ERIC BISCHOFF'S 83 Weeks | Bret Hart in WCW |

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 30 вер 2024
  • Eric Bischoff and Conrad Thompson run through the incredible true story of bringing Bret "The Hitman" Hart to the WCW during the peak of the Monday Night Wars.
    Since 1984 every wrestling promoter has tried to best Vince McMahon and the World Wrestling Federation unsuccessfully… except one, Eric Bischoff. Eric beat Vince McMahon’s Monday Night RAW head-to-head in Monday Night Wars 83 consecutive times. 83 Weeks will take a deep dive into the highs and lows of Eric Bischoff’s unparalleled successes in the wrestling business.
    SUBSCRIBE TO 83 WEEKS: / @83weeks

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,9 тис.

  • @EGarrett01
    @EGarrett01 3 роки тому +64

    Eric's theme here is that Bret didn't care so he didn't book him with much. He also said Sting didn't care so he didn't follow through on Sting's angle. Additional Info: Bobby Heenan (who was brilliant) went to Eric once with a great opening for Nitro and Eric ignored him so much that Bobby said he never bothered again. Tony Schiavone said he would literally put his head down on the desk between segments. Maybe WCW was just a terrible place to be for anyone but Eric Bischoff, Hulk Hogan and their immediate buddies, and that's why no one seemed to care.

    • @mjbeezer
      @mjbeezer Рік тому +4

      Well said.

    • @jtcindahaus
      @jtcindahaus Рік тому +3

      you nailed it. which is why i didnt listen to this. he's full of himself, just like Hogan

    • @fredpamalexander6406
      @fredpamalexander6406 Рік тому +2

      The fact someone hasn't cleaned Eric Bischoff's clock is just beyond belief.

    • @EGarrett01
      @EGarrett01 Рік тому +1

      @@fredpamalexander6406Ric Flair punched him directly in the face when he showed up in the WWE locker room.

    • @dpdip
      @dpdip 9 місяців тому

      1:05:00 - 1:05:20

  • @charlest5604
    @charlest5604 5 років тому +259

    Vince was right, WCW wouldn't know what to do with a Bret Hart

    • @TheWazperviz
      @TheWazperviz 5 років тому +15

      Vince McMahon said that and how true it was. Sad really

    • @ferox965
      @ferox965 5 років тому +16

      Insanely true. They really blew it with Hart.

    • @blueblur2273
      @blueblur2273 5 років тому +3

      If you think about it that's a statement that really denigrates Bret along with WCW.

    • @TFitz1
      @TFitz1 4 роки тому +2

      I wonder how much of it is that and how much of it is they were too arrogant to care or put a lot of thought into it

    • @StuUngar
      @StuUngar 4 роки тому +9

      In all fairness, neither did Vince. I remember Vince saying in the Bret dvd that if he were WCW, he wouldve built the entire company around Bret.
      Yet in his conversations with Bret when Bret asked what they had planned for him for the next few years, Vince told him he would be putting over Shawn Michaels, Steve Austin, and would then be used to help elevate other performers.
      I don’t believe Vince is putting the spotlight on Bret on a roster with Hogan, Goldberg, and Sting.

  • @tommymclaughlin3203
    @tommymclaughlin3203 5 років тому +45

    Whether you agree if the Montreal thing was a work or a shoot, Bret meant a lot to Pro WRESTLING.

  • @DEVILxMAYxCRYx5
    @DEVILxMAYxCRYx5 3 роки тому +70

    Conrad: Eric is your last name Bischoff?
    Eric: maybe I don’t recall.
    Conrad: I have it right here on paper .
    Eric: may I ask how you got that ?

  • @Thex-W.I.T.C.H.-xMaster
    @Thex-W.I.T.C.H.-xMaster 3 роки тому +8

    Bishoff has major memory loss he needs help quickly 😢.... They brought Bret in to keep him under Hogan. They gave him 2.5 million to never use him they wasted millions in WCW go look up the horrible business decisions Bischoff made so to him what was another 2.5 million. Bischoff didn’t bring him back for Thunder 😂🤣😂🤣😂. That’s laughable they did nothing with Thunder.

  • @shockerrocker1
    @shockerrocker1 6 років тому +437

    "I don't recall" with Eric Bischoff and Conrad Thompson.

  • @mattthomas1442
    @mattthomas1442 6 років тому +109

    Bret Hart wasn't a draw is one of the biggest misnomers and false narratives in wrestling history. If your requirements to be a draw are drawing Hogan, Austin or The Rock numbers then no he wasn't a draw but in that case neither was anybody else. But if your requirement is actually bringing fans to the arena and moving the needle when you're there than Bret was a draw. Here's some numbers that come straight from historyofwwe and the observer.
    After Hogan dropped the title to Warrior at Mania 6 business slowly started dropping. Warrior couldn't put 10k in the Garden or draw 5K in hot markets like Detroit, Chicago or Philadelphia. When Bret became the guy he would routinely draw 15K in the Garden and 20K for PPVs and sell out Detroit, Chicago and Philly. The Bret vs. Owen feud was the biggest drawing program WWE had in "several years" according to Meltzer.
    Before that in 1992 WWE ran multiple loops, one house show look was headlined by the World CHampion Savage, the other by IC champion Bret. One would think the Heavyweight champion would draw much bigger crowds right? Wrong, routinely Bret would outdraw Savage despite working "b" towns and not having the Heavyweight belt on the card.
    Now lets look at PPV buyrates. Brets first real main event as champion was the RR93. That drew 40K more buys than the previous year. Then his first Mania as champ drew likewise drew 40K more. He gets moved down the card in favor of Lex Luger and what happens? Buy rates drop. The Summerslam 93 rate was lower than 92 which heavily involved Bret and Survivor Series 93 was 70K worse than 92 which again heavily involved Bret. So when Bret is at the top things are looking good, when he's not things go down. That is a draw.
    Onto 1994. Mania's buyrate is slightly down from the previous year but again Luger and Yoko are the ones getting most of the hype but of course Bret ends up winning the belt. Now that he is champion again guess what? Business picks up. Both Summerslam and Survivor Series are way up with him headlining vs. him being buried down the card the previous year.
    1995. He starts that off by headlining the Royal RUmble and of course buy rates go up vs. the previous year when he was down the card but come Mania he is pushed down the card again and guess what? Buyrates plummet from where they were the previous year as does Summerslam.
    1996. Him being in the championship at Royal Rumble leads to an increase in buyrates from the year before but Mania is down with him vs. Shawn. They stay down the rest of the year with him gone but once he comes back for a high profile match with Austin at Survivor Series they jump back up. No coincidence.
    1997. 1997 buyrates were all down until Summerslam where not coincidentally they jump up massively with Bret headlining compared to him not being there the year before. Survivor Series also jumps up with him headlining as well.
    Bottom line is that almost every PPV that focused heavily on Bret did way better than the years that didn't. If that happened once or twice I may say it is a coincidence but it happened time and time again. That means that you are a draw. His attendance numbers as headliner were solid compared to everybody else during that era. Bischoff admitted himself that they couldnt' give tickets away at that time but when Bret was champ he was drawing 5-10K while the Hogans, Flairs, Michaels and Savages of the world couldn't get nobody. Bret just had the misfortune of being in between Hogan and Austin, the two biggest draws of all time so compared to them he didn't seem like one.

    • @RomeoBarnes
      @RomeoBarnes 5 років тому +4

      He didn't say bret wasn't a draw, he said bret wasn't drawing at the time which is true. If bret was drawing Vince would've kept him.

    • @ky1870
      @ky1870 5 років тому +12

      Y doesn’t anyone ever knock Shawn Michaels for not being a draw? Feel like I only hear talks of Bret not being a draw but in the mid 90s Shawn Michaels was pushed more than Bret

    • @redhawk0329
      @redhawk0329 5 років тому +9

      That was probably one of Brets hottest years coming off of the fued with Austin. Couple that with now being part of the biggest and most talked about event in wrestling history., Bret was thebl hottest talent in wrestling and Bischoff blew it! Waited several weeks to put him on TV and in a match then he does it as a referee. Come on now.

    • @redhawk0329
      @redhawk0329 5 років тому +4

      @Andy Parker he was actually a bigger draw than Flair and probably Savage. Now I'm only 34 but I hear how Flair basically carried NWA in the 80s when it was on its back but I just didn't see it and never saw a great draw. NWA folded while he was on top there, WCW was nothing during his first run, he didn't make an impact when he went to WWF and WCW was spinning its wheels for years until the NWO started and once again, WCW folds with Flair still there. The wrestling business was down during most of Brets early years as champ and he was the primary reason it stayed afloat along with the kliq wrestlers and others. He was also a huge draw IN Europe, even more so than Austin or Hogan.

    • @redhawk0329
      @redhawk0329 5 років тому +3

      @Andy Parker I would beg to differ. I love Macho Man but he was never "The" Guy. Bret at least can say he was.

  • @scottlowe7343
    @scottlowe7343 6 років тому +59

    Bret was a 5x World Champion and should've been brought in immediately to be in that mix

    • @Buckdawg
      @Buckdawg 4 роки тому +5

      Yep. You dont put the belt FIVE TIMES on someone who "doesnt draw" lol. Especially back then when 5 times was A LOT.

    • @cherylhenson2945
      @cherylhenson2945 4 роки тому

      Bret should have pdirected his character more first and foremost and looked out for Davey boy , tag titles then u.s belt just to prove he's worthy and push Goldberg's title win back and Hart Hogan should have had a back and worth trade off with the belt

    • @darthbigred22
      @darthbigred22 2 роки тому

      @@Buckdawg I hope one day some idiot kid is arguing with you about Edge's solo run being bigger than his TLC tag team days so you can see how stupid you sound.
      Mick Foley held the title less than Bret and he was a New York Times best selling author at the height of his fame. Mankind is bigger than Bret Hart.
      If Bret was so amazing then frankly the fans would have just made his angle what was hot, it's what happened with SCSA. Heck the Rock was getting over as a face while he was a heel before the Deadly Game Survivor Series.
      Just go watch it on Peacock from late 95 until the Screwjob and you'll see WCW is not to blame, Bret was not some god who all the fans loved and adored. neither was HBK.
      It'd be like if TNA had gotten big and hired away CM Punk and Daniel Bryan in 2012, wrestling got hot and by that I mean even your grandparents are aware of it somewhat, and then Cena/RKO were ran out of town for new better talent. That's essentially what happened in 96-98.

  • @BAMBOOLOUNGE
    @BAMBOOLOUNGE 6 років тому +76

    Eric screwed Eric

  • @savagetilley2782
    @savagetilley2782 6 років тому +51

    Still loved WCW more than any other company. Outside of my dads old tapes of WCCW.

    • @SIXTHREEONEFOURTHREENIONEOOSEV
      @SIXTHREEONEFOURTHREENIONEOOSEV 5 років тому

      ;----)

    • @ronsantocubsfan
      @ronsantocubsfan 5 років тому +1

      Windy City championship wrestling?!

    • @danielbullock9006
      @danielbullock9006 5 років тому +1

      love the Von Erichs

    • @bigbaba1491
      @bigbaba1491 4 роки тому +3

      Me too....i think people who re-watch it from hindsight with all the revisionist history by wwe will never know how great it really was back then. It was incredible from 1996 to 1999 then went to shit very quick. Even the fact that not everything made perfect sense for a dirtsheet reader and internet user (only super nerds had internet back then) made wcw even better because it felt organic and spontaneuos not overscripted like WWF. WWF felt like a TV show, wcw felt like a sports broadcast

  • @PhinneusPrune
    @PhinneusPrune 5 років тому +60

    Brett Hart was one of the best pro wrestlers of all time. He made it look like wrestling was easy. The only other wrestler I can say that about is Curt Henig. They just flowed naturally in the ring.

    • @Kayfabe-226
      @Kayfabe-226 4 роки тому +1

      AGREED...Bret knew how to work properly...

    • @adamrutherford4083
      @adamrutherford4083 4 роки тому +1

      I agree in terms of American pro wrestling. Owen Hart may be one of the others also.

    • @jacksonhewitt7827
      @jacksonhewitt7827 4 роки тому +2

      Also Dean Malenko he didnt have the charisma asBret so he wasnt nearly as over but Dean was as far as in ring work top 10 Alltime!

    • @PhinneusPrune
      @PhinneusPrune 4 роки тому +2

      @@jacksonhewitt7827 Dean Malenko vs Eddie Guerrero matches were some of the best.
      I agree

    • @ClassicKrusty
      @ClassicKrusty 4 роки тому

      They had some real classics that are just old vaulted matches I stumbled upon on Daily Motion. Circa 89 Hart and Henning had some matches that were ahead of their time and much better than what WWE was putting on Saturday Night Main Event and PPVs back then

  • @Jatycre
    @Jatycre 6 років тому +328

    “Bret wasn’t a draw.”
    “I paid him over 2 million to be the top guy on Thunder.”
    Complete contradiction.

    • @Surgicalsensei
      @Surgicalsensei 6 років тому +50

      hindsight. he thought he was a draw, until he realized bret didnt draw anything for wcw

    • @Jatycre
      @Jatycre 6 років тому +44

      Darth There’s no way he would’ve offered that kind of money without seeing the numbers, and KNOWING Bret was a draw.
      He certainly wouldn’t have planned to make him the top guy on their new show.
      He just bent to the will of “Doesn’t work for me, brother.”

    • @manoshs5323
      @manoshs5323 6 років тому +32

      AND....then offer him a 2 year extension on his contract!

    • @josephfigg4848
      @josephfigg4848 6 років тому +16

      He wasn't a complete draw when compared with his contemporaries, although his name and lineage still had significance which could of potentially been a draw with the correct booking.

    • @Jatycre
      @Jatycre 6 років тому +31

      Darth Also, to your second point, no one can draw if they’re not pushed.
      Stone Cold wasn’t the top draw in the business until he got pushed to the top of the cards.
      Same for Rock, and even Hogan.
      Hogan drew peanuts in his first WWE run, being on the lower card (in his blue ring gear). Then he went to the AWA, got pushed, and a star was born. Came back to WWE, got pushed there, and drew insane numbers.
      Bisch just desperately wants to rewrite history so that he never screwed anything up. Unfortunately, it’s not true. For all the good he did, he also helped kill WCW by letting guys like Hogan essentially run the place, and change plans on a whim (exactly what Hogan did with Bret).

  • @walkaway3980
    @walkaway3980 6 років тому +363

    "Bret isn't a draw" but I'm still talking about him 20 years later..... To get a draw on my podcast...........

    • @redfield1007
      @redfield1007 6 років тому +32

      Lol nicely put.

    • @ogarstyle
      @ogarstyle 6 років тому +23

      Yeah but the fans vote for the topic beforehand

    • @redfield1007
      @redfield1007 6 років тому +9

      Always annoying when comments get deleted because somebody doesn't agree with your point of view.

    • @borednow5838
      @borednow5838 6 років тому +17

      I cracked up the bit when Conrad called Eric out on not thinking Bret was a draw and yet paid him $2million a year! I enjoyed this a lot, but I think mostly Bishchoff was exposed at being at fault for the dropping the ball with Bret at least when he was there. Bret may have been partly to blame too, but when you see what WCW came up with for him I think its clear who was most at fault. I'm intrigued by the ending of having Nitro (NWO) VS. Thunder (WCW). Did Eric say why that didn't happen?

    • @borednow5838
      @borednow5838 6 років тому +7

      Sure, but if you listen to these podcasts Eric hardly ever takes the blame for anything that happened on his watch. As he himself has said people all have their own take on things. So the defence Eric makes of himself is his. To be fair to Bret has as always said that Eric was good to him in WCW, like how he supported him after Owen's passing. His beef with Eric was more just to do with how clueless he was about wrestling (in Bret's opinion), and carried on mis-managing Bret and letting the politics run wild back stage.

  • @adrianhemmer6728
    @adrianhemmer6728 5 років тому +28

    Would’ve been a draw if you would’ve just had Bret vs Hogan. Hogan scared of Bret because he makes his wrestling look mediocre

    • @rockcatinc.4814
      @rockcatinc.4814 4 роки тому +8

      Hogan will still outdraw Bret any day if the week. Hogan always was cooler and a bigger draw that Hart

    • @dannyramirez8428
      @dannyramirez8428 4 роки тому +2

      RC DR3 EVERYONE wanted to see Brett Vs. Hogan. Except Hulk Hogan.

    • @Buckdawg
      @Buckdawg 4 роки тому +1

      You need top guys to put you over in order to be a top guy.. Hogan held so many potential top guys down. As much as he did for the business, he also fucked it over massively.

    • @badmaninc.536
      @badmaninc.536 3 роки тому

      See that statement about hogan being scared of Bret because Bret would make his wrestling look mediocre never really made sense to me. Not saying that your wrong for saying it as that may very well have been the case to Hogan’s mind.
      The reason it doesn’t make sense to me is that Bret could wrestle a paper bag and make that paper bag look like amazing (hyperbole and exaggeration on the example I freely admit) but Bret could go out there and have a fantastic match with anyone and walk out afterwards with both guys looking really good. Hogan should have jumped at the chance to work with Bret... that’s basically a Win/Win situation for both guys in my opinion and from your lead in it seems to also be yours as well.

    • @badmaninc.536
      @badmaninc.536 3 роки тому

      @ no question! Hogan was definitely the one with the higher name recognition of the two. Which is why a feud between the two could only have helped both of them.
      Hogan would have looked awesome because Bret could make anyone look awesome, and Bret would have benefited from working a feud with Hogan due to Hulk’s name recognition. And WCW would have made a ton of money off it... it would have been a no-lose scenario.
      Alas this is NOT what happened.

  • @blakemccormick9612
    @blakemccormick9612 6 років тому +35

    There's no way Bret Hart was lying THIS much.

    • @evilsWa
      @evilsWa 5 років тому

      BLAKE MCCORMICK ok. You know because you say so. It’s that kind of dismissive nature that gives people license to lie straight to your face all the fucking time… We’re talking about guys who literally lied about who they are as a character for their fucking career… We’re talking about a guy who is still in love with Kaybabe and probably has it tattooed on his dick…a guy who literally held the entire company hostage because of what might happen to his fucking character if he lost in his “hometown” which was actually 3500 km away from his actual hometown: But yeah Brett Hall didn’t lie that much.... sure.

    • @evilsWa
      @evilsWa 5 років тому +2

      Imagine if Stone Cold refuses a job simply because “I can’t lose in the United States I’m too big of a hero there.” Or god forbid HBK did that! But because it’s Brett Hart he can’t lose in a country almost as big as the United States. Fuck him.

    • @tiatrips
      @tiatrips 5 років тому

      @Justin Sharpe I believe Stone Cold said that he would have lost to Brock, just not in a qualifying match for King of the Ring. He didn't think that's where that match should have taken place. Bret found every reason to try to keep the belt because he didn't like Shawn Michaels/couldn't lose in Canada. Situation is a little different.

    • @e2go
      @e2go 3 роки тому

      No, but his representation that was working McMahon, Bischoff and Meltzer simultaneously in order to get huge money for their client was. All while working in just enough of the truth to make it believable. It's kind of what they do.

    • @blakemccormick9612
      @blakemccormick9612 3 роки тому

      @@e2go just seemed like EVERY SINGLE THING bret was reported as saying in this clip regarding WCW was denounced by Eric as an untruth. I just have a hard time believing that. Maybe some....but ALL of it? Don't seem plausible.

  • @supremeasiaticallah2303
    @supremeasiaticallah2303 5 років тому +86

    "WCW doesn't know what 2 do with a Bret Hart"
    Vince McMahon

    • @weworldwide1348
      @weworldwide1348 5 років тому +8

      obviously Vince didn't gaf bout Bret in 97 either

    • @aaronscott4984
      @aaronscott4984 5 років тому +7

      @@weworldwide1348
      He couldn't afford to pay Bret they signed a contract and it came out that Vince didn't have the money for the contract. Look shit up before spouting off

    • @jerry85g7
      @jerry85g7 5 років тому +4

      Boy was he right

    • @weworldwide1348
      @weworldwide1348 5 років тому +5

      @@aaronscott4984 u dumb, brody. If Vince had really wanted to keep him and Bret wanted to stay, they could've re-negotiated, which happens all the time.
      Obviously, that never happened. Vince clearly told him to go sign with WCW.

    • @blueblur2273
      @blueblur2273 5 років тому +4

      @@weworldwide1348 Yep with Austin blowing up he just didn't need Bret anymore. Plus when you watch Bret's Wrestling with Shadows documentary(along with people close to Bret and their recollection of him at the time) you see he just wouldn't have fit the attitude era.

  • @NoelComiX
    @NoelComiX 6 років тому +88

    This is not a bad episode but there are some huge missed questions here. Why was Bret not booked in matches with Hogan and Sting right off the bat? Why did Bret not say on Nitro he couldn't wrestle because he broke his hand punching Vince? Challenges about how to fit Bret into a crowded roster? Where was his title run in 1998? What about a WCW branded Thunder headed by Bret? Eric's thoughts on nWo 2000? These topics are not seriously discussed with the same fervor as the topics in the finger poke of doom episode.

    • @morganleggett2003
      @morganleggett2003 6 років тому +2

      Noel ComiX Eric wasnt there for the title or NWO run

    • @NoelComiX
      @NoelComiX 6 років тому +1

      Morgan Leggett right, but they should still discuss it.

    • @msuli80
      @msuli80 6 років тому +4

      Noel ComiX they did it deliberately to create the illusion that WCW had a greater depth of talent than WWF, that Bret wasn’t worthy of headlining Nitro

    • @surgeoforange3107
      @surgeoforange3107 6 років тому +3

      Where do i begin? What a load of shit!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I bet ppl believe eric's dream. Eric, you remember all these meetings but forget how much you paid Bret hart? hahahaha. Ok then! Eric, Bret wasnt a draw, yet you paid him TOP DOLLAR cash! You mentioned him with Hogan, savage, flair (BTW flair couldnt draw for shit. he was all southern draw. Nobody in Canada gave a shit, nor did anyone over sea's, or most of america. sorry but that's fact) in same sentence. You're all over map on this one.
      Hogan came to WWF in 1993, so was flair and in 1992 when they where on top, DIDNT DRAW! As Bruce Prichard said, nobody cared to be quiet frank. WHATS THAT ABOUT DRAWING POWER? They where already on way down in all kinds of numbers, WWF and wrestling that is because of steroid scandal. In 1993, Hogan couldn't pick up viewing numbers or house show numbers or ppv buys as CHAMP, you know the #1 guy! Fact was, he was behind Bret in popularity at that time. Bret was most IMPACT and profitable wrestler in ALL of north america at this time.
      So Bret wasn't a star, yet...every1 knew his name, was all over tv's, media. Had a #1 song about him in Germany, top Canadian, wwf biggest draw outside of america, won everything in wwf, made MILLION's and was handed #1 heel in 1997 a long with most popular wrestler in wwf 3 outta 6 years he was champ. Yet, can't draw, not a star power? WTF is eric talking about???? Buddy, you dont like Bret, thats fine but at least be HONEST and real in your podcast. You are contradicting yourself, dumbass. Listen, if Bret wasnt that big... he wouldnt be able to get no where near that cash and his name wouldnt be top 5 of all time in his ERA. Oh is Bret going to have fun with this one...
      Oh now HINDSIGHT he was signed for WCW Thunder. Anybody who knows and was close to wrestling and Bret... knows youre flat out, FULL OF SHIT esp on this one! Dont even try and pretend, now, that's why u picked Bret Hart! Maybe the ppl who dont know the in details, but you aint fooling the one's who know!
      Draw power? Bret was biggest star outside of America in his era, ask Vince or JR who have publicly said this how many times? Oh wait they're lying, lets listen to Eric B who cant even get his facts straight. BTW, the tickets bought and merch are TRUE indicators. Austin, Rock, Hogan, Cena are all bigger then Bret in America, but he's legit top 5! Who the hell saved WWF in days of fans leaving? Bret Hart. Who woulda been that champion and guy who could take wwf outta dark days in usa and go everywhere else and make money? Hogan and flair couldnt draw in those days in WWF and WCW where they wrestled in empty chairs and wwf still wrestled in full arena's for PPV and packed whatever taping event they had whichever size. Dont get it twisted that Hogan was drawing huge in WCW. Its a roster that draws... bookers, why do u think he couldnt draw in 1992-1993 in wwf when he came back? IN LATE 96 nwo was a cool faction, new look in wrestling...perfect take credit! But notice in cpl years that ended faaaaaaaaaaaast? But I thought Hogan drew? why did WCW sink? why did they lose to WWF in ratings all of a sudden, but they had biggest star ever hogan? Becuz its not one guy team, he needs bookers and great talent around him. Oh and dont go after Bret on wcw sink, you didnt let him wrestle anyone big or start a rivalry or push him to #1 to even say he couldnt draw in those days! So its just like austin and rock in wwf they had great roster backing em up but eventually in 2002 numbers started slipping and by 2004 it went right down. Not because rock and austin are not stars or cant draw.. it just became stale entertainment and nothing new to look forward too. Like any league you got stars but you def need talent around to make it fun and exciting with rivalry. Bret wrestled in era's with Bashiton booger, al montoya, eric bradford, sparky plug, skip, dean douglas, whalem murssy etc... Bret cant wrestle himself, he needs another top dog to start rivalry with. Imagine if he was pushed with savage, flair, hogan, warrior, jake snake, ric rude, mr perfect etc... he coulda been huge too wrestling great talent makes you big. Bret did it on his own because that was his only shot, vince seen that outta him! Hogan knew, dont wrestle bret or he'll be booed outta park, he wasnt the man after 1992. Thats fact, jack! No one can deny it. Hogan coulda helped wwf and helped push Bret to newer heights.. but meh he wanted yokozuna, that worked out well, that drew huuuuge lol!!!
      Bret WAS a star, made million's... had legion of fans everywhere. #1 selling book, top canadian, top selling WWE dvd. Lead wwf 4 different years in merch sales. Shawn loves to brag about his 1996 merch lead, mean while Bret was out for 6 months, fuck i hope you made most shawn!!! and when wrestling went to Canada he was THE biggest thing. Not even Austin, Hogan or rock and Goldberg could get over VS Bret Hart...neither in UK, Germany or south Africa etc... and you cant fight it because youtube or GOOGLE is your fucking friend in case you "forget" as u like to say in this podcast.
      You didnt let Bret Hart vs Hogan happen but once on a silly b.s. match that ended up them being "friends" you coulda had a rivalry, started a feud made/tried for millions off a match Hogan bulked at in WWF years earlier, which he prolly did again in WCW, thats why we didnt see it. But u let Hogan run ur show in WCW and u got what u deserved. Bankrupt!!! BTW since Hogan is draw by himself, what happened to wcw...while he was top guy? Why did u sink? exactly! Wow is this complete fucking joke of a podcast by you. Conrad is cool. BTW, wtf was Bret Hart in WCW anyways? Good, bad, good, bad, mid card, heavy weight champ, us champ, referee, HUH???????? Yeah thats YOUR mind set! Your ego is upset because Bret has said numerous times, youre full of shit and back stabbing POS. This podcast proves all lies you make up. I love when you pretend to tell us what u think now... Best Line. Bret Hart wasn't a draw...but i paid him top dollar just under Hogan. Thats an idiot, folks.
      Ill leave it as.. if Bret wasnt a big star, why are we talking about him? why does his name sell? why does have he have millions of followers? We are talking about him right now, because...HE WAS A FUCKING STAR! Not a Konan....

    • @StuUngar
      @StuUngar 6 років тому +6

      I can answer some of those, even though I’m not Bischoff.
      Why was Bret not booked immediately with Hogan and Sting? Because he came in right before Sting vs Hogan which had been building since Bash at the Beach 96 and was the biggest thing in wrestling despite what the revisionist history that the WWE would have you believe. Sting and Hogan had 2 more matches that lasted into the spring. I argue that while 2 more matches was sufficient, the feud could’ve stretched out a little further, especially had the match at Starrcade gone the way it shouldve. Then outta nowhere Bill Goldberg became white hot. I’ve always thought it was ridiculous that Bret has always basically contended that WCW should drop everything they were doing and put everything on hold just to give Bret the feud he wanted. Also important to note that Bret did not come in as “the hottest thing in wrestling” like so many people contend. In 1997, the internet was in something like one out of every 5 households, and those homes tended to be higher income homes who did not watch wrestling. The majority of fans had no idea what had even happened at Survivor Series....and for the ones that did, why would they have all this sympathy for Bret after he dogged the shit out of them for the better part of 97?
      I distinctly remember Bret getting booed in his early WCW interviews and several “USA!” chants. It was so bad that I remember Bret interrupting the boos and chants to say that he didn’t want to disrespect America. So his switch from vicious anti-American heel to babyface was “I mean no disrespect to Americans??”
      Quite the babyface turn.....
      Bret’s hand? Vince said in his infamous Bret screwed Bret interview that he was keeping legal options open. Last thing you want to do is say something on live television that could be used by McMahon in court.
      Challenges about Bret fitting in? He was a WWF guy who had no allies, he had trashed the company, Hogan, and Flair, he is a loner without many friends and wasnt adept at maneuvering in political climates.
      Bret’s 98 title run? Pushed to the side because Goldberg, Sting, and nWo wolfpack were getting much stronger reactions.

  • @BokHog
    @BokHog 3 роки тому +9

    "2.8 million is ridiculous. No way I offered that. "
    5 minutes later..
    "Yeah, I gave him 2.6 million"

    • @pauldavis5665
      @pauldavis5665 Місяць тому

      2.6 isn't 2.8 so he was telling the truth 😀

  • @Netsolace-tech
    @Netsolace-tech 3 роки тому +30

    Eric: Bret wasn’t a draw.
    Also Eric: Hey Bret! I will pay you 2.8 million dollars.

    • @cs8593
      @cs8593 2 роки тому +4

      Yes, I agree. I love how Conrad & Eric say none of the contract at the start. Saying Bret is lying. But let's go back to how much he actually signed Bret to. The Exact amount Bret said he offered him? But Bret lied... none of this never happened. Come on. One thing even Vince says there was a bidding war with Bret. But they have the right to their opinion. & Their "Facts" But when Bret's story never has changes in 20 plus years. I know who's story I'm going with.

  • @pikkon899
    @pikkon899 5 років тому +6

    I have to agree with Bret on saying that Ric Flair would go 20 minutes with no psychology. They'd lock up, Flair would go for a wrist lock, his opponent would reverse it, Flair would scream in pain, go to the ropes, hit the turn buckle, take the back body drop, plead for mercy by screaming "noooo!", get up and poke the guy in the eyes, go to the turn buckle and chop the guy, attempt an Irish whip, have it reversed, hit the turn buckle again, take another back body drop and repeat the process all over again. It's entertaining but, yeah. It was like that with every time, even when these 2 wrestled in the WWF for the title.

  • @dk03gq
    @dk03gq 6 років тому +97

    Sorry to hear that Bischoff got amnesia

  • @Al-nt8tn
    @Al-nt8tn 5 років тому +24

    Bret was way over than hogan, hbk in my country. I'm from India and back in the mid 90's bret's name was in the mouth of every kid in India.

    • @ravensblm
      @ravensblm 5 років тому +3

      Lol Bret might've been over there but here in the states where it really matter hulk waz king bret really never draw a dime anywheres

    • @Tad1945
      @Tad1945 5 років тому +6

      bret was big in the UK aswell.

    • @vycanismajoris6871
      @vycanismajoris6871 5 років тому +6

      Yeah same here in Sweden! We love Bret. Same with Jake The Snake and Ultimate Warrior!
      I knew literally no one who cheered Hogan over them.

    • @StuUngar
      @StuUngar 4 роки тому

      John Cook Im curious about the Warrior in the UK?
      Bret has always talked up the reception he received when he fought Davey.
      Ive seen that PPV numerous times and its clear to me that Davey got the biggest reaction of the night and Warrior was a close second.

    • @bigbaba1491
      @bigbaba1491 4 роки тому

      @@Tad1945 germany too...US fans have no clue how big bret really was over here

  • @raymondsolisjr.1262
    @raymondsolisjr.1262 6 років тому +16

    Eric is becoming as delusional as Hulk Hogan

  • @chrissabin5003
    @chrissabin5003 6 років тому +74

    Bret literally said in his book he kept a tape recorded diary during his career for a future book at the end of it. I'm not aware of anyone else, other than Jim Cornette, who took that level of recorded keep for an accurate end product.

    • @jessieb9384
      @jessieb9384 5 років тому +11

      Brets a bull shitter and a liar where the tapes then why has no-one heard them brets a bitter old fuck who was a mark for himself everyone knows it except Bret fans anyone who's ever done buissnes with Bret knows what he was like Bruce Pritchard has said the same things Eric is saying now

    • @aaronscott4984
      @aaronscott4984 5 років тому +5

      @@jessieb9384
      There's plenty of tapes fuck he was wired when he got lied to about Montreal it's in his Wrestling with Shadows documentary

    • @evilsWa
      @evilsWa 5 років тому +10

      Aaron Scott yeah he was wired for a documentary that doesn’t have anything to do with him keeping an audio journal as he claims.

    • @crashintonickdm
      @crashintonickdm 4 роки тому +3

      Jessie B bischoff, is that you?

    • @jeremyhuntshorsejrmedia
      @jeremyhuntshorsejrmedia 3 роки тому

      I know Jericho kept a record of every match he ever had 😁

  • @madagrar7265
    @madagrar7265 3 роки тому +6

    Gonna disagree with Eric on him saying Bret didn't get over and it was Bret's fault. I thought he was over. He always got the pop in WCW. If you consider him not being over, maybe you should blame yourself or creative or whoever wrote his forever fence straddling position for the entirety of his time there. He was nWo, no he wasn't, yes he was, was he a good guy, was he a bad guy - it swapped every other week so no fan could ever really commit 100% to booing or cheering and maybe that turned into apathy (what you would consider "not getting over") but that's hardly his fault. And before you call me a Hart fanboy, I think the guy's a whiny prick, but I also remember growing up watching this and I've watched it repeatedly as an adult to affirm my memories. One of the best technical wrestlers, yeah, kind of boring routine matches, of course, promos were forgettable but I'll give the guy his due. He was over, you're wrong, Eric.

  • @christiancharles2866
    @christiancharles2866 6 років тому +10

    Bischoff had 2 year run of success and thats it. He was terrible in wwf and tna. Bret Hart is a star worldwide still and had a great career. BRET HART LEGEND.

    • @rockcatinc.4814
      @rockcatinc.4814 4 роки тому

      Exactly. WCW wasn’t built or drawing on Bret. He was an after thought there. I watched those episodes when they aired and it always -ALWAYS- looked like Bret had an I don’t care attitude each time on TV. Maybe that is his character, but he was boring. Period. As far as Eric, he was mostly a talent on wwe and in TNA. I don’t know how much control he had at either.

  • @herrstarr4726
    @herrstarr4726 6 років тому +134

    Say what you want about Brett, but he put on the most entertaining matches to watch.

    • @philjoyce1548
      @philjoyce1548 5 років тому +16

      A lot of guys say their best matches were with Brett....he definitely made decent guys look much better than they were

    • @jordanwillett8456
      @jordanwillett8456 5 років тому +18

      He was boring his matches were always the same he was a trasional champion wwf used when Hogan left until they could fun a replacement Bret never takes any blame for anything in his career he's old bitter washed up and a mark for himself

    • @QoQabai658
      @QoQabai658 5 років тому +6

      @@jordanwillett8456 it almost sounds cruel when you say it out loud but Bret definitely had his issues. However he did put Shawn and Steve over so thank god for that at least.

    • @NotAGarage
      @NotAGarage 5 років тому +2

      **** Bret

    • @ironfistfreddie
      @ironfistfreddie 5 років тому +6

      @@jordanwillett8456 "His matches were boring...." coming from a guy who never took a bump in his life...... lol....

  • @doomedhuh
    @doomedhuh 6 років тому +29

    Eric's trying to bury bret on purpose because he's spoken ill of him so often. So much of this was inaccurate. There was no negotiating with Bret in 1996 when he was the hottest free agent? Hall and Nash got favored nations clauses a year into their contracts after they were already signed? what??

    • @michaelshea5251
      @michaelshea5251 6 років тому +3

      I'm confused.. Bret was the hottest free agent in 1996? Not true.. and I say that as a 11 year old at that time that was absorbed in the nWo and WCW. Bret would have made zero difference at that time as Hogan, Hall, and Nash blew everything else out of the water.

    • @doomedhuh
      @doomedhuh 6 років тому +2

      Hall and NAsh signed to wcw as soon as their wWF deals ended. Bret was a free agent from the spring to fall of 96. not under any contract.

    • @acidmack1041
      @acidmack1041 6 років тому +4

      Michael Shea Well like you say, you were 11 years old at the time so what would you have known about it? Bret was a free agent 2 months before Hall even showed up on WCW TV and 4 months before the nWo even formed.

    • @redhawk0329
      @redhawk0329 5 років тому +1

      @@michaelshea5251 are you an idiot? Hogan wasn't even hot at that moment until NWO started and Hall and Nash were definitely under him before NWO. But where you're most stupid is that they were all under contract, not free agents.

    • @waxoftriple9
      @waxoftriple9 5 років тому

      Hall and Nash both have verified they did not have the favored nations clause until AFTER they signed with WCW.

  • @brypete
    @brypete 5 років тому +23

    I call b.s. Bret has stayed so consistent on topics over the years..and his story never changes..do an interview with easy e in a year about this topic and it will be different.

  • @KSECMPUNK
    @KSECMPUNK 6 років тому +45

    I honestly can't deal with Eric not remembering half the stuff Conrad has to ask, but goes on rants about stuff that has not been asked.

    • @scrappy93
      @scrappy93 3 роки тому +2

      Considering his job, age, and businesses he he has run it's easy to see him initially not remembering this stuff. Only marks would complain about that.

    • @KSECMPUNK
      @KSECMPUNK 3 роки тому +4

      @@scrappy93 I think you mis understood my comment. He's doing a podcast about going down memory lane, he is asked a question and usually cant remember. But he goes off on on about stuff that wasn't even asked. It's like I can't answer that but here's this about this. It's fine, as everyone loves a story and bit of rambling, that's why people listen to stuff like cornette, but with bishoff it's really jaring, you get to the point where conrad has to keep going back to the original question over and over.

    • @user-su1xk3mv2b
      @user-su1xk3mv2b 3 роки тому

      @@KSECMPUNK well said

  • @GeoGuy388
    @GeoGuy388 6 років тому +71

    Eric: "I don't have payrolls sitting in front of me, but if somebody can PROVE he made 2 and a half million, so be it."
    Conrad: "I have the data. He made 2.66 million."
    OOPS

    • @jessejgarza6373
      @jessejgarza6373 4 роки тому

      Lol.....burn.....

    • @fjccommish
      @fjccommish 4 роки тому +1

      Eric revealed what he is doing, what he knows he does, when he accused Brett of making up so many stories that now Brett can't tell what was true and what wasn't. That's what Eric has done. He no longer knows the real details because he's made up so much shit.

    • @johnthomas5314
      @johnthomas5314 4 роки тому

      @Ze TheGame everyone knows Bret didn't draw like Hogan, Austin, the Rock or Savage, but what is this absolute myth that Michaels was drawing back then, either? Michaels finally got kinda hot during 97', and then just as quickly dropped the belt (rightfully so) to Stone Cold, and disappeared for like 3 years. His title run in 96' and anything up until his heel run a year later were generally box office disasters.

    • @roninkraut6873
      @roninkraut6873 4 роки тому +1

      Ze TheGame
      Exactly! I mean I believe the guy who paid someone top dollar who couldn’t draw any money. Eric gave Bret every opportunity to succeed in WCW and it’s all Bret’s fault for failing. Right off the bat they booked him to immediately to take advantage of coming off the biggest storyline in wrestling after the Montreal screw job. He came in red hot but it’s Bret’s fault that he didn’t make it by being a special referee in the Hogan and Sting match and it’s Bret’s fault that only Nash, Hall and Hogan ran the show backstage. WCW was a failure because of Bischoff. They had so much talent from top guys to the mid card. Not only did they have the huge names from WWF’s past but they had new talent that had to go to the WWE to be recognized. WCW had everything they would ever need to succeed except competent leadership. When you have top names like Hogan, Macho, Hart, Sting, Flair, etc to maim event and the mid card has Jericho, Guerrero, Benoit, Mysterio, etc and you still fail it speaks volumes that Eric is a fucking liar and is rewriting history to cover up his absolute incompetence as a promoter. He’s trying to bury Bret here because Bret has called him out for being an idiot and little Eric’s feelings got hurt.

  • @robertdeniro19
    @robertdeniro19 6 років тому +106

    Yeah Bret wasn't a draw and that's why you spend an entire podcast talking about him....

    • @jordanwillett8456
      @jordanwillett8456 5 років тому +15

      They have an entire podcast on doink the clown too don't mean he was ever a draw Bret Hart is the biggest Bret Hart fan he blames everyone else for anything that ever happened brets full of shit there's a reason everyone in the business buries him

    • @ESPLTD782
      @ESPLTD782 5 років тому +8

      ... I’ve seen this comment a few times. Listening about Bret for FREE is one thing, going out and buying tickets to see/ hear about him would mean he’s a DRAW (back in the day terms) that’s what he means when he says draw, he doesn’t draw people to pay for his Shit or to come see him. A podcast is free anyone can search this Shit up

    • @brypete
      @brypete 5 років тому +10

      To say Bret Hart didn't draw is by far the dumbest thing I have ever heard..Bret was a huge draw over seas and in Canada..and when he was heel doing the anti American thing he was the most hated man in wrestling...so for Bret not to be a draw is a flat out joke..

    • @justmytwobits
      @justmytwobits 5 років тому +2

      Killer Joe That is bs..

    • @Boo-yaa86
      @Boo-yaa86 5 років тому

      In wcw he wasn’t no one paid to come and see him because imo he wasn’t used properly if they had good programmes and story lines with him against great wrestlers that they did have he would of done good but just like vince said wcw wouldn’t no what to do with a Bret Hart

  • @davidschnare9945
    @davidschnare9945 5 років тому +10

    Bret was a far superior wrestler then Flair ever was

  • @GCP123
    @GCP123 5 років тому +5

    I bought a ticket to a WCW house show in 1998 to see Bret Hart. Me and 5 friends.

  • @GeeCoach35
    @GeeCoach35 6 років тому +28

    Fact is Brett was white hot when he came to WCW. The Montreal Screw Job 20+ yrs later is still one of the top 10 angles/storylines in wrestling history and whoever was on creative dropped the ball without coming up with something to take advantage of that as soon as it was possible. I actually believe Brett when he says he was put on the shelf at Hogan's request because it makes no sense otherwise to miss such an opportunity.

    • @user-su1xk3mv2b
      @user-su1xk3mv2b 3 роки тому +3

      The Brett Hart story got bigger once UA-cam got popular. No1 cared about this story arc back in let’s say 1999 or 2000

    • @MrAdmvp
      @MrAdmvp 2 роки тому

      Only person that was white hot was Vince McMahon.

    • @josephmatthews7698
      @josephmatthews7698 2 роки тому

      @@user-su1xk3mv2b I did and hart fans did. He was doing talk shows about it and the legal proceedings.

    • @m8datmoney837
      @m8datmoney837 2 роки тому +1

      Not true he couldn't wrestle for WCW till January 98 but since he sucks at real promos not scripted ones they couldn't just give him a mic n let him talk. Sorry but he wasn't no scott hall or Kevin Nash on the MIC

    • @darthbigred22
      @darthbigred22 2 роки тому +1

      @@josephmatthews7698 Where in Canada? Wasn't a thing in the states or he wasn't doing any of the big talk shows back then. Certainly wasn't Oprah or anything like Dateline, Primetime live, or 20/20.
      I was a teen then and wasn't watching WWF or WCW I had no idea who he was. Even the Simpsons episode he was in that sounds like the same voice who does Duffman and his name is so generic "Hitman". No one gave a shit about the Lonesome Dove prequel other than old people
      I got into WWF in 99 and I still had no clue who he was until much later. I only knew who HBK was from being a hidden character in the games and being commissioner. The kids at school were talking nWo and I remember the shirts around 96 until around 98 ish. WWF takes over for sure as a teen back then in 99.
      That's what annoys me about all this revisionism by WWE and the IWC.
      As a little kid I didn't watch WWF/WCW in the 80s but I knew who Hulk Hogan was, I knew Sting, I knew Ric Flair, I knew Macho. In the 90s when it got big I knew of nWo, Hall, Nash. Then SCSA/Goldberg. Finally I started watching.
      Bret/HBK were big in the same way any WWE champ not named Brock Lesnar, John Cena, or the Rock after 2008 is. They are big internally and everyone who doesn't watch wrestling or E! had no idea who they are.
      It's why when I watched "Wrestling with Shadows" I truly wonder what the hell the documentary was going to be about had the screwjob not happened? Bret was not that big a guy and was the documentary just going to be about him staying in WWF had he stayed or him leaving without issue to WCW had he left? Either don't seem like anything you'd make into a documentary. If you're going to do lesser know guys, like say "Beyond the Mat" does then they need to be doing interesting stuff like a 55 yr old broken down Terry Funk doing moonsaults at ECW or Jake the Snake being a drug addict.
      If Montreal was a work then Bret is a legend if it's a shoot then him and HBK need to suck down their pride and admit those two leaving in late 97/early 98 was the best thing that could have happened to WWF and all the evidence and history from those who lived it point to that.
      Fuck WWE revisionists, Fuck Melzter, Fuck the IWC.

  • @patrickzipperer178
    @patrickzipperer178 5 років тому +24

    Needs upper level talent for Thunder....since all of the upper level talent there are tied up in the nWo. Then when Bret gets there, puts him in a convoluted back and forth with the nWo....yep.

    • @miked2075
      @miked2075 4 роки тому

      Patrick Zipperer facts that confirm that Bischoff is either liar, or a complete moron. I don’t think he’s a moron.

    • @ToxicAvengerCleanYourMind
      @ToxicAvengerCleanYourMind 3 роки тому

      Lol, yeah...such lazy and boring storytelling. It made absolutely no sense to put him in the N.W.O and could of had "Legend climbs the ladder" type angle hyping up matches against Sting and Hogan but instead of any type of thought out long driven storyline they go the easy and lazy route. I blame Bret just as much for even agreeing with going in the NWO.

  • @manoshs5323
    @manoshs5323 6 років тому +150

    We get it. You guys don't like Bret Hart- and took this opportunity to bury him. The bottom line is that Eric brought him in, paid him a lot of money but completely dropped the ball. Your reasoning of holding back to create anticipation is weak because the Montreal situation was white-hot - and you didn't capitalize. Of course Bret became apathetic - who wouldn't when the boss can't even stick to a storyline , and bulks under the pressure of "that doesn't work for me brother"

    • @billyray5232
      @billyray5232 6 років тому +3

      manosh S Was a huge fan of Bret as a kid, he took over for Hogan when he left, who was my fav as a child...

    • @chadpugh1490
      @chadpugh1490 6 років тому +15

      Vince was absolutely correct when he said WCW wouldn't know how to use Bret Hart.

    • @davenwatts8173
      @davenwatts8173 6 років тому +1

      manosh S YUP!!!!

    • @edporetz5963
      @edporetz5963 6 років тому +8

      manosh S Bischoff claiming Brett didn't get over is laughable.

    • @lotsathedetox
      @lotsathedetox 6 років тому +11

      Yep. He thinks Kevin Nash was more valuable. That is laughable as well.

  • @rumtuckskatter
    @rumtuckskatter 6 років тому +23

    Eric is channeling his inner Artful Dodger in this episode.

    • @travismcdonald6576
      @travismcdonald6576 6 років тому +1

      David R I’m sure he’ll be sniffing Hogan’s seat almost as bad as The Dodger does Shawn Michaels.

    • @jefferygwatkins
      @jefferygwatkins 6 років тому +1

      Well, you know...

    • @lotsathedetox
      @lotsathedetox 6 років тому

      I think artful is huge stretch. It wasn't hard seeing through the BS. All 2:40:00 Now Brother Love is an Artful Dodger.

  • @joncrack187
    @joncrack187 6 років тому +69

    Notice how heated Eric gets when he feels like Hogan is getting slandered.
    We should all hope to have a friend like that lol

    • @WarriorSmurf
      @WarriorSmurf 6 років тому +18

      That's his boyfriend, what did you expect? They took the cash grab at TNA and contributed nothing. They shamelessly did that as a couple....awwwwwwww. Lol.

    • @GLPitt1
      @GLPitt1 6 років тому +10

      He is very loyal to Hogan, I wonder how loyal Hogan is to him?

    • @BreathFreeAndRemainNameless
      @BreathFreeAndRemainNameless 6 років тому +1

      I wonder if he’s afraid of lawsuit from Hogan.

    • @valleygunslingers3020
      @valleygunslingers3020 6 років тому +9

      Eric bischoff is such a hulk hogan mark

    • @neckutter
      @neckutter 6 років тому

      Jonathan Champion Eric suredoes stick up for Hogan. And Bury!!! Brutus the Fing barber beefcake

  • @mattdrohan9989
    @mattdrohan9989 3 роки тому +3

    The contradictions and B.S. by Bischoff just piles up as the interview goes on. He claims Bret never drew money, the $2 M contract was just "being at the right place at the right time", then says "we didn't have a plan for Bret because it happened so quickly", yet they clearly setup a feud with Hogan at the conclusion of SC97. Later, "I wasn't part of the booking, I was the president...", but clearly remembers that Hogan was never at a booking meeting. Also notice when asked about specifics, he claims not to remember but then goes on a diatribe about all the inner workings and random incidents unrelated to the question. Meanwhile, Bret's story has remained consistent and accurate in every detail for 2o years.

  • @blindterrytucci2752
    @blindterrytucci2752 6 років тому +84

    Hearing that Bret is so into Western gunfighter movies makes me realize that people may have been taking Bret’s gimmick and personality the wrong way all these years. Straight laced, no nonsense, no real emotion other than either calm or anger combined with “Hitman” and “Sharpshooter” and the idea that he was so good that he could beat anyone..the guy thought of “Bret Hart” as a gun fighter.

    • @nostalgiaman6816
      @nostalgiaman6816 6 років тому +10

      If you watched LEGENDS OF WRESTLING, Mick Foley talks about how he and Bret would trade books on stories about the War.

    • @joncrack187
      @joncrack187 6 років тому +13

      WWE did try to make him Cowboy Bret Hart at first

    • @TrueGritProductions
      @TrueGritProductions 6 років тому +1

      anti gun though, eh

    • @blindterrytucci2752
      @blindterrytucci2752 6 років тому +1

      Are you saying Bret is anti-gun? I hadn’t heard that.

    • @McCucumber
      @McCucumber 6 років тому

      Who?

  • @TheWazperviz
    @TheWazperviz 5 років тому +6

    I always wish Bret Hart could had been used much stronger in WCW

  • @stephaniekeever1637
    @stephaniekeever1637 6 років тому +32

    His entrance music sucked in wcw

    • @LivinhItUp
      @LivinhItUp 4 роки тому +1

      God awful. Not only was the overall Hitman theme was a head banger, but the opening riff let everyone know who was about to walk through the curtains.

    • @Buckdawg
      @Buckdawg 4 роки тому +1

      It grows on you don't worry 😉

  • @RomeoBarnes
    @RomeoBarnes 5 років тому +14

    If he was supposed to be the wcw guy in the WCW vs NWO thing(which sounds great by the way) then why put him on Nitro and in the NWO?

    • @blueblur2273
      @blueblur2273 5 років тому +2

      Because fans weren't feeling him much as a face.

    • @royjonzejr
      @royjonzejr Рік тому

      They originally had a plan where NWO would do a hostile takeover of Nitro, and it would be called NWO Nitro, and WCW Thunder would be WCW's show. But they did a test run of the "NWO takes over Nitro" idea on the December 22, 1997 episode and the ratings bombed, so they cancelled that plan.

  • @travismcdonald6576
    @travismcdonald6576 6 років тому +38

    Bischoff calls Hart a liar, but his best friend is Hulk Hogan. Bret has been tearing Bischoff to shreds for years. I guess this is his receipt.

    • @Aizenborgman
      @Aizenborgman 6 років тому +1

      Travis McDonald yes bret is a liar

    • @surgeoforange3107
      @surgeoforange3107 6 років тому +2

      Where do i begin? What a load of shit!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I bet ppl believe eric's dream. Eric, you remember all these meetings but forget how much you paid Bret hart? hahahaha. Ok then! Eric, Bret wasnt a draw, yet you paid him TOP DOLLAR cash! You mentioned him with Hogan, savage, flair (BTW flair couldnt draw for shit. he was all southern draw. Nobody in Canada gave a shit, nor did anyone over sea's, or most of america. sorry but that's fact) in same sentence. You're all over map on this one.
      Hogan came to WWF in 1993, so was flair and in 1992 when they where on top, DIDNT DRAW! As Bruce Prichard said, nobody cared to be quiet frank. WHATS THAT ABOUT DRAWING POWER? They where already on way down in all kinds of numbers, WWF and wrestling that is because of steroid scandal. In 1993, Hogan couldn't pick up viewing numbers or house show numbers or ppv buys as CHAMP, you know the #1 guy! Fact was, he was behind Bret in popularity at that time. Bret was most IMPACT and profitable wrestler in ALL of north america at this time.
      So Bret wasn't a star, yet...every1 knew his name, was all over tv's, media. Had a #1 song about him in Germany, top Canadian, wwf biggest draw outside of america, won everything in wwf, made MILLION's and was handed #1 heel in 1997 a long with most popular wrestler in wwf 3 outta 6 years he was champ. Yet, can't draw, not a star power? WTF is eric talking about???? Buddy, you dont like Bret, thats fine but at least be HONEST and real in your podcast. You are contradicting yourself, dumbass. Listen, if Bret wasnt that big... he wouldnt be able to get no where near that cash and his name wouldnt be top 5 of all time in his ERA. Oh is Bret going to have fun with this one...
      Oh now HINDSIGHT he was signed for WCW Thunder. Anybody who knows and was close to wrestling and Bret... knows youre flat out, FULL OF SHIT esp on this one! Dont even try and pretend, now, that's why u picked Bret Hart! Maybe the ppl who dont know the in details, but you aint fooling the one's who know!
      Draw power? Bret was biggest star outside of America in his era, ask Vince or JR who have publicly said this how many times? Oh wait they're lying, lets listen to Eric B who cant even get his facts straight. BTW, the tickets bought and merch are TRUE indicators. Austin, Rock, Hogan, Cena are all bigger then Bret in America, but he's legit top 5! Who the hell saved WWF in days of fans leaving? Bret Hart. Who woulda been that champion and guy who could take wwf outta dark days in usa and go everywhere else and make money? Hogan and flair couldnt draw in those days in WWF and WCW where they wrestled in empty chairs and wwf still wrestled in full arena's for PPV and packed whatever taping event they had whichever size. Dont get it twisted that Hogan was drawing huge in WCW. Its a roster that draws... bookers, why do u think he couldnt draw in 1992-1993 in wwf when he came back? IN LATE 96 nwo was a cool faction, new look in wrestling...perfect take credit! But notice in cpl years that ended faaaaaaaaaaaast? But I thought Hogan drew? why did WCW sink? why did they lose to WWF in ratings all of a sudden, but they had biggest star ever hogan? Becuz its not one guy team, he needs bookers and great talent around him. Oh and dont go after Bret on wcw sink, you didnt let him wrestle anyone big or start a rivalry or push him to #1 to even say he couldnt draw in those days! So its just like austin and rock in wwf they had great roster backing em up but eventually in 2002 numbers started slipping and by 2004 it went right down. Not because rock and austin are not stars or cant draw.. it just became stale entertainment and nothing new to look forward too. Like any league you got stars but you def need talent around to make it fun and exciting with rivalry. Bret wrestled in era's with Bashiton booger, al montoya, eric bradford, sparky plug, skip, dean douglas, whalem murssy etc... Bret cant wrestle himself, he needs another top dog to start rivalry with. Imagine if he was pushed with savage, flair, hogan, warrior, jake snake, ric rude, mr perfect etc... he coulda been huge too wrestling great talent makes you big. Bret did it on his own because that was his only shot, vince seen that outta him! Hogan knew, dont wrestle bret or he'll be booed outta park, he wasnt the man after 1992. Thats fact, jack! No one can deny it. Hogan coulda helped wwf and helped push Bret to newer heights.. but meh he wanted yokozuna, that worked out well, that drew huuuuge lol!!!
      Bret WAS a star, made million's... had legion of fans everywhere. #1 selling book, top canadian, top selling WWE dvd. Lead wwf 4 different years in merch sales. Shawn loves to brag about his 1996 merch lead, mean while Bret was out for 6 months, fuck i hope you made most shawn!!! and when wrestling went to Canada he was THE biggest thing. Not even Austin, Hogan or rock and Goldberg could get over VS Bret Hart...neither in UK, Germany or south Africa etc... and you cant fight it because youtube or GOOGLE is your fucking friend in case you "forget" as u like to say in this podcast.
      You didnt let Bret Hart vs Hogan happen but once on a silly b.s. match that ended up them being "friends" you coulda had a rivalry, started a feud made/tried for millions off a match Hogan bulked at in WWF years earlier, which he prolly did again in WCW, thats why we didnt see it. But u let Hogan run ur show in WCW and u got what u deserved. Bankrupt!!! BTW since Hogan is draw by himself, what happened to wcw...while he was top guy? Why did u sink? exactly! Wow is this complete fucking joke of a podcast by you. Conrad is cool. BTW, wtf was Bret Hart in WCW anyways? Good, bad, good, bad, mid card, heavy weight champ, us champ, referee, HUH???????? Yeah thats YOUR mind set! Your ego is upset because Bret has said numerous times, youre full of shit and back stabbing POS. This podcast proves all lies you make up. I love when you pretend to tell us what u think now... Best Line. Bret Hart wasn't a draw...but i paid him top dollar just under Hogan. Thats an idiot, folks.
      Ill leave it as.. if Bret wasnt a big star, why are we talking about him? why does his name sell? why does have he have millions of followers? We are talking about him right now, because...HE WAS A FUCKING STAR! Not a Konan....

    • @jordanwillett8456
      @jordanwillett8456 5 років тому +1

      @Chris Terry
      The proof is with bret himself he's buries everyone he ever worked with he's a bitter washed up mark for himself he always blames everyone but best for his mistakes if you believe bret he never did anything wrong but if you listen to anyone who was there and seen what happened they'll tell you brets a liar

    • @leestenson6975
      @leestenson6975 5 років тому

      @@surgeoforange3107 bro you wrote "Hogan came to WWF in 1993." First of all he went to WCW in 1994

    • @snoopyfod1807
      @snoopyfod1807 5 років тому

      @@surgeoforange3107 what you're doing is spreading bullshit propaganda like a pedantic school boy.

  • @redfield1007
    @redfield1007 6 років тому +93

    Bret is always consistent and everybody else either says " I don't recall " or change their stories or like Shawn Michaels they outright admit they had lied. I'm going with Bret on this.

    • @FLITT
      @FLITT 5 років тому +9

      It's easier to maintain a simple lie than remember an complicated absolute truth.

    • @deathstar5138
      @deathstar5138 5 років тому +7

      Bret hart is a known liar

    • @aaronwhalen6433
      @aaronwhalen6433 5 років тому +8

      Always a few jackass Bret haters that flip the narrative lol. Guys like Michaels and others admit they lied and somehow Bret is still the liar lol

    • @MarLenBo
      @MarLenBo 5 років тому +15

      This. You don't need to remembet shit when you tell the truth.
      Bret's stories have been the same for 20 years. Everyone else "can't recall"

    • @miked2075
      @miked2075 4 роки тому +5

      Classic psychology always tells us it’s far easier to remember the truth. I don’t doubt that Bret has embellished, but there’s a lot about Bischoff’s account that does not add up. He literally says he would’ve never offered Bret that kinda money, but he actually signed for pretty damn close to that kind of money. I don’t understand how he can say one thing with a straight face when the reality of the actual contract is not in line with his words.

  • @jacobg8707
    @jacobg8707 4 роки тому +2

    Bret had too many enemies in WCW, and they were politicking behind the scenes against him before he even arrived in WCW. Why Bischoff is trying to pass the blame of Bret's wasted time in WCW on Bret alone is stupid. Bret did every dumb job he was given - Fight Flair. Join the nWo to let Hogan be the leader of the hottest wrestler at the time. Waste Bret fighting Sting on Nitro shows. Have Bret fight the mid-carders like Disco Inferno, Rey Mysterio, Eddie, Booker T, etc on Thunder. Make Bret a heel one week, have him turn face the next week, only to have him turn back as a heel the following week. Bret wasn't a draw and that's why the WWF got rid of him? The WWF was on an upswing while WCW was plateauing in the ratings. Bret was the main champion during the upswing because he was finally getting Austin over. Bret wasn't allowed to team with Bulldog or Anvil to create a new Canadian faction in WCW.
    Is Bischoff inferring that Bret somehow was the one who made all of those horrible decisions?
    Hogan never wanted to pass the torch to Bret. Flair didn't like that he had to drop the title to Bret. Nash and the kliq had too much heat with Bret. Owen died less than a year after Bret arrived in WCW. Bret is given US title runs with no shots at the World title until Russo showed up in 2000. And even then, Bret is made the leader of nWo 2000 Black and Silver with Hall, Nash, Jarrett, and Steiner as his overdue "big push" after WCW sucked him dry...

  • @Mainzer74
    @Mainzer74 6 років тому +3

    I wonder if everyone bitching about dishonesty and not recalling things can tell me what happened in their weekly life 20+ years ago .

    • @rockcatinc.4814
      @rockcatinc.4814 4 роки тому

      Gary Mainz Jr exactly. I made a similar comment.

  • @TheVileOne
    @TheVileOne 5 років тому +7

    You know who wasn't drawing in 1999? Hulk Hogan. Who they still put the belt on twice.

  • @davenwatts8173
    @davenwatts8173 6 років тому +72

    If anyone thought biscoff wasn't the king of BS, here's your proof, any episode of 83 weeks

    • @markmullins5822
      @markmullins5822 6 років тому +11

      He was there, you weren't

    • @dmanentertament125
      @dmanentertament125 5 років тому +6

      Read Bret Hart book he threw in the towel when he went to WCW

    • @jessieb9384
      @jessieb9384 5 років тому +3

      @@dmanentertament125
      Lol that book is full of lies and bull shit he's a bitter old man who bought into his own gimmick and found out he wasn't as important as he thought he was

    • @josephdelledonne2098
      @josephdelledonne2098 5 років тому +3

      @@jessieb9384 Bret compared himself to Beatlemania in his book, what BS. I actually agree with what Eric says here, no way would he offer Bret more money than his buddy Hogan was getting. Also, Eric is right, he was making himself sound like Elvis, or actually, as I stated above the Beatles. Ugh.

    • @DmanDice
      @DmanDice 5 років тому +2

      Joseph Delledonne
      Theres a few details i believe eric on here. But the overall interview is Eric either not remembering or making excuses for how they used bret. Which was ridiculous lol. Nash doesnt even like bret but hes in charge of brets bookings lol. Laughable.

  • @tron9137
    @tron9137 3 роки тому +9

    Bret got buried by the Hogan machine behind closed doors, he could've got over huge after the screw job. They should've did a sit down interview, discussing his last days at WWF. Have that interview on a week to week basis. Then set up his first angle. That would've got Bret over with the wcw audience.

    • @darthbigred22
      @darthbigred22 2 роки тому +1

      Doubtful he wasn't that big when he left.
      He even tried to do a shoot with MadTv and that failed as well.

    • @bobby.m136
      @bobby.m136 Рік тому

      ​@@darthbigred22 I wouldn't say it was bret wasn't that big... He was, imo. I'd say that there was no shortage of top talent in this time period and loosing one more or less was no biggie

  • @romans52345-cy3tq
    @romans52345-cy3tq 6 років тому +49

    There is an HBO Special about Eric Bishoff coming out next month and it will be titled "I can't recall the specifics: The Eric Bishoff story"

    • @hansno1475
      @hansno1475 5 років тому +1

      "I didn't recall then. And I don't now."

    • @romans52345-cy3tq
      @romans52345-cy3tq 4 роки тому

      @Definitely NOT DB Cooper It was DB Cooper, it said so on Unsolved Mysteries

  • @Kayfabe-226
    @Kayfabe-226 6 років тому +38

    How many times can a guy say "I DONT RECALL"...I almost feel I'm listening to a guy giving a deposition or testifying before Congress...yes you should have dropped everything to get Bret on TV because that screwjob the night before was biggest story around and Bret could have buried Vince and wwf and your nitro show could have had even bigger ratings on TV...either you made mistake by not jumping on that moment or their is another reason that only you know and don't want to talk about...just like the wrestlers you say are trying put themselves over in their book so do guys like you that do podcast want to put yourselves over...example of saying I actually didn't need Bret but I had Thunder and needed another top guy and even though he's not drawing I'm gonna give him all this money anyway... really??

  • @TravJam317
    @TravJam317 5 років тому +8

    I believe 100% that Kevin Sullivan booked that War Games match at Fall Brawl 98. It has his trademark overbooked gimmick match written all over it.

  • @bradleyweas615
    @bradleyweas615 4 роки тому +2

    That's why Simpson wanted Bret Hart not some jabroni

  • @JASONMORTY1982
    @JASONMORTY1982 5 років тому +17

    You can't call someone a liar and you say " I can't remember "

  • @davidnorman3745
    @davidnorman3745 Рік тому +5

    Bret Hart was the biggest heel in 1997, an underrated heel in my opinion.

    • @perfectblindguy
      @perfectblindguy Рік тому

      I never liked the whiney bret gimmick.........

  • @84slaughter
    @84slaughter 5 років тому +19

    I Grew Tired Of Conrad Rather Quickly...

    • @evilsWa
      @evilsWa 3 роки тому

      @Ry G meaning… He’s not letting Bischoff give his version of the story because he believes what he wants to believe… You do realize that Conrad Thompson has absolutely zero history in the wrestling business right? And any opinion that he has when talking to people that actually live through these events is all based off of what Dave Meltzer reported right?

  • @botdad1348
    @botdad1348 6 років тому +22

    Hey Bischoff, Who are you to doubt Bret Hart? I don't believe a lot of what was said in this podcast. It's not just what Bret Hart has said about what happened behind the scenes, it's lots of other guys too who have similar things to say about Eric Bischoff and this time period. Bischoff feels like an executive who lies through his teeth to avoid admitting anything that could be used in a lawsuit.

    • @curthennig9448
      @curthennig9448 Рік тому

      Even some of his teeth aren't real just like his total denial on most subjects.

  • @adamfein4970
    @adamfein4970 5 років тому +29

    I love how Thompson will call both Prichard and Bischoff out. He's not aiming to shoot on either of them, but he knows the smell of bull and calls it bluntly without issue when he gets wind of it.
    Thompson, you're one of the best if not THE BEST in the shoot business.

    • @newwaveknight1
      @newwaveknight1 3 роки тому +3

      It feels like, unlike other shoot interview guys, he is kind of a voice for the fans.

  • @pgoughms
    @pgoughms 6 років тому +111

    I don't like the way Eric buries Hart in this. WCW dropped the ball.

    • @surgeoforange3107
      @surgeoforange3107 6 років тому +13

      Where do i begin? What a load of shit!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I bet ppl believe eric's dream. Eric, you remember all these meetings but forget how much you paid Bret hart? hahahaha. Ok then! Eric, Bret wasnt a draw, yet you paid him TOP DOLLAR cash! You mentioned him with Hogan, savage, flair (BTW flair couldnt draw for shit. he was all southern draw. Nobody in Canada gave a shit, nor did anyone over sea's, or most of america. sorry but that's fact) in same sentence. You're all over map on this one.
      Hogan came to WWF in 1993, so was flair and in 1992 when they where on top, DIDNT DRAW! As Bruce Prichard said, nobody cared to be quiet frank. WHATS THAT ABOUT DRAWING POWER? They where already on way down in all kinds of numbers, WWF and wrestling that is because of steroid scandal. In 1993, Hogan couldn't pick up viewing numbers or house show numbers or ppv buys as CHAMP, you know the #1 guy! Fact was, he was behind Bret in popularity at that time. Bret was most IMPACT and profitable wrestler in ALL of north america at this time.
      So Bret wasn't a star, yet...every1 knew his name, was all over tv's, media. Had a #1 song about him in Germany, top Canadian, wwf biggest draw outside of america, won everything in wwf, made MILLION's and was handed #1 heel in 1997 a long with most popular wrestler in wwf 3 outta 6 years he was champ. Yet, can't draw, not a star power? WTF is eric talking about???? Buddy, you dont like Bret, thats fine but at least be HONEST and real in your podcast. You are contradicting yourself, dumbass. Listen, if Bret wasnt that big... he wouldnt be able to get no where near that cash and his name wouldnt be top 5 of all time in his ERA. Oh is Bret going to have fun with this one...
      Oh now HINDSIGHT he was signed for WCW Thunder. Anybody who knows and was close to wrestling and Bret... knows youre flat out, FULL OF SHIT esp on this one! Dont even try and pretend, now, that's why u picked Bret Hart! Maybe the ppl who dont know the in details, but you aint fooling the one's who know!
      Draw power? Bret was biggest star outside of America in his era, ask Vince or JR who have publicly said this how many times? Oh wait they're lying, lets listen to Eric B who cant even get his facts straight. BTW, the tickets bought and merch are TRUE indicators. Austin, Rock, Hogan, Cena are all bigger then Bret in America, but he's legit top 5! Who the hell saved WWF in days of fans leaving? Bret Hart. Who woulda been that champion and guy who could take wwf outta dark days in usa and go everywhere else and make money? Hogan and flair couldnt draw in those days in WWF and WCW where they wrestled in empty chairs and wwf still wrestled in full arena's for PPV and packed whatever taping event they had whichever size. Dont get it twisted that Hogan was drawing huge in WCW. Its a roster that draws... bookers, why do u think he couldnt draw in 1992-1993 in wwf when he came back? IN LATE 96 nwo was a cool faction, new look in wrestling...perfect take credit! But notice in cpl years that ended faaaaaaaaaaaast? But I thought Hogan drew? why did WCW sink? why did they lose to WWF in ratings all of a sudden, but they had biggest star ever hogan? Becuz its not one guy team, he needs bookers and great talent around him. Oh and dont go after Bret on wcw sink, you didnt let him wrestle anyone big or start a rivalry or push him to #1 to even say he couldnt draw in those days! So its just like austin and rock in wwf they had great roster backing em up but eventually in 2002 numbers started slipping and by 2004 it went right down. Not because rock and austin are not stars or cant draw.. it just became stale entertainment and nothing new to look forward too. Like any league you got stars but you def need talent around to make it fun and exciting with rivalry. Bret wrestled in era's with Bashiton booger, al montoya, eric bradford, sparky plug, skip, dean douglas, whalem murssy etc... Bret cant wrestle himself, he needs another top dog to start rivalry with. Imagine if he was pushed with savage, flair, hogan, warrior, jake snake, ric rude, mr perfect etc... he coulda been huge too wrestling great talent makes you big. Bret did it on his own because that was his only shot, vince seen that outta him! Hogan knew, dont wrestle bret or he'll be booed outta park, he wasnt the man after 1992. Thats fact, jack! No one can deny it. Hogan coulda helped wwf and helped push Bret to newer heights.. but meh he wanted yokozuna, that worked out well, that drew huuuuge lol!!!
      Bret WAS a star, made million's... had legion of fans everywhere. #1 selling book, top canadian, top selling WWE dvd. Lead wwf 4 different years in merch sales. Shawn loves to brag about his 1996 merch lead, mean while Bret was out for 6 months, fuck i hope you made most shawn!!! and when wrestling went to Canada he was THE biggest thing. Not even Austin, Hogan or rock and Goldberg could get over VS Bret Hart...neither in UK, Germany or south Africa etc... and you cant fight it because youtube or GOOGLE is your fucking friend in case you "forget" as u like to say in this podcast.
      You didnt let Bret Hart vs Hogan happen but once on a silly b.s. match that ended up them being "friends" you coulda had a rivalry, started a feud made/tried for millions off a match Hogan bulked at in WWF years earlier, which he prolly did again in WCW, thats why we didnt see it. But u let Hogan run ur show in WCW and u got what u deserved. Bankrupt!!! BTW since Hogan is draw by himself, what happened to wcw...while he was top guy? Why did u sink? exactly! Wow is this complete fucking joke of a podcast by you. Conrad is cool. BTW, wtf was Bret Hart in WCW anyways? Good, bad, good, bad, mid card, heavy weight champ, us champ, referee, HUH???????? Yeah thats YOUR mind set! Your ego is upset because Bret has said numerous times, youre full of shit and back stabbing POS. This podcast proves all lies you make up. I love when you pretend to tell us what u think now... Best Line. Bret Hart wasn't a draw...but i paid him top dollar just under Hogan. Thats an idiot, folks.
      Ill leave it as.. if Bret wasnt a big star, why are we talking about him? why does his name sell? why does have he have millions of followers? We are talking about him right now, because...HE WAS A FUCKING STAR! Not a Konan....

    • @neilsun2521
      @neilsun2521 6 років тому +7

      If Bret "wasn't a draw" then why on earth did they pay all that money for him. Almost as if the agenda really was to hurt Vinnie McMahon.

    • @Jrocc811
      @Jrocc811 6 років тому +8

      I dont like Eric, but Bret is pretty into himself. Its pretty annoying.

    • @ngonzoak
      @ngonzoak 5 років тому +3

      I don’t blame Eric though. Bret dogged the shit out of him a few years back and even called him a maggot and dumb.. but then said right after that he likes Eric. I love Bret but he goes after everybody and seems very bitter. Eric as a man I’m sure was just like fuck this guy I’m gonna air out my side of Bret being a difficult asshole. All that said I believe Bret more than Eric.

    • @That90sShow
      @That90sShow 5 років тому +2

      @@ngonzoak Did Bret say anything not true about Bitchoff? All Eric does here is lie, its pathetic

  • @paulpothier6660
    @paulpothier6660 6 років тому +7

    no offense but the whole show was eric not knowing anything or bret hart was full of shit, I don't remember anything but that. I hope the vince one next week is better

  • @bubba8672
    @bubba8672 5 років тому +11

    This is one of my favorite podcast I've been a subscriber since the first airing of 83 weeks every podcast Conrad Thompson touches is great podcast

  • @brettpritchard265
    @brettpritchard265 6 років тому +8

    Okay, so Eric needs to start preparing for these podcasts A LOT better than he is right now. His memory isn't reliable cold. I don't buy for one !millisecond that he and Bret weren't in negotiations in 96. I just don't. I respect that he's trying to be measured in what he says about Bret, but there are still glaring inconsistencies you could drive a bus through. You're doing great Conrad, but be harder on him, even harder than that. I just don't buy a lot of what I heard here and much of it was useless because the man simply doesn't remember... Can't wait to hear Bret's response to this.

    • @kbmvpnyknicks
      @kbmvpnyknicks 6 років тому

      Brett Pritchard I agree wit u 💯 how can meltzer report those same negotiations a year B4 they actually happened. So Eric just happened to give him those same numbers that were reported by meltzer a year later!!

    • @neilsun2521
      @neilsun2521 6 років тому

      Brett Pritchard Compare this with Bruce Prichard's memory of matches from that era. Bruce remembers every little thing, inside out.

  • @badbabybear1
    @badbabybear1 5 років тому +7

    I love how Conrad bluntly calls Bischoff on his bullshit but this also makes me realize Bischoff more. Bischoff is direct and honest and not afraid to assess situations from his perspective and call bullshit on others. He's also a bit of a bullshitter himself.

  • @WarriorSmurf
    @WarriorSmurf 6 років тому +41

    So, Bret didn't come up with the body armor hidden under the hockey jersey spot against Goldberg, right Eric? The same spot where you suggested Hogan come to the ring and lay both guys out with a chair?

    • @StuUngar
      @StuUngar 6 років тому +4

      WarriorSmurf Bret said in an RF shoot that Kevin Nash came up with the idea.

    • @adamjabbar6760
      @adamjabbar6760 5 років тому

      StuUngar spot on

  • @turtlehead2
    @turtlehead2 6 років тому +13

    Bret would've been the top guy in WCW if he'd have brought the WWE title with him like Ric Flair did when he went to WWF.

    • @WeissVogel
      @WeissVogel 5 років тому +2

      Not so. Flair’s situation in walking out with Big Gold was different. Madusa was a partial precedent for the rationale behind Montreal.

    • @darthbigred22
      @darthbigred22 2 роки тому +1

      Doubtful Bret was going to the company with all the guys who were bigger than him when they all worked together the first time. What did he expect?

    • @turtlehead2
      @turtlehead2 2 роки тому

      @@darthbigred22 I’m sure he didn’t expect that shit. He could’ve had classics with Eddie, Dean, Jericho I believe was there, midcard guys his size, DDP, etc. He could’ve had a solid run. But had he left WWE as the champion he would’ve had a better run. Eric knew the way he left WWE he had no leverage

  • @Jatycre
    @Jatycre 6 років тому +22

    It should be noted that the end of the newest episode of this show effectively proves this entire episode is bullshite.
    One man proves Bischoff is lying here, and that man is..... Eric Bischoff, from 1996.
    Quotes from Eric himself in 96 have surfaced that prove he DID offer Bret a deal in 96.

    • @NotaPizzaGRL
      @NotaPizzaGRL 6 років тому +6

      The real question is why does Conrad have a grudge against Bret Hart? First the Montreal and Kliq episodes with Bruce Pritchard and now this.

    • @Jatycre
      @Jatycre 6 років тому +4

      REZ I think it all stems from how close Conrad is with Ric Flair.
      It’s kinda weird at this point though, since Bret and Flair made amends a few years back.

    • @redhawk0329
      @redhawk0329 5 років тому +3

      It's already public knowledge. Don't know why he outright lied.

    • @Drummer8282
      @Drummer8282 5 років тому +2

      It’s because Conrad’s favourite is Flair and Bret is 100x better than Flair. So Conrad will continue to shit on Bret in an effort to convince people of his personal opinion that Flair is better.
      Seen one Flair match and you’ve seen them all.heard one Flair interview and you’ve heard them all;
      I’m.The.Nature.Boy...Ladies.Love.Me. wooo
      Kiss.Stealing.bla,bla.bla
      Wooo
      Yawn.

    • @evilsWa
      @evilsWa 5 років тому +1

      I love how you Hart marks cant understand why anyone would possibly dislike Bret. And your reasoning is always “he puts on great matches and knows lots of moves”. So does HBK but you Hart marks certainly have issues with him, mostly because Bret Hart told you to.

  • @sithari518
    @sithari518 2 роки тому +5

    Lol I love how Eric throws a fit about Bret lying and conflating 2 stories, but when Conrad asks Eric directly, he doesn't recall, or doesn't remember. Then how tf do you know he's lying if you don't remember??

    • @JD-xz1mx
      @JD-xz1mx 8 місяців тому

      ....... Are you kidding?
      Because there are some things you know you would remember if they did in fact happen. I don't know where I was on January 22nd, 2003, but I know I wasn't wrestling a moose.

  • @adrianwalters2318
    @adrianwalters2318 Рік тому +7

    You can hear from this podcast that Eric was absolutely clueless. You missed handled one of the greatest wrestlers of all time just listening to Conrad list of the matches Bret was put in while you ran WCW says it all!!!!💯

    • @HarleyQuinnSoldier
      @HarleyQuinnSoldier Рік тому

      But if he was one of the best then why was he tied with Kevin Nash as the lowest drawing WWF champions? You'd think the best/greatest would get the massive ratings

    • @adrianwalters2318
      @adrianwalters2318 Рік тому

      @RedHood_Vegeta because Wrestling as a whole was down because of the drug scandal involving Vince Mcmahon and Hulk Hogan. Everyone knows this Bret made the most money across Europe and his storyline with Austin kick started the attitude era

  • @americasmaker
    @americasmaker 5 років тому +10

    This is a classic episode. When Eric and Conrad bump heads it's a classic.

  • @NeoSoulCrew
    @NeoSoulCrew 5 років тому +15

    If he couldn't draw why would you give him a top dollar contract?

    • @Timmyk5150
      @Timmyk5150 3 роки тому +2

      Proof that Bischoff knows absolutely nothing about the wrestling business.

    • @peterslupek6561
      @peterslupek6561 3 роки тому +1

      In his defense bischoff does say Bret was the best choice out of the top guys because Michaels/taker were not available.

  • @kellyweldon9054
    @kellyweldon9054 5 років тому +9

    I'd really like to hear more details on this plan that Eric had for NWO NITRO and WCW THUNDER. Was Nitro going to feature matches like Savage vs Hall? Was WCW going to have it's own champion? I just don't see how it would have worked.

    • @crashintonickdm
      @crashintonickdm Рік тому

      That’s because it was never the plan. This is just a cop out because he can’t explain just how bad he fucked up bret in wcw

  • @DHARMYOGCOM
    @DHARMYOGCOM 5 років тому +3

    Eric had no idea what to do with Bret Hart. He NWO which was the best thing that happened to wrestling and this idiot ruined it all. This guy was lucky with other people’s ideas and he had no idea to make it a success. Vince would have made NWO more famous and probably would have ran with it even today. Eric was a curse to wcw. I hope he reads this comment

  • @danielpascual4015
    @danielpascual4015 4 роки тому +8

    The backstage stuff unfolding from the past is a better story than anything coming out in pro wrestling today 😂😂😂

  • @ViktorEngelmann
    @ViktorEngelmann 5 років тому +3

    If Bret was so bad, explain to me why he was in five, F-I-V-E of the Top 20 best matches of all time (in WWEs own Top 100 list), including spots 10, 7 and 2

  • @michaelforsythe9350
    @michaelforsythe9350 5 років тому +15

    Bischoff takes forever to get to the point in his answers starting with one of the very first questions about Brett asking for 3-mill. He rambles on almost to the point where you forget what the question even was.

  • @JM-tv9og
    @JM-tv9og 2 роки тому +2

    Bischoff: “Bret didn’t draw….”
    - but, the Montreal screwjob is the most notorious wrestling history moment.
    Bischoff: “Bret didn’t draw….”
    - but he had the Highest rated matches of all wrestling history (Bret vs. Austin, Bret vs. British Bulldog, Bret vs. Shawn Michaels [ironman match].
    Bischoff: “Bret didn’t draw….”
    - but, THIS episode (on Bret Hart) has the MOST VIEWS on this fan-boy 83 weeks channel (which Conrad has BENEFITTED from)…
    Hmmm… 25 years later, Bret seems to Keep Drawing an audience…

  • @9493waltbabyluv
    @9493waltbabyluv 4 роки тому +3

    People love to bury Eric and will blindly believe anything Bret says. But I consistently hear Biscoff owning most of his BS while Bret is constantly painting himself as the hero in his own movie. It's ALWAYS someone else's fault. It's never Bret, let him tell it. WCW didn't do right by Hart as far as creative, but he didn't do himself any favors with that half-assed effort. He was never known for great storylines or promos. He was known for having great matches and he didn't have any in WCW. Can't blame Bischoff for that.

  • @markant9534
    @markant9534 Рік тому +2

    Bret was more of a solid draw as WWE champ than Deisel or HBK which is why they both had to drop the belts after short runs as champ, Bret saved the WWE during it`s lowest period, the WWE was doing better business in 97 than it was in 96, Bruce Pritchard said Bret was always a solid draw as champ, just not a great draw.

  • @stylechyld
    @stylechyld 3 роки тому +4

    Its funny how eric says many occasions he cant recall but yet when bret talked about a deal was made in 96 he clearly remembers everything now. 😁😂

  • @epec20
    @epec20 2 роки тому +2

    Bret Hart comes across with integrity. Bishoff, McMahon, Shawn, HHH all come off like compete douche bags. There's no more to say.

  • @pauls2101
    @pauls2101 5 років тому +5

    Bret Hart was a great wrestler but in his latest interview on the Jim and Sam show he talks about how he kept WWF afloat. I’m no wrestling expert but with names like Austin, Triple H, Shawn Michaels, Rock, Undertaker, Mick Foley and so on, he has the most overinflated ego.
    Love him or hate him Vince McMahon kept the boat afloat with the roster he had.
    WCW brought most of the big names and overkilled it with the countless NWO incarnations. And misuse of great wrestling talent.
    Eric Bischoff dropped the ball by giving Hogan, Nash and so on creative control.
    Hart had to many hits to the head if you ask me.

  • @davidnorman3745
    @davidnorman3745 Рік тому +2

    I usually agree with Eric but he messed up big time with Bret. He could have lit a fire under Bret but instead he took an age bringing Bret in and bringing him as a special referee was lame. It was doomed right off the bat, because of Eric.

  • @TheeCoachg
    @TheeCoachg 6 років тому +11

    Can we PLEASE get a Curt Hennig episode and why one of the greatest wrestlers of that era was relegated to running arm & arm with Vincent as an NWO lackey?? What about why Randy Savage was in an angle where he watches Bischoff make out with Elizabeth?? Or maybe when he stood in front of an office of 85 ppl and said he’d break Ric Flair and his family and that Flair “Never drew one single dime!” ....is that all Bret Hart’s fault too???

  • @Hush_Money2
    @Hush_Money2 6 років тому +2

    Bret was good but he just didn't give a fuck in WCW he was there to collect a pay check and leave.Just like everyone was.

  • @unclestinky6388
    @unclestinky6388 6 років тому +5

    Connie is unfair to Eric in complaints about the bookers day-to-day decisions about Bret when Connie says, "You let it happen". (2:00.00) That is the same as blaming a GM of a football team for the play calling of the head coach. The results are ultimately the responsibility of the GM, but there is no point in hiring a coach if the GM plans to micro manage the day-to-day decisions - the GM should just do the coaching job himself rather than second guess and overrule the person he hires.
    If you could blame Eric for anything it is his choice for booker, not for the day-to-day decisions of the booker. Fans should be appreciative that Eric did not try to do the booking job that he did not feel qualified to do. Imagine the whining of the same fans if Eric tried to do that job with no experience rather than acknowledging his own short-comings and hiring someone who is a better fit. After all, fans in other sports hate it when an owner or some other highly ranked unqualified exec interferes in the decision making. Of course Vinnie Mac does it all in the WWE, but he is a population of one. That type of person is extremely rare and it is more of a strength than a weakness to realize that you are not that.

  • @bitesthedust
    @bitesthedust 6 років тому +19

    Some takeaways from this.
    I don't think anyone would seriously believe that when Bret tells Eric that he can be late when discussing his 1997 jump from WWF that he intended that to be written into his contract. More like he was forewarning him.
    Second - Eric says that Bret didn't contribute. Well, he certainly contributed to the Goldberg steel plate idea. Bret could have spoken up more, for sure. Why did or didn't is a question only he can answer. If Eric really believed that Bret wasn't a draw then why did WCW offer him a new deal in mid 1999?

    • @HhhHhhh-nu4lm
      @HhhHhhh-nu4lm 2 роки тому

      eric said in a interview that he offered bret contract because he wanted a big star to headline thunder

    • @HhhHhhh-nu4lm
      @HhhHhhh-nu4lm 2 роки тому

      yet he says in same interview bret did not draw ok

  • @georgeasimakos1744
    @georgeasimakos1744 4 роки тому +17

    Conrad is always so well prepared for these with the numbers.

  • @0311Trucker
    @0311Trucker 5 років тому +3

    He had no idea what to do with Bret Hart. He was to busy trying to look cool with Hulk Hogan. Throwing up hand signs and wife swaping with DDP.

  • @lkw7482
    @lkw7482 4 роки тому +8

    As much as we can all (including Bischoff) agree that Bret Hart was ineffectually used in WCW, EB's account comes off pretty credibly here. ...Also, I did not know that Eric Bischoff was the one to meet Bret coming off a plane that horrible night. Ultimately, the thought of that tragedy, and the concurrence of both parties on events here (in fact, Bret putting Eric over more than Bischoff gives himself credit for), is what may stick with me more than anything from this podcast.

  • @deathstar5138
    @deathstar5138 Рік тому +2

    Bret hart the biggest crybaby lier in the history of wrestling

  • @josephscott6388
    @josephscott6388 6 років тому +7

    hey conrad, if this stuff is true, does that make vince telling bret to go back to wcw and still get that deal *actually* vince calling bret's bluff? this may be the most intriguing wrestling podcast ever.

    • @Messifi10
      @Messifi10 5 років тому +1

      Or if the screwjob really happened LOL. Bischoff so full of shit

  • @jmi84
    @jmi84 5 років тому +3

    Bret was misused in WCW. Period. They never intended to utilize him. They just wanted to get him to finish off the WWE (so what they thought). Bret is a top 5 greatest wrestler of all time. Saying that he wasn’t a draw is ridiculous. The only good thing bischoff made was the NWO. No wonder Bret still hates him.

    • @michaelrimz4477
      @michaelrimz4477 5 років тому +1

      There was. Few good moments, I liked his US title series with DDP, and his feud with sting was enjoyable buy yeah mostly he was under utilised and misused badly, putting him in nwo with Hogan was so stupid, I think Hogan Wass scared of going into a feud with him in 98 so kept Bret as his lackey in nwo.

  • @dougripley861
    @dougripley861 6 років тому +36

    Can’t wait to hear Bret’s rebuttal lol

    • @83weeks
      @83weeks  6 років тому +22

      Us too.

    • @RickMiddleton-1
      @RickMiddleton-1 6 років тому +2

      83 Weeks another amazing podcast episode! I was never a huge "hitman" fan but I did always have respect for his abilities and contributions to the business we all love! Sadly at the end of all this there were NO winners. Everybody involved came away from this union with less than they walked into it with for many varying degrees of reasons. Keep up the outstanding work on the podcast!

    • @surgeoforange3107
      @surgeoforange3107 6 років тому +6

      Where do i begin? What a load of shit!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I bet ppl believe eric's dream. Eric, you remember all these meetings but forget how much you paid Bret hart? hahahaha. Ok then! Eric, Bret wasnt a draw, yet you paid him TOP DOLLAR cash! You mentioned him with Hogan, savage, flair (BTW flair couldnt draw for shit. he was all southern draw. Nobody in Canada gave a shit, nor did anyone over sea's, or most of america. sorry but that's fact) in same sentence. You're all over map on this one.
      Hogan came to WWF in 1993, so was flair and in 1992 when they where on top, DIDNT DRAW! As Bruce Prichard said, nobody cared to be quiet frank. WHATS THAT ABOUT DRAWING POWER? They where already on way down in all kinds of numbers, WWF and wrestling that is because of steroid scandal. In 1993, Hogan couldn't pick up viewing numbers or house show numbers or ppv buys as CHAMP, you know the #1 guy! Fact was, he was behind Bret in popularity at that time. Bret was most IMPACT and profitable wrestler in ALL of north america at this time.
      So Bret wasn't a star, yet...every1 knew his name, was all over tv's, media. Had a #1 song about him in Germany, top Canadian, wwf biggest draw outside of america, won everything in wwf, made MILLION's and was handed #1 heel in 1997 a long with most popular wrestler in wwf 3 outta 6 years he was champ. Yet, can't draw, not a star power? WTF is eric talking about???? Buddy, you dont like Bret, thats fine but at least be HONEST and real in your podcast. You are contradicting yourself, dumbass. Listen, if Bret wasnt that big... he wouldnt be able to get no where near that cash and his name wouldnt be top 5 of all time in his ERA. Oh is Bret going to have fun with this one...
      Oh now HINDSIGHT he was signed for WCW Thunder. Anybody who knows and was close to wrestling and Bret... knows youre flat out, FULL OF SHIT esp on this one! Dont even try and pretend, now, that's why u picked Bret Hart! Maybe the ppl who dont know the in details, but you aint fooling the one's who know!
      Draw power? Bret was biggest star outside of America in his era, ask Vince or JR who have publicly said this how many times? Oh wait they're lying, lets listen to Eric B who cant even get his facts straight. BTW, the tickets bought and merch are TRUE indicators. Austin, Rock, Hogan, Cena are all bigger then Bret in America, but he's legit top 5! Who the hell saved WWF in days of fans leaving? Bret Hart. Who woulda been that champion and guy who could take wwf outta dark days in usa and go everywhere else and make money? Hogan and flair couldnt draw in those days in WWF and WCW where they wrestled in empty chairs and wwf still wrestled in full arena's for PPV and packed whatever taping event they had whichever size. Dont get it twisted that Hogan was drawing huge in WCW. Its a roster that draws... bookers, why do u think he couldnt draw in 1992-1993 in wwf when he came back? IN LATE 96 nwo was a cool faction, new look in wrestling...perfect take credit! But notice in cpl years that ended faaaaaaaaaaaast? But I thought Hogan drew? why did WCW sink? why did they lose to WWF in ratings all of a sudden, but they had biggest star ever hogan? Becuz its not one guy team, he needs bookers and great talent around him. Oh and dont go after Bret on wcw sink, you didnt let him wrestle anyone big or start a rivalry or push him to #1 to even say he couldnt draw in those days! So its just like austin and rock in wwf they had great roster backing em up but eventually in 2002 numbers started slipping and by 2004 it went right down. Not because rock and austin are not stars or cant draw.. it just became stale entertainment and nothing new to look forward too. Like any league you got stars but you def need talent around to make it fun and exciting with rivalry. Bret wrestled in era's with Bashiton booger, al montoya, eric bradford, sparky plug, skip, dean douglas, whalem murssy etc... Bret cant wrestle himself, he needs another top dog to start rivalry with. Imagine if he was pushed with savage, flair, hogan, warrior, jake snake, ric rude, mr perfect etc... he coulda been huge too wrestling great talent makes you big. Bret did it on his own because that was his only shot, vince seen that outta him! Hogan knew, dont wrestle bret or he'll be booed outta park, he wasnt the man after 1992. Thats fact, jack! No one can deny it. Hogan coulda helped wwf and helped push Bret to newer heights.. but meh he wanted yokozuna, that worked out well, that drew huuuuge lol!!!
      Bret WAS a star, made million's... had legion of fans everywhere. #1 selling book, top canadian, top selling WWE dvd. Lead wwf 4 different years in merch sales. Shawn loves to brag about his 1996 merch lead, mean while Bret was out for 6 months, fuck i hope you made most shawn!!! and when wrestling went to Canada he was THE biggest thing. Not even Austin, Hogan or rock and Goldberg could get over VS Bret Hart...neither in UK, Germany or south Africa etc... and you cant fight it because youtube or GOOGLE is your fucking friend in case you "forget" as u like to say in this podcast.
      You didnt let Bret Hart vs Hogan happen but once on a silly b.s. match that ended up them being "friends" you coulda had a rivalry, started a feud made/tried for millions off a match Hogan bulked at in WWF years earlier, which he prolly did again in WCW, thats why we didnt see it. But u let Hogan run ur show in WCW and u got what u deserved. Bankrupt!!! BTW since Hogan is draw by himself, what happened to wcw...while he was top guy? Why did u sink? exactly! Wow is this complete fucking joke of a podcast by you. Conrad is cool. BTW, wtf was Bret Hart in WCW anyways? Good, bad, good, bad, mid card, heavy weight champ, us champ, referee, HUH???????? Yeah thats YOUR mind set! Your ego is upset because Bret has said numerous times, youre full of shit and back stabbing POS. This podcast proves all lies you make up. I love when you pretend to tell us what u think now... Best Line. Bret Hart wasn't a draw...but i paid him top dollar just under Hogan. Thats an idiot, folks.
      Ill leave it as.. if Bret wasnt a big star, why are we talking about him? why does his name sell? why does have he have millions of followers? We are talking about him right now, because...HE WAS A FUCKING STAR! Not a Konan....

    • @surgeoforange3107
      @surgeoforange3107 6 років тому +1

      83 Weeks he responded!!! Eric is fuking TOAST. I'm sure he cant recall still 😂

    • @Jatycre
      @Jatycre 6 років тому +2

      TheJD www.prowrestlingsheet.com/bret-hart-bischoff-83-weeks/#.WzPhjkpOmaM
      Be prepared, he BLISTERS Bischoff.

  • @thewrestlewrant5710
    @thewrestlewrant5710 6 років тому +7

    The assertion that Bret wasn't drawing for Vince in 96/97 has always bothered me. WWF numbers were down as a whole - Shawn's run with the belt had tanked yet he remained untouchable. And even if Bret had underperformed at the box office, he was responsible for getting Stone Cold - the biggest draw in history - to the top table.

    • @TheeCoachg
      @TheeCoachg 6 років тому +2

      The Wrestle Wrant Exactly. The company was in the midst of the steroid trial so ppl werent feeling wrestling as a whole in 93-94,and lets not forget Hogan refusing to do business so you have a champion who’s supposed to be your next guy but he cant get the rub from the guy leaving (which is ironic come 97). I just hate how ppl act like Shawn’s reign was doing the biggest numbers.

  • @McMachal
    @McMachal 4 роки тому +3

    How many other people did Dean Malenko injure? Maybe the reason you didn't hear about him acting the way Brett claimed, is because this was the only possible chance. He only ever hurt Brett, and showed his colours in that situation. Eric's response there is pretty damn short sighted, well no shit he was professional when he WASN'T hurting other wrestlers. Pretty fucking easy to do it then.

  • @hotchocolatefitness
    @hotchocolatefitness 6 років тому +7

    eric' back track'' bischoff he nededs to admit he droppedd the ball.

  • @neckutter
    @neckutter 6 років тому +67

    Eric sounds like a liar

    • @mikey122587
      @mikey122587 5 років тому +1

      @Edgehead10075 yep bet was lying

    • @markmullins132
      @markmullins132 5 років тому

      He is a liar, but he is not lying about this

  • @lotsathedetox
    @lotsathedetox 6 років тому +2

    This episode is bullshit. Get ready to jump in the shower after this one.