This is not carrier grade nat, It can be adapted to make a stopgap CGnat function but on top of that your 172 range you use is outside both the RFC1918 and RFC6598 so you are hijacking public range for private use if you actually deploy this.
They are different, but they are often used in conjunction with each other. NAT is network address translation. It translates traffic from one IP address to another. Port forwarding is similar, but it functions on the port level.
This is not carrier grade nat, It can be adapted to make a stopgap CGnat function but on top of that your 172 range you use is outside both the RFC1918 and RFC6598 so you are hijacking public range for private use if you actually deploy this.
Agree with some of theses commets. This is not CGNAT
is CGNAT the same as port forwarding?
They are different, but they are often used in conjunction with each other. NAT is network address translation. It translates traffic from one IP address to another. Port forwarding is similar, but it functions on the port level.
@@mr.wisp_254 so which is the best port level or as you described
?
This is no carrier grade nat
This is SRC NAT and not CGNAT
Very nice.
kindly post a session on caching
Coming soon. Thanks for watching, and kindly remember to subscribe if you haven't.