The J-10 defeated the Eutofighter Typhoon 9-0 in 2024 during the Qatar ZILZAL2 exercise. The Typhoon has two 89kN engines with afterburner per unit, an AESA radar, electronic countermeasures and modern avionics. With the J-10 we are therefore faced with an efficient and modern aircraft with BVR armaments such as the PL-15, potentially the PL-17/21 and the very efficient PL-10 at short range, an AESA radar, a sight of helmet, cutting-edge avionics and countermeasures, a reactor with high thrust (ws-10B or C of 13.2 or 15.5 tons of thrust) and very high maneuverability with its vectored thrust.
US F-16 first flight: January 20, 1974 China J-10 first flight: March 23, 1998 "Military Watch Magazine believes the J-10C with WS-10B engine stands out when comparing the Chinese airplane to the F-16V. " “Ultimately the superiority of the J-10C is overwhelming. " Jun 2, 2024.
It's not that J10C is better than the latest version F16. But the F16 sold by the United States to Egypt is too poor. The range of air-to-air missiles is only 40 kilometers. Cannot carry long-range anti-ship missiles or ground cruise missiles. The system is locked and cannot attack Israel. And the price is twice that of J10C.
The J-10 defeated the Eutofighter Typhoon 9-0 in 2024 during the Qatar ZILZAL2 exercise. The Typhoon has two 89kN engines with afterburner per unit, an AESA radar, electronic countermeasures and modern avionics. With the J-10 we are therefore faced with an efficient and modern aircraft with BVR armaments such as the PL-15 200-300kms, potentially the PL-17/21 300-400kms, and the very efficient PL-10 at short range, an AESA radar, a sight of helmet, cutting-edge avionics and countermeasures, a reactor with high thrust (ws-10B or C of 13.2 or 15.5 tons of thrust) and very high maneuverability with its vectored thrust.
J10C or F16 fighter jets. Both are good fighters. The difference is F16 I think connected to the US military computers. US can detect anywhere the F16 fly.
@@tonysia6474 The J-10 defeated the Eutofighter Typhoon 9-0 in 2024 during the Qatar ZILZAL2 exercise. The Typhoon has two 89kN engines with afterburner per unit, an AESA radar, electronic countermeasures and modern avionics. With the J-10 we are therefore faced with an efficient and modern aircraft with BVR armaments such as the PL-15, potentially the PL-17/21 and the very efficient PL-10 at short range, an AESA radar, a sight of helmet, cutting-edge avionics and countermeasures, a reactor with high thrust (ws-10B or C of 13.2 or 15.5 tons of thrust) and very high maneuverability with its vectored thrust.
The j9 (the prototype before the j10) cane about many years before the Lavi. In fact, the Lavi which only reached prototype stage, looks like the j9. Lol
Interesting point! The J-9, which was an earlier prototype before the J-10, did indeed precede the Israeli Lavi. It’s true that the J-9 and Lavi share some similarities in their design, which is likely due to shared design philosophies and technological influences of the time. The development of fighter jets often involves iterative design and adaptation, so it's not uncommon to see similarities among various prototypes. Thanks for pointing that out! ✈️🛠️
spot on, only BVR matters and this is where J10c excels comparing to old generations F16 A/B and C/D ; US will never sell full-function F16V or F35 to Egypt due to Geo political reasons.
@@hejjbdhfg-i5j The J-10 defeated the Eutofighter Typhoon 9-0 in 2024 during the Qatar ZILZAL2 exercise. The Typhoon has two 89kN engines with afterburner per unit, an AESA radar, electronic countermeasures and modern avionics. With the J-10 we are therefore faced with an efficient and modern aircraft with BVR armaments such as the PL-15, potentially the PL-17/21 and the very efficient PL-10 at short range, an AESA radar, a sight of helmet, cutting-edge avionics and countermeasures, a reactor with high thrust (ws-10B or C of 13.2 or 15.5 tons of thrust) and very high maneuverability with its vectored thrust
Three countries with weapons and aeronautics technology such as Brazil, Turkey and South Africa should come together and design a quality fighter jet and BVR missiles so as not to be subject to the wishes of Europe, the USA, China and Russia.
The answer to some questions of which one is the better? My opinion is the one with the longer range the better one. Just like comparing USA M16 rifle 300m effective range against China QBZ191 rifle 450m effective range.
'Egypt' cant put all eggs in one basket, on 'cheaper' side they must try to upgrade F16s like 'Turkey' as well as go for expensive option to buy new J10s like Pakistan 😊
@@truesouth4784 The J-10 defeated the Eutofighter Typhoon 9-0 in 2024 during the Qatar ZILZAL2 exercise. The Typhoon has two 89kN engines with afterburner per unit, an AESA radar, electronic countermeasures and modern avionics. With the J-10 we are therefore faced with an efficient and modern aircraft with BVR armaments such as the PL-15, potentially the PL-17/21 and the very efficient PL-10 at short range, an AESA radar, a sight of helmet, cutting-edge avionics and countermeasures, a reactor with high thrust (ws-10B or C of 13.2 or 15.5 tons of thrust) and very high maneuverability with its vectored thrust.
@@truesouth4784 if you look at Serbia's landlocked position in Europe, the sanctions it receives and its request to join the EU you will understand the choice of the Rafale... Egypt and Indonesia initially chose the Rusde SU-35 but gave it up due to US sanctions and subsequently purchased the Burst. The burst also took advantage of the US's refusal to sell the F-53 to certain Muslim countries to give Israel a technological advantage in the region. It will take you 3 minutes in Google search to check if you are in good faith......
@@truesouth4784 if you look at Serbia's landlocked position in Europe, the sanctions it receives and its request to join the EU you will understand the choice of the Rafale... Egypt and Indonesia initially chose the Russian SU-35 but gave it up due to US CAATSA sanctions and subsequently purchased the Rafale. The Rafale also took advantage of the US's refusal to sell the F-35 to certain Muslim countries to give Israel a technological advantage in the region. It will take you 3 minutes in Google search to check if you are in good faith......
@@chfanzaguo The J-10 defeated the Eutofighter Typhoon 9-0 in 2024 during the Qatar ZILZAL2 exercise. The Typhoon has two 89kN engines with afterburner per unit, an AESA radar, electronic countermeasures and modern avionics. With the J-10 we are therefore faced with an efficient and modern aircraft with BVR armaments such as the PL-15, potentially the PL-17/21 and the very efficient PL-10 at short range, an AESA radar, a sight of helmet, cutting-edge avionics and countermeasures, a reactor with high thrust (ws-10B or C of 13.2 or 15.5 tons of thrust) and very high maneuverability with its vectored thrust. Better plane. Better engine. Better armement. Better technologie for the J-10c. 😉
'China' made 'weapons' although 'cheap' r ordered only as a 'last' option. 'Pakistan' tried very hard to convince USA for F16s, b4 ordering J10s. Even before 'Pakistan' preferred to develop new JF17s rather than ordering J10s. 'Cheap' electronics like TV, or bikes can b used from 'China', but 'cheap' 'weapons' can put human life in 'danger'. 'Turkey' made a wise decision, they convinced USA for new F16s 😛
Without BVR Missiles the Egyptian F-16 are looking like a sitting ducks. Thanks to Camp David Accord which restricts Egypt to maintain a credible air power with high-tech weapons.
US sold AIM120 to Taiwan, but the missiles are stored in U.S. base on Guam not Taiwan, means Taiwan cant use the missiles they bought without U.S. approval and don’t know what would happen if PLA parks a carrier in between Guam and Taiwan, lol.
The US probably won’t allow those missiles to be integrated in the egyptian F16s. As long as you operate these planes they still have a say in what you can do with them
You don’t know anything bro. PL-15E maximum range is 145 km.Google it! Is 145 km range shorter for you?🤔 Bro 145 km BVR is enough for shoot down Israeli 4th gen fighter jet such as F-16 & F-15.Because on the other hand American AIM-120C model BVR maximum range is 105 km which using Isreal.And America did't give AIM-120 C to Egypt. So in this situation Chinese 145 km range PL-15E is the best option for Egypt.
You don’t know anything bro. PL-15E maximum range is 145 km.Google it! Is 145 km range shorter for you?🤔 Bro 145 km BVR is enough for shoot down Israeli 4th gen fighter jet such as F-16 & F-15.Because on the other hand American AIM-120C model BVR maximum range is 105 km which using Isreal.And America did't give AIM-120 C to Egypt. So in this situation Chinese 145 km range PL-15E is the best option for Egypt.
@@maquacr7014 Exactly! You just proved my point. Price and strings attached! Otherwise anyone would choose F-16 over J-10C, especially Chinese military who know themselves better than anybody else.
@@chaz4609 The J-10 defeated the Eutofighter Typhoon 9-0 in 2024 during the Qatar ZILZAL2 exercise. The Typhoon has two 89kN engines with afterburner per unit, an AESA radar, electronic countermeasures and modern avionics. With the J-10 we are therefore faced with an efficient and modern aircraft with BVR armaments such as the PL-15, potentially the PL-17/21 and the very efficient PL-10 at short range, an AESA radar, a sight of helmet, cutting-edge avionics and countermeasures, a reactor with high thrust (ws-10B or C of 13.2 or 15.5 tons of thrust) and very high maneuverability with its vectored thrust.
That was the orignal plan but then the delays in AESA Radar for the mig 35 due to Ukranian war and sanctions forced Egypt's hand especially with a middles east regional war could errupt in mean time
@@ihabmahmoud571 The Egyptian and Indonesian authorities canceled their SU-35 purchases due to US CAATSA sanctions on Russian arms purchases and therefore purchased Rafales instead. This is in no way a performance problem!!! Their radar, even if it is PESA, has a detection range of 350 km maximum while that of the burst and the F-35 is around 200 km. BVR type R37 missiles and long-range weapons are currently wreaking havoc for 2 years on the Ukrainian forces who have all our Western equipment, so-called game changer.
The Egyptian and Indonesian authorities canceled their SU-35 purchases due to US CAATSA sanctions on Russian arms purchases and therefore purchased Rafales instead. This is in no way a performance problem!!! Their radar, even if it is PESA, has a detection range of 350 km maximum while that of the burst and the F-35 is around 200 km. BVR type R37 missiles and long-range weapons are currently wreaking havoc for 2 years on the Ukrainian forces who have all our Western equipment, so-called game changer.
With all the advantages the J10C has, it is still not better than the F16, a old 3.5 generation fighter as compared with the modern 4 generation J10C. If you cannot be honest, why bother to do an analysis? You might as well conclude the F16 is vastly more superior from the the start?
@jetli740 Top speed, higher cruise speed, greater combat range, greater climb rate, better maneuverability, better avionics including AESA radar, ability to carry long range BVR missiles, more powerful and fuel efficient engine and all for substantially less money. And most of all no political strings attached.
And yet China can built Space Station on its own.. Land rovers on Mars on first try. Built High Speed Railway, making up 60% of all global HSR, zipping at 350kph, without accident.. And then your iphone.. where do you think it is built? And for the US.. Boeing.. enough said.. 🤣🤣🤣
😂 Nice catch! The J-10 and F-16 do share some design similarities, which isn’t surprising given the evolution of fighter jet technology. Both follow similar aerodynamic principles and design lines. The J-10, while influenced by various global designs including the F-16, has its own unique features and advancements. Aerospace design often builds on existing concepts, so it’s all part of the innovation process! 💡✈️
The J-10 defeated the Eutofighter Typhoon 9-0 in 2024 during the Qatar ZILZAL2 exercise. The Typhoon has two 89kN engines with afterburner per unit, an AESA radar, electronic countermeasures and modern avionics. With the J-10 we are therefore faced with an efficient and modern aircraft with BVR armaments such as the PL-15, potentially the PL-17/21 and the very efficient PL-10 at short range, an AESA radar, a sight of helmet, cutting-edge avionics and countermeasures, a reactor with high thrust (ws-10B or C of 13.2 or 15.5 tons of thrust) and very high maneuverability with its vectored thrust.
The reason is simple and clear, Chinese will not disable the fire control when EAF face their enermy !
It’s safer, your j10c won’t be remotely shutdown by the Americans.
J10C possesses top class WWR and BVR missiles. It's an unmatched weapon system based on the cutting edge technology.
US F-16 first flight: January 20, 1974
China J-10 first flight: March 23, 1998
"Military Watch Magazine believes the J-10C with WS-10B engine stands out when comparing the Chinese airplane to the F-16V. " “Ultimately the superiority of the J-10C is overwhelming. " Jun 2, 2024.
J10c beat f16 during an Air combat exercise in Pakistan, J10c won all 9 round.
This is what "made in China" is all about. Bang for buck and it actually works as intended 😊
Is your information is real it is a great News 🎉😂
Lol it was against Qatar typhoon not f-16
@@Moonlit_Loops88 Pakistan has its own F16s
@@mochen9282 Pakistan's F16 are duds. They were shot down by India's Mig 21.
It's not that J10C is better than the latest version F16. But the F16 sold by the United States to Egypt is too poor. The range of air-to-air missiles is only 40 kilometers. Cannot carry long-range anti-ship missiles or ground cruise missiles. The system is locked and cannot attack Israel. And the price is twice that of J10C.
not the main reason...reason is Israel..... Us will not allow egypt to use f16 to fight Israel it own allied.
@@jetli740Israel is not only US 'ally' but its real master.. That's why you hear 'unconditional support' from paid politicians when it comes to Israel
The J-10 defeated the Eutofighter Typhoon 9-0 in 2024 during the Qatar ZILZAL2 exercise.
The Typhoon has two 89kN engines with afterburner per unit, an AESA radar, electronic countermeasures and modern avionics. With the J-10 we are therefore faced with an efficient and modern aircraft with BVR armaments such as the PL-15 200-300kms, potentially the PL-17/21 300-400kms, and the very efficient PL-10 at short range, an AESA radar, a sight of helmet, cutting-edge avionics and countermeasures, a reactor with high thrust (ws-10B or C of 13.2 or 15.5 tons of thrust) and very high maneuverability with its vectored thrust.
It's intentional. Buying junk for exorbitant price and you need to get permission to even fly it.
@@JohnDoe-il4mptrue, buying US made F16 is like buying a cessna with F16 frame with machinegun on top
J10C or F16 fighter jets. Both are good fighters. The difference is F16 I think connected to the US military computers. US can detect anywhere the F16 fly.
@@tonysia6474 The J-10 defeated the Eutofighter Typhoon 9-0 in 2024 during the Qatar ZILZAL2 exercise.
The Typhoon has two 89kN engines with afterburner per unit, an AESA radar, electronic countermeasures and modern avionics. With the J-10 we are therefore faced with an efficient and modern aircraft with BVR armaments such as the PL-15, potentially the PL-17/21 and the very efficient PL-10 at short range, an AESA radar, a sight of helmet, cutting-edge avionics and countermeasures, a reactor with high thrust (ws-10B or C of 13.2 or 15.5 tons of thrust) and very high maneuverability with its vectored thrust.
Waite until Egyptian pilots fly with the dragons that will be amazing like they made with mig 21 maybe more
J10 is based on the J9, not the Lavi.
The electronics were based on the Lavi design,
@@Franky46Boyinitially they say it was the design, now it's the software? 😂
One come with lots of strings attached, the other one with almost no string.
The j9 (the prototype before the j10) cane about many years before the Lavi. In fact, the Lavi which only reached prototype stage, looks like the j9. Lol
Interesting point! The J-9, which was an earlier prototype before the J-10, did indeed precede the Israeli Lavi. It’s true that the J-9 and Lavi share some similarities in their design, which is likely due to shared design philosophies and technological influences of the time. The development of fighter jets often involves iterative design and adaptation, so it's not uncommon to see similarities among various prototypes. Thanks for pointing that out! ✈️🛠️
@@Defenseandscience fake news spewer
spot on, only BVR matters and this is where J10c excels comparing to old generations F16 A/B and C/D ; US will never sell full-function F16V or F35 to Egypt due to Geo political reasons.
@@hejjbdhfg-i5j The J-10 defeated the Eutofighter Typhoon 9-0 in 2024 during the Qatar ZILZAL2 exercise.
The Typhoon has two 89kN engines with afterburner per unit, an AESA radar, electronic countermeasures and modern avionics. With the J-10 we are therefore faced with an efficient and modern aircraft with BVR armaments such as the PL-15, potentially the PL-17/21 and the very efficient PL-10 at short range, an AESA radar, a sight of helmet, cutting-edge avionics and countermeasures, a reactor with high thrust (ws-10B or C of 13.2 or 15.5 tons of thrust) and very high maneuverability with its vectored thrust
Three countries with weapons and aeronautics technology such as Brazil, Turkey and South Africa should come together and design a quality fighter jet and BVR missiles so as not to be subject to the wishes of Europe, the USA, China and Russia.
J-10 is not a derivate of lavi. It's different in many ways. Only common thing is canard configuration.
I'm sure Egypt consulted with Pakistan who've been using the J10C.
J10C also beat Euro fighter Typhon in Qatar Exercise, but we shouldn't forget this 😂 one day a Tejas will fly and beat F-16 and J10C 😅
Only in Bollywood movie
The answer to some questions of which one is the better? My opinion is the one with the longer range the better one. Just like comparing USA M16 rifle 300m effective range against China QBZ191 rifle 450m effective range.
'Egypt' cant put all eggs in one basket, on 'cheaper' side they must try to upgrade F16s like 'Turkey' as well as go for expensive option to buy new J10s like Pakistan 😊
Without bvr and standoff missiles f16 and rafales aren't much useful against a strong force its actually waste of money
Lavi was a f 16 with canards , that is it !
The J10 is cheaper so I guess that has to account for something.
not the main reason...reason is Israel..... Us will not allow egypt to use f16 to fight Israel it own allied.
@@truesouth4784 The J-10 defeated the Eutofighter Typhoon 9-0 in 2024 during the Qatar ZILZAL2 exercise.
The Typhoon has two 89kN engines with afterburner per unit, an AESA radar, electronic countermeasures and modern avionics. With the J-10 we are therefore faced with an efficient and modern aircraft with BVR armaments such as the PL-15, potentially the PL-17/21 and the very efficient PL-10 at short range, an AESA radar, a sight of helmet, cutting-edge avionics and countermeasures, a reactor with high thrust (ws-10B or C of 13.2 or 15.5 tons of thrust) and very high maneuverability with its vectored thrust.
@@fabricemartin5561 I guess that's why Serbia has chosen the Dassault Rafale over the J10
@@truesouth4784 if you look at Serbia's landlocked position in Europe, the sanctions it receives and its request to join the EU you will understand the choice of the Rafale...
Egypt and Indonesia initially chose the Rusde SU-35 but gave it up due to US sanctions and subsequently purchased the Burst.
The burst also took advantage of the US's refusal to sell the F-53 to certain Muslim countries to give Israel a technological advantage in the region.
It will take you 3 minutes in Google search to check if you are in good faith......
@@truesouth4784 if you look at Serbia's landlocked position in Europe, the sanctions it receives and its request to join the EU you will understand the choice of the Rafale...
Egypt and Indonesia initially chose the Russian SU-35 but gave it up due to US CAATSA sanctions and subsequently purchased the Rafale.
The Rafale also took advantage of the US's refusal to sell the F-35 to certain Muslim countries to give Israel a technological advantage in the region.
It will take you 3 minutes in Google search to check if you are in good faith......
Based on J9 in 70s and WS6 Engine
@@chfanzaguo The J-10 defeated the Eutofighter Typhoon 9-0 in 2024 during the Qatar ZILZAL2 exercise.
The Typhoon has two 89kN engines with afterburner per unit, an AESA radar, electronic countermeasures and modern avionics. With the J-10 we are therefore faced with an efficient and modern aircraft with BVR armaments such as the PL-15, potentially the PL-17/21 and the very efficient PL-10 at short range, an AESA radar, a sight of helmet, cutting-edge avionics and countermeasures, a reactor with high thrust (ws-10B or C of 13.2 or 15.5 tons of thrust) and very high maneuverability with its vectored thrust. Better plane. Better engine. Better armement. Better technologie for the J-10c. 😉
F16 can be controlled and destroyed by US any time
You used f-16 picture while comparing it with j 10 c
you can buy ten j-10c for the price of just one f-16
EGYPT should even get the su35 or su30sm from russia .china and russia are reliable partners
Yes, it's also better than the jsf35.
'China' made 'weapons' although 'cheap' r ordered only as a 'last' option. 'Pakistan' tried very hard to convince USA for F16s, b4 ordering J10s. Even before 'Pakistan' preferred to develop new JF17s rather than ordering J10s. 'Cheap' electronics like TV, or bikes can b used from 'China', but 'cheap' 'weapons' can put human life in 'danger'. 'Turkey' made a wise decision, they convinced USA for new F16s 😛
Without BVR Missiles the Egyptian F-16 are looking like a sitting ducks. Thanks to Camp David Accord which restricts Egypt to maintain a credible air power with high-tech weapons.
US sold AIM120 to Taiwan, but the missiles are stored in U.S. base on Guam not Taiwan, means Taiwan cant use the missiles they bought without U.S. approval and don’t know what would happen if PLA parks a carrier in between Guam and Taiwan, lol.
AIM120 has been deployed and stored in TW for years now. You should update your intel before making comments.
O Brasil também não compra mais caças dos US, é sempre uma péssima compra 😂
Since Esreal regime is their neibour it is not wise to have American weapons
J10 the better fighter
They could buy Turkish BVR missiles, they are compatible with F16's..
The US won't allow the deal to go through.
The US probably won’t allow those missiles to be integrated in the egyptian F16s. As long as you operate these planes they still have a say in what you can do with them
You are so wrong. The design of China's J-10 fighter jet is derived from the J-9, not from Israel's Lavi. You might want to look up the J-9.
J10 is suppose to also hv offbore targeting missiles..😂😅😊
China never export PL-15 missiles. But only PL-15e with shorter range.
You don’t know anything bro.
PL-15E maximum range is 145 km.Google it!
Is 145 km range shorter for you?🤔
Bro 145 km BVR is enough for shoot down Israeli 4th gen fighter jet such as F-16 & F-15.Because on the other hand American AIM-120C model BVR maximum range is 105 km which using Isreal.And America did't give AIM-120 C to Egypt.
So in this situation Chinese 145 km range PL-15E is the best option for Egypt.
You don’t know anything bro.
PL-15E maximum range is 145 km.Google it!
Is 145 km range shorter for you?🤔
Bro 145 km BVR is enough for shoot down Israeli 4th gen fighter jet such as F-16 & F-15.Because on the other hand American AIM-120C model BVR maximum range is 105 km which using Isreal.And America did't give AIM-120 C to Egypt.
So in this situation Chinese 145 km range PL-15E is the best option for Egypt.
use correct images in your thumbnail
on your video thumnail both jet r f16
But the F16V the top block is better!!!
Why is u hating abt it 😂..dont westerners believe in sovreignty of other countries or we all should worship the US
Lots of Chinese trolling here.
Do you even know what trolling means
Wrong picture
Should buy the fantastic Indian Tejas 😂
us fighter jets that egypt has is bad and downgraded without bvr missiles why egypt should accept somthing like that its disgusting enough is enough
哥们你封面放了俩f16，那个根本不是j10c
No match for f 16
J-10 is a flying coffin.
I heard that from a parrot once 😂
triggered filipino?
Talk is cheap. Just ask PLAAF if they have a choice would they like to have F-16 or J-10C in their arsenal.
Cut the act westoid, you couldn’t even handle the chinese when they were a back water nation in the 1950s. In Korea.
LOL, PLAAF might be interested in F22/F35/B2, definitely not interested in F16. They have studied F16 multiple times in Pakistan.
No need to relive alternate reality of history or speculate. All I said was “just ask PLAAF”. You’ll be surprised.
@@barryc302 There is no need to get surprised over anything. Pakistanis chose J10Cs since they are cheaper and come with no strings attached.
@@maquacr7014 Exactly! You just proved my point. Price and strings attached! Otherwise anyone would choose F-16 over J-10C, especially Chinese military who know themselves better than anybody else.
It's not the plane, it's the pilot...
What the plane is better, than the pilot???
True, but the pilots still need to fly a reliable machine
So a plane derived from an Israeli design ends up in the hands of Egypt.
The irony is not lost on me...
The design of China's J-10 fighter jet is derived from the J-9, not from Israel's Lavi. You might want to look up the J-9.
@@SKV-q5l I know the type.
I said 'derived', not copied...
Maybe 'inspired' was a better wording.
😂 Hahahaha. Pakistan cannot keep their J10’s flying. They have horrible engines & and pathetic radar systems.
فرق بين f16 و j10
Jai Hind. Unlikely to get the NSA approval. Egypt can also try to buy the powerful Tejas.
@@chaz4609 The J-10 defeated the Eutofighter Typhoon 9-0 in 2024 during the Qatar ZILZAL2 exercise.
The Typhoon has two 89kN engines with afterburner per unit, an AESA radar, electronic countermeasures and modern avionics. With the J-10 we are therefore faced with an efficient and modern aircraft with BVR armaments such as the PL-15, potentially the PL-17/21 and the very efficient PL-10 at short range, an AESA radar, a sight of helmet, cutting-edge avionics and countermeasures, a reactor with high thrust (ws-10B or C of 13.2 or 15.5 tons of thrust) and very high maneuverability with its vectored thrust.
Hahaha even indian air force is not using Tejas haha
Tejas is not powerful, its just flying samosa...😂😂😂
It’s a TEMU f-16
the chinese fighter may be newer but it is garbage!
Oh we’ve got an aerospace expert here
armchair expert here
Improved COPYCAT 😂😂
Who cares ??😂😂
Ppl care about the ”improved” part, not the copycat part. Save your elementary school level insult games, it’s irrelevant in geopolitics
Should have acquired Mig 35.
That was the orignal plan but then the delays in AESA Radar for the mig 35 due to Ukranian war and sanctions forced Egypt's hand especially with a middles east regional war could errupt in mean time
@@ihabmahmoud571 The Egyptian and Indonesian authorities canceled their SU-35 purchases due to US CAATSA sanctions on Russian arms purchases and therefore purchased Rafales instead.
This is in no way a performance problem!!! Their radar, even if it is PESA, has a detection range of 350 km maximum while that of the burst and the F-35 is around 200 km. BVR type R37 missiles and long-range weapons are currently wreaking havoc for 2 years on the Ukrainian forces who have all our Western equipment, so-called game changer.
The Egyptian and Indonesian authorities canceled their SU-35 purchases due to US CAATSA sanctions on Russian arms purchases and therefore purchased Rafales instead.
This is in no way a performance problem!!! Their radar, even if it is PESA, has a detection range of 350 km maximum while that of the burst and the F-35 is around 200 km. BVR type R37 missiles and long-range weapons are currently wreaking havoc for 2 years on the Ukrainian forces who have all our Western equipment, so-called game changer.
😂😂😂😂😂😂
F16 is combat tested compare to the Chinese paper plane
The F16 is being combat tested against who, goat herders? Paper plane, like Boeing or the auto-crashed paper F-35 ?
With all the advantages the J10C has, it is still not better than the F16, a old 3.5 generation fighter as compared with the modern 4 generation J10C. If you cannot be honest, why bother to do an analysis? You might as well conclude the F16 is vastly more superior from the the start?
Tell me one war America fought using the F16 and won.
Iraq? Nope! America lost.
Afghanistan? Nope! America lost.
I rest my case 🤣🤣🤣
@@sean12222 St_pid
how you determine which is better? base on what metric
@@jetli740 Didn't he said that in the video? The J10C has longer range and better air-to-air missile, better radar and super-cruise inter alia....
@jetli740 Top speed, higher cruise speed, greater combat range, greater climb rate, better maneuverability, better avionics including AESA radar, ability to carry long range BVR missiles, more powerful and fuel efficient engine and all for substantially less money. And most of all no political strings attached.
Copy cannot compete with the original.
J10C is much better than F16..
Good luck, Egypt! China made planes made of plastic. Never tested and not proven effective😂 just saying...
F16 is only proven against older obsolete close range fighter jets from 40 years ago. No experience against modern fighter jets beyond visual range.
Apparently China can make better planes from plastic than america can using metal....just saying.
RIP F16
And yet China can built Space Station on its own..
Land rovers on Mars on first try.
Built High Speed Railway, making up 60% of all global HSR, zipping at 350kph, without accident..
And then your iphone.. where do you think it is built?
And for the US.. Boeing.. enough said.. 🤣🤣🤣
American aircraft are junk..
Good idea to purchase the Chinese jet, at least we know how incapable the Egyptian Air Force will be while operating this garbage.
This guy used the pic of F16 for J10😂
😂 Nice catch! The J-10 and F-16 do share some design similarities, which isn’t surprising given the evolution of fighter jet technology. Both follow similar aerodynamic principles and design lines. The J-10, while influenced by various global designs including the F-16, has its own unique features and advancements. Aerospace design often builds on existing concepts, so it’s all part of the innovation process! 💡✈️