Bataille on Potlatch (Mauss and Lévi-Strauss)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 30 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 16

  • @thattimestampguy
    @thattimestampguy 4 роки тому +4

    0:24 Incest & Potlatch, 2 bizzare and terrible things. Who would be interested in this stuff?
    2:34 Claude Levi Strauss, author of _The Elementary Structures of Kinship_
    3:30 Potlatch - Ritual Sacrifice as a show of one's wealth
    5:13 It shows power, it demands reciprocity
    6:38
    1. Incest Taboo is where man distinguishes himself from other animals - Strauss
    7:53 _What is the common thread between Incest and Potlatch?_
    - Done for alliance - Done for bonds
    + Social Formation
    - World Wars are an expenditure mechanism
    - Waste/Sacrifice
    10:25 It is about Sovereignty & Freedom
    - Destructiveness of Maximum Utility
    - _The Need for Waste and Sacrifice_
    12:19 That is all

  • @skenzyme81
    @skenzyme81 4 роки тому +4

    Did ancient people’s really have no awareness that children born of incest were more sickly than other children? The differences in the rates of abnormalities is significant enough to be apparent in clan-sized groups.

    • @markusmannberg9788
      @markusmannberg9788 4 роки тому +3

      Of course they did. Historically speaking incest is largely confined to royalty, justified gods. Levi-Strauss was a structuralist anthropologist mainly concerned with mythology, which is where the incest-bit comes in. It’s symbolism, not investigative journalism.

  • @MrArtaque
    @MrArtaque 4 роки тому +3

    I like these way more than interviews

  • @rafi429
    @rafi429 4 роки тому +6

    Nietzsche= bataille= Deleuze = Nick Land .

    • @rafi429
      @rafi429 4 роки тому +1

      200 years of philosophy

    • @TimeLord1987
      @TimeLord1987 4 роки тому +1

      Which is why you people are сancer upon this earth. The West is the land of the dead indeed.

    • @spritualelitist665
      @spritualelitist665 3 роки тому

      Your seething resentment leaves not much to be desired….

  • @sillycuts
    @sillycuts 4 роки тому +4

    Whoa the jibe about primitive cultures is a bit ignorant. Bataille admired tribal cultures because they weren’t over run with Christian monotheism

    • @sillycuts
      @sillycuts 4 роки тому

      Also their reckless expenditure showed one could still have a stable culture were sacred and profane were ok

    • @JustinMurphy
      @JustinMurphy  4 роки тому +1

      Did I really "jibe"? What did I say that was a jibe?

    • @sillycuts
      @sillycuts 4 роки тому +2

      @@JustinMurphy at about the 1:08min mark . To suppose they are “ primitive “ one has to be superior ect , in here is Christian ideology . Whilst this was the accepted nomenclature towards tribal communities ( indeed later on you refer to First Nations as such) was to say “ primitive “. GB admires their expenditure says waste more , not demean and deride said cultures more..the boys over on acid horizons don’t do this

    • @galek75
      @galek75 2 роки тому +2

      @@sillycuts Okay Mr. Politically Correct

    • @DiamorphineDeath
      @DiamorphineDeath 2 роки тому

      The boys on acid horizon fall over themselves to apologize if any perceivable accidental slip of a term that any author they mention might have ever said in their respective lives. For so many leftists supposedly influenced by Nietzsche, they sure do grovel exceptionally well to satiate the current permissible social thought we find ourselves solely allowed to use, God forbid they quote an author with an antiquated approach to language, or third worldism