That’s not why she’s being sued… She’s being sued for fraud for trying to sell a property for way more than it’s appraised for… You people are slow… And they’re realistically probably going to win because this is the US and we take financial crimes very serious…
@@trinhhuyvinhbao670it's a land of liberal stupidity there, I immagine all the company has to do is either pay a bribe or tell the judge that she is a republican.
@@potatoheadpokemario1931 doesn't the construction company seem that scummy too? They apparently lied about land they owned and made the mess. The other company justed added fuel to the fire
There is nothing crazy about this. The company made a mistake and tried to resolve the issue with compensation. The person does not agree to any reasonable compensation. Company takes the case to court so that the law forces the person to settle the case with compensation determined by law. What exactly do you think should have happened here if this was so crazy to you?
@@Juhiss93 They should not have been total and utter idiots - they built house on a property they should not have. She has absolutely no liability to the company and does not have to agree to any payments as there was no contract between her and the company. I see two fair options: 1) The company provides here the house for free 2) They have it demolished at their cost A easily avoidable and dumb error on the companies part should not mean the land owner should have to fork up the money and pay them. The company should be 100%. responsible and take accountability for any consequences/repercussions as their error caused all of this.
@Juhiss93 if the owner reject the house, the developer/construction company(not sure who will be liable in this case) will have to restore the property back to its original state.
And once she can't pay the taxes anymore, the government takes it away and sells it at a discount to Black Rock/Vanguard. You'd think this robber baron stuff would've stayed in the history books, but here we are in a second gilded age.
I read about this case...it's absolutely bizarre how they screwed up and sued her because of their mistake. The company lost and has to pay for the demolition of the house on her property.
If she loses this case, her lawyer needs to get life in prison 😂 There’s no way this lawsuit holds in court. It’s either dismissed immediately, or we need to riot
@@CD-vb9fi your logic is not logicing. how is it her fault if you don't even know who she voted for. also, judges aren't always assigned by the government. get your brain running and stop victim blaming
@@Nezumi_Yasu Where did I say it was her fault? It's funny you say I should get my brain running. Try reading what I wrote again and see if you can figure out where you went wrong. But before you do, I suggest you follow your own advice first!
@@puggernaut6840 Last I have checked the company did not win. It's not over yet, but so far I believe the ruling has been in her favor. She is currently seeking injunction to ban the company from her property unless directed specifically by the court to do something and has asked for a 3rd party to perform demolition and restoration as the current company cannot be trusted for obvious reasons. I don't know if that has been granted yet.
Apparently they built on that lot because there was a power pole in front of it and that was what they were told was the landmarks they were supposed to use. They also sued the builder and basically everyone in the county tied to issuing permits. Ultimately, I think the land owner is going to get what she wants out of this, and should, but it exposed some really lazy/shady dealings
That makes sense cause to me it sounds like a tricky way to sell the home because apparently they are selling the house "cheaper" to Anne so that she buys it which is probably a trick to sell the house
Callimg some ungrateful after illegally building something they didn’t ask for is wild i hope this blows back an ppl stop using the construction company
The issue, is the company was told to build in a certain location by the sub dividers and had architectural plans for this lot. So there was multiple people who signed off on this. The builders are likely not at fault, its one of the other 2 entities.
Glad to hear she won the case. Imagine, someone coming to your house, building something in your backyard, then try to sue you for them trespassing and you not buying what they built.
Their argument is that she's ungrateful for all the value They added to her property but then also argue that she's not entitled to any of that value....
Unjust enrichment only matters in court if you are aware of the issue and decide not to notify the construction about it. She had no way of knowing, their fault for not checking
@@stalelemonproduction 100% true, but the company is betting on this happening after a few months: “ugh fine. You’ve completely drained my savings in litigation. I can’t afford my lawyers anymore. Let’s settle.”
It's as bad as a criminal who breaks into someone's home, gets hurt (or shot) & sues the homeowner. Or the squatter who sues to stay in a home that is not theirs. Everything is upside down anymore.
I guess because while a dumb case it'd be difficult to address what can & can't be brought to a judge. So it's up to the judge to decide if it's dumb enough to throw out.
You're telling em these idiots didn't even bother to check if this land belong to anyone before spending thousands of dollars building a house there? The audacity to try and sue when you made the mistake too. They deserve to lose the case and pay a kings bounty to this woman.
@@me2ontube I wouldn't fret it..i used to be a spelling nerd but phones these days override with auto wrong spelling and grammar to the point its not even worth it to care...im a stickler on my laptop but on a phone as long as the message carries 😏
Why sue the construction company. Is not the construction job to question the "owner" if he positively sure that he owns the land. Imagine the construction person demanding to see the house/land deed when he come to give an estimate.
@@nigellei8591 tf are you talking about, we are talking about construction TODAY, I can understand it if it happened in the past where technology is still limited but now???? We have professional surveyors using satellite/gps, digital theodolites, drones, advanced computers, like most of construction there's documents needed even the view in the sky and the coordinates, they probably did that to kick that woman out of that land. Sorry for my bad english.
Which actually happened to a woman who inherited her home, some squatters invaded it and trashed the place, and when she tried to get them out she got arrested..
@@lysanne201 After she tried to bypass the law despite being warned not to. The thing about the law is that it's up to the courts to decide who is in the right or wrong, not for someone to break the law out of convenience when they don't wanna bother.
@@moonamir9708No? Israelis literally own the land. They came back to find Arabs squatting in their land, and when they came to decolonize the land from the Muslim colonizers, they get called colonizers themselves, which is pretty fucking stupid considering Israelis own the land. It's like being driven out of your home, having someone else move in while you still own the deed to the house, and then when you return, you get treated as some kind of an intruder when you're the one who owns the house.
people shouldnt own lands. especially multiple lands this is why housing is expensive and homelessness everywhere 200m×200m of empty land just for 1 dude to look at it meanwhile people who cant afford it has to sleep on the pavemet
The homeowner deserves 100% quality of treatment, since it was not a mistake on her part, but the company. She should be compensated for inconvenience and damages experienced, while there shouldn't be any case to be filed. The developer admitted their mistake/error and has taken responsibility of building her house, on the same land, the company shouldn't be mad, since its an error on their part. Newer building materials that are collapsible or movable, hassle free as well. The weigh balances are 100% reconciled.*****important**** ,Thank you
So… what the fuck are they even suing her FOR? She owns a plot of land. They built a building on that plot of land. She doesn’t want to buy the building or trade that plot of land for a different empty one. She certainly holds zero responsibility for THEIR fuck-up. I hope their lawyer laughed in their faces when they brought this up.
The building belongs to her actually. She has no responsibility at all to any of the parties involved and this is why everyone is being sued. The construction company should be liable for using the wrong landmarks to denote their property.
@genericscout5408 no that's not true, the building and materials belong to the company still, the land is all that is hers, if they can put the property back to how it as before they are in their rights to remove all that
@@inverno6457 No it’s not. That doesn’t happen in the vast majority of cases. I know a couple who paid almost half a million in legal fees for their son when he was falsely accused of sexual assault. The judge ended up siding with the son (he had evidence that proved he was elsewhere at the time it supposedly happened), but only ordered the plaintiff to pay them $10k.
You're forgetting that she picked this particular parcel for it flora and fauna. When they cleared the land to build this unwanted house, they had destroyed ALL the plants she wanted to preserve. The contractor had "Counted the street lights and that's how he accidently build on the wrong land. The judge ruled that the house was to be destroyed and the contractor was to restore the lot to its original state. A very COSTLY mistake because the plants on that land were native and going extinct due to builders destroying the plants just to.build houses!!!❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤😇
If you want stupidity you could sue someone just because you don't like their eye color, the suit will get thrown out but it would still be a legal law suit. There was even a case were a man tried to sue God to show how easy you could sue anyone, only reason they suit didn't go through is because they couldn't fight God's home address.
This is why people think the rich have more money than sense. Rather than apologize and fix their mistakes, they're dragging the justice system into this for reasons
Not mistake at all, land in Hawaii is expensive and very profitable for building companies, so they build the house on purpose so they could kick her out.
That might be their intent, but logically and legally the house belongs to her for free now. She can also bill them the cost to demolish and remove it. However if the company can corrupt enough judges they might add a new law letting people steal property they don't own.
thats not what happens though. basically this plotland is not the only one in area, it's a whole really big empty area where the plot land is marked by like telephone pole or something. so yes, thats how they build house in wrong area. they dont build house there just to chase her out lmao
I hope she wins for a huge amount. It was on them. Instead of just owning up to their mistake, they try to make her pay for it. They deserve to lose big.
She didn't seem to want the house, so it might be more likely she'll order them to demolish the property and pay for damage to the land. Throw in trespassing and extortion charges for good measure.
@@mediokay508 That'd be fine too. In that case, they should be required to demolish the house, clean the area, and return it as close to before it was built as possible, all free of charge.
@@bananaman4613 She didn't want to sell the house. She just wanted to build her own house for horoscope reasons. Logically yes she should just sell the entire property for a mark up then buy new land. But hey the reason doesn't matter, she can keep the land then force the construction company to remove and demolish the house for free.
From other stuff I have seen, she bought it to preserve the land in Hawaii and already owns a house. Now the fauna and landscape is destroyed and she has to pay thousands extra in increased property tax
@@dizzy_jumpit's an "imagine" question. For this question to work you would have to watch the video otherwise it wouldn't make any sense. Use your brain
From other stuff I have seen, she bought it to preserve the land in Hawaii and already owns a house. Now the fauna and landscape is destroyed and she has to pay thousands extra in increased property tax
@@MegaMw3geek Hopefully those increased property taxes get added into what she is owed should she win since she didn't ask for the home to be built on her now ruined plot of land.
If " Being ungrateful" is ever an legal way of getting what you want. You can sue everyone, the Judge for being ungrateful for the case, the Lawyer and even the Prosecurer.
An old dude (somewhere in the US)who owns a lot of land decided to do something nice. He "gave" the land to his local university with the understanding that the university will keep the land intact after his passing. Not long after "receiving" the land, the Unni decided to evict the old man and sell the land to a property developer! Last time I checked on this story, the old man was trying to raise $500k for his defense!
@@curtisalex456 Honestly I think that's even more fucked up than this story, but both stories are examples of what the fuck. The one you're talking about is the equivalent of putting a relative in your will and then having them take you to court for not dying fast enough so they could inherit it sooner.
It turned this year that a separate company had to tear down the house and restore the property to its original condition, as much as is humanly possible. At cost of the agency that sued her! 😂😂😂😂
Yeah, that’s the grounds to sue her? She would be coming into ownership of a house they paid for because the construction company built in in the wrong place
Instead of getting a land survey to make sure of the correct plot to build on, the builder counted power poles. The lady won the court case. Steve Lahto, who does Lehto's Law here on UA-cam, did a cuple of stories on this case not that long ago if interested.
they need to give her the house for free and fully refund whoever bought the house, if she dont want the house, they need to remove it and restore the land to the state it was before they started building.
She should instead force them to demolish it and restore the land to its former state on top of paying her for whatever the increase is to her property taxes as a result of the homes value. That's the only genuine way to make the developer pay for their behavior.
In my country, if you don't use your inherited land but keep it, if ppl live there, you can't ask them out. So basically squatters law eats your inheritance. Bc many things can slow down your inheritance to begin with. This happens in Morocco btw. Feel free to bully officials that approved this law. Basically anyone can find a land that doesn't belong to the gouvernement, live in it for 20 years and he's granted the place. Usually it's fiels and nothing more sometimes it's with a house like my grandpa left us. It was taken over by ppl from that side of the country. There ain't dick we can do about it even if we have all the legal documents after years of fighting in court with original land ownership. But it had to be updated to fit modern standards. It took decades btw. Enough for the squatters to claim the land by rotten law.
It's the same here in Indonesia. But while it wasn't really legal, racism is so strong here it somehow happens. So suppose you're either (1) non-"native", or (2) non-Muslim, and you don't live in the land you have/build/inherited, those entitled "native" will live there. At that point, no one would help you due to the race and religion card. So the only way you can prevent this from happening is to pay someone (preferably the "natives") to live there. Yeah, it sounds ridiculous to pay people to live in your property. But you have to pay someone to guard the land, so to speak. This happens to me, as well as a lot of Westerners who owns a property in Bali (though Bali is a LOT less racist than any other places in Indonesia)
If you don't notice someone living on your land for 20 years, you are not exactly using it. There's a limited amount of land on the planet, and those laws exist because people forget they own land or because there sometimes is nobody who owns it anymore. 20 years is a long time.
Yes your honor, I would like to sue this lady for owning the property that I wanted to use without her permission and not take responsibility for my mistake. -Sounds legit.
Every bit of this is intimidation. If I were her I would tell them they could do tours of her house for a specific 4 hours a month in order to sell others like it.
i'd imagine them saying "your honor we build a house in her property and we are selling both house and land for a resonable price but she was ungrateful"
so the land is a really big undeveloped area that each area is only marked by telephone poles or something so thats how they mistaken the plot land. they should have do better job at marking the plot land now though
If I were her, I’d take the manager of the company who did that to court as well as the real estate agent who unlawfully sold it to them and make them make payments for demolishing and scrapping the home as well as restoring the plot of land how it originally was. I would then file a lawsuit against the person who sold the company that land, so he would never pull that stunt again. And charge court fees of course. After the house would be taken away and demolished, and everything as it originally was, minus the house, I would build the home with my money there. Although the business was being rude, I think the person who sold the land knowing it was someone else’s unused land trying to make more of a profit more than those rich real estate agents already are in Hawaii, then they should be taken to court and tried for crimes because what they did was illegal.
I hope this goes all the way. I hope she wins, collects damages and that the plaintiff has to pay all of her legal fees! This company will go out of business. Who will hire a company that messrs up this bad and then sues the victim?
That is criminal bull. I hope she wins and shuts down that entire company. The company is obviously crooked to the core and needs to not be in business anymore.
Getting sued for someone building a house on your land without your permission is wild
No way "being ungrateful" flies in court
No one knows why this reply has so many likes
Def flies if the judge is corrupt
@@KiyoBlackwellEnjoyer almost every judge is nowadays
That’s not why she’s being sued… She’s being sued for fraud for trying to sell a property for way more than it’s appraised for… You people are slow… And they’re realistically probably going to win because this is the US and we take financial crimes very serious…
I hope you are right, never know what the individual judge thinks
Suing someone after YOU messed up is crazy!
society™
Yeah what I'm reporting you bot 😅
Yea
@@locamiGIwhadddido
@@locamiGIbot? What do you mean?
She won her lawsuit and the developer has to tear down the house.
Yes!
Thanks for the update on the story.
what a waste of resources though. I hope Anne can still make her dream home
Thank you I was wondering if she won or not
Why tear down the house though?
Not only do I hope she wins the case, I also hope the construction company who supposedly told them it was their land wins the case too
Let's hope the judge has common sense in court
Why should the construction company win? Assuming they indeed told them that the land was theirs, that is fully their fault.
@@ladyjuno2456 because the real estate company is just that scummy
@@trinhhuyvinhbao670it's a land of liberal stupidity there, I immagine all the company has to do is either pay a bribe or tell the judge that she is a republican.
@@potatoheadpokemario1931 doesn't the construction company seem that scummy too? They apparently lied about land they owned and made the mess. The other company justed added fuel to the fire
Damn, suing someone for your mistake is crazy. I hope she wins the case.
nah she’s dumb. they gave her free money but she’s too stubborn to take it
There is nothing crazy about this. The company made a mistake and tried to resolve the issue with compensation. The person does not agree to any reasonable compensation. Company takes the case to court so that the law forces the person to settle the case with compensation determined by law. What exactly do you think should have happened here if this was so crazy to you?
Ann bought the land for 20k but legal fees bout to be 100k
@@Juhiss93 They should not have been total and utter idiots - they built house on a property they should not have. She has absolutely no liability to the company and does not have to agree to any payments as there was no contract between her and the company. I see two fair options:
1) The company provides here the house for free
2) They have it demolished at their cost
A easily avoidable and dumb error on the companies part should not mean the land owner should have to fork up the money and pay them. The company should be 100%. responsible and take accountability for any consequences/repercussions as their error caused all of this.
@Juhiss93 if the owner reject the house, the developer/construction company(not sure who will be liable in this case) will have to restore the property back to its original state.
Her property taxes also went up THOUSANDS versus hundreds after that house was built.
That's right I didn't even think of that her property taxes yeah wow I think she should get the house for a half a price or better yet cost!
@@Richard-ee4hvShe didn't want THAT house ! She had plans for HER house. That house needs to be removed, one way or another ! !
I’d take the house for free, which I think she is entirely entitled to.
@@Richard-ee4hvunless they can take the house away and pay her taxes they should just give it to her
And once she can't pay the taxes anymore, the government takes it away and sells it at a discount to Black Rock/Vanguard.
You'd think this robber baron stuff would've stayed in the history books, but here we are in a second gilded age.
I read about this case...it's absolutely bizarre how they screwed up and sued her because of their mistake.
The company lost and has to pay for the demolition of the house on her property.
thats it? no compensation for her?
If she loses this case, her lawyer needs to get life in prison 😂 There’s no way this lawsuit holds in court. It’s either dismissed immediately, or we need to riot
No... the citizens should be forced to compensate her from taxes. This stops when citizens stop voting in corrupt every chance they get.
@@CD-vb9fi your logic is not logicing. how is it her fault if you don't even know who she voted for. also, judges aren't always assigned by the government. get your brain running and stop victim blaming
@@Nezumi_Yasu Where did I say it was her fault? It's funny you say I should get my brain running. Try reading what I wrote again and see if you can figure out where you went wrong. But before you do, I suggest you follow your own advice first!
What did the lawyer do?? If anything the judge should get fired if they let the company win
@@puggernaut6840 Last I have checked the company did not win. It's not over yet, but so far I believe the ruling has been in her favor. She is currently seeking injunction to ban the company from her property unless directed specifically by the court to do something and has asked for a 3rd party to perform demolition and restoration as the current company cannot be trusted for obvious reasons. I don't know if that has been granted yet.
I'm sure It was no mistake, companies do this with complete intention because they can always play the bully card. I hope she can make it.
Apparently they built on that lot because there was a power pole in front of it and that was what they were told was the landmarks they were supposed to use. They also sued the builder and basically everyone in the county tied to issuing permits. Ultimately, I think the land owner is going to get what she wants out of this, and should, but it exposed some really lazy/shady dealings
I am a little bit concerned 😊
That makes sense cause to me it sounds like a tricky way to sell the home because apparently they are selling the house "cheaper" to Anne so that she buys it which is probably a trick to sell the house
They probably thought she would take the deal
@YuckFouTube2 They absolutely thought she would and now they're flabbergasted that she won't bow down and kiss their feet. I hope she bankrupts them.
Callimg some ungrateful after illegally building something they didn’t ask for is wild i hope this blows back an ppl stop using the construction company
Yes. Facts. No cap❤
@@locamiGI what is cap means? A hat? Capacity? I dont understand
@@bencekontra4035 like fake or falsehood(s)
@@bencekontra4035 cap just means "lie". it's slang.
for example "no cap" means "no lie", "you're capping" means you're lying.
@@bencekontra4035are you like 50 or something
Wow.. what a scummy company. Only a scumbag could sue someone after they made such a monumental mistake. Terrible
The issue, is the company was told to build in a certain location by the sub dividers and had architectural plans for this lot. So there was multiple people who signed off on this. The builders are likely not at fault, its one of the other 2 entities.
Glad to hear she won the case. Imagine, someone coming to your house, building something in your backyard, then try to sue you for them trespassing and you not buying what they built.
Their argument is that she's ungrateful for all the value They added to her property but then also argue that she's not entitled to any of that value....
She should be grateful that she got to bask in increased shareholder value for a few precious moments 😂
Unjust enrichment only matters in court if you are aware of the issue and decide not to notify the construction about it. She had no way of knowing, their fault for not checking
@@stalelemonproduction 100% true, but the company is betting on this happening after a few months: “ugh fine. You’ve completely drained my savings in litigation. I can’t afford my lawyers anymore. Let’s settle.”
How is someone entitled to open a lawsuit when they are trespassing?!?
Sounds like BS to me- they thought they’d get away with becoming her builder.
It's as bad as a criminal who breaks into someone's home, gets hurt (or shot) & sues the homeowner. Or the squatter who sues to stay in a home that is not theirs. Everything is upside down anymore.
I guess because while a dumb case it'd be difficult to address what can & can't be brought to a judge. So it's up to the judge to decide if it's dumb enough to throw out.
Oook
For trying to sell a property for more than its appraised for… You can’t value a property because “The stars align their”…
If someone trespasses on your property and drowns, that persons family can sue you if the pool wasn't behind a fence/gate access/secured.
You're telling em these idiots didn't even bother to check if this land belong to anyone before spending thousands of dollars building a house there? The audacity to try and sue when you made the mistake too. They deserve to lose the case and pay a kings bounty to this woman.
The construction company is at fault for that actually
This is why you pay the couple thousand dollars for a land survey...
She won and I think they are required to take the building down and pay her a bunch of money
@ph1shstyx the corrupt company tried to cut corners.
They for sure did that unpurpose.Hopefully those losers went to prison for that and hope she won millions of dollars from the counter sue.
On purpose
@@me2ontube I wouldn't fret it..i used to be a spelling nerd but phones these days override with auto wrong spelling and grammar to the point its not even worth it to care...im a stickler on my laptop but on a phone as long as the message carries 😏
@@strizhi6717 true
This is absurd. Sueing the construction company is probably the right choice but the lady getting sued is insane
Damn toxic gunner
Why sue the construction company. Is not the construction job to question the "owner" if he positively sure that he owns the land. Imagine the construction person demanding to see the house/land deed when he come to give an estimate.
These companies want to pressure everyone with law. We must support her.
Yooo what is toxic gunner doing here
@@nigellei8591 tf are you talking about, we are talking about construction TODAY, I can understand it if it happened in the past where technology is still limited but now???? We have professional surveyors using satellite/gps, digital theodolites, drones, advanced computers, like most of construction there's documents needed even the view in the sky and the coordinates, they probably did that to kick that woman out of that land. Sorry for my bad english.
This has the same energy as breaking into someone's house and calling the resident an intruder
Which actually happened to a woman who inherited her home, some squatters invaded it and trashed the place, and when she tried to get them out she got arrested..
@@lysanne201 After she tried to bypass the law despite being warned not to. The thing about the law is that it's up to the courts to decide who is in the right or wrong, not for someone to break the law out of convenience when they don't wanna bother.
As suing because the intruder fell down the stairs.
So basically Israelis.
@@moonamir9708No? Israelis literally own the land. They came back to find Arabs squatting in their land, and when they came to decolonize the land from the Muslim colonizers, they get called colonizers themselves, which is pretty fucking stupid considering Israelis own the land.
It's like being driven out of your home, having someone else move in while you still own the deed to the house, and then when you return, you get treated as some kind of an intruder when you're the one who owns the house.
Actually the judge is ordered to house to be destroyed. And the property to be returned to previous conditions. At the builders expense.
Stubs foot on table after not paying attention*
"DAMN YOU TABLE! THIS IS YOUR FAULT"
that's literally me when i was younger for some reason. i just took everything personally. much better now though.
Let her do what she wants with her own land 🤦♂️
people shouldnt own lands. especially multiple lands
this is why housing is expensive
and homelessness everywhere
200m×200m of empty land just for 1 dude to look at it
meanwhile people who cant afford it has to sleep on the pavemet
@@penyu1913 if people don't own the lands companies do which make the issue 10 times worse
@@penyu1913 Survival of the fittest
@@penyu1913the strong rule over the weak. Unless the weak become the strong.
That's OUR cruel world.
@@penyu1913 go back to Palestine
Dumbest crap ive seen today, you built it, you fix it
Facts slay girlqueen 🎉❤
@@locamiGI💀💀💀
Faxxxxx 💅💅💅💅💅✨️✨️✨️✨️✨️
Wot you mean fix it? The land is hers, so the house is hers. Period.
Mr popo, go back to kami's lookout
This is the definition of a frivolous lawsuit
If she doesn’t win in 5 seconds the justice system is broken.
That's insane. It's like telling someone "You should be grateful I didn't hit you." After stealing their money.
no it like hitting someone and then telling you to pay them for the mark they left on your face
The Will Smith treatment after getting his Oscar @@mgallogical7114
That’s America for you. Get sued for anything
The company deserves the most outrageous gaslighting award. How is she liable for their screw ups?
The homeowner deserves 100% quality of treatment, since it was not a mistake on her part, but the company. She should be compensated for inconvenience and damages experienced, while there shouldn't be any case to be filed. The developer admitted their mistake/error and has taken responsibility of building her house, on the same land, the company shouldn't be mad, since its an error on their part. Newer building materials that are collapsible or movable, hassle free as well. The weigh balances are 100% reconciled.*****important**** ,Thank you
Suing her: ❌
Suing the construction company that lied to them: ✅
So… what the fuck are they even suing her FOR?
She owns a plot of land. They built a building on that plot of land. She doesn’t want to buy the building or trade that plot of land for a different empty one.
She certainly holds zero responsibility for THEIR fuck-up.
I hope their lawyer laughed in their faces when they brought this up.
The building belongs to her actually. She has no responsibility at all to any of the parties involved and this is why everyone is being sued. The construction company should be liable for using the wrong landmarks to denote their property.
For the sake of naming everyone they can in the lawsuit. It doesn't mean they actually believe it's her fault.
@@mlmielke Lot of people that way. They don't realize that pisses judges and juries off
I think she can only have them demolish it.
@genericscout5408 no that's not true, the building and materials belong to the company still, the land is all that is hers, if they can put the property back to how it as before they are in their rights to remove all that
Dude she better win that lawsuit
Winning the lawsuit is not enough. The judge better ask the other side to paid for her legal bills.
@nigellei8591 that's usually what happens when you win a lawsuit 💀
@@inverno6457 No it’s not. That doesn’t happen in the vast majority of cases. I know a couple who paid almost half a million in legal fees for their son when he was falsely accused of sexual assault. The judge ended up siding with the son (he had evidence that proved he was elsewhere at the time it supposedly happened), but only ordered the plaintiff to pay them $10k.
@@inverno6457 not in the United States. In 99% of cases, litigants are responsible for their own legal fees, even if they win.
@@RabblesTheBinx What kinda system is that? Obviously the one at fault has to pay for the damages done + whatever was needed to determine this.
ACCOUNTABILITY HAS FLOOOOWN OUT THE ROOF. 🙄
You're forgetting that she picked this particular parcel for it flora and fauna.
When they cleared the land to build this unwanted house, they had destroyed ALL the plants she wanted to preserve.
The contractor had
"Counted the street lights and that's how he accidently build on the wrong land.
The judge ruled that the house was to be destroyed and the contractor was to restore the lot to its original state.
A very COSTLY mistake because the plants on that land were native and going extinct due to builders destroying the plants just to.build houses!!!❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤😇
The only thing the company added to Anne's land was more property taxes for her. 🤷
I get sueing the construction company, but sueing anne for "being ungrateful" is just such a Karen thing to do.
The company were the ones suing Anne BTW... just ridiculous.
I don’t see the company winning.
She wants the house demolished and they don’t want to. They ant her to go to another lot.
@@user-yj9gl3ur6c Literally "crapped on your doormat, toilet paper please"...
If you want stupidity you could sue someone just because you don't like their eye color, the suit will get thrown out but it would still be a legal law suit. There was even a case were a man tried to sue God to show how easy you could sue anyone, only reason they suit didn't go through is because they couldn't fight God's home address.
@@jaye4157 bro, that is so f***ing funny!
Saw an update on this yesterday. They are demolishing the home.
This is why people think the rich have more money than sense. Rather than apologize and fix their mistakes, they're dragging the justice system into this for reasons
Not mistake at all, land in Hawaii is expensive and very profitable for building companies, so they build the house on purpose so they could kick her out.
That might be their intent, but logically and legally the house belongs to her for free now. She can also bill them the cost to demolish and remove it. However if the company can corrupt enough judges they might add a new law letting people steal property they don't own.
thats not what happens though. basically this plotland is not the only one in area, it's a whole really big empty area where the plot land is marked by like telephone pole or something. so yes, thats how they build house in wrong area. they dont build house there just to chase her out lmao
@@genericscout5408That law basically already exists, it's called squatter laws.
@-_-Railgun-_- that's for a squatter in a home, but they have to be living in that home illegally for at least 10 years I think
@@-_-Railgun-_- The squatter only has due process to be evicted they don’t quite own it.
I hope she wins for a huge amount. It was on them. Instead of just owning up to their mistake, they try to make her pay for it. They deserve to lose big.
With that home increasing the land value, it raises her taxes as well and makes it harder for her to afford her dream home
This has already been ruled and completed. The house was torn down, no cost to the owner. All legal fees paid by the developer.
The audacity of the company to sue her after making a mistake themselves
They should be required to give her the monetary value of the house, ownership of the house, and an extra sum for all other damages.
She didn't seem to want the house, so it might be more likely she'll order them to demolish the property and pay for damage to the land. Throw in trespassing and extortion charges for good measure.
@@mediokay508she could get the house then immedialty sell it
@@mediokay508 That'd be fine too. In that case, they should be required to demolish the house, clean the area, and return it as close to before it was built as possible, all free of charge.
@@bananaman4613 She didn't want to sell the house. She just wanted to build her own house for horoscope reasons. Logically yes she should just sell the entire property for a mark up then buy new land. But hey the reason doesn't matter, she can keep the land then force the construction company to remove and demolish the house for free.
She already has the house because its in her land. The company just won't acknowledges it
I hope she wins her lawsuit because then that money could be used to demolish the home they built on her land and build her actual dream home.
"Accidentally built." Looks like you just got a free house.
From other stuff I have seen, she bought it to preserve the land in Hawaii and already owns a house. Now the fauna and landscape is destroyed and she has to pay thousands extra in increased property tax
Imagine waking up and learning that someone built a house on your lawn 💀
we watched the video
@@dizzy_jumpare u ok?
I am building a house on your land as we speak. SEE YOU IN COURT
@@dizzy_jumpit's an "imagine" question.
For this question to work you would have to watch the video otherwise it wouldn't make any sense.
Use your brain
@@pryt0n180 SO THEN WHAT'S EVEN THE POINT OF THE COMMENT IT JUST DESCRIBES WHAT HAPPENED IN THE VIDEO
Imagine suing someone for 'ungratefulness'. The court should sue them
I don't see how this would stand up in any courtroom 💀
Suing the construction company ✅
Suing the woman ❌
didn’t expect the company to sue
They are too dumb to figure out where to build a house, so they are clearly going to double down on their idiocy.
it's literally in the title you candlestick
@@dizzy_jumpalso did you know if a company builds on your lot legal they can not destroy the house or said building. And can not sue
@@dizzy_jumpCandlestick is wild 😭
🍆🥛🐺🐺🐺🐺🐺🐺🐺🐺🐺🐺🐺🐺🐺🐺🐺🐺🐺💪🏼💪🏼💪🏼🐺
The actual audacity to sue an innocent person after YOU fuck up is beyond ridiculous
Suing someone for being ungrateful is actually insane
"YOU come to MY land build YOUR house and you try to sue ME?"
"Because the star aligned here"
Is actually pretty good reason ngl
From other stuff I have seen, she bought it to preserve the land in Hawaii and already owns a house. Now the fauna and landscape is destroyed and she has to pay thousands extra in increased property tax
Whatever her reason she owns the land, plus she didn't even have to say why.
@@MegaMw3geek Hopefully those increased property taxes get added into what she is owed should she win since she didn't ask for the home to be built on her now ruined plot of land.
Its a better reason than they had to sue her
Imagine your argument on court is that "They were ungrateful" 😂😂😂
“The stars align” 💀 biggest bs I ever heard
Suing the construction company is fair, but why the lady ? YOU fucked up, not her
"Lets build on someone's property without permission and then sue them when they don't want our sloppy seconds!😃"
The builder needs to tear it down and sue whomever told them it was their property.
With our court system, it could go 50-50. Hope she wins a lot of money.
If " Being ungrateful" is ever an legal way of getting what you want. You can sue everyone, the Judge for being ungrateful for the case, the Lawyer and even the Prosecurer.
Being sued for "ungratefulness" is WILD 💀
An old dude (somewhere in the US)who owns a lot of land decided to do something nice. He "gave" the land to his local university with the understanding that the university will keep the land intact after his passing.
Not long after "receiving" the land, the Unni decided to evict the old man and sell the land to a property developer!
Last time I checked on this story, the old man was trying to raise $500k for his defense!
@@curtisalex456 Honestly I think that's even more fucked up than this story, but both stories are examples of what the fuck. The one you're talking about is the equivalent of putting a relative in your will and then having them take you to court for not dying fast enough so they could inherit it sooner.
The stars aligned indeed since she finna get that paycheck of the court
It turned this year that a separate company had to tear down the house and restore the property to its original condition, as much as is humanly possible. At cost of the agency that sued her! 😂😂😂😂
am i the only one who just realised how chiseled this guy's cheekbones are
Nope
ua-cam.com/users/shortsXvneZq741Rs?feature=shared
Nope. Noticed a while ago lol
Makeuppo
She is definitely in the right fuck that company
If i was the judge I'd make sure the lawyers who made this argument get sent back to law school....
their audacity is beyond audacity itself
Welcome to the screwed up justice system of America. 😂😂😂😂
This isn't in america..
@@locamiGIare you okay? Hawaii Is a state what do you mean, your comment Is making my brain hurt-
@@locamiGI"Goodbye California, hello America" ahh comment
@@locamiGIHawaii is my favourite Australian state
@@needstoastI thought it was a territory of Japan
These businesses are always trying to pass the buck, for their mistakes 😠
"Best defense is offence" is what this company thought after realizing that the land was stolen.
If the case doesn’t get dismissed immediately, I’d be surprised. They have no grounds to sue her. Thanks for the house.
Hah, quite literally no grounds! 😂😂😂
Yeah, that’s the grounds to sue her? She would be coming into ownership of a house they paid for because the construction company built in in the wrong place
"Hey i built on your property, im sueing"
Instead of getting a land survey to make sure of the correct plot to build on, the builder counted power poles. The lady won the court case. Steve Lahto, who does Lehto's Law here on UA-cam, did a cuple of stories on this case not that long ago if interested.
The builder of the house did not use a surveyor to be sure they had the correct property.
Audacity to sue someone after you do something wrong 😂
they need to give her the house for free and fully refund whoever bought the house, if she dont want the house, they need to remove it and restore the land to the state it was before they started building.
She should instead force them to demolish it and restore the land to its former state on top of paying her for whatever the increase is to her property taxes as a result of the homes value. That's the only genuine way to make the developer pay for their behavior.
That company's execs and their legal team ought to be jailed for this. What a disgrace.
She should be the one to sue, not the other way around. Wtf.
Anne is going to 100% win this case.
There's no way either company will win.
*Corporate lawyers and government connections have left the chat*
@@CTzons 👍
She won. The judge said the house could be destroyed.
Update, judge ordered house demolished and land returned to undeveloped state. Now noone is happy.
In my country, if you don't use your inherited land but keep it, if ppl live there, you can't ask them out. So basically squatters law eats your inheritance. Bc many things can slow down your inheritance to begin with. This happens in Morocco btw. Feel free to bully officials that approved this law. Basically anyone can find a land that doesn't belong to the gouvernement, live in it for 20 years and he's granted the place. Usually it's fiels and nothing more sometimes it's with a house like my grandpa left us. It was taken over by ppl from that side of the country. There ain't dick we can do about it even if we have all the legal documents after years of fighting in court with original land ownership. But it had to be updated to fit modern standards. It took decades btw. Enough for the squatters to claim the land by rotten law.
She didn't inherit this land, she bought it.
@@bradlemmondOk.
It's the same here in Indonesia. But while it wasn't really legal, racism is so strong here it somehow happens.
So suppose you're either (1) non-"native", or (2) non-Muslim, and you don't live in the land you have/build/inherited, those entitled "native" will live there. At that point, no one would help you due to the race and religion card. So the only way you can prevent this from happening is to pay someone (preferably the "natives") to live there. Yeah, it sounds ridiculous to pay people to live in your property. But you have to pay someone to guard the land, so to speak.
This happens to me, as well as a lot of Westerners who owns a property in Bali (though Bali is a LOT less racist than any other places in Indonesia)
If you don't notice someone living on your land for 20 years, you are not exactly using it. There's a limited amount of land on the planet, and those laws exist because people forget they own land or because there sometimes is nobody who owns it anymore. 20 years is a long time.
Yes your honor, I would like to sue this lady for owning the property that I wanted to use without her permission and not take responsibility for my mistake.
-Sounds legit.
I hope she wins the case-because telling someone they should be “grateful” for f**king up their land is WILD!
Court ordered the business to remove the house from the property and bring the land as close to its original state as possible.
That’s like robbing a bank and then suing them because they wanted all of the money back
The company suing her is hilarious 😂 like you people took her land and now when she doesn't agree to your offer you sue her 😂
Now, she gets a home for free. ☺️And paid because she sued. She keeps getting blessed.
Every bit of this is intimidation. If I were her I would tell them they could do tours of her house for a specific 4 hours a month in order to sell others like it.
What do they think they are doing?
If you will make a mistake, at least be in charge of it.
These are cowards!
i'd imagine them saying
"your honor we build a house in her property and we are selling both house and land for a resonable price but she was ungrateful"
That's a new way of stealing property and/or money from citizens.
How the f does someone build a house on a land that isn’t yours? I mean how brainded can you be?? 😂😂😂😂
how brainded
so the land is a really big undeveloped area that each area is only marked by telephone poles or something so thats how they mistaken the plot land. they should have do better job at marking the plot land now though
What ashame! Hope she wins her case as she should! Sick of these elite people!
this gets even more complex, as the house also got some Squatters now too.
If I were her, I’d take the manager of the company who did that to court as well as the real estate agent who unlawfully sold it to them and make them make payments for demolishing and scrapping the home as well as restoring the plot of land how it originally was. I would then file a lawsuit against the person who sold the company that land, so he would never pull that stunt again. And charge court fees of course.
After the house would be taken away and demolished, and everything as it originally was, minus the house, I would build the home with my money there.
Although the business was being rude, I think the person who sold the land knowing it was someone else’s unused land trying to make more of a profit more than those rich real estate agents already are in Hawaii, then they should be taken to court and tried for crimes because what they did was illegal.
I hope this goes all the way. I hope she wins, collects damages and that the plaintiff has to pay all of her legal fees! This company will go out of business. Who will hire a company that messrs up this bad and then sues the victim?
That’s absolutely ridiculous!
That is criminal bull. I hope she wins and shuts down that entire company. The company is obviously crooked to the core and needs to not be in business anymore.