Rolex Daytona 116520 - the most UNDERRATED Daytona!
Вставка
- Опубліковано 3 лип 2024
- Let's talk about the Rolex Daytona 116520 - one of the most underrated Cosmograph Daytonas, often forgotten when compared to the Zenith Daytona that preceded it, or the Ceramic 116500LN that came after it.
Special thanks to @Chronext for lending in the Daytona from the video. Buy Rolex watches at CHRONEXT:
bit.ly/cxtRLX
0:00 Intro
0:39 Sought after Daytonas
1:07 Rolex Cosmograph Daytona 116520
1:17 Production History
1:40 Importance of the Pre-Ceramic Daytona
2:20 Compared to the 116500LN
2:38 Classic Design
3:04 Compared to the Zenith Daytona
3:45 Conclusion
What's your favorite Rolex Daytona? Which Daytona reference do you think was the most important? And if money was no object, which Daytona one would you buy and why? Let me know what you think in the comments section.
Follow me on:
Instagram @shahlusso: bit.ly/ShahLussoIG
Facebook: bit.ly/ShahLussoFB
For more watch reviews & articles visit shahlusso.com/
Music by ZMC the Godchild: bit.ly/zmcYTs
If you like these videos subscribe to the channel: bit.ly/ShahLussoYT
#rolex #daytona #watches - Навчання та стиль
What's your favorite Rolex Daytona? Which Daytona reference do you think was the most important? And if money was no object, which Daytona one would you buy and why? Let me know what you think in the comments section.
Interesting that when they introduced the 6-digit series in 2000, they kept the bezel numbers horizontal on the _steel_ 116520, but made them radial on the _gold_ models, such as the 116518.
Great insight
Thanks :)
I have owned 16520, 116520 and 116500. They are all great…I think the 116520 is the one to get right now. I think that watch has a big future ahead of it.
💯
And which do you think is the best, aesthetically?
@@Hennes1216520 probably but they’re all winners.
Just bought one of these with the white face. My fav Daytona and I’ve got many of them.
Congrats on the new Daytona in your collection! Hope you enjoy it for years to come :)
Out of all of them, I'd pick the previous gen 116500. Great proportions and solid watch, all hype aside.
this daytona is best, stainless rings within a stainless ring.
💯
Watching with a P-serial Daytona from 2000 on my wrist. Love the first gen 6 digit...
I go to the Rolex 24 Hours of Daytona race every year with Lamborghini, and nearly everyone there is wearing the current generation Panda Ceramic Daytona, you will see dozens. One of the race engineers had the steel bezel white faced Daytona though and it is what stood out from the crowd. Beautiful. I’m definitely in the market for a good one.
Such a cool story, and I can totally imagine how that nice steel bezel would’ve popped amongst all the ceramic ones. Love that you got to see it in its natural habitat too - the racetrack 😀
Hope you find yours soon 🙏🏼
The steal looks better to me. Something is off w ceramic especially on the black face
Zenith white dial. Love the symmetry that isn't there in all models after
True, that’s one thing Rolex didn’t manage to improve on when they introduced the 4130 - you’d think they’d have thought of that when building a brand new movement 🤷🏻♂️
This model feels much more utilitarian than the modern ones
So true - with it really staying true to that design from the late 80s when watches were still very much used as tools you can definitely see that in the 116520 while the 116500LN and the new 126500LN both look decidedly more luxury IMO
While i like the symmetry on the Zenith dial. I would go for the the 116520. certified preowned though. White dial, as I have the black dial BB Chrono. 😅
I used to have the BB Chrono too :) one of my favorite things about it was the look it has with the metal bezel (the current panda ones are nice but I wish they hadn't put the black bezel insert into them)
is the older clasp not as good?
The 5 digit references (Zenith Daytonas) had the older, stamped out clasp, the 116520 onwards had the newer milled clasp with the Easy Link - so much more like the current Daytona
@@ShahLusso sorry i mean the buckle lock system, older 116520 uses the "hole" style, right?
@petemorbius3936 yes this one still had the hole clasp - I’m not 100% sure though if that remained all the way till the 116500LN or if they did an update on the 116520 before they replaced it
@@ShahLusso it was updated after 2007-2008 (to be same as current rolex clasp). i wonder if the "hole" system if ok? ease of use?
@petemorbius3936 super easy to use, the newer clasp may be marginally more secure with the lift lock (but let’s face it as soon as the clamshell is open your watch isn’t coming off by accident)
Personally I find it as a nice medium between the modern one and the old friction fit clasps, definitely not a dealbreaker IMO