Це відео не доступне.
Перепрошуємо.

War Thunder Realistic: La-5FN [Energy Monster!]

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 28 лип 2018
  • War Thunder Realistic Gameplay.
    La-5FN Realistic Battle, Soviet mid tier fighter.
    War Thunder Soviet Realistic Battle (featuring La-5).
    War Thunder, Patch 1.79, Project X. La5 realistic footage.
    Today its time to fly out the La-5FN in a Realistic Battle. Flew out with the La5 yesterday for the first time since release of 1.79, Project X. And found out exactly what this plane is about, lets see how it went. Hope you enjoy :)
    Check all my La reviews here:
    • War Thunder La's
    Watch all my Soviet realistic Fighter reviews here:
    • War Thunder Soviet Rea...
    Watch all my Soviet Realistic Reviews here:
    • War Thunder Soviet Rea...
    Check all my realistic fighter reviews here:
    • War Thunder Realistic ...
    Watch the whole War Thunder Realistic playlist here: • War Thunder Realistic
    Subscribe here:
    / @jengar6258

КОМЕНТАРІ • 181

  • @jengar6258
    @jengar6258  6 років тому +31

    Hey guys, got a good old favorite of mine, the La-5FN. I used to fly that regularly in AB, and i felt that now i needed a revisit to this plane, and fly it in RB. Which i had only dont a few times, and not too succesfully back then. Let's check ;) Have a great day!

    • @left_ventricle
      @left_ventricle 6 років тому +2

      Jengar Please do a Spitfire Mk XVI

    • @maxsuarezmuller7186
      @maxsuarezmuller7186 6 років тому

      Jengar, Could you try ground RB ones? I would like to see you play some tanks or planes (in ground RB).

    • @jengar6258
      @jengar6258  6 років тому +1

      me playing tanks anytime soon is unrealistic ;)

    • @maxsuarezmuller7186
      @maxsuarezmuller7186 6 років тому +1

      Maybe, one day, you Will give it a try. I'll be waiting right here, on the Chanel :D

    • @jengar6258
      @jengar6258  6 років тому +1

      perhaps, when my son goes to school.

  • @meesvanwanrooij5663
    @meesvanwanrooij5663 6 років тому +62

    you sound tired Jengar, dont overwork yourself in this tropical dutch weather.

    • @Starfightingf104
      @Starfightingf104 6 років тому +4

      it's like at 80% the normal speed lol

    • @jengar6258
      @jengar6258  6 років тому +15

      i am rather tired indeed, lot of work, a heatwave, my son, the channel, there's enough to do, and never enough sleep.

  • @OlafOlafson84
    @OlafOlafson84 6 років тому +17

    Hey Jengar,
    I was the guy that put the plane on fire, MacBrain in WT. I watched the replay and yes, he would have gone down but I would have killed him in your situation aswell. Better shoot one down thats already damaged, than having a plane still flying and maybe beeing able to put guns on you or your teammates!
    Anyway was fun to fly with you!
    Greets

    • @jengar6258
      @jengar6258  6 років тому +5

      yeah, was a fun match mate, and i owe you a kill, if we ever meet again i'll bait for you :)

  • @daehyunkim6574
    @daehyunkim6574 6 років тому +9

    i luv it when he says
    'with wep'

  • @Robin9Hurricane
    @Robin9Hurricane 6 років тому +10

    There's a new tracer belt for ShVAKs, which is made of all FI-Ts. IMO it works brilliantly: people in my community always say that the round deals with the most damage is the fragmentation round for ShVAKs and B-20s, so I'm assuming that new tracer belt is the way to go.
    Also, I herd people saying long time ago that in PvP games Gaijin's server do not register all slugs that hit the target, but doing a statistical calculation. e.g. only 1/10 of the .50 slugs that hit the target is registered and calculated by the server, and the same concept applies for other auto-cannons but presumably with different parameters. I'm not sure if this is true, but it might explain why AI air targets are much more vulnerable than players' aircraft. This may also explain why Hispanos spark that much: they have low RPMs and the few rounds that actually hit might not be registered.
    And of course, great video my friend, learned a lot about La-5FN!

    • @jengar6258
      @jengar6258  6 років тому +2

      Thanks mate, i'll check that belt out next time! :)

  • @erhancicekci9402
    @erhancicekci9402 6 років тому +3

    Thanks for putting effort to entertain strangers throughout the internet couldnt be more thankful

  • @davidpoling7748
    @davidpoling7748 5 років тому +2

    words of wisdom from Jengar at the end. Great video as always!

    • @jengar6258
      @jengar6258  5 років тому +1

      damn, what did i say again? ;) and ty!

  • @Dodo-dp4cf
    @Dodo-dp4cf 6 років тому +4

    Wow
    Nice video.
    La-5 is deadly

    • @jengar6258
      @jengar6258  6 років тому +2

      thanks mate, it is indeed!

  • @jasunlg
    @jasunlg 6 років тому +1

    Excellent Video Jengar. Glad to see your'e still making quality War Thunder videos

    • @jengar6258
      @jengar6258  6 років тому +1

      Thanks mate, yeah, we're still going strong :)

  •  6 років тому +2

    Finally thx Jengar,I was really waiting for this.

    • @jengar6258
      @jengar6258  6 років тому +1

      You are welcome marko!

  • @josselin9301
    @josselin9301 6 років тому +3

    nice presentation Jengar! make my day :p

    • @jengar6258
      @jengar6258  6 років тому +2

      Thanks Josselin! good to hear :)

  • @noorbi4569
    @noorbi4569 6 років тому +13

    At 4.0 br it's really fast. Faster than any german plane and on par with the usa ones.

    • @jengar6258
      @jengar6258  6 років тому +2

      pretty fast, really fast, indeed. I agree with that, i mentioned that.

    • @The_Honcho
      @The_Honcho 5 років тому

      3.7 now xD

    • @anneallison6402
      @anneallison6402 3 роки тому

      now its 3.7, its the F2G of its BR

  • @MostEpicPlayz
    @MostEpicPlayz 6 років тому +1

    Great video! Always love the information you give with each plane.

    • @jengar6258
      @jengar6258  6 років тому +1

      Glad to hear that ryan!

  • @aerohydra3849
    @aerohydra3849 6 років тому +3

    Fastest I've ever snatched up a video lol. 15 minutes is a new record!
    Also, any chance you can review the Doras again? I think you know but the Flight Models have been changed in the recent patch.

    • @jengar6258
      @jengar6258  6 років тому +1

      yeah i do, i already revisited the a-4 and both ta's after the FM changes, and the dora's are next for germany ;)

  • @bigbluewhale3957
    @bigbluewhale3957 6 років тому +1

    Love this plane but had some trouble with it and its later developments (la-7, la-7B) thank you for the video!

    • @jengar6258
      @jengar6258  6 років тому +2

      la-7 is fantastic! i love that thing :)

  • @RhuBin02
    @RhuBin02 3 роки тому +1

    i have researched it mainly for that WT trailer maneuver

  • @lucars2856
    @lucars2856 6 років тому +21

    Jengar do you prefer the yaks or the las?

    • @dropd8288
      @dropd8288 6 років тому +4

      LRS2005 Gamer I'm betting he'll say yak. Any takers? I bet 5 imaginary dollars.

    • @jengar6258
      @jengar6258  6 років тому +13

      la-7 is my favorite russian plane ;)

    • @bilge677
      @bilge677 6 років тому +1

      Jengar wow i find the La-7 one of the worst, and the 5FN too. The La-9 is mediocre/decent and so is La-11. But i really like Yak-3, brilliant plane with good manoeuvrability and brilliant climb rate

    • @dropd8288
      @dropd8288 6 років тому +1

      @@bilge677 I disagree. I tend to annihilate teams (arcade, and not literally) with the La-9. Its a pretty tough little bird, and you can't afford to get hit by its weapons. I too love the yaks, but the La-9 was a pleasant surprise. Especially with how much it costs to research modules. I've found it worth it.

    • @Steve-nf4jx
      @Steve-nf4jx 5 років тому

      I like the la series, but not the lagg. So bad. Then the yak. For bnz

  • @NotDumbassable
    @NotDumbassable 5 років тому +4

    Wait what the La 5FN is facing planes from 1942? wtf?
    Historically, this plane was good enough to face Fw 190 A5s with no problem at all!

    • @Alexander_Snowden
      @Alexander_Snowden 4 роки тому

      It's because most Russian players don't have a clue what they're doing. Whenever I use any of the La series (even the 7b-20) I always give the axis a good spanking

    • @anneallison6402
      @anneallison6402 3 роки тому

      Its the F2G of its br

    • @feanorian5674
      @feanorian5674 3 роки тому

      The La-5FN was used at first time in 1943

    • @NotDumbassable
      @NotDumbassable 3 роки тому

      @@feanorian5674 Which is 1 year later than the 109 F4. If flown right, it will simply beat every German prop at its tier by default.

    • @feanorian5674
      @feanorian5674 3 роки тому

      @@NotDumbassable Exactly. For me, La-5FN was the better version of the all of La-5 variants. Base from history, Cuz it has better engine and manueveribility, also air combat on the eastern front ussual in low-medium altitude, which the Soviet fighters has better performance in that. That is made the La-5FN can counter the German fighters as well.

  • @kurbbusta685
    @kurbbusta685 6 років тому +6

    I love this aircraft but I suck at using it sooo badly 😂😂 I either end up crashing or burn through my ammunition.

    • @bigbluewhale3957
      @bigbluewhale3957 6 років тому +2

      iSkipper - Welcome to the club buddy xD

    • @jengar6258
      @jengar6258  6 років тому +2

      remember its ideal altitude :)

    • @kurbbusta685
      @kurbbusta685 6 років тому +1

      big blue whale Lol 😂 but it's still a fantastic beast nonetheless 😀

    • @kurbbusta685
      @kurbbusta685 6 років тому

      Jengar True that. I tried turn fighting against a Zero in this once...not making that mistake again 😂

    • @jengar6258
      @jengar6258  6 років тому +1

      hehe

  • @MrBadBoyob
    @MrBadBoyob 6 років тому +8

    Jengar now i am Offended , you and me had a Great fight in one of the matches you dident show here :( you started in the Clouds high up i was in a Prem sluggish P-51 .. I was soo hoping to see it :( :( awww sad guy here.

    • @jengar6258
      @jengar6258  6 років тому +3

      maybe next time mate :)

  • @anneallison6402
    @anneallison6402 3 роки тому +1

    Its the F2G of its br

  • @cleverlaziness
    @cleverlaziness 6 років тому +1

    A real classic

  • @ferrarisuper
    @ferrarisuper 4 роки тому +1

    Great video with another great plane...great against Germans but weak against Japan.
    12:56 Adam spotted

  • @dr.michaelr.foreman2170
    @dr.michaelr.foreman2170 6 років тому +7

    The 5FN is far better in IL2 Sturmovik. With the new engine upgrade, the 5FN has endless power. It has no problem going after bombers at 5k meters to 6k meters. Which demonstrates Gaijin's bias towards every other country but the OP Americans.

    • @dr.michaelr.foreman2170
      @dr.michaelr.foreman2170 6 років тому +1

      Me, I love turn fighting. Turn fighting on the deck is the best. Then energy fighting. I avoid B n Z

    • @jengar6258
      @jengar6258  6 років тому +1

      its close for me, i love everything ;) but b&Z is my base :)

    • @danmallery9142
      @danmallery9142 6 років тому +3

      Historically speaking, almost all Russian planes were crap at higher altitudes. If they are good in IL2 at those altitudes, it's IL2 that is historically inaccurate, not WT.

    • @dr.michaelr.foreman2170
      @dr.michaelr.foreman2170 6 років тому

      You are so full of shit

    • @danmallery9142
      @danmallery9142 6 років тому +3

      LOL, are you serious? This is such a well known fact it defies imagination that even a casual gamer with the slightest interest in Russian fighter aircraft would not know this. Here is and excerpt from www.warhistoryonline.com:
      "German test pilot Hans-Werner Lerche wrote a detailed report of his experiences flying the La-5FN, explaining that the new Soviet fighter excelled at altitudes below 3,000 meters, and its performance at this altitude was comparable to Luftwaffe fighters. He also noted that the new Lavochkin possessed superior maneuverability in some regards. Both German fighters, however, outperformed the La-5FN at higher altitudes, though given the fact that the majority of the air war over the Eastern Front was fought below 3,000 meters, this was often not a problem."
      There are a myriad of other sources that say the same thing. The fighting on the Russian front was mostly at lower altitudes compared with ETO because neither side used high alt bombing campaign like the allies did over Germany.

  • @JumonkeyOnline
    @JumonkeyOnline 6 років тому +1

    Love this plane an old fav of mine :)

  • @nando_br
    @nando_br 6 років тому +2

    Nice video bro!

    • @jengar6258
      @jengar6258  6 років тому +1

      Thanks mate!

    • @felipedias9880
      @felipedias9880 6 років тому

      O adam514 tava do no mesmo time kkk 2 mitos

    • @nando_br
      @nando_br 6 років тому

      Nem vi o Adam. De vez em quando jogo com ele e contra ele, já até abati ele uma vez. Gente fina como o Jengar! O forte dele é a mira. o cara parece que é guiado a laser! Esses dias caí numa partida com o Messer Smitt, um que qse não vejo jogando mas joga muuuuito! Bem provável que vc tb conheça ele.

    • @jengar6258
      @jengar6258  6 років тому +1

      dont understand that guys.

    • @nando_br
      @nando_br 6 років тому +2

      Sorry Jengar! Felipe was talking about Adam514 beeing in the same team. Adam is also a WT youtuber and i was saying to him that Adam´s aim is incredible, like a laser guided aim and that i faced him a few times and killed him in a match! rsrs
      I also said that you and Adam are cool guys and also how Messer Smitt are a phenomenal player but it is rare to be in the matches! Greetings from Brazil!

  • @Essobee
    @Essobee 6 років тому +1

    *Tenacious FTFY
    Good videos!

  • @dedskin1
    @dedskin1 Рік тому +1

    thank you for telling me i can open my flaps up to 600km , i did it at 400km and lost both flaps ... just thanks .

    • @jengar6258
      @jengar6258  Рік тому

      you probably were in a high g move.

    • @dedskin1
      @dedskin1 Рік тому

      @@jengar6258 no straight , but not in arcade .

  • @michaeldebondt1236
    @michaeldebondt1236 3 роки тому +1

    Have it stock at the moment and i struggel with it guns verry dificult to get on target

    • @jengar6258
      @jengar6258  3 роки тому +1

      true that, its a scalpel of an airplane.!

    • @michaeldebondt1236
      @michaeldebondt1236 3 роки тому

      @@jengar6258 the i 185 seem to work much better for me

  • @brendannolan2508
    @brendannolan2508 6 років тому +1

    How does the La-5FN compare to the BF 109 F4 in vertical energy retention below 3km? I love the F4 but I'm very wary of La-5FNs now haha!

    • @jengar6258
      @jengar6258  6 років тому +3

      it's highly competative below 3k. and its fast there. got to be wary indeed.

    • @easetheweeb
      @easetheweeb 5 років тому

      the f4 just very barely has the edge, but a good pilot could turn your advantage into a reversal

  • @ellishumble8702
    @ellishumble8702 4 роки тому

    Hey Jengar, I follow you're vids all the time and love your teachings! With this plane though, I don't understand why you would call this a good plane to start of with in RB? It's not very manouvrable compared to the yaks for example, it stiffens up really hard in dives, it can't outrun a lot of planes and you get BnZd upon all the time because of the low alt performance. You have to master energy fighting first before you can actually pull it of in this one. I, for one, am having problems with this plane tbh (been playing for almost 2 years now).
    Greetings from a confused RB beginner

  • @leeham6230
    @leeham6230 10 місяців тому

    What is purpose of being "energy monster" if its lock up with speed?

  • @Jupiter__001_
    @Jupiter__001_ 5 років тому +1

    Hello Jengar.
    I was a player of the game a long time ago (I think I joined in the update where Ground Forces were added; this is coincidental, however, as I only played air at the start), but I left for a period of a few years. I have now come back to the game, and I think I know in at least some detail all that has changed.
    I would like to learn proper energy fighting techniques, and would appreciate if you would make a tutorial of that.
    I am currently struggling in the game, as I either play too conservatively and my entire team dies before I can get a kill, or I die too early and get at most one kill.
    Naturally, this frustrates me, and I am quite near to quitting the game to fly a game that I currently have more fun with: Il-2 1946. However, I want to give WarThunder a chance to redeem itself (rather, a chance for me to redeem myself; my self esteem has been rather low as of late due to my inability to improve), and I figured you would be a good person to learn from.
    Have a great new year!
    PS: My name in-game is LightSpeedTravel, in case someone wants to look up my abysmal statcard. (Negative K:D in literally every plane I have... 😥)

    • @jengar6258
      @jengar6258  5 років тому +1

      you should check out my tutorial playlist and my Air Combar Maneuvers playlist first, and then see if you have any specific questions after that.

    • @Jupiter__001_
      @Jupiter__001_ 5 років тому

      @@jengar6258 Will do, thanks for replying. I have noticed that you make a point to read most comments on your videos. This is a good trait, and one that is lacking among many UA-camrs today!

    • @Jupiter__001_
      @Jupiter__001_ 5 років тому

      @@jengar6258 OK, I watched all the ACM videos (I had already watched your WT Tutorial playlist).
      I assume those are better got planes with good maneuverability? (incl. rollrate, so the Typhoon's already out of this one...)
      I tried the climbing spiral in a Bf 109 E-3, but found it too difficult to execute.
      I also don't really know when to use any of the maneuvers, except for the rolling scissors to force an overshoot, and the high yoyo.

    • @2milk867
      @2milk867 3 роки тому

      @@Jupiter__001_ Idk if you still play but here's a tip:
      Before you buy a plane do a little research on what type of fighter it is (energy fighter, turn fighter, boom n zoom).
      Also, I usually stick with boom n zoom planes because I find them easier to fight with. But my point is you need to stick with planes that you enjoy flying.

  • @commanderfarsight2722
    @commanderfarsight2722 6 років тому +1

    Are the Do 335s on your list to cover? Im trying to get better with them and need tips

    • @jengar6258
      @jengar6258  6 років тому +2

      yes, one of them is on my to do list.

  • @stevegoesrogue
    @stevegoesrogue 6 років тому +1

    Question; Is it worth the loss in engine power of Russian Props to climb above 3000-4000 meters? It kinda seems counterintuitive in them as for a fighter, engine power is crucial. I've always been sort of offput from the Soviet fighters because of that.

    • @cptkotey
      @cptkotey 6 років тому +4

      Tsundere_Gaming, look at the web wiki page of a plane, there's a graph for the power per alt. For Russians it's ok to climb up to 6k and optimal for planes like i-185 or yak-9U. The problem is that you'll be alone up there.

    • @stevegoesrogue
      @stevegoesrogue 6 років тому +1

      Alright, I think I'll take a look next time I'm wanting to fly my Soviet fighters

    • @jengar6258
      @jengar6258  6 років тому +4

      yeah, i'd continue to climb to 6k max, though often while flying i stopped before that due to the development of the match.

  • @carmie8329
    @carmie8329 6 років тому

    Never really flew the russians since i climb normally and that makes me win a lot of times against them. I‘ll have a look at this plane tho

  • @JinEarin4
    @JinEarin4 6 років тому

    Since you're already playing La, maybe you would make a video about La-11?

    • @jengar6258
      @jengar6258  6 років тому +1

      i have a review up on that, which is a bit older. I wont revisit it soonish though.

  • @lee-ld7er
    @lee-ld7er 2 роки тому +1

    la 5 makes me afraid to dive.......

    • @jengar6258
      @jengar6258  2 роки тому +1

      Better then the yaks though ;)

  • @Agent-ic1pe
    @Agent-ic1pe 6 років тому

    I enjoy turnfighting and energy fighting, but I'm struggling to see how the La series has any advantage over the Yaks. Yaks are better turning (I think?) and it seems like they have similar roll rates, and that yaks stall better. Their top speed and rip speed seem comparable, and I myself have found the yaks to be very good energy fighters. But I haven't played the Las yet. So what am I missing? In what situation would a La be better?

    • @jengar6258
      @jengar6258  6 років тому +2

      i like both lines a lot, i've not flown russians a lot lately though, props that is, i flew the jets more lately. If i remember the yaks correctly, the la's start with double 20's earlier. And are in general more maneuverable. i think the yak's are slightly faster and a bit better in a dive, but not a lot. I'll have to fly a few more of them again to get the differences more frech again.

    • @Agent-ic1pe
      @Agent-ic1pe 6 років тому

      Yeah, the La planes get double 20s much earlier. I was under the impression that yaks are more maneuverable, but I also have some more flying to do before I can say so for sure!

  • @NeoGaymer
    @NeoGaymer 6 років тому +1

    hey . im a noob , i dont know all the key bindings. so i have a question :
    how are u able to control your plan while doing a freelook ( holding C ) as u do in around 7:00 ?

    • @dropd8288
      @dropd8288 6 років тому +1

      Amir Tabassi he's using keyboard for all flight controls, mouse is camera only.

    • @NeoGaymer
      @NeoGaymer 6 років тому +1

      wow. what about aiming? he aims with mouse right?

    • @dropd8288
      @dropd8288 6 років тому +1

      Amir Tabassi I don't know, its not the way I have my controls configured. Mine are mostly default. Try googling it, you should find something useful. I have looked it up before, just didn't want to actually do it. Too lazy to unlearn default controls and learn a whole new setup lol

    • @jengar6258
      @jengar6258  6 років тому +1

      you should check my defensive flying tutorial ;)

    • @NeoGaymer
      @NeoGaymer 6 років тому

      alright. tnx everyone

  • @Willy-ci2lu
    @Willy-ci2lu 6 років тому +1

    hello jengar did you consider playing tournaments

    • @jengar6258
      @jengar6258  6 років тому +3

      no time willy! im usually either working, playing with my son, or sleeping when these tournaments take place.

  • @gibmeleclercplz6025
    @gibmeleclercplz6025 6 років тому

    I think air realistic is now way far from good balance. Bf 109 and Italian planes are dominating whole meta.. their win rate are most likely above 60~70% now.

    • @jengar6258
      @jengar6258  6 років тому +1

      strange though that most of my other planes are also between 60-70%

  • @nicololopiparo6941
    @nicololopiparo6941 6 років тому

    Jengar I was thinking about joining your squadron if possible,have you got any discord or something?

    • @jengar6258
      @jengar6258  6 років тому +1

      we have a squadron discord sure. just apply ingame, and your application will be picked up.

    • @nicololopiparo6941
      @nicololopiparo6941 6 років тому

      Done :D

  • @marinuscaous7499
    @marinuscaous7499 6 років тому

    What is the best plane of Warthunder in your oppinion?

    • @jengar6258
      @jengar6258  6 років тому +1

      that question is way too broad. for bombing? for attacking? as a boom & zoomer? or for turnfighting? the best firepower? or the best loadout options? There is no one best plane in WT.

  • @marseldagistani1989
    @marseldagistani1989 5 років тому +1

    What are best for the 20mm ShVak.

    • @jengar6258
      @jengar6258  5 років тому +1

      the compositions have changed, but i've always liked stealth and ground belts. But there may be a better belt atm.

    • @marseldagistani1989
      @marseldagistani1989 5 років тому

      @@jengar6258 THX

  • @kya6816
    @kya6816 6 років тому +2

    Lel Ai AAA is op

  • @Fred-F4
    @Fred-F4 6 років тому

    please do a video on bf 109 k after the recent changes

    • @jengar6258
      @jengar6258  6 років тому +1

      i have a video up on the plane after recent changes, unless there's been new recent changes ;) its still relevant as far as i know.

    • @jengar6258
      @jengar6258  6 років тому +1

      check my 109 playlist.

  • @csd2168
    @csd2168 5 років тому

    This thing looks like it should at least be at 4.0

    • @jengar6258
      @jengar6258  5 років тому +2

      it is 4.0, and i mentioned it ;)

  • @nkord7457
    @nkord7457 6 років тому

    hi Jengar how are you ... i have a request . i ask for a loop about the most important setting for this game . if previously explained kindly give me the link

    • @jengar6258
      @jengar6258  6 років тому +1

      what do you mean exactly?

    • @nkord7457
      @nkord7457 6 років тому

      i need full explanation about the war thunder ( Aviation ) and beste settings for Options and controls . can you do that , greetings to you Jengar

  • @kingghidorah8106
    @kingghidorah8106 4 роки тому

    "Energy monster"
    Me: *No.*

    • @jengar6258
      @jengar6258  4 роки тому +1

      i must have mentioned somewhere on the mifd to low altitudes. When i flew it for the video it was indeed a monster below 3500-4000 meters. if something changed then shame to gaijin. This puppy used to be beautifull.

    • @kingghidorah8106
      @kingghidorah8106 4 роки тому

      @@jengar6258 It's not now. Only in Arcade. In RB you can barely climb with WEP. It has a long lasting engine but other than being ridiculously beautiful... this plane sucks. Most Russian propeller driven aircraft suck. They can't turn, they can't retain energy, their guns are inaccurate, low ammo belt, guns overheat fast, heavy but little to no armor, get shot down easily by anything that turns better, retains energy better or has the slightliest better (whatever that's important). Gaijin has a serious problem, and it's that they apparently demonstrate they have never seen a FW190 out turning a Spitfire or an I-16 Rata climbing up vertically for 2km without losing any small percentage of energy.

  • @antikoala
    @antikoala 6 років тому

    and how is this LA 5FN compared to I-185 m-82 located at the same br?

    • @jengar6258
      @jengar6258  6 років тому +2

      very different planes, the I-185's are the russian high altitude props.

    • @antikoala
      @antikoala 6 років тому

      thanks

  • @jercki72
    @jercki72 6 років тому +1

    hello Adam

  • @jet-junkie
    @jet-junkie 6 років тому +1

    What’s the intro music?

    • @jengar6258
      @jengar6258  6 років тому +1

      stage dive by silent partner

    • @jet-junkie
      @jet-junkie 6 років тому +1

      Jengar thank you :3

    • @jet-junkie
      @jet-junkie 6 років тому +1

      Jengar also keep up the good work! I love your vids

    • @jengar6258
      @jengar6258  6 років тому +1

      Thanks chase!

  • @pranavarvind4281
    @pranavarvind4281 4 роки тому +1

    7:50 Going vertical with a 109? Wow.

    • @jengar6258
      @jengar6258  4 роки тому +1

      on that altirude the la-5fn will win usually.

  • @Ihaveluigi7826
    @Ihaveluigi7826 6 років тому

    What belt do you use in shvak??

    • @jengar6258
      @jengar6258  6 років тому +1

      if you listened to the video you'll hear what i used ;)

    • @Ihaveluigi7826
      @Ihaveluigi7826 6 років тому

      Jengar oh really sorry, I had a bad habit that only concentrates to visual things with reducing sound
      when I see the vedio with other languages.
      I saw it again and it is 'ground target' .
      Thanks for a nice war thunder vedio.

    • @jengar6258
      @jengar6258  6 років тому +1

      np, and you're right :) i did use ground targets.

  • @meehzinhoo276
    @meehzinhoo276 6 років тому

    But the la séries are high alt Fighters

  • @csd2168
    @csd2168 5 років тому

    Why is this plane fighting spit mk 2s?

    • @jengar6258
      @jengar6258  5 років тому +1

      downtiered it can fight 3.0 at the lowest.

  • @fishback655
    @fishback655 6 років тому +1

    When soviet versus japan, soviets are just slaughtered by japan....

    • @jengar6258
      @jengar6258  6 років тому +1

      most of the time yeah.

  • @timotheetoury5097
    @timotheetoury5097 4 роки тому

    I think i've encountered one of the most annoying player of the game he had 4kills so he should be good and level100, with an american a6m2 (so we agree with good maneuvres you can dominate prettymuch everyone) we were 2 left, me in la5 and a yak9 against him. he just stayed around his airfield thinking we were going to dive on the aa.... he climbed enough i hit him twice before he dive obviously.. and i have to go refuel, my teamate dive and rip the wing of his yak and when got refuel and takeoff the time i found him the zero just destroy trucks to end the game, i dont understand if i had his situation with a zero i would have not hesitate one second to go in the middle of the field and defeat the 2 last fighters to have 6 kills, i mean does he really deserve his level100 for this type of gameplay this annoyed me A LOT

    • @jengar6258
      @jengar6258  4 роки тому +1

      lvl100 means nothing, everyone gets that eventually, it tells you nothing about the kind of pilot he is.

    • @timotheetoury5097
      @timotheetoury5097 4 роки тому

      @@jengar6258 yeah its true it could be more a tankiste than a pilot but i still dont understand maybe he was like "4kills is enough i want to end the game" but not me and im shure you will agree with me that a good zero pilote can slip between the fingers of anyone so why play like a fragile little bomber, and even in a bomber you can play an agressive style (bomber hunter and ground pounding in the sunderland for example) i'll never get it this is not my fighting philosophy, if i have even 1% of victory i'll still fight at least i can take some enemies with me

  • @soundwave429
    @soundwave429 3 роки тому

    It's neither rugged nor simple nor tencaious
    What kind of stupid description is that

  • @somebody1828
    @somebody1828 3 роки тому

    ITS A SHIT PLANE STOP SAYING THATS A GOOD PLANE PRETTY MUCH EVERY OTHER FIGHTER AT THIS BR IS BETTER!

  • @happyduckling8401
    @happyduckling8401 6 років тому

    Love u jengar but I wanted to be the first dislike. Hope u forgive me

    • @jengar6258
      @jengar6258  6 років тому +1

      strange reason to dislike ;)