What people are forgetting too is Haaland plays different for City in comparison to how he played for Dortmund where he was constantly running in behind
A player like Isak can never put up Haaland's numbers, regardless of quality, simply because he doesn't have that single-minded focus on getting served in the box. He participates in the buildup, often leading it. As a consequence players next to Isak, like Gordon, scores a lot too. Haaland is focused on timing his runs while his team mates are creating chances. So they're two completely different players playing in the same position. Which makes a comparison tricky and kind meaningless, IMO.
Haaland is an out & out goal scorer... the epitome of the 'give it to the big man up top' style of play. Isak, is a much better rounded centre-forward... he's as comfortable setting up other players as putting them away himself, able to cross & dribble the ball as typified by his assist for Jacob Murphy against Everton a couple of seasons back.
It's a bit like the old Henry or Shearer debate in that Henry was the better footballer but you're picking Shearer regardless. Haaland is just out of form currently but he'll be back. You're not replacing 111 goals in 125 games for "he can dribble past players easier". If the old 4-4-2 was still in fashion they'd be great together up front
Im a Newcastle fan, but comparing the 2 of them isn't fair on either. Halaand is a goal machine, he doesn't do much else, you give him the ball and he will score. All strikers will habe ups and downs, hes not different. Isak is a different type, he get involed he offers intelligent passes and is involved in build up. The better striker depends on what your team actually needs. For arsenal i reckon a Haaland type would actually be better they have players that are brilliant at building up, they just need the finisher.
I think ppl are confused about the question. When it comes to having the ball at your feet in the box, Haaland is unstoppable. But that's not the question. It says an all round striker. Isak doesn't just score goals, he creates them too, plus he's got the left winger position in his locker. When's the last time Haaland got an assist? When does Haaland play on the wings? Haaland's a natural scorer, but Isak gets the prize for versatility
Haarland 86 appearances 79 goals 14 assists Isak 70 appearances 44 goals and 7 assists. Haarland has won more penalties got a better shot success percentage created more big chances and has been dispossessed less times than isak. Plus he’s been caught offside half the amount of times that Isak is. Facts don’t lie
@liberalslayer7220 you didn't listen to a word I said. I admitted Haaland is the best striker. Every fact you put up is correct as far as i know. So what exactly do you think I'm arguing with? As I said, Haaland scores better than anyone, but that's all he does. He can't take on other roles. Isak doesn't have that, but he does have versatility that Haaland lacks
@stevecooke2893 so supplying more assists and bigger chances created has won more penalties and is dispossessed less. The fact that Manchester City typically doesn't play to Haarlands strengths. By playing the early pass in behind the defence like he used to play in Germany.
@ I’m a little bit confused on the point about how much money has been invested into the two clubs. The fact that Newcastle has spent half a billion in transfers since Howe has been manager. Which is about the same amount as what Manchester City have spent but city’s also sold players to run at a profit so in terms of net spend Newcastle have spent more money. Howe has literally replaced the whole team in transfer deals
Halaand as a player is built for scoring goals. I defend Halaand a lot in other context. However, you're always underwhelmed when you watch him against the big clubs. He's mostly anonymous. If City and Newcastle play only against the Big 6 in the PL and you collect their goalscoring stats, I'd be close and I dare say Isak outscores him. More importantly though, Isak would come out man of the match in more games than Halaand would against bigger oppositions. That's simply because Isak has more in his locker when the goals don't come in a game. As a Chelsea fan, that's why I would always rate Hazard as the best player in the PL for the duration he played in the competition. In games against the big 6, Hazard's stats was even better than against sides lower. He'd be MOTM in those games year on year that it was ridiculous. He doesn't have to score or assist in games for everyone to rave about the performances. Isak has that over Halaand every week.
I'm a huge fan of Isak but these british media are so del ūded and reactionary 😂 after 3 months Isak is the best striker?? These guys ball knowledge is hilarious ASF.. Haaland might not be a flashy and technically great striker but he's a generational traditional striker, fox in the box predator.. Isak is the best technically great all-round striker in the world and I'd choose Isak becuz he fits Barça philosophy but Haaland is THE guy..He can score 3, 4, 5 goals in 1 game without having more than 5 touches, at the end of the day, he got the goals
@@Triple_X_X Do you just want to argue because you're a strawman? Glazed Halaand all day only to turn around and say you'd prefer Isak because of his all round play and fitting Barca's philosophy. Do you love to hear only yourself have an opinion? Isak only been good for 3 months?? But I'm sure you are one of those fanboys who thick Yamal is better than Saka, Foden, and Palmer despite him breastfeeding only a couple of months ago.
Haaland is a better finisher, but can't create his own goal. Isak is a more all round striker, but isn't as good a finisher (he can miss more chances). You're talking about comparing the cream of the crop though, so being second to Haaland is fine.
he scored 21 league goals in a team nowhere near as good as city, Haarland should be scoring with all the service he gets. as i said earlier he was piss poor when city lost 11 games what was haarland doing then sweet fa.
Let’s be honest it’s like the Salah vs Ronaldo debate. No one comes close to Ronaldo as a RW in premier league or Haaland at striker currently in prem. but people like to just compare. Isak will never get the amount of goals Haaland does
@ 🤣🤣 and that’s why your a bum on benefits and not a manager in the premier league mate. Aguero who is top 3 greatest ST in premier league history got no where near Haaland numbers in “this Man City team”
Comparisons are pointless and daft. Haaland's game is completely different. He's like Lineker or Greaves in as much as he might only touch the ball 3 times in 90mins but score 2 goals. Isak is like Salah or Henry as he can play wide and contribute to the build up. Nobody can argue with Haaland's record even though Isak is a better footballer.
Its like henry said, pep is to controlling, we dont know exactly what haaland is capable of because pep retricts his movement, any other club would have him run the front line snd not just stand in the centre
Haaland is a better target man and relies heavily on his team mates, while Isak is more of versatile, can create his own chances and is better all round.
@@michaelmcdougall943 'Nick the Newcastle fan', no Geordie accent, praises Talk sport then proceeds to talk about Isak reminding him of Henry, that he's better than Haaland, talks about Arsenal being happy to finish in CL places and says Arsenal 'missed a trick' not signing him. Aye right. 'Nick the Newcastle Fan' didn't talk once about Newcastle or the match last night. All slanted towards Arsenal and Isak leading the conversation to be Arsenal should sign the best striker in the league Isak so they can win the PL. I don't buy him as genuine.
😂😂😂 I'm a huge fan of Isak but he's NOWHERE near Mbappe..stop this Prem bias and LaLiga jealousy.. I'm a Barça fan but Mbappe is way clear WTF are you cracking?
@Triple_X_X WTF are you on about? I'm looking at both players (Mbappe and Isak) now not what they have done before. Also, I'm comparing central forward performances from both men. Mbappe has played much better before than what he's currently showing. And Isak is playing better than he's ever produced. When you stripe away the goals and emotional glazing you feel for Mbappe, it is clear Isak has better: First touch, Striker IQ, Finesse, Technique, Elegance, Control, Passing, Dribbling, and Creativity. I have watched Mbappe for Real Madrid and he looks lethargic, heavy, and can't beat a man for his life unless his pace can get away from defenders. Maybe Mbappe has more goals this season than Isak, but I don't look at Mbappe playing right now and say I'm watching the better player overall than Isak. Your emotional ranting about Laliga Vs PL was hilarious to read. I don't know why you feel slighted. Me saying I'd have Isak instead of Mbappe as my central forward doesn't equate to Isak is better than anyone in Laliga. Heck, I don't even think Mbappe is the best player in his own team. Even the Laliga president, Javier Tebas KNOWS the PL is the best domestic competition in the world and competed by the best collection of football clubs in the world.
With haaland if hes not scoring he offers little when you see him with norway with "lesser" players and not the same service he gets at club level hes pretty average
@Photosoflife almost half of those have been against teams like kosovo Kazakhstan Gibraltar Cyprus Luxembourg and armenia he has 1 goal against Holland and 1 against Denmark he's not faced any real quality
@Detroiy2k It’s actually the very opposite. People who say things like Haaland needs constant service and is only a penalty box poacher never saw him at Dortmund or Salzburg. Let alone in just the past few matches for City. Haaland is an absolute monster in space and on the counterattack. He would naturally fit in with sides like Newcastle, Liverpool, and Tottenham much more than City.
Different type of strikers. Isak has been in incredible form but he needs to do it for longer and at the highest level to be labeled "better" than Haaland. Haaland has been a machine wherever he has gone.
That’s a funny story. Isak is having the season of his life , haaland having a really poor season, yet haaland has 16 league goals and your man isak , on fire, world beater, compared to Henry, is on 13 goals. But isak is much better 😂😂😂
They are both strikers ,end of..if u ask haaland to do what isak does,he can't,otherwise he'd be doing it..isak is a proper player..haaland would struggle at Newcastle
Isak the better all around striker. Thats clear Haaland a better finisher. Thats also clear I'm a nufc fan i watch nufc every week isak misses a lot also.
Nope. Get into the semantics of what makes a great striker all you like, at the end of it all they are measured by the number of goals scored. Haaland is far better.
Mcoist talks some b*llox at times. A strikers main job is to put the ball in the onion bag. Haarland does that better than anybody at the moment on the planet. Stop this talk of all round shite. For a team that’s at the top of its game he’s the guy that will finish off your good play.
Put Haaland and Isak on the market today, Bayern, Barca, Real dont get near Isak.. Haaland didn't score for how many games ? Still Isak couldn't get near him..Lets stop the stupidity now
Guys won the treble, 2 prems, over a hundred goals in under 3 seasons at city. But doesnt score for a few games so now Haaland would be 2nd choice at Newcastle 😂
@Detroiy2k Are you talking about the same Isak? He is similar to Haaland when creating for himself..I cant remember 1 goal this season where he scored by himself..Correct me if I am wrong. Haaland would struggle at Newcastle? You are damm right, City is the only club he has played for, smh
Are we getting that silly now? The current holder of the PL golden boot the last couple seasons & on course to collect possible third consecutive one yet we putting him down under Isak? That just end it rightly there boys I understand you trying to run a channel but coming from you couple muppets is a bit too much to even laugh it off👎bad podcasting
Harland is a better goal scorer he’s not a better footballer than Isak. Harland can’t do what Isak does.
100% my thoughts too. Haaland can't create a goal from nothing for himself or take it round 4/5 players, but he's the better finisher
Isak can't do what haaland does
@@Charlieb82yes he can put keep pushing that lie if you want
@@fifty-five6929isak plays with gykores aswell
@@Maccycityblue He literally is doing what Haaland does he's scoring a goal a game right now.
Haaland is completely off the charts and generational.
City: 125 matches, 111 goals, 15 assists
Dortmund: 89 matches, 86 goals, 23 assists
Salzburg: 27 matches, 29 goals, 7 assists
Norway: 39 matches, 38 goals, 4 assists
Premier League: 86 matches, 79 goals, 13 assists
Champions League: 45 matches, 46 goals, 5 assists
Total: 282 matches, 264 goals, 49 assists
In a city squad. So what do u think if players swapped teams for last 3 seasons 😮
@@jamiecummings9666He literally gave stats of Dortmund, Salzburg as well. He isn't good just cause of city squad.
What people are forgetting too is Haaland plays different for City in comparison to how he played for Dortmund where he was constantly running in behind
@@jamiecummings9666 Remind me of Isak's incredible time at Dortmund
A player like Isak can never put up Haaland's numbers, regardless of quality, simply because he doesn't have that single-minded focus on getting served in the box. He participates in the buildup, often leading it. As a consequence players next to Isak, like Gordon, scores a lot too. Haaland is focused on timing his runs while his team mates are creating chances. So they're two completely different players playing in the same position. Which makes a comparison tricky and kind meaningless, IMO.
Haaland is an out & out goal scorer... the epitome of the 'give it to the big man up top' style of play.
Isak, is a much better rounded centre-forward... he's as comfortable setting up other players as putting them away himself, able to cross & dribble the ball as typified by his assist for Jacob Murphy against Everton a couple of seasons back.
It's a bit like the old Henry or Shearer debate in that Henry was the better footballer but you're picking Shearer regardless. Haaland is just out of form currently but he'll be back. You're not replacing 111 goals in 125 games for "he can dribble past players easier". If the old 4-4-2 was still in fashion they'd be great together up front
Us geordies always knew this time was gonna come u can see how Isak creates and doesnt just wait in the box
The fact that Haaland is the one everyone compares anyone else to, is all you need to know
haaland beats any sticker on goals but what Isak brings to the table thou is way more important
Right now Isak is the best in Europe !!!!!
Good but best in Europe .I don't think so
Hes a better Centre Forward but certainly not a better striker.
Im a Newcastle fan, but comparing the 2 of them isn't fair on either. Halaand is a goal machine, he doesn't do much else, you give him the ball and he will score. All strikers will habe ups and downs, hes not different. Isak is a different type, he get involed he offers intelligent passes and is involved in build up. The better striker depends on what your team actually needs. For arsenal i reckon a Haaland type would actually be better they have players that are brilliant at building up, they just need the finisher.
Stay humble, Haaland fanboys...Isak is king! 👑
I think ppl are confused about the question. When it comes to having the ball at your feet in the box, Haaland is unstoppable.
But that's not the question. It says an all round striker. Isak doesn't just score goals, he creates them too, plus he's got the left winger position in his locker. When's the last time Haaland got an assist? When does Haaland play on the wings?
Haaland's a natural scorer, but Isak gets the prize for versatility
Haarland 86 appearances 79 goals 14 assists Isak 70 appearances 44 goals and 7 assists. Haarland has won more penalties got a better shot success percentage created more big chances and has been dispossessed less times than isak. Plus he’s been caught offside half the amount of times that Isak is. Facts don’t lie
@liberalslayer7220 you didn't listen to a word I said. I admitted Haaland is the best striker. Every fact you put up is correct as far as i know. So what exactly do you think I'm arguing with?
As I said, Haaland scores better than anyone, but that's all he does. He can't take on other roles. Isak doesn't have that, but he does have versatility that Haaland lacks
@stevecooke2893 so supplying more assists and bigger chances created has won more penalties and is dispossessed less. The fact that Manchester City typically doesn't play to Haarlands strengths. By playing the early pass in behind the defence like he used to play in Germany.
@@liberalslayer7220those stats if anything shine for isak he plays for Newcastle not a treble winning side who have spend hundreds of millions
@ I’m a little bit confused on the point about how much money has been invested into the two clubs. The fact that Newcastle has spent half a billion in transfers since Howe has been manager. Which is about the same amount as what Manchester City have spent but city’s also sold players to run at a profit so in terms of net spend Newcastle have spent more money. Howe has literally replaced the whole team in transfer deals
Halaand as a player is built for scoring goals. I defend Halaand a lot in other context.
However, you're always underwhelmed when you watch him against the big clubs. He's mostly anonymous. If City and Newcastle play only against the Big 6 in the PL and you collect their goalscoring stats, I'd be close and I dare say Isak outscores him.
More importantly though, Isak would come out man of the match in more games than Halaand would against bigger oppositions. That's simply because Isak has more in his locker when the goals don't come in a game.
As a Chelsea fan, that's why I would always rate Hazard as the best player in the PL for the duration he played in the competition. In games against the big 6, Hazard's stats was even better than against sides lower. He'd be MOTM in those games year on year that it was ridiculous. He doesn't have to score or assist in games for everyone to rave about the performances. Isak has that over Halaand every week.
It would be a unbelievable strike partnership
We talking 60+ goals a season easy.
I'm a huge fan of Isak but these british media are so del ūded and reactionary 😂 after 3 months Isak is the best striker?? These guys ball knowledge is hilarious ASF..
Haaland might not be a flashy and technically great striker but he's a generational traditional striker, fox in the box predator..
Isak is the best technically great all-round striker in the world and I'd choose Isak becuz he fits Barça philosophy but Haaland is THE guy..He can score 3, 4, 5 goals in 1 game without having more than 5 touches, at the end of the day, he got the goals
Norway lost to Scotland Halaand ghosted 😂
@@Triple_X_X
Do you just want to argue because you're a strawman?
Glazed Halaand all day only to turn around and say you'd prefer Isak because of his all round play and fitting Barca's philosophy.
Do you love to hear only yourself have an opinion?
Isak only been good for 3 months??
But I'm sure you are one of those fanboys who thick Yamal is better than Saka, Foden, and Palmer despite him breastfeeding only a couple of months ago.
Haaland is a better finisher, but can't create his own goal. Isak is a more all round striker, but isn't as good a finisher (he can miss more chances). You're talking about comparing the cream of the crop though, so being second to Haaland is fine.
he scored 21 league goals in a team nowhere near as good as city, Haarland should be scoring with all the service he gets. as i said earlier he was piss poor when city lost 11 games what was haarland doing then sweet fa.
You constantly rant about how much you hate British media, but you spend all your time watching and commenting on it. What a weirdo.
Funny how come he has 0 major honours to his name and Haaland still has more goals than him in what is a terrible season for him
There has never been a striker like Haaland anywhere anytime. Undoubtedly the best there’s ever been.
There's never been prolific strikers are you serious?
@@skilla20 Your mind is playing games with You.
As a united fan nooooooo, Isak is no we're near near Haaland and never will be.
Whos the strikers who scores more goals? haaland!! End of chat
Let’s be honest it’s like the Salah vs Ronaldo debate. No one comes close to Ronaldo as a RW in premier league or Haaland at striker currently in prem. but people like to just compare. Isak will never get the amount of goals Haaland does
@ArchieSimpson-s8e and Halaand will never be the best player on the pitch without scoring a goal. That's how you know a one trick pony.
Put Isak in that Man City team and Al bet he does get the same if not more numbers than Haaland.
@@josephajibowo-wp2rwand Isak will
Never be able to lace garlands boots… that’s how you know Isak is 10% the player Haaland is
@ 🤣🤣 and that’s why your a bum on benefits and not a manager in the premier league mate. Aguero who is top 3 greatest ST in premier league history got no where near Haaland numbers in “this Man City team”
Someone pin this message..Come May, Ally McCoist will say Haaland is the best striker in the world and act like this video right here never happened 😂
Comparisons are pointless and daft. Haaland's game is completely different. He's like Lineker or Greaves in as much as he might only touch the ball 3 times in 90mins but score 2 goals. Isak is like Salah or Henry as he can play wide and contribute to the build up.
Nobody can argue with Haaland's record even though Isak is a better footballer.
It's Henry vs. shearer history repeating its self
Its like henry said, pep is to controlling, we dont know exactly what haaland is capable of because pep retricts his movement, any other club would have him run the front line snd not just stand in the centre
Isak is a better technician but Haaland is more of a beast
Haaland is a better target man and relies heavily on his team mates, while Isak is more of versatile, can create his own chances and is better all round.
That first caller is not a Newcastle fan 😂😂 complete set up.
Definitely had a Mackem twang about him like
@@michaelmcdougall943 'Nick the Newcastle fan', no Geordie accent, praises Talk sport then proceeds to talk about Isak reminding him of Henry, that he's better than Haaland, talks about Arsenal being happy to finish in CL places and says Arsenal 'missed a trick' not signing him. Aye right. 'Nick the Newcastle Fan' didn't talk once about Newcastle or the match last night. All slanted towards Arsenal and Isak leading the conversation to be Arsenal should sign the best striker in the league Isak so they can win the PL. I don't buy him as genuine.
Isak is an all round striker indeed and Halaand is not but still the truth is that Halaad is above Isak
Isak is the best central forward in the world. He offers more than Halaand and is better than Mbappe at everything Mbappe is decent at except scoring.
😂😂😂 I'm a huge fan of Isak but he's NOWHERE near Mbappe..stop this Prem bias and LaLiga jealousy.. I'm a Barça fan but Mbappe is way clear WTF are you cracking?
So Isak is better than Isak ? 😲
@Triple_X_X
WTF are you on about?
I'm looking at both players (Mbappe and Isak) now not what they have done before.
Also, I'm comparing central forward performances from both men. Mbappe has played much better before than what he's currently showing. And Isak is playing better than he's ever produced. When you stripe away the goals and emotional glazing you feel for Mbappe, it is clear Isak has better:
First touch,
Striker IQ,
Finesse,
Technique,
Elegance,
Control,
Passing,
Dribbling, and
Creativity.
I have watched Mbappe for Real Madrid and he looks lethargic, heavy, and can't beat a man for his life unless his pace can get away from defenders. Maybe Mbappe has more goals this season than Isak, but I don't look at Mbappe playing right now and say I'm watching the better player overall than Isak.
Your emotional ranting about Laliga Vs PL was hilarious to read. I don't know why you feel slighted. Me saying I'd have Isak instead of Mbappe as my central forward doesn't equate to Isak is better than anyone in Laliga. Heck, I don't even think Mbappe is the best player in his own team.
Even the Laliga president, Javier Tebas KNOWS the PL is the best domestic competition in the world and competed by the best collection of football clubs in the world.
@@robbiekop7 Thanks, ...more than Halaand I meant to say 😏
I do worry Madrid will go for him.
With haaland if hes not scoring he offers little when you see him with norway with "lesser" players and not the same service he gets at club level hes pretty average
@davidgalbraith694
By "pretty average" you mean 38 goals and 4 assists in 39 appearances for Norway?
@Photosoflife almost half of those have been against teams like kosovo Kazakhstan Gibraltar Cyprus Luxembourg and armenia he has 1 goal against Holland and 1 against Denmark he's not faced any real quality
He would struggle at Newcastle, haaland needs constant service..isak can do both..callum Wilson would do what haaland did at city
@davidgalbraith694
So if it’s that easy then where are all the other international strikers putting up a goal per match average? Hmm?
@Detroiy2k
It’s actually the very opposite. People who say things like Haaland needs constant service and is only a penalty box poacher never saw him at Dortmund or Salzburg. Let alone in just the past few matches for City. Haaland is an absolute monster in space and on the counterattack. He would naturally fit in with sides like Newcastle, Liverpool, and Tottenham much more than City.
I don't think there's a team in the world at the moment that Isak doesn't walk into
Different type of strikers. Isak has been in incredible form but he needs to do it for longer and at the highest level to be labeled "better" than Haaland. Haaland has been a machine wherever he has gone.
Isak makes Newcastle great. That is the difference.
Haaland bang average footballer. Isak is the best in the world atm
Best in the world?? 😂 Have you heard of Lewandowski and Kane?
He is not even the best Swedish striker 😂
@@Photosoflife he was obviously reffering to Isak.
@@Photosoflife Gyökeres and isak mate. Take time to understand a comment.
@@eL--RaL Kane 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Ally mcoist the best commentator needs to do moretoon games
Baby Faced Assasin II is a different style of Striker.
That’s a funny story. Isak is having the season of his life , haaland having a really poor season, yet haaland has 16 league goals and your man isak , on fire, world beater, compared to Henry, is on 13 goals. But isak is much better 😂😂😂
Haaland is a better striker for me. Isak is a much better footballer and team player though.
Ally, Have a look at the goal scoring records ! Haaland is double that of Isaks per game!
They are both strikers ,end of..if u ask haaland to do what isak does,he can't,otherwise he'd be doing it..isak is a proper player..haaland would struggle at Newcastle
Rubbish so how he's not struggling at Norway and every where he plays since he was a kid 🙄
Haaland is finished. There's a new kid on the block 👍
Down ta ONE MAN wor Eddie!!!!!
Isak the better all around striker. Thats clear
Haaland a better finisher. Thats also clear
I'm a nufc fan i watch nufc every week isak misses a lot also.
If it's not Arsenal I cheer for Newcastle.
No , no, no give your head a wobble. Haaland no 1 striker on the planet.
Gyokeres better than both.
Nope. Get into the semantics of what makes a great striker all you like, at the end of it all they are measured by the number of goals scored. Haaland is far better.
Everyone saying Haaland is a better player just remember.... stay humble 😜
Isak all day
warra treble for isak
2 players bought. From a farmer's league weird
Mcoist talks some b*llox at times. A strikers main job is to put the ball in the onion bag. Haarland does that better than anybody at the moment on the planet. Stop this talk of all round shite. For a team that’s at the top of its game he’s the guy that will finish off your good play.
Put Haaland and Isak on the market today, Bayern, Barca, Real dont get near Isak.. Haaland didn't score for how many games ? Still Isak couldn't get near him..Lets stop the stupidity now
Guys won the treble, 2 prems, over a hundred goals in under 3 seasons at city. But doesnt score for a few games so now Haaland would be 2nd choice at Newcastle 😂
But u have to play to haaland 1 strength, scoring, he ain't creating his own goals or for others
Haaland would struggle at Newcastle
@Detroiy2k Are you talking about the same Isak? He is similar to Haaland when creating for himself..I cant remember 1 goal this season where he scored by himself..Correct me if I am wrong. Haaland would struggle at Newcastle? You are damm right, City is the only club he has played for, smh
😂 Haaland is average
Watch another game kid, you struggle with this one.
lol
TBF McCoist is half cut most the time
To be compared to Haaland is praise indeed for Isak both great strikers but Haaland wins the battle for me.
Are we getting that silly now? The current holder of the PL golden boot the last couple seasons & on course to collect possible third consecutive one yet we putting him down under Isak? That just end it rightly there boys I understand you trying to run a channel but coming from you couple muppets is a bit too much to even laugh it off👎bad podcasting
What a Pile of BS from Talksport , Isaak isn't worth half of Haaland, the goals prove it FFS
So as a Norwegian I love to see Isak play. Haaland is great but as a team player I have to go with Isak.