Boeing 767 vs 787: Boeing wide body aircraft BATTLE!
Вставка
- Опубліковано 7 сер 2024
- This video is about the Boeing 767 vs 787. The 787 vs 767, two Boeing wide body aircraft. Boeing 787 was intended to replace Boeing 767 and was the future of Boeing wide body aircraft, with 787 being 20% more efficient than previous Boeing wide body aircraft like 767. But between these two Boeing wide body aircraft, the 767 vs 787, what’s the difference between Boeing 767 and 787? And how much more efficient is the Boeing 787 compared to Boeing 767, two Boeing wide body aircraft? Well, 767 vs 787, find out in this video!
LINK to COMMUNITY POST for Future COLLAB Videos!!! -> ua-cam.com/users/postUgxKnQSEl1Gn3njRV794AaABCQ
The Good Old 767 or the Revolutionary New 787? Which is YOUR pick? Do let me know! All footage credits to Airbus and Boeing!
i think they are both good looking, but I especially like the forward tilting landing gear on the 767
@@aarondynamics1311 Yeah the way it lands is pretty sweet and it looks good. Thanks for tuning in!
My most fav aircraft is 767, the fuselage,forward tilted gears,cockpit, etc. makes me loves them. But I don't hate 787, the wings and the nose of 787s are beautiful!
Yeah, they are all great looking aircraft;) Thanks for tuning in!
Love both of them. But my pick will go to the 767. The 767 seems to be a very interesting plane to me. I love the powerful performance of it and its good 2-3-2 seat config in economy
@@rak7673er what I find best about the 767 is it's cockpit. It is so easy to understand
@@mgsaviation9292 Yeah, that's true.
I personally liked the 2-3-2 layout
767👍
Yep, great for families and only one middle seat. Thanks for tuning in!
Middle seats are the worst...
The 767 deserves to have a 767x or 767-8 derivative with GENX-2B engines from the 747-8
I have heard that boeing is making the 767-x, it will have genx engines and will be based on 767-400 fuselage. It will be a freighter aircraft
@@mgsaviation9292 especially great news for the GENX-2B. It's great engine that's sadly at risk of failure due to the 747-8 being too niche for today's world
Apparently they are studying it as a freighter to replace current 767-300f... would be interesting :)
I love the 787’s aesthetic looking. It’s looking feels more aerodynamics, more spacious, it feels more efficient and it’s top notch long range aircraft with A350-900/1000 XWB. I don’t judge the 767, it’s just as well as the 787. In fact, it’s more capable of doing domestic flights and transalantic flights and cheaper to operate. But in my opinion about the Long Range version, 787 is a lot more capable of doing non-stop(s), 767 is for mid-range distance and domestic flights
True, both are perfect airplanes that fill their roles well, it would be interesting what Boeing does to replace the older smaller 767-200s, with a potential new program there! Thanks for tuning in
Tough decision... I love both of those beauties. But I have to go with the 767, sexy looking plane, simply powerful and it has a perfect 2-3-2 configuration. The 787 has a beautiful looking nose too.
Yeah, its such a hard choice isn't it :) both are great aircraft, 767 is hard to replace over shorter routes while 787 is great for long ones!
You need to provide the critical data as tables for easier understanding.
sounds good
Thanks for your support! Guess you were referring to the conclusion 🤣. Thanks for tuning jn!
There is one thing that the 767 does a lot better: Making money carrying cargo. 40 years after it’s introduction, it’s still being build brand new as it is better than any competitor doing medium haul cargo. Plastic doesn’t like to be cut, so they can’t fit a cargo-door in the 787, which means there is NO competition for the 767 really which makes it still the cargo-plane to go for! You will say A330-2F but that one exchanges fuel for cargo reasonably quick, which again results in lower profits. Apart from the 737, no plane has been built for 40+ years because it is so good!
The 787 family & 767 family are both identical in size and range. Both airlines are medium sized wide bodies which are not that big. Both are successful and I would enjoy flying with either
767 was successful and barely any of it crashed for the 787 its more efficient and more advanced though it had battery problems but thankfully it was fixed but the 767-400 did not had any problems but i love both aircrafts i cant choose which one u can choose for me
I call the 757 and 767 the unbeatable duo. Nothing will ever be as elegant as those 2. (well, an exception here is the queen of the skies 747) And, the 767 is seen on shorter transatlantic routes when you see the 787 on project sunrise.
True, the 787 really has more range and for 767 routes it might have too much range. Thanks for tuning in!
NM to Km conversion on the screen would go a long way
Yeah sorry forgot on this one :} oops... will include in future ones thanks for the reminder sorry
The B787 was originally designed to seat 8 abreast in economy and would have matched 1-1 with the B767-300ER and B767 400. However the overweight and other issues meant that the original promised was not met. Airlines then asked to squeeze 9 abreast seating to deliver even better economics, and Hence becoming the default configuration. But this has also made the B787 one size larger and it is no longer a true successor to the B767. It is also evident as we see airlines did not replace their B767-300ER with the B787-8 and the B777-200ER is being replaced by the B787-9 and the B787-10.
Yep, couldn't have said it better myself :) Boeing always seems to cramps more in, and now 17 inch seems to be the norm. Airbus has been talking about 10 abreast A350 as an option... Thanks for tuning in!
Why spend years developing an aircraft and doing research on passenger comfort, to come up with an aircraft that has 17’ seats in economy?
The video has too many breaks