These Paradoxes Keep Scientists Awake At Night!
Вставка
- Опубліковано 28 лют 2023
- These Paradoxes Keep Scientists Awake At Night!
► Subscribe: goo.gl/r5jd1F
The human brain is one of the smartest on the planet. But there are some things we just can’t wrap our minds around. One of those is the paradox.
We’ve evolved to think of reality in a specific way, but there are paradoxes out there that suggest reality doesn’t work the way we think it does.
And now some physicists think they have solved a 50 year old paradox...but have they? And what are the other strangest paradoxes? Get ready to find out!
We are on social media:
/ destinymediaa
/ destiny.med. .
The Destiny voice:
www.TomsVoiceovers.co.uk
I am just here to go to sleep
Yes
Same
This is perfect.
89uio
thought i was the only one that likes to sleep to space documentaries 😊
The missing sock paradox. It is thought that all washers and dryers have a device built in them to send one sock to the other side of the universe. When we finally discover it, all peace on earth shall be restored.
Built by the same company that designs red traffic light attractors for our cars.
bring it im ready
Lmfao
So u saying your blue
In my home, missing socks get reincarnated into Tupperware lids. They have created a small army on the top shelf of my cupboard and will tumble down on my head when provoked
The more I watch the more I get into the paradoxes myself. I like these.
The real deal is when you fully let go of everything during the meditation & focus your Consiousness in the middle of the eyes, it will open up like a swirling energy vortex and your Consiousness will travel through it and you will know everything.
We are not alone! We are energy. ⚡👁️🧘♂️
Super cell
There are no paradoxes in nature, just lack of knowledge on our part.
And our lack of knowledge is bound to the fact that we are still to blind to see whats going on right now - because we are staring literally in to the past and watching a god damn recording instead of the real time feed. I think the problem that is to solve is our way of looking - at the moment we learn how to see the actual universe live in this second, we are able to see whats really going on out there.
@@Vant1ca I’m gonna. Gvivi
LMAOOOOOOO
What about when fry touched himself
The grandfather paradox will never be answered so that is a paradox.
I could solve these paradoxes, I just don't want to
Too little space in the margin?
The bs paradox
42
Smart!? People need to find out for themselves all we can do is? Give them a key they already have. In there spiritual brain created before birth. This part of the brain? Sealed with man's intelligence
😂😂😂
The one thing that scares me most about dying is that I will never get to see how much science humans will achieve... Missing out on future technology really frightens me. It's like when you leave the club early because it's a bit crap only to find out the day after a famous DJ arrived with his celebrity friends 30 minutes after you'd left and the place was bumping to 6am with free drinks.
You wont miss anything but the downfall and slow death of the environment and all creatures that depend on it
The environment is fine and you never die.
You have no idea what happens when you die. Personally, I think the idea that consciousness ends as the physical body dies is absurd.
@@proxy8918 thats just wishful thinking. We aren't special. We are born , we live , then we die, end of story. Just like before you were born, you will not exist in any way shape or form after you die...
@@proxy8918 if it is absurd can u explain the obsurdity to me please. What do U think happens to our consciousness our awareness our memories our spiritual soul self. What happens to our individual essence when our heart stops beating. U feel that our awareness continues? So If so, after I die in this body and am inserted into a new form. Am I aware of my previous time alive? Also, where would u draw the line of consciousness. Is a dog conscious. Does a dog have a soul? What is needed to have a soul? Is it awareness of our own mortality that separates us? I’m curious.
“It doesn’t matter how beautiful your theory is, it doesn’t matter how smart you are. If it doesn’t agree with experiment, it’s wrong. In that simple statement is the key to science”.- Richard Feynman
Explains why scientists are so closed minded.
@@zoeyrochellezhombie829 Closed minded to nonsense that you believe? Yes.
@anorak1 Oh, that's a good one. Is that yours or do you know who said it?
The idea of a Dyson’s Sphere or Ring has always blown my mind! The scale alone is inconceivable, especially considering that most people don’t have a concept of the gargantuan size of our Sun. A stellar structure would require the mining of other planets and technology so advanced it seems magical.
If immortality could be achieved, I’d like to witness the evolution of our civilization.
I know, right! I mean, you’d think we’d probably need to crumble an entire solar system to have enough resources, but, if you rearrange molecular structures to create a lattice with as much space between molecules as possible, you could probably fill up more space with substantially less material. Think massive 3D printers! Hahahaha. Love throwing around ideas as long as there is potential reality for them!
Think molecular origami!
It's big but it's not that big. Our sun's actually pretty small lol.
@@DJHeroMasta LOL? It’s not that big? In terms of size, our sun is considered a medium-sized star. There are both smaller and larger stars in the universe. Our sun has a diameter of about 1.39 million kilometers (864,938 miles), which is about 109 times the diameter of Earth. That’s just the sun. Now, imagine you are building a Dyson sphere that is significantly larger than several levels of planetary orbits! Not that large? For a man made object? Get a grip. It’s a problem that you can’t just dismiss with a stupid ignorant thoughtless comment like yours. Go grow a lobe or two.
@@DJHeroMasta compared to other stars yes..but on a human scale it’s HUUUGE
@@oidbio2565 Yeah, it's not that big. Relative to earth it may seem big but what doesn't seem big compared to earth besides dwarf planets? Have you forgotten just how small our planet actually is? Ever think about the amount of raw materials just within our reach? There's *more* than enough. The "problem" would be a fuel source sufficient enough to transport those materials from other quadrants there and back but that's a conversation all in itself. But I don't think you're up for theoretical physics as you can't even fathom my previous comment. Thoughtless comment, sigh...if only you knew the daily thoughts that cross my frontal cortex. It's okay though, hopefully, in due time, you'll learn to expand your range of thought and will begin to ask more questions than you do make statements. Enjoy the rest of your day. ✌🏾
Scientists Wife "What's the problem Honey? "
Scientist " PARADOXES!!! Those Damned PARADOXES!!!"😂
You probably know this one...
A photon checks into a hotel. The concierge queries, "No luggage?"
The photon replies, "No, I'm travelling light."
My favourite science joke is - Pavlov is sitting in his favourite bar, enjoying a quiet drink. The bar's telephone rings and Pavlov exclaims, "Shit! I forgot to feed the dogs...."
LoL
Just love how this gets me thinking. So many what if's and it's amazing thinking different about reality and all the many possibilities out there beyond our reach.
I literally seen someone nebulize a whole family today .or parables got me rescued quarks and cloke rescue the people or what .
I don't know what is more scary.. the fact that we are not the only living beings in the universe or the fact that we are the only living beings in the universe
both are scary tbh
I never felt scared thinking there are other liiving beings out there at all. I'm not an alien-believer tinfoil crackhead, don't get me wrong, but A) the chance of there not being any life out there in the vast space (not necessarily carbon-based, mind you!) is extremely slim and we can only confitm/deny the existence of life in our small galaxy, as of now, and B) why would it be scary? Just like we don't get scared when we discover species here on Earth, nor do we get an existencial crysis when we know there are, say, deer, wolves, birds in a forest (e.g. other lifeformsthan us, humans), why would it be scary that there might be other lifeforms in space?
Definitely if we are the only living beings in the universe.
carl sagan
Carl Sagan
1. Fermi Paradox 0:37
2. Bootstrap Paradox 2:51
3. Grandfather Paradox 3:48
4. Talking Out Hitler Paradox 4:43
5. Red Sky Paradox 5:34
6. Paradox of the Oldest Star 9:40
7. Observer's Paradox 10:59
8. Double Slit Experiment 12:06
9. Faint Young Sun Paradox 13:34
10. Black hole information Paradox 15:49
11. Paradox of Missing dwarf galaxies 17:31
God comment🎉🙌🏽….saved my lil baby attention span 😭
❤
Nice! Thank you.
Is 17:00 as far as you got into the vid?
Ferni paradox explained by the Dark forrest theory
2:09 The James Webb Space Telescope has been operational for 14 months already. When was this video actually made? Also Shakespeare wrote "Hamlet". You did not, so the only other person left in the paradox, is Shakespeare who copied his own work.
I think it’s a bunch of their videos edited together. That’s why it’s over an hour. So some info may be a bit old
I thought the same thing. I was almost asleep when I heard that and had to go back to make sure I heard correctly and then immediately went to comments
@@jamesc8259 ah... makes sense
I guess that if Shakespeare had not written Hamlet until after we brought him a copy, then there would be no copy to bring him. So it would not work. I saw some paradoxes in Midnight in Paris. Owen Wilson meets some famous artists and writers in the 20s and quotes things they said. But if they had not said them until he meets them, then he would not have had any record of their saying them to quote to them and give them the idea. Of course, I am not that smart, so perhaps I overlooked something in these examples. And I do not care.
so if i copy an unknown book it's me who wrote it ?
I can imagine when our future generations look at these videos and realized how confused we were they will begin to understand why there was barely any actual documentation of our beginnings and this is humanities true baby steps
The beginning was a thought or idea. Developed over time to become controlled creation
In the World there is a thing called EVIL. These people want to control all people even eliminate them. They will destroy a good country to take control. Their #1 policy is lying to take power. They own all main stream News which does EVERYTHING they say. They are set on getting rid of all Good any religions. They mirror a similar Evil group exactly in WW2. They are hidden right now like the Evil group did. Do you see them? If you dont see them then you are part of them. They say the best place for Evil to hide is in your bed. lol You are being lied too.
Do you guys post audio only versions on other platforms? Would be awesome since it helps when I feel anxiety attacks coming and want something like this I can just listen and focus on…
Lol I feel dumb actually typing that but I’m sure others would like it for other reasons. Like conserving battery life or something
I use my phone , click on a video and turn the brightness all the way down !
Maybe a Type 4/5 civilization has already been achieved and we're currently living in one of its creations 🤪
Exactly
After death = good morning, did u like the experience?
Intro: 00:19
The Fermi Paradox: 00:38
The Drake Equation: 01:14
The Bootstrap Paradox: 02:52
The Grandfather Paradox: 03:48
The 'Taking Out Hitler' Paradox: 04:45
The Red Sky Paradox: 05:33
Polchinski's Paradox: 08:39
The Paradox Of The Oldest Star: 09:43
The Observer's Paradox: 11:00
The Double-Slit Experiment: 12:09
The Faint Young Sun Paradox: 13:34
The Black Hole Information Paradox: 15:48
The Paradox Of Missing Dwarf Galaxies: 17:32
The Dark Forest Theory: 34:29
Planets That Shouldn't Exist: 42:37
The Strongest Explosion In The Universe: 44:44
Little Physics 101: 51:20
Thanks!
Thank you😂
Q w ax xź
Thanks for the tally. I doubt any of these are news to any half-literate human.
Thank you!
The Kardashian paradox? How the hell did that happen? That keeps me up at night!
The hell is Kardashian paradox
Schrodinger wasn't saying the cat was both alive and dead simultaneously, he was saying that until observed both possibilities are true,
Like when someone goes missing
So with the double slit, again, it's not that the photons are simultaneously a wave and a particle function, but the act of observation causes them to change their function one way or other,
We could wish we never looked if we find another life form
Checkout: The Dark Forest hypothesis or the 3 body problem
We need to consider the possibility of the paradox being in our reality of visual abilities. We have only developed extended abilities in our own vision.
Infrared, nightvision, and so forth aren't that old. Other creatures on our own planet use many different ways of seeing things. Sonic, heat, and so forth. If there are parallel lines... then the way to which we would materialize their existences would also require their spectrums.
There's things we can't see that are on this earth at all times. No way we are the only ones in this universe..
This is super neat. Subscribe! This is so up my alley. I looked for the Parallel Universes video you said was in the description but i did not find it.
I recently noticed that whenever I'm exploring a subject, going deeper than just what's on the surface, I find there often will be some kind of a paradox involved there. It's so weird.
Your comment is so sincere. Really liked reading.
This reminds me of the time my wife and I visited her Turkish lady friend. She lived in a lake. I asked her " do you have a dock?" She answered, " of course I do, can't you see them swimming Around?".
@ Mike Did she have gills...she must have to live IN a lake.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
🤣🤣🤣
One means of meeting other entities would be through psychic projection which is usually discarded as superstitious nonsense. However, if possible, it would mean we could visit anywhere instantly with no speed limits. However, I doubt any human mind is capable of such a feat.
It does mean however, that other minds have already conquered this technique and are visiting us as we speak. Who is to know that we are not being used as avatars for an alien race?
@@jameswilliamsgbno it doesn’t. It just means you’re an idiot. Projection? Maybe. Psychic Projection? What the hell are you talking about. You’re just making shite up and trying to use it to make other conclusions. You might as well stick with reading Alice and Wonderland.
I've read claims of people who say they've astral projected from their bodies (ie their soul / essence / life force leaves their body and floats outside of it somewhere). These claims all say they feel they have a tether to their body, similar to an umbilical cord, and they feel that if it were to break, that would result in their death. Even if they didn't die, they felt it was unlikely they'd ever be able to re-enter their body if it broke. So they can only safely move as far away from their body as their tether allows them to. While this does seem to span a great distance (some claim to have floated in space), no one has ever suggested going anywhere near as far as another planet where they might see other living beings (at least not in any accounts I've ever read). So, even if such a form of movement were possible, it seems unlikely we could use that method of transportation to go to other worlds. It is interesting to think about, though.
I have read of near death experiences where people say they did die and did visit other worlds, and then they returned to their bodies ... but that requires one dying. Not a great option. :P
@@xzonia1 Thank you for your well thought out comment. 😊😊I can back up what you have read. I have had occasional experiences and, I was not any drugs when it happened. What I realized was, I had no idea what the name of the planet or celestial body I was on. Most planets have no name because we have not given them one. The chord that connects body and soul is sometimes referred to as the silver thread.
@@oidbio2565 I am sorry if you are not intelligent enough to understand and have to resort to insults. Go your own way, away from me, and remain dumb.
To flow all these theory's in sequence is phenomenal great job.
The double slit experiment boggled my mind the first time I heard about it. It still does as a matter of fact
It doesn't make sense that light acts differently when it knows you're looking at it
@@thomasdatrain4391 That's the (even weirder) thing, though. A photon doesn't actually "know" that it was observed. A conscious observer fixes it in space and time, but it is a non-sentient light particle. The only thing that makes sense then, to me, is that it didn't really settle to a fixed position. Something else has occurred, possibly something to do with human perception, maybe something to do with space-time, both, or neither. Fun to think about.
@@robynliteracy7057interesting
@@thomasdatrain4391I always viewed it as our minds or eyes perceive it differently.
Simulation theory would explain the lack of alien civilizations. It also explains why observing changes the behavior of materials. Without an observer, a computer doesn’t need to render, until you observe. Also, the speed limit of light , if you think of the substrate of the universe as pixels which have a certain refresh rate. So instead of light moving through space, it would actually be projected on one pixel, then the next.
We are in a matrix
I disagree. If life is a simulation, then, we create the game we want to play. So, the existence of alien civilizations is a matter of what we believe to be true, and what we experience as a result.
Since light travels at a finite speed (roughly) and everything you see around you is reflecting light at a different point in time.
(No matter how small a delta)
The further away an object is the further back in time you are seeing it.
Nothing you see or observe scientifically is REAL. It is all infinite different points in space time arranged in micro thin layers of instances of time like a massive onion. The observer at the center seeing the universe from that single perspective point.
The light from your computer screen hitting your eyes Picoseconds before the light from the wall behind it.
What are eyes and how do they distort the reality around you.
(BTW all this applies to sound waves as well)
Move your location. Totally different view with a slight difference in time.
You only see the light coming towards you,
Not the light and therefore the view of things from the opposite direction.
What would you see if you jumped to the other side of the universe and looked at things from "behind"??
Nothing stands on its own.
Everything is in constant motion.
Everything is constantly impacting everything else.
Betelguese is not about to go supernova
It already did in the distance past.
Your perception of reality may not be anywhere near what it actually is.....
Say what
Enrico Fermi had another computation which loosely could be called a paradox. When he was around military brass in the Pentagon and elsewhere he noted the meme "great general". He asked for a definition and after some discussion the high ranking officers came up with a general is a great general if he has won 5 battles in a row. He how many generals can be called great generals. After some discussion among brass hats they agreed that the proportion would be 3%. So Fermi asked if all other things were equal--number of troops, training, terrain and weapons (Lee almost won the Battle of Gettysburg) -- wouldn't the victory be a toss-up, a flip of a coin, 50-50? The officers agreed. Well, if 5 battles were like that the odds of one general winning all 5 would 1/2 * 1/2 * 1/2 * 1/2 *1/2. Right? Well that would be 1/32 which is 3.125%
So he asked, could it be that there were no great generals and it was only the inevitability of probability? He got no answer.
That just blew my fcking mind
I don’t fully agree with the logic. I saw where there was some kind of study done where they did an ELO rating like a chess based rating system that added or subtracted points based on the number of victories and loses. There were other factors to, but Napoleon blows everyone else away even when factoring in his loses in Russia and his last battles. He still had a lot more victories.
The same logic that you would apply to what you propose would mean that there would be no great chess players, go players, tennis players, ect. If there is a difference in skill and that skill is distributed along a bell curve or some other distribution then the result would not be 50 50 unless two equally rate competitors face each other.
I mean, he did just ask these guys for their opinions. None of them sat down and crunched the numbers on this. So I don't see where this really proves anything. It's a nice story, though.
Cool story bruh.......but things are never equal & great generals may 'even' the odds
There are 2 possibilities on the Fermi paradox both involving the great filter:
1) The filter is before us and one day we will meet our end. 2) The filter is behind us and we are simply the first to get past it.
Or that there is no singular filter and that the filter is actually a aggregate of stressors and limitors that stagnate a species till the species can not overcome them, population crashes, and the species is unable to recover.
there's also just, the fermi paradox is based on a LOT of assumptions, none of which in any way guarantee life to be nearby, and space is fucking huge - even if there was a spacefaring civilization say, 1000 light years away, that was able to travel at .01C, 1% the speed of light, they'd take 100 thousand years to get here, so why would they bother - and that's assuming they even noticed us in the first place, from 1000 lightyears away...
Pretty sure that humans are just being super stupid for broadcasting our existence to smarter and better civilizations. It's just logical that the bigger and better ones try to take control of the weaker ones.
There is another possibility. There is no great filter. We are simply the first, eldest of many that would appear. The universe seems to be 14 ish or whatever the latest estimate billion years old. But, it will last trillions. Very unlikely we would be so early unless we had to be to exist at all. In that we (or any eldest species in a universe) may never allow those that would otherwise come later to do so. Perhaps we are to become the intergalactic mega predator that will ensure no younger race will ever join us. We may be destined to become the great filter for all that would follow.
Then even if intelligent life is nearby, they may be respecting the dark forest.
The universe is Mental.
When you sleep, you can create (when you dream) - nothing TRULY exists in an absolute sense - but to the characters in the dream, objects DO exist in a relative way. If the dream character one hits dream character two on the head with a rock - the character may be injured in a relative sense - but in an absolute sense, the dream characters never really eisted - and neither did the rock. It was nothing more than a mental creation / illusion / thought process.
If you can lucid dream - you can allow (or make) your characters, have dreams themselves and then you can observe (at its simplest, listen to them talk about the dream that they have had) what they dream. That's hard to explain, but if you can lucid dream, try this - it's a lot of fun and a little strange.
is it possible - that we too - are simply a fantastically complex mental creation. And if so, then perhaps there is no limit to the number of universes - and we may even have "one each" - where we are indeed the centre of our own virtual universe.
We can't disprove if we are in a simulation.. I want a reboot.
Maybe 2 if you have two legs . As a song goes sometimes a fantasy is all you need .
What if - we cant find intelligent life in the universe because the distance is showing us past. Imagine sitting on a planet a few hundred Light years away from Earth and looking at Earth - what would you see? If you are only 200 light years away, you would see Earth in the year 1823 - would you be able to detect intelligent life on Earth? If you are on a planet 1000 light years away and looking at earth, even if you had better telescopes than we have now, you would simple not be able to detect life on earth.
Therefore - i say there is life out there - the problem we have is that we are not able to see the present and dumb as we are, we do what we always do - we look in to the past and understand nothing.
Even if you have better telescopes you can never see faster than light. That's just what we see. And because everything moves away from us expect Andromeda we see so little. But the space that we see is very big fortunately.
Exactly! Hence, Make Astronomy Great Again!
I think the physical representation of infinity could be a paradox itself. There are scientific explanations as to how infinity works, but I think that that is just the easiest solution we could come up with to a idea that we cannot truly, fully comprehend, simply due to the fact that we are finite as human beings.
So consider this simple phenomenon regarding simple intergers. You know, whole numbers. There is an infinite number of integers, right. The infinite number of the set of whole numbers. (1,2,3,...)
Okay, now consider only the set of even whole numbers as opposed to odd and even ones. (2,4,6,...) This second set is also infinite. However, this infinity is only one half the size of the first infinite set of numbers. So one infinity is twice as big as another infinity. Got it? No paradoxes you say?
@@joemendiuk There's no paradox as both are infinite... and infinite has infinite size. Good thought experiment on infinity, though.
@@ddduxThat thought experiment has been around years. Next someone is going to comment with the TREE(3) experiment lol
If most aliens have large, dark eyes, that means they’re from a planet with very little or no light. So why would you be looking for a planet that has a sun star or red star? 🤷🏻♀️
Good question.
Umm that’s just our version of alien life, that doesn’t mean aliens actually have big dark eyes, that’s just hollywoods interpretation
We are limited by what we think imagine and know. Other forms don’t have to have flying saucers and eyes legs and brain . It would be something human brain can’t comprehend and logic is useless there . If there are more colors but we can’t see them. How can you imagine it ?
23.20 - would it not be more sensible to build the shell contrary to the plane of the planets orbit, rather than on the same plane which would block out all natural sunlight.?
RE: The Grandfather paradox, turns out Grandma wasn't quite the doting wife after all!
Why can't people realize that time is nothing more than a concept, learning from memories and planning ahead is all time is, that is it's all in your head and everything is happening right now throughout the universe.
Fun fact is also that the Drake Equation is a back of the envelope something that Frank Drake wrote as a conversation starter when he realised he has nothing to present.
That equation in it self means nothing and explains nothing other that hopes and wishes of those who put numbers in it as most of these numbers are just figures without basis in science.
The pics coming back from the new telescope look mint. Can't wait to see what it finds
Thank God your mind doesn't need to understand the universe for it to exist. I don't worry you have to understand anything for it to exist. Your understanding controls nothing. The mind speculates, reality is a state of being, it exists, it simply is (that which it should be). Reality is independent of people's thoughts.
If there are other lifeforms in the universe the base requirements would be plants in the goldilocks zone but that's only because we exist in these conditions, yet this doesn't mean life can only exist in our conditions. We've discovered fish in Antarctica that survive using an antifreeze type protein to keep from freezing, aquatic worms have been found living in thermal vents both species survive on methane and in extreme conditions. Just consider what our planet had to go through for us to get to where we are, I think it was something like 5 past extinction events with dinosaurs being the latest one that made our being here possible. I think if aliens do exist, they'll be like nothing we've imagined before and we'll find them on a planet extremely different from our own.
I also can't help thinking, what if the only reason no other lifeforms have contacted us is because we're the first and only ones crazy enough to start screaming "hello, anyone out there" before we've even been able to establish travel between our closet planetary neighbors.
Amazing content. Thank you for this video.
The most obvious explanation for the double slit experiment paradox (observer paradox) is that we actually are influencing the photon through our act of observation, but we do not currently understand how we are interacting with it. Just as we once had no clue about radiation and yet could die of radiation poisoning by being near something radioactive long enough, we could be interacting with the photons in some way we are failing to perceive, but nevertheless are, that causes it to react as it does.
Have you ever tried mushrooms?
Despite the "observer effect" in the double-slit experiment being caused by the presence of an electronic detector, the experiment's results have been interpreted by some to suggest that a conscious mind can directly affect reality.[3] However, the need for the "observer" to be conscious (versus merely existent, as in a unicellular microorganism) is not supported by scientific research, and has been pointed out as a misconception rooted in a poor understanding of the quantum wave function ψ and the quantum measurement process. - Wikipedia
@@NardoAndRonie I didn't know they'd figured out the results were due to an electronic detector, but yes, that makes sense. Very reasonable cause for the effect they observed rather than resorting to paradoxes as the explanation.
Some truth in what you mentioned xylene. If an electron is a wave until you observe it, then it becomes a particle. So a electron is a wave of energy! So what is a thought? or emotion? Both are electron exchange in the brain, so could say thoughts are waves of energy we cant visually detect.
my grandfather tested leaks
We have not discovered all the different lifeforms on Earth. In our Jungles and under the Oceans, we have yet to completely identify and understand all life. If an Alien arrived on Earth and picked up a unique fish or frog species and asked what is this? If our answer was i do not know, he would realized we are not yet ready for their contact.
40:39 I truly believe it merely is a matter of being willing and a little bit of training one's brain to see in a new Way. Like those static pictures where one must gaze at them from a certain distance, in a certain state of mind.
"From time to time when discussing the subject of paradoxes, there are real advantages to knowing the truth about rubber duckies presented as the solution to all problems. A more concise synopsis is difficult to imagine that will better adjust your spine to help soothe your body aches and allowing reality to operate for a change. This is absolutely critical to changing the paradigm about Slab City. Multibeaming structures with sensing compositors amplify the quantum state of convergent evolution with sail towers of interpretation word salad produced by the degassing of basaltic lava. I have been living without these all my life and now I'm starting to question how I've survived. Life is hard and it’s harder when you’re stupid. I'm so glad that there are electrons with rear channel speakers. It explains things in a way that is stunning and brave. However, contrary to popular assumption, windsurfing talk radio can't replace spicy kimchi-flavored ramen during a session of chiropractic care. And that's because I follow the science of cosmic dog fur with micro-optic warp polarity. It's basic common sense in Slab City."
---Albert Einstein
Yes, I agree.
I think you'll find it was Johann Strauss and his triangular piano wot dunnit.
So we technically look into the pst right? So we could see a planet light years away with no life form but that doesn’t mean there’s no life on it right now?
Not really. It's no longer in that place and quantum says if you can't see it, it isn't there in much the same way as a wave is a particle if you're looking at it but if you're not, you don't know what it is or which. Do you want to buy a job lot of Paracetamol?
@@socialmeaslesinpartnership1252 It doesn’t matter where it is dude, the lifeless planet could become a planet with life and it has nothing to do with where it’s moving. Everything in the universe is moving relative to something else. So we don’t exist because we are moving through the universe? What you are saying isn’t logical. If you are trying to use Schrödinger’s thought experiment here, then you can’t come to a conclusion about whether the lifeless planet now has life.
Also Quantum Mechanics is for understanding the physics of subatomic particles. The only places it is used in macroscopic scales is in some cases for understanding objects like black holes, the early universe and the evolution of stars.
@@socialmeaslesinpartnership1252 Educate yourself before trying to lead others astray.
@@oidbio2565 Yes.................but..........err....what is TIME? Is Michio Kaku an idiot or does he need the money?
@@socialmeaslesinpartnership1252 Time is a measurement that depends on the Observer. That’s why they call it “relative”. And we’ve used it for so long as though it wasn’t relative because it was helpful.
The bottom line - the visitors don't need our permission to do anything - we are a biological curiosity to be observed .
Sirius B is a Red Dwarf Star! It is part of our "Local Group". According to the Dogon tribe of Africa, its 3rd planet is inhabited by a Race of beings known as the NoMo. They say that they are "Aquatic" beings which mean that Sirius B-3 contains liquid water. It also means that they could have an "Outpost" here in any one of our bodies of water.
The photon experiment where observing the photons changes how they act would explain time dilation in regards to the speed of light.
How?
@@joesands8860 light always appears to move at the same speed even when it doesn’t make sense. Just like observing the light particles here change how they act doesn’t make sense. If it changes by being observed it’s clearly operates on a high dimension than we can observe, and we are only seeing part of the true picture.
The Universe could well rotate, everything in it does.
We just assume it doesn't because there is no reference outside it to measure.
It always baffles me that all these folks assume that if there is life out there besides us, and honestly I believe there is based on simple probability, that they either A) know we exist B) care enough to bother with us or C) if the first two are true, that they would have the ability to travel here fast enough to make the journey worth the cost. Frankly, I'm a proponent of the idea that they don't know about us and aren't advanced enough to reach us even if they did.
Have you not heard all the government officials coming clean lol. Aka whistle blowers
Maybe aliens don’t want to interfere with humans because of the past history or it could also be that they wish for us to find are own way of advancing to the stars and galaxies because if you think about it they would have all the answers that we don’t yet understand and it could inhibit are potential for new possibilities!
This is a philosophical point of view in my eyes
Well, at the moment I'd guess our chances for any alien to be friendly and the contact would help us getting our act together is way better than our chances for not destroying ourselves.
well you can forget friendly anyway biden just put 2 sidewinders into 2 ufos and one is buried under a metre of snow in alaska , lets just say the mothership will be pissed
Someone would still find a way to be racist
True. It works this way (according to the Drake "thing" - which is probability, the wrong maths for estimating life elsewhere but..never mind that now).
Space civilisations are classed as 1, 2 and 3 depending on the technological mastery of energy. 1 is interplanetary within a solar system, 3 is intergalactic or...something like that. Humanity is estimated to be at 0.7, expected to become "1" in the next hundred years or so. If..............we don't blow ourselves to smithereens first. Let's look.............what are the chances?
Man is a very young species. Crocodiles, whales, mosquitoes, horses....just about everything is much, much older than Man. The dinosaurs ruled for many millions of years and it took an extinction event to get rid of them.
This tells us that our hands, opposing thumb, intellect and all that is typical of Man isn't any guarantee that he will be a success. It doesn't mean that Man will ever become the oldest species on Earth.
The FERMI paradox....where is everybody? Why is space not full of radio that we can understand as intelligent in our terms? It's because there's nobody there. Nature doesn't favour our intelligence, it favours dinosaurs that don't do superfluous things like space travel, philosophy, the arts, sitting in cafes etc. It favours any species that, if it isn't ripping something to bits, is running away from something intent on ripping it to bits. That's all nature wants it to do to satisfy replacing itself - the only thing nature wants life to do and the only natural measure of a successful species - not the conquest of space or the solving of paradoxes.
Space is empty because the evidence is that any species evolving like Man but elsewhere will create his own extinction event and there are no "Class 1, 2 and 3" civilisations anywhere. Nature doesn't like them. See?
I think if they have an idea of humans , it might be to come armed. We have wars, bombs that could ruin our own , entire, civilization . Why wouldn’t they feel threatened? I just hope all intentions and actions go well
@@taracummins2368 Ant colonies go to war with other ant colonies and wipe them out all the time. Are we concerned about ants?
Simulation? The problem I have with this is our theorising is anthropomorphic by default - we're considering alternatives we understand from our own culture. This is true about the existence of alien civilisations too, we assume a great deal, and the Drake Equation is of no use whatsoever because it all it does is generate a number based on assumed probability and doesn't consider all the factors that allowed civilisation to ponder such calculations - ooops, there I go, anthropomorphism....
So the Hawking Radiation isn’t everything getting spat out? Some stuff gets eaten and only a portion escapes, right? Hawking Radiation isn’t everything slowly (well, quickly) being puked, am I right?
Couple of rambling thoughts
If you have a simulated universe, which side of the mirror are you on?
If energy cannot be created or destroyed, what about the laws of Thermodynamics and entropy?
I couldn't even sleep last night till I could make sense of a few things that happened recently.. like whether or not they actually "sent a particle back in time" and soon after that they have "discovered a black hole leaving behind stars in its path" like as if the black hole was programed in reverse... so I tried to make sense of all that in my head, "wondering if these two occurances are connected." And then determining like "what are the odds of this happening the universe is so big." So these particles are in atoms and some say that maybe our universe is an atom.. "what type of atom represents our universe and how would we know, what are the odds?" And "does a different type of atom represent a different type of universe?" These thoughts and stuff "makes me believe that space and time is never ending." but now if that's not the case, and if its the universe thats never ending its still possible that some black holes may just be a different type than others and act different so they let energy escape differently than others and "they need to be studied more", so my question there would be, "are black holes born the same size and density?.. like if one is born completely different than the other as far as size and density, what would it mean if we created one you know?" I'm sure I found out mankind created one last time i checked. "Will it ever be the heart of a new galaxy? WILL WE LEARN TO CONTROL IT IF WE HAD TO.." dangerous as it is. Things either go forward or backward in time if possible. "Mankind has no idea what he's messing with especially when it comes down to destroying the atoms, because it's obvious, look man the history Channel has talked about "THE FLYING SAUCER THAT DEFUSED A NUCLEAR WARHEAD/FIELD TEST." why are aliens tied into nuclear warfare now. We are so close to nuclear warfare. "A so called time traveler warned about aliens invading some point this year.." if all that's true, aliens will strike/FROM THE DEPTHS OF THE EARTH/invade just as soon as a nuclear war happens, and their enemies will be all humans with a loaded weapon in the battle.. ain't that a lesson for mankind - "its how we learn to survive." If our universe is represented as a type of atom then there is more than 2 of our universe, also more than 2 of all the other universes represented by different types of atoms leading me to believe space and time and MATTER is never ending. "So imagine zooming out to infinity and then being able to zoom into matter till infinity, it's a never ending/infinite loop."
I'm not a scientist, I'm not mister know it all or anything, I lack knowledge. For right now in our time all that will ever happen till forever is fighting for the survival of mankind. The end of it all for an individual is death after that only God knows, because "God is everything." plants let alone live, thrive and survive through alot of this. Who really knows if they are different than us or not. Plants do things we all can't even imagine to certain people. Some said they have "seen or been through a loop where falling into a black hole ends reincarnation/life after death FOR EONS." being a part of the universe is unfathomable. We are the universe experiencing itself because we are a part of it. When we die we usually see things that go far beyond this world. like God, some family, we see our spirituality as a dimension, we see other dimensions, we see and dwell where we have died, after that we either keep seeing or rest there until we are experiencing being reincarnated and then again remaining a part of the universe that just so happens to "become a part of nature and thrive from something that died."
@Growseth Jones yes most definitely, humans are out there just like us, God knows what kind of life thrives with them. We evolved so fast that i suspect aliens could of created our timeline by using a method of colonizing with our unevolved ancestors, and so God had to make us because of what they did. They created a timeline that their ancestors had billions of years ago. Mankind is in between monkeys and extraterrestrials. Everything in the Bible, Jesus Christ, the hyroglifhics, it all happened in history. I do believe everything happened you know?
@Growseth Jones we are almost as advanced as they are we are closer than we think. They could be supplying earth's core with metal, these are all possibilities. When we look at Egypt and stuff we are looking at what it is they left behind before they civilized underground and they bow to their king
To answer your question on black holes. Yes they are all different, some are small some a massive some are super massive and a few are super duper massive black holes. The older the black hole the bigger it is , a bigger one can eat a smaller one and grow in size and density. The new one thay just discovered is a super super duper duper black hole 🕳. IT IS AS OLD AS THE UNIVERSE AND 100 BILLION TIMES BIGBER THEN THE BLACK HOLE AT THE CENTER OF THE MILKY WAY. . THATS BIG SO BIG I HAD TO WRITH IN ALL CAPS. 😂
@Ralph Anderson yes but if 2 were born at the same time and the one had a majority of different kind of matter, would they both be the same size?
We'd have to mine most planets in our milky-way that contains the necessary raw materials and I'm still doubtful its sufficient for constructing a colossal structure as big as the Dyson's Sphere.
Dead Space....
We have a George paradox in our house. We live with an invisible prankster gorilla called George. It’s where all the socks, scissors, pot holders and keys go. George is a naughty boy.
If I come down their and deafet George using kinetic energy how much are you willing to part with 🤔
This is the most amazing science video on UA-cam. I learned new concepts and it made me think about the universe in a different way.Thank you
13:30 I'm starting to understand reality this works exactly like expected...so basically nothing exists until we open our eyes we literally change reality because we choose to observe it
@@voodooranger1 that's why I don't believe in things such as "villain" or "hero"
The simulation theory is not 50/50
It's 49.5/49.5/1
I flipped a quarter & it landed on its side.
There could be something that we've never considered or have yet to comprehend.
Good point
If something tought me TES: Morrowind's school of Alteration (yes its from a videogame, but still a lesson) is that there's always more results than we think we can predict.
For example, you could flip the coin in the air, and your brother passing by could grab it mid-air and you have no longer the coin! Unpredictable but plausible! (requires a jerk brother, tho)
@@Oriol-oo7jl I feel like Morrowind did have infinite possibilities.. I made a spell where I could jump across the entire map but you had to perfectly time a different spell to be able to land without dying haha
I ran into a glitch & was able to soul trap a skeleton for like 4 hours straight to max out my conjuration & was able to do some crazy shit 😂
@@BiasFreeTV lol agreed. It was a super complex game (btw you can land on water also, its safe)
But i was refering more specific to a book inside the game called "Breathing water" IIRC, where a non-magic character "X" looks for a magician "Y" (i forgot the names) to teach him the spell Water Breath. When they meet "X" says:
-either you are "Y" and will teach me the spell, or you are not "Y"
And "Y" answers: "if you want to learn the ways of Alteration, you must learn that things can be always more than we thing. I could be "Y" and NOT teach you the spell, or i could not be "Y" and teach it too"
The story is longer, and im saying it by memory, but that sentence got me thinking for long, and im still remembering it nowadays.
And you talking about the flip coin binary result reminisced me of that
A lot of the stories found in in-game books were gems
I still play it from time to time, even more with the expansion mods the genious comunity had created. Highly recommend :)
Take care!
Thank you for this, I learned so much! ✴
At least we would know we're not alone
The self replicating machine part of the video reminded me of the Paperclip Maximizer thought experiment.
Many moment in our life, don’t we feel or see as if we’ve been here before. Sort of, in a split second in the same scenario. How could you explain that. Could it be in that instant your mind went into a time warp 😊😂🎉
I have often considers that as the solar system travels through Spacetime that there might be little pockets where it is warped ,which might help explain why we sometimes perceive glitches or anomalies like visions or ghosts or even pre-cognition ? Although if our brains are in fact processing on a quantum level this might also help explain such anomalies due to quantum entanglement perhaps?
Different dimensions. Being open allows one to interact and or sense the different dimensions that can interact with us. We exist. It’s real. But time is an illusion. Energy impacts the world by the vibrations it creates.
Or, it could be that there are so many planets with life, that more advanced civilizations simply haven't found us yet. Like looking into a cloud of plankton in the sea. There are so many, they simply can't see a single little bluish color plankton among the billions and billions of others that is us.
Ron, other intelligent life not finding us on our tiny little planet is not really the point. The point is we have never detected any type of signal or artifacts of other intelligent life elsewhere.
You would think with the supposed age of the universe there would be countless other intelligent life that have flooded the galaxy with radio waves, light waves and many other indications of non-natural artifacts throughout time, but we have seen absolutely none (zero).
Like Fermi asked "where is everybody"?
@@joesands8860 maybe it is the point. Because too many things are not accounted for in this, and virtually every other paradox ever presented. I.e. if a human type radio signal is emitted from 75 light years away, what is the window of time created to detect it? Hundred years? Two hundred? In terms of long range communication, radio waves are extremely inefficient. Quantum entanglement would be exponentially more efficient, instant over any distance and undetectable to our current censors. Then there's the issue of galatic and solar bodies absorbing them on their way towards us. At 75 lights years, the likelihood of thousands and thousands of these types of masses in the way to absorb them is essentially assured.
Perhaps in our assessments of ourselves, we've failed to see we're far more primative than we like to think.
Either way, there still isn't enough knowledge to know one way or the other.
@@joesands8860 er, 4000 "exo's?" in a universe with billions? in ONE galaxy of Dog????
@@joesands8860 I’m in semi agreement here. If there were super intelligent civilizations over the eons, we would have found something. A signature, relics, leftover crumbs. There is nothing. Just noble gases and non-molecular compounds. We are all there is. Let that sink in.
Could it be the listless particles in with the spin and being close to a large body like this then we come in some sort of a time flux superposition, so they appear to be at all places at the same time, Once being observed in the large world v then no longer in super position, but finds itsc permanent position
Not knowing if a cat in a box is alive or dead, doesn’t make the cat alive and dead. It still is a cat in a box with possibilities
I think life is common in the universe, but intelligent life may be very rare... Even here on Earth, if the dinosaurs never got wiped out (RIP), we more than likely would not be here either. More rare than the environments for life are the chances of the same natural events taking place at the right time to influence similar evolutions in the same manners.
Hooray! A sensible comment from a fellow fan of the dinosaurs!
We will be wiped out again...our technology is based off the past..oue reset started in the 15 the century..the aliens told me
First, modern day birds are considered to be the descendants of non-avian dinosaurs that managed to survive the extinction event, whatever it was, 65 million years ago. So dinosaurs are as alive today as whatever we are descendants of.
Second, intelligent life? Where? Here? On Earth? Us? Nah…intelligence is so rare among humans, I wouldn’t consider it a feature of the human race. It’s just that, when a large enough group of people is able to recognize the existence of an intelligent person, the repercussions can lead to advancements that benefit all humans…and THAT creates the appearance of intelligence amongst us all.
The general attitude among humans is to prune away any intelligence, killing them or, as done in China, brainwashing children to all think alike for the “greater advancement of society ” while taking actual research and development from other countries willing to give it in order to profit from cheap labor.
this is old jwt is up and running
That all depends on what time zone you are watching this video from. It's called the destiny paradox!
I don't know why when thinking about planets that could have life, the first thing that comes to mind is water. Has the possibility come to anybody's mind, that other forms of life might need nuclear radiation running through their veins to survive... And infact could be allergic to water all together??
I'm still of the belief that there's WAY more land than what we're told. Things so many of us see could come from those places.
At this point, all the scientific evidence points to the theory that we are alone in the Universe.
Doesn't mean a thing.
Good, I really hope we're alone;
'Life', evolution, does seem to be intrinsically competitive .... but then, I'm sure if we had next door neighbours, they'd be real friendly. ?!
If you could put every galaxy in a time frame and it's habitable planets in the same time . I think is possible that any galaxy's far ahead of us in their own time zones with further evolution could be traveling back and forth through the universe passing by all the galaxy's only stopping by the one's closer in time to themselves and leaving the early less developed galaxy's for later investigation. Maybe we aren't evolved or safe enough for them to visit because of some bad pit stops to galaxy's planets with creatures in our time zone 🙄
As for the fermi paradox, well not abiding by the prine directive to a type 0 civilization is ridiculous and dangerous, they have to break the warp barrier first or make contact with another in a similar state of technology, the federation of planets could already be out there waiting on us to catch up first
I could be wrong, but I don't think the example relating to Shakespeare in the Bootstrap Paradox is really a paradox as it seems more like a fictional story to me. If you did go back in time and give Shakespeare a copy of one his own plays before he wrote it would he actually copy it, or would he prefer to put his own spin on it? If historians are right about the man's creativity wouldn't Shakespeare be more likely to want to make the play into something more of his own, and then we'd end up with another version of the play, and each time we went back in time and gave the play to Shakespeare we'd get another, and another version. This answers the question as we can still say Shakespeare wrote the play, based on one he read. This is just me fictionalising so I don't think it's a paradox either, but it makes more sense to me, because if you go back and tamper with time you alter it and so you get different outcomes...or am I totally missing the point? I guess you have to just accept the fictional scenario to create the paradox in this case but it doesn't seem logical to me. Anyone got any thoughts?
Observers paradox doesn't have to do with observing. The photon pattern doesn't change because someone looked at it, it changes because we try to measure the results and it interferes with the photons. Not really a paradox, but if it was, it's a measurement interference paradox.
How do we even know that its different when we dont measure it, if we dont measure it.
@@mehmetariftasl8277 it's the double slit experiment if you want to look I to it. It's usually shooting photons through a wall with two slits. It leaves a wave pattern on the wall, but if they put a measuring device to see what slit the photon went through, the wave pattern collapses into two lines. So the observation (measurement) changes the photons from acting like a wave, to acting like a particle.
Wow! You are so wrong. Observing has EVERYTHING to do with paradoxes. I guess you don’t know about the Schrödinger thought experiment: The cat is both dead and alive in a closed box before observation (by opening the box). And regarding photons? They are waves when observed one way and particles when observed another way. There ARE NO INTRINSIC PARADOXES that exist without us making observations. Educate yourself before you try to lead others astray.
" the human brain is the smartest on the planet".. id a prob agreed w ya 15 years ago; but now, not so much...
Which brain are you suggesting is smarter than humans ?
@@ukpukka4671 bacteria
I don't believe any paradox unless the Doctor has explained and overcome it! 🤘
@ Ryan Ellis Doctor Who?
@@chrisdaldy-rowe4978 don’t think he’s meaning any specific doctor lmao just saying a doctor
@@datblammeroo9845 yes m8 i understand. I was just having fun because i believed he was talking about Dr. Who lol
Oh, man…you’re dating yourself. No app needed.
Simply put, this was a very entertaining video!
*We use the most common element: Hydrogen to send and receive signals well look for signs in the universe when if you think about it we should be looking for something that’s not the most common so it’s more distinct I think we are looking at it wrong and time will tell that it was a mistake to do so!*
I would travel back in time only one hour. With lotto jackpot numbers. So there's no wierd paradoxes.
So you want to go back in time to a time that's already played out. So when you do go back in time to that place it is the same place, but it's not the same place because it's at a different place time than your original timeline so that makes it a different universe
Yep!... worse that can happen. I'll be stuck in a "ground hogs day" paradox. Where I wake up a winner everyday but never cash in because the next day is the date that I travel back in time... 🤷♂️
I figure with the Earth rotating and in orbit you would end up about 1000 miles away from where you started and 1000 miles above or inside the Earth
@Bob Slob No because if my time machine, in my case would be a "phone booth" time machine 🤘😎.... I would reappear in exact same spot. But one hour earlier.
@@sipoppy984 Bill an ted had it right!
To get through a wormhole you need a proctologist.
I agree completely, half of these "paradoxes" can be revealed as BS by thinking them through critically instead of just thoughtlessly accepting the suggestion of "woo woo" .
It’s always a matter of time until things just get silly.
Yes! We are in a simulation!
Make it stop plz
Not only do I love your content, but also the narator's voice! It's so professional, claming, yet interesting to listen to! Hats off to him and props to you for finding such a genuis narrator!
The only thing that keeps them up at night is adderall and maybe a midnight release of an iPhone 😂
I ended up watching this whole video lol it has alot of interesting stuff in it that is if you are interested in this kind if stuff and I am very interested in it.. great video thanks for the upload..
I thought this was going to be a video about paradoxes, not a review of idiotic science theories.
been to this channel before?
I'm always amazed at myself when I realize that once again I've been drawn into a teaching of imaginary theories, presented to be very deep discoveries of truth, when in reality they are a complete waste of time listening to pure dribble.
A bit ironic these paradoxes keep scientists up at night but they help me sleep at night.
One other thing not mentioned is size, we are tiny, some stars are 1000 times bigger, 1000000 times bigger. Imagine a being from a planet in that star system went passed in a ship a million times bigger than ours, we would be a bug on the windshield or the gravitational impact of a drive by would destroy us.
I can imagine the amusement (if they emote) the builders feel when seeing our confusion.
34:51 I like to think that War, is noisy. We have peace, which is why the sky appears quiet. Would you prefer it to he other Way? Just to find out?
Fast radio bursts could be only way to send messages without decay in space
But deciifer yet
Like encryption
I think static or binary
Energy could be taken from space to power ships
I already solved the light through the 2 slits. What’s happening is you are observing both the upside down light and right side up light at the same time your brain separates the light to make them both viewable at the same time. In other words in physical reality there are only 2 lines which has been proven already. Look at the lights with one eye closed and you still see more than 2 lines because both eyes process light the same way. Upside down turning objects right side up in your brain. This is hard for me to explains but instinctively I know it’s correct.
Interesting