TRUMPETER 1/35 CH-47D "CHINOOK" KIT REVIEW

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 7 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 33

  • @michaelhenry7243
    @michaelhenry7243 4 роки тому

    In my opinion, one of the things I love about trumpeter is how they include rubber tires in all of there kits.

  • @get2dachoppa249
    @get2dachoppa249 6 років тому +2

    Thanks for doing this review. It looks to be a decent kit, with loads of room to scratchbuild the missing details that I can see, but thats because I've been in and around these birds since 1992, and know them inside and out. The modeler in me won't let me build a half ass rendition of it, lol

  • @jjab99
    @jjab99 7 років тому

    Wow, now that is a big model and no mistake Beez mate. I have never seen a 1/35 scale Chinook before and this one seems to be ticking all the right boxes. There seems to be plenty of detail and the parts seem well protected too. If it goes together as well as it looks, this will be one very large impressive model indeed mate. I don't know how you are going to fit it into a diorama, but I would bet my last pound that if anybody could do a fantastic job of it, it would be you Beez mate, your Dioramas are just the Dogs Nads!! Best of luck with this one and whenever you do go ahead with the build, please let us know how it all goes together. Many thanks for sharing this lovely kit with us and have fun with your modelling mate.
    Joe

    • @ddmcco4
      @ddmcco4  7 років тому

      Joe's Model Kits cheers Joe. Yes it's an impressive kit. Just hope it continues that way lol

  • @non-prolific135thscalemode7
    @non-prolific135thscalemode7 7 років тому

    Jeez, Beez!!! The 440 mm length are excluded the rotors I guess! I wouldn't have the space for it and up to now I didn't even know this kit existed. Well, I never looked for a helicopter kit in 1/35 except for the Huey, hehehe! I like the metal landing gear. The model will be quite heavy and it's good to know that these parts can carry the weight. The pre-bent rotor blades are cool! Wow, I can't wait until you start it next year. That was a well spent half an hour! Take care. :)

  • @GregReilly135ScaleModels
    @GregReilly135ScaleModels 7 років тому

    Nice review mate it looks like its going to be a fantastic build its a big bugger as well

    • @ddmcco4
      @ddmcco4  7 років тому

      Greg reilly cheers Greg. I can't wait to start it. But got to get a few bits and bobs together first. So next year it will have to be.

    • @GregReilly135ScaleModels
      @GregReilly135ScaleModels 7 років тому +1

      I'll look forward to seeing the build reviews as you do them

  • @135scaledioramabuilds9
    @135scaledioramabuilds9 7 років тому

    That is going to need some planning and yes that is awesome going to have to get myself one LOL keep doing what you're doing Sim

    • @ddmcco4
      @ddmcco4  7 років тому

      1/35 Scale Diorama Builds cheers mate

  • @davidhuvelin9167
    @davidhuvelin9167 3 роки тому

    Hello, what are differences between 1/35 Trumpeter CH-47A and 1/35 Trumpeter CH-47D ?

    • @gunslinger2989
      @gunslinger2989 2 роки тому +1

      Well, since no one else chimed in: The aft pylon is blunted off on the D model, and has different vents on the front. The D model sponsons are slightly different, although most people won't notice any of the differences other than the strakes that were added for better stability. The D model also features the asymmetric rotor blades. That pretty much covers the main differences between the kits. In real life there are many more that you wouldn't see on either kit.

  • @ArmourEmpire
    @ArmourEmpire 7 років тому

    Jeez. That thing is a beast. Very cool subject

    • @ddmcco4
      @ddmcco4  7 років тому

      Armour Empire cheers Mark

  • @hgbarnes1584
    @hgbarnes1584 7 років тому

    OMG! I'll echo Steve... you bugger... yah had to show us that now didn't you??? LOL Not boring at ALL! Thanks Beez.

    • @ddmcco4
      @ddmcco4  7 років тому

      HG Barnes thank you mate

  • @KentsPaintShack
    @KentsPaintShack 7 років тому

    Nice review thxs for sharing

    • @ddmcco4
      @ddmcco4  7 років тому

      Kent Galpin of The paint shack thank you

  • @kevinegan6876
    @kevinegan6876 7 років тому

    thank you beez for your review

    • @ddmcco4
      @ddmcco4  7 років тому

      Kevin Egan thank you

  • @MottysMilitaryModels
    @MottysMilitaryModels 7 років тому +1

    Great review mate, you bugger I wanted this. By the way, no difference mate, just diff regiments that's all

    • @ddmcco4
      @ddmcco4  7 років тому

      Mottys Military Models - Steve Mottram cheers mate did wonder.

    • @simonkemp.models4742
      @simonkemp.models4742 7 років тому

      Is there a kit you don't want ?

  • @danielc.8006
    @danielc.8006 4 роки тому

    Could you scan the instruction manual and post it?

  • @mh53j
    @mh53j 6 років тому

    Lack of any details in cargo bay (ie bench seats ) and any defensive weapons a major disappointment for the price. Bought one years ago, still unbuilt despite purchasing some Cobra Company detail sets. Want to build British version with Land Rover WMIK coming out back to hide empty cargo bay. Anybody know if conversion for British Chinook available?

  • @johnmooresscalemodels5176
    @johnmooresscalemodels5176 7 років тому

    Super looking tank there beez where is the shooty thing? :-) J

    • @ddmcco4
      @ddmcco4  7 років тому

      Thats what was missing lol!

  • @paulsscalemodels5915
    @paulsscalemodels5915 7 років тому

    Hi pal does the bridge to far group build start today?gonna put a vid on inabit👍

    • @ddmcco4
      @ddmcco4  7 років тому

      WW2 28mm miniatures with Paul yes mate the 16th

  • @KentsPaintShack
    @KentsPaintShack 7 років тому

    All good mate at least you paint your own stuff I just looked at this guys napoleonics he has like 1800 views and what do I find half way through my figures that he is working on figures that I painted and put on my blog so I left him a long wordy what the heck

  • @leew8812
    @leew8812 6 років тому

    review in macro mode

  • @jacklassiter2181
    @jacklassiter2181 5 років тому

    Watched about five minutes, got bored. If youre going to do a review, I prefer one where it looks like youve seen the item before and thought about what youre going to say, rather than waiting for you to hem and haw and "uhhh..." and contemplate. In other words, script it out, move along quickly. This review could have been done in about eight minutes.

    • @ddmcco4
      @ddmcco4  5 років тому

      Thank you for your comment and feedback!