So, HRA paid $1600 of the $2.1k storage bills and the defendant only paid $490. The only way HRA paid any money is because the defendant LIED and told them that the items in storage were her items, not someone else's. It was a double scam. She defrauded HRA and the plaintiff. As soon as she told the judge "I was trying to make a profit" I knew she couldn't be trusted. I will bet a 6-piece chicken dinner that the plaintiff later found items missing.
The defendant is a scammer. She definately locked the plaintiff out of the online account. She got HRA to pay for the unit, under the guise it was hers, and she was going to sell that woman's stuff. If I were the plaintiff, I would call HRA.
I personally do not think she looked 😞 defeated.. it appears to me that she doesn’t have a conscious. Look at her she doesn’t appear to feel phased by her conduct she feel entitled to the things in the storage ( remember she wanted to make a profit in order to make a profit you would have to put in the least amount of money down on the storage unit. In this case she put in $490.00 and she had the mitigated gall to sue the lady for $1500. For her own property.. and to top it off she lied to make it appear that the money HRA put in was from her bank account.. that why JM asked her to produce 🧾🧾🧾🧾 from her bank account to prove that she paid the storage fees. She is the kind of scammer who will look for anngles in a ⭕️ to wiggle their way out of their lies. But people who creat Ponzi schemes to extract money out of people always get caught in a web 🕸️🕸️ of lies. Now remember she did this to her friends who gave her a place to stay when she was homeless.. and this is how she repaid them.. why couldn’t she have said I’ll help you out like you helped me when I was homeless.. isn’t that what friends do for each other they look out for each other in times of need.. how pathetic.😫 American Greed is one of the most powerful show created check out those episodes. This lady has nothing on those scammers.
I disagree. I say do a better job at finding people you associate with. I am a harsh judge of character yet have a large friend group. I have trusted them with tons of money in cash and them me. Nothing has ever been taken, any loan has been repaid and monetary gifts remain monetary gifts. If you care about yourself you should better assess people you hold close.
She helped her have a place when DEFENDANT was in need during her DV & she admitted to wanting to keep it bc she wanted to profit off some else’s items when she wasn’t even paying the rent herself. WOW!
I can't believe Judge M actually gave her a chance to find the records. She flat out lied and said she didnt know that agency and that SHE made all the payments!! Then she had the nerve to say the "Plaintiff is making that up just to get out of paying her" when she KNEW the agency paid some of that for her. Judge M should have went off on her for that.
Judge Milian was nice to this defendant by allowing her time to retrieve evidence after the fact. I’ve seen her rule against individuals who don’t have their stuff together.
I caught that too. The way she accused the P of ‘choosing to not go back to her apartment’ and also pretending that she didn’t know what “bicoastal”means.
That was the scam. She put the storage in her name. Removed acces so the girl couldn't pay then when it went into default she signed up with an agency to pay the storage while she sold that girls stuff piecemeal.
Why did the judge give this girl so many chances when it was proven she had lied so many times??? Seems like the judge didn’t care at all during this case the plaintiff could have stolen items and scammed more I feel sorry for the plaintiff.
The defendant is on assistance and the only way to get the government to pay for the plaintiffs storage. The defendant had to put it in her name.. So she lied and said the plaintiff let her put her stuff in her storage, because she was homeless, staying with her/plaintiff, she lied and told the welfare office that the plaintiff moved and the the defendant lied and said the Plaintiff “abandoned” the unit and in order not to lose her (defendant) stuff.. she needed the assistance to keep her own stuff.. so thats how she was able to get the welfare office to pay for it.. That’s exactly what happened.. She a liar and scammer and she should have paid the plaintiff for lying to the judge.. SHE WAS LYING AND IT WAS CLEAR AS GLASS.. not sure why The judge played blind on this case.. People are sick.. she will get hers though.. up man beating the breaks of yo ahh, the plaintiff let you stay in her house, without even knowing you.. bee had the whole place to herself.. and she does this.. THATS BECAUSE SHE DONT KNOW THE PLAINTIFF AND HAD TO EMOTIONAL ATTACHMENT TO HER.. THEREFORE SHE DIDNT CARE.. ALL SHE SAW WAS DOLLARS.. That lady husband asked her to help someone who he knew and obviously trusted.. and she took advantage of the the situation. SMFH It’s ALWAYS YO OWN PEOPLE, yet they always crying about Dwight man.. At this point ( for decades now).. Nobody does another black person worse than another blk person.. SMFH
Me too !! I live in California and they definitely don't help you with storage fees. Every time they (the city) cleans up an encampment and tosses everything. Tents, beds, cooking stoves..... Everything
Well the plaintiff isn’t that honest herself. She was in contact with manager of the storage facility for a long period of time yet couldn’t make payments? And know she only payed for two months, got money back and her stuff. I mean that’s so weird 😂
I'm shocked the judge didn't acknowledge the fraudulent payments. The plaintiff got her belongings back without having to pay anything past the 2mos. This case was weird.
What are you saying? The plaintiff was locked out for 2 months. The defendant wanted to keep her stuff and sell it. In her words the plaintiff “abandoned” her stuff! But the defendant was lying the entire case! So what’s weird?
@markgiles6568 I think you should re-watch the episode. The plaintiff only paid for July/August. Every month there after was paid for fraudulently by either an agency or scammed check. Remember, there was an issue with one of the checks the defendant claimed she paid. BTW the defendant was a piece of 💩. Nevertheless, the plaintiff received access and got her belongings back without paying any additional money. That's why it's weird, in my opinion.
@@nicolesmith583 the defendant took the plaintiff off the account, which she couldn’t get access into the storage unit. So the judge ordered the defendant to take her name off the account so the plaintiff could now pay and/or get her stuff and/or put in another lawsuit if things are missing! Because the defendant said she was just going to sell it. Neither party won. The defendant was just trying to keep the plaintiff stuff and also counter sue for 2,000 when she herself didn’t even pay for the storage unit. The plaintiff couldn’t get any money because she don’t know if all her stuff is in the unit or not to say it’s gone. So that’s a lawsuit for another day. Yes, the plaintiff only paid for 2 months. Yes, the defendant was writing bad checks and lying under oath. But she also took the plaintiff name off the unit to gain access. The plaintiff never got her stuff until after the verdict.
I knew it didn’t make sense because she didn’t have money to get her own place in the beginning but has $800 in cash to pay on a storage unit that’s not hers🤔
JM loves to over talk people. She would ask a question and then not give them time to answer then ask another question then gets upset when they don't answer the first question. Damn let them answer the question you're asking them
She sure does she makes me sick! Rude and loud and arrogant as hell just like Mathis. And to the silly commenter above, bringing someone else to the conversation never changes the facts about the original statement. 🥴🥴🥴
@@jennybarstow1447there isn’t real logic in your statement, because there is no mutual exclusivity between the judges; however, IMO, JJ interrupts when litigants do not answer her questions or try to give more (unnecessary) info.
Why would any organisation pay someone's storage fees? The defendant claims to never have heard of the organisation, yet someone's name is on the application form. This case made zero sense.
Public Assistance programs can and may pay for storage units for those who are unhoused or transitioning to new housing. NYC has some of the best programs in the US.
@@marilynwillett804 I think they just pay random bills as an act of charity but I think the real story is that the defendant knows exactly who that organization is and since the storage unit was in her name they were paying it on her behalf. It would only make sense being that the defendant was a DV situation, she probably claimed she had to go to a domestic violence shelter or stay with family and those are her thins to get them to pay the bill.
Why is the judge surprised that this lady tried to recoup her money by possibly selling the defendant stuff because now she’s responsible for the bill… I don’t know why the judge is so blown away by that!?!
The defendant is on assistance and the only way to get the government to pay for the plaintiffs storage. The defendant had to put it in her name.. So she lied and said the plaintiff let her put her stuff in her storage, because she was homeless, staying with her/plaintiff, she lied and told the welfare office that the plaintiff moved and the the defendant lied and said the Plaintiff “abandoned” the unit and in order not to lose her (defendant) stuff.. she needed the assistance to keep her own stuff.. so thats how she was able to get the welfare office to pay for it.. That’s exactly what happened.. She a liar and scammer and she should have paid the plaintiff for lying to the judge.. SHE WAS LYING AND IT WAS CLEAR AS GLASS.. not sure why The judge played blind on this case.. People are sick.. she will get hers though.. up man beating the breaks of yo ahh, the plaintiff let you stay in her house, without even knowing you.. bee had the whole place to herself.. and she does this.. THATS BECAUSE SHE DONT KNOW THE PLAINTIFF AND HAD TO EMOTIONAL ATTACHMENT TO HER.. THEREFORE SHE DIDNT CARE.. ALL SHE SAW WAS DOLLARS.. That lady husband asked her to help someone who he knew and obviously trusted.. and she took advantage of the the situation. SMFH It’s ALWAYS YO OWN PEOPLE, yet they always crying about Dwight man.. At this point ( for decades now).. Nobody does another black person worse than another blk person.. SMFH
Do not trust anyone with your belongings or money period do not even let anyone know what you have.Do not allow anyone/or put anything in your or their name.
Yep she tried to take credit for the amount the HRA paid in the little 490 that she paid which equal up to 2100, so in theory she was trying to get credit for the 1600 as well,, She lied under oath and that's called stealing
Yeah, I distrusted the D almost immediately, but then thought maybe the litigants had miscommunications. Meanwhile, JM, IMO was a bit sassy to the P and it was undue.
Probably was the dependents plan from the jump 😂 she thought she was gonna sue for money she didn’t pay lmao she signed up for a program to pay for the storage…she thought she came up on some money lmao
Do the producers of the show call people ahead of time to let them someone from the show will be calling? Greg was a little too cool and ready when Judge Milian got on the phone with him.
As a storage manager if a person comes in its put in there name ID has to match the rental. We dont put anyone else as primary. Alot of ppl come in no ID or whatever the reason . Judge is right if it goes in lien status and is auctioned off ( California) after 3 to 4 months of non payments it can affect your credit. We tell ppl this all the time. And we ask are the items your storing yours! Most say yes. So legally its whoever the primary is.
She’s funny! “Hello (whomever), try not to faint or wet yourself, but this is Judge M!!” -lol! Oh my, I don’t know who looks more ridiculous, her or Dougie with his nutty questions like “do you understand you lost!! You get nothing!!! (Or whatever the silly question is!) 😮😂
@@marilynwillett804 - uh, it’s called “sarcasm”, ever hear of it? Oh and she never said “don’t be nervous or anything, but this is Judge Milian” -that’s what I was joking about!! Geeze, get a sense of humor! Sooo, I guess my question to you is: what is your problem??
The judge usually says if the defendant doesn't have any proof they lose but in this case I can't believe that she's actually giving her a chance to prove her case at another time...
She wasn't making the payments at all she just got the call when the storage went into default because it was in her name and tried to take advantage and sell that woman's things without calling her to let her know what was going on. A scammer that's watched too much Storage Wars
lol I bet she lied about the DV (if anything, probably was the one doing it), and I bet she already picked out the good stuff from the storage unit. Why would she pay for the unit for months, while not selling things already? It would have made no sense.
This ruling sucked. Milian was unfair to the plaintiff who she barely let speak. And she was overly lenient with the defendant who lied multiple times, was callous about wanting to profit off of someone who helped her (which delighted Milian for some dumb reason), and came to court with no evidence. Had Milian let the plaintiff speak about the defendant ghosting her, or asked the storage facility questions about when the plaintiff was removed from the account, this would have been very telling.
First she says she paid in cash because they don't accept checks because "you can cancel them or whatever" and then less than 5 minutes later she's claiming she made payments by check. And then saying she doesn't know what HRA is? Big fat liar, it was here that was collecting HRA benefits. Liar, liar, liar.
All the while JM gave the P the blues and didn’t touch on the D’s testimony discrepancy. IMO, JM gave the D for time because she seem to have favored her from the beginning.
Fair judgment. The plaintiff just wants the money cause she can't be bothered with moving it. The defendant lied about making cash payments then said checks. But even if HRA paid it the plaintiff didn't. If the defendant really had been paying it all and it was abandoned I can understand her selling it off to recoup her money because its her credit that would've been in jeopardy. I bet the plaintiff sold off her belongings the second she was allowed into the storage.
I don’t believe this started as an outright scam on the defendants part to gain the property of the plaintiff for profit I feel sure as many of these cases this started to go downhill from lack of communication and or miscommunication that led to bad feelings Happy the plaintiff will ultimately get her possessions back
That’s how I feel. She only wanted to make a profit AFTER the girl was about to lose her stuff. Maybe she took the girl name off, maybe she didn’t but the girl should have went to the place in person. It’s a two month span with no payment. She knew what was at risk.
I mean of course the defendant would have a right to sell the stuff if the plaintiff had actually abandoned her stuff. She literally lied and said she paid $2,100 for the plaintiff. Yet when the judge kept asking her for proof from a bank statement she said she didn't have it & didn't have online banking. She was lying, she only paid $400 something it was confirmed at the end. Government assistance paid the rest. The defendant's plan the entire time was to lock the plaintiff out of the account, make it look like she abandoned the stuff so she could sell it.
The defendant is not somebody you would ever have as a friend - she stayed in the other woman's' apartment & then tried to take advantage of the storage situation.
![Judge Judy [Episode 11984] Best Amazing Cases Season 2O24 Full Episodes HD](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/lv403N6anAI/mqdefault.jpg)
So, HRA paid $1600 of the $2.1k storage bills and the defendant only paid $490. The only way HRA paid any money is because the defendant LIED and told them that the items in storage were her items, not someone else's. It was a double scam. She defrauded HRA and the plaintiff. As soon as she told the judge "I was trying to make a profit" I knew she couldn't be trusted. I will bet a 6-piece chicken dinner that the plaintiff later found items missing.
😂😂 @ 6 piece chicken dinner
@@NaturallyPrettyBrownK26
Not a 6 piece chicken dinner ...I want Cole slaw and jalapeños with mines 😅
Want my address now?
When she said that she hoped to make a profit I saw it as a refreshing dose of honesty, but also pretty crappy to do.
The defendant is a scammer. She definately locked the plaintiff out of the online account. She got HRA to pay for the unit, under the guise it was hers, and she was going to sell that woman's stuff. If I were the plaintiff, I would call HRA.
The crazy part - the stuff on the unit probably wasn't worth much
This woman definitely needs to be prosecuted. I would bet this is not the only scam she had going on
The defendant scammed her after the plaintiff allowed her to stay with her when she was in need. Disgusting on the defendants part
The plaintiff got scanned by the lying defendant
Dependent is such a Nasty woman. Nasty
Nope
Plot twist: May have done the same to the so called abusive boyfriend
@@devgoodman They ALL claim to have an abusive boyfriend! It's NEVER them.Smdh.
The defendant looked so defeated when Judge Milan told her to look at her bank statements for proof. She didn’t even look 😂
😂😂😂
Right….and talkin bout she doesn’t have online banking? You can set it up….its doesn’t take that long? 🤨🤦🏾♀️ She is a liar 🥴
I personally do not think she looked 😞 defeated.. it appears to me that she doesn’t have a conscious. Look at her she doesn’t appear to feel phased by her conduct she feel entitled to the things in the storage ( remember she wanted to make a profit in order to make a profit you would have to put in the least amount of money down on the storage unit. In this case she put in $490.00 and she had the mitigated gall to sue the lady for $1500. For her own property.. and to top it off she lied to make it appear that the money HRA put in was from her bank account.. that why JM asked her to produce 🧾🧾🧾🧾 from her bank account to prove that she paid the storage fees. She is the kind of scammer who will look for anngles in a ⭕️ to wiggle their way out of their lies.
But people who creat Ponzi schemes to extract money out of people always get caught in a web 🕸️🕸️ of lies. Now remember she did this to her friends who gave her a place to stay when she was homeless.. and this is how she repaid them.. why couldn’t she have said I’ll help you out like you helped me when I was homeless.. isn’t that what friends do for each other they look out for each other in times of need.. how pathetic.😫
American Greed is one of the most powerful show created check out those episodes. This lady has nothing on those scammers.
She claims everyone else lying but her
I was coming to say this exact thing. The defendant wasn't even telling good lies. She was telling lies that were EASILY proven.
DO NOT TRUST ANYONE WITH YOUR VALUABLE BELONGINGS! GREED CHANGES PEOPLE.
I disagree. I say do a better job at finding people you associate with. I am a harsh judge of character yet have a large friend group. I have trusted them with tons of money in cash and them me. Nothing has ever been taken, any loan has been repaid and monetary gifts remain monetary gifts. If you care about yourself you should better assess people you hold close.
And don't leave your items without paying it. Both of them are trifling!!
Legit, love my brothers to death ... 😅 Oooooof
It's the person's fault nothing more.
The defendant literally changed before our eyes.
Right when the manager confirmed HRA paid the defendants energy and voice completely changed 🤣
Right🤣🤣🤣
She helped her have a place when DEFENDANT was in need during her DV & she admitted to wanting to keep it bc she wanted to profit off some else’s items when she wasn’t even paying the rent herself. WOW!
DV = ? 🤔
THE NERVE..!
@@crackerjacks6789domestic violence
I’m sure the domestic claim was a scam too
@@Neenaross214exactly
I can't believe Judge M actually gave her a chance to find the records. She flat out lied and said she didnt know that agency and that SHE made all the payments!! Then she had the nerve to say the "Plaintiff is making that up just to get out of paying her" when she KNEW the agency paid some of that for her. Judge M should have went off on her for that.
Judge Milian was nice to this defendant by allowing her time to retrieve evidence after the fact. I’ve seen her rule against individuals who don’t have their stuff together.
she only did it because she knew the defendant was lying
@@mistiinseattleexactly!!!🤣
She ddnt think she abandoned it, she had every intention of selling it.
Yeah, to not contact her friend (P’s husband) suspppppicious!
She's a thief
She shouldn't have given her two chances. The first one was enough. The plaintiff got scammed!!!
The defendant was scamming
Exactly
How tf did the judge just ignore. That’s insane.
The plaintiff should’ve Sue for pain and suffering..
@@INDIGO.GODDESS_573She wouldn't have won pain and suffering
Becareful who you call your friends.💯
I’d be mad at my husband for this. This is someone he knows.
As soon as she admitted she had planned to profit off her storage, I knew she was problematic
She knows public assistance is paying for the storage unit..
How did she get that??
They won't help you with storage here in California.
@@moniqueengleman873Move to New York?
She knew.
@@fitnessfocused no way. I love my life here.
Never heard of public assistance paying for storage units.
That lady is shady af!!! tried stealing off someone who helped her and then lied to the judge wow
Damn the shame of getting caught on National TV.
Legend has it..She's still looking for proof !
True 😂
She had it out for the plaintiff from the beginning. She was overly nice to the scammer
I caught that too. The way she accused the P of ‘choosing to not go back to her apartment’ and also pretending that she didn’t know what “bicoastal”means.
@@cindymann3673 that bicoastal comment was so weird. Cause the judge is also bicoastal
She’s lying her tail off lol
That was the scam. She put the storage in her name. Removed acces so the girl couldn't pay then when it went into default she signed up with an agency to pay the storage while she sold that girls stuff piecemeal.
RIGHT ✅️ I would never put my item in someone else storage. This is going to be loss for the plaintiff.
Why did the judge give this girl so many chances when it was proven she had lied so many times??? Seems like the judge didn’t care at all during this case the plaintiff could have stolen items and scammed more I feel sorry for the plaintiff.
Free hand outs by a government agency for their personal belongings. I’m in the wrong state.
The defendant is on assistance and the only way to get the government to pay for the plaintiffs storage. The defendant had to put it in her name.. So she lied and said the plaintiff let her put her stuff in her storage, because she was homeless, staying with her/plaintiff, she lied and told the welfare office that the plaintiff moved and the the defendant lied and said the Plaintiff “abandoned” the unit and in order not to lose her (defendant) stuff.. she needed the assistance to keep her own stuff.. so thats how she was able to get the welfare office to pay for it..
That’s exactly what happened.. She a liar and scammer and she should have paid the plaintiff for lying to the judge.. SHE WAS LYING AND IT WAS CLEAR AS GLASS.. not sure why The judge played blind on this case..
People are sick.. she will get hers though.. up man beating the breaks of yo ahh, the plaintiff let you stay in her house, without even knowing you.. bee had the whole place to herself.. and she does this.. THATS BECAUSE SHE DONT KNOW THE PLAINTIFF AND HAD TO EMOTIONAL ATTACHMENT TO HER.. THEREFORE SHE DIDNT CARE.. ALL SHE SAW WAS DOLLARS..
That lady husband asked her to help someone who he knew and obviously trusted.. and she took advantage of the the situation. SMFH
It’s ALWAYS YO OWN PEOPLE, yet they always crying about Dwight man..
At this point ( for decades now).. Nobody does another black person worse than another blk person..
SMFH
@amelia-620Facts
@@INDIGO.GODDESS_573 so she has a job as stated. Airline attendant. Scamming the government. I know why.
Me too !! I live in California and they definitely don't help you with storage fees.
Every time they (the city) cleans up an encampment and tosses everything.
Tents, beds, cooking stoves..... Everything
@amelia-620😂😂 mean
5:45 "I can make a profit off it" (by exploiting her friend for personal gain, the same way any old narcissistic opportunist would.)
The plaintiff has flawless skin.
She does. Very pretty.
The defendant is a habitual liar and used the process to make money off the plantiff's stuff. She's a thief and liar.
Well the plaintiff isn’t that honest herself. She was in contact with manager of the storage facility for a long period of time yet couldn’t make payments? And know she only payed for two months, got money back and her stuff. I mean that’s so weird 😂
I'm shocked the judge didn't acknowledge the fraudulent payments. The plaintiff got her belongings back without having to pay anything past the 2mos. This case was weird.
JM really shows her biases often - from my perspective, she really gave the P undue pressure/sass for the majority of her testimony.
What are you saying? The plaintiff was locked out for 2 months. The defendant wanted to keep her stuff and sell it. In her words the plaintiff “abandoned” her stuff! But the defendant was lying the entire case! So what’s weird?
@markgiles6568 I think you should re-watch the episode. The plaintiff only paid for July/August. Every month there after was paid for fraudulently by either an agency or scammed check. Remember, there was an issue with one of the checks the defendant claimed she paid. BTW the defendant was a piece of 💩. Nevertheless, the plaintiff received access and got her belongings back without paying any additional money. That's why it's weird, in my opinion.
@@nicolesmith583 the defendant took the plaintiff off the account, which she couldn’t get access into the storage unit. So the judge ordered the defendant to take her name off the account so the plaintiff could now pay and/or get her stuff and/or put in another lawsuit if things are missing! Because the defendant said she was just going to sell it. Neither party won. The defendant was just trying to keep the plaintiff stuff and also counter sue for 2,000 when she herself didn’t even pay for the storage unit. The plaintiff couldn’t get any money because she don’t know if all her stuff is in the unit or not to say it’s gone. So that’s a lawsuit for another day. Yes, the plaintiff only paid for 2 months. Yes, the defendant was writing bad checks and lying under oath. But she also took the plaintiff name off the unit to gain access. The plaintiff never got her stuff until after the verdict.
@@nicolesmith583 look at 15:24
I can’t believe she let the lie go on that long 😂
I think she was trying to have her rat herself out lol
I knew it didn’t make sense because she didn’t have money to get her own place in the beginning but has $800 in cash to pay on a storage unit that’s not hers🤔
Good observation!
JM loves to over talk people. She would ask a question and then not give them time to answer then ask another question then gets upset when they don't answer the first question. Damn let them answer the question you're asking them
U haven't watched judge Judy much if u think MM interrupts
She sure does she makes me sick! Rude and loud and arrogant as hell just like Mathis. And to the silly commenter above, bringing someone else to the conversation never changes the facts about the original statement. 🥴🥴🥴
@@jennybarstow1447there isn’t real logic in your statement, because there is no mutual exclusivity between the judges; however, IMO, JJ interrupts when litigants do not answer her questions or try to give more (unnecessary) info.
Why would any organisation pay someone's storage fees? The defendant claims to never have heard of the organisation, yet someone's name is on the application form. This case made zero sense.
Public Assistance programs can and may pay for storage units for those who are unhoused or transitioning to new housing. NYC has some of the best programs in the US.
@@fitnessfocused Lots of shelters don't allow possessions, so that sounds like a life-saver.
Girl she knew.
That's ridiculous if the person is employed as she was, plus she was or is married I suppose her husband had no income. @@fitnessfocused
@@marilynwillett804 I think they just pay random bills as an act of charity but I think the real story is that the defendant knows exactly who that organization is and since the storage unit was in her name they were paying it on her behalf. It would only make sense being that the defendant was a DV situation, she probably claimed she had to go to a domestic violence shelter or stay with family and those are her thins to get them to pay the bill.
Why is the judge surprised that this lady tried to recoup her money by possibly selling the defendant stuff because now she’s responsible for the bill… I don’t know why the judge is so blown away by that!?!
Watch for the red flag because all that glitters is not gold.
The defendant is on assistance and the only way to get the government to pay for the plaintiffs storage. The defendant had to put it in her name.. So she lied and said the plaintiff let her put her stuff in her storage, because she was homeless, staying with her/plaintiff, she lied and told the welfare office that the plaintiff moved and the the defendant lied and said the Plaintiff “abandoned” the unit and in order not to lose her (defendant) stuff.. she needed the assistance to keep her own stuff.. so thats how she was able to get the welfare office to pay for it..
That’s exactly what happened.. She a liar and scammer and she should have paid the plaintiff for lying to the judge.. SHE WAS LYING AND IT WAS CLEAR AS GLASS.. not sure why The judge played blind on this case..
People are sick.. she will get hers though.. up man beating the breaks of yo ahh, the plaintiff let you stay in her house, without even knowing you.. bee had the whole place to herself.. and she does this.. THATS BECAUSE SHE DONT KNOW THE PLAINTIFF AND HAD TO EMOTIONAL ATTACHMENT TO HER.. THEREFORE SHE DIDNT CARE.. ALL SHE SAW WAS DOLLARS..
That lady husband asked her to help someone who he knew and obviously trusted.. and she took advantage of the the situation. SMFH
It’s ALWAYS YO OWN PEOPLE, yet they always crying about Dwight man..
At this point ( for decades now).. Nobody does another black person worse than another blk person..
SMFH
Once the Judge wanted bank statements and paused for recess… the defendant looked as if she had seen a ghost 👻 😁
Lie after lie after lies
Wow. With friends like the defendant who needs enemies.
That could've been her cousin on the phone!!
OR Nephew Tommy from the Steve Harvey Morning Show 😂😂
Wow that defendant is a trip…
OH MY OH MY DEFENDANT!!! WHAT A MESS 🤦🏽♀️🤣
The plaintiff may have a bigger claims then she realize if there are anything of value missing. I'd like a follow up on this case for sure!
Do not trust anyone with your belongings or money period do not even let anyone know what you have.Do not allow anyone/or put anything in your or their name.
Just remember this when ya spouse don't tell u where the stash at 😅😅😅
@@bongoikno4994😬😏
I knew the defendant was shady when she said she thought she can make a profit from the plaintiffs stuff! Like ma’am why was that even on your mind?
Im sorry but the defendants lackadaisical attitude is just irritating 🙄😮💨
She thought she was slick!! Busted!!!
Defendant admits to trying to make a profit off of her the Plaintiff's belongings because she thought Plaintiff had abandon her stuff🤔
5:32 She's saying she thought the stuff was abandoned to defend the fact that she never contacted or reached out to the plaintiff. 5:48
Yep she tried to take credit for the amount the HRA paid in the little 490 that she paid which equal up to 2100, so in theory she was trying to get credit for the 1600 as well,, She lied under oath and that's called stealing
Defendant BUSTED😂😂😂
Yeah, I distrusted the D almost immediately, but then thought maybe the litigants had miscommunications. Meanwhile, JM, IMO was a bit sassy to the P and it was undue.
Probably was the dependents plan from the jump 😂 she thought she was gonna sue for money she didn’t pay lmao she signed up for a program to pay for the storage…she thought she came up on some money lmao
Do the producers of the show call people ahead of time to let them someone from the show will be calling? Greg was a little too cool and ready when Judge Milian got on the phone with him.
I imagine so. I don't think I've ever seen them call someone and they are unavailable, so I expect they would.
I have seen someone not answer @@michelehemlokhexwhite4310
I def think soo 😂 I was thinking the SAME thing!!! Cause it was a coincidence that he was looking at that case in the moment she called 😅😂
@@michelehemlokhexwhite4310Well I also think that Greg was lying when he said that he just started to work there.
How does HRA (aka welfare) pay $1600 for storage!? Wow. Imagine if she would've paid fraud girl too. It's actually pretty disgusting
They're both some scammers. Birds of a feather 😂 The "new manager" just so happens to be looking at "that case right now" 🤔
As a storage manager if a person comes in its put in there name ID has to match the rental. We dont put anyone else as primary. Alot of ppl come in no ID or whatever the reason . Judge is right if it goes in lien status and is auctioned off ( California) after 3 to 4 months of non payments it can affect your credit. We tell ppl this all the time. And we ask are the items your storing yours! Most say yes. So legally its whoever the primary is.
But even if HSA paid it. They paid it on her behalf because of her domestic violence history
The so called friend is greedy . She wasnt there to help but to make money . Greed.
She says she has TD bank but no online banking? Yeah ok sis you’re not fooling anyone 😂. She really tried it and her scam failed miserably.
Home girl said ... "imma give you a week!"
Damn judge ... wow. Scammer.
Well the defendant wasn’t lying she paid for the unit. $490 It was in the update at the end. 16:50
Just run out of the court room when she says, “court is in recess “. Or just stop LYING so damn much!!!
HRA is paying for storage units.. Our money !!!
Lol the defendant loss by lying about HRA payments. Like just say you were trying to steal this girls stuff
She’s funny! “Hello (whomever), try not to faint or wet yourself, but this is Judge M!!” -lol! Oh my, I don’t know who looks more ridiculous, her or Dougie with his nutty questions like “do you understand you lost!! You get nothing!!! (Or whatever the silly question is!) 😮😂
She never said that stupidity what is your problem.
She/he didn't drink the kool-aid like YOU obviously did. @@marilynwillett804
Defendant is a liar
😆😆😆Milian needs to get over herself.
@@marilynwillett804 - uh, it’s called “sarcasm”, ever hear of it? Oh and she never said “don’t be nervous or anything, but this is Judge Milian” -that’s what I was joking about!! Geeze, get a sense of humor! Sooo, I guess my question to you is: what is your problem??
Defendant is clearly lying. It’s easy to log on to your bank to show charges.
The judge usually says if the defendant doesn't have any proof they lose but in this case I can't believe that she's actually giving her a chance to prove her case at another time...
Well we know why! She just doesn’t want to easily allow the plaintiff to win her case SMDH. She ALWAYS makes it difficult for some! ALWAYS!
She doesn't like giving black women large amounts of money. Idc. I said what I said. I honestly tried to not see it. But she does it every time
She wasn't making the payments at all she just got the call when the storage went into default because it was in her name and tried to take advantage and sell that woman's things without calling her to let her know what was going on. A scammer that's watched too much Storage Wars
The nerve of this woman. She’s/abandon her stuff.
lol I bet she lied about the DV (if anything, probably was the one doing it), and I bet she already picked out the good stuff from the storage unit. Why would she pay for the unit for months, while not selling things already? It would have made no sense.
The plaintiff just wanted the money at this point. She didn’t expect the judge to resolve it.
Blackie chocolate didnt pay nuttin😅😅😅
Facts! Lol
That defendant know she lying!!
This ruling sucked. Milian was unfair to the plaintiff who she barely let speak. And she was overly lenient with the defendant who lied multiple times, was callous about wanting to profit off of someone who helped her (which delighted Milian for some dumb reason), and came to court with no evidence.
Had Milian let the plaintiff speak about the defendant ghosting her, or asked the storage facility questions about when the plaintiff was removed from the account, this would have been very telling.
I agree and to top it off she tried to get the plaintiff to reimburse her for money she didn’t pay. So a liar and a thief in my book.
First she says she paid in cash because they don't accept checks because "you can cancel them or whatever" and then less than 5 minutes later she's claiming she made payments by check.
And then saying she doesn't know what HRA is? Big fat liar, it was here that was collecting HRA benefits. Liar, liar, liar.
All the while JM gave the P the blues and didn’t touch on the D’s testimony discrepancy. IMO, JM gave the D for time because she seem to have favored her from the beginning.
@@cindymann3673 I don't think she favored the D at all! I think she was toying with her like a cat does a mouse
She stole and sold some of her stuff
yep, the defendant is greedy and a scammer
Never let someone put your name on their stuff / bills. It's nuts. You're just asking to get screwed 😂
What’s crazy is that when her man was supposedly beating her which was probably another lie she let her stay with her
Name one "sistah" that doesn't claim to have been in an abusive relationship? It's NEVER them!
"You put the "rage" in storage". 😂
What a "friend...."
Hurt people hurt people 😢
can't trust anyone in NY period ..
not true, there are many exceptions but definitely do not trust any trump
Defendant about to look stupid when she come back
WOW she was greedy and blatantly lied. Unreal. People these days always trying to get something for nothing
Don’t understand why JM gave the defendant time to get proof she paid after she lied about the hra pymts🙄
Fair judgment. The plaintiff just wants the money cause she can't be bothered with moving it. The defendant lied about making cash payments then said checks. But even if HRA paid it the plaintiff didn't. If the defendant really had been paying it all and it was abandoned I can understand her selling it off to recoup her money because its her credit that would've been in jeopardy. I bet the plaintiff sold off her belongings the second she was allowed into the storage.
Defendant trying to get money from plaintiff with funds paid by the welfare dept. Smfh! Messy!
greedy defendant…..definitely not a friend
I don’t believe this started as an outright scam on the defendants part to gain the property of the plaintiff for profit
I feel sure as many of these cases this started to go downhill from lack of communication and or miscommunication that led to bad feelings
Happy the plaintiff will ultimately get her possessions back
Agreed that defendant is a Weasle
That’s how I feel. She only wanted to make a profit AFTER the girl was about to lose her stuff. Maybe she took the girl name off, maybe she didn’t but the girl should have went to the place in person. It’s a two month span with no payment. She knew what was at risk.
“That’s another case!”
I have no doubt the items were picked over.
I still don't think the Plantiff paid and let it go into lien.
You could see the defendants soul leave her body when he confirmed the HRA was making payments
The defendant has most likely picked through the unit.
Wow😮,so the defendant did win her case.
So nice to see 3 sistas in the court with natural hair ❤❤😊
While dicking the plaintiff 😂
Dear black people...why does EVERYTHING have to be about hair???? 😅
@@a.konadu4010 Because of your fake WIG obsession! Every other race is proud of their hair. The very same hair YOU covet! Get it??
At least that defendant is very honest
I mean if I had to pay 1000+ ofcourseee I’m selling that shit are u kidding me
I mean of course the defendant would have a right to sell the stuff if the plaintiff had actually abandoned her stuff. She literally lied and said she paid $2,100 for the plaintiff. Yet when the judge kept asking her for proof from a bank statement she said she didn't have it & didn't have online banking. She was lying, she only paid $400 something it was confirmed at the end. Government assistance paid the rest. The defendant's plan the entire time was to lock the plaintiff out of the account, make it look like she abandoned the stuff so she could sell it.
I CANNOT BELIEVE THAT THIS LADY LET HER GO FIND EVIDENCE N THE FACT SHE ADMITTED TO TRYNA GET PROFFIT BUT THE JUDGE IS teLLING HER TO SUCK IT UP
“That’s ok, I’m going to give you time” the judge says in singsong voice as did the spider to the fly….
The defendant is not somebody you would ever have as a friend - she stayed in the other woman's' apartment & then tried to take advantage of the storage situation.
How does the state pay for storage smh
So,the Plaintiff is a Flight Attendant and the GOVERNMENT,aka TAXPAYERS are paying her storage bills?...really?......UNBELIEVABLE!!!!!
By 3:04 , you realize that neither one of them will give you a simple straight answer!
So he just happened to be looking at that account