Honestly, the 18 FPS one is way better in my eyes. Not only is it acutally manually animated by a real human being, but it generally looks more natural and cartoonish. 180FPS Just looks like it was deep fried and unnatural. Not to mention the smear frames look absolutely deep fried (yes, i know i said that twice) and blurred.
Interpolated videos can be hard to look at. They’re often blurry, due to the AI not quite understanding what things are or how they should move. This video is even worse, as it also fuses many frames together, since obviously UA-cam doesn’t support 180 FPS
@@NummyGD the only good part with 180 is the saw one because as the weird creature thing holds the saw out it shakes because of gravity and 180 just makes it slightly better but the others are worse
If you get over how much it hurts to look at 180 it’s so smooth it’s amazing but if you slow it down it’s even more amazing how many glitches are in it
im an animator and i prefer 18 cuz ai ignores basically every 12 principles of animation and has glitches that smear some parts of the animated person and blur it, 18 fps looks more natural
sinceramente, o de 18 é muito melhor do que o de 180, pois o De 180 é demais para o UA-cam suportar e também porque as IAs não entendem como as coisas deveriam se mover direito, assim se cria manchas e borrões, o de 18 FPS é facilmente suportado pelo UA-cam, e as IAs sabem muito bem como e o que deve se mover, o original, que eu já vi, parece ter 30 ou 40 FPS. Não sei se algum tipo de ilusão ou algo do tipo honestly, the 18 is much better than the 180, because the 180 is too much for UA-cam to handle and also because the AIs don't understand how things should move properly, so it creates smudges and blurs, the 18 FPS one is easily supported by UA-cam, and the AIs know very well how and what should move, the original, which I've seen, seems to have 30 or 40. I don't know if it's some kind of illusion or something
@@Team_FireGiraffe Did you get permission from Aimkid to run their work through an AI and re-upload their entire animation? I'm not lying. I'm stating what's clearly happening.
@@Team_FireGiraffeIf you _really_ cared about Aimkid and their animations, you would link to the original video and link their Patreon. Just @-ing the account is not enough for the amount of bs this is. You only care about getting views and subscribers. You don't care about Aimkid.
Actually i would prefer 18 because youtube doesn't actually support vids above 60fps but with 180fps, Its like giving me the headache and the frames in between are blurry if you pause quickly and 180fps looks a lil faster than 18fps
For some reason modify sounds like it would be on the radio and you would be listening to it while driving in the night while it was still 2012 or 2015
With the interpolated version, I can see what's happening better, because it's smoother. I do think 180FPS is too much, and I would much rather prefer like 24, because I think it would still keep some of that nice imperfect feel from the original.
WHY DO PEOPLE ENJOY THIS PLS PAUSE ON ANY MOVEMENT jeez can people have any respect for artists it can’t even tell what part of the body is what god I hate AI frames this coming from an artist by the way
Honestly, the 18 FPS one is way better in my eyes. Not only is it acutally manually animated by a real human being, but it generally looks more natural and cartoonish. 180FPS Just looks like it was deep fried and unnatural. Not to mention the smear frames look absolutely deep fried (yes, i know i said that twice) and blurred.
"deep fried" lmao
Dude my eyes said the 180Fps one is better i hate my eyes rn
Do you even know what deep fried means?
@@jovinorlandez5663 yes?..
@@jovinorlandez5663 yes, but itwas an expression
I guess you can say that the animation was "Modified"
the one thing youre not allowed to modify
*Rimshot* Wow your worse then family guy with that joke🙃
@@ConfusionGaming64 Laugh please 🙏
Hahahahaha…
HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA
GOOD ONE
At one point i was only looking at the 18FPS one because the 180 was hurting me on my eyes and emotionally
Interpolated videos can be hard to look at. They’re often blurry, due to the AI not quite understanding what things are or how they should move.
This video is even worse, as it also fuses many frames together, since obviously UA-cam doesn’t support 180 FPS
same
Fact:
@@NummyGD the only good part with 180 is the saw one because as the weird creature thing holds the saw out it shakes because of gravity and 180 just makes it slightly better but the others are worse
180 fps feels too smooth for regular animation
It depends, lower fps make the animation leave an impact, but having some smooth frames CAN help sometimes
Smear frames are useful.
It’s just 18 fps already looked smooth there was no point of making it 180 it would work if it was like 48 or 30
@@SierraRail3Prodalso there’s already smears look at 2:14
I feel like smoother, 'bouncier' movements fit better with the song
@@SierraRail3Prod theres a difference between smear frames and the frames being smeared
Honestly, the ultra heightened fps really sells the surreal nature of the song, but i would rather want a 48fps version with credit
For small mouvements, 180 fps looks very clean, but big movements are murdered and all their impact has been removed
this song gets darker the more you listen to it
True
Is it morally not good that I want to make an OC based on this song? maybe
Do I care? Sharks will learn to fly first
I know
Tis the point
@@ModerationLabs i made this comment almost a year ago dumbass
18 fps is better, the way its animated actually fits on that fps and 180 is honestly somewhat hard to follow at some points
When you find out you're watching both in 30fps because UA-cam
Thats not how it works you can change the fps if the footage is recorded not at 30
180 fps (adds more extra 9 frames for the next frames in 18) 180 makes the extra created frames motionblurred and deformed
18 Fps: looks good
180 Fps: *D E A P F R I E D*
using ai to “enhance” animations is a middle finger towards human animators
If you get over how much it hurts to look at 180 it’s so smooth it’s amazing but if you slow it down it’s even more amazing how many glitches are in it
im an animator and i prefer 18 cuz ai ignores basically every 12 principles of animation and has glitches that smear some parts of the animated person and blur it, 18 fps looks more natural
YES FINALLY SOMEONE THAT HAS EYES AND IS EXPERIENCED WITH ANIMATION AND CA. GIVE REASONS WHY ITS SO TERRIBLE
THANK YOU! A FELLOW ANIMATOR!
finally, someone who can SEE.
sinceramente, o de 18 é muito melhor do que o de 180, pois o De 180 é demais para o UA-cam suportar e também porque as IAs não entendem como as coisas deveriam se mover direito, assim se cria manchas e borrões, o de 18 FPS é facilmente suportado pelo UA-cam, e as IAs sabem muito bem como e o que deve se mover, o original, que eu já vi, parece ter 30 ou 40 FPS. Não sei se algum tipo de ilusão ou algo do tipo
honestly, the 18 is much better than the 180, because the 180 is too much for UA-cam to handle and also because the AIs don't understand how things should move properly, so it creates smudges and blurs, the 18 FPS one is easily supported by UA-cam, and the AIs know very well how and what should move, the original, which I've seen, seems to have 30 or 40. I don't know if it's some kind of illusion or something
2:30 scared me
bro really needs to make a series of this, the animation is great
Please no, they're not even linking back to Aimkid's original animation. This is blatant theft and disfiguration of Aimkid's hard work.
@@randompasserbyer ah
@@randompasserbyer stop lying
@@Team_FireGiraffe Did you get permission from Aimkid to run their work through an AI and re-upload their entire animation? I'm not lying. I'm stating what's clearly happening.
@@Team_FireGiraffeIf you _really_ cared about Aimkid and their animations, you would link to the original video and link their Patreon. Just @-ing the account is not enough for the amount of bs this is. You only care about getting views and subscribers. You don't care about Aimkid.
why is no one talking about the fact that the title says the first word as ‘whoch’ instead of ‘which’
I like the 180 fps because the transitions just look way better but i could understand the reasons of why people like the 18 more
*it’s because it starts so bad at the start, like it looks laggy*
I think why people like the 18 fps more is because it doesn't have the smear frames (or whatever they're called...)
Bro slow the video down
@@Statronicai does not have smear frames it has goo
@@PintoBeeanif you have to slow the video down *yourself* to make someone else’s animation look better then i don’t think it’s good in the first place
18 Fp by a long shot
Actually i would prefer 18 because youtube doesn't actually support vids above 60fps but with 180fps, Its like giving me the headache and the frames in between are blurry if you pause quickly and 180fps looks a lil faster than 18fps
Song: Modify by Lemon Demon
Animator: Aimkid
It's like comparing regular headphones to airpods. Airpods are trying to be better, but fail.
I LOVE 18 FPS! It feels more cartoony and I had more of an idea what was going on rather than the 180 FOS
18fps is more my style, 180 fps looks like the regular animation but put through motion blur.
Watch this in .5 speed it looks like total ass no matter how smooth it is it looks objectively worse unless you have no sense of taste
Well it looks worse beyond comprehension at 5 speed but at normal speed it looks decent but overall 18 fps
18 fps: more like an animation
180 fps: the movements look blured and it looks kinda smooth
For some reason modify sounds like it would be on the radio and you would be listening to it while driving in the night while it was still 2012 or 2015
Why change the video framerate? It was already good with just 18 fps
Wow the fps upscaling(?) Technology got real good real quick... Cant be compared to old, blurry algos
Slow tge video to .5
The 180 fps one is too smooth for my brain to comprehend, so I like the 18 fps one better
lmao look at the warping and morphing
With the interpolated version, I can see what's happening better, because it's smoother. I do think 180FPS is too much, and I would much rather prefer like 24, because I think it would still keep some of that nice imperfect feel from the original.
Slow the video to .5
I like both tbh I love the song to
The 180 seems better for me since it feels smoother
180 fps I like tweening
18 fps looks better tbh. The smear frames are... interesting. Also, the fps increasing tech is for LIVE ACTION, making the weird smears.
Roses are red,
Violets are blue,
Im liking my own comment,
Cuz no one else wants to
My life in a nutshell:
one of my fav lemon demon songs beside amnesia was her name! :3
dont use ai to make the fps higher, please, people will hate you if you do more! cause.. its the internet!
The 180 is TOO good to feel normal.
18FPS is honestly WAYY better, since it doesn't hurt to look at.
The 180 is made by ia rendering
0:08 Now im fuck💀
Above 60 fps hurts my eyes also causing me getting headaches
I say the original is better
Cartoons be like:
WHY DO PEOPLE ENJOY THIS PLS PAUSE ON ANY MOVEMENT jeez can people have any respect for artists it can’t even tell what part of the body is what god I hate AI frames this coming from an artist by the way
180 fps is too smooth and ugly in a way.
Attention! This was animated by Aimkid but the song was made by lemon demon!
Look at the 180 fps in 0.25 speed 💀
Id say the best option would be something in between 18 and 180
180 Fps Is Smooth, The 18 Fps Is Uh- Idk What the word is, 8 Bit-Tastic?, I'll Go With 18 Fps Cuz Everyone Is Choosing 18 Fps, I Think.
180 fps looks goofyer
18 fps looks more cartoonish
18
What did I just watch. I know that this is an FPS test but seriously, what in the world was that?
Whoch
i haven't seen this song like years
18 fps 180 is TO blurred
you missed spelled which in the title.
Even you misspelled misspelled
bruh even you missesdpelled misspelled
@@sparklesquadqueen and you
I say the 180 FPS is nice
The second I noticed they were slightly out of sync with eachother they both became horrid sins in my eyes. /j
Honestly 18 fps looks just as if not even more smooth
Boomerang: *give the man a contract..*
Featuring next on boomerang!! Modify: 9:00-10:25PM
What are you on?
@@Hadeth_a_stepa everything :]
W h o c h
18 duh
180 is the frame rate my dreams are in after not sleeping for a few days so idk dude
I like the 180 one
Why
Slow the video down to .5 and youll see why its so hated
@@PintoBeean180 is good
@@PintoBeeanprob because he thinks it’s smooth
@@SonicTailsKnucklesgangIt May be more smooth but the blur, the fact that there is almost no human can draw 180 fps for one second each it’s just-
UA-cam can’t show 180fps. Only up to 60
exactly 180 is 60ft
@@-------e227 what do u mean?
@@fusion1203 ft = fps I seen that :200: fps videos there gust 60 fps
Just
@@-------e227 oh, yeah youtube doesn’t support higher framerates
18.
original one looks like 0 fps now
That almost freaked me out
What song called
Lemon Demon - Modify
*PUTS MIDDL FINGER* Me: HEY
Lol whoch!?!?!
You can see the difference between the two.
180: Smeared, too early with animation which makes 18 delayed, blur, too smooth, looks slow in my eyes even though its faster then 18
2:02 killed train hater
The animation looks like every frame is a smear
180 takes the phrase 'smear frame' a bit too literally
Team 180 fps is better than 18 fps
18 fps way better, 180 fps looks more smoggy and blurry
HEY I HAVE INSHOT
180 please its smoother than 18
18 better
in a video 180 is better it no longer shows only bad frames edit: if you attempt to start drama in this comment I’ll delete it
erm actually 18 fps is more natural so your point is wrong (you can delete this comment now)
180 FPS weirdly unnatural and the added on frames do add anything but blurry mess
Ironically 18 fps is smoother
180 is better clearly
180 looks like a hatsune miku animation
Lyrics:
Howie thought brass was the height of style, Now it's got something on the steam punk smile, and it's alright. Pt2?
U😊
Why would 180 fps look any good
18 fps is cooler
IN FPS 1380 IT MAKE ME LAUGH
18 fps because it’s the original
It's weird its like better half the time and worse half the time
I dont feel pain in my eyes
2:29 OUTRO JUMPSCARE
i dont feel like anything changed for some reason
original looks better
180 fps just looks like it kinda has AI
Which it is, it uses a neural network algorithm to generate extra frames
Am I the only one that does not see the difference