I like Ne5 against an early Bg4. I've had a similar position with white with the moves Nc3 and Nf6 included, and I failed to play Ne5 (and had a miserable time in the opening, idk if I won or lost that game). After looking at an engine afterwards, I found Ne5 is a nice, forcing way to threaten to grab the bishop pair.
Thank you for the input! Nc3 and Nf6 involved would make only white's chances better than usual, cause of the greater possibilities of the c3 knight over the one on f3 (in case black doesn't capture on c4) - putting pressure against the d5-pawn; possible jump to b5 after c4xd5 and c6xd5; clearing the Q-side in order to involve the a1-rook potentially on the c-file, etc. Against an early Bc8-g4 playing Nf3-e5 is excellent. If you can find the game, feel free to paste the PGN here, as I am planning a video on my viewers games. 🙂
I would play Ne5 against Bg4. Great video! This is the kind of content an 1800 rated player like myself likes to see. Books with opening theory always seem to lead to positions with a slight advantage or equality after a lot of moves. They never focus on how a master punishes a lower rated player for mixing up the move order.
Thanks! I've seen many of about 2000 rating points (FIDE) who wouldn't know to use the Qb3 idea against early Bf5 move, and possibly miss the Ne5 against an early Bg4. That's how I've got the idea to record a video on that topic 🙂
I like Ne5 against an early Bg4. I've had a similar position with white with the moves Nc3 and Nf6 included, and I failed to play Ne5 (and had a miserable time in the opening, idk if I won or lost that game). After looking at an engine afterwards, I found Ne5 is a nice, forcing way to threaten to grab the bishop pair.
Thank you for the input! Nc3 and Nf6 involved would make only white's chances better than usual, cause of the greater possibilities of the c3 knight over the one on f3 (in case black doesn't capture on c4) - putting pressure against the d5-pawn; possible jump to b5 after c4xd5 and c6xd5; clearing the Q-side in order to involve the a1-rook potentially on the c-file, etc. Against an early Bc8-g4 playing Nf3-e5 is excellent.
If you can find the game, feel free to paste the PGN here, as I am planning a video on my viewers games. 🙂
@@BadBishopChess Here's the game in question: 1. d4 d5 2. c4 c6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. Nf3 Bg4 5. Bg5 Nbd7 6. Ne5 Nxe5 7. dxe5 Ne4 8.
Nxe4 dxe4 9. g3 Qxd1+ 10. Rxd1 h6 11. Be3 e6 12. Bg2 Bf5 13. c5 Be7 14. b4 Rd8
15. O-O Rxd1 16. Rxd1 O-O 17. Rd4 Rd8 18. Rxd8+ Bxd8 19. f3 exf3 20. exf3 a5 21.
a3 axb4 22. axb4 Bd3 23. Kf2 f6 24. Bd4 f5 25. Ke3 Bb5 26. f4 g5 27. Bf3 g4 28.
Bd1 h5 29. Bb3 Kf7 30. Kf2 h4 31. Ke3 hxg3 32. hxg3 Ke7 33. Kd2 Kd7 34. Ke3 Be7
35. Kd2 1/2-1/2
As a bonus, here's another game after I learned about Ne5 vs Bg4 that I won in 11 moves: 1. d4 d5 2. c4 c6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. Nf3 Bg4 5. Ne5 dxc4 6. Nxg4 Nxg4 7. e4 b5 8.
Qxg4 b4 9. Na4 Qxd4 10. Be3 Qe5 11. Qc8# 1-0
Thank you! I am interested in using one of these two for the potential video. 👌
I would play Ne5 against Bg4. Great video! This is the kind of content an 1800 rated player like myself likes to see. Books with opening theory always seem to lead to positions with a slight advantage or equality after a lot of moves. They never focus on how a master punishes a lower rated player for mixing up the move order.
Thanks! I've seen many of about 2000 rating points (FIDE) who wouldn't know to use the Qb3 idea against early Bf5 move, and possibly miss the Ne5 against an early Bg4. That's how I've got the idea to record a video on that topic 🙂
Wanna play me sometime?
@Geelse_zot
This is another brilliant video! Understanding beats memorization every single time!! Thanks :)
love your lesson
Can you plz do a slav speed run.
Or c6 speed run. That way u can play both caro and slav