XK A160 (J3-Cub Part 1)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 6 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 20

  •  6 місяців тому +3

    I had been interested in this model for months, got an amazing price on one and ordered it. I have the Cessna 182 f949s pro which is much simpler but is a very fun and practical little plane to use. I find it very convenient how easy it is to fly these WLtoys planes, and due to its size, you also don't need to go to a giant field to fly.

    • @eljaibas16
      @eljaibas16 5 місяців тому +2

      How does it fly? I've seen some videos where the rudder gets glitchy and causes the plane to stall and crash. I bought it, just waiting for it to arrive.

    •  5 місяців тому +4

      I think the rudder problem was in the first versions, if you notice there are only videos over 2 or 3 years old that talk about it. I didn't have any problems with mine in that sense, but I found the gyro a little annoying. I notice that the rudder moves very little with input from the control, it moves more due to the mixing of the ailerons.

    • @eljaibas16
      @eljaibas16 5 місяців тому +1

      @ ah I see, you are right. Well I hope they don't send me old stock, since I got it kind of cheap (less than 50USD).

    • @russellbowden583
      @russellbowden583 4 місяці тому +1

      This is great feedback. I've also noticed these are all in old videos but had been put off so far because of this!

    • @FordMaverickFanatic
      @FordMaverickFanatic 3 місяці тому

      ​@@eljaibas16Any updates? I'm considering one as well.

  • @goochma
    @goochma 7 місяців тому +2

    What a nice little plane.

  • @robsonmenezes1006
    @robsonmenezes1006 4 місяці тому +2

    Muito bom o vídeo, amigo está bem realista,um bom aeromodelo.👍👍😍🤩

    • @HappyRCFlyer
      @HappyRCFlyer  Місяць тому

      Thank you and I agree! 👍🏼 Very detailed and great price for RTF! 😃

  • @matthewmann8951
    @matthewmann8951 16 днів тому

    Not a bad plane looking wise but the electronics are a little bit on the don't work at all side but one crashed it took it apart put any plant motor in it deeplight electronics flies awesome I would never pay $170 for this plan never I wouldn't pay $75 for this plan I wouldn't pay $50 for this plane although I did pay $50 for this plane it still was a dismal failure Hope you had better luck with yours Peace brother.

  • @happymcslappy3640
    @happymcslappy3640 7 місяців тому

    Vey well spoken!!

  • @weseehowcommiegoogleis3770
    @weseehowcommiegoogleis3770 4 місяці тому +1

    I think most have a Misunderstanding what the Term SCALE even means! It's a percentage ratio of the full size model Nothing more!

    • @HappyRCFlyer
      @HappyRCFlyer  Місяць тому

      Hey, thanks for sharing your thoughts and taking the time to leave a comment! 😃👍🏼
      The word Scale could mean something different to different people. 🤔
      To some it means the range of musical notes from low to high..🎶
      To others it means a device for measuring weight...⚖️
      To others it means the small panels of armored skin found on some fish and reptiles...🐍
      But to the R/C Community it actually means equipped with features to make it look realistic! 🛩
      If you get the chance to attend a "Scale RC Event" (I did last Friday🤩)you will find a collection of varying sizes of what appears to be realistic looking Radio Controlled either Vehicles, Watercraft, or Aircraft!
      Some people might even custom build or buy what is known as "Scale RC's" and it may not even be known or referred to as what size they are.
      But the 1st place prize goes to the Aircraft with the most realistic looking paint job, added details such as antenna or flight number markings, ect.. it actually doesn't have much to do with what size the Vehicle or Aircraft is other than if there are alot of one size than they may group them all into a separate category and the judges may choose to organize them with others of the same size.
      So it probably just depends on who you are talking to or what you want it to mean. 🙂
      When I mentioned that this plane is more scale than most UMX planes, I mean it has features like, spinner and simulated engine cawling details, clear windows with skylight, wheel/tires combo like a real J3, spring/strut landing gear, interior instrument panels and pilots seat... etc..
      Anyways, I hope that makes more sense and trust you will consider Subscribing 👍🏼to see and learn more about RC Fun! 😃

  • @ShahryarSaigol
    @ShahryarSaigol 6 місяців тому +1

    5 channel? 1Rudder, 2elevator, 3aileron, 4throttle. 5?

    • @jantjejansen
      @jantjejansen 6 місяців тому +6

      Gyro/3D mode controll.

    • @HappyRCFlyer
      @HappyRCFlyer  Місяць тому

      @ShahryarSaigol, Great Question! 👍🏼
      Yes, its generally Ch1-Throttle, Ch2-Ailrons, Ch3-Elevator, Ch4-Rudder, and Ch5-Flight Modes switch!
      And Thanks @JantjeJansen for your comment! 👍🏼

  • @Wings_of_foam
    @Wings_of_foam 7 місяців тому

    XK planes are great, but let's be honest. The transmitter is absolutely garbage!

    • @blasceras
      @blasceras 3 місяці тому +1

      can i use my own radiomaster with this ? how =? i havent used it yet

    • @theoztreecrasher2647
      @theoztreecrasher2647 2 місяці тому

      @@blasceras Yep. V911S/E119 should do it if you have the new version with the S-bus and DSM sockets on the board. Or just add a satellite receiver of your choice to suit your hobby-grade transmitter as described in the extra note inserted with the manual.
      The original version released used a different protocol and had some bad programming on the flight board that caused many crashes.