Comparing the Panasonic Lumix G9 Mk2 against the OM1 for wildlife photography. Which is best?
Вставка
- Опубліковано 12 січ 2024
- Two great cameras compared. With the Lumix G9 Mk2 now having phase detection AF these two cameras are now in the same ball park. Each has its advantage and disadvantage.
It is hard to know which one to choose, but I try and make the call.
In some situations the OM-1 had the advantage, but in others the G9 Mk2 is way out in front.
Mike Lane wildlife photography www.nature-photography.co.uk/
Music by: bensound.com Enigmatic
License code: 4S6K0YI6EFY3SDZK - Домашні улюбленці та дикі тварини
It's so refreshing to see wildlife-oriented photo gear being evaluated by an actual wildlife photographer. As a happy OM1 / 150-400 owner I am pleased to see that Lumix finally has a bird-worthy camera and that it will work with my lens. Thank you.
Thanks.
Aww ;) I got the PL100-400 for wildlife and the G9 for the lens. The OM1 hadn't quite been born and no I cannot afford that Ollie lens. I do find the focus acquisition speed of the G9 excellent with DFD. No, the recognition and tracking is not all it could be on the G9(1), but I do not rely on it - just aim the camera. With the Dual2 and the PL100-400 half the weight of the Moon bazooka I can throw the camera around. It rather depends on how you use your camera.
I really like this kind of review/comparison. Very use case. Thanks
All your work really shows, great job.
Thank you very much!
Great review Mike, thanks for sharing.
Thanks for watching!
Thank you for the review! Great to see it being based on your own experience.
Thanks.
great video mike; keep them coming
Thanks, will do!
Great video comparison Mike. ❤️👌 Thanks a lot.
My pleasure!
Well done. Clear, concise, and on point.
Thnaks.
Since your review was published, Panasonic released the Version 2.1 firmware for G9M2 on 30 Jan 24. On my camera running this version the unit no longer "locks up" while a buffer full of images is being emptied - all of the user interface is functional, modes can be switched, etc. As the buffer begins to empty, it is possible to continue shooting JPG or RAW stills; half-pressing the shutter will show how many images can be shot (in the form of "rNN" shown on the screen in place of card capacity) before the camera must pause again to clear additional buffer space. In fact, once the buffer is half-emptied it is even possible to record video from 1080 all the way up to 5.7K while the still images in the buffer are still being written to the card.
Hi. Did the firmware upgrade improve the slow start up time of the G9ii? Thankyou.
Interesting comparison video of two great cameras, Mike - thanks.
Glad you enjoyed it
Thank you for making this video Mike, a very useful comparison. Look forward to seeing more examples of G9m2 video. Really appreciate the work and knowledge that you share on this channel, top work 👍
Thank you.
Excellent video Mike. Its certainly given me a lot to think about
Thanks Roger. I will bring it with me.
Fantastic and very helpful video Mike. Besides the terrific analysis, I just wanted to say your video and photography skills are splendid - even if it was just a test!
Glad it was helpful!
Very nice video to see the differences between the cameras. Well done
Glad you liked it
I love it when you do your own unique tests, it often gives such an interesting different view!
Thank you!
Amazing video. For MFT bird photography content, you are the best !
Thank you.
Great comparison, thanks for making it.
No problem!
Thanks Mike, I have been thinking about getting a G9 MK2 I will have to save up now. Thanks for sharing.
The next OM camera must be coming soon. I have heard rumours that some photographers have the update to the Om-1, but I am sceptical.
You were a big help with my g9ii purchase. Thank you. Mine arrives tomorrow. I'm excited. I hope you're still enjoying it.
I am!
A huge thank you for this! The focus in video mode seems incredible
It really is!
@@MikeLaneFRPS Do you use the G9 ii also regularly for photos or more for filming?
Thank you for doing this comparison. Your video comparisons are way better than other UA-camrs.
Thank you.
It it is so refreshing to see an unbiased and highly informative review like this one.
Glad you liked it!
Nice comparison. Mike is a treasure in the photography world.
Thanks.
Super review Mike as always. I am super impress with G9II video AF performances you have demonstrated. If I am into video, i would for sure get G9II to go along with OM-1. Cheers.
I am enjoying using it.
Thank you for making this video. The amount of work you put into it is reflected in the clarity of both the video and your thoughts. I don't own either an OM-1 or G9ii, and this has certainly given me food for thought on my eventual upgrade path. Thank you again.
Thank you.
Excellent test/review. thank you. I wonder if the speed of focus acquisition might be improved by software updates.
I think unlikely, but I would like to try a Lumix lens.
Great comparison video Mike exactly what we need to know maybe some of these other content creators should take note 👍😄
Thanks.
Mike, good to see you like the camera and thanks for the review. One of the few micro 4/3 wildlife guys out there. If I was panasonic I would of called you and at least lent you a copy version since you do actual wildlife photography with MFT gear. You put out videos week after week with their gear..... Thanks again.
Thanks for your comments.
The same sensation here as with your first video I watched! So relaxed yet authoritative. There is no one in the youngster's videography club that can equal you. I am not seriously into bird photography but your findings are so relevant anyway. Keep doing your great job, Mike!
Glad you enjoyed it!
Great review!
Glad you enjoyed it
Thanks! As another commenter said: the relative slowness of finding focus could be cause of the Olympus lens. Will be interesting to see if Panasonic release a whachamacallit .. an update at some stage
Thank you so much for comparing these two cameras from a bird-photographers perspective. Glad you found a new and better video camera!
Glad it was helpful!
Good real world review Mike
Thanks.
Thanks for that!! Are you going to go through setting for bif and video on the G9ii? I got the OM-1 and the 150-400mm. I also just got the G9ii and haven't set it up. btw you are the best!!
Thanks. Not got it planned to do. Videos on settings take a long time to do so need a lot of bad weather days. I prefer being outdoors
Thanks for another great video. I bought the G9ii and am very happy with it. But I also keep the OM-1 for now. I will make my final choice depending on what either do with FW updates this year.
The next OM camera must be coming soon.
Great work mate, thank you!
My pleasure!
Thanks Mile for this comparison, I have an OM-1 and Pana Leica glass, (200 f2.8 & 100-400) and I have been really frustrated that OM systems don't allow them to operate at 50FPS or in regular ProCapture mode. This is clearly their decision to prevent them from functioning in these modes, as the G9ii will operate at 60FPS with any lens. Based on your results for AF on the G9i, I think it will be a better option for myself.
Yes frustrating.
I think it's worth trying the new Lumix 100-400 as well. Remember the 150-400 is off-brand and that's likely to affect some features.
Yes it’s a lens compatibility issue even the original g9 with 100-400 Panasonic is faster.
For panasonic any lens with dual is will have very nice stabilisation
I sold my Lumix 100-400 mk1 so not able to compare.
@@MikeLaneFRPSnever waste a good crisis maybe you could sell the Olympus 100-400 and get them PL 100-400 version too it is much smaller and a little faster than the Olympus it now can be used with teleconverters too
and it is stabilised so you have Dual IS
Panasonic's video AF is impressive. Thanks for video.
It really is!
Nice video, The Snappy Autofocus of the OM1 is good for stills, but the gradually focus of the G9 MK2 look so much better for video (I have not seen how the OM1 handles video when it loses focus and regains, if it snaps back and forward it is unattractive)
Very interesting video Mike. I only do stills , so I will stick with the OM1 I think. Looks a great option for you though.
Thanks.
Interesting and as ever well presented, thank you for sharing. One question (not being a video shooter), at around 16:40 you decided to focus on one of two Berwick Swans. Am I right in thinking that you had selected a group of focus points to achieve this rather than "ALL" as was the case earlier in the video?
I would not have time. I can't remember, but that clip was probably in slow motion so happening much quicker in real time. I just put that swan more central in the frame so the AF locked onto that one.
Great vlog Mike. I hope the G9 ii meets your expectations. This is the camera body I plan to purchase to replace my old and faithful Nikon D7100. Hopefully the auto-focus sluggishness can be improved with a firmware update. All the best from Newfoundland, Canada.
thank you.
Thank you for this video I did notice straight away on my G9II the focus on video was so much quicker than the OM1. I still wouldn't sell my OM1 as it is such a great peace of kit. I look forward to more video's on the G9II.
Glad you like the OM-1.
This is one of the videos that attracted me to your channel first, namesake. Excellent! Because of this excellency, please correct the misspelling in the title.
Done. Thanks
Hi Mike great video I found you through one of the camera groups thank you - May I ask, have you done a video on setting up the G9ii camera for birding. I have just upgraded from the G9 and have had a few learning difficulties and it would be good to see just how you have set it up. Thank you again paul. I use the 100-400 lens.
Sorry I have not and I only use it for the video.
Great comparison video Mike. Just wondering if the difference in stills focusing is more to do with the lens being an Olympus lens and thus optimised for the om1. A better comparison would be if you used the new Panasonic 100-400mm lens on the g9ii and the Olympus 100-400mm on the om1. I'm sure that I have seen it mentioned elsewhere that there are some other very slight issues when using the Olympus 150-400on the g9ii.
I sold my Lumix 100-400mm so not able to compare.
Happy to see you bought yourself the G9M2. Now I have an extra source to learn more about the G9M2. In stills mode I experience that the AF is slower in the beginning too. But when in focus it seems far more sticky than my OM-1. With the 150-400mm I had some problems with finding the bird through the camera. I think this is because of the difference in height of the viewfinder.
Thanks for sharing
Glad to hear you found the video AF to be better. Shame it doesn’t have bird detection AF above 4K 60p but your 120p samples looked great. Now we need OM Systems to improve video AF so we can stick to one body.
Hopefully the next OM camera will improve video.
Thanks for this video. Very much appreciated. I'm not a birder, but I was a photographer for many years. Thanks also for the info about the OM-1, as I inherited one from my late father and have never used it. The 'Pro' setting sound like a very useful facility. Loved the pictures of the Lynx, the Hobby and the Tawny Owl. I'm a fan of Birds of Prey and where I live near Portsmouth, we have all four Falcons present. I live on the East Hants/Sussex border, close to the sea. We have breeding Peregrines at Chichester; Merlins on Hayling Island; Kestrels on Portsdown Hill and visiting Hobby's during the summer. Also Tawny Owls in the local woods. Must buy some film and see what the OM-1 can do, although I only have the standard lens. Shame my Russian Zenit lenses won't fit, as I have a collection of them, plus a pair of Zenit B cameras I bought in 1970. They still worked the last time I used them... about 25 years ago.
Glad it was useful.
Last week I bought the G9 II online, haven't received it yet but can't wait to get to know the camera and work with it...I'll still use my old fantastic canon 90D side by side the G9II.
Thank you for grate review.
Hope you enjoy it!
Interested in understanding the locations you referred to for Barn Owls and 'the path' which you referred to. Are you able to give us some tips? Thanks
Great review. Have you been able to test the G9 II in low light conditions. Especially, overcast conditions or during dawn with subjects in between bushes? It will be interesting to see how the auto focus works especially for videos with twigs and branches in the foreground.
It is the same as any other camera not as good in low light and with twigs around, but far better than the Om-1. I have a recent Roe deer film that shows it working okay with branches in the way.
The Roe deer clip is fantastic. Your close up shot is amazing and I liked how it goes out of focus when trees come in and then focuses back to the deer. In India we have these barking deer that’s a very shy animal. The irony is that it gets into the thickets in a matter of seconds upon seeing a safari jeep. And then shooting from the jeep is always challenging especially when you need a tripod. We usually tie a monopod to the jeep frames and shoot.
Good review as usual. Did you use the same lens when comparing focus speed?
Yes I did
Very Interesting Mike, Thank you. I have 2 OM-1 bodies which I love (one for landscape, 1 for wildlife - saves changing lenses) but I have been disappointed with the video autofocus and had wondered whether is was just my inexperience, perhaps not! Have you tried the G9II with the Olympus 100-400? I could get the body and use it with my 100-400 if the video autofocus is good with that lens.
I have not tried the 100-400mm yet.
Nice unbiased review. I've heard mixed reports about the G9 Mk2. some say the photo side isn't as good as the OM-1 but nearly all say the video is far better. Saying that video is what Panasonic are good at.
Its the AF in video that makes it for me.
Thanks for the review. I'd be interested in your view for stills photography in 6 months time, whether or not the slow AF has become more noticeable and annoying in regular use. The original G9 was my last Lumix camera (in a long line) and I sold it because the DFD continuous autofocus was so poor I often gave up trying to photograph birds because I knew it would be unable to capture the moment. Since returning to m43rds after a 5 year hiatus I have been very impressed with the OM-1 and I am enjoying again the lighter weight of the system. I might need a second body for my occasional pro work and if that is the case (as it is not wildlife related) I could see possibly getting the G9II.
Thank you.
really good, gona update my em5 m3 to g9 m2 someday...
Good Stuff Mike. Thanks for sharing the info. Love my OM-1. Maybe OM Systems will up their video game to try to match the G9II. If not.... the video on the G9II looks fantastic.
I hope OM do improve the video capability.
Hello and thanks for this review. All of your tests were made with the same lens on both cameras?
Yes.
Thanks... 👌🏻👍🏻👍🏻🙏🏻
Very interesting
Happy New Year
Will you do an analysis of the new OM SYSTEM TG-7 ??
Best regards from Spain
No. I only do occasional reviews on kit I buy and use myself.
Thank you for this comparison, very interesting. Did you observe any significant difference in AF performances and image stabilization between the 2 cameras coupled with the Zuiko 150-400 mm f4.5 lens? I mean for still photography, not videos
There will be a difference in IS between the two as only the lens IS works and not IBIS with the Lumix fitted. The AF difference was only as reported in the film.
Really interesting Mike! I was really torn between the om1 and g9ii and was wondering if I went with the wrong camera by getting the Lumix. I was coming over from flagship full frame bodies so some of the stills changes have been a little surprising. As you demonstrate, the video capabilities of this thing are wild. I was a Fuji xh2s shooter but its video autofocus was terrible and the 240fps was unusable quality wise. Here, the 300fps looks awesome and the video autofocus is so amazing, it’s really eye opening. ’m still finding it plenty competent for stills
The OM-1 mk2 is better for video AF, but still not as good as the GH9 mk2.
Interesting comparison Mike. I was very disappointed by the AF on the G9 Mk1 but loved the camera - especially paired with the 200mm Leica prime. I still use my R5 with 100-500 aswell as the 300mm and 500mm primes. I struggle to work out if it's time to jump back to M 4/3. Do you have any regrets after your with from full frame?
No regrets, but I would be happy with any camera system. Choosing between them is a close call.
Very interesting regarding the AF of the G9 II for video. I wonder how the GH6 functions ??
I sold the GH6 before buying the G9 2. The G9 2 has the best video AF I have used so far. I have to manually focus far less.
Great review and comparison Mike. Seems like they're very competitive, atleast in photography. The G9ii seems to be head and shoulders a better video camera.
About the slowish AF, it is a setting for the live view (doesn't affect image focus) that you can change in the camera. Wrench icon> Monitor/Display 1> AFC Live view> Speed priority
I can't find any mention of this setting in the G9ii - only for the S5ii, and even so that setting is about image quality in the live view rather than focus speed.
With not having moved forward enough to shoot video, you have indeed answered a few questions I may have had on this new camera, but will endeavour to stay with the a OM-1 for the foreseeable future, for stills, it's the bee's knee's for me and my BiF shooting on the 150-400, thanks for the testing and your findings.....
For stills I would stay with the OM-1.
@@MikeLaneFRPSIs the difference big for stills? Not counting the slower focus acquisition.
I have all Panasonic lenses and for that reason am leaning more towards the G9ii. But am still doubting.
@@user-my4qm5dt8q I would not call it a big difference. Many people would not notice the small delay I demonstrate and after 10 minutes of use I stopped noticing.
I agree, with the 150-400 on hand, I like to use a dedicated lens for the body, the lens and body are twins that should never be separated......though today I got a good reminder of why my E-M1 Mark III is still my solid backup and doesn't need to be replaced.....
Great stuff. I'm a GH6 with Panasonic 100 - 400mm user, shooting mostly wildlife video at 120FPS manual focus. You video has convinced me the G9II is a worthy upgrade for me. I was going to hold out for the GH7 (maybe subject based auto focus will also work at 120FPS) but the G9II seems to do well at 120FPS without the subject based element.
I am enjoying using it for video flight shots.
@@MikeLaneFRPS Would be good if you could try and caputre some low flying birds coming towards you with busy backgrounds. That's what I've struggled with most.
hi mike
thank you for comparing and sharing both of these cameras. I think that if you want to get the best out of both cameras, you should put your own brand lenses on both cameras for the best results.
Panasonic on Panasonic, yes for the DFD (and Dual-IS) but Panasonic lenses work on Olympus backs just as well as Olympus lenses do. They're supposed to be compatible but sadly they are not. The Ollie 150-400 will go Sync-IS on the OM-1, which because the image is not jittering will aid the AF - it will not go Dual2 on the G9M2 which does the same thing with a Panny lens. Arrgh!
I sold my Lumix 100-400mm so was not able to compare.
Hi Mike. Useful video clip. I now use my old G9 primarily for street photography with some excellent Panasonic / Lumix lenses and will not be buying the mark 2. For me there is nothing better than the OM-1 for easy of use and transportability for wildlife photography which is why I now have two!! However, for video I find my Sony a1 to be superb with 200-600mm lens. Just to let you know, OM Systems have now replaced my continually fault 150- 400mm x1.25TC with a new one 😊. This good customer care.
Glad to hear they replaced it.
Thank you for this great video comparison! It's always refreshing to watch your realistic and down to earth videos.
So, in a nutshell, the "old rule of thump" is still valid: Oly for photography, Pana for video. Good to see though that Panasonic finally kept up with the AF in stills photography. Hopefully OM System will bring their long awaited (and kind of announced) major firmware update - maybe this will solve some of their video AF issues (and bring some other necessary improvements too!)
Personally, I will stay with Olympus/OM System just b/c they are much much more beautiful, with their look and feel just great. Not exactly an objective criterium, but photography should also be fun ;) Plus, I'm a photographer (no video), and I'm not sure Pana could give me all these great computational modes (like e.g. live ND which is extremely useful for landscapes).
Thanks.
As a stills photographer shooting wildlife using an OM-1, your video helps me answer the question whether I should consider the G9-ii as a new backup camera. Based on your careful review, I don't think I would gain much, so I'll stick with the EM-1 Mark ii as backup. Thanks for contributing to this decision.
Its main advantage is for video.
I am glad Panasonic has a great camera as good for the system.
For me the real test of auto focus aquistion is in deep jungle in poor light where the bird gives you only a breif moment to lockon. I am very happy with the OM1 in such conditions. I do wonder how the G9mk2 does.
Excellent overview Mike… I was about to order a second OM1 body for my macro set up but this has really got me thinking. I am certain that the OM1 could get a software update pretty soon though to counter the G9 ii… let’s hope so 🤞
Surely the next OM-1 camera is due. Its been a long time.
@@MikeLaneFRPS let’s hope… I’m sure it will be incredible going by the OM1 🤞
There’s no way there’s any new features coming out in a firmware update for the om1. The lsst firmware update was ages ago and I’m not sure they added any features post launch. It was quite disappointing really. I thought something like insect subject detection would have been a simpler addition
As the owner of the original Lumix G9 I appreciate you giving the Mark 2 version a chance. The nice thing about the MFT Lumix/OM system is the general interchangeability of the lenses. By buying the G9 Mark2 you not only get better video but you have a back up stills camera to your OM-1. I really like the feel of the original G9 in the hand. What were your impressions of holding the Mark 2 after a session with the camera in the field?
Not something I generally notice. Nearly all of my pictures are taken on a tripod. I am not holding the body much.
Hi. Thankyou for your video. You raised some interesting points. I was wondering if you could tell me how long the G9ii and OM1 take to power up from a cold start to taking a photo. I`'ve heard the G9ii takes longer than the competition. Thankyou
Hard to measure short durations with a stop watch but g9 about twice as long as the om1. 1 second v 1/2 second roughly
A very good review, Im impressed by the AF in video, as Ive not seen it properly tested on wildlife. I cant see any 'pulsing' either, which is very impressive.
The Af on GH6 is pretty naff and useless in anything but good light, and I resorted to buying a follow focus wheel which really helps with manual focusing.
Would be interesting to test the Af of the G9 mkii with the f11 aperture of the 150-400 with internal tele and the MC-20 2x tele - which is great for video on my GH6 (AF aside!), as with pixel to pixel mode Ive got an effective 4K 120fps 3000mm set up!
If I get a chance I will try it, but have not used the 2x for a long time. For stills on the 150-400mm the quality was very poor.
@MikeLaneFRPS yes I've come to a similar conclusion with stills. Usable in (very) good conditions, but the hut rate is low and it doesn't have the same detail as no tele.
But with video it's excellent. Sometimes it needs a touch of sharpening if cropped to HD though
Can’t wait for you to get your hands on the 150-600 f5-6.3 and the OM-1 mark ii
I will buy the camera, but not so likely the lens.
No need as you already own the 150 to 400 pro
Thank you for your video and analysis! I recently moved up from my G9 to the G9 II and I am now going out on occasion exclusively for video. I have a couple of locations I am very excited to revisit using the G9 II PD auto focus instead. Very happy I found your channel. Subscribed and Liked! Do you recommend any video editors? I am actually very happy with my video straight out of camera and wondering if I should just be happy with that. Hey, was looking to buy a cup of coffee for you, but you don't have a link. Well, I don't mean to be bossy, but come on now, get one up there! No fair being so helpful and not allowing us to reciprocate with at least a cup of coffee or two. 🙂
I use powerdirector. Very intuitive compared to the well known brands. Sorry I never drink coffee. 🙂
Hi Mike, thanks for that great video. As an OM1 owner, I have been eyeing the G9ii since it was announced. A couple of questions please:
1. I noticed at the start of the video (2’08”) you seemed to have had the cat’s eye AF symbol selected - not the bird symbol. Did / could this have affected the AF speed for stills pics at the start?
2. What is your feeling regarding the weather sealing on the G9ii? Does it seem any where near as robust as the OM1?
If that is on the Lumix G9 then there is no bird symbol. The cat symbol is the whole animal kingdom, unlike the OM-1.
I do not know the answer to question 2 regarding weather sealing. Is it possible to visually judge? The Lumix is larger and more square edged, rather than the smooth contures of the OM-1. I would prefer the feel of the OM-1, but not to the point of chosing to buy one or the other.
@@MikeLaneFRPS Thanks for your reply, Mike. Yes, I see now having looked it up - one symbol for all animals / birds. It's a very tempting camera - if the OM1 had the G9ii's video capabilities...
And now we have the OM-1 mark ii with a 150-600mm F/5-6.3.
Has the G9ii AF been updated to allow for better subject acquisition?
I would think it too new for updates, but it is better than any other Lumix MFT for AF.
I purchased the G9 II when it first came out. I'm a hybrid shooter using heavy Canon gear so was looking forward to a lighter setup as I do quite a lot of travelling. Unfortunately I had big problems when quicky switching from Stills to Video and vice versa. every time i switched from one Video to photo mode there was a delay before I could start shooting, this caused me to many shots. For this reason I had to return it, I just couldn't trust that it would start taking pictures when I asked it to. A real shame.
Your video part of the video was exactly what I was looking for.
Autofocus in slow motion with birds in flight.
Great, thanks.
Because of the band video to focus in the non-existing auto focus in slow, slow motion,
I bought the G9II.
I and will do the focus test with the Lumix 100-400 Mark I and Mark II on the G9II and the Zuiko 100-400 on the OM1.
Btw, if you are in the menu of the G9II and press the display button, you get comments to the menu settings on screen. Interesting not only for the individual focus settings.
And you should try the near and far focus setting, that I put on the 2 front buttons of the G9II.
Then you can tell the camera very quickly to focus on the nearer or further subject of the picture.
Quite a unique feature on the camera I think.
But thanks for the video.
Well done and a great help!
Ok, I have tested it.
The G9II clicks from near out of focus to in focus in no time. Very fast. Same as your OM1 with the Zuiko 150-400.
With the Zuiko 100-400 and 40-150 it takes a little longer but not as much as in your video.
On the other hand the OM1 is quick with the Zuiko lenses but a little slower with the Lumix lenses.
So if you want to have the fastest auto focus with your cameras it seems best to stick with the lenses of the same company.
Thanks for this. I sold my 100-400 Lumix so not able to compare.
I also got the same change of photography; more away from pictures, got more into filming animals; I love coots and I got the G9 II before watching this video.
I just feel RIGHT with this camera, and I really love you are showing a coot
Thanks for sharing!!
@@MikeLaneFRPS got an opinion to the coming Om System 150-600? 😇👍
Not really. I saw one the other day. Looked very big and chunky. Not something I will rush to buy. The 150-500 with the built in extender would remain my preference unless I hear from those that have one that it is wonderful. tel@@cutecoots
@@MikeLaneFRPS thanks and good evening! ✌️😇
I like the way you compare cameras and systems ever since you shot Sony. It would be great if you could compare a few other brands. Have you ever tested Fuji xh2s?
I only review gear I own and use. I don't have access to lots of gear like some reviewers seem to have.
@@MikeLaneFRPS Mike if you ever want to test Fuji then you can borrow mine. I have the 100-400 and the extender.
Thank you.
Not disagreeing but trying to find an explanation. I noticed with the snappy focus test that the OM-1 blanks the monitor where the G9M2 keeps it running. According to the video timing, they're about the same time, you would be able to get exact timing frame to frame off your video editor. Panasonic have traditionally used a smooth focus transition for follow-focus in movie mode, less jerky. You are using a very, very good Olympus lens but it does not support DFD: DFD is practically instant focus. You are using "Set1", with my G9 the Sets do not have the same functionality. With my Olympus backs the camera does more of the focus heavy lifting, the G9 needs more user input to tell it what to do. With my G9(1) I have not found the lack of PDAF to be a problem, with a DFD lens. With an Olympus lens there is a tendency, not exactly to hunt but to breathe slightly on AFC (C-AF). Not a problem as the shutter won't trip until they are locked but can preclude use for fast action shots. PDAF probably has better detect and tracking capability. Using recognition/detect can slow the G9(1) AF speed down a trifle, as can tracking, it has to think about it before moving the lens. Horses for courses in a greek parliament.
I counted G9ii takes 16 frames, and OM-1 takes 9 frames. That's 640ms v.s. 360ms.
Hi Mike, do you have plans to review the OM1 Mark 2 and the 150 600 lens?
Hi, I don't have access to either. I would expect to buy the camera at some point, but the spec is so disappointing there will be no rush unless I hear from others that the AF is much improved. YT films on the subject have not sold the camera to me.
I don't have either camera but I believe the G9ii has custom auto focus sets that customize how smooth or snappy the auto focus moves.
I think all AF cameras have such parameters you can change. Nothing I tried on the G9 Mk2 made any difference.
Awesome & Thanks Sir :)
Most welcome
lovely informative video mate. subscribed:)
Thanks for the sub!
Hi Mike… interested to know your thoughts on the OM 1 mark ii… don’t like the idea that no more firmware updates for the first version will be available. Apparently the video tracking is now better so will be good to hear your thoughts. Best wishes Paul
Very disappointing spec. I think of Olympus/Om cameras as very innovative and was expecting something special. It will be a while before I get one to see what the AF improvements are.
@@MikeLaneFRPS thanks Mike… the one thing that annoyed me more than anything was someone asked would they be doing future firmware updates on the OM1 and their reply was simply… no 😳 I’ve watched a few reviews and it’s as if they are all reading from a script… everybody goes through the improvements but in the same order… we both know they all get a free camera and lens so they are just paying lip service… interested to see if the video bird tracking is as good as they now say it is… I was going to buy the new OM1 but I may get the lumix as per your set up. Appreciate you replying always. Regards
Hi Mike, what are the settings for AF in photos that you find most effective? the three items AF sensitivity, af area switchins sensitivity and movins subject prediction, how should they be set in your opinion? I did some testing but didn't find any obvious differences.
Regarding image quality however, how can you say that there is no difference between the photos? I had the om-1 and I find more detail in the images obtained with the g9 ii when you view the photo at 100% of its size it is evident. I hope they improve the writing speed on the SD and the AF in photos, because I often have soft photos with the G9 II. Maybe the om-1 is a little more precise.
Best regards
I would have AF sensitivity set to -2. I do not want the AF to jump onto a new subject. The other two I do not know. I would leave them set to mid range. Very difficult to see differences in these sort of settings on any camera. I am not using the G9 Mk2 for stills, only video.
@@MikeLaneFRPS thank you
Thank you for your informative video. I use both these bodies. First I would say the G9MK2 is in a different place for video, esp. with native lenses. I have an old battered PL100-400 and a better 50-200 and with either it is easy to hand hold video of birds, insects and the like. I cannot do it as well with the 300 F4 or Oly 100-400 on that body. The stability of video on the OM1 with the oly lenses used the same way is not a good as the lumix combo, its not as good as the old G9 with native lenses. This does not matter if you use a tripod, but for me it does. Focus aquisition in stills on the G9MK2 seems faster with native lenses than using the Oly ones, which you would expect, and may explain that hesitation that you found. If you need to crop the lumix gives you more MPs to play with which can help. Why do I keep the Oly, I think the native lenses I use are better than most of the lumix ones (50-200 excepted) for stills. For video its different.
Have you evaluated the possibility that using an Olympus lens on a Panasonic camera could be the cause of the focus delay? Thanks. Carlos
I sold my Lumix 100-400mm so could not test it.
When you film birds in flight in slow motion, do you use the PAL 4K 100 fps or the NTSC 4K 120 fps?
Also, what color profile do you use? Vlog, Natural, CineD2 or another one?
Thank in advance for the answers.
I use NTSC 4k 120 fps and have the colour profile set to Natural. I am no expert on video settings and fine it all confusing.
@@MikeLaneFRPS Ok, thanks for the answer.
And natural has the dynamic range, that you can get the details of a bird, when you take pictures of them against the bright sky?
It is the only option I have used.@@DatuDieter
Was your G9M2 set to af-c as well in your bird eye test? Because in s-af it still uses contrast detection. Phase detection is used only in c-af.
@@rogeryoung3587 why moving? The opening test I refer to is a static scene
Great to hear you like the G9ii Mike, I’ve had mine since November and I’ve noticed a big difference over the original G9. When doing static shots of Robin were you using SAF, or CAF as phase detect is only active in CAF and may have made the difference 🤷🏻♀️. Looking forward to seeing more vids using the G9ii, and recommendations on which AF custom modes you recommend. When panning do you switch off L to R IS?
CF.
I never touch IS settings. Never seen a problem.
I wonder if the AF would be faster with a Lumix native lens? Hard to say, the original G9 was perfect ergonomically, and the usability was much better than Olympus at the time, due to the old menus, but as everyone knows, their AF just never got the job done. Thanks for a really nice review!
I used to have the 100-400mm Lumix, but sold it before I made this film. It is not so much slow focusing, once locked on it was okay, just a slight hesitation at the start.
I wonder if that first test has anything to do with the lens was it an olympus lens? Maybe a Panasonic lens on a lumix body would focus faster?
Thanks for the video, I’d be interested to know if you were in NTSC, PAL or cinema mode & what type of file (mp4, mov or ProRes) as I’m struggling to see slow motion on back screen after recording 4K 120p? It just seems to play at normal speed - I’m obviously doing something wrong
Pal and .mov files. There are two ways to set up slow motion. You have selected the option to shoot 120 fps, play back at normal speed, but in post production you have the 120 fps so can slow it down there. The other way is shoot at 120 fps and it plays back already in slow motion. In post production you could speed it up to normal speed.
I do not have a YT film on how change this, but others do. Search Yt for "lumix g9 set slow motion" Worth sorting out. Wildlife in slow motion looks wonderful.
Thanks Mike, I'll definitely look into it and work it out :) @@MikeLaneFRPS