It's a decent futuristic racing game and some of the tracks are awesome but it doesn't come close to wipeout which is super smooth and super fast with no slow down at certain points on the track (what's that all about) I have had the game from the start and they still haven't addressed what I would call a major flaw in the handling of the craft and the flow of the tracks.
@@dereksmall4311 they may have been involved but wipeout is still better the lack of features and tracks alone makes it inferior wipeout has been going for so long it is totally refined and they have a lot of tracks to fall back on and it's a polished experience. but pacer as is it's a bare-bone experience at best. but it is still one of the best future racing games on the PC it's just lacking in polish and content.
@@h3onyx587 i agree but my complaint is the game sudenly slows down at certain points on the track for no reason.so its a matter of choice and i chose not to play a raceing game that does that,any raceing game. i still have it in my steam libary i just dont play it much if ever.
The new dev that acquired the game and it's IP rights publicly admitted it's dead forever, plus the one of the old producers are still suing and causing a fuss which just makes funding for any improvement or sequel practically impossible. Dead game, literally.
The concept of this type of game was originally presented in 1998 by the "Church of Electronic Entertainment" studio. The game was called "Mars Maniac Demo" and later as the full game "Space Haste 2" by "Dreams Interactive". I was a huge fan of Mars Maniac and spent long hours playing single car / single track. The main difficulty was getting each lap faster than before. My one-time record is 51 laps and an average of 20-30 laps without warm-up. I still have the game files saved somewhere on old PC.
the original wipeout, which this game is based on, preceded Space Haste 2 by more than half a decade. wipeout released on the PS1 in 1995, space haste 2 came out in 2001. developers who worked on the wipeout franchise worked on this pacer game. this game has NOTHING to do with space haste. its not inspired by it & not related to in in the slightest. if anything, wipeout inspired space haste. space haste looks more like extreme g than wipeout. another game that precedes space haste 2 by at least 4 years.
I kinda wish Wipeout (and subsequently, Pacer) never implemented mag tracks. Clinging to extremely vertical track segments feels more like Extreme-G and less like Wipeout. I always preferred the heavy, drifty feeling of Wip3out and Wipeout Pure. It felt like you were piloting a real vehicle skidding along on air, and you had to plan your turns long in advance. It made the more technical tracks a nerve-wracking experience in the best way, and it made simple tracks more laid back and speed-focused. Wipeout Pulse just kinda ruined it, even worse than Fusion did. The racecraft were too responsive and too maneuverable, making it feel a little more like F-Zero, and the aforementioned mag tracks added a bit of an Extreme-G feel. It was still a fun game, but it just wasn’t Wipeout anymore. And Wipeout HD, HD Fury, and 2048 did nothing to fix it.
@@hyperx72 And they shouldn't. The little side thrusters on the rear are meant to push the craft's rear inward so that the craft can have a better angle and steer faster in corners. Right now, the way they boost makes no sense.
@@Soliye. You're wrong. On a left turn the left thruster needs to fire to push the back end out to the right so the nose angles to the left allowing for a tighter turn. If you think it's wrong you don't understand how physics work 😂
@@liamriley9816 I think we’re both saying the same thing, but my initial comment didn’t explain the problem properly. At high speed cornering, the rear-side thrusters work correctly. But when doing micro movements at high speed or cornering at much lower speed I feel like there should be side-front thrusters pushing the front. Right now the right thrusters are on when slowly turning left. That would make the craft go side way, or turn in the opposite direction. The flaps wouldn’t help either in these slow corners. So in the end, the thrusters are working when in a long corner, but don’t make sense at low and micro mouvements. Could be fixed with front thrusters. Again I might be wrong, but my years of Kerbal makes me feel like something’s off. Rechecked and yeah, when he does micro adjusting the craft’s rear leans *toward* the side the thruster is on. It fixes it self when he reaches a certain “drift” angle.
@@R8GamesLtd Looks great. Huge Wipeout fan here. Any chance of a Series X enhancement down the road? Would be nice to not have to choose between performance/graphcs mode (though i would pick performance every time.)
OKAY..... so nobody asked me to air my opinions but IDC ..... I'll be brutally honest anyway: THE FEEL - Feels like the devs were experimenting with a new direction for the anti-grav racing genre -- fail. NEW IDEAS - It introduce some new mechanics such as testing prototype upgrades at certain points throughout the campaign..... [starts snoring...] SENSE OF SPEED - Feels like i'm driving Ms. Daisy.... enough said. SFX - the purpose of sfx is to engage the player's awareness of what's happening..... I was bored and under-stimulated MUSIC - This is a big part of giving racing games a sense of speed.... I can tell by this game your budget was tight, and the investors were penny pinchers forcing you to find a bunch of nobodies to produce uninspiring tracks for this game. REPLAY VALUE - I only replay games I actually enjoy... this one not so much.
![Redout: Enhanced Edition Gameplay (PC UHD) [4K60FPS]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/712uX6oVYJI/mqdefault.jpg)
feels like wipeout fusion but without being bombarded by weapons as soon as you start
wonderful, now everyone can experience how fun wipeout is
It's a decent futuristic racing game and some of the tracks are awesome but it doesn't come close to wipeout which is super smooth and super fast with no slow down at certain points on the track (what's that all about) I have had the game from the start and they still haven't addressed what I would call a major flaw in the handling of the craft and the flow of the tracks.
the guys who made wipe out made this game so ur wrong
@@dereksmall4311 they may have been involved but wipeout is still better the lack of features and tracks alone makes it inferior wipeout has been going for so long it is totally refined and they have a lot of tracks to fall back on and it's a polished experience. but pacer as is it's a bare-bone experience at best. but it is still one of the best future racing games on the PC it's just lacking in polish and content.
@@h3onyx587 i agree but my complaint is the game sudenly slows down at certain points on the track for no reason.so its a matter of choice and i chose not to play a raceing game that does that,any raceing game.
i still have it in my steam libary i just dont play it much if ever.
Good Futuristic Racing Game!
This looks extremely impressive for a game I have never heard of.. Why is no one talking about this?
The new dev that acquired the game and it's IP rights publicly admitted it's dead forever, plus the one of the old producers are still suing and causing a fuss which just makes funding for any improvement or sequel practically impossible. Dead game, literally.
@@bluein_ Literally the perfect concept for a racing game, but we don't get it easily.
The concept of this type of game was originally presented in 1998 by the "Church of Electronic Entertainment" studio. The game was called "Mars Maniac Demo" and later as the full game "Space Haste 2" by "Dreams Interactive". I was a huge fan of Mars Maniac and spent long hours playing single car / single track. The main difficulty was getting each lap faster than before. My one-time record is 51 laps and an average of 20-30 laps without warm-up. I still have the game files saved somewhere on old PC.
No it wasn't 😂 It's literally a spiritual successor to Wipeout.
the original wipeout, which this game is based on, preceded Space Haste 2 by more than half a decade. wipeout released on the PS1 in 1995, space haste 2 came out in 2001. developers who worked on the wipeout franchise worked on this pacer game. this game has NOTHING to do with space haste. its not inspired by it & not related to in in the slightest. if anything, wipeout inspired space haste. space haste looks more like extreme g than wipeout. another game that precedes space haste 2 by at least 4 years.
Sorry to tell you this, but WipEout invented this formula i think a couple of years before Mars Maniac
I kinda wish Wipeout (and subsequently, Pacer) never implemented mag tracks. Clinging to extremely vertical track segments feels more like Extreme-G and less like Wipeout.
I always preferred the heavy, drifty feeling of Wip3out and Wipeout Pure. It felt like you were piloting a real vehicle skidding along on air, and you had to plan your turns long in advance. It made the more technical tracks a nerve-wracking experience in the best way, and it made simple tracks more laid back and speed-focused.
Wipeout Pulse just kinda ruined it, even worse than Fusion did. The racecraft were too responsive and too maneuverable, making it feel a little more like F-Zero, and the aforementioned mag tracks added a bit of an Extreme-G feel. It was still a fun game, but it just wasn’t Wipeout anymore. And Wipeout HD, HD Fury, and 2048 did nothing to fix it.
i agree
it pretty much is wipe out moron
I agree too. I'm glad I'm not the only one that prefers the more weighty feel of Wipeout Pure.
If you love WipEout, especially the PS1 versions, this is not the game for you.
You will want to get BallisticNG instead.
Yup.
Does it bother anyone else that the thrusters for going left and right fire in the wrong direction?
What do you mean? Everytime I see him turning right the thrusters are coming from the left??
@@hyperx72 And they shouldn't. The little side thrusters on the rear are meant to push the craft's rear inward so that the craft can have a better angle and steer faster in corners. Right now, the way they boost makes no sense.
@@Soliye. You're wrong. On a left turn the left thruster needs to fire to push the back end out to the right so the nose angles to the left allowing for a tighter turn. If you think it's wrong you don't understand how physics work 😂
@@liamriley9816 I think we’re both saying the same thing, but my initial comment didn’t explain the problem properly.
At high speed cornering, the rear-side thrusters work correctly. But when doing micro movements at high speed or cornering at much lower speed I feel like there should be side-front thrusters pushing the front. Right now the right thrusters are on when slowly turning left. That would make the craft go side way, or turn in the opposite direction. The flaps wouldn’t help either in these slow corners.
So in the end, the thrusters are working when in a long corner, but don’t make sense at low and micro mouvements. Could be fixed with front thrusters. Again I might be wrong, but my years of Kerbal makes me feel like something’s off.
Rechecked and yeah, when he does micro adjusting the craft’s rear leans *toward* the side the thruster is on. It fixes it self when he reaches a certain “drift” angle.
@@Soliye. Ok, I get what you tell saying now. My bad dude.
cool game.
The sense of speed looks horrible. like how are you doing 300 mph and it feels like 55?
this is the easiest speed setting
agreed
Nice Wipeout racing game. As I've play some Wipeout on PC
Do you recommend this game?
👍 Sure, it's really nice.
Wipeout vibezzz
👍
We will take those kind words gladly!
@@R8GamesLtd Looks great. Huge Wipeout fan here. Any chance of a Series X enhancement down the road? Would be nice to not have to choose between performance/graphcs mode (though i would pick performance every time.)
Wipeout is still better
F zero***
The Recommend thing in your PC is the Srceenrecorder, Right?
What if there is no screenrecorder in your PC?
2
1
Não
When does the game end
..
no chief - this aint it Q_Q it lacks something that WipeOut has Q_Q
Rather they just remake Arctic Thunder for Xbox and online only 🔥
Wip3out, anyone? :D
bruh pls play on elite class setting
I don't get it, your supposed to incur penalties for hitting the walls of the track.
👍 Pc
👍
Does this game have cross play?
Hello!
Hello!
@@Throneful Also hello!
@@R8GamesLtd Hello!
imma be honest i bought it its way worse than wipeout and costs more not worth it
😏👍🔥🔥🔥🔥
👍
mediocre game and music. F-zero GX is a distant memory
OKAY..... so nobody asked me to air my opinions but IDC ..... I'll be brutally honest anyway:
THE FEEL - Feels like the devs were experimenting with a new direction for the anti-grav racing genre -- fail.
NEW IDEAS - It introduce some new mechanics such as testing prototype upgrades at certain points throughout the campaign..... [starts snoring...]
SENSE OF SPEED - Feels like i'm driving Ms. Daisy.... enough said.
SFX - the purpose of sfx is to engage the player's awareness of what's happening..... I was bored and under-stimulated
MUSIC - This is a big part of giving racing games a sense of speed.... I can tell by this game your budget was tight, and the investors were penny pinchers forcing you to find a bunch of nobodies to produce uninspiring tracks for this game.
REPLAY VALUE - I only replay games I actually enjoy... this one not so much.
Fast rmx is seems to be better than this
no Online Matches really sucks...wasted 20 bucks
Seems today game makers dont have any imagination, its now just copying , remastering or upping graphics,sad !
p sure it's some of the original wipeout devs
It's dead
The Recommend thing in your PC is the Srceenrecorder, Right?
What if there is no screenrecorder in your PC?