I have been to Parkin and Spiro in Arkansas and Oklahoma. I have yet to make it down to Toltec. Northern Louisiana has some very old locations. Poverty Point etc. love the content
Toltec is nickname for tribe in ancient Mexico before the Mexica ("Aztec" ) tribe. Ancient American tribes throughout ALL of the American continent were highly advanced, and incredibly clever. Ancient tribes from either sides of the whole land could definitely, quite easily, have traveled or visited other very far parts of the continent and back.
Puncho Villa yep plenty of proof there actually, even in the language. Uto aztecan is found in USA. Ute, Paiute, Shoshone, Comanche etc. are all uto aztecan groups. And Cahokia mounds shows evidence of sacrifice no different from the Aztecs which was shooting at a female’s limbs with bow and arrows before ripping her heart out. They found many skeletal remains with arrow damages on the limbs. Btw it’s just facts, all human cultures have something like this, even the Vikings did human sacrifice. I was even shocked that the Tibetan people did human sacrifice.
I live close to these mounds and I have a question about the land and some key areas around me. I have pictures that will blow your mind amd access to some crazy stuff I believe happened to this bayou culture. Any help is appreciated and wont go for free, just message me on youtube ty good day.
Someone needs to look into/talk about the Native American earthworks of New York State.Apparently the western and central parts of the state used to be covered.Also some parts north and in the Hudson River Valley had some earthworks.A small number of mounds still remain.
What's amazing about some of the ones, I believe in the Ohio River-Great Lakes area, date back to 20,000 years ago. These people could not have come from Asia. Some don't want to admit it; but, Geologist, Climatologists, and Meteorologist Scientist have said, due to the 3 mile high glaciation Ice sheets of the Pleistocene epoch, blocking the way, no one could have walked down from Alaska before 10,000 BCE! South American scientist say humans have been there since 100,000 years ago and that they came by boat from Africa; and not, walked from Asia! I agree with the South American scientist!
@@siriusfun wow, yes. Everyone discovered America before Columbus but who were the red haired green eye'd and blond haired blue eye'd tall ones who were here & opps some ate the incoming interlopers, bad crops that year? Who knows?
Before the US and Mexico existed, those boundaries were mute. The similar cultures are as the stone " goddess figurines are found all over Europe, and ring stones, bog bodies.. are from times when there were different boundaries. The kiva's at Chaco Canyon, are no different than those found in the middle of Mexico city.
Lol I'm from arkansas. I know exactly where that is. The tribe that built them are still there in parkin. Those are my people, and they call us black to this day smh.
Interestingly native means born there , the same root word as nativity IE nativity play , aboriginal might be a better word linguistically but I get your point 😊@@christophercarlos209
Being a Native American raised in Arkansas. One of only a few. I find it very interesting to see Europeans explaining what they know nothing of. Stick to explaining your own culture. funnt how they ignore their own rules. The first one they post is do not disturb the plants yet they mow the mounds every day. Arrrrggh the hypocrisy.
Many of the mounds in North America are thought to predate Native American people. I'll take the Shawnee legends at face value: they claim the structures were already there when they arrived. The irony here is delicious.;)
About 4 hours north from there is Cahokia Mounds. In Southern IL near St Louis. Very similar different build material. Worth a trip if you havent been or arent already planning to go.
It would be desired to attend a (visit - class) should you return to tour these again. Worth a fee to understand the knowledge referenced in this video. I am next state over in Tennessee - always adm8red the natural geographylical beauty of Arkansas - a most underrated area.
Yes, you really should visit Cahokia if you want a view of the largest and best-preserved collection of mounds in America. Cahokia is considered the largest city north of Mexico for at least 1000 yrs. And strangely it's much like today. It's said that all the major Indian Trading Routes converged at Cahokia, just like the Interstate Highway System (which was largely built atop older 2-lane roads which were themselves built atop Those Very Indian Trails). So yes, Cahokia is KEY. I've spent many years engaged in studying Native American History, esp. attempting to focus on PRE-CONTACT history. And as far as I can discern there is NO solid empirical archaeological data to support the naming of the Mound-Builders as Mississippian, Adena or Hopewell or anything else. The diary of DeSoto, which chronicles his travels through the swamps and dense forests of what is now the Deep South are the closest thing we have to unbiased accounts of Pre-Contact Native American tribes there.
Anywhere along the Mississippi, Red, Arkansas, Ohio, and Missouri would have been a prime trading site. The Toltec mounds site is right on the Arkansas, go figure. To my mind, this is a prime example of "science ignored, or what to do when the data does not show what you want it to show". The idea that there was a thriving American civilization long before the Europeans could find it is upsetting to many. The idea that the Vikings found it 400 years before the Spaniards is just not palatable at all. The greater mystery is what happened to this magnificent civilization between 1000-1500 AD. It was gone and when Europeans finally got here, petty tribes ruled the land once under this mighty civilization. My guess?, mankind's relentless urge to destroy.
I had a conversation in 1983 with the head dude at the Cahokia Mounds Museum and he answered a question that none of his coworkers would...the size of the 2 year old child in the papoose display. I had gone there in middle school and elementary school and neither the employees at the old building would answer nor my teachers...but the head director beat me to it as I was pondering the 2 year old child of over 4' in height. He said pretty big child huh? I asked the obvious and he said the older city has complete skeletons of 8 - 10' and some nearly 12' and that the actual in flesh persons as young adults may have been taller. Then the city was estimated to have been at about 250K in about 50 BC...but the change to 20K in 1150 AD is new - or in reality - decline and misdirection so nobody asked about the how and the what? Also, then the experts said at it's height the central metro area had running water and a sewage system...was that made up or something else?
I suggest James Alexander Thom's historical fiction novel, " The Children of First Man". The Mandon people spoke Welsh words. The Phoenicians were secretive traders who ruled the seas thousands of years before the Greeks, and they have left evidence all over the new world. The vikings had boats nearly identicle to the Phoenicians, and the vikings ruled the Isle of Man, considered part of Wales by some..
I just want to finish my thought. The Diaries and Logbooks of Hernando De Soto and Cabeza De Vaca are both quite rich in first-hand accounts of First Contacts with Many of the tribes who probably built the Mounds (or their ancestors did). I think it's De Soto who was able to write down the Original Names of many of the tribes and also their villages. Linguistic work could prob bear a Lot of fruit in terms of ascribing some sort of provenance to these people (bad sentence I know). Anyway, there remains Much to be done in this field. We weren't even taught of the Existence of the Mounds when I was in school let alone taught about theories re: who they were and where they came from for Christ's Sake!! I could go on. But I'll stop. My favorite mound sites: Cahokia, The Serpent Mound, Adena/Hopewell, Ohio; Fort Ancient on the Little Miami R. Oregonia, OH; Poverty Point in Pioneer, LA; and the numerous sites in Newark, OH. There remains to be done much Geodetic and Geomantic work
Yeah don't know your past than you don't know your feature no border line for indigenous aboriginal people of turtle island true facts history, there was no shach thing as honestly people of turtle island!
@@pontiacaztec917 Turtle Island! Yes, not too far from my home is a quarry filled with petrified aquatic life forms. The Hindu scriptures spoke if "Turtle Island" and Patala/Amaruca being the home of the unrully Nagas/serpent folk. Let us talk.
Please check Laplata MD St IGNATIUS church..definitely has tunneling and I think mounds..I do know the US GOVT bombed this area around 1943. Couple miles from white house and pentagon
aye i live in ozark arkansas and literally up my road on highway 64, i see mounds in the dirt and it’s said to be where native americans set up camps and teepees but now it’s just someone’s feild
I'm a mounds enthusiast, growing up near one here in northeast Alabama and visiting several throughout Alabama and Georgia. But also having learned more about the mounds of my Swabian and Celtiberian ancestors back in Europa, speaking to something deeply linked to all of us - Astrotheology. Looking at and being nurtured by the same sky and celestial bodies, to the various stars, aligning our mounds accordingly. I would advise seeking out the folklore and oral traditions of the tribes that were indigenous to these areas, as they will tell us far more and far more accurately at that, than the academics who have their own dogmas.
If the land was at one time one big mass that was split apart, how do we know these structures are pointing to or aligning with a certain star system or celestial body?
I spent time growing up in rural S.Illinois and I begged my Mom to take us to Cahokia Mounds. I still remember the strange birdman looking winged creature petroglyph high up on a rock face. This was in the late 1970's. My brother often went with friends out arrowhead hunting and one time he actually brought one back. My Mom now says that area is high in UFO sightings and this is Red Bud, Illinois where I grew up. A book I have called Ancient America shows this area and the surrounds was very populated with Native Cultures. I am not sure if they are the Mound Builders because some Native people say it was not them who built the Mounds...
I'm from Little Rock and I remember in the '80s when the news would be reporting UFO sighting, used have everyone scared, because you would be watching as the reports came in and the news would be warning people, not to go outside and stuff, thinking about it still brings a chils.
No it is Toltec. Why do you feel you can call them woodland? This is why we have soo much misinformation. Besides its not your heritage. We are the Indigenous. Of ALL land masses. Yall need to get it together period.
Poverty point would be a good view for you. Theres a story of a mound in the delta that they pulled a giant out of. The mistake was the bones of the giant was sent to Smithsonian Museum and they "lost them"!
Ever tried talking about it with one of the descendants of the mound builders? My family came from Cahokia long long ago. your overlooking the simple truth, the Walum Olam is correct (Though Mistranslated), and the natives came from the south, not from across the bearing straight, at one time we were 2 nations, the Puan and the Puant. as the Anishinaabe (The eldest of the Algonquins) migrated we scattered people, in case we had to fall back, though our prophets kept urging us forward. the prophecy of seven fires was written during that great migration, when you come to understand how they correlate in truth it is a way different and much more complete picture. Lots of misunderstood history, and the families of the people your discussing are actually still here, though in dwindling numbers, dwindling faster and faster year by year. I am a Miami myself, that is one step down from Lenape in age, we call the Lenape Grandfather, Like our Shawnee and Ojibway brothers. At one time they called us "Adena" or "Hopewell", and before that we were called "Fort Ancient" peoples. The "Modern" mound builders are called "Cherokee", not that they are actually them, but they descended from us, and that is true, but they are not really us, they were cast out long long ago, we fought for many years, until we had a fullfledged civil war here in the SE "United States" (Turtle Island) that ended around 1625. Native Americans never waged war upon their enemies homes, cause women and children would get in the way, so this was not our practice, instead we would gather at agreed locations, usually in a "bowl" or valley between 2 hills, drums of each nation on top of the hills, warriors below, like the parks in Louisville KY, oddly enough called "Algonquin Park", "Iriquois Park" and alas, "Cherokee Park", all three are hills. there is a great thing to see near there, on the bank of the Ohio River, across the river, in Indiana, there is a slab of stone with turtles and eels all over it, from the last extinction of life, a reminder of the future from the past. So many turtles and eels you always end up on 2 turtles and an eel with each step, yes you can walk on it. Is less than a mile from 64 bridge.
@@michaelalspach8741 can you confirm or give your best opinion based on the History you've been taught, if these are burial mounds and were any other ceremonies done there? Recomend any videos on your family/tribe/group?
I know you’re interested in it, I found a mound of North Carolina and no one seem to give a dang! Doing the whole thing right now, looks like an HBO specials going to come out… Everyone’s like oh how could you do this how could you do this… But the truth of the matter is really no one cares that much. It’s like they care enough to watch from their living rooms but they won’t come out to fight for the history… It’s really unfortunate, I’m quite disenchanted at this point
They believe Mayan coastal traders introduced mound building to the North American natives. The Mayans used very large dugout canoes to conduct trade along the coasts of Central America and the Gulf of Mexico so eventually ventured up the Mississippi River and it's tributaries. They made their dugout canoes using fire and large seashells. They burnt logs then scraped off the charred wood to shape the exterior and hollow out the interior. They passed on that knowledge to the North American tribes where some used shells while others used sharpened stone. Later on they used adzes obtained from European traders. The natives made theirs from fallen cypress trees since the wood was soft and rot resistant. They've found some along the Red River in Louisiana when exposed by bank erosion. Some were formed using fire while others showed iron tool marks.
The Aztecs migrated from the north down to Mexico. We are the same indigenous peoples. USA now was once Aztlan, the motherland of the entire Aztec and Mayan people.
There are mounds all over the state. It’s staggering actually. Most of which have been leveled with a plow 100 years ago exist as hill rises in the middle of fields.
The Book of Mormon speaks to the ingenuity of the Nephite [Mound builder] civilizations and their connection to those who are the descendants of the Lamanite/Nephite remnants.
I didn't slur you or your particular nation, I asked a question (albeit not 100% perfectly either), and I prefer lemons to limes. I am coming at this with regard to the Legend of Prince Mardoc, brother to Arther II of Glamorgan & Gwent of the 562 CE/AD, with which my question was related - just because it doesn't fit with the 'Ancient Mounds' idea, the timeline is related, as could be any/some inscription, carvings and constructions noticed by persons visiting the areas shown rather than the 18th, 19th & 20th Century fancifications.
The book looks good but Collins should stick to Egypt and Gobekli Tepe, his knowledge about the mounds and earthworks is lacking. The Native Indians themselves have stated over and over again in their legends and oral histories that these were already here when they arrived. If they were creations of THEIR ancestors they would have known it. End of story. Collins dismisses wholesale all of these which oddly he otherwise cites. Besides that irrefutable proof they did not possess the knowledge and skill to create astronomically and geometrically aligned superstructures. This wasn't racism or rhetoric but truth. The indians will tell you this as well. And most of the tribes were nomadic and would never even consider creating anything like them in the first place. On top of all of that, the giant skeletons found in and around these mounds are dated to around 11k+ years ago on average in the old newspaper articles.
GodsGrace the interesting part is when you start to look at the maps and ocean currents and the trade routes. travelers that knew navigation by the stars.
It depends very much on the nation (tribe). Some nations have oral histories reflecting mound-building; others do not. There were multiple, unrelated (and competing) mound cultures; they reflect different tribes and traditions. In Wisconsin, for example, the Aztalan-Cahokia mound culture was in direct conflict with the effigy mound culture (Hocąk people). Like any other place on earth, the Americas were home to many hundreds of different cultures and languages and civilizations which came and went. There was coast-to-coast trade, and expert craftsmanship (including masonry and earthworking). These cultures absolutely possessed the knowledge and skill to create astronomically and geometrically aligned superstructures--and archeology proves they did just that. From Mexico to Canada, earthworks and masonry and pathmaking are painstakingly and perfectly aligned with stars and cardinal points, just as they are in cultures on other continents. Hundreds of tribes were not nomadic in any sense of the word, and built long-lasting (visible to this day), permanent communities. Some tribes did indeed follow the buffalo migrations, just as European fishermen followed the fish and whales; however, that doesn't mean they were nomadic. They returned home regularly. Cultures don't just up and move for no reason; war, famine, or simply following changing water patterns did indeed sometimes necessitate relocation, just as it did in Europe and elsewhere. Human beings simply aren't that different from continent to continent or epoch to epoch.
wonder why you fellas don't seek out what locals know and can validate about douscing, spiritual. i mean no harm but I had to chuckle. welcome to our shared ground.
Should have added the Kadoha mounds of Murfreesboro, Arkansas complete with a elongated skulls on display, and how about the mounds of eastern Oklahoma known by the natives to have been built by the giants.
Right, gotta love these propaganda "museums" that are tailored specifically towards obscuring the truth and purposely creating confusion. Take a gander at the paragraph hanging right over the map: "Other rocks used here were found 20 to 50 miles away" Lol that's because the giants themselves used the water systems...in fact most of all those mounds are of Caananite origin through the Amorite/Phoenicians that conquered the seas. Besides they're not gonna display the original giant-esque artifacts found at these sites used by the giants, those were already confiscated by the same propaganda arms that re-edit the truth. The Caananite lineages and all Hamitic lineages just the same had races of real giants within them because they were hybrid beings while the smaller sized inhabitants aka "indians" who were the real "Amor-icans were also descendants of the same Hamitic lineages of giants.... thus the worship to these "gods" which goes all the way back to ancient Sumer and therefore right back to the garden. That would make most of *all* indians related by blood through 1 of 4 descending lines of Ham&Naamah. It's no surprise the descendants are very fond of the "U.f.o's" that love to hang around all of Latin America including the Isles.....basically the same areas where the giants dwelled all over the earth.
Funny... arkansas is really kinda of pushed aside by the majority of the establishment (schools, entertainment, news etc.). In the eyes of most people I have met from different surrounding states (MO, TX, LA) they don't seem to know anything about arkansas, and when you tell people it's as if they are indoctrinated to say "oh, I'm sorry" haha. Wonder if this is for a reason. AR is a beautiful state, has all the natural resources you could ask for and more (crystals, diamonds, natural gas), but yet look at it's population... so small. Just find it odd.
I’m a native for Arkansas...born and raised in Little Rock... my family is of Cherokee tribe...I’ve since relocated to Georgia and it baffles me how many people never heard of Arkansas and were shock to see me a person of “black” skin from Arkansas. Education people!!
kingdom come Arkansas had the better schools in the US during the Clinton Administration. Actually, Hillary worked on establishing a more 1st class academic standard for education during those years. Nevada was 1st and Arkansas 2nd.
Aztec ruins and Chaco Canyon in NM Aztalan(Aztlan) state park in WI, Toltec Mound in AR. I feel like they don't want to acknowledge the mesoamerican influence because the people in this country deemed illegal who are actually indigenous af. 😂
While I was staying very close to these mounds at a friend's house I came upon a rock that qas completely black with depictions made that blew my mind of what looked like a shaman and on the other side a huge bird. I took a picture of it and my phone emitted a green lazer like scanner before taking the picture. This place was on a leyline, and within a crystalline vortex, and on the land there was something very ritualistic that took place, also it was an old plantation. I seen in a picture of an orb I caught that projected a hologram of what looked like a slaver being enslaved to this orb by what looked like a dark shaman, very dark.
TARTARIA AMERICA history is all lies deceits PART 1 ua-cam.com/video/4qvtZ3hTOvc/v-deo.html PART 2 ua-cam.com/video/F-WT6y5AHEA/v-deo.html TARTARIA ua-cam.com/video/25uE_lYriKg/v-deo.html TARTARIA MAPS ua-cam.com/video/CTWXtzMvKsU/v-deo.html ua-cam.com/video/N5OP4SKbqnM/v-deo.html THE RESET OF AMERICA TARTARIA AMERICA ua-cam.com/video/ut-tynQhw7s/v-deo.html
Indigenous Americans. Not native, or any other group. The Aztecs, Mayans, and Toltec people were of color and slowly for surely, the curtain will open and show its true self. What’s funny is, you have groups that represent their region such as Europe population consists of other European nations, Asia consists of other Asian nations, Africa consists of other African nations, the Americas was the same way. It was populated with American nations such as Aztecs, Mayans, etc. Europeans and every other European nation made it a must to find the Americas for new life for them and they were aware that it was already populated based on the writings of diff explorers who predated Columbus. The Americas was populated with different groups of brown people. We are the true indigenous people. No one in my family originated from Africa and have been in the Americas since the beginning. This place was populated with brown people. Not mongloid looking Asians that come from an entirely different area.. it’s facts and proven that the Mississippians(diff indigenous groups in America) populated the Americas. No group just disappear. One thing I know about this place, the gov will try their best to hide the evil they did. No Asians, Europeans, or Africans are native to this land. Period. Hispanics are mongoloids and are not native to America. The so called native indian in America is of mongoloid decent and are not native to this land. The Americas were not unpopulated land.. there were many indigenous people here who were shipped to Europe and other places, while they populated the lands with other outsiders which is why they call America the land of immigrants now when that was not the case..
The Aztecs and Mayan peoples migrated from Aztlan (north America) to the south. I just thought you the pre-european name of the land before whites illegally immigrated to it. Your welcome. ✋🙄
@@joshua.snyder awww…. Little guy spends his time going to UA-cam channels to discuss topics he doesn’t even believe in. Do you need some attention? Hahahahahaha
I have been to Parkin and Spiro in Arkansas and Oklahoma. I have yet to make it down to Toltec. Northern Louisiana has some very old locations. Poverty Point etc. love the content
Also there is Woodhenge near Cahokia Mounds. It is said to be aligned to the summer solstice.
We have Native American Mounds in Minnesota right here in Saint Paul
Toltec is nickname for tribe in ancient Mexico before the Mexica ("Aztec" ) tribe. Ancient American tribes throughout ALL of the American continent were highly advanced, and incredibly clever. Ancient tribes from either sides of the whole land could definitely, quite easily, have traveled or visited other very far parts of the continent and back.
Puncho Villa yep plenty of proof there actually, even in the language. Uto aztecan is found in USA. Ute, Paiute, Shoshone, Comanche etc. are all uto aztecan groups. And Cahokia mounds shows evidence of sacrifice no different from the Aztecs which was shooting at a female’s limbs with bow and arrows before ripping her heart out. They found many skeletal remains with arrow damages on the limbs. Btw it’s just facts, all human cultures have something like this, even the Vikings did human sacrifice. I was even shocked that the Tibetan people did human sacrifice.
Good nickname... 😆😆😆😆😳😳😳😳
I live close to these mounds and I have a question about the land and some key areas around me. I have pictures that will blow your mind amd access to some crazy stuff I believe happened to this bayou culture. Any help is appreciated and wont go for free, just message me on youtube ty good day.
Advanced Stone Age civilizations.
Melanin
Someone needs to look into/talk about the Native American earthworks of New York State.Apparently the western and central parts of the state used to be covered.Also some parts north and in the Hudson River Valley had some earthworks.A small number of mounds still remain.
What's amazing about some of the ones, I believe in the Ohio River-Great Lakes area, date back to 20,000 years ago. These people could not have come from Asia. Some don't want to admit it; but, Geologist, Climatologists, and Meteorologist Scientist have said, due to the 3 mile high glaciation Ice sheets of the Pleistocene epoch, blocking the way, no one could have walked down from Alaska before 10,000 BCE!
South American scientist say humans have been there since 100,000 years ago and that they came by boat from Africa; and not, walked from Asia!
I agree with the South American scientist!
@@KenDSigma Not Africa - the polynesian islands. No Denisovan DNA in Africa.
@@siriusfun wow, yes. Everyone discovered America before Columbus but who were the red haired green eye'd and blond haired blue eye'd tall ones who were here & opps some ate the incoming interlopers, bad crops that year? Who knows?
Before the US and Mexico existed, those boundaries were mute. The similar cultures are as the stone " goddess figurines are found all over Europe, and ring stones, bog bodies.. are from times when there were different boundaries. The kiva's at Chaco Canyon, are no different than those found in the middle of Mexico city.
Lol I'm from arkansas. I know exactly where that is. The tribe that built them are still there in parkin. Those are my people, and they call us black to this day smh.
Jay Dixon
Lol 😂 you’re not Native to this continent bro
Interestingly native means born there , the same root word as nativity IE nativity play , aboriginal might be a better word linguistically but I get your point 😊@@christophercarlos209
@@chugg8708😂😂😂😂😂
@@chugg8708 well you are black. Just because you're black doesn't mean they were black you tard.
Being a Native American raised in Arkansas. One of only a few. I find it very interesting to see Europeans explaining what they know nothing of. Stick to explaining your own culture. funnt how they ignore their own rules. The first one they post is do not disturb the plants yet they mow the mounds every day. Arrrrggh the hypocrisy.
Many of the mounds in North America are thought to predate Native American people.
I'll take the Shawnee legends at face value: they claim the structures were already there when they arrived.
The irony here is delicious.;)
#FACTS
Metallurgy leaves no resistant force alive. Too bad
Feathers up
Email???
About 4 hours north from there is Cahokia Mounds. In Southern IL near St Louis. Very similar different build material. Worth a trip if you havent been or arent already planning to go.
Another possible use for the plummets is weights for fishing nets.
It would be desired to attend a (visit - class) should you return to tour these again.
Worth a fee to understand the knowledge referenced in this video.
I am next state over in Tennessee - always adm8red the natural geographylical beauty of Arkansas - a most underrated area.
Yes, you really should visit Cahokia if you want a view of the largest and best-preserved collection of mounds in America. Cahokia is considered the largest city north of Mexico for at least 1000 yrs. And strangely it's much like today. It's said that all the major Indian Trading Routes converged at Cahokia, just like the Interstate Highway System (which was largely built atop older 2-lane roads which were themselves built atop Those Very Indian Trails). So yes, Cahokia is KEY. I've spent many years engaged in studying Native American History, esp. attempting to focus on PRE-CONTACT history. And as far as I can discern there is NO solid empirical archaeological data to support the naming of the Mound-Builders as Mississippian, Adena or Hopewell or anything else. The diary of DeSoto, which chronicles his travels through the swamps and dense forests of what is now the Deep South are the closest thing we have to unbiased accounts of Pre-Contact Native American tribes there.
Anywhere along the Mississippi, Red, Arkansas, Ohio, and Missouri would have been a prime trading site. The Toltec mounds site is right on the Arkansas, go figure. To my mind, this is a prime example of "science ignored, or what to do when the data does not show what you want it to show". The idea that there was a thriving American civilization long before the Europeans could find it is upsetting to many. The idea that the Vikings found it 400 years before the Spaniards is just not palatable at all.
The greater mystery is what happened to this magnificent civilization between 1000-1500 AD. It was gone and when Europeans finally got here, petty tribes ruled the land once under this mighty civilization. My guess?, mankind's relentless urge to destroy.
I had a conversation in 1983 with the head dude at the Cahokia Mounds Museum and he answered a question that none of his coworkers would...the size of the 2 year old child in the papoose display. I had gone there in middle school and elementary school and neither the employees at the old building would answer nor my teachers...but the head director beat me to it as I was pondering the 2 year old child of over 4' in height. He said pretty big child huh? I asked the obvious and he said the older city has complete skeletons of 8 - 10' and some nearly 12' and that the actual in flesh persons as young adults may have been taller. Then the city was estimated to have been at about 250K in about 50 BC...but the change to 20K in 1150 AD is new - or in reality - decline and misdirection so nobody asked about the how and the what? Also, then the experts said at it's height the central metro area had running water and a sewage system...was that made up or something else?
Martin Duke this might interest you ua-cam.com/video/DhEzAMlx1EE/v-deo.html also Patagonian Indians were said to be ten feet tall 🤷♀️ who knows
An, the ever exotic Arkansas!
There's some odd stuff here
I suggest James Alexander Thom's historical fiction novel, " The Children of First Man". The Mandon people spoke Welsh words. The Phoenicians were secretive traders who ruled the seas thousands of years before the Greeks, and they have left evidence all over the new world. The vikings had boats nearly identicle to the Phoenicians, and the vikings ruled the Isle of Man, considered part of Wales by some..
Was the Isle of Man viking occupied durring the "Ulster" times? Tell me of Sgathach and her military school if you please.
I just want to finish my thought. The Diaries and Logbooks of Hernando De Soto and Cabeza De Vaca are both quite rich in first-hand accounts of First Contacts with Many of the tribes who probably built the Mounds (or their ancestors did). I think it's De Soto who was able to write down the Original Names of many of the tribes and also their villages. Linguistic work could prob bear a Lot of fruit in terms of ascribing some sort of provenance to these people (bad sentence I know). Anyway, there remains Much to be done in this field. We weren't even taught of the Existence of the Mounds when I was in school let alone taught about theories re: who they were and where they came from for Christ's Sake!! I could go on. But I'll stop. My favorite mound sites: Cahokia, The Serpent Mound, Adena/Hopewell, Ohio; Fort Ancient on the Little Miami R. Oregonia, OH; Poverty Point in Pioneer, LA; and the numerous sites in Newark, OH. There remains to be done much Geodetic and Geomantic work
Yeah don't know your past than you don't know your feature no border line for indigenous aboriginal people of turtle island true facts history, there was no shach thing as honestly people of turtle island!
Where they from!? I think I might know.
@@pontiacaztec917 Turtle Island! Yes, not too far from my home is a quarry filled with petrified aquatic life forms. The Hindu scriptures spoke if "Turtle Island" and Patala/Amaruca being the home of the unrully Nagas/serpent folk. Let us talk.
What our u talking about
Please check Laplata MD St IGNATIUS church..definitely has tunneling and I think mounds..I do know the US GOVT bombed this area around 1943. Couple miles from white house and pentagon
There are mounds in arkansas other than south northern ark is full of em. Or was before they flooded it.
aye i live in ozark arkansas and literally up my road on highway 64, i see mounds in the dirt and it’s said to be where native americans set up camps and teepees but now it’s just someone’s feild
@@Jtree999 yep I am from mtn.home
I'm a mounds enthusiast, growing up near one here in northeast Alabama and visiting several throughout Alabama and Georgia. But also having learned more about the mounds of my Swabian and Celtiberian ancestors back in Europa, speaking to something deeply linked to all of us - Astrotheology. Looking at and being nurtured by the same sky and celestial bodies, to the various stars, aligning our mounds accordingly. I would advise seeking out the folklore and oral traditions of the tribes that were indigenous to these areas, as they will tell us far more and far more accurately at that, than the academics who have their own dogmas.
If the land was at one time one big mass that was split apart, how do we know these structures are pointing to or aligning with a certain star system or celestial body?
I spent time growing up in rural S.Illinois and I begged my Mom to take us to Cahokia Mounds. I still remember the strange birdman looking winged creature petroglyph high up on a rock face. This was in the late 1970's. My brother often went with friends out arrowhead hunting and one time he actually brought one back. My Mom now says that area is high in UFO sightings and this is Red Bud, Illinois where I grew up. A book I have called Ancient America shows this area and the surrounds was very populated with Native Cultures. I am not sure if they are the Mound Builders because some Native people say it was not them who built the Mounds...
I'm from Little Rock and I remember in the '80s when the news would be reporting UFO sighting, used have everyone scared, because you would be watching as the reports came in and the news would be warning people, not to go outside and stuff, thinking about it still brings a chils.
Interesting
Grandfather and Great Grandmother are of Choctaw descent in Arkansas (Landowners)!
Nice work~
You should have showed close ups of the artifacts and less of the mumbling Andrew .
I hope you visited Cahokia mounds In Illinois .... much suppressed Archeology at this site over the years ! Peace
+The Real Scott Davis - next time!!
155.8 feet is almost exactly 90 canonical Egyptian cubit (155.8/1.728=90.162). Thought it probably would be a stretch to read much into that.
Stiglitz71
Worthy point.
No it is Toltec. Why do you feel you can call them woodland? This is why we have soo much misinformation. Besides its not your heritage. We are the Indigenous. Of ALL land masses. Yall need to get it together period.
Poverty point would be a good view for you. Theres a story of a mound in the delta that they pulled a giant out of. The mistake was the bones of the giant was sent to Smithsonian Museum and they "lost them"!
"They" tell you there was no giant bones, usually there is.
that is Sah lean river. west of the mounds- 35 miles away
You flew from UK to see this?
+taipeikartman I was speaking at a conference, then I did a road trip to numerous sites.
Ever tried talking about it with one of the descendants of the mound builders?
My family came from Cahokia long long ago.
your overlooking the simple truth, the Walum Olam is correct (Though Mistranslated), and the natives came from the south, not from across the bearing straight, at one time we were 2 nations, the Puan and the Puant.
as the Anishinaabe (The eldest of the Algonquins) migrated we scattered people, in case we had to fall back, though our prophets kept urging us forward.
the prophecy of seven fires was written during that great migration, when you come to understand how they correlate in truth it is a way different and much more complete picture.
Lots of misunderstood history, and the families of the people your discussing are actually still here, though in dwindling numbers, dwindling faster and faster year by year.
I am a Miami myself, that is one step down from Lenape in age, we call the Lenape Grandfather, Like our Shawnee and Ojibway brothers. At one time they called us "Adena" or "Hopewell", and before that we were called "Fort Ancient" peoples.
The "Modern" mound builders are called "Cherokee", not that they are actually them, but they descended from us, and that is true, but they are not really us, they were cast out long long ago, we fought for many years, until we had a fullfledged civil war here in the SE "United States" (Turtle Island) that ended around 1625.
Native Americans never waged war upon their enemies homes, cause women and children would get in the way, so this was not our practice, instead we would gather at agreed locations, usually in a "bowl" or valley between 2 hills, drums of each nation on top of the hills, warriors below, like the parks in Louisville KY, oddly enough called "Algonquin Park", "Iriquois Park" and alas, "Cherokee Park", all three are hills.
there is a great thing to see near there, on the bank of the Ohio River, across the river, in Indiana, there is a slab of stone with turtles and eels all over it, from the last extinction of life, a reminder of the future from the past. So many turtles and eels you always end up on 2 turtles and an eel with each step, yes you can walk on it. Is less than a mile from 64 bridge.
MegalithomaniaUK
What conference?
Will there be another???
@@michaelalspach8741 can you confirm or give your best opinion based on the History you've been taught, if these are burial mounds and were any other ceremonies done there? Recomend any videos on your family/tribe/group?
Learning so much from your channel, thanks so much for all the uploads and your passion for this work. I love it!!
I know you’re interested in it, I found a mound of North Carolina and no one seem to give a dang! Doing the whole thing right now, looks like an HBO specials going to come out… Everyone’s like oh how could you do this how could you do this… But the truth of the matter is really no one cares that much. It’s like they care enough to watch from their living rooms but they won’t come out to fight for the history… It’s really unfortunate, I’m quite disenchanted at this point
They believe Mayan coastal traders introduced mound building to the North American natives. The Mayans used very large dugout canoes to conduct trade along the coasts of Central America and the Gulf of Mexico so eventually ventured up the Mississippi River and it's tributaries. They made their dugout canoes using fire and large seashells. They burnt logs then scraped off the charred wood to shape the exterior and hollow out the interior. They passed on that knowledge to the North American tribes where some used shells while others used sharpened stone. Later on they used adzes obtained from European traders. The natives made theirs from fallen cypress trees since the wood was soft and rot resistant. They've found some along the Red River in Louisiana when exposed by bank erosion. Some were formed using fire while others showed iron tool marks.
The Aztecs migrated from the north down to Mexico. We are the same indigenous peoples. USA now was once Aztlan, the motherland of the entire Aztec and Mayan people.
Lived less than an hour from here. Now im in the ozarks. Mysterious country for sure
There are mounds all over the state. It’s staggering actually. Most of which have been leveled with a plow 100 years ago exist as hill rises in the middle of fields.
I've been there, pretty neat place
This is where my family is from!
The Book of Mormon speaks to the ingenuity of the Nephite [Mound builder] civilizations and their connection to those who are the descendants of the Lamanite/Nephite remnants.
I wonder if there are at some of the sites closer to Kentukiana area, at any of the stone forts, any Khumric inscriptions or Glamorgan Crosses ?
Razor1uk they're all up and down the Mississippi. you've got to know what you're looking for. and not come into it like a limey.
I didn't slur you or your particular nation, I asked a question (albeit not 100% perfectly either), and I prefer lemons to limes. I am coming at this with regard to the Legend of Prince Mardoc, brother to Arther II of Glamorgan & Gwent of the 562 CE/AD, with which my question was related - just because it doesn't fit with the 'Ancient Mounds' idea, the timeline is related, as could be any/some inscription, carvings and constructions noticed by persons visiting the areas shown rather than the 18th, 19th & 20th Century fancifications.
The book looks good but Collins should stick to Egypt and Gobekli Tepe, his knowledge about the mounds and earthworks is lacking. The Native Indians themselves have stated over and over again in their legends and oral histories that these were already here when they arrived. If they were creations of THEIR ancestors they would have known it. End of story. Collins dismisses wholesale all of these which oddly he otherwise cites. Besides that irrefutable proof they did not possess the knowledge and skill to create astronomically and geometrically aligned superstructures. This wasn't racism or rhetoric but truth. The indians will tell you this as well. And most of the tribes were nomadic and would never even consider creating anything like them in the first place. On top of all of that, the giant skeletons found in and around these mounds are dated to around 11k+ years ago on average in the old newspaper articles.
GodsGrace the interesting part is when you start to look at the maps and ocean currents and the trade routes.
travelers that knew navigation by the stars.
It depends very much on the nation (tribe). Some nations have oral histories reflecting mound-building; others do not. There were multiple, unrelated (and competing) mound cultures; they reflect different tribes and traditions. In Wisconsin, for example, the Aztalan-Cahokia mound culture was in direct conflict with the effigy mound culture (Hocąk people). Like any other place on earth, the Americas were home to many hundreds of different cultures and languages and civilizations which came and went. There was coast-to-coast trade, and expert craftsmanship (including masonry and earthworking). These cultures absolutely possessed the knowledge and skill to create astronomically and geometrically aligned superstructures--and archeology proves they did just that. From Mexico to Canada, earthworks and masonry and pathmaking are painstakingly and perfectly aligned with stars and cardinal points, just as they are in cultures on other continents. Hundreds of tribes were not nomadic in any sense of the word, and built long-lasting (visible to this day), permanent communities. Some tribes did indeed follow the buffalo migrations, just as European fishermen followed the fish and whales; however, that doesn't mean they were nomadic. They returned home regularly. Cultures don't just up and move for no reason; war, famine, or simply following changing water patterns did indeed sometimes necessitate relocation, just as it did in Europe and elsewhere. Human beings simply aren't that different from continent to continent or epoch to epoch.
we have found many native rocks like thes was said they hung them in a tree over water to bring fishs back to that place
Jerry Johnson
That may be a Most accurate use - likely one of many - "balancing the chi"
Hi! I'm wondering if there any Smiddy's alive in Arkansas left !?!?!? Thank you ! 💋💋
Not sure what that is, so probably not. LOL.
wonder why you fellas don't seek out what locals know and can validate about douscing, spiritual. i mean no harm but I had to chuckle. welcome to our shared ground.
Carolyn Forrester
Please ellaborate.
Mound C at Toltec has two, possibly three human burials. This is mentioned in the book Emerging Patterns Of Plum Bayou Culture.
Wow!
Yeaaaa... plummets used for detecting natural energies? That's the dumbest thing I've heard in a while.
Should have added the Kadoha mounds of Murfreesboro, Arkansas complete with a elongated skulls on display, and how about the mounds of eastern Oklahoma known by the natives to have been built by the giants.
+Shane Harding We visited those too. Videos coming soon!
+Shane Harding The mounds in Eastern OK are in Spiro (about 10 miles from where I live). There are also Viking Runestones in Heavener OK near Spiro
+Rich Quitliano Yes, we visited both these sites and an Historical Society with many more runestones and original Spiro artifacts!
awesome! I'm gonna look that site up right now
Right, gotta love these propaganda "museums" that are tailored specifically towards obscuring the truth and purposely creating confusion. Take a gander at the paragraph hanging right over the map: "Other rocks used here were found 20 to 50 miles away" Lol that's because the giants themselves used the water systems...in fact most of all those mounds are of Caananite origin through the Amorite/Phoenicians that conquered the seas. Besides they're not gonna display the original giant-esque artifacts found at these sites used by the giants, those were already confiscated by the same propaganda arms that re-edit the truth. The Caananite lineages and all Hamitic lineages just the same had races of real giants within them because they were hybrid beings while the smaller sized inhabitants aka "indians" who were the real "Amor-icans were also descendants of the same Hamitic lineages of giants.... thus the worship to these "gods" which goes all the way back to ancient Sumer and therefore right back to the garden. That would make most of *all* indians related by blood through 1 of 4 descending lines of Ham&Naamah. It's no surprise the descendants are very fond of the "U.f.o's" that love to hang around all of Latin America including the Isles.....basically the same areas where the giants dwelled all over the earth.
I have one of these Indian mounds in my back yard.
do you really? ! Let's go giant hunting.
StinkyTofu
What state?
Can you post it to your channel. Id love to see it!
Pale face he speak with forked tongue, my name is twodogs, twodogsatit.
My people call it corn!
🤣 thats not the kaise ( case)
Funny... arkansas is really kinda of pushed aside by the majority of the establishment (schools, entertainment, news etc.). In the eyes of most people I have met from different surrounding states (MO, TX, LA) they don't seem to know anything about arkansas, and when you tell people it's as if they are indoctrinated to say "oh, I'm sorry" haha. Wonder if this is for a reason. AR is a beautiful state, has all the natural resources you could ask for and more (crystals, diamonds, natural gas), but yet look at it's population... so small. Just find it odd.
I’m a native for Arkansas...born and raised in Little Rock... my family is of Cherokee tribe...I’ve since relocated to Georgia and it baffles me how many people never heard of Arkansas and were shock to see me a person of “black” skin from Arkansas. Education people!!
kingdom come
Arkansas had the better schools in the US during the Clinton Administration. Actually, Hillary worked on establishing a more 1st class academic standard for education during those years.
Nevada was 1st and Arkansas 2nd.
It's funny how all famous people started off with something good. You have to ask did they go dark before or after they were born...
kingdom come =Remember in past there were no border line's original first 500 nation's experience on turtle island.
Brad Barfield wow...thank you so much for taking the time to provide so much good information. I learned from you..thanks
Aztec ruins and Chaco Canyon in NM Aztalan(Aztlan) state park in WI, Toltec Mound in AR. I feel like they don't want to acknowledge the mesoamerican influence because the people in this country deemed illegal who are actually indigenous af. 😂
They just changed the name of the mounds
If If's and buts were candy and nuts, oh what a Christmas it'd be. Quit misinforming people.
While I was staying very close to these mounds at a friend's house I came upon a rock that qas completely black with depictions made that blew my mind of what looked like a shaman and on the other side a huge bird. I took a picture of it and my phone emitted a green lazer like scanner before taking the picture. This place was on a leyline, and within a crystalline vortex, and on the land there was something very ritualistic that took place, also it was an old plantation. I seen in a picture of an orb I caught that projected a hologram of what looked like a slaver being enslaved to this orb by what looked like a dark shaman, very dark.
Wow!
My people call it corn.
My people call it corn.
dude, this is cool
TARTARIA AMERICA history is all lies deceits
PART 1 ua-cam.com/video/4qvtZ3hTOvc/v-deo.html
PART 2 ua-cam.com/video/F-WT6y5AHEA/v-deo.html
TARTARIA ua-cam.com/video/25uE_lYriKg/v-deo.html
TARTARIA MAPS ua-cam.com/video/CTWXtzMvKsU/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/N5OP4SKbqnM/v-deo.html THE RESET OF AMERICA
TARTARIA AMERICA ua-cam.com/video/ut-tynQhw7s/v-deo.html
If you keep digging into these mound building cultures it will lead you to the book of mormon.
Indigenous Americans. Not native, or any other group. The Aztecs, Mayans, and Toltec people were of color and slowly for surely, the curtain will open and show its true self. What’s funny is, you have groups that represent their region such as Europe population consists of other European nations, Asia consists of other Asian nations, Africa consists of other African nations, the Americas was the same way. It was populated with American nations such as Aztecs, Mayans, etc. Europeans and every other European nation made it a must to find the Americas for new life for them and they were aware that it was already populated based on the writings of diff explorers who predated Columbus. The Americas was populated with different groups of brown people. We are the true indigenous people. No one in my family originated from Africa and have been in the Americas since the beginning. This place was populated with brown people. Not mongloid looking Asians that come from an entirely different area.. it’s facts and proven that the Mississippians(diff indigenous groups in America) populated the Americas. No group just disappear. One thing I know about this place, the gov will try their best to hide the evil they did. No Asians, Europeans, or Africans are native to this land. Period. Hispanics are mongoloids and are not native to America. The so called native indian in America is of mongoloid decent and are not native to this land. The Americas were not unpopulated land.. there were many indigenous people here who were shipped to Europe and other places, while they populated the lands with other outsiders which is why they call America the land of immigrants now when that was not the case..
I am sad that main stream archeologists are still scared to talk about these mounds and the finds in them!😊
I live right next to the place (cave) that the "giants" were found. Slay Cave.
I wonder if he realized the irony that England, Arkansas is about 10 miles (or 16 kilometers) away?
Mexicans didn't do this
The Aztecs and Mayan peoples migrated from Aztlan (north America) to the south. I just thought you the pre-european name of the land before whites illegally immigrated to it. Your welcome. ✋🙄
Lies
to find water
If you have a question ask me you don’t knw
Natives exist today in Arkansaat
Book of Mormon took place in this area.
Nonsense. The Book of Mormon is fiction written by Joseph Smith, and it is full of anachronisms and poor misconceptions and reappropriations.
@@joshua.snyder oh, bless your little heart Joshua. Hahahaha
@@jetfocus1152 A Zach Wilson-Jets fans saying "bless your little heart" to anyone is hilarious. Thanks for the laugh this afternoon!
@@joshua.snyder awww…. Little guy spends his time going to UA-cam channels to discuss topics he doesn’t even believe in. Do you need some attention? Hahahahahaha
@@jetfocus1152 Pretty cool that the real Zach Wilson could reach out.
"It becometh every man who has been warned to warn his neighbor."
The Book of Mormon will tell who the mounf builders ware, they called Nephits and Lamanits.
Nonsense. It is 19th century fiction, full of problems and misconceptions about native people.