DIALOGUE: Are Protestants Too Skeptical? (w/Gospel Simplicity)
Вставка
- Опубліковано 28 чер 2024
- In this episode Trent sits down with Protestant UA-camr Austin of @GospelSimplicity to discuss his investigation into Catholicism and whether Protestantism should be the "default" position for non-Catholics.
To support this channel: / counseloftrent
Gospel Simplicity: / @gospelsimplicity
00:00:00 - Intro
00:04:40 - Austin on his channel
00:09:20 - Why is he still engaging with Protestantism?
00:13:40 - Austin's difficulties with Orthodoxy or Catholicism
00:21:00 - Which has more evidence, the Ascension or the Resurrection of Christ?
00:23:00 - Trent’s primary challenges with Protestantism
00:26:30 - Austin on Trent’s difficulties (Sola Scriptura, etc…)
00:32:00 - What are the dogmatic hurdles for Protestantism?
00:33:30 - The Pauline authorship of the Pastoral Epistles
00:35:30 - Difficulties with the Assumption
00:41:00 - Jesus rising from the dead and the Assumption
00:42:30 - Does converting to the faith mean you have to be able to refute every difficulty?
00:44:00 - The Authority of Your Faith
00:48:00 - Is Faith an all-or-nothing thing?
00:57:40 - Salvation outside of the Church
00:59:30 - Do Catholics argue like atheists? - Розваги
Thanks for having me on the channel, Trent! It was an absolute pleasure.
Is Austin still not Catholic. (I jest) We are praying for you Austin, brother. PAX
Lord bless u Austin, I know u did a lot of traveling in one day back & forth for this interview with Trent. Shows u are willing to sacrifice your own time to learn something new whatever that may be...
And that's all we can ask for, is for someone to be open minded, to learn more knowledge small or great. Bc we are all biased in some ways with the presuppositions we hold to we just can't help it we're all sinners finite creatures. Of course that's why we can't know God's thoughts, or his ways Isaiah 55:8; it only could be passed down.
So these sacrifices shows a lot about your character to learn the fullness of the truth.
God will always keep blessing a person who is still willing to listen to more knowledge. To hear 1st, to learn 2nd to be slow to speak. As we can grow in Grace 2 Peter 3:18...
@onlylove556 Totally agree AMEN it's great when someone like @Austin is willing to listen and dig in, learn & search. GOD Bless you @Austin
God bless you 🙏 awesome convo
@@robertotapia8086 Amen📿🌹🙏🏼💪🏼
Ayy I was in that studio recently! Glad two of my favorite youtubers got to talk
As a Catholic, I enjoy your vids despite having vastly different point of views. Please keep it up and don't get discouraged by the hate you receive. God bless!
@@TokenWhiteGuyAGRbased catholic
Convert to the one true faith
NGL I paid more attention to your tier list than your well thought out discussions. I’d watch even a vegetable ranking tier list. 😂
@@zacharyahearn4069 redeemed zoomer tier list of “foods god loves the most” would be great
“According to the Westminster confession of faith, it is plainly obvious to see that the broccoli should be above the carrot”
As a convert, being convinced of the Church's authority and the eucharist is what sealed the deal for me. There are things about the Catholic faith I might not fully understand, but I don't need too. Letting go of trying to be convinced of every detail was incredibly freeing. Being able to lean on the Church so I can live my faith, and not have to figure the faith out all by myself instead, is such a gift. Skepticism exists in all forms of Christianity, that's what the grace of faith is for. I love our Lords Bride. I love being Catholic, and that love grows daily. I can't imagine life as a non catholic ever again.
Inspirador! 🙏👍
"Scripture is clear" dudes always real quiet when they read John 6
I'm a revert I'm a cradle Catholic who walked away and in my late 30s started truly looking for GOD but was persuaded by the worship style of the carismatic protestantes and the zeal. As I started learning more of which protestante denomination to join I realized the true Church was the Catholic Church thank you Jesus. 🙏🏼
100%
As a current baptist, I'm about to join the RCIA because of these very reasons. The early Christians believed in real presence. Even Martin Luther did lol
It’s ironic that Austin was one of the people that led me to decide to be Catholic after his video touring St. John Cantius.
I feel like God uses these Christian UA-camrs, who just explore different denominations, etc but don’t necessarily convert themselves, to lead others to Christ in his apostolic churches ❤
@@SMV1199 Odd question, are you Eastern Orthodox, Assyrian Church of the East, or neither?
Literally the same. He was doing a video with Trent and Trent laughed at him for going to Cantius since it was "traditional." 9 months ago, I had never even stepped in a Cathedral before. But my Presbyterian church is down the road from Cantius so I spontaneously went to their Latin Novus Ordo the next day.
I watched Austin's reaction video on the way home and had the same thoughts (e.g. being scandalized by the short homily and young kids in the pews). I almost didn't go in because the Latin chanting sounded so cultish and I almost left during the homily because of the incense. But I stayed to the end and the reverence spoke to me. I've gone to Cantius ever since and will be confirmed in 2 weeks!
Austin and Gavin Ortlund were very important in my conversion to Orthodoxy, Ortlund particularly.
@@sivad1025How are kids in church scandalizing? I can get the short homily being odd to someone who isn’t fully aware of Eucharistic theology and is used to the sermon being the focus
The Holy Spirit dwells in the catholic church since 33AD and guides her to all truth!
Then why does it keep changing ?
I pray you repent
Logically Jesus Christ created a visible, hierarchical, one, holy, catholic and apostolic church and he is the head of the body, the church. The church is also Christs bride. One body. One bride.
Jesus also called for unity in John 17 in his church.
Jesus promised in John14:26 But the Advocate, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in my name, will teach you all things and will remind you of everything I have said to you.
And Jesus added to His promise, John16:13 But when the Spirit of truth comes, he will lead you into all truth. He will not speak his own words, but he will speak only what he hears, and he will tell you what is to come.
Then the inspired author wrote in 1Tim3:15 if I am delayed, you may know how one ought to behave in the household of God, which is the church of the living God, the pillar and bulwark of the truth.
Jesus created and has maintained his Catholic Church for two millennia, Mat28: 18 And Jesus came and said to them, “All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me. 19 Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, 20 teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you; and lo, I am with you always, to the close of the age.”
That's basically the gist that most protestants that I've encountered suggest when they say something like "just sit down and read the Bible and ask the Holy Spirit to guide you."
I always like to reply to that with, "yeah, I did that already and I'm Catholic...so now what?"
I was anti-Catholic 10 months ago but will be confirmed in 2 weeks (Austin and Trent were both pivotal!). And I've had both Catholics and Protestants throughout the year tell me to stop using my brain so much and to let my heart speak. It always made me laugh when a Protestant said that because all I could think was, "You realize my head is the only thing standing in the way of Catholicism, right"? The Protestant church is not even close to beauty of the Catholic Church's art and philosophy and certainly not the reverence. And I've had so many providential signs pointing to the church.
All these Protestants who want to "follow your heart" or "follow the spirit" I don't think have ever actually taken thr Catholic church seriously
That is also how the LDS missionaries tell me that I can know with certainty that that their church and their scriptures are correct. If this is actually the manner that the Holy Spirit acts in when guiding us to all truth, then there's a problem because I can't get get a clear explanation as to why other people believe that the Holy Spirit have lead them with certainty to other churches and entirely different religions.
That's just bad/misguided Protestant advice
@@FassnightI agree: because when you don't have the Holy Spirit then other Spirit's can impersonate the Holy Spirit and lead you into false religion: instead of the true relationship to God that you need.
You have to repent and accept Christ as your Savior: NOT a church as your Savior: Mormons and Catholics R saying the same thing about their own theology as being the only True church: God gives his Salvation to whom He wishes in response to Repentance and isn't limited to a particular church.
@@davidjanbaz7728And how do you know all that? How do you define 'church'? How do you define 'repentance'?
What you're doing here is you're trying to push your own theology yet you're basing other religions for doing exactly the same!
Protestant here. Appreciate all of your videos Trent. It's helped me overcome some of the anti Catholic bias I was taught as a kid. It's pretty clear to me that Catholics and Protestants are ultimately two sides of the same coin. Meaning that at our core and to overly simplify things, we love Jesus and can't wait to get to Heaven to be with Him. There's obviously some discrepancy in the exact way we get there but I think we are all going. I know many here might disagree with me and that's ok. I love my Catholic brothers and sisters and cannot wait to meet all of you in Heaven!
I love that you are talking to non-Catholics on video.
To non Christians!
@@davido3026 even by our own standards they’re Christian. They’re just in an imperfect communion with the Body
@@davido3026 Objectively false according to our Catechism.
Wouldn’t it be nice if we could just “skip UA-cam” and do this in person? UA-cam has a way of censoring so much, that I’m not even sure this message will make it to you.
@@davido3026Rad Trad alert!
Keep up the good work Trent, love from South Korea 🇰🇷
2027
@@luizeventos6414World youth day ?
그리스도 안의 친구여, 안녕하세요!
Trent, these dialogue videos are excellent. It's so great to see Catholic content that isn't debate or "own the Protestants "stuff.
Facts but his debates and rebuttals are *chefs kiss*
I like the debates more tbh.
@@domanicvaldez oh they are awesome, for sure. It's just nice to see some more relaxed content, as so many apologists stick with debates, or end up doing long form Joe Rogan stuff.
@@spiderdxn2263 100% I do like the mix up of content!
I remember watching Gavin Ortlund, Austin, Cooper and slowly starting to watch Trent and the other brothers and not knowing what to do. It was that "in a gap" situation where you dont fit into any tradition. Rlly a challenging place to be. Thats around a yr ago. I remember stumbling over Austins video, where he is touring a catholic church and being guided by a friendly priest. I was so amazed by the beauty and the depth in the catholic faith, that i couldnt resist to start seriously thinking about going back to the catholic church after 14/15 years in evangelicalism. A few months later i went to confession and since then im so happy, being in the catholic church and seeing its depth and beauty with a heart, that loves the bible, loves Christ and loves the church.
Today im so thankful and happy, that God was carrying me through the dark valley. And i know many viewers are in that same "in between" situation where they can sometimes feel kinda lost. I want to encourage you: keep praying, keep crying, keep holding on to Jesus and he will help you out! Thanks Trent and thanks Austin for your great work.
God bless you!
Welcome home!
Welcome! We love that you are with us 🥰🫶🏼🕊️🙏🏼✝️
Trent! I love your mission of dialoging with protestants. Austin is wonderful. I would love to see Matt Whitman and Ruslan on your channel as well!
I'll second Matt Whitman
Agree AMEN @Matt Whitman , @Ruslan & @Gavin Ortlund please 🙏🏼 there willing to listen. Robert from Puerto Rico 🇵🇷
I'd love to see both of those too.
@@KevinOfClay Matt is great, I completely agree.
Oh! And Anna from @MerelyChristian would be excellent to talk to as well.
As former Baptist minister, I think Austin is in the best place right now. He still thinks like a Protestant with regard to which beliefs are to be accepted. For example, he states, “did the apostles teach this?” This is another way of saying, “show me that in the Bible”. As he has time to reflect on what the nature of the church is, and by a gentle wind from the Holy Spirit, I’m sure he will be ready to make the change God calls us all to.
May God Bless you, Austin
Wouldn't it be important to know what the Apostles taught ?
@@TheAegis1000 Is that a serious question?
it is always refreshing to see Austin. It gets exhausting listening to christian UA-camrs that you otherwise enjoy talk about Catholicism like it's a disease.
Catholics are the first Christians, the others protest against Christ and his church!!
I attended Protestant churches in my youth and really loved the friendliness and community, which was non-existent at my Catholic parish, but every time I thought about definitively leaving Catholicism, I just couldn't cut off Mary and the saints. Even though I wasn't paying much attention to my "Mama" and "relatives" I just couldn't turn my back and leave them. That's one of the most important aspects of Catholicism to me: it's a family: a Father, older Brother, Mother, and so many siblings and cousins and aunts and uncles and grandparents and and and...!!!
Second this perspective!
Real question - what does it mean for you to "cut off" Mary and the saints? They're still your brothers and sisters in heaven (Mary isn't your mother but still). Maybe it's more important to find community on earth among those currently living in faith than holding on to a relationship with those who you can't commune with now but will later? Jesus wants you to live for Him, and you can't do that unless you are among an actual family of believers, not an institution with no real soul.
When Christian Rome took over pagan Rome. They replaced a lot of the pagan traditions with Christian traditions. For example, they had a matriarchal goddess and all of the gods that were under them. That was replaced with Mary and the Saints.
You have the holy Catholic Church. You have 48,000 protestant CULTS
@@simonslater9024 cults follow leaders and obey whatever they say. Hmmm who is the Pope of the Protestants? And also sweetie you need to read. There aren’t 48K denominations. And you have just as many splinters of Catholics and orthodox believers. Just because you agree in unison to a group or view doesn’t make it wrong. Try again honey.
I love Austin! This is such a wonderful example of how an interdenominational dialogue should occur.
Catholicism is the Christian faith, not a denomination!!!
Where i live, Protestants are definitely the vast majority. It’s painful how ignorant everyone around me is of church history. Almost all my friends and have family have tried to save me from the pagan religion ive been lost to. Theyve just never really been pushed on theology at all and have made it a personal mission to ignore any historical information.
I have lots of pastors and lay speakers in my family, they all think the king james bible fell from heaven in all it’s 66 book glory. The problem is when they come at me it’s like i use history, scripture, and logic and they think satan is playing a trick on both of us. They incredibly nonsensical things, they say things like “jesus didnt come here to start a religion, all christians are the true church, just not these” and then proceed to list every denomination they can think of from amish to zionists. It really sucks that the most ignorant sects of Christianity where i live, are the default just by majority.
I'm finding continuously using John 6 the bread of life discourse to show Jesus rejecting believes who didn't accept the teaching, and also acts, mostly the whole of acts but specifically chapter 1 to show apostolic succession.
Yes. After seeing car-crashes like the atheist channel “Mindshift”, I completely agree with you, and see the damages that Protestantism can do on people who don’t have a solid cultural background.
@@DavidTheZealot My best friend has probably been catholic answers, they have a playlist on youtube of short videos with a general explanation of almost every conceivable topic related to the faith. They have articles to match on their website and i have found them to be very helpful. I get angry and frustrated with using a sola scriptura style defense though. They ask me for bible passages, i give them the passage, then they change topics and want to know where this or that is in the bible. I work my butt off to show them again and again. They just get mad at me and cease conversation. Literally, it’s ended friendships and familial relationships just showing them the verses. As i said, many of them are pastors and they take their status as an authority for interpretation. They say things like “ive been leading a flock for decades! Ive never seen someone say the woman in revelation is MARY!” I know he’s totally ignorant of history or cultures outside our own. Its hard to debate without offending them. I really see why Jesus didnt even convince all of his family of the truth. People’s traditions get ingrained
Oh sola scriptura, my favorite, the self refuting doctrine haha. Nowhere in the bible does it say it HAS to be said in the bible. They are crazy just stay for them and know I'm having the same interactions brother
@@DavidTheZealot Thanks, nice to know im not alone. I’ve really tried to get them to look into the miracles of the church or the history but they pull an ostrich every time on that.
Nice I’m so pumped for inter-Christian dialogue, it was definitely a helpful resource for my conversion to Catholicism
My wife and I recently converted to Orthodoxy from cradle evangelical Protestantism. I was a seminary educated Baptist minister and deacon, so our journey towards the ancient church has been a huge shift both theologically and culturally. On this journey I have enjoyed listening to both Trent and Austin. They are both so genuine and their content so well-researched and presented. I feel like I’m friends with both of you. Ultimately, I hope that they are both able to reach many more people with the love of Christ.
I was agnostic and looking through the ecumenical councils and early fathers I did not see Sola scriptura, Eternal security, Sola fide. Like Trent Horn said I saw more evidence for Catholic claims. I converted to the Catholic Church in 1997.
Cool!!! I converted in 1996 after a Tim Staples Defending The Faith 6 week seminar.
Did you see Purgatory, Marian dogmas or Papal Infallibility and Supremacy?
I didn’t see it either. But sola fide, I see in the Bible. There are like 10 explicit scriptures. There’s more scriptures on sola fide than Mary’s assumption - which has no scripture at all. And even the earliest church fathers said nothing about Mary’s assumption.
I don't think there is anything more than a semantic disagreement between protestants and Catholics on sola fide. @@ntlearning
@@AquinasBasedYes I would agree with that.
Dialogue with younger UA-camrs is such a great idea, thanks for sharing these discussions ❤️
Looking forward to this, Austin is good people.
as an occasional popper in, catholic curious, these conversations are great. much preferred to debates or trying to score points. please keep it up.
You do great work Trent. Don’t worry about the studio. In my humble view I would watch even if you sat on folding chairs with a white background and a small sign saying “forgoing fancy studio to give alms.” or “small studio, big heart.” 😊. But if you really feel you need one.
I love listening to Trent❤
I really appreciate you doing these dialogs with these young guys like Gospel Simplicity and Redeemed Zoomer, and having a very noncombative and gentle spirit while you do it. You love to see it.
Trent has been praying more recently
Awesome to see two Christians sit down and respectfully talk shop.
This was a great conversation Trent!
This was absolutely great. God bless you Trent and Austin.
I love this! What a beautiful dialogue. I am a recent convert (will be confirmed this Easter). I am so thankful for all that you do, Trent. It has been a great help for me as I have considered many of the questions Austin has. :)
God bless your journey
Yay! Glad to see you, Austin! Thank you, Trent! Excellent discussion!
This was a very thoughtful and thought-provoking discussion! God bless you both.
Excellent conversation!
Austin is great. Good chat
Absolutely love these conversational type videos! Looking forward to more!
Love these two together! Just brilliant!
Thanks to both of you. I really like Austin’s heart and the way he communicates. He describes our thoughts as well as we are from the Protestant church and struggling with some of what Austin mentions. Trent, I liked hearing you in this setting. You were much more gracious in your discussion with Austin and I think this is a much better way for Catholics and Protestants to talk to one another - with kindness. This is one of my favorite videos. Thanks to both of you.
I like this format a lot
Fantastic conversation!
Looking forward to the fancy studio
Thanks Trent and Austin! I enjoyed this conversation
Wonderful conversation. Love from 🇿🇦
I like the discussion format. I hope this continues.
Agreed. The in-person conversation makes a big difference I think
Looking forward to this dialogue. I’ve checked out Austin’s channel in the past, and I recall him looking into Catholicism, which mirrored my experience as well.
Fascinating debate! Well done gentleman!
Love both you guys!
Austin is such a nice guy! Great for having him on, Trent!
(But Trent, if your going to do these Pints with Aquinas-style interviews, please upgrade your camera gear eventually) 😇
This is his temporary office, he is upgrading his office space currently. That's what he said on his last video I believe.
Personally, I like the stripped-down look! But whatever keeps the audio good, I'll go with it!
@@domanicvaldez Ah, great!
@@bookishbrendan8875 amen.
@@domanicvaldezMy understanding is that it is the permanent office. He just wants to kit it out
I am loving the dialogues between you and various Protestants! I’m not brainy enough to always understand what is happening in your debates. So these are great!
Really appreciate this discussion.
7:19 this is unironically why there needs to be some sort of imprimatur for those who speak about the catholic faith online
Democracy has some severe drawbacks
Catholics have always had the freedom to share their ideas. Be it through books, articles, or now with the internet. There has never been the need to put an imprimatur over EVERYTHING.
What we need is to understand the difference between the Church's authority (Bishops in union with the Bishop of Rome) and the rest of us. Only the Bishops (in union with the Bishop of Rome) have AUTHORITY, the rest of us can though share our opinions freely.
@@GustavoAndresHerrera even if it were the case that we were always free to share our ideas (which it isn’t, nor should it be), there are influential laypeople with a reach beyond anything the church has seen before who act with de facto authority. when you have laypeople with a reach not ever seen before sowing dissent and schism, and undermining the Church's authority, She must reassert the authority granted to Her by Christ. all informal authorities must me formalized in one direction or another, either by affirmation or denial of authority. it doesn't have to be a literal imprimatur. there are analogous mechanisms in place already, they should just be expanded to include individuals.
@@fcatulo I understand your point, but I think where we disagree is that I don't see Matt Frad, or Trent Horn as "authorities", nor I see them claiming any authority.
Perhaps if we use the word "influence" that'd bring us closer?
It has always been the case that you have authors having influence over society at large (think Chesterton, C.S. Lewis, etc.) without imprimatur.
To re-iterate: "authority" needs imprimatur, but "influence" does not.
@@GustavoAndresHerrera yes, I think influence accurately describes it. And they don’t claim authority but they have some de facto authority due to them being influential. The thing is that while there have been influential laypeople in the past, the technological limitations of their times made it hard for them to do a lot of damage in a short period of time in the way that social media allows today. Imprimatur began in response to the printing press. We are at another revolution in the means of communication, probably as big as the printing press. And just like back then, the Church ought to respond accordingly.
Great conversation. To me, the Assumption of Mary makes perfect sense from an intellectual and spiritual stand point. Why would God the Father and God the Son leave the beautiful, pure Ark of the Covenant in the flesh on earth to possibly be desecrated ?
You are both awesome. Thank you!
Thank you - it was very helpful - God bless 🙏
I love Austins curiosity. Its great to read about other churches and traditions. I also learn from many ex-Orthodox and ex-Catholics in my Church.
God bless you! May God draw you to Him...
I love your channel, thanks for everything you do for our Catholic church. 🙏🙏❤️❤️
Great convo 😊
I think it would’ve been interesting to bring up Marcion of Sinope who held mostly only to the Pauline Epistles. I think Protestants would have a hard time condemning him.
I'm finding some protestants are only quoting Paul! Even giving his letters primacy over the words of Jesus!
Marcion's Canon featured an early shorter version of Luke (without the infancy story) and the Pauline Epistles. No Old Testament books at all. It's funny, but once we start reading the writings of early Church Fathers ("Patristics"), biblical Canonicity becomes a boring topic. FWIW, I'm not "against" the OT or the NT canon. There's just additional important works to study alongside canonical books. The limits of translation is just as big a problem as Canonicity. @@jackieo8693
@@jackieo8693Obviously Marcion was a heretic - you can't have the story of Christ without the Hebrew scriptures. As a baptist studying theology at a protestant-based Bible school.
I love this dude and how he talks
Loving this Alex O'Conner route with the Channel, having conversations with all various sorts of people, and not just an echo chamber, looking forward to more!
These dialogue videos are great!
I'd love for you to have a discussion like this with Dan McCellen, or Dr Joshua Bowen. A non-combative dialogue with a popular well credentialed "secular" scholar (not an apologist).
I have never gotten how protestants contend with matters of authority and history particularly when it comes to the semantics of the Bible. I thought surely no one can really think they don't have a tradition particularly for interpreting the Bible. Ink on a page doesn't contain semantic content. But they do have their traditions and authorities, they just don't call them that. That kind of treatment of obscuring what is actually happening with rhetoric is very dangerous, and was part of the problem with the protestant revolutionaries in the first place. Tradition by any other name is still tradition. They would set up a false dichotomy about them vs the Church when in fact they had some of the same qualities but just weren't justifying those qualities. The Church could say of course we have authority and tradition, and here's how it goes back to Christ.
Really appreciate Austin. We cradle Catholics gain so much from hearing the insights of open minded Protestants, and i thank God for all those Protestant pastors such as Hahn, Bergsma, etc who entered the Church and have brought their love of the Bible to Catholic catechesis and scholarship.
A lot of good collaborations lately!
I'm a simple man, I see a new Trent podcast, I like the video.
Trent, I’m not sure that the Dormition of Mary is up for debate. It’s certainly not infallibly taught, but it does appear to be the perennial teaching of the Church in both the East and the West. I don’t think Catholics are free to publicly dissent from it, even if it doesn’t quite rise to the level of demanding religious submission of intellect and will.
Am I way off the mark here?
Great video by the way!
Guys I’ve been stuck and so ocd over catholic Protestant issues that it’s starting to consume my life. I think people need to start making content about this.
I suggest you “fast” from that for a few weeks and focus on daily prayer and Bible reading with just enabling you to have a closer walk with Jesus each day. And then come back to this stuff trusting the Lord is with you
Hi guys - moderate high-church Anglican here, and I love watching this kind of interview.
I think it's a bit disenfranchising to suggest a person who believes in God, who knows Jesus, and who reads the Bible with their own congregation is "not interested in truth" because they don't engage in these theological dialogues about peripheral dogma. You are in danger of disqualifying a lot of people simply for being simpler than you. Isn't that like preventing children from coming to Jesus? Isn't that a discredit to the miracle of faith, to say yours is more valid because you have studied to show yourself approved? I'm glad you have confidence, but the gate is already narrow and the way hard to find, don't make it even harder for people that will be in heaven forever with you.
I'm always amazed by the extent to which Protestants choose not to be persuaded by the evidence.
In fairness (I will be confirmed in 2 weeks), I had a much higher bar for Catholicism because I believe in family continuity. My family tradition that was passed on to me is Calvinism. So to depart from my family would require evidence that I couldn't say no to. It's impossible to treat all things with the same burden of proof. At a certain point, you have to stick to one position and say this is your faith unless proven otherwise
Austin has expressed similar sentiment which I found relatable
@@sivad1025 he who is not willing to leave father, mother...
@@cultofmodernism8477 Right. But that's irrelevant to the question of burden of proof. If you're 51/49 against your parents, there's a very good chance that you're leaving both your parents AND Christ. Deference to family tradition is a good thing
@@sivad1025 Well, that's precisely my point. The Lord asks that we do not conflate the two (leaving parents vs. leaving Christ). The question Christ wants us to evaluate, in isolation, is the voracity of His Church's truth claims, apart from the emotional baggage of fidelity to your parents/culture/nation etc. In other words, first seek Christ/His Church and then later worry about how your parents will react to your conclusion.
@cultofmodernism8477 I'm not disagreeing about that. I'm talking about burden of proof. Do you require 50% confidence, 51%, 70%, 99%? That's going to change based off of your family tradition. If you're 99% confident the Catholic church is the church of Jesus, you should of course not use your parents as an excuse. But when your confidence is only 50% or even 51%, you're in a position where you could go either way in good conscience. Showing deference to your family is not a flaw when you're unsure
Wonderful conversation
Great convo
There was no such thing as Protestant (or Baptist) anywhere in the world (Europe, Africa, or Asia) before 1519.
Neither was there a Catholic before 0 A.D.
@@SneakyEmuBecause Christ hadn't come yet 😂
@@SneakyEmuAnd there is no such thing as 0 AD
@@MarvelGamer2023I don't know even know what point he was trying to make.
No Protestants??
Interesting
What about the waldenses? And the true Christian’s that we’re slaughtered by the Romans? You might say that the word Protestant doesn’t apply, but nonetheless, true Bible believing Christians were persecuted by the Roman’s and then the Catholic Church which was a continuation of the empire
The empire became a church
It is a mix of pagan and Christian theology
For me, as a convert to Catholicism from Protestantism. Christian truth and practice does not have to go back to the apostles, but they do have to be affirmed and promulgated by the church which does go back to the apostles and Christ himself.
As a protestant who's not so sure about Sola Scriptura anymore I found that dialogue very interesting. Could you speak more on how Catholics interpret the Bible and the history of Bible interpretation? Thanks
Great conversation 😁
No, no this was not good. This was supposed to be a dialog, but it became a monologue. I think Trent spoke 80% of the time. Austin was there more like a listener to a Catholic apologist lecturing on this and that. And it was very clear in most of what Trent said that he is a Catholic apologist at heart. I actually think Austin was a bit humiliated. But Austin would be too humble to admit it. I'm sure Trent is well-intentioned, but I don't think the form of dialog is his thing. He can't really handle that form. At least not this time. And what a "studio" then, sterile and boring. And the sound quality was not the best, nor was the lighting. Sorry for all the criticism, but then I'm not Catholic either.
You didn't have to tell me that you're not a Catholic. I know buddy. Neither am i btw. I did find your nit-picking kinda amusing lmao
He will make a good Catholic! Trent, you should have let Austin talk a little more, in my opinion.
This is a dialogue so they both interact together. Not really an interview.
So good video!👍🏼
Two interesting, intelligent, and educated men discussing the most important issues of our age. Thank you.
I think both Austin and Trent are great. However, during this interview I think that Trent speaks too much. He was so many ideas and thoughts that he has in his mind, and is desperate to get them out. This conversation format could be great, but Trent must let the guest speak more. Austin does this better on his channel. (I'm Catholic BTW).
I think he was too excited. He apologized a couple of times for it but I agree, he talked too much.
You don't need to know everything.
My favorite video on the Gospel Simplicity channel is the interview he did with Dr Eugenia Constantineau (which I'n probably spelling wrong). I think it's titled "Think You Know What Happened at the Crucifixion?".
Thanks for this dialogue. May God reunite his Church into one body and to His will.
(edited for spelling & other reasons)
great discussion lads. Glory to God
Is Austin still not Catholic. (I jest) We are praying for you Austin, brother. PAX
How is the assumption of Mary an obstacle to becoming catholic? It doesn't indicate she is equal to the trinity. Doesn't mean she's a goddess. God can do whatever he wants, there's no problem with taking his mother to heaven.
The funny thing is that there are people in the Bible who were assumed into heaven, Elijah being one of them.
So it's not something that is unheard of.
@@EruIluvatar5makes you wonder why people hate Mary. Like if it happened for others why can't it happen for her. She is a huge part of the story of Christ
It's not biblical.
because, as dogma, it is something one MUST believe as a Catholic, but as anyone with eyes can see it is totally ahistorical. There are no contemporary writings about it, it isn't until centuries later that the belief is even recorded, and it isn't codified as doctrine until 1950 AD.
@Doc-Holliday1851 doctrine develops over time... something that Protestants also do. It's more your pride that gets in the way. The fact is simple, the assumption doesn't take away anything from Jesus
Let’s keep praying for Austin and his beloved wife, that one day both come home to the Church that Christ founded 2000 year as ago.
I’m not being aggressive but I’m just asking , in response to your comment, what about the Filioque? I mean, the Council agreed on the Creed, and Latin Church of the west changed it unilaterally. I wonder if you might have a response to that. Peace.
Great discussion ! Appreciate the respect for each other. I’d summarize it by authority. Individual authority or church authority
As a former Catholic and current Protestant I encountered way too many contradictions between the traditions of the Catholic faith and the Word of God. Apparent contradictions are not in and of themselves a bad thing as they can be explained with sufficient knowledge. However, I found that Catholics did not have sufficient reasons to explain these contradictions and when asked which wins out in that event (tradition or the Bible) they just said that can't happen because the Holy Spirit guided both. So while I was staring these contradictions in the face I was being told by catholics that the existence of these contradictions were impossible. And since, in the event that there is only two mutually exclusive ways of doing something I chose to follow the Word of God.
In befo da "who put your bible together?!?!"
@@anthonym.7653 what?
@@anthonym.7653 The early Church which was before any large splits, which comprised of Orthodox, Catholics, and Protestants.
@@Doc-Holliday1851The problem with that is Protestantism is even less credible. If you doubt the Church you should also doubt the Bible and abandon Christianity. Simple as. You can’t leap into an ignorant Protestant church where they talk in a hallowed voice about the Bible and be safe and still be intellectually honest. As Trent showed the Bible is full of things that are questionable and have to be taken on faith. If you can’t take the Church on faith there’s really no reason to take the Bible on faith either
With regard to the exodus vs assumption issue, the key difference is that one is explicitly taught by multiple authors within the Scriptures, whereas the assumption isn't even really an implication, but a later development by tradition. So it really isn't a fair comparison
100%
The thing is that Catholics and Orthodox also hold to sacred tradition as infallible rules of faith and the assumption is explicitly part of sacred tradition, especially in our more ancient liturgies as well as the fathers.
The analogy is that the assumption is to tradition what the exodus is to scripture, not that the assumption has as much scriptural evidence as scripture does.
@maryangelica5319 right but the question was being posed as if it was the same barrier to entry for a conversion to protestants to catholics as non believers to protestants and I have a very hard time rationalizing how the two can be similar unless catholics literally believe that tradition is equal to scripture... which would imply that scripture can be contradicted by the very thing that supposedly derives its authority from scripture itself. The protestant coverting is already starting from a spiritual presupposition that the Bible contains God's word and is infallible, whereas a non believer would not, and I have to think the arguments about authority would be different from those two positions such that the analogy doesn't really line up. However thank you for your comment that did clarify the point for me
@@jonathanw1106
"I have a very hard time rationalizing how the two can be similar unless catholics literally believe that tradition is equal to scripture... which would imply that scripture can be contradicted by the very thing that supposedly derives its authority from scripture itself. "
the first part is actually kinda true (kinda... there are some nuances here), but the implication is false.
Essentially, what we call Sacred tradition (not just random practices called small "t" traditions) does not derive its authority from scripture. Rather, both scripture and sacred tradition derive its authority from the Word of God himself, Jesus Christ, who is more properly the true "source" of revelation; they are two interrelated channels of revelation flowing from the one Source, rather than two fully separate rules. In fact, we sometimes think of the scriptures and tradition in terms of "written" and "oral" tradition (like Paul describes in 1 Thes 2:15... (the Jews also had notions of "written" and "oral" Torah, so it's a pretty natural concept for us to have as well), since scripture is also handed down to us. And since both come from the Word of God, they cannot contradict each other, since that would mean God contradicts himself. But rather, both inform each other. To see how this works, consider that basically every aspect of sacred tradition is at least understood in terms of scripture. Even the more esoteric Marian dogmas, if not explicitly supported, are at least understood as such (see the Assumption and Revelation 13, or the immaculate conception and Luke 2+ comparisons to the purity of the ark of the covenant, etc. ), and give the actual content of tradition. On the other side, the formation of the scriptural canon itself was a matter of magisterial action appealing to sacred tradition. You can't have the scriptures qua bible without tradition (or the magisterium), and you can't have tradition without scripture.
Now, there are some nuances about the level of "infallibility" here... we do say scripture is inerrant as well as infallible, but we don't say the same of tradition. The best place to see a good description of the relationship between scripture and tradition is the magisterial document "Dei Verbum" . I really recommend you read it (it was ghost-written by Benedict XVI back when he was just a priest participating in the second Vatican council). He lays it out way better than I ever could.
@maryangelica5319 great comment I appreciate the detail! I'll chew on this for a bit, although I have some additional thoughts on the analogy itself that may make sense irrespective of this particular debate over authority
This episode could have been so much longer!! ❤
So interesting, I needed this 🙏, I believe conversations like this can unify us as Christians. My thoughts for those considering Catholism : if you establish that it's foundation and its fruits (evidence, moral teachings, saints etc.) are true, then jump in. Doubts are not the opposite of faith, denial is. You don't have to 100% all the time be convinced of every dogma, you just have to "not deny them". Faith & doubt can go together, hence why we need grace. The time is coming when "we shall be like HE is" and hence "see things perfectly"
I love you Trent - but I wish you had been shorter with your comments and had given Austin more speaking time.
For me, the problem with the way the subject was approached in the video is that it seemed to me that Protestantism was being treated as "a Church" in comparison to Catholicism and Eastern Orthodox. When in fact it is one category of churches (Protestant) being compared to two churches. A better approach is to compare the two categories (Protestantism vs Ecclesilialist) or comparing individual protestant churches (Lutheran, Reformed) vs Catholic vs Orthodox. If this were done, the conversation would be more viable and precise.
Thanks for having Austin on. I have followed him since the beginning of his YT videos. You before that, but don’t tell him 😂😂😂😂. Anyway awesome interview
Stimulating conversation. These dialogues are more enriching and thought provoking.
Two thoughts: First, when you were talking about the Assumption of Marry, Trent, around the 25:00 mark, you starting talking about how someone might want to rely on the authority of the Church in order to assist in the belief in the Assumption. I don't want to put words into Austin's mouth, or the mouths of any Protestants, but isn't this question begging? If someone wants to say "I am not Catholic because I disagree with the Church on the necessity of believing in the Assumption", and the Catholic response is "Well, sure, but the Church actually does necessitate that we believe the Assumption", then, that seems like question begging to me. Did I completely miss your real point? I feel like I misunderstood you, so please do correct my misunderstandings! Second, at the 44:00 ish mark, you two are talking about how its possible that, if an agnostic watches a lot of smart Christians and a lot of smart atheists, that Agnostic might start to think "Wow, I am doing well to remain agnostic!". You never say this, but it seems implied that this is a bad thing, or a shame of some sort. And I guess I look at myself, and I think that I am that person, I am that agnostic who does watch a lot of Trent Horn and Graham Oppy, and I think to myself that this isn't so bad! The way that I view it is that Agnosticism is an intellectual humility - I admit that I don't know what I don't know! Do you see it differently? Do you think its a bad thing to remain agnostic?
Anyway, thanks for the awesome content, I am loving all of the inter-faith dialogues!
Yes, it all comes down to authority. We should not be picking a religion based on individual beliefs but rather on whether its founder and leaders/successors have authority. Authority determines what is truly divinely revealed. The truth of individual beliefs do not and cannot determine who has authority.
@@tonyl3762 Can you see how this could be construed as an example of "begging the question" though? The non-Catholic says to the Catholic "I doubt that the Church has the authority that she claims to have, since I doubt that the Assumption of Mary was a real, historical event". Then the Catholic says "No no, we know that the Assumption is a real, historical event, because the Catholic Church said so, and She has Authority!". The Catholic here has assumed the falsity of the very point that the non-Catholic is bringing up!
@@NontraditionalCatholic While I can see why you say that, it is rarely the case that the Catholic apologist is just assuming the Catholic Church has the authority she claims for herself. The sharp Catholic apologist is always welcoming a debate/dialogue about epistemology and authority. To say that the more fundamental issues of epistemology and authority need to be determined first is NOT equivalent to question-begging. It is merely inviting the Protestant/debate to go further back in the logical chain.
@@tonyl3762 I mean, isn't it begging the question, by definition? The Catholic who makes the argument as I presented above has a premises which assume the truth of the conclusion. A Catholic would need to support the Doctrine of the Assumption without leaning on the Authority of the Church in order to avoid Begging the Question, if some non-Catholic was using the Assumption as a challenge to Church Authority.
I am not Trent Horn and I am only responding in hopes that I can be of help. don't read the rest of what I write, if you don't feel like it!
In answer to your last question first, the problem that was being discussed was "analysis paralysis", of listening first to one and then to another, and is swayed back and forth.
But your particular question was staying in the agnostic mode, as you are. I think an agnostic who stops asking questions or listening for answers, is a sad person, because that person has lost faith in reason, which will always question. And I do not think you qualify as "that person". Do you?
And in answer to your first question, what was being talked about at the 25:00 mark, was making a comparison between the inerrancy of the Bible and the infallibility of the Church.
But it seems to me that your question is if a person rejects the Catholic Church because of the dogma of the Assumption, how can the authority of the Church be convincing? But, if a person believes everything *else* that the Church teaches, then that person's belief system includes a belief that the Church was instituted by Jesus. So appealing to the Church's authority would make sense (see the 37:00 mark) in that situation.
Does that make sense?
Trent seems to mainly interact with either liberal protestant ideas or fundamentalist ones and seems not to think there is such a thing as mere- Christian orthodoxy. Just an observation.
What is mere christian Orthodoxy?
@@fleskenialation Not Orthodox, orthodox. And as they mention in this dialogue, a minimal approach is favored by Protestants and a maximal one by Catholics. So I'm saying there is a minimal set of doctrines discernible from history, Scripture, and tradition.
@@Jim-Mc
Ah i see what you mean. Humbly, I may both agree and dissent. My concern is when we merge multiple components together to find some meta truth but we lack submission to an institutional hierarchy, we (or at least I) open ourselves to ideas that have not been stress tested and might therefore lead us too far in the wrong direction. We might then neglect our need for experiential insight.
Whoever comes to debate, we always benefit to cement and solidify our true Christian faith!
Thank you, Trent!!!
As a Catholic I have watched Austin. So glad you had him on your show. Good man.