Supreme Court overturns Chevron precedent, limiting federal regulatory power
Вставка
- Опубліковано 27 чер 2024
- The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 Thursday to overturn a 40-year-old decision that had given federal agencies broad regulatory power, curtailing the agencies' ability to enforce regulations. Former federal prosecutor Scott Fredericksen joined CBS News to discuss the decision and attorney and CBS News campaign reporter Katrina Kaufman has more on the cases still on the court's docket.
CBS News 24/7 is the premier anchored streaming news service from CBS News and Stations that is available free to everyone with access to the internet and is the destination for breaking news, live events, original reporting and storytelling, and programs from CBS News and Stations' top anchors and correspondents working locally, nationally and around the globe. It is available on more than 30 platforms across mobile, desktop and connected TVs for free, as well as CBSNews.com and Paramount+ and live in 91 countries.
Subscribe to the CBS News UA-cam channel: / cbsnews
Watch CBS News 24/7: cbsnews.com/live/
Download the CBS News app: cbsnews.com/mobile/
Follow CBS News on Instagram: / cbsnews
Like CBS News on Facebook: / cbsnews
Follow CBS News on X: / cbsnews
Subscribe to our newsletters: cbsnews.com/newsletters/
Try Paramount+ free: paramountplus.com/?ftag=PPM-0...
For video licensing inquiries, contact: licensing@veritone.com
This is the most important ruling in this cycle!! It's more bad news for the nation's 3 letter agencies...
It's bad news for all Americans. Corporations will have more power over every aspect of our lives.
Enjoy that unregulated food, water, and air
I hope you like your water lead flavored
@@RHCole
Drama queen mode activated.
Thank you, I will enjoy it!
Well, if people still want to vite based on entertainment and not functionality,America is about to pay a very steep price for its stupidity.
Your statement makes no sense.
@@zanzikar7 maybe you should think your critical thinking skills and see how everything correlates to each other, then you shall see my point.
Huh? Just means presidents and agencies acting on his behalf can't control the people without A SPECIFIC LAW stipulating so.
@mosesnabea4308 awwww, you mad?😂
@@nicholaslacey5861 Own the libs? The libs are living far better lives while you focus on your silly culture war. You can thank us later when we save you from yourself.
Better start holding those corporations accountable when making purchases like there's no tomorrow.
This wasn't about corporations. It was about government bureaucracies imposing unconstitutional law and regulations upon a free people. Everyone wants to blame the corporations and not the government for the problems in their lives.
@@zanzikar7how does that boot taste
I cannot scream it loud enough that 6 of the justices were picked by the John Birch Koch foundations and they will continue to usher in decisions supporting John Birch ideology. Removing regulations on businesses is one of their top 10 agenda items of the John birch movement that Charles Koch heads.
@@zanzikar7 no, it was about weakening our government and strengthening corporations
@@zanzikar7 I tend to blame the Americans who live in the bizarre, unhinged and malevolent world of right wing media.
He lied. It's not enforcing regulations, they are adding restrictions that were never intended by the original law. Key word LAW. If it isn't a LAW It's not enforceable.
Correct. No one is saying "don't protect the environment." The Court is saying, "if Congress wants to vest certain authority in the agencies, let them pass a law saying so. But under the current LAW, the Courts, not the agencies, have the final say." That's all. But yeah, his was a terrible, biased explanation.
@@gprang Congress is dysfunctional, and the volume of regulations that are set in various industries would never get through congress. There are constant changes to regulations based on science, from scientists in these agencies. Congress would be voting on changes every day to some regulation and nothing would ever get passed anyways, because you'll have democrats saying "micro plastics are bad and shouldn't be in our drinking water", and republicans saying "actually, micro plastics are good for you". This in essence will destroy the quality of our air and drinking water. Congress can't not and will not be able to keep up and limit chemicals from our drinking water and air, because even if they were in congress working hard instead of fighting, they wouldn't have enough time in the day, and certainly, are not scientists.
Laws are not specific for a reason, do you think congress knows what are safe levels of pollution or even how wifi works? That's why agencies and experts are necessary
@@danidan941Bro people are too dumb to understand this. This decision only helps powerful people who hate accountability.
@@ricardobarahona3939yea, this is a horrible decision. SCOTUS is f*cked
This is so wonderful, Bureaucracy had become the fourth and most powerful branch of government, Trump had been trying to rein in Bureaucracy and his Justice picks did the job for him. The idea the Bureaucrats can create laws and penalties by decree is unamerican, unconstitutional, an abuse of power. Now we need budget cuts that cuts down the size of Bureaucracy to reduce the deficit.
How about we get congress to actually do their job for more then 180 days a year chevron literally allowed them to just hand off their job to the executive branch and go home the rest of the year now that they need to pass laws they can’t just sit around half the year and go home the other half.
This is one of the best SCOTUS decisions of all time. It also follows the most basic premise of common law.
"An ambiguity in a contract benefits the party that did not draft it".
Very simple and the government drafted it, and the people did not. VERY VERY SIMPLE unless you are a statist id-10-t.
We’ll finally we have some common sense and the executive branch can’t just hand down any regulatory law it wants regulation cost Americans money now the White House can’t put onerous regulations on anything they want
Deconstruct the administrative state and replace it with a feeble dictator who won't read a one page document? What could possibly go wrong?
Criminal unelected tyrants in government big mad
...You're talking about the unelected tyrants appointed by a president who lost the popular vote by millions, right?
This gives more power to them.
Agencies used to be directly answer.Will too the executive branch environment congress and the voters.
Now they are answerable true unelected judges with lifetime appointments.
Unqualified, bought and paid for elected officials big happy.
@@jamesricker3997 How does taking away their way to make laws gives them more powers lol? Stop being a scheel for the left
@@jamesricker3997" now they are answerable true unelected judges"
As if before this decision, things weren't going through unelected bureaucrats? Fact of the matter is that the Constitution says the executive branch doesn't have the ability to make up regulations or laws, which is exactly what they were doing
I hope people go back to growing their own foods. The food chain already has compounds in the products that causes cancer. It will get worse after this ruling. No regulations or minimal regulations means anything goes as long it is profitable.
Yeah now the feds can't poison us with what's good for us...
It doesn’t mean no regulations. It means they have to be passed by Congress, not made up by unelected bureaucrats.
About 39 years to late
To prevent any branch of government becoming too powerful, powers were separated: Congress writes laws, the Executive branch approves them, and the Supreme Court interprets laws. In 1984 the Supreme Court (with three Justices absent) wrote a decision known as the "Chevron decision", which combined all powers under the Executive branch. The President and his staff now had authority to write laws and interpret them, without the other branches of government. Today's Supreme Court decision weakens the Chevron decision, which helps to restore the separation of powers.
A cursory and vapid understanding doesn't hide the malice. These 6 justices are on the court because they will do the bidding of the polluters. PERIOD. You can conjure all the erudite semantics you want, this is about deconstructing the administrative state and replacing it with a feeble dictator. I DARE YOU to watch Sheldon Whitehouse and "The Scheme." Then come back here and tell us how Leonard Leo is doing you and your family a solid.
Great job SCOTUS on Chevron, it's long overdue.
They must be mad.
Well I'm all for regulations against widespread pollution for profit and corporate monopolies. However I don't think that the fisherman should have been obligated to pay the salaries of those who boarded their fishing vessels to monitor them. That's what who brought this case
Superfund sites here we go!
Hell yea finally
Very Good... They have to.. You can't let the CDC regulate itself. That's not regulation. If you let me regulate my Business, There would be no regulations on my business.😂 I get it though wait to try to frame it as a bad thing.😮
When a chemical company dumps waste in your water system, you can call Trump to come deal with it.
@@12ofamericacantreada6thgra6 It doesn't really sound like you get this. Now instead of an agency passing a rule, the rules just have to be voted on.
EPA, OHSA, FDA gonna have to come up with serious rules
Rules within the law, they can’t be making their own wild interpretations and think no one can question them.
STEP 1 .. DEFUND ATF
“We the corporations of the United States of America.”
@@Cloudguy5673None of those things are even happening today. You're just being a troll spewing nonsense l.
@@MikeJones__Who He's not being a troll, he literally believes this because this is what fox is convincing their viewers of. But it's narrow minded. Go talk to people who have been poisoned by contaminated drinking water and tell them there should be no regulation on it. It's the inability to put themselves into other peoples shoes, because they don't get out of their bubble and travel, and talk to people who may not agree with them.
Well done 😮
You should use your mind more.
So what was the Oregon Homeless case decision? Don't mention that the decision is in without telling us what it is. Right?
Watching progressive cry harder because their bureaucratic institutions are crumbling around them. I love it. These people claim to be rebels and dissidents but they support the bureaucrats.😂😂
can you say the name of the cases please
The case they're talking about here, which overturned Chevron is
Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo and Relentless, Inc. v. Department of Commerce
www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-451_7m58.pdf
@@DarkMatterX1 thanks i found it, just would have been easier if they just said the name
Well would ya look at that ! No more unelected bureaucrats use Ming law-fare agains the citizens. No more dictating and making laws they never had authority to do per constitution to begin with. Congress makes law not some unelected power tripping bureaucrat . Even congress can’t make laws that would supersede or other wise take a right away so ceveron deference did exactly that. No more of alphabet soup group unelected authority .
P.S. Adding to my comment below, I think international regulatory agencies that accept USA approvals should also get involved. The more the better. They want charlie fox? They'll get charlie fox.
Coincidence?? In an election year? The leading candidate is who? I quote. 'We are transferring power from Washington DC and giving it back to you.' THE PEOPLE! 🍿
The EPA lol ask Michigan how they like the EPA? OR Huntsville alabama where the water is toxic from military waste.
Or the Bundys and desert turtles and sage.
This could save the USA. Down with the corporation
Wickard v Filburn must be overturned next.
Good job scotus
Just get rid of the EPA and ATF
Yes Silkcitysocialist420 we are done.
Corruption
Democrats are gonna be furious
GREAT NEWS
Money is not expertise. This is insane. Regulations are a good thing. Informed authority is a good thing.
Every safety check that you cry about, kept your food edible, your air breathable, your water drinkable, and your home standing.
SCOTUS has cemented us into an idiocracy
The same people voting Trump and thus his justices in, will be the first to complain when their drinking water is poisoned. Voting has consequences.
SCOTUS says we live in a Republic under the rule of law.
It sounds like you've replaced your parents with a gigantic administrative state full of self-interested of bureaucrats.
It's a bold move, Cotton.
A perfect example of a man who trusts the government too much. I sure wish I had the lack of dignity that allowed me to rely on groups of people to regulate my life.
Unfortunately for some, Americans just gained a larger piece of freedom with this ruling.
@@masterofnow1freedom for what? Why would you want the freedom for your food to not be strictly regulated?? I do not understand this thinking process at all. Would that not just lead to less regulated food which can make people sick because corporations are generally greedy enough to find loopholes in laws like we see time and time again? Doesn’t this just make that easier? It seems like a pointless freedoms to have!
Who needs subject matter experts when you have partisan judge to rule what’s best for us.
Subject matter experts? Like the directir of BATFE's firearms technology department who couldn't field strip a glock 19? A pistol that takes less than 5 seconds to strip?
All this does is return the authority to legislature back to the legislature and the legislature alone. Are you actually shilling for the administrative state?
@@ytmndan I do. Who wants a bribed politician determining what is a safe level of lead, nitrogen or solid particulars in my drinking water. Flint Mi. is an example on how republicans believe in personal responsibility and holding authority accountable; all charges dismissed. I guess, I can start burning my trash including plastics in my backyard; and you can sue me if you have the resources and can prove damages.
They believe themselves our Gods.
@@GeneElder.R27
Instead, you worship "experts."
Getting rid of all the alphabet rogue Fed. outfits is a step in the right direction...Praise the Lord....
Ha!!! The fliood gates of lawsuites are opening.
2 step in courts is done 😂
A super majority should not be allowed on the Supreme Court or stuff like this happens! Biden needs to appoint another Justice, since Obama w never did, before he leave office!
Today was a good day.
This is fantastic.
Alito's corruption has exceeded that of Thomas! Thomas's interest lies in his wife's income from her leased land. The explanation is lengthy but is outlined in snippets as follows: "The wife of Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito leased a plot of land to an oil and natural gas company while the judge was weakening the powers of the Environmental Protection Agency, report says". "In June 2022, Justice Samuel Alito's wife leased a plot of land in Oklahoma to an oil and gas company.
Alito's wife stands to earn 3/16ths of the money generated from the land should extraction prove successful.
Alito in several rulings before the court has been part of majority decisions to reduce the scope of the EPA." "But the oil and gas lease troubles many environmentalists given Justice Alito's role in weakening the scope of the Environmental Protection Agency in several cases that have come before the court."
This is kinda terrifying. I was a sickly kid in the 90's. I cant go back to that because corporations want to be cheap and greedy and destroy the environment.
Stop being weak... Strengthen yourself, mommy government isn't there for you..
@@CollinKillian
???????
@@Saehilder Ha ha, you say ignorance shows up, yes you did!
@@politicman1 can you come up with a better response?
Considering the way the debate went. No surprise with the sleuth of supreme court hip fire decisions on a dime! Better get those last minute Chevron rulings in!
0:09 "Homelessless" Amazing job.
All the freshly created pages just to comment in favor of a overbearing gov is crazy
Entrapment
This doesn’t mean regulatory laws can’t be passed, it just means they can’t be passed by unelected bureaucrats
✊🏾
No it literally means the agency can’t really enforce it lmfao do you understand English?
I think you mispelled.
Laws can't be made by experts in the field. But instead by politicians that's are bought and paid for by the corporations they are writing laws for.
@@alexaecho4273 it means the agencies can only enforce laws passed by Congress, comprende?
@@startingQB Nah, laws can’t be made by unelected bureaucrats. Only after they go through proper judicial review can they be made and enforced.
I am 83 years old. I grew up on the shores of L.I. Sound in Connecticut. When Richard Nixon founded the EPA, the clean up of our air, and water, began. In my youth when you looked out over the Sound, there was a green haze. We were told that it was the edge of the world and if you entered the haze you would fall off the earth. While some of the pollution was generated in the area. A large portion of it was carried in by the prevailing winds from the west. Legislation was enacted that curbed that inflow, and today on most days you can gaze across the Sound and see the white sandy beaches and larger buildings with the naked eye.
We continue to have bad days when the air is hazardous and not healthy for a great many people, but not on the scale it was.
On an August night when Donald Trump was running for office in 2016, he held a rally at Fairfield University. At that rally he told the crowd that he would bring "Clean Coal" back. It was a hot muggy evening and their was a tri-state alert that the air was hazardous for all groups. The crowd roared their approval. Several collapsed and had to be taken to hospital.
And now, because of this decision, the haze will come back. I’m scared for my future at 19. It’s sad many see this as a positive when it will only destroy our future.
@@dylanv3220Fellow 19 year old here, we don’t have a future.
@@johner3364 I'm afraid you are both right. There are warming trends that are not even mentioned, or kept quiet, because of fears of creating panic. Have you even seen any information about the thawing of the permafrost???
@@dylanv3220dont fall for the fearmongering
Meanwhile the Republicans are losing elections because they have lost interest in governing. If they can't sufficiently break our democracy to stay in power, they will take the entire nation down with them................................ if we let them. It is W I L D to see the "intellectual class" on the right here, trying their best to justify the decisions of this captured supreme court. It's like a guy touting the strength of the Titanic's steel when he's 38 seconds from a dip into the icy water of the Atlantic.
Maga will doom the GOP much faster than Paul Ryan and his peculating partners ever could. THAT is a good thing.
Ah yes, we know more than doctors because we're not trained in that, so let's make the rules instead of doctors. /s
Doctors don't make laws. Congress does.
The clock is running backwards folks...😢
GOOD
Hallelujah
@Cloudguy5673 "the people" can't even figure out if the world is a sphere or if it's flat. What a disaster and a joke of a comment
@@Cloudguy5673 One's rights to freedom infringes on another's right to freedom. Freedom is not absolute, or you would have anarchy. My right to know what is in the food I'm eating is infringed upon when the companies producing that food can put anything they want in it. My right to clean drinking water is infringed upon by the company down the street dumping toxic waste into the nearby streams. It's not as simple as "freedom". Freedom for who?
@@Cloudguy5673 Led bulbs are approximately $3 and incandescent bulbs are about $1. You'll spend about $1 of electricity operating the incandescent bulb for a month. LED bulbs pay for themselves very quickly but since you're a low information voter, you don't know this.
Great, I'm glad the FAA is now rendered useless. Frankly, Boeing had too much oversight already. Aviation safety just increases the cost of travel.
Please tell me this is satire
@@RHCole Absolutely, it's an insane move by SCOTUS. Although I'm tempted to go blow right through Class B airspace without a clearance, and when ATC gives me a number to call, I will tell them my name is John Roberts.
No it's a great decision actually l. Congress should make the laws, not the agencies.
@@afrofrycook100% CORRECT!!!
Yeah! Cause the FAA was obviously already doing its job~ Congress makes Laws, not unelected officials that are NOT accountable to the people! Case in point...Multi-billion dollar agency with ONE JOB! And private companies equipment under their watch are falling apart in the sky...🤔 I'd say there's a problem with the current government structure and spending! Quite obvious actually~
Don't fly
Glad for this decision
These judges are doing the devil's work turning everything on its head that's been law
How? You want UNELECTED officials, making stuff up? This is a good thing, it puts the heat on officials who make laws to do their jobs.
Bureaucrats don’t make laws, congress does.
Well, but you still want to vote for an entertainer vs who will fight for you?
@@mosesnabea4308 what are you talking about? Lol who am I voting for since you know so well ? Smh cnt even make a statement without someone thinking you for one guy or the other 🤦🏾♂️
The devil has been in charge since before Chevron... CHEVRON was the devil. You all are the bad guys in this case.
Boeing is getting off scot-free now!!
Our country is so done!
What? This is a good thing. We dont want the federal government to have unchecked power. Our county is returning to the people!
@@TheDude_Abides_Great. Then "the people" can inspect their own food, as opposed to the FDA and USDA.
@@mrmojorisin6951 It doesnt stop that, it STOPS the 3 letter agencies from HURTING Americans by changing definitions and creating their own laws. This is good, AMERICA is coming back.
@@mrmojorisin6951 Plus, that would be great anyway, humans can inspect their own food and the USDA is just a big government lobby to keep small growers OUT of the market.
@@mrmojorisin6951 If you don't routinely wear a full chemical warfare kit including a gas mask you have only yourself to blame. Apparently.
Foreign mail order brides public use of tax payers cous police vehicles missing taxes children at private school s etc..
As with most SCOTUS rulings, we won't really see the full effect of this for at least several years. In general, I'm all for less government power, but these regulatory agencies have to have some kind of lawful basis under which to operate.
Now corporations will run the country
False, we will see the impact of Cheveron being overturned immediately. Example: Pregnant Workers Fairness Act and inclusion of abortion in list of services.
They _do_ have a lawful basis. That is the explicit powers enumerated to them under legislation duly passed by the congress, and signed into law by the executive.
This is a good ruling.
SCOTUS Robets-- Bdagavad Gita 'Now I become Death Destroyer of Worlds.'💣
Wha a disaster this clown court has been for this country.
We're all going to be drinking polluted water breathing in toxic smog, ride in vehicles with no safety regulations. What an absolute joke.
@@Cloudguy5673 seek help
@@Cloudguy5673 seek mental help
@@Cloudguy5673 The more you talk, the more you validate my point.
I encourage you to seek mental counseling immediately.
@Cloudguy5673 You keep throwing around insults but you can't even spell.
Not only do you need to seek mental counseling you need to seek hooked on phonics too
@Cloudguy5673 You must have a lot of money to hire a team of lawyers every time a corporation poisons you. Hope that works out for you.
The EPA has definitely overstepped. This is a good thing. Limited government is always a good thing.
Not when it involves something in place because of corporations doing things like selling LITERAL radioactive material as energy drinks such as back in the 30s... and let's not forget about the smog and acid rain issues in the 80s and 90s. If you think removing the ability to regulate is a good thing then its because you are greedy, not because you're protecting people.
@@KuariThunderclawThey still have the ability to regulate. They simply only have the ability to regulate within the bounds of the LAW.
@ytmndan the law is never defined in a granular manner...implied powers are necessary just to keep things somewhat running.
Congress is just a huge brick that can't even fund itself. This is a disaster of a ruling that people can't even comprehend. We will all sorely regret this
@@MikeJones__Who The legislature exists to write the laws. The executive branch exists to execute those laws AS WRITTEN. The executive branch was never intended to write its own laws. If a law needs to be changed, it needs to be done through the proper legislative process, not by executive fiat.
@ytmndan That's not really true. The concept of implied powers for the executive branch is written through out the constitution and case law. So the idea the executive can only execute laws "as written" isn't accurate.
Dis Band the A T F
Great News!!
Good!!!! Good!!!! Goood!!!!
Affluent fraternal order of police hotel sex parties who not police Union
supremely corrupt kangaroo court! these are tingles words do not steal them!
atf suck it
Constraining the power of the Executive Branch seems like a good idea in light of a possible trump Presidency.
It's unbelievable how you relate all this to one man.
Based
Because judges are also experts in science, engineering, environment, human biology, etc., etc.
Good luck with that
This is the most ignorant take in these commnets.😂😂😂
@@masterofnow1
No stare decisis. Why only nine justices at this point? Time to add to the court.
The Supreme Court is only subject to horizontal stare decisis and it’s completely appropriate for them to overrule precedent if a case was wrongly decided. Stare decisis doesn’t mean that court opinions are immutable.
Congress can pass additional laws if needed. Unelected agency staff shouldn't be the party responsible for the majority of the laws citizens have to comply with daily.
Ever seen what the city looked like in Blade Runner ? ...If you live long enough ...that's probably what you'll see .. as you see now, but thousand's of mile's after mile of it - ... ... You'll then get to go into little movie theater's just to watch video scene's of how it used to be/ nature etc (Sure they'll still have genetically modified popcorn and tasty imitation butter .. so no worries' 😀 😳) ... ... ...
Kind of like when the old boy lay down to die in soylent green also ... ... ... : Hope I get to miss that whole scene ! 😕
♎⚖️
Remember, ...their kid's and grandkid's .. will be in the same boat forvwhat they do today ! 🙂🤍
Well, .. just as well I guess .. the federal regulatory sector was as useless as it get's for year'$ anyway ...right ! 😐
i remember the smog over dallas it suck it now clean
These justices are dumb as hell. We will now need a specific law/statute for everything… no worries because congress is good at passing laws?? This is going to be a complete sh*t show
This is what republicans can't comprehend. Congress turned this power over to the agencies because the scientists are the experts, and congress could never keep up. Just look at the mess of hearings around covid. Now we want them to pass several laws every day to regulate industry? Toxic dumping is now legal, just find the nearest stream and dump away!
What kind of kool-aid do you drink?
@@squarebusinessofficial so nothing for a reply to what was stated. There will be increase of litigation now which as it turns out if we thought that government moved to slowly we just became the preverbal turtle.
@@Saehilder it means agencies cannot interpret what the laws mean due to each agencies expansive views. They cannot take ambiguous laws and make their own determination of what it means. What part of separations of powers don't you understand? Let congress do their job and hold them accountable.
@@squarebusinessofficial holy crap i know what it means, IT DOES NOT change the fact that now unless its WW3 nothing will get done. And you say hold congress accountable, lobbyists are laughing right now.
Project 2025 domino?
Should we brand this crazy Supreme Court as MAGA court?
Everybody needs to say thank you to Donald Trump Trump's the one that got us to supreme Court that overturned this b******* decision thank God for Donald John Trump
Thank the Lord!
No, thank corporations.
@@Rustea314 maybe You don't understand the Constitution and how Our Laws are meant to be enacted? However, no administrative agency with appointed officials, not elected officials, should be creating any Laws, period. That is like letting the ATF write gun Laws! And they're currently desperately trying~ Now, you wanna remove corporate influence? Then remove Lobbyists from Washington!
@@evanrussell64 If congress has the authority, It can transfer it's authority to another. The Declaration of war is given to military by congress and this is unlawful because?
Congress can not transferred it's authority to another agency such as USMC. Thanks.
@@Cloudguy5673 No, you can not sue a stockholder.
A corporation is designed to protect and conceal the owners from the consequences. Did anyone go to jail at FOX for promoting fraud? The CEO of Boeing was given 40 million to walk away and keep his mouth shut after the second crash. The CEO, and CFO have learned their lesson and maximize profits and grab the golden parachute.
@Cloudguy5673 In America, you can sue anyone for anything, a right to redress of grievances; however, this does not guarantee anything other than hearing. State an explample where an officer of a corporation was convicted and imprisoned? please. I know of one, but that was for purgery, not for persons that died.
Im super excited for less regulation, remember how well that went with railroads in ohio a couple years ago? Absolutely 1000 IQ decision. As we all know, corporations have our best interests at heart
These “conservative” courts are going to take us back to the days of smog, rivers running with oil and sludge, and lots of other horrible things. So much for making America “great”.
I remember when Obama’s EPA officials turned a river in Colorado orange by releasing slug pond contaminates from a mining operation. They got promoted
My experience of judges is that they don't know the law, so letting a judge decide on complicated law with total immunity and no guidance by legal regulators is basically an elimination of regulation. Americans are not safe in this tyranny. We won't have a Federal government in the next couple of years. Are the people evolved and protected enough in other ways to thrive (let alone survive) in this environment? I don't know, but I think many will pass on to the afterlife in these circumstances and they typically are the conservatives who aid the top 1% through their ideology in this recent Supreme Court decision.
Overturning precedent? Where did these judges go to school? Apparently at Trump University
Huge victory for Freedom. Now what ever law they want to control us with, has to be voted on by the people or people they elected.
Yes, the freedom to eat carcinogenic food, breathe poisonous air, drink toxic water.
You eat first. If you don’t get sick, then I’ll try it.
Good, now it's time to make some cuts with regards to the amount of people that work for those agencies
This is excellent! Now those bureaucratic agencies who unlawfully persecuted countless free citizens should have their entire budgets stripped from them, they don't need it anymore, and awarded divided amongst their victims.
Corporations are people too. People that can't be held accountable.
@@Rustea314 So you believe that without unlawful bureaucratic rule, no laws exist? Corporations are people too, and they're accountable under the same standards as everyone else. They're called laws. Don't like the laws? Pass new ones. You don't get to just erect an unelected, unaccountable, totalitarian bureaucracy to "hold people accountable" for things that you weren't willing or able to pass a law to "hold them accountable" under. This was one of the single greatest injustices in American history, and SCOTUS absolutely did the right thing to overturn it. Our government is not allowed to "hold people accountable" for anything unless the House, the Senate, and the President, i.e our elected and accountable representatives, pass a law. That's literally the whole point of the Constitution.
This is just dumb. Do congress knows environmental science (in the expert level)? No. All they know is nonsense politics. If the EPA is involved heavily when drafting an environmental law, there will be minimal-to-no ambiguity in the first place. The problem is congress can draft laws with essentially no consultation to the experts in the discipline where the laws will be effective.
They actually had to learn all this before chevron because they had to make a law and pass it after chevron they didn’t have to learn anything because the executive branch could enact policy without them needed to make a new law.
The only time I have ever heard Trump tell the total truth. These truly are HIS judges.
The BIGGEST one will be the ATF. This is GREAT news for Americans.
Twisted logic.
Ignorance
@@davidguelette7036you love your overbearing gov huh
@2Alandis Remember undrinkable water ,rivers on fire,PFAS,and forced evacuation from superfund sites?Do you trust corporate oversight to use this ruling responsibly?
@@davidguelette7036
Then Congress better get to work, eh?
FULL IMMUNITY
All to make Trump a KING. Vote blue kids.
Too many freaking regulations!!
Every regulation has been paid for in blood.
Thank God this was overturned, we've been subjected to rogue federal agencies for far too long far too many of them also while we're talking about it. Looking forward to having all my suppressor tax stamp money refunded back to me. I hope this costs the federal government billions
Great news!!!!!!
The constitution is very clear on who can make law,and that’s only congress,very good thing to reign in unelected bureaucrats. 👍
Correct! Have these people never read Kafka?
Congress is completely disfunctional and hasn't done anything significant in a long time.
You mean reign in by experts in the field. And place it in the hands of politicians bought and paid for by the corporations they are writing laws for.
Except Congress made law establishing these agencies and giving them power... so sorry, but pretending Congress isn't involved with them is a flat out lie.
@@KuariThunderclaw umm congress can not circumvent the constitution,nowhere in the constitution does it give congress the ability to say other agencies can write law.
More spin from the guest. this is not a liberal vs. conservative question, this is a legistlation question, if you want to make a law, pass the law, don't try to squirm your way around the law by reading things into it that aren't there.
Like religious people do?
"Reading things into it that aren't there?" or utilizing those powers in ways you don't like? Sorry buddy, but these organizations exist BECAUSE of legislation that gave them broad powers because of corporations flat out killing people. This isn't a legislative question, the legislation already passed.
@@KuariThunderclaw
That congress cannot either delegate, nor can any other entity assume their responsibility to legislate to is an indisputable fact.
Either the law is deliberate, and specifically enumerates the powers if these agencies, or they have no power at all.
Don't like it? Call a convention. I dare you.
E: typo _specifucally > specifically_
@@DarkMatterX1 They can't delegate their specific powers to other branches such as they can't give the President power to make laws. There was no delegation of their power. They established specific agencies with broad powers using their legislative authority.
Sorry buddy, but you don't get to have it every which way, especially when none of the routes are remotely honest.
@@KuariThunderclaw
Are you joking? This argument doesn't hold up to even the most modest scrutiny. Every single regulatory agency is the executive branch. Making "rules" is legislating. Legislation may nor be done by the executive branch. They either have specific, explicitly enumerated powers, or they have _no power at all._
It's about time the EPA was defanged
I see Fascism and The Devil are near. Jesus will arrive on a pale horse and rid us all. We're wrong. ☮️
The Jan 6th obstruction ruling DOES NOT mean hundreds of Jan 6 convictions will be overturned. It involves a specific situation that doesn't apply to most of them.
It also doesn't mean Trumps case will go away. He will still face trial after he loses the election OR after his 2nd term if he manages to somehow win.
After last night...don't see how he loses.
@spankyssurprise1361 Then you haven't thought about it enough. Everyone's minds are pretty much made up and were prior to last night. Trump didn't gain any voters, and everyone already knew Biden is old and has slowed. That should tell something to the GOP: their candidate is SO bad, so terrible in every way, that 12 million more people are willing to vote for Joe Biden over him
Trump didn't perform well at all last night either. The only reason he appeared competent last night is because Biden appeared so poorly.
Additionally, there will be other debates, and Biden has been seen very recently looking MUCH better than he did last night.
The only voters who were watching to try to make up their mind are low info voters who haven't paid attention. There is more information and appearances available for voters to decide their vote now than there ever has been. Anyone who somehow didn't see any of it watched last night and likely still hasn't decided. The next debate will make their mind up.
The attempted overthrow of the 2020 election, women getting sepsis and mandating religious laws in public schools - Republicans are going to lose.
Vote Blue & Expand the Supreme Court
Imagine shilling for the administrative state.
Stupid idea, expanding the court , that is.
What’s to stop the other party from expanding the court even further in the opposite direction when they come into power?
Think!
Taking power away from the seat moisteners and giving it back to the courts was the correct thing to do. Federal regulatory employees had WAY too much power. Now the people whose lives these regulations often affect, to their detriment, can use the court system as intended. Taking power away from government is a very, very, GOOD thing!!!
"People" lol, you mean million dollar corporations.
Except regulation protected the average person generally and only made corporations less able to sell unsafe product. Most regulations come about because of people LITERALLY dying. If you think removing that power is a good thing it can only come from a place of malicious greed or ignorance.
@@KuariThunderclaw
Cool well poisoning.
@@DarkMatterX1 Well poisoning is if I targeted an individual. I'm going straight to the facts of the matter. If you're going to make a logical fallacy argument, at least make sure you know what the term means.
@@KuariThunderclaw
"If you think...malicious greed or ignorance."
This is character assassination of anyone who disagrees with you. The explicit purpose of which is to disregard as invalid any reasons - either personal or professional - any philosophical opponent of yours may hold, and indisputably label them as nefarious actors. It is _textbook_ well poisoning.
E: typo - _anyine > anyone_