And it takes AA batteries to so when you run out of batteries for your radio and Disk player just take some of the militaries batteries and you got music on the battlefield
All these devices are great and give the military and police great advantages. The problem is our government is becoming completely untrustworthy and I have no doubt that the government we have right now would use these technologies against US citizens if we don’t comply with their demands.
Saw stuff with the water and explosive stuff years ago. The guy who created it made other stuff to render unexploded artillery shells safe with small shaped charges and many other innovations. They even made a type of bangalor torpedo, they called the bangalor blade, to deal with concertina wire and it was quite impressive.
I'm wondering if it's "needed" because current & future recruits are to feeble to do what others have done for multiple generations...hold it themselves.
@@LongWalkerActual In which case, a very subtle change in evolution? I would imagine that America's military would try beef up recruits so as to not rely on liable tech if the shit hits the fan. The intended purpose of advancing military tech is to augment and enhance performance, not become a handicap.
Soldiers are no longer soldiers but machine operators. F they love war so much have man to man combat its fairer, or better still let the leaders fight it out one on one, losers that country has whatever they went to war about like oil gas cobalt.though why do our governments start wars to take resources that are not theirs to take buy the things you won’t instead of killing millions or billions to get what isn’t your or in your lands, it’s evil, greed envy and hate, none will get to heaven, stop using the name of God to do your evil deeds.
Easibridge. Omg! I was an engineer in a guard bridge unit. We built ( man carried components) 60 ton load class medium girder bridge, one lane bridges with link reinforcement. Scaled way down i still see similarities between that and the easibridge.
That's way more than enough payload that making it autonomous is a rounding error. Spacex lands a 20-story building on a boat in the ocean, using a hover slam. The amount of failed landings has become exceedingly rare. Maximum 5 lb of hardware to give it a thousand times more brains than a Falcon 9 first stage. I think the best use for this technology is using them instead of a parachute. Probably get away with something a quarter the size. Then the soldier also has a personal drone for whatever you want to use it for. I want one in a bicopter backpack format. Used in conjunction with powered roller blades. The idea is to maximize autonomous stability.
It wouldn't need a someone. They fly em selves these days. The DJI camera drones ya can buy or awesome. They can follow you or fly a designated pre programmed path ya draw on ya phone and then "return to home" to the point they took off from to within a few inches using GPS. And they have awesome obstacle avoidance so they don't crash into trees, buildings or people etc. And that's all for just a $1000 to $2000. So of course the military ones would be just as good or better.🤷♂
Noticed on footage from Ukraine a leather device had a back piece of leather about 4ft by 2ft with strap, at bottom was attached like a leather bucket, im guessing the feet go into bucket area the wounded soldier lies back on the leather back piece were he probably gets fastened to this device, if it had two straps for your arms like a back pack yes you could carry a wounded person and fire your assault rifle, now this leather device could be something different but common sense says it's for extracting the wounded.
Make helmet that takes batteries and make it so they can be swapped out with a container holding the batteries quickly in the heat of battle all six plug and play and they can reload batteries after in a safe place if you can find one on the battlefield of today swappable battery pack and everyone should have one total battery replacement packs on them
So in your low IQ world we are supposed to stop making weapons whilst enemies continue to do so so that when conflicts happen we are woefully under gunned and overmatched? Horrible and frankly a childish response.
You cant tell if something of shown is reliable if it not use widenly in Ukraine. Otherwise it is either too expensive, too nishe or can be replased with more cheap solutions.
Easy bridge make the rungs wider so a Infantry soldier can walk across with a full combat load and why it's better to make each rung wider you don't want to cross on all fours unless you are under fire from the other side of the bridge good luck I've already done my service to America unless some joker from another Country pisses me off at 64 I can pop the head and throat with a M16 A2 with iron sights at Four hundred meters and if I had time to work with the newest assault rifle America came out with even better but I believe that America made a big mistake not using Bull pup design because it puts the weight of the weapon on the shoulder of the soldiers and keeps a full length barrel but shortens the overall length of the weapon it should have a grenade launcher under the barrel but keep everything else the rifle has the rounds and sighting system and then we would be cooking with gas and I will never understand why they don't have veterans to help in design of weapons systems because a lot of the time a soldier will come out with the best way to do things not a bunch of officers who are shinning the chairs in the Pentagon with their asses and start listening to soldiers they would tell us if we came up with something good that we would get money not this lifetime
The buddy strap looks perfect to strap a deceased enemy combatant on as a rear round catching device.
Although that's probably against the Geneva Suggestions er I mean conventions.
Its an unnecessary waste of money. That's another reason one carries a sling rope and snap link. Which means the US mil is Certain to buy it.
@@grampydeathblade2217 I never claimed was or wasn't a waste.
Nice development of arms, no money in peace
And it takes AA batteries to so when you run out of batteries for your radio and Disk player just take some of the militaries batteries and you got music on the battlefield
All these devices are great and give the military and police great advantages. The problem is our government is becoming completely untrustworthy and I have no doubt that the government we have right now would use these technologies against US citizens if we don’t comply with their demands.
They couldn't even get the Poncho to work right now they are finally doing something about it great job
Wonder if some of the more complicated systems will ever be actually used in combat.
Saw stuff with the water and explosive stuff years ago. The guy who created it made other stuff to render unexploded artillery shells safe with small shaped charges and many other innovations. They even made a type of bangalor torpedo, they called the bangalor blade, to deal with concertina wire and it was quite impressive.
The idea of drones for search & rescue is very interesting.
3rd Arm, wasn't that a similar tech we saw in Aliens?
I'm wondering if it's "needed" because current & future recruits are to feeble to do what others have done for multiple generations...hold it themselves.
@@LongWalkerActual In which case, a very subtle change in evolution? I would imagine that America's military would try beef up recruits so as to not rely on liable tech if the shit hits the fan. The intended purpose of advancing military tech is to augment and enhance performance, not become a handicap.
That is what I thought
Soldiers are no longer soldiers but machine operators. F they love war so much have man to man combat its fairer, or better still let the leaders fight it out one on one, losers that country has whatever they went to war about like oil gas cobalt.though why do our governments start wars to take resources that are not theirs to take buy the things you won’t instead of killing millions or billions to get what isn’t your or in your lands, it’s evil, greed envy and hate, none will get to heaven, stop using the name of God to do your evil deeds.
Easibridge. Omg! I was an engineer in a guard bridge unit. We built ( man carried components) 60 ton load class medium girder bridge, one lane bridges with link reinforcement. Scaled way down i still see similarities between that and the easibridge.
18:31 Arcas is an old piece of tec that has been used for more than 10 years.
All of this Cool Whiz Bang equipment makes War fun! Never mind the blood the guts and the death. What really matters are the cool toys.
7:40 Why are our Police suited up like they are going to invade a foreign country?
"Reaper" screams 'defensive' doesn't it?
I saw the Third Arm used somewhat effectively by the Marines on LV-426 against the aliens. 😅
I want one of those drones that carries people
The mobile shields to crawl behind failed spectacularly in WW1
It was made of cheap metal
@user-xg5vr9ry6z
Would that matter when a person's legs are still visible to target?
@@JeanLouisSlezak it was a flawed concept.
Drones are the best strategic weapon.
Without war you can't have peace...
I like dimensions described in feet inches and MPH..
You must have a lot of trust to let someone fly you around like that
That's way more than enough payload that making it autonomous is a rounding error.
Spacex lands a 20-story building on a boat in the ocean, using a hover slam. The amount of failed landings has become exceedingly rare.
Maximum 5 lb of hardware to give it a thousand times more brains than a Falcon 9 first stage.
I think the best use for this technology is using them instead of a parachute. Probably get away with something a quarter the size. Then the soldier also has a personal drone for whatever you want to use it for.
I want one in a bicopter backpack format. Used in conjunction with powered roller blades. The idea is to maximize autonomous stability.
It wouldn't need a someone. They fly em selves these days. The DJI camera drones ya can buy or awesome. They can follow you or fly a designated pre programmed path ya draw on ya phone and then "return to home" to the point they took off from to within a few inches using GPS. And they have awesome obstacle avoidance so they don't crash into trees, buildings or people etc. And that's all for just a $1000 to $2000. So of course the military ones would be just as good or better.🤷♂
Happens now with manned aircraft.
I want one of those drones just to go to the store,. Am I wrong, drop your kid off at school,, no, just me...
🤣🤣🍻
Mtfp. Would be great of ot could make the truck itself bulletproof lol
The Battlefield a Deep Dark Desolate Place God forgive me I love it!!!!!!
WTF..LOVE THE FIRST ONE
Noticed on footage from Ukraine a leather device had a back piece of leather about 4ft by 2ft with strap, at bottom was attached like a leather bucket, im guessing the feet go into bucket area the wounded soldier lies back on the leather back piece were he probably gets fastened to this device, if it had two straps for your arms like a back pack yes you could carry a wounded person and fire your assault rifle, now this leather device could be something different but common sense says it's for extracting the wounded.
I can see that MTFP could be very handy for a lost of police station and In bad countries
Ukraine needs some of these .
Good luck bad guys!!
Bit excessive just to open a van !
plenty good money to be made by suppling the troops with the tools of the trade !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
People can't make money off of peace
I never needed any of these......
Would not work in jungle warfare
Make helmet that takes batteries and make it so they can be swapped out with a container holding the batteries quickly in the heat of battle all six plug and play and they can reload batteries after in a safe place if you can find one on the battlefield of today swappable battery pack and everyone should have one total battery replacement packs on them
How about a system that can use ANY small battery?!
Brilliant!!
thank you . ( 2024 / July / 16 )
Lose the music and calm down the narrator. Wow! What mess!
Develope tech for peace not war
If you really want peace you had better prepare for war.
Peace, like all things needs to be maintained. You maintain peace with weapons. An armed society is a polite society.
There is no peace without preparation for war..
So in your low IQ world we are supposed to stop making weapons whilst enemies continue to do so so that when conflicts happen we are woefully under gunned and overmatched? Horrible and frankly a childish response.
“ SI VIS PACEM PARABELLUM “
You cant tell if something of shown is reliable if it not use widenly in Ukraine. Otherwise it is either too expensive, too nishe or can be replased with more cheap solutions.
Easy bridge make the rungs wider so a Infantry soldier can walk across with a full combat load and why it's better to make each rung wider you don't want to cross on all fours unless you are under fire from the other side of the bridge good luck I've already done my service to America unless some joker from another Country pisses me off at 64 I can pop the head and throat with a M16 A2 with iron sights at Four hundred meters and if I had time to work with the newest assault rifle America came out with even better but I believe that America made a big mistake not using Bull pup design because it puts the weight of the weapon on the shoulder of the soldiers and keeps a full length barrel but shortens the overall length of the weapon it should have a grenade launcher under the barrel but keep everything else the rifle has the rounds and sighting system and then we would be cooking with gas and I will never understand why they don't have veterans to help in design of weapons systems because a lot of the time a soldier will come out with the best way to do things not a bunch of officers who are shinning the chairs in the Pentagon with their asses and start listening to soldiers they would tell us if we came up with something good that we would get money not this lifetime
Seems like everywhere I go on UA-cam I can't get away from this annoying commentator..
.