Can You Hear The Difference Between a Bechstein, Steinway and Bösendorfer Piano?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 8 січ 2021
  • 日本語バージョンはこちらです。 • スタインウェイ | ベーゼンドルファー | ...
    Definitely let me know what you think in the comments!
    This was filmed at「Kayacc Klavier」in Kyoto, Japan
    kayaccklavier.com/
    「鍵盤綺麗」www.panamusica.com/topics/kenb...
    #steinway #Bösendorfer #bechstein
    Check out my entire sheet music catalog (over 200 arrangements)
    tinyurl.com/68znyr7b
    Follow Me:
    ► SPOTIFY tinyurl.com/49dzyr4m
    ► ITUNES tinyurl.com/nhbjzbuf
    ► INSTAGRAM: goo.gl/TL29BM
    Sign-up to my newsletter and get a free sheet music present
    www.jacobkoller.com/
    Fur Elise, Pathetique Sonata 2nd Movement, Ode to Joy by Beethoven
    All Arranged by Jacob Koller
    Contact : jacob@jacobkoller.com
    Video Camera : Blackmagic Pocket Cinema Camera www.blackmagicdesign.com/prod...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 280

  • @aaronamadeus928
    @aaronamadeus928 2 роки тому +51

    My impression form these recording: In comparison, the Steinway's low end is the cleanest and best sounding, but especially the high end becomes very "cold". The Bechstein shines in the mids with warmth but the low end is even "muddy" in comparison to the Steinway. The Bösendorfer has a lot of overtones, especially in the mids. It has a very bright and playful character.
    If I could choose, I'd have to choose a cheaper Piano :P

  • @unworthyServant08
    @unworthyServant08 3 роки тому +26

    Böesendorfer gets my vote. It had me at the Fur Elise Jazz arrangement. The right amount of mellow, while still having clarity.

  • @Maya-yq8cd
    @Maya-yq8cd 3 роки тому +17

    Bechstein, Bechstein, Bechstein. It's feel like , the piano sings every own note of it.
    It's not just sound of notes, it's more..

  • @rufffamily333
    @rufffamily333 Рік тому +6

    Bechstein is the piano for me! The bloom explodes with soft colors like a colorful sunset. More often than not, the Bechstein brings tears to my eyes. ♥💝💘♥

  • @lanzi655
    @lanzi655 3 роки тому +19

    Clearly its Bechstein. Its just perfect in its higher tones and perfectly in its balanced deeper bass.

  • @pianist007
    @pianist007 Рік тому +5

    I could play that Bechstein all day! What an intimate and well integrated sound

  • @mikethebeginner
    @mikethebeginner Рік тому +13

    I'm not a piano expert or a musician, but I was struck by how downright familiar the Steinway sounds. We had one in our home when I was growing up, and of course I've listened to many recordings over many years.

  • @MythraxMusic
    @MythraxMusic 3 роки тому +43

    It was a tough choice, but I really think the Bechstein really shined in your recordings! Awesome video Jacob!!

  • @expltvdel
    @expltvdel 6 місяців тому +1

    The Bechstein sounds so much cleaner and clearer than the other two

  • @ycubed99
    @ycubed99 3 роки тому +68

    Honestly I prefer the mellow quality of the Bechstein, but I can see why the Steinway appeals to most people.

    • @monelleny
      @monelleny 3 роки тому +1

      I'm so surprised ... I always have, and still do, considered the Bechstein the least mellow of high-end pianos.

    • @Stelios.Posantzis
      @Stelios.Posantzis 3 роки тому +5

      I'd say earthy and dark not mellow but I think I see what you mean: I think it feels more subtle... subtle and harsh at the same time - if that makes any sense!

    • @saricubra2867
      @saricubra2867 2 роки тому

      Bechstein isn't really mellow. You have to hear a Faziolli piano, now that is mellow.

    • @hastensavoir7782
      @hastensavoir7782 Рік тому

      @@saricubra2867 don’t you think BOTH Fazioli and Bechstein are in contest for the brightest high-end instruments ever?

    • @AlbertoSegovia.
      @AlbertoSegovia. Рік тому

      There seems to be defined what constitutes what. I, what for years had considered what mellow is, have recently heard people call bright, and viceversa. Bechstein definitely is complex and earthy

  • @nohint9589
    @nohint9589 Місяць тому +1

    I´m not a professional piano player, but the Bösendorfer did i hear out from all the other ones (especially at last). So it´s Bösendorfer for me!

  • @Clavineum
    @Clavineum 2 роки тому +3

    The Steinway has a loud and imposing powerful tone.
    The Bösendorfer has a clear, but not a colourful tone.
    The only Instrument with a fine distinguishing, colourful tone is the Bechstein. 😌There is Music in the air! 🎧

  • @LangKuoch
    @LangKuoch 3 роки тому +42

    I always welcome the warmth of the Bechstein, as they have been my favourite pianos for a while now. They often carry out a sound that I can only describe as "dark" (or perhaps dim? Like a dimly lit living room), with a much softer sound and very little ringing/brilliance. Though that may sound like negatives, I find it very charming and the perfect piano for slower pieces, especially pieces where emotional expression is at the forefront of the piece, or perhaps a piece where you might not have any staccato or quick accented notes.
    That said, because of this, I think they have less versatility in comparison overall to the Steinway's or Bösendorfer's brighter and crisper sound (with the Bösendorfer being even more so than Steinway). Steinway is a happy medium.
    All three are incredible pianos and if anyone had one to give away I wouldn't be picky about which one it is! Haha.

    • @MrJdsenior
      @MrJdsenior 3 роки тому +1

      Interesting, I agree with your sonic observations and explanations of your first sentence almost to a T, and liked the Steinway (here) best. All in the ear, and preferences, of the beholder, I guess. Can I assume you prefer the 'sustain' , if you will, for those pieces that have "any staccato or quick accented notes"? There, too, I would think the Beck MORE suited to music of that type. Taste is different for all, even when perceptions of the instruments 'strengths' and 'weaknesses', or at least relative sonic parameters are agreed upon. Just found that curious. Perhaps it should have been no surprise...it won't be in the future. To each their own, as it should be. Makes arguments over 'which is better' ring kind of hollow, doesn't it? I will try to keep that in mind in the future too, as I tend to be entirely too immovable in opinions sometimes (my wife would laugh at the sometimes part). She actually did when I read this to her. After 31 years, you DO kind of get to know someone pretty well, I guess.

    • @philbarone4603
      @philbarone4603 3 роки тому +2

      I like the Bechstein too but I’d never buy one because the collaborated with Hitler and The Bechstein company never apologized for it. They really should put something up on their site but it might hurt their bottom line. The hell with them, I’ll stick with my vintage Steinway.

    • @MrJdsenior
      @MrJdsenior 3 роки тому +3

      @@philbarone4603 I hope you've never owned a Ford. I could name several other companies and individuals that would probably surprise you, as well, unless you are knowledgeable in the area.

    • @philbarone4603
      @philbarone4603 3 роки тому +1

      @@MrJdsenior can’t say that I have. Did Ford raise money for Hitler at his home? Mrs. Bechstein said that she wish that Adolph was her son. And ya know what? I get that that was a long time ago but the Bechstein company should renounce them in their site

    • @MrJdsenior
      @MrJdsenior 3 роки тому +4

      @@philbarone4603 No, they apparently did a WHOLE LOT worse than that. According to some documents recently discovered from that time period they helped the Germans retool their Ford and GM automotive factories to produce German war machines early on in the build up.
      Those that have read the documents state that they were doing this WHILE they were refusing to do the same thing here, early on, even though that had been requested of them by our commander in chief, the US president. As you say, a long time ago, and I have not personally seen the documents, so I can't personally verify thus, but it seems to be well known by many (not conspiracy theorists) lawyers etc. digging up documents from the time to be used in determining anti trust actions for current auto manufacturers today. I can tell you I have been told things about WWII, the Bay of Pigs, and Vietnam that you will NEVER see in the history books, not going to elaborate on those. I do know a book that does a very good job (according to one helping run the operation from one of our intelligence agencies) of explaining the Bay of Pigs, and it ISN'T pretty. Basically a story of promises, and then outright betrayal from the very top, and the results of that militarily. I diverge, sorry.
      If you look up writings directly from Ford's hand you will see that he was very anti Semitic and outspoken about it. Ford apparently gained Hitler's attention by those actions and Hitler openly praised Ford's writings.
      Both Ford and GM deny this then and now (shocker, huh?), and say they lost control over their German factories, but as I said, documents from the time apparently show that is not true. Evidently there are documents showing that high level executives in both companies were in absolute collusion, and that the companies profited heavily by aiding the enemy.
      If you asked me which is worse, some piano manufacturer having a **** on for Hitler, or American companies helping to manufacture the vehicles used by the Germans to take country after country, AND kill our guys, and a few others (like say, 20 MILLION Russians) there is absolutely no comparison, none whatsoever.
      My father in law was a B24 pilot and was shot down over Poland and it took the Polish partisans three months to get him out. This very rarely happened, in fact he wrote the book (with some others, I'm sure) on escape and evasion tactics for the a Army Air Corps, later the Air Force) and actually helped set up the training recruits received on the subject before entering the war. He was also instrumental in setting up SAC. I can pretty much guarantee you which one would have raised his ire more.
      You can google it and find this info many places, here is a Washington Post article on the subject, there are many more. It would be interesting to put an FIA request in, if applicable, and see what you'd get. Probably someone already has.
      www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/daily/nov98/nazicars30.htm
      Be careful though, as with all political footballs this one has lunatics on both sides that know absolutely nothing about the subject telling you all about what was and should be. Kinda like flat Earth, vaccination conspiracy sites and the like. Idiots, all.
      Some conspiracies are and were very real, though, just not many of them. Look up what REALLY happened at the Gulf of Tonkin that Johnson and McNamara used as an excuse to begin the Vietnam war, after all the baiting they had conducted without response. Hey, if you can't get them to react, just find some poor noobie sonar operator that gets everything completely screwed up (as reported by the pilots who were instructed to, and did bomb the hell out of open ocean) and say it was a military action taken against hostile forces that were attacking, ghost ships apparently, in that case. There are many days that should be defined as 'not our proudest moments' either.
      If you don't believe this you can easily search out FIA documents and recorded telephone calls involving the President and Sec Def where the matter is discussed. What we learn in school is mostly just utter garbage. The read history is SO much more interesting, and sometimes frightening. And no, I don't believe we brought down the Twin Towers, but I very much do believe 'we' (our intelligence services, and the things they DID report up the chain that should have been MONSTER red flags were ignored) was TOTALLY flat on their asses on that one.
      And that dumb "we didn't know they were going to smash planes into buildings" statement by the pres that day was utter nonsense. They ABSOLUTELY knew that could happen. It had happened elsewhere (not at that scale, obviously) and from what I understand there were already documents written describing pretty much exactly that scenario. Politics appears to consist mostly of CYA and lie.

  • @alexthompson6529
    @alexthompson6529 3 роки тому +8

    I've never really been 'team Steinway' but it sounded amazing. Tons of clarity and separation

  • @mrpad0
    @mrpad0 9 місяців тому +1

    Bechstein was much more rounded in sound, but coped with jazz less well than the others.
    Still preferred the Bech generally. An astounding instrument.

  • @akaki115
    @akaki115 3 роки тому +16

    Bechstein has a brilliant sound, pretty hummable lower tones and very soft high tones. I may be biased, but no Japanese or American pianos sound better than the German ones, in general.
    P.S.I managed to guess the blind test.

  • @RModillo
    @RModillo 3 роки тому +8

    The Bosendorfer really has a deep personality. I liked the basic flavor of Bechstein, but it didn't go so well with these selections. Would be better, probably, with classical-era (Mozart-Schubert) or maybe Brahms. The Steinway had the most variety of tone across registers, and so would be the best fit in this literature.
    Also, probably the pianist is most familiar with the Steinway sound, and has more practice in bringing out its best.
    In the blind test, hard to tell too much as it is completely soprano-based. The second piano made it sound very well.

  • @Xemerius7
    @Xemerius7 3 роки тому +3

    Awesome Video! Really like your playing on These pianos

  • @abhinavcheedella4296
    @abhinavcheedella4296 3 роки тому +10

    The Bosendorfer feels more raw and groovy

  • @cioccolateriaveneziana
    @cioccolateriaveneziana 4 місяці тому +1

    Winner: Bechstein. Loser: Bösendorfer. Optimal, reliable sound: Steinway. No surprise there.

  • @jiunc.1604
    @jiunc.1604 2 роки тому +31

    It's surprising how good the Bechstein sounds, and for half the price! I usualy prefer the tone of Bösendorfer over Steinway, but here the Bechstein stands appart from dose two. The Steinway had a well balanced tone but Bechstein had character as-well. I'd buy the Bechstein in this case.
    P.s. You are a fantastic pianist and i absolutely love your work! May your inspiration never fade off!

    • @cioccolateriaveneziana
      @cioccolateriaveneziana 4 місяці тому +1

      I haven't heard a Bechstein that would disappoint me. I'm not surprised it sounds so good.

  • @bandar7891
    @bandar7891 Рік тому

    I love them all, very clean & Clear sound no noise, mudiness.

  • @guyde3604
    @guyde3604 2 роки тому +1

    Bechstein = my preferred one, because of what I can only call its "warm", fuller sound. Bosendorfer a tiny bit too "sparkly" for me.

  • @tommytrekky855
    @tommytrekky855 3 роки тому +7

    I am a big fan of Steinway, but the Bechstein sounds much better in this case.

  • @xdia19xdiamondgirl19
    @xdia19xdiamondgirl19 9 місяців тому +1

    I love Bosendorfer pianos! Sounds so pretty in the video. Thanks for sharing!

  • @ellegould3154
    @ellegould3154 Рік тому +1

    Love the warmth of the Beckstein.

  • @mittimiracle1440
    @mittimiracle1440 3 роки тому +7

    クラシックのジャズバージョン、イイ〜❣️
    それに各ピアノの音色、いいわ〜🎶👍

  • @andersaxmark5871
    @andersaxmark5871 3 роки тому +10

    I’m partial to the bösendorfer but next time you should do it blind with just a 1,2 or 3 and then reveal which they are at the end
    Pepsi challenge style

  • @QuangNguyen-xq1lx
    @QuangNguyen-xq1lx 2 роки тому +1

    I like the lower register of the Steinway, but prefer the mid/higher register of the bechstein!

  • @lalalalalala8147
    @lalalalalala8147 Рік тому +3

    I always loved Bechstein, although the Bosendorfer has a beautiful clarity of sound that is also unmatched! Greetings from Hannover!

  • @petedaia1026
    @petedaia1026 3 роки тому +1

    Clearly the Bechstein! What's truly remarkable is that not only is the sound superior with balance and tone, It's also 93 years old! And that in itself speaks volume vs. the Steinway 52yrs old and the Bosendorfer 40yrs old! All competent pianos. Only one is superior!

  • @Lee---
    @Lee--- Рік тому +3

    Interesting comparison - the Bechstein M is the oldest (1928 vs Steinway B 1969 and Bosendorfer 225 1981) and the shortest (5'10" vs Steinway 6'11" and Bosendorfer 7'4"") and yet holds its own beautifully in the grand low registers as well as the sparkling and ethereal top notes. This is great news for me, as a recent purchaser of a 1975 Bechstein M. Certainly my own limitations play a role, but my experience as a serious amateur pianist who studied with private lessons for seven years with a Juilliard-trained Russian teacher is that the Bechstein is harder to play "cleanly" than the typical Steinway. I have found that I need to adjust my pedalling technique as well. It has been a challenge, but now after three months of daily playing I understand and can better control my Bechstein, am enjoying the beautiful resonance and colors and can confidently look forward to years of future enjoyment. Though I had initially set out to purchase a Steinway (a lifetime dream), the Bechstein M that I found was better than any of the vintage Steinways I tried out at double the cost, and I went right to the Steinway Factory sale, which was a huge disappointment. I'm a happy Bechstein convert. It's too bad that Bechstein no longer makes the model M.

  • @S_dr469
    @S_dr469 3 роки тому +2

    この企画久しぶりだぁ!!!やったぁ!

  • @pmtrieve2065
    @pmtrieve2065 2 роки тому +1

    Now that's a really fair comparison (NOT): a 1928 Bechstein Model M (5 ft 10 in), a 1969 Steinway Model B (6 ft 11 in), and a 1981 Bosey 225 cm (7 ft 4 in). Despite the huge size difference, the Bechstein had the best sound quality -- a beautiful singing voice. The Steinway sounded muddy and diffuse. The Bosey was had a similar in Bechstein-like sound but because it's size advantage it should have blown the Bechstein out of the water. Bechstein for the win!

  • @parkthoven
    @parkthoven Рік тому +1

    Considering the size, C.Bechstein M is the smallest then Steinway B, then Bosendorfer 225. I like C.Bechstein. Its high tone is bell like tone~ Though the smallest among the three and it's old model, it sounds GREAT~~!

  • @mylenekellerman2413
    @mylenekellerman2413 2 роки тому +2

    I loved the crisp rich tonal quality of the bosendorfer!

  • @calvinlewis8924
    @calvinlewis8924 2 роки тому +1

    I personally think that the differences between the pianos is minuscule at best, however I was pleasantly surprised by the quality of the Bechstein.

  • @PianoforPleasure
    @PianoforPleasure 3 роки тому +6

    I honestly can’t decide, maybe because how well the pieces were performed on all three instruments!

  • @kstudios6767
    @kstudios6767 3 роки тому +3

    I love Steinway piano but in this video I prefer Bechstein the better.
    この3台の中では、ベヒシュタインが音のバランスや1音を響かせた時の素直な響き、クリアさ、奏者の個性がちゃんと出せて良いと思いました。

  • @PS-vm3we
    @PS-vm3we Рік тому +1

    Bechstein is my favourite. Perhaps the least personality, but mellow and warm. The Bösendorfer is wonderfully crisp and reminds me of an old coffee house in Vienna. The Steinway is very impressive but too penetrating. At least for my preferred repertoire and my living room Bechstein is the winner. I actually got the blind test quite wrong, maybe because the range was higher. Overall, Bechstein seemed more consistent.

  • @aderbalsoares1988
    @aderbalsoares1988 2 місяці тому

    I liked all the pianos. My ears couldn't tell the difference.

  • @khaleesibell
    @khaleesibell 2 роки тому +4

    So glad with the blind test! Nailed it!Bosendorfer is my first choice, it's tune is, in my opinion, a balance between Steinway and Berchstein. In second place I go for Steinway and then Berchstein. But all the three are great pianos and I would love to play in each one ❤️

  • @marcus_w0
    @marcus_w0 6 місяців тому +1

    Wow! This was a hard one... I love Steinways and you could hear, that it's a Steinway. But overall, I like the Bechstein even a little bit more. All three were very close. What the Bechstein looses on sharpness, it gains in body and volume. Overall for those pieces played, I'd go for the Bechstein - although it's already $25,000 more than I could ever spend. What surprised me the most, was that this particular Bösendorfer had nothing of the dampness I critique the most on this manufacturer. On the second song, a Steinway becomes a Steinway. And you can tell.

  • @sandscribbler
    @sandscribbler 3 роки тому +9

    I thought they all sounded really nice. At first, I was leaning towards the sound of the Steinway (for its rich bass sound) or the Bösendorfer (for its good all-around sound). But I was completely fooled by the blind test, and thought the sound of (what turned out to be) the Bechstein sounded the best! If you're giving them away, I guess I'll take all three - though I don't know where I'll put them! :-)

  • @sebthi7890
    @sebthi7890 Рік тому +1

    Model M by Bechstein ist 50 cm shorter than the other to, but it is piano with character and depth

  • @sigfunaris
    @sigfunaris 3 роки тому +28

    The Böserdorfer needs a better tuning. My vote goes to Steinway

  • @SpencerDavis2000
    @SpencerDavis2000 2 роки тому +1

    I probably liked the Bosendorfer and Steinway most but the Bechstein does have a beautiful tone when you want something to be less bright and more warm. They are all beautiful.

  • @correasilvio2010
    @correasilvio2010 2 роки тому +1

    Bechstein Stenway and BOSENDORFER

  • @brdwyguy
    @brdwyguy 4 місяці тому

    It all depends on which room I was purchasing the piano for: A Rehearsal/Performance Venue most definitely the Steinway. If for my living/music room most definitely the C Bechstein. The Bosendorfer sounded like it needed more fine tuning work. It didn't sound velvety like a Bosendorfer usually sounds.

  • @jacobneal5388
    @jacobneal5388 2 роки тому +1

    In a way it was an unfair comparison because all three pianos were very different. The Steinway is a model b measuring 6’11” , the Bechstein is a model m measuring 5’10”, and the Bosendorfer 225 measuring at 7’4”. Size has a big difference on the tonal qualities of the pianos because of string length, soundboard surface area etc. So just keep that in mind. I personal preferred the clear tone and f the Steinway and its rich bass.

  • @Eric_Japa_
    @Eric_Japa_ 3 роки тому +2

    ステインウェイは綺麗で滑らかでステインウェイの音なんだけどあの滑らかさの音ってなんだが自分に合い過ぎて、よく知っている甘いsweetな鍵の音なんだよね。
    そんでもって、Bechstein音も馴染みある鍵の音なんだけど滑らかさっていうのかな?ステインウェイより少し音が乾いてるような(褒め言葉)感じでどっちが好きかといったら変だけどこの感じが個人的には一番好きなんだよね。
    最後のは本当にクラッシックビターな音色で1つのピアノとして本当に綺麗な音だと思う、でもこれは自分に無い音なんだよね何ていうかもしどれかのピアノが家にあったらこれだけが無いんだよね、そう、自分の家にないような音。これもまた好きだ

  • @garysandiego
    @garysandiego Рік тому +1

    I think this Steinway is versatile, well balanced, and nicely voiced. But I could sure understand why someone would choose the Bechstein for their home. It’s warm and friendly.

  • @spacewalden8358
    @spacewalden8358 3 роки тому +2

    Bosy is my fav, like the brightness and clarity !

  • @cmeyerowitz
    @cmeyerowitz 3 роки тому +3

    Steinway in my opinion sounded the fullest in every piece you so beautifully played

  • @markhomiak6966
    @markhomiak6966 2 роки тому +1

    I always liked Steinway, but there's no denying that Bosendorfer sparkle.

  • @BrianOxleyTexan
    @BrianOxleyTexan Рік тому +1

    Wow! I've not heard a jazz version of sonata 8 before, loving it.
    This video confirms my impression that Bechstein is best for Beethoven solo and chamber music.

  • @dahon14bike
    @dahon14bike Рік тому

    nice

  • @HyphenDude
    @HyphenDude 3 місяці тому

    I have had the opportunity to play all 3 of these great pianos. I would choose the Bösendorfer if I could only have one. Such a nice blend of warm but bright, with great action where you need it. If I was doing only concert hall, it would be the Steinway for the power produced to fill a room. The Bechstein is a great playful and bright piano but lacks on the fullness for lots of music, in my opinion.

  • @SevenDeMagnus
    @SevenDeMagnus 10 місяців тому

    Cool, it's time to buy all three.
    God bless.

  • @zbiegusek
    @zbiegusek 3 роки тому +3

    Damn, I can hear the difference, but they all sound great :) I can't choose :)

  • @peterb7435
    @peterb7435 Рік тому

    I have no idea which one sounds “better”. But the playing and the pianos are amazing

  • @engolivecomau
    @engolivecomau 3 роки тому +2

    Pianos aside, beautiful music arrangements and playing. Hard choice between Bech and Stein but not the Dorf for the music heard through the mics.

  • @korinnayvetterimando9364
    @korinnayvetterimando9364 Рік тому

    May I know what's the piece played for the blind test? Would love to listen to it more. Thank you so much.

  • @replacesoundboard
    @replacesoundboard 3 роки тому

    I was about to ask if you intended to release a Japanese version of the video. Then I noticed you put the link in the description.

  • @55bolts
    @55bolts Місяць тому

    My fave all the way around was the Bosendorfer. On the blind testI was correct on the Bosendorfer and flipped the other two. They sounded to similar to me.

  • @tedwilliams7021
    @tedwilliams7021 2 роки тому +1

    I’m a concert pianist. I love Steinway pianos, however if given a choice I will generally opt Bösendorfer over Steinway - but have to play both because they are so different as individuals it’s impossible to generalize which I prefer.

  • @interrestrial9815
    @interrestrial9815 3 місяці тому

    For years I played a Yamaha because it fit the music I was involved in. Then I played a Bosendorfer and I loved it. Now I may be moving into a combination of all the musical genres I have played and C. Bechstein has become a contender but so has Steinway. The new piano is about 2 years out, plenty of time to find out what genres will be dominant. But the Bechstein? I keep looking for instruments to play. Lots of fun, and money. The search for a new piano can be daunting.

  • @KingoftheJiangl
    @KingoftheJiangl 8 місяців тому

    The steinnway was the best. Bechstein felt muted, like it wants to say something but it can't. The Bosendorfer felt too tinny, might have needed voicing.
    Really nice improvisations on beethoven, it was nice even when you messed up.

  • @allan6554
    @allan6554 3 місяці тому

    I think Bösendorfer wins for the purest sound. The price follows the quality in this case.

  • @knockonwall
    @knockonwall 3 роки тому

    what's the music used for the last parts of the video? thanks

  • @JJ-tx3cl
    @JJ-tx3cl 3 роки тому +2

    私も好みはsteinwayに一票🎹しかしどれも美しすぎて、選べませんね☺️👏💐

  • @benuscore8780
    @benuscore8780 3 роки тому +1

    I liked the Steinway and Bosendorfer, since it seems that my preference is a brighter sound.

  • @livnlearnphx
    @livnlearnphx 3 роки тому +8

    For this video, the Steinway was overall superior in tone. In real life (with limited experience), I tend to prefer Bosendorfer for their action (the Steinways I've played are stiffer, and therefore tend to be harder to play softly).

    • @kelseyk530
      @kelseyk530 Рік тому

      When I was at the Mayo Clinic three times for treatments, they had two grand Steinway pianos...amongst priceless Warhol paintings and Chihuly sculptures. The keys were extremely hard to press. Granted, anyone could play on them and who knows when or if they had been tuned, but compared to my regular very old school upright piano (with a whole set of real ivory/elephant tusk), it was a shock how firmly I needed to press and how my dynamics went away playing songs that I had no issue with before.

  • @jacobberg5584
    @jacobberg5584 3 роки тому

    I prefer 2Bs to S. Obviously, S is resonant and loud. 2Bs are very clean.

  • @spekterum
    @spekterum 9 місяців тому +1

    As always Steinway! Crisp sound, depth and balance power between bass, mid and upper kesy.

  • @naomi7032
    @naomi7032 3 роки тому +2

    I thought there was a piano that matched each piece of music. I like all the tones of the piano.but Personally, the old tone is comfortable. My favorite was Bosendorfer .
    It's interesting that there's a commercial cutting in lol

  • @delta606
    @delta606 2 роки тому

    Steinway for sure. The others might have a warmer sound but they don't got the balance of absolute clarity and warm the Steinway does. For me at least

  • @mikepetroff4240
    @mikepetroff4240 2 роки тому

    I give it to the Steinway for overall balance, although a close call. Great musician you are!

  • @daisukipianomusic
    @daisukipianomusic 3 роки тому +1

    I think the preference really depends on how the player wants to play and what genre of music to play, and what song to play.

  • @watchingyoutube7330
    @watchingyoutube7330 2 роки тому

    What was that little improv piece that started at 6:45? It sounded like a Beatles tune but I can't put my finger on it.

  • @paxwallace8324
    @paxwallace8324 3 місяці тому

    The price of a New Bechstein B212 is 180000 usd. And it's quite a different piano than the older Bechsteins. It's been radically redesigned. It ain't your Grandpa's Bechstein. But I'd take a Mason & Hamlin

  • @RedWaveComing2024
    @RedWaveComing2024 2 місяці тому

    in these order: Bosendorfer, Steinway and Bechstein....i got a digital piano and have all these concert grand

  • @edwarddejong8025
    @edwarddejong8025 7 місяців тому

    Must be tough to sell foreign pianos in Japan when Kawaii and Yamaha are so strong.

  • @olivercarlehed
    @olivercarlehed 6 місяців тому

    I like Steinway best in this case, however Bechstein is my favourite brand.

  • @mikeellis6220
    @mikeellis6220 Рік тому

    The Bechstein wakes you up!

  • @markfreedman2470
    @markfreedman2470 Рік тому

    I think the same person probably voiced all three pianos. I think I’m not sure I like the Bosendofer the best. Sounds more full in the lower register. The Pianist however was the best part of this demo. Thanks

  • @zipangumaru8709
    @zipangumaru8709 3 роки тому +1

    1番の清涼感あるsteinwayが好きかもです

  • @michaltomsu6924
    @michaltomsu6924 3 роки тому +2

    Hi Jacob,
    I prefer the sound of Steinway for Test 1 but Bösendorfer for 2 and 3... Bechstein sounded muffled and dull to me. Thank you for the opportunity to hear and compare great pianos!

  • @wawacool9147
    @wawacool9147 3 роки тому +1

    yeahhhh

  • @Zenghai_
    @Zenghai_ 3 роки тому

    They all are wonderful pianos, but I still prefer the Steinway too. Very interesting test !

  • @bytheway1031
    @bytheway1031 2 роки тому

    🎂Carl Bechstein 06-01-2022 🎹

  • @waygoblue4729
    @waygoblue4729 Місяць тому

    My choice was the Steinway (I guessed the order correctly in the hearing only test).

  • @MrJdsenior
    @MrJdsenior 3 роки тому +4

    Short answer: Here, in this video, the Steinway.
    Long answer: I actually preferred the Steinway in this presentation. It seemed more sustained, resonant, and fuller than the others. I would place the Bose 2nd. One thing about these tests is I expect you could change nothing other than the mic placement and get totally different results, as having done recordings in the past, I know mic placement is critical. I don't know if different pianos have DIFFERENT sweet spots for mic placement, but it certainly would not surprise me if they did. Also placement in the room (closer to walls, etc) can dramatically alter sound, as I'm sure you are well aware, especially from certain chosen points in the sound field. Keeping all these things constant is obviously far beyond the scope of this video, though, as you probably did not want to spend an entire day, or more, generating just the raw video. It's interesting to note that others below preferred the piano I found least appealing. It's ALL taste and perception, in the final analysis, for a given person, isn't it. Apparently there is no 'best piano' for everyone, never has been, never will be. Yes, I could definitely tell a difference, especially between the Beck and the Steinway. I should do a double blind to see if that perceived difference was really there, and if I could pick the correct piano;, blind. I often found that doing blind tests with comparing different sound systems, as one example, offered a LOT more insight into what was really going on than what you THINK is going on. :-) Probably WAY deeper than you wanted this to go.

  • @michaeltutty1540
    @michaeltutty1540 Рік тому

    Prefer the Bechstein of these three. My favourite piano is an early 1900s Gerard Heinzman from Canada. They somehow capture the sharpness of the Steinway with the mellowness of the Bechstein along with an undertone that cannot be beat. I'm talking about one built prior to the 1932 takeover by Heinzman Piano Company, after which the Gerard became the second rank brand.

  • @bikemike1118
    @bikemike1118 2 роки тому

    10 different Steinways = 10 different sounds = actually not what a customer‘s looking for IMO

  • @sidneymcgill9179
    @sidneymcgill9179 6 місяців тому

    I liked the Bechstein but it was muddy in the lower register, upper register had a clear full bodied timbres

  • @judsonmusick3177
    @judsonmusick3177 3 роки тому

    The Steinway and Bosendorfer pianos in this test are the same design as modern Steinways and Bosendorfers. However, the Bechstein dates from 1928, and Bechstein has radically changed the design of their pianos since then. (The same can be said of Bluthner as well.)

  • @Physics_Channel
    @Physics_Channel 2 роки тому

    I think there's no comparison? The Bosendorfer sounds on another planet? Isn't it? But I might be biased sinc I am getting a Bosendorfer delivered to my lounge in Feb 2022 🙂, I'm happy about htat .. best piano in the world.

  • @yiannitrakas5582
    @yiannitrakas5582 Рік тому

    Bechstein has the bohemian rhapsody vibe, but the bosie has the most equal sound, steinway sounds the cleanest

  • @joeysandiego3870
    @joeysandiego3870 2 роки тому

    my favorite is bosendorfer used it on my songs