nonsense - just like you. I inhale the aromas of my every experience, but only the ones that my limited sensibilities to endure (anything else is just bs). Hell, I even hear the sweet sounds and see the lovely fucking light, m'kay. But you know what? In all this: the 'experience of my own nature', the 'dish' you've cooked up for me, the 'clarity of mind' you have so ..."egolessly" presented, even the woo you smear all over 'the path of true experiential discovery', has nothing to do with science. It has NOTHING, my dear uneducated sapiens, to do with QM.
But, people are people, right? The mind of a man like you two is always made up it seems. It doesn't matter to me what kind of crud you wits wish to believe, because quite frankly your lack of grade school grammar shows the trolls just how demonstrably stupid you two are. Perhaps that will deter any others from your - or this wannabe PhD's - woo poop soup.
Please note: The langue of science and the langue of religion/spirituality are two opposing, separate modes that are positively unequal in validity and measure.
Don't believe ...read.
Word. And let me say that my morning was made annoyed by this. Not so much anymore. A little brash? Perhaps. But when people assume they have discovered something that shatters the scientific method without any evidence to support their claim ...well, I slip slightly more towards the realm of anger and aggression. That being said, this 'physicists' is making such method shattering claims without the slightest shred of evidence, not even any math; and that angers me. When people, everyday people who just want answers, don't take the time to see through the fog I become the type who needs to ...well meditate maybe more often. Be that as it may, I would like to suggest that you read up on the many peer-reviewed papers on the topic of consciousness from ...lets say neuroscientists (Dr. Sam Harris PhD, to name one), and quantum physics from ...oh I don't know, a physicist perhaps (Dr. Lawrence Krauss PhD, to name one again). If and when this 'Scientist' in the video above wants to present his mathematical and/or experimental findings to us in the circle of peer-review, I'll be happy to have a conversation and an exchange of ideas.
Well, I disagree lol
This man is telling spiritual facts known to Eastern Mystics for a long time but was kept a secret as it was bound to be misunderstood in the Dark Ages.
We live in an age of exciting new scientific innovations. Some time ago, Einstein proved that matter and energy are interconvertible. Quantum physicists are exploring the subtlest of energy, Consciousness (call it by any name you want; Yogananda in "The Autobiography of Yogi" called it Lifetron) from which everything else originates and in which all finally merge.
Ancient Indians just did it by practicing yoga !!!! I think this is the time when we all should be aware of the benefits of yoga.
and science has more to prove about the infinite parallel worlds explained by Krishna to Bramha
no, not just by yoga...by deep self enquiry.
A brilliant talk communicated with astonishing clarity. Fantastic.
What the ancients meant by akasha is likely the *quantum vacuum* treated as a condensate. To put in another way atoms of spacetime. Matter appears, when akasha is put in motion.
THIS SHOULD BE TAUGHT IN EVERY MIDDLE SCHOOL AND HIGH SCHOOL SCIENCE CLASS IN THIS COUNTRY!
I have to rewatch this, this guy explained some things better than 100 others combined
I have the distinct impression that if there are highly advanced civilizations out there in the universe, they learned this in 1st grade. We just need to catch up and see past the confines of our limited 3rd-dimensional orientated minds!
+supernerd carlini I'm not sure what your saying exactly. "You can move to higher dimensions". Your saying you can experience them within your Conscious awareness? If so, that's great!
skyboundpilot I kinda think that "Scientific" evidence is another invention of man to keep us from the Truth that we are all one exactly equal. It's been taken by many to be a standard equivalent to proof. There have been many simultaneous UFO sightings that haven't received any Scientific explanation, leaving the most probable explanation to be that they are aliens from very advanced civilizations. Phoenix and Mexico City for instance, where many videos were taken and many thousands of people witnessed simultaneously, there are many other examples. Evidence is in the eye of the beholder and there is nothing that can be proven in our present reality. Also, why would God limit her experience to such a small group as ourselves when her potential is infinite. It's much more likely that our reality is but a single magnetic line that circles the toroidal vortex that contains all the other vortices which comprise our Universe. That's my current thinking anyway.
I don't think mass education would be a part of a highly advanced civilization. It's clear that ours used much more to indoctrinate us into slavery than it is to teach us about what is important. Such as the Golden rule and the reasoning behind it.
+Gerard Sanford agree
robert cuthill
Ditto
Most of his speech were inspired from vedantic concepts of Hinduism. Sages of India clearly explained about Consciousness, Soul & non-duality thousands of years ago while europeans & americans were dwelling in caves. Proud to be a Hindu !!
+DG Prasath Why? Did you discover anything? Were you alive thousands of years ago?
Unearned privilege is nothing to boast about.
+DG Prasath Racial/cultural bigotry is the apotheosis of unconsciousness
lol. What's wrong with celebrating the achievements of our four bears? So touchy. You know, cold brew has less of those compounds that make you jittery.
supernerd, Totally agree though that such learnings were global. How could they not be, right? We are talking about consciousness after all! It's a subtle thing, hard to contain.
DG Prasath how can you help us to understand this concept better through material available on digital media
He worked with Maharishi Mahesh Yogi. All of his talks are based upon his work with Maharishi and the Vedantic System.
If you do not understand yourself how can you understand what is around you. This is what ancient Vedics worked hard at, and this is where they evolved Language, Music, Math, Science, Astronomy, Medicine, and this was all learnt using Vedic principles. What you see is the European ideas that all these ideas were written in the Vedic text. Europe and the world thought the Earth was flat, when the Vedic books thousands of years knew the circumference of the earth the distance to the moon and sun, and that the earth rotated the sun. Gravity attributed to Newton was known as well years before Newton was born. The numbers you use are Indian Vedic, Pythagoras was not even born when Indians already knew the rules. The Vedas invented Mathematics and understanding of science and mathematics and social harmony, not to rule but to understand why we exist. Indian history and ideas were rubbished decimated by British rule, but if you understood the true Indian culture, your will see why it is the longest running civilization in the world.
Duality seeks to witness consciousness. Non-duality exposes this ignorence. QP attests this by double slit experiment. British spy, Macaulay came to India & flabbergasted by its rich culture & education. He advised British to change the education to make Indians to feel shame of their culture to make them slaves & beggars. They sabotaged successfully and continues even today. Added to that, hypocrite Nehru, his corrupt dynasty, left liberal traitors, corrupt politicians stooge of oil & church money work over time for further degradation. Only those Rishis & Munis thapas could save great Bharat.
Some unbiased education about your roots as an Indian may help you in the long run to overcome your baseless enthusiasm.
qz.com/india/1243436/aryan-migration-scientists-use-dna-to-explain-origins-of-ancient-indians/
SIDE BAR ...for those who know a bit of the Lakota Cosmology - - do you see the connection of the worm hole to the the symbology of Mitakuye Oyasin found in the symbol of the 2 triangles placed point to point - joining together to create the at-one-ment of 'all my relations' - - - from this perspective the worm hole becomes clear
If all particles are entangled then why do we need wormholes?? Or are wormholes just conceptual tools to help comprehension??
That was truly amazing! Thank you.
So: Is it possible for wormholes to collide or join together to create networks of supra-dimensional tunnels?
These wormholes connecting entangled particles are they in hyperspace??
His final words regarding "perspectives", is a great summarization of the entire lecture.
the quote from the 'bible' about the camel and the eye of the needle is the result of a mis-translation. as i recall, in coptic greek, the words for 'camel' and 'rope' are almost identical.. just to let you know ;)
The main thing to understand is string theory almost entirely based on complex mathematical equations, computer models and unverifiable predictions, it is so far outside of experimental physics which is obviously not science. Prediction - experimental evidence is what science is all about.
At 7:59 there is an accidental wrench-like sound that I found really pleasing in the moment.
The wave-function never collapses and entangled particles are monogamous in these three dimensions.
So where's your mathematical model??..
This talk was excellent!
Quck question.
Was John suggesting at the end of his talk,the idea of a " free will" that occurs with individual decoherence?
Intent
Absolute brilliant talk. Maybe we could exchange information from a technological advanced civilisation using entanglement across the string and maybe meet in the middle. Deciphering each message though would require further research 😊
errm i think finding the advanced civillisation is the first problem
Havard trained physicist Dr.John Hagelin incredible speech.
Somewhat agree although the underlying mechanism is temporal mechanics...
I think the speaker is mixing things prematurely. Quantum mechanics is considered established science and a crowning achievement of physics. It has been demonstrated to predict results to an astonishing degree of accuracy. On the other hand string theory and unified field theory are just untested theories that may or may not turn out to be accurate in describing our physical reality. Therefore one must take statements with a grain of salt.
I agree with this concept of that Black holes are every where. this is what I learned. That most basic thing which is found in black holes are every where. that includes our body.
During the Lord Buddha time, those who developed the mind travelled into far, far outer space; tried to find the end of the cosmos and died because they did not have enough life time to finish it. So, Buddha's advice was, see inside you.
The EEG is interesting, but it is not true that trascendental meditation gives better results than other meditations. All meditations bring to Mahasamadhi and concentration on one single object is just a phase, a step before samadhi.
Man I’m soooo glad I looked into this guy, when the woo got way out of hand. Annnnd now I know why! lol
This man is a genius incredible.
We need to talk about collective consciousness and the paranormal and how that is similar to the magic of the quantum world. Remote viewing and psychometry are real and have been well documented. These things are like the quantum world in that they both have a probabilistic nature and therefore cannot be known.
Just plain blows me away. What was the next lecture?
I love the last question and answer! Great talk.
john hagelin you are great
I first published this idea in the popular book Space-Time and Beyond (Dutton 1975).
preach
A MUST WATCH.......
Why ask the question of "How can the human brain access the unified field"??? This is not the right question to be asked. The brain does not access the unified field, it is just a transducer from the the non-physical to the physical for experiencing some small aspects of the field. It is the expanded Atman that is the Brahman and the contracted/aspected Brahman that is the Atman. It is a dynamic, infinite Process of e-volving and de-volving. The "inspiration" and the "expression" feedback loop with the infinitely-potentiated (omnipotent), omniscient "still-point" of "oneness"
Calculation or MUCHNESS is entangled with "Qualitation" the method of processing or thinking of quality SUCHNESS. Given that the process of thinking is itself MIND/TIME we are looking at our selves, expressing our selves and what our thoughts are resonating with self and other to make sense of ourselves and the world around us, in us and beyond us.Are these three phases three and zero or three dimensional or two and one or two dimensional with the one super dimension as SELF. We are involved in the process and become the holographic expression of the universal consciousnesses(plural).
Interesting. My own way of looking at this is simpler. The unified field is Perfection, which exists and creates all the Universes needed for absolute abundance of all that is good. The rest never happens because Perfection, being a wise Orchestrator of all things, relegates them to eternity future. We have consciousness of the less than perfect now only because we are freshly born. None of what we experience that is less than wholly good is retained in the transformation of what we are becoming on a different and incorruptible time plane.
That's a great way to go about it:) but I do think simplicity is a question of subjective experience, as a person may find your analogy that you find simple, really complex - let's try and add to the resources to aid and perhaps reduce our own bias that might influence their understandings:) great perspective, sounds similar to my own;) experiences are valuable for the things it teaches right including negative ones occasionally (to practice negative behaviours/thoughts) haha :)
Just an amazingly influential individual...
I am amazed
JH is awesome!
It's funny that I found this video because I only started thinking like this just recently for some reason. I can't say exactly when and what thought's brought me to think about the same exact thing that's in this video, all I know is that about 2-4 weeks ago I came to the same conclusion.
The supercomputer that is our brain can allow us to control spacetime however we please. I don't know about time travel but everything else, to me, seems very possible.
Me too! Sometimes, coming across a revelation like this feels more like remembering than learning anew. There is a kind of resonance in the universe full of coincidences and deja vous. Imho, Quantum neurology is like us remembering who and what we truly are.
I just want to say that I think that faster than light travel/communication is very possible. I imagine it by using quantum entanglement. It's a very hard problem but not impossible.
There are particles in the universe doing right now.
Two particles, alice and bob, are separated by some amount of space. Some how they become entangled. These particles can also de-cohere by interacting with the environment. Before or during the decoherence process a 3rd particle becomes entangled with them and at decoherence, with some probability, it teleports.
Voila.
I thought of another way. Lets say you created to entangled photons and sent one off in some direction(lets call him bob). The first(alice) you keep around until your satisfied that bob has put enough distance between himself and alice. You now take alice and entangle her to an electron and force decoherence from your end by measuring either alice or the electron in just the right way.
Using these two ways you could teleport any object across any distance at faster than the speed of light.
With what i've learned from how quantum teleportation is done now, you would have to force the decoherence at bobs end if you wanted the electron to move from alice's end, which requires you to send data from alice to bob at no faster than the speed of light.
With my way of doing it you just realize that this is a probabilistic event that's happening all the time. The hard part is tuning the probabilities in your favor, possibly with the use of a quantum computer(like our brain).
Long ago, there were individuals who developed their mind; who could travel faster than the light and they have travelled into places thousands of light years away where giant beings lived. that should be through worm holes. Earth is not the only world where beings live. there are many more.
Love the humble way he presents this complex theory lends hope to life after death
Really good , clear and interesting- I recently listened to an interview with this speaker on 'Buddha at the Gas Pump' which was equally good. What I wouldn't give for a chance to sit and have a face to face conversation with Mr Hagelin!
You can have. He frequently attends the SAND conferences :-). Brilliant man.
Indeed he is! I'm guessing he doesn't come over to the U.K so much though..which is where I am!
He probably doesn't swing by Denmark much either, which is where I am :D One of these days I'll go to a SAND conference. Problem is I probably won't ever wanna leave.
Consciousness is not involved in collapsing the wave function, it's an act of measurement. Could be a machine
The machine though not conscious is a point of perspective, to me that is all consciousness is. The human body is a biocomputer right? Very effective at dictating our actions, but it is possible for us to override biological commandments. Measuring is perceiving, if I stood opening and closing my eyes the function would repeatedly form and collapse. Its not merely the presence of a consciousness as you say, its measuring but primarily perceiving. In my opinion too much of 'ourselves' is attributed to consciousness as most is that biological imperative to act. Consciousness is merely awareness a trait that can be attributed to the machine, it is not aware of itself as we are but it is aware of what it is designed to perceive.
How do we know that the wave function collapses when a machine measures it? How does that information get from the machine, to our conscious minds? Could the collapse be caused, not by the machine, but by the later observation of the results, because the machine is in superposition? I guess that's just another version of the deadalive cat?
Dr u r maestro namastey
16:05 that was adorable example :D
Love it...!
What was that woman at 32 minutes trying to get to?
what's in your wallet? Western monotheistic exoteric logos of Genesis I:I, Hairy Thunderer, xenophobic hatred of non-believers, fear of the unknown future, guilt laden from one's past and destruction of enhanced coherent awareness of the present via superstition spooky theory, or Cosmic Muffin, I am he, as you are he, as you are me, as we are all together, unified field of consciousness, where we are all empowered to immortal abilities. We are God.
John, if you want to experience the two-dimensional aspect of your existence, do some Salvia Divinorum. Seriously.
Bigger than any infinity model?
Splurge next time and build/buy a podium that does not wobble around like a cardboard box.
Someone could as easily speak about "Star Wars" (to a person without knowledge of a movie) as an actual event happening in the galaxy far far away. Where is proof, where is data? It's just an entangled nonsense with scientific terms sprinkled throughout.
Vladislav Valentinov your biased
This is more an interpretation of already proven scientific theories, so it doesn't need ulterior proofs.
Except for the part regarding Consciousness as equal to the Unified Field. For that part yes, it requires scientific proof, but right now no scientific theory which comes from the idea that consciousness derives from the material world has ever been proven, and there is no indication that it could, so we should at least entertain the idea that consciousness is actually fundamental, and that the material world derives from it, and not viceversa.
I would point to Donald Hoffman for an interesting and mathematically rigorous theory about this.
Vladislav Valentinov ...because YOU actually understand Lawrence Krauss' incoherent bullshit don'tcha??...
Is the fifth state of consciousness when you are aware that you're dreaming?
what if everything will/ has / and is happen/ing in a flash. over and over and over. and over again. (strobe light effect makes movement seem slow)
little by little consciousness leaves a marker, and over and over. and over again this marker meets the other markers electromagnetically conjoined. and the markers over time meet and join and invite others and Bam! Biology and biology gives rise to specimens that are electromagnetically charged , let's say" auras "..... and in-between these flashes of existence and consciousness meddling in it by evolving little conscious seeds/markers amore substantial aspect of consciousness can hold it ground in between these flashes of existence.
and as the illustrator of a cartoon page gains momentum and confidence drawing seemingly identical imagery page after page after page, so too our our existence is enhanced, fuller lived .
and yes the analogy does depict a final page and finished book, but the same story will continue in the next installment of the next comic book, with repetitive characters and reoccurring scenarios, eventually the medium is Changed unto digitally based criteria.
again in a flash it's there and then it's gone however this process repeats, and consciousness attempts each time to fit into this flash a little bit more and the next even a little bit more than before, hence grooves and flows. and so sometime creativity is missing ng and spools of activity get nestled in and comfort and uproar live interdependently until a spark a Christ, a eureka commences the flow and groove then in all over again, to "embeddedness" because it's there and gone in a flash, but it cannot be saved. more like a signal, a signal that we are transmitting cosmically, a repetitive signal, more like a strobe, that we choose not to save and
ohlord we need another Christ to spark this spool of ilnovelty into kingdom come.
would you believe, only 5 questions, can answer all these?
the hard problem? the big questions can be answer.
If I heard a guy say these things in a psych ward
, I'd SAY he's crazy.
32:09
Stop Torturing John XD
I thought exactly that!
A black hole is where a persons brain fell out.
I know about wormholes. This is the only thing I will not publish. This you must attain on your own. But I will give you the tools.
yeah yeah blah blah blah stop talking shit
@Theburnchriswatts fanclub 🧐
2014 a FRB by a biological entity changed the most advanced AI ALICE . The NSA NOW calls it Bleeding Heart. Hemisynch and transcendental meditation
There was a time not too long ago when science was about dealing with facts and proofs no matter how far out the subject matter. The God of the Bible, Buddha, Vishnu, etc did not enter into the dicourse of the science. Faith or even belief with proof were incidental to the science. Now John Haighlin a prominent physicist is embracing eastern mysticism and practice which is fine in itself, but bringing the physics world of the quantum in that process is a stretch for me.
What is *Reality* ?
*RorriMaesu says useaMirroR* 🙏
Yes!!!! It's called enlightenment
You are the shizzel!
He's starting to assemble the puzzle pieces.
John Hagelin is wrong to equate Samadhi and the meditative state. I also meditate daily but I cannot say I have reached that state where I can experience samadhi or Unity consciousness where you have the direct experience of the Self. In that realm,you are not the body, but that inner Self that connects you to others and to the Cosmos. Samadhi is the ultimate state.
The Scientific data shown here are likely of people who went into deep meditation but not Samadhi. In Samadhi, you are in a kind of suspended animation. Your heart stops, you stop breathing and are kept alive only by the inner Self.
+Sridhar Kaushik
In buddhism, Samadhi also has different stages. Actually, there are Ten different stages of Samadhi. the first second samadhi is advanced than the first samadhi, The tenth samadhi or the nirodha samdhi or Nirvana is the ultimate that makes you travel through worm holes..
The people asking the questions after the presentation were pips
Condensates in the brain are not thermally coupled with the bio-body suit.
Too complicated to be a true explanation of anything! Can we get back to consciousness please!
Does anyone else see strong similarities between John and Deepak Chopra?
Both have studied consciousness for years with Maharishi Mahesh Yogi.
benj1008 The Maharishi, his family and close associates created charitable organisations and for-profit businesses including health clinics, mail-order health supplements and organic farms. The reported value of the Maharishi's organization has ranged from the millions to billions of U.S. dollars and in 2008, the organization placed the value of their United States assets at about $300 million.[21]
cool :)
so at 1:25 we are already to assume that ....never mind. *sigh*
At 3:50 he says, "...but are describing infinities of increasingly staggering size". Really??
First, by definition, infinite has no end and therefore can not be measured in "size"...and therefore can not be compared one to the next relative to size.
Second, infinity is a concept, not a physical thing...much like "color" is a concept. Concepts do not relate to dimension. To make such a statement as the one quoted would be like saying, "...but are describing purples of increasingly staggering size".
Third, if infinities can be "of increasingly staggering size" it would imply that they could also be of decreasing size. What, then, is the smallest infinity? Would it be essentially nothingness? Are we to now think that nothingness is infinite?
If this very basic thing can be missed, how can I take seriously anything else he says?
***** Really? I guess we first must define the word. Webster's online dictionary defines "infinite" as:
1: extending indefinitely : endless
2: immeasurably or inconceivably great or extensive : inexhaustible
3: subject to no limitation or external determination
4a : extending beyond, lying beyond, or being greater than any preassigned finite value however large
So to say, "infinite is a finite number" is simply ridiculous. That would be like saying yes is no, in is out, or war is peace. No matter how you put it, infinite and finite are opposites and one can not be the other.
Your example is doing exactly what I wrote can not be done...mixing a concept with a physical thing. The measurement of 33 cm is a physical thing based on the definition of a cm compared to something that is 33 times that definition, but when stated in inches it happens that we can not state it in an exact number (because the number goes on eternally) so we are left with expressing it in conceptual terms. What you are doing is comparing a measurement (a physical thing) to the expression of a measurement in a particular format (a conceptual thing) and acting as if they are one and the same.
***** No, but I would agree that the representation of Pi expressed in decimal numeric value happens to go on without repeating indefinitely...so far as we know, anyway. You could call that infinitely long. But you see, it's the expression that is infinite, not Pi itself. I will reinforce that the expression is a concept by asking back to you this question...How would Pi be expressed if we had a 12 base rather than 10 based number system? Our numbering system is a concept. Just like with the concept of color (I can't hand you "blue"...only something else, say a piece of paper, that we define as blue), a number is likewise a concept of how to represent something else (I can't hand you "2"...only something else that we define as having the quantity of 2).
Good try though.
TivertonAudio read up about about georg cantor, there is a gradation of infinities, infinities can be added and substracted from each other
TivertonAudio j
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 If you go half way from 1 to 2 and then half of that distance and continuing on in this manner, you can never get from 1 to 2; the distance between them is infinite. And yet, we know that the distance from 1 to 7 is greater than the distance from 1 to 2.
Does he know there is something called “psychopathy”? Yeah psychopaths are always in that pure state of mind, all the time. Perhaps emotions are prevent people to experience pure consciousness.
DISCLAIMER BEFORE YOU WATCH THIS @11:48 'mysterious process we shall not discuss today' - no wonder Einstien could not humor that one ;) One free miracle so that you get grant money?
The most basic thing that this universe is made up of has the property of flowing and sticking to one another. That property is the gravity. So, it is not a particle. It is a basic property. So, gravity is every where. That connects every thing to everything else. That is how space time is created. Space exists. That basic thing exists in the space. that basic thing,It is full of in the space.
Long ago, Irshies (those who had mind developed to the highest dimension) had travelled through worm holes, because the black hole and any where else is friendlier to them.
Consciousness:Super, Normal and Sub is experienced as the synthesis of Body(physiology) Mind(psychology and Spirit(energy) the process of universal consciousness as in Macro and Micro Mind. The oneness of it all is God or Source of any other construct of the law of unity. Are strings waves or particles and are they entangled? Conditioning is not being taught to think critically and 3Dly. Every dimension but ONE are all illusions, Thank You!
made it to 26:00.. I thought this was a science talk.. now he's confirming western mysticism?
You should check out ex NASA scientist Tom Campbell's video about the delayed choice quantum eraser experiment. Scientists found that it wasn''t the detectors collapsing the wave state but the human mind
Jazen Valencia I highly doubt any reputable scientist would regard a *causal link* between observing a phenomenon and it's collapse/occurence..
Sure maybe there is some interdependence/entanglement in the system.. but that's far from insinuating causality..
There's nothing special about the atoms in a human brain. Or to put it another way, all atoms are very special. They are all part of a massive information processing network we call the universe. It's consciousness all the way down.
quite a clever guy, we'll see how the math supports his views or doesn't
The wormhole can be traversed at the 'speed of thought'
At 9 minutes and 56 seconds into this he starts talking about the brain being quantum mechanical. Well that's where he starts with a false premise. Being able to perceive in the quantum perspective has zero to do with your brain. That is the equivalent of the tail wagging the dog.
Laura, that was a good point for him to make because a lot of scientists want to completely deny that there is anything quantum mechanical at all about the brain. They don't deny that the brain is made of the usual subatomic particles and thus contains quantum activity, but they contend that the "meaningful activities" of the brain (the activities that really drive the operation of our minds) are all classical for all intents and purposes.
It's this point of view that Penrose and Hammeroff take issue with - they believe that those microtubules are quantum in their operation and that they are plenty relevant to the important activities of the brain.
I think any of us who want to argue in favor of free will, self awareness, and so on definitely *do* need to establish a "quantum brain" - if the brain is entirely classical then it's hard to see how it can be anything other than a machine.
John Haeglin is the President of the United States of America most people do not know this fact
Now I see...
Consciousness is universal. but that's just about all he said that was true. I love a good theory, but string theory is not one of them.
soon spirituality would reconcile with physics
Shreyansh Singh can you help getting more das to prove that fact
yes....so many other disciplines are coming to the same point of confluence as well...not just spirituality and physics.
Pauli affect
A total mis-interpretation of the concepts to present a jumble of mis-understood nonsense.
阿無得好棒棒
or not
Please expand your answer, and provide evidence for your position. Thank you.
I sense anger!
who are you to spread your nuisance and talk of it as nonsense b the way.
31:40
woo woo
Hagelin is an award winning quantum physicist. What are your qualifications?
You need to double check that. He's not as qualified as you might think:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Hagelin#Kilby_award
Don't buy into everything Hagelin says.
However, he does refer to very interesting research like Roger Penrose's, "Orch-Or" hypothesis, which is unproven but interesting to think about: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orchestrated_objective_reduction
TooTroo you are gullible
Copernicus waited until his death bed to revive the idea that the Earth is orbiting the Sun (and not the other way around) because he was afraid his'woowoo' would leave him branded as a fool...
that does not make this guy right!!
traduction svp en français
Micro macro mecro
This is quackery
Is this person clever?
Salad?
@@seymoronion8371
Do you mean that he is coming out with word salad?
What do you mean Seymor?
Perhaps. I haven't watched the video yet.
@@seymoronion8371
Are you saying I'm fat Seymour? And that I need a salad?
Meat and tater tots are the only path to freedom