He's not the only one to say (and think) that - people who do this for a living have preferences (if only shaped by the converters and other equipment they use). It is what it is - if you don't hear it, or disagree, move on - no need to be negative.
This video is absolutely spot on. I've been working 3 years at 48k ... something just didn't sit right... Everything felt thin and open no body - too clean and "digital" - I checked a few of my mixes with A/B meter and behold the bass and snare had more body at 44.1
I would see no difference of using 44.1 kHz or 48 kHz. OPUS is a great lossy format, significantly better than OGG and MP3, but similar to AAC in terms of quality. Great use for broadcasting and music streaming. It's open source, but unfortunately it does not support 44.1 khz. Movies use 48 kHz, UA-cam uses 48 kHz (because they use OPUS, but at lower bitrates to save bandtwidth, but it's not a great audio source - still, there are a high number of people that use converters to 128 kbps MP3 44.1 kHz 🤦 ). But that 48 kHz is a divisor of 96 is not an argument, I think, because the sound frequency is increasing exponentially and not linear.
I have a prism converter and after listening I can understand what he’s saying. I’ve always been a fan of 88.2 on playback upsample of 44.1 cd’s and always prefer 44 (natural and smooth) to 48 myself… I can see where 96 has a level of realism that’s more exciting/ more overtones/ harmonic content than 88.2. I know a lot of people are going to roll their eyes, but I’ve seen a good bit of interviews with Jack and I love that he is so opinionated, confident, and eccentric. 🤘
Why not 48 and 96? Sounds like AD specific preference. Last time I argued about it, I showed my boss an 320kbps mp3 and WAV and told him both were WAVs and he picked the mp3. He was a big proponent of using 96 in our studios. You can really go insane if you think there is merit in it. Recording live instruments is fine, but for regular work is a waste of space.
I'm a hobbyist who just does stuff for fun. For me, 44k is good enough. The thing is, at 48k, you have to do 10% more calculations, which means taking 10% more CPU.
Well he is correct 48khz was only used for Video capability ( many things are that way the first CPUs for computers where 16 bit but they downgraded to 8 bit because peripheral for MFGs were plentiful
this is one of the most laughably stupid commentaries on sample rate I have ever heard. I suspect he knows this and did this video as some weird practical joke.
Some distribution platforms only accepts 16bit and some upto 24 bit. But for UA-cam, 24 is a must . When it comes to mixing and mastering, 32bit is a no brainer 💁🏻♂️
you are wrong!!! you can't convert correct sound from 44.1k to 48k(it's like resize lowRes picture), you should record sound on 48k itself - it's more soft sound - especially on high frequencies. 44.1k is lame!!!
@@MEMFISAKA not at all=)) high speed allows detailed high frequency recording = 48k it's like a "speed of vinyl" - for example in 32k you can record bass line, but not hi-hat/percussion. ппц ты тупица=))
He is right you know, 44.1 sounds better. I worked at 48 for a year now and it's a hustle. And the analog gear likes it more, he's right with everything he's saying. Now for everybody who has their knowledge from a youtube video and not from the field-with trained ears for at least 20 years...laugh all you want
I heard an engineer say TV commercials and incidental music has to be recorded with 48, this is only what the companies accept as the standard. Is this true?
lmao where is Dan Worrall when we need him the most
Ladies and gentlemen, mixing engineers.
He's not the only one to say (and think) that - people who do this for a living have preferences (if only shaped by the converters and other equipment they use). It is what it is - if you don't hear it, or disagree, move on - no need to be negative.
Nice This is all I needed to know & put so simply ❤
he doesn't like 48
he prefers 96 and 44.1
there u go
did we watch the same video???
he also has BIG credits! There you go
@@larrytan73 Credits or not, at the end of the day its an opinion, nothing more.
someone send this to dan worrall
Dan Worral is nothing compared to Puig in music industry, just another pop science youtuber). I bet Worral trying to avoid reacting to this vid)
@@77advanced fair enough , so is 96k is abetter option ?
Puig is a legend. Worral is a youtube legend.
@@77advanced pop science? The way you dismiss Dan is quite comical and should raise eyebrows. Can you elaborate on what you mean?
44.1k hell yeah!
SAME
44khz/24bit best compromise
This video is absolutely spot on. I've been working 3 years at 48k ... something just didn't sit right... Everything felt thin and open no body - too clean and "digital" - I checked a few of my mixes with A/B meter and behold the bass and snare had more body at 44.1
His hat blocks 48k
due to defect in my Scarlett USB audio interface, I need to use 44.1K. Good to hear
I'm still on 32 bit! 44k. I like 44k!
I would see no difference of using 44.1 kHz or 48 kHz. OPUS is a great lossy format, significantly better than OGG and MP3, but similar to AAC in terms of quality. Great use for broadcasting and music streaming. It's open source, but unfortunately it does not support 44.1 khz. Movies use 48 kHz, UA-cam uses 48 kHz (because they use OPUS, but at lower bitrates to save bandtwidth, but it's not a great audio source - still, there are a high number of people that use converters to 128 kbps MP3 44.1 kHz 🤦 ).
But that 48 kHz is a divisor of 96 is not an argument, I think, because the sound frequency is increasing exponentially and not linear.
You can rest assured this guy would fail an ABX test.
I have a prism converter and after listening I can understand what he’s saying. I’ve always been a fan of 88.2 on playback upsample of 44.1 cd’s and always prefer 44 (natural and smooth) to 48 myself… I can see where 96 has a level of realism that’s more exciting/ more overtones/ harmonic content than 88.2. I know a lot of people are going to roll their eyes, but I’ve seen a good bit of interviews with Jack and I love that he is so opinionated, confident, and eccentric. 🤘
44100 gang
Why not 48 and 96? Sounds like AD specific preference. Last time I argued about it, I showed my boss an 320kbps mp3 and WAV and told him both were WAVs and he picked the mp3. He was a big proponent of using 96 in our studios. You can really go insane if you think there is merit in it. Recording live instruments is fine, but for regular work is a waste of space.
I'm a hobbyist who just does stuff for fun. For me, 44k is good enough. The thing is, at 48k, you have to do 10% more calculations, which means taking 10% more CPU.
Well he is correct 48khz was only used for Video capability ( many things are that way the first CPUs for computers where 16 bit but they downgraded to 8 bit because peripheral for MFGs were plentiful
This might be the most debated topic I have ever come across, can someone please settle it for once lmfao
this is one of the most laughably stupid commentaries on sample rate I have ever heard. I suspect he knows this and did this video as some weird practical joke.
24/96
Uggg, is that why this guys plugins sound so bad? lol
32 bit when recording is a waste, nobody heard the difference to 24 and the DAW will upsample to 64bit internally anyway
sure buddy
Agreed 💯
AGREED
now the question, 16 bit or 24 bit
Some distribution platforms only accepts 16bit and some upto 24 bit. But for UA-cam, 24 is a must . When it comes to mixing and mastering, 32bit is a no brainer 💁🏻♂️
24 bits to avoid dithering when you record. you can bounce down the mix to 16bit at the end of you want to print to CD.
BOOOOMER
wut
is this a joke?
So what best sample rate audio for upload youtube Sir ? I guest 96k audio upload will bring better quality
UA-cam suggests 24bit 48k
@@ahawk706 Tks bro
you are wrong!!! you can't convert correct sound from 44.1k to 48k(it's like resize lowRes picture), you should record sound on 48k itself - it's more soft sound - especially on high frequencies. 44.1k is lame!!!
@@MEMFISAKA not at all=)) high speed allows detailed high frequency recording = 48k it's like a "speed of vinyl" - for example in 32k you can record bass line, but not hi-hat/percussion. ппц ты тупица=))
🤣
respec
He is right you know, 44.1 sounds better. I worked at 48 for a year now and it's a hustle. And the analog gear likes it more, he's right with everything he's saying. Now for everybody who has their knowledge from a youtube video and not from the field-with trained ears for at least 20 years...laugh all you want
I heard an engineer say TV commercials and incidental music has to be recorded with 48, this is only what the companies accept as the standard. Is this true?