No, in fact its the opposite. They use KGB/FSB tactics, have a few Russians connected and Ukraine sex workers/slaves. This corp. would of gave Russia as well as Trump the same info on people.
nick z *_Just so you'll be informed for change._* Correct me if I'm wrong but: 1) John podesta was hacked with the same fishing scam that was used on Jennifer Lawrence and every other celebrity caught in the fappening. (Send us your email will give you a free iPad) 2) The DNC emails could only have been done on site with a flash drive. 1.9GB of data downloaded in 20 minutes couldn't have happened over transcontinental internet. 3) Nothing could change the fact that Hillary Clinton was the most corrupt, sickly, incompetent, Democratic candidate of all time. Everyone who hated Hillary Clinton and Progressive politics joined forces in her defeat... *FAIR & SQUARE* 4) Progressives are using Russia to obfuscate the damage being done by 3 million Muslim men coming to their countries and demanding Social Services and sexual satisfaction. My guess is that this investigation will prove nothing but speculate on everything from Brexit to Putin to Trump 2016, but you know what they say about lies-- if you tell it enough times someone will believe it.
No, it goes hand in hand with the Russian narrative, but some progressives are determined to deny any and all evidence on that front. Yes, the U.S. has been interfering in elections around the world and is hypocritical to be outraged that Russia is doing it to the U.S. But to pretend the Russian troll farm operations didn't exist and that Putin isn't interested in destabilizing the U.S. is to have your head buried in the sand.
Would providing misleading personal information such as likes and dislikes be a means of sabotaging this operation? It seems to me they depend on information,what if they depend on false information? Will that dependency make their efforts at mind manipulation ineffective?
12:50 - OK I see, he believes that anyone who is younger than him and engages with social media, is a believer of fake news - but yet he is the most brainwashed by the traditional media with the real fake news. :D now I undestand why he hates trump indeed
I was totally for Brexit and I'm not living in UK. I was for Trump at the time of Elections in USA and I'm not American. I was for Le Pen, and I'm not French. Realise people aren't hoodwinked into how they vote or promote another candidate. At the end of the day you'd hope the proper votes were counted properly and the winner be the winner. At no time do I think Brexit was won by corruption.
Bill is good talking about economic matters. On this subject he was painful ... the bulk of his commentary was old news and he kept talking about the Trump Administration when the object was the Trump Campaign ... more specifically Bannon and Mercer. Cambridge Analytica was revealed as a player in the 2016 elections in 2016!
Instead of looking at for attacks on "crooked Hillary" on the comments here, I'll make up my own. CHRC (crooked Hilary Rodem Clinton) a.) had a different blah blah blah and except for this preemptive edit would continue through b.) ad infinitum qua qua qua. But seriously, it is nigh impossible to know how to absorb this context. THIS context. Am I some arbitrary individual sharing some random thoughts about the memeish current intrigue of the day, no matter how actually impactful the subject matter? Mostly, yes. Do I hope accomplish anything by posting this (THIS) entirely anonymous diatribe? Mostly just to replicate my own ideology in other people, incongruous of any notions of their preexisting ideologies, being the imperialist that I am. Conclusion: THIS is a socially futile exercise. It may stretch my elocutionary legs a bit but I am really not relating to anyone on any substantive level.
"the best way to rob a bank is to own one"
you sir, have won a fan. LOL
Doesn't this conflict with the Russia narrative?
No, in fact its the opposite. They use KGB/FSB tactics, have a few Russians connected and Ukraine sex workers/slaves. This corp. would of gave Russia as well as Trump the same info on people.
everything conflicts with the Russia narrative... just makes them double down. Fact impervious purposely obtuse warmongers.
nick z *_Just so you'll be informed for change._*
Correct me if I'm wrong but:
1) John podesta was hacked with the same fishing scam that was used on Jennifer Lawrence and every other celebrity caught in the fappening. (Send us your email will give you a free iPad)
2) The DNC emails could only have been done on site with a flash drive. 1.9GB of data downloaded in 20 minutes couldn't have happened over transcontinental internet.
3) Nothing could change the fact that Hillary Clinton was the most corrupt, sickly, incompetent, Democratic candidate of all time. Everyone who hated Hillary Clinton and Progressive politics joined forces in her defeat... *FAIR & SQUARE*
4) Progressives are using Russia to obfuscate the damage being done by 3 million Muslim men coming to their countries and demanding Social Services and sexual satisfaction.
My guess is that this investigation will prove nothing but speculate on everything from Brexit to Putin to Trump 2016, but you know what they say about lies-- if you tell it enough times someone will believe it.
How are these "KGB" tactics. Sounds precisely like the kind of thing John Perkins describes in Economic Hitman to me.
No, it goes hand in hand with the Russian narrative, but some progressives are determined to deny any and all evidence on that front. Yes, the U.S. has been interfering in elections around the world and is hypocritical to be outraged that Russia is doing it to the U.S. But to pretend the Russian troll farm operations didn't exist and that Putin isn't interested in destabilizing the U.S. is to have your head buried in the sand.
So, when do you suppose the CIA stopped using honey traps, extortion, and all the rest? And why did they stop?
They haven't stopped; neither have the Russians.
The Koch brothers have a similar "data collection" company called "i360" which is probably just as dangerous and slimy.
None of this means anything unless someone does something about.
...and someone (Trump) goes to prison.
This is something new in government espionage?
I love how this is the only news calling out the actual billionaire responsible, Mercer the Menace.
Would providing misleading personal information such as likes and dislikes be a means of sabotaging this operation?
It seems to me they depend on information,what if they depend on false information?
Will that dependency make their efforts at mind manipulation ineffective?
So Trump ended up being a open borders leftist a gun grabber who did everything for Israel and nothing for America.
The old man took his criminalistic professor expert position into a quite political opinion real fucking lightning fast.
12:50 - OK I see, he believes that anyone who is younger than him and engages with social media, is a believer of fake news - but yet he is the most brainwashed by the traditional media with the real fake news. :D now I undestand why he hates trump indeed
I was totally for Brexit and I'm not living in UK. I was for Trump at the time of Elections in USA and I'm not American. I was for Le Pen, and I'm not French. Realise people aren't hoodwinked into how they vote or promote another candidate. At the end of the day you'd hope the proper votes were counted properly and the winner be the winner. At no time do I think Brexit was won by corruption.
I am here because Sean combs/bad boy has ties to this family! Sick rich people! So tired of it!
santa is back!
"Owned by the billionaire Robert Mercer" Like Donald Trump.
Bill - go easier on the laughing gas.
Bill is good talking about economic matters.
On this subject he was painful ... the bulk of his commentary was old news and he kept talking about the Trump Administration when the object was the Trump Campaign ... more specifically Bannon and Mercer.
Cambridge Analytica was revealed as a player in the 2016 elections in 2016!
digital mercenaries.. great article
Instead of looking at for attacks on "crooked Hillary" on the comments here, I'll make up my own. CHRC (crooked Hilary Rodem Clinton) a.) had a different blah blah blah and except for this preemptive edit would continue through b.) ad infinitum qua qua qua.
But seriously, it is nigh impossible to know how to absorb this context. THIS context. Am I some arbitrary individual sharing some random thoughts about the memeish current intrigue of the day, no matter how actually impactful the subject matter? Mostly, yes. Do I hope accomplish anything by posting this (THIS) entirely anonymous diatribe? Mostly just to replicate my own ideology in other people, incongruous of any notions of their preexisting ideologies, being the imperialist that I am.
Conclusion: THIS is a socially futile exercise. It may stretch my elocutionary legs a bit but I am really not relating to anyone on any substantive level.