This was my q! Thank you Rabbi! You answered exactly the question I asked. I had heard somebody else "nitpick" the Greek books and I asked a nitpicky question. Perfect answer!
_The scripture was rewrite alter and recreate by early church fathers in greek empire for the beneficiary of constantine political power and church wealth_
I learn so much about other religions (I am practicing muslim) and Rabbi Tovia Singer is so intelligent and spreads great knowledge for us laymen. Thank you for the work you do. May God Bless you!!!
He should tell us too,that the ORIGINAL Torah does not exist any longer. What they have is what they ,the D- school wrote some 800 years after Moses , and what they thought Moses brought to them...in other words the 5 books of Moses was not written by him....
Tovia...Ok I totally Agree with all this.. So What is the Hebrew stand point or Your View point on the New Testament if it’s so full of lies... do you discard the whole thing? It sure makes me want too !! IAm Not Jewish!! I Highly Respect Your People and Culture Tho and Am a Recovering CHRISTIAN I am a Believer of Truth and Facts tho And Love your Show and your Work!! May HaShem Bless you and Keep you Brother :)
@whatthe The foundation that Christianity stands upon is when your mom catches you in a lie and you keep changing your story to keep the lie going. The mother knows the child is lying, but the child won't give up. The narrative keeps going until it's so contrived that anyone with a minimal amount of intelligence can see through the holes, yet emotionally they won't let go ....
The people that wrote the four gospels were not physically at the trial, the crucifixion or the resurrection yet they write in great detail about what was said and done. The contradictions are an effect of the four persons writing hearsay. If this is the basis of Christianity, it's amazing that it's lasted so long. It's time for Humanity to update from religion to spirituality.
Only reason it lasted as long as it did is because it had the most powerful country on earth enforcing it at sword point for the next couple centuries. Once Rome collapsed we start seeing fragmentation that continues to this day.
By the call of heresy, don't you render all history writings void...because the writers weren't there. Moses wrote of Adam, creation and the flood...shall we discount the Torah because Moses wasn't in attendance. Really? Sometimes in the light of retrospect objectivity illuminates the darkness. I agree wholeheartedly to move from organised religion to a one to one relationship with the creator like Moses had, with the alpha and the omega, the I Am that I Am, the friend of Abraham, the one who sits in judgement between the cherubs in the Holy of Holies.
A more important question.... where was Jesus from age 12 to 30? There's no mention of it anywhere. So God is walking around on earth and nobody knows it? No scribes following him recording his every move? Especially given the hoopla surrounding his birth. After he reaches age 12 the whole middle east suddenly gets amnesia. Then when he finally does show up... no one asks him where the hell he's been for 18 years? Screwy.
John, the bapist, knew who Jesus was. So we don't know what was going on precisely. He was respected from age 12 in the temple, so he was very active and apparently had some idea of who he was.
@@charliesmith3777 Even in the temple people should have remembered who this kid was! Are u kidding. This is god... and people are just walking around surprised by his knowledge. ..and that's it? People should be screaming "look... there's god over there"! How can there be such fanfare regarding the his birth... and then people just cavalierly ignore him until he's 30?! Are u kidding. Especially. Since people were all. Gossiping.... there's no way this kid could go undetected for 18 years!
@@jeffreystern5886our Israelite Ancestors helped them in the middle 700 AD time period and they learned our ways when they converted. The Spanish Speaking Arabs had their hooks in us going back ages. Spanish Speaking Arabs was the real faces of the Israelite Slave Trade with the help of the Caucasians and Hamite Africans. As you study it was all part of prophecy. .
@Jeffery Stern. I can't count the times I've been called a "fake Jew" by people in this chat, and in other media in the over 40 years I've been doing this. It's usually "We have the new Covenant, so we are the new Jews, not you." Good thing these people don't get to say who's Jewish, and who isn't.
People forgetting a very important point. Greeks wrote the NT, YES, Greeks who created theatre , drama, literature, music, science, art, Olympics.... and they did a very good job. We are all till today benefiting from their contributions. However the religion that they have created sucks. It was made by adding the beautiful mythology to the Jewish ideas , the result is a religion that does not make cense , and full of contradictions. On the other hand our super orthodox turned Judaism into a superstition, cult like movement, the black hat People who are so concerned with the procedures they forgot about the people.
One apologist explained it this way: Mary saw the tomb, and left for Peter's while the other women received the angel's message then ran to to tell the other disciples who were at a different place. Meanwhile, Mary and Peter come to the empty tomb, Peter leaves, she has her Jesus encounter, while the other women have theirs. MY QUESTION IS: In John's version he tells her not to touch him, but in Matthew they clasp his feet and worship him. So did they mess his mojo up by touching him?
My dear rabbi, Shalom. Tanakh is the word of God surely , he is the holy one. Blessed be he. ✍️Actually I find two more contradicts, personly I think I m not understanding it so you may help us in that matter of Tanakh. 👉1st-Age difference of king Ahaziah A) 2-kings 8:26 ( Ahaziah is 22 years old at the time of kingship) B) 2-Chronicales 22:2( Ahaziah is 42 years old at the time of kingship) 👉2nd difference in amount and stuff of money A) 2-Samuel 24:24( David gave 50 silver shekel to Araunah) B) 1-chronicle 21:25( David gave six hundred gold shekels) Waiting for you guidance may God Israel bless you with his eternal wisdom that you may be used to bring back lost ones. 🙏
22. Ezra 2:64 and Nehemiah 7:66 agree that the total number of the whole assembly was 42,360. Yet the numbers do not add up to anything close. The totals obtained from each book is as follows: 29,818 (Ezra) 31,089 (Nehemiah)
Mark was added upon on the theme of resurrection, it only means that at the time the writings about the resurrection were not sufficient to prove beyond doubt the event actually took place. It only points out, it never happened.
@ Paula Wallace & @Kypros Christodoulides Me too. It is a complete waste of time. What's more is that it is so damaging to a person's spiritual life. I am speaking from my own personal experience. The NT leads a person into worshiping a man instead of God. I'm so glad to now know it is a pagan fairytale and a waste of time, but it's hard to turn off this conditioning. I grew up "pentecostal xtian". I try to pray and it takes a great effort to keep "in je***' name" out of my prayers because I was taught prayers aren't effective without that name. I'm just SO GLAD to not be a part of that nonsense anymore and to know better than to teach it to my sons.
Hello Sir love your teaching, got a question in the resurrection story what happened to the people who buried Jesus why is there no written story's from them? Did they removed it from the bible.Humm.
My head canon that explains the empty tomb is that officials from the Sanhedrin and their assistants took the body from Joseph of Arimathea's tomb and laid it in the tomb of the Court.
You are not understanding the verse at all. They did conquer Jerusalem, the Jebusites (which were not part of the Jebusite nation but part of the Tower of David which was in Jerusalem, called Jebus) dwelled WITH the Children of Judah in Jerusalem to this very day which enhances the validity of Torah
@@chm5750 "Teaches love, forgiveness, and responsibility for your own deeds-" **looks at the constant genocide, war, and slavery in Russia, and the Eastern Roman Empire** So loving.
When the rabbi tears your religion apart,its OK,but let a Muslim person do that,than the 1st thing you hypocrites do, is to attack the prophet of Islam, hypocrissy at its best...
in Hebrew "Satan" just means the adversary. Satan isnt a person. Its just the personification of evil or the adversary, not an actual being. Why would god listen to satan lmao? I think what the text is saying is that looking at the advisory and seeing their numbers incited david to count his own men. It could be both not either/or
john bosh Incitement to choose good or evil is built into the human being. It’s called free choice. Your question “who incited David to count the fighting men of Israel” is an inherently flawed one.
9. When did David bring the Ark of the Covenant to Jerusalem? Before defeating the Philistines or after? After (2 Samuel 5 and 6) Before (I Chronicles 13 and 14)
Both. The Israelites and the Philistines were constantly at war with each other until they were both crushed by Assyria and Babylon, and the Phillistines either died out or fled to become Carthage, and the Israelites were expelled for decades and the first temple was destroyed. It's hardly unimaginable that bringing the Ark to Jerusalem happened between two wars.
Mr Singer, how would you be if at the end of the times, your mission to fight Christian doctrine, Jesus-Christ, and true christians is found wrong and vain ?
After studying the NT for over twenty years and praying to Jesus as the Mighty God I have come to a controversial conclusion....The NT is also the Word of God and Jesus Christ is still the way, the truth, and the life! Biblical Christianity is not about following a Law or set of rules but it's about a relationship with a Living God who purchased my redemption with His own blood and has given me eternal life! Praise YHWH who has become my Salvation=JESUS!
Donai, the Law has not changed. Yes - we are saved by God's grace, but because God is sovereign over all, we still need to obey his laws. Here's 2 Scripture verses, "Not everyone who says unto me (i.e. Jesus), Lord, Lord (i.e. recognizes the sovereignty of Jesus) shall enter into the kingdom of Heaven, but he that does the will of my Father which is in Heaven (i.e. obeys God's commandments/Torah). Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord (i.e. I recognize you, Jesus, as God) have we not prophesied in your name? and in your name have cast out devils? and in your name done many wonderful works? And then will I (Jesus) profess unto them, "I never knew you: Depart from me you who work iniquity (i.e. Lawlessness)." Matthew 7:21-23 Jesus is the Way - as you say. He kept the Law of God.
@Deals Durban Yes - he criticized them for putting traditions before God's commandments. Matthew 23:2 is another good one. Here, Jesus tells his followers to do everything that the scribes and Pharisees say when they sit in 'Moses's seat' (i.e. when they can only read from the Torah). :)
@@christophermarlowe2356 Hi DSS. I honestly don't think the rules / commandments from the Torah have been done away with. Of course, the priests can't fulfil many of them without the Temple - and I think some - like stoning your children if they curse their parents - really shouldn't be carried out. But - the essence of what's right and wrong remains. What I don't like in the modern church is they often call it 'legalism' if we try to do what God wants. In other words God has to keep doing for us and we return by … what?... singing? That's what most churches seem to think is our job! (Heck - I'd rather listen to his birds.)
@@christophermarlowe2356 Hi DSS. Thanks for always talking to me. I do value your cheery friendship. Re: Two Gods. It’s the same God. It’s just that the corruption of the NT translation makes many think that now it’s “Follow your heart” or “Do as thou wilt”, rather than “God rules”. I think this misunderstanding is sad. BTW - On reflection, I don’t think there’s a rule to stone children for cursing parents. I don’t know how that idea came into my head. I think they have to murder their parents first.
@@christophermarlowe2356 Hi DSS. I’m not sure of the whole Trinity thing. The Shema clearly states that God is one. Now- in the Tenakh there is a Spirit of God that creates (e.g. Genesis 1:2) and we know that the Spirit of God is able to indwell a man e.g. Genesis 41:38, and that God’s Spirit can endow certain gifts in men e.g. Exodus 28:3. We also know that during the times of the Tenakh God occasionally presented himself in the form of a human. E.g. Samson’s Dad, Manoah, said, “We shall surely die because we have seen Elohim”. (Judges 14:32). When God did this (pre-Yeshua) he was often called the Angel of Adonai or the Captain of the Hosts. Now, in the NT, we are told that disciples are to be baptized in the name of the Father, son and Holy Spirit (Matthe 28:19). Does this ‘father’ and ‘son’ refer to a father-God and a son-God or ‘father of Israel’ (i.e. YHWH) and the son of Israel who is the obedient servant? Also - we know that when Yeshua left he said “unless I go away the Comforter (i.e. the Holy Spirit) will not come to you” (John 16:7) - which makes me think they are the same (a bit like Clark Kent and Superman but better :) ); but then, in the Millennium, the Messiah (I claim it’s Yeshua) will reign on David’s throne while YHWH’s Spirit fills Ezekiel’s Temple - so they seem to be different. The popular opinion of the Messianic group that I’m in (whom I love dearly) claim that God needs to be a group to be the origin of companionship love. Otherwise, from where do we get this type of love? My personal opinion is “I’m not sure”. I know God is a Spirit and that he can appear in human form to help us, and I'm sure that Yeshua was an example of this. (Conclusion - I’d hate to ever have to debate the concept of a Trinity.) Re: the 11th Commandment. My Aunt used to tell the joke of Moses coming down from Mt. Sinai, carrying 3 tablets of stone. "I've brought you 15 Commandments from God!" he proudly called to Israel. Moses walked a few more steps, tripped and fell, and in so doing, broke one of the tablets. Upon composing himself he called out, "I've brought you 10 Commandments from God." :)
One point to clarify. "How many days in the tomb?" You say 3D & 2N. But Mt 21:8, Mk 16:2 & Lk 24:1 say only 'on the first day of the [lunar] week. Same for Jn 20:1 but you say 2D & 2N. How did you get the duration out of one single expression? You need the starting and the ending points - into the tomb (Abib 14 evening) until the tomb found empty (Abib 16 dawn) = 1N + 1D + 1N (2 nights + 1 day).
@@joshuarivera2422 BTW, the text in G-Mt is in the setting of the early ministry, not in the Passion week. The expression 'will be for 3D and 3N in the heart of the earth' alludes to his 3 year-period ministry in Jerusalem as the heart of the earth. It has noting to do with how long he is going to remain dead buried in a grave.
Hi Tovia Singer, I am a born again King James bible believing Christian. I have a question for you, why did you guys change the procedure of circumcision and not do it the way the bible says to?
Tovia Singe, despite his intellect, does not comprehend well the passion narrative, but is convinced of himself he does. This is compounded by the troubles evident in the English translations of the gospels that demonstrate a deliberate, agenda driven obscuring of the chronological facts. He should use his prodigious mind in serious apologetic discourse rather that in an attempt at taking potshots at what he does not comprehend spiritually.
@Yerachmiel HaLevi you commit a sin of presumption, in arrogance and should withhold your tongue. I honor the Elohim of Israel, even haQadosh and He sent His servant Yeshua haMashiah according to the Word He gave to His servant Moshe (Deut 18:15-19) rabbeinu ,whom your fathers (and you) have rejected. And the spirit upon him, and the word in his mouth, was that of Avinu Malcheinu, and in your hatred for His spirit, it has led you to call for the crucifixion of haNavi hazot, indicating your hatred for the Father as well; PATRICIDE, EVEN AS IT IS TO THIS DAY..
@Yerachmiel HaLevi You are not even in the same conversation as you argue things irrelevant. Yeshua is the Prophet Moshe wrote, as he was told by haShem, about who was to come, to which Malachi attested. Nothing in Scripture about 'trinity' (your imagination) but there is a Father (whom you deny), a begotten son (whom you are blinded to) and a ru'ach Elohim (whom you, and others like you, continuously provoke). None deny Messiah's humanity, except those who do yimach sh'mo vezichro, as though they can eliminate one who actually exists. Your rejction of That Prophet is held against you, and you will pay the severe price of so doing. As you go through the readings pertaining to the seven sabbaths of consolation, consider why the portion of Isaiah that was SUPPRESSED (Is. 53 and 61) and how prominently they are recorded in the brit chadashah. Deut 18:19 directly relates to Isaiah 53 and many other attesting passages (like Ps, 22) that you have FORSAKEN for your lying traditions that REFUSE to acknowledge the TRUTH of all scripture. The hatred in your heart for the brethren is why the beit miqdash was twice destroyed in history. And your continued sinat chinam will do the same with the NEXT temple.
@Yerachmiel HaLevi the more you write the stupider it gets. Have you never read, Adam haben haElohim? or how the b'nei haElohim rebelled in Bereshit 6? and how about אספרה אל חק יהוה אמר אלי בני אתה אני היום ילדתיך׃
I think cheiatianity has many contradictions but whst religion doesnt ? I think the big divider that needs to be seriously resolved is the divinity of jesus. This part comes later.
Great teaching, These stories are written by people who precive what God and religion to be. Someone wrote no one has ever seen God or heard the voice,some say they did, that is what they wrote , not all people believe those stories those who do will always have issues and not agree with them . If this God what ever that is wanted you to know ,it would already be inside of you, not in a book written by man . Jeremiah 31: 33-35.🤔
Rabbi, I would love to meet and discuss the Scriptures in person. Although we do not yet agree about Messiah, I do respect you and pray for God to make his truth known. You would be interested to know that one of the tribal groups in Liberia may have roots tracing back to the tribe of Dan.
Matthew 12:30-32 He who is not with me is against me and he who does not gather with me scatters. And so I tell you, every sin and blasphemy will be forgiven men, but the blasphemy against the Spirit will not be forgiven. Anyone who speaks a word against the Son of Man will be forgiven. But anyone who speaks against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven, either in this age or in the age to come. John 4:24 God ( Jehovah ) is Spirit..... Zechariah 4:6 so he said to me, this is the word of the Lord to Zerubbabel. Not by might nor by power, but by my Spirit, says the Lord Almighty. Ruach-Ha-qodesh ( The Holy Spirit, Spirit of YHWH ).
You mean against Casper the Holy Ghost? So if I say "I think all the works of the Holy Spirit are actually works of Satan", I'm doomed? well then, "I think all the works of the Holy Spirit are actually works of Satan." Now what?
John 1:32 Then John gave this testimony: I saw the Spirit come down from heaven as a dove and remain on him. John 4:24 God ( Jehovah ) is Spirit... Ruach-Ha-qodesh ( The Holy Spirit, Spirit of YHWH ) So you believe all the works of God ( YHWH ) are from satan? Matthew 12:36-37 But I tell you that men will have to give account on the day of judgment for every careless word they have spoken. For by your words you will be acquitted and by your words you will be condemned.
WORSHIP JEHOVAH - Hello sir! I trust you're living in the peace and love of God! With reference to Matthew 12:30-32, how can Yeshua say such a thing? Who talks like this? Answer: NO ONE! John 7:46 "46 The officers answered, “No one ever spoke like this man!”
ROMANS 11v 7 What then? Israel hath not obtained that which he seeketh for; but the election hath obtained it, and the rest were blinded.8 (According as it is written, God hath given them the spirit of slumber, eyes that they should not see, and ears that they should not hear;) unto this day.
@R G Quoting Romans to Jews? What good will that do? Romans is part of that anti-Semitic sack of garbage called the "Christian Bible". it's nothing but lies, and it's fruits are death and the loss of your soul. Stop polluting this chat with such poisonous nonsense.
1 Corinthians 15:1 Moreover, brethren, I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye have received, and wherein ye stand; 2 By which also ye are saved, if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless ye have believed in vain. 3 For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; 4 And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures: 5 And that he was seen of Cephas, then of the twelve: 6 After that, he was seen of above five hundred brethren at once; of whom the greater part remain unto this present, but some are fallen asleep. 7 After that, he was seen of James; then of all the apostles. 8 And last of all he was seen of me also, as of one born out of due time. 9 For I am the least of the apostles, that am not meet to be called an apostle, because I persecuted the church of God. 10 But by the grace of God I am what I am: and his grace which was bestowed upon me was not in vain; but I laboured more abundantly than they all: yet not I, but the grace of God which was with me. 11 Therefore whether it were I or they, so we preach, and so ye believed. 12 Now if Christ be preached that he rose from the dead, how say some among you that there is no resurrection of the dead? 13 But if there be no resurrection of the dead, then is Christ not risen: 14 And if Christ be not risen, then is our preaching vain, and your faith is also vain. 15 Yea, and we are found false witnesses of God; because we have testified of God that he raised up Christ: whom he raised not up, if so be that the dead rise not. 16 For if the dead rise not, then is not Christ raised: 17 And if Christ be not raised, your faith is vain; ye are yet in your sins. 18 Then they also which are fallen asleep in Christ are perished. 19 If in this life only we have hope in Christ, we are of all men most miserable. 20 But now is Christ risen from the dead, and become the firstfruits of them that slept. 21 For since by man came death, by man came also the resurrection of the dead. 22 For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive. 23 But every man in his own order: Christ the firstfruits; afterward they that are Christ’s at his coming. 24 Then cometh the end, when he shall have delivered up the kingdom to God, even the Father; when he shall have put down all rule and all authority and power. 25 For he must reign, till he hath put all enemies under his feet. 26 The last enemy that shall be destroyed is death. 27 For he hath put all things under his feet. But when he saith all things are put under him, it is manifest that he is excepted, which did put all things under him. 28 And when all things shall be subdued unto him, then shall the Son also himself be subject unto him that put all things under him, that God may be all in all. 29 Else what shall they do which are baptized for the dead, if the dead rise not at all? why are they then baptized for the dead? 30 And why stand we in jeopardy every hour? 31 I protest by your rejoicing which I have in Christ Jesus our Lord, I die daily. 32 If after the manner of men I have fought with beasts at Ephesus, what advantageth it me, if the dead rise not? let us eat and drink; for to morrow we die. 33 Be not deceived: evil communications corrupt good manners. 34 Awake to righteousness, and sin not; for some have not the knowledge of God: I speak this to your shame. 35 But some man will say, How are the dead raised up? and with what body do they come? 36 Thou fool, that which thou sowest is not quickened, except it die: 37 And that which thou sowest, thou sowest not that body that shall be, but bare grain, it may chance of wheat, or of some other grain: 38 But God giveth it a body as it hath pleased him, and to every seed his own body. 39 All flesh is not the same flesh: but there is one kind of flesh of men, another flesh of beasts, another of fishes, and another of birds. 40 There are also celestial bodies, and bodies terrestrial: but the glory of the celestial is one, and the glory of the terrestrial is another. 41 There is one glory of the sun, and another glory of the moon, and another glory of the stars: for one star differeth from another star in glory. 42 So also is the resurrection of the dead. It is sown in corruption; it is raised in incorruption: 43 It is sown in dishonour; it is raised in glory: it is sown in weakness; it is raised in power: 44 It is sown a natural body; it is raised a spiritual body. There is a natural body, and there is a spiritual body. 45 And so it is written, The first man Adam was made a living soul; the last Adam was made a quickening spirit. 46 Howbeit that was not first which is spiritual, but that which is natural; and afterward that which is spiritual. 47 The first man is of the earth, earthy: the second man is the Lord from heaven. 48 As is the earthy, such are they also that are earthy: and as is the heavenly, such are they also that are heavenly. 49 And as we have borne the image of the earthy, we shall also bear the image of the heavenly. 50 Now this I say, brethren, that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God; neither doth corruption inherit incorruption. 51 Behold, I shew you a mystery; We shall not all sleep, but we shall all be changed, 52 In a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trump: for the trumpet shall sound, and the dead shall be raised incorruptible, and we shall be changed. 53 For this corruptible must put on incorruption, and this mortal must put on immortality. 54 So when this corruptible shall have put on incorruption, and this mortal shall have put on immortality, then shall be brought to pass the saying that is written, Death is swallowed up in victory. 55 O death, where is thy sting? O grave, where is thy victory? 56 The sting of death is sin; and the strength of sin is the law. 57 But thanks be to God, which giveth us the victory through our Lord Jesus Christ. 58 Therefore, my beloved brethren, be ye stedfast, unmoveable, always abounding in the work of the Lord, forasmuch as ye know that your labour is not in vain in the Lord.
Corinthians. More silly Christian Bible nonsense. And what is the point of those 50 quotes? Quoting a million things won't make Jesus alive again, or make him fulfill any prophecies. He failed everything, he died, he wasn't the messiah. End of story
@Jaeger Meister It's really not that complicated. Remove all the verbiage these apologists engage in here, and it comes down to a VERY simple equation "Did Jesus fulfill the prophecies in the Hebrew Bible? If he did not, he isn't the messiah." That's all there is, nothing further needs to be added or explained. And for the poor souls who continue to claim he DID fulfill prophecy, that isn't true, or I and my whole family would be in Israel right now, worshipping at the Third Temple."
We know 100% God knows the truth! ...you would think after all these years God would tell the leaders of the church whom the Jewish Messiah is. ..since the Jewish have been in worship all these years!? And God knowing they should be claiming the Trinity.?...think about the fact God 100% knows the truth!
Not even those who are circumcised keep the law, yet they want you to be circumcised that they may boast about your circumcision in the flesh. May I never boast except in the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ, through which the world has been crucified to me, and I to the world. Galatians 6:13-14 NIV
In Paul's Letters-- Paul makes a distinction between God the father and Jesus being designated as Lord.. as in the following Greeting-- " Grace and Peace to you from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ" I often wondered if Paul himself did not think That Jesus is God but only Lord-- Much like when The Pharaoh of Egypt appointed Joseph as Lord of the Land only that He as Pharaoh had authority over Joseph... does anyone have any comment on this?
I do. Don't trust anything Paul says or writes. he is a lying, blaspheming, idolatrous trickster, who's only fruits are the coldness of the grave. believing anything Paul writes or advocates can result in you losing your soul to darkness and destruction. Flee from Paul as from the plague.
In this unity with the Father Jesus, the Son, is the radiance of Gods glory and the exact representation of Gods being and in Him all things hold together. In that context Jesus is all that the Father is (God) For in Christ all the fullness of the Deity lives in bodily form but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God. There is a distinction being made that is not captured by orthodox trinity statements yet for us there is but one God, the Father, "from" whom all things came and for whom we live; and there is but one Lord, Jesus Christ, "through" whom all things came and through whom we live. Jesus, the head of the body of Christ, -"And this is eternal life, that they may know You, the "only" true God, and Jesus Christ whom You have sent
@Paula Wallace Son or wife? Irregardless. Gods literal firstborn would be a being not a people and such a being would make such a statement, "Before Abraham was born I AM"
If Jesus said that he lied. G-d said ISRAEL was his firstborn. Which means if Jesus existed at all, he'd have to come into existence after Israel was an entity. And if Jesus did come after Israel, he was no messiah or G-d, because G-d HIMSELF tells us "No G-ds were formed before me, neither were there any AFTER Me." So Jesus could not have come before Israel, and he could not have come AFTER Israel, according to the word of Hashem Himself
@@curtisscissons563 No He didn't lie. He was before Abraham was born. He was before the world began. He was before the angels of God. He was before the creation. He is the firstborn of all creation. In Him the fullness was pleased to dwell. In that unity with the Father He is the radiance of Gods glory and the exact representation of Gods being. Jesus has always been the Son and Gods firstborn is a being not a people. A beginning at some point in history before the world began but no end. The Father is His God. There is a difference in the fullness dwelling in Jesus then Jesus being that fullness. The fullness of the deity that dwells in Jesus is the Father. Another God was not formed. Jesus-Now this is eternal life: that they know you, the ONLY true God, and Jesus Christ, whom you have sent. And it was God who appointed Jesus as both Lord and Christ. So is Jesus God? He never dies. Yes, He is all that the Father is. No, He has always been the Son. The Son who was, (His spirit) was in the tent of the body that was prepared for Him. And the Spirit of the Father was living in Him. Jesus-"Father into your hands I commit my spirit" Gods Christ is forever. And in that though the earth will wear out Gods salvation will endure forever.
The concept of Messiah is different from Christian's. Jesus said "My kingdom is not wordly" whereas Jews views we're He had to deliver from physical bondage from Romans or Greeks as the case may be. Abraham wished to see the day of Messiah and he had seen. Before Abraham "I AM".
im really about you tovia and all but im just confused because if it was G-d talking to Ezra, then why would the numbers thing not be a big deal. It's supposed to be G-d's word therefore perfect. Is there just something im missing?
@@HistoryandReviews Maybe. But I know for a fact anything you have isn’t any better an explanation. It’s either Judaism is wrong or it’s not. Christianity is automatically wrong for trying to base itself on another religion. That’s it’s mistake because now it has the burden of proof. And they’re just not the same religion. Either you’re right. And Judaism is right. Or you’re both wrong. Can’t be that you’re right and he isn’t. Christianity based itself off of Judaism and therefore you by default have to agree with everything in the Tanach. And the fact of the matter is the NT and Tanach are completely different.
@@Denkin_Donuts we’re talking about why he said the Numbers thing “wasnt a big deal”. Thats an excuse on his part. The bible is imperfect therefore the belief that God wrote it is a lie and crumbles their beliefs
@@HistoryandReviews it’s a logical fallacy to state and try to prove the truth of your religion if you start from the Bible being imperfect. If you admit that your bible is written by man, or any bible, then there is no point to devoting yourself to that religion. No less banking your spiritual existence on it. You cannot simply say “the Bible is imperfect, but it’s still true and if you don’t believe in Christ you surely will be damned to hell.” This is regardless of what you may personally believe. I grew up in a Christian household and we were very loose with what we believed. And it’s because of exactly that. We didn’t take the Bible seriously in the sense that we believed it was written by a man and therefore it gave us the excuse to interpret however which way. That’s what that is. An excuse. It’s an excuse to say “if this particular part doesn’t fit my own personal ideology/belief/morals, then I can simply disregard it because it’s made by man. It’s imperfect so I won’t agree with everything it says.” That simply is no way to interpret a religion if in fact your religion stresses obedience and/or devotion to one thing or person, then threatens eternal torture if you fail to worship. You get where I’m coming from? Like I can feel you 100%. Skepticism of their side is fine and can be argued. But if you’re right, and Judaism is wrong because it’s bible is imperfect, then Christianity is wrong too. That’s what I’m saying. You’re not arguing FOR Christianity, are you?
The whole Tanach speaks about the messiah, who will come and be the savior for Israel and all the nations. In 5. Mose 18:15 It says "God will raise up a Prophet like Moses and everybody shall listen to him." In Psalm 2 It says "Kiss the son." Which son ? The answer is in proverbs 30 "Who hath ascended up into heaven, or descended? who hath gathered the wind in his fists? who hath bound the waters in a garment? who hath established all the ends of the earth? what is his name, and what is his son's name, if thou canst tell?" Its about the son of God, who came down on this earth to die for our sins so we can have eternal life with God and set us free from sin to show us how we should live in the torah. Now take a minute for yourself and read Isaiah 53 and ask God in prayer Who is it speaking about ? Do you have a son ? He will answer your question when you are hungry for the truth. :)
If you mr tovia do not believe jesus is who he says he is you will die in your sins ! Jesus said " before Abraham was , IAM " and may remind you of this truth in john 3:36 " he who believes on the son has everlasting life but he who believes not shall not see life but the wrath of God abides on Him " .
Perhaps the writer of John needed to make women look like dumb and blind cry babies...I mean Jesus could never have appeared to women first and women cannot lead and tell the men that Jesus is Risen...just saying...I have no chip on my shoulder, I'm not a feminist, but along with Pauls views on women, it smacks of more Hellenistic/greek male chauvanism.
You make a good point. A person in deep mourning after the loss of a loved one goes 3 days after their death to a Tomb only to find the body gone. Shock laden upon shock could have innumerable affects on anyone.
Part 2 of 2 The Khazar Empire The Khazars emerged on the world scene as Turkic men riding on horses coming out of the Caucasus Mountains and living a nomadic lifestyle. after many centuries the Khazars sought out a more settled way of life. The most interesting aspect about the Khazar warriors history is their adoption of the Israelite (Negro) way which they later over centuries corrupted with many pagan ways and cultures. It is said the Khazarian territory was a major settlement for many Israelite refugees escaping persecution of the gentile nations. The Khazars took on many ways of the Israelite, they even adopted the Hebrew script and Hebrew names that they still use today. The Greek historian Theophanes wrote that the Khazars were "Turks from the East" Vladimir Minorsky, wrote that the Khazars were a grouping of local nomadic tribes of southern Russia who were brought together under a new Khazar-Turkic leader. Khazaria was a Turkic semi-nomadic people. The Khazar Empire, one of the largest polities of medieval Asia (Eurasia), with a capital in Atil and comprising much of modern-day Russia, western Kazakhstan, eastern Ukraine, Azerbaijan, large portions of the Northern Caucasus Mountains (Circassia, Dagestan), parts of Georgia, the Crimea, and Northeastern Turkey. Khazaria was a successor state of the Western Turks. During the 9th and 10th centuries, Khazaria was one of the major arteries of commerce between Northern Europe and the Middle East as well as a connection to the Silk Road. The name "Khazar" is found in numerous languages and seems to be tied to a Turkic verb form meaning "wandering". urkic people (a.k.a. Khazars) believed that they could trace their descent back to Noah, who had 3 sons Shem,Ham, and Japheth. It is important to understand that all people should be able to trace their people back to the man we know as Noah. Noah and his family were the only ones to survive the world wide flood according to the bible. What is also important to know is what son did the Khazars come from. This research will establish them as true Israelites or just impostors saying they are Israel and are really not at all. Revelation 2:9 I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and [I know] the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews(Israel), and are not, but [are] the synagogue of Satan. One of the most important Khazar kings, Joseph, wrote in his celebrated reply to Hasdai ibn Shaprut that Khazars were descended from "Kozar," the seventh son of Togarmah's ten sons. From this information alone you can see that this causes a problem of biblical proportions. If one is to say that they are an Israelite then they would have to be first from the line of Shem. The Khazar king Joseph clearly states that he believed that they were from "Kozar" which, is from Togarmah which, is the son of Japheth and not Shem. Genesis 10-1-3 makes it plain. Genesis 10:3 The sons of Japheth: Gomer, Magog, Madai, Javan, Tubal, Meshech and Tiras. The sons of Gomer: Ashkenaz, Riphath and Togarmah. Now according to the book titled, The Jews of Khazaria, the author Kevin Alan Brooks presents a chart of Noah, his sons and their decedents. From this chart titled, Biblical Genealogy of the Turkic Peoples, it shows Kozar (Khazar) being the son of Togarmah which is the son of Gomer who is the son of Japheth. From this evidence the Khazars are clearly disqualified from being Yah's set apart people nor do they line up with the curses of Deuteronomy chapter 28. Yah's set apart people come from the line of Shem.
JEWS AND JESUS CHRIST. Isaiah 53 speaks about the Messiah, while Isaiah 59 speaks of Israel. (59:16) so his own arm achieved salvation for him, and his own righteousness sustained him. (59:20) “The Redeemer will come to Zion, to those in Jacob who repent of their sins,” My curiosity is when Jews can zealously experiment with TM, Hinduism, Buddhism, Zoroastrianism, and Islam, (which they consider harmless spiritual pursuits) what prevents them to diligently examine your Torah and Tanakh if they reveal Yeheshua (Jesus Christ)? Why do not you humbly ask the God of your fathers to reveal to you who Jesus Christ is? Yet my perplexity keeps me unsettled when I think about the people of Israel. How can the OT speak about a spiritual marriage (an intimate spiritual closeness) between “Yahweh Elohim” and His people in the following verses: Jeremiah 31:32, Isaiah 54:5, Hosea 2:7, Joel 1:8, Jeremiah 2:2, Hosea 2:15, Jeremiah 3:20, Jeremiah 2:32, Hosea 1:2, Hosea 2:2, Isaiah 50:1, Jeremiah 3:12-14, Isaiah 54:6-8, Hosea 2:14, Isaiah 62:4-5, Jeremiah 31:31-33, Ezekiel 16:62, Hosea 2:16.
If God is Spirit and man is a physical being with a spiritual dimension, how can this relationship come to fruition unless he comes to our level of existence? Leviticus 26:12 “I will walk among you.” Ezek 37:27 “My dwelling place also will be with them; and I will be their God, and they will be My people” Zechariah 8:8 : I will bring them back and they will live in the midst of Jerusalem; and they shall be My people, and I will be their God in truth and righteousness. I will be the God of all the families of Israel, and they shall be My people. Jeremiah 31:1. “ These are all in future tense. If these verses are to be true, then God alone should come to the earth to dwell with his people.
Zechariah 2:10 "Sing for joy and be glad, O daughter of Zion; for behold I am coming and I will dwell in your midst," declares the LORD. 11"Many nations will join themselves to the LORD in that day and will become My people. Then I will dwell in your midst, and you will know that the LORD of hosts has sent Me to you.… Isaiah 40:0-11 “”say to the towns of Judah, ‘Here is your God’ 10 See, the Sovereign Lord comes with power, and his arm rules for him, See his reward is with him, and his recompense accompanies him. He tenders his flock like a shepherd, he gathers the lambs in his arms and carries them close to heart; he gently leads those that have young.” (Please verify who fits in with this prophesy - Is it Jacob or Jesus Christ who said “I am the Good Shepherd?).
PLEASE HELP ME HERE a Christian told me that verse 9 does not have to do with 10.... he said this "In Hebrew there is no conjunction when the prepositions are included, as here the Vav does not function as a copulative, but rather as an inseparable preposition to indicate the object of the sentence " Zechariah 9:9-10 King James Version (KJV) 9 Rejoice greatly, O daughter of Zion; shout, O daughter of Jerusalem: behold, thy King cometh unto thee: he is just, and having salvation; lowly, and riding upon an ass, and upon a colt the foal of an ass. 10 ((And)) hebrew-->(Vav) I will cut off the chariot from Ephraim, and the horse from Jerusalem, and the battle bow shall be cut off: and he shall speak peace unto the heathen: and his dominion shall be from sea even to sea, and from the river even to the ends of the earth. he says between verse 9 and 10 there are thousands of years by the middle... that 9 and 10 are diferents events with thousands of years by the middle he said that the first event just happened with jesus verse 9 is that true? excuse my english
@@curtisscissons563 HEY, HI.. a Christian told me that verse 9 does not have to do with 10.... he said this "In Hebrew there is no conjunction when the prepositions are included, as here the Vav does not function as a copulative, but rather as an inseparable preposition to indicate the object of the sentence " Zechariah 9:9-10 King James Version (KJV) 9 Rejoice greatly, O daughter of Zion; shout, O daughter of Jerusalem: behold, thy King cometh unto thee: he is just, and having salvation; lowly, and riding upon an ass, and upon a colt the foal of an ass. 10 ((And)) hebrew-->(Vav) I will cut off the chariot from Ephraim, and the horse from Jerusalem, and the battle bow shall be cut off: and he shall speak peace unto the heathen: and his dominion shall be from sea even to sea, and from the river even to the ends of the earth. he says between verse 9 and 10 there are thousands of years by the middle... that 9 and 10 are diferents events with thousands of years by the middle he said that the first event just happened with jesus verse 9 is that true? excuse my english
The English is no problem. As for the question, anytime a Christian tells you anything about Hebrew, or the Hebrew Bible, they are usually wrong. It's either deliberate, or they don't know any better. The only way to avoid such confusion is to not listen to anything a Christian tells you about "Jesus in the OT" Think about their claim for a minute.. The biggest event in the whole history of mankind, the arrival of the messiah, and event that would re-shape the world, and the best they can come up with is ONE SINGLE HEBREW LETTER IN Zechariah??" You see how silly it is, when looked at logically? But let's get to your point.. The whole thing rests on a mistake that in this case the Vav (Hebrew for and" when attached to a word like this), does not act as "and" in this case. This is flat-out wrong, and can be seen in several verses right above this one. The beginning of verse 10 is "And". But they never tell you the same exact letter configuration is ALSO in Verse 7, and verse 8. Verses 7,8 and 10 all say "and I will" Verse 7 "and I will take" verse 8 "And I will encamp" and verse 10 "And I will cut off" There is not several thousand year time jump here. This is a standard Christian tactic called "Progressive revelation" and is nonsense. Don't believe a word of it.
Yes l can see your confusion. Often in recording events there do appear to be apparent contradictions. However when all four records are put together it becomes clear that there is no contradictions.
LOL No not at all. Its just that we are often unable to understand how they are all saying the same thing. This is very very common when we read testimonies from four witnesses.
@@jacobdaniel5989 All four Gospel writers say that Christ died on the Preparation day. Ie the preparation of the Passover. The Passover is always on the 14th. Christ died on the Wednesday.
@@HomeBibleCollege So if it was preparation day on which Yeshua died, how is it they had the last supper together: the traitor headed out supposedly to get some things for the feast? I don't know about you, but I assumed that it was the Passover that Yeshua was partaking in, due to Peter's question where do you want us to go to make preparations for the Passover. If that's the case, then preparation day was long since passed after this main Passover day, at least by 2 days. Can you please explain that one to me?
It’s interesting to see a rabbi point out some contradictions pointed already by some muslims regarding the numbers in Tanak. And also the history regarding how the jewish bible has been rewrited after during the exile. I’m not going to discuss more about the non sense of Christianity and the christian bible. God is One. There no God to be worship except the only One true God. The God of Adam, Noah, Abraham, Moses, Jesus (he is a human being), Mohammed and all the prophets and messenger. But today the only Holy book with no contradictions and which is the only one we can reproduce originaly is all books are lost is the Quran. I would really want to have the Rabbi perspective about the histories of Moses for example according to Quran. What I get from islamic scholars is that the history of the Prophets in the Quran are some keys elements God wanted to clarify to humans like the story of Aron with the cow or Job or Noah etc just to correct some narrations regarding the Bible and to clear the prophets honors. What is your personnal point of view Rabbi regarding Quran?
@@89pok I was asking to the Rabbi. Not to someone who lacks knowledge and an Islam hater. At the end, what is the book memorized by millions from page to page? What is the book which is the most preserved? For Muslims, prophets are the best of human beings and that’s why they were choosen by God to be prophets and they obey to God. Muslims don’t disrespect prophets and do not lie about God message. So really, I really do not care about your opinion and I am not here to debate or try to convince about anything. Have a nice day and peace be with you ✌🏾
Exodus 20:2-4 Thou shalt have no other Gods before me... Numbers 6:24-26 The Lord bless you and keep you ( Jehovah ) The Lord make his face shine on you and be gracious to you ( Jesus ) The Lord turn his face toward you and give you peace ( Jacob ) Luke 6:46 Why do you call me, Lord, Lord and do not do what I say? Isaiah ( Prophet for the last days ) 28:11 Because with stammering lips and with another tongue will he speak to this people. 29:22 Not now shall Jacob be ashamed and his face shall not grow pale. John 4:24 God ( Jehovah ) is Spirit... ( And he can rest that Spirit on any man he chooses ) 1Peter 3:12-13 For the eyes of the Lord ( Jesus ) are on the righteous and his ears are attentive to their prayer. But the face of the Lord ( Jacob ) is against those who do evil. Who is going to harm you if you are eager to do good? Psalm 135:4 For the Lord has chosen Jacob to be his own. Israel to be his treasured possession. Psalm 136:3 O give thanks unto the Lord of Lords, for his mercy endureth forever. WORSHIP ONE GOD JEHOVAH Jehovah - Jesus - Jacob
Contrary to the popular lie the Israelite (Negro) Bible is not a Christian book, nor were the followers of Christ Christians (but Israelite who were called Christians-Acts 11:26 and Niger-Acts 13:1), nor is there any Christian doctrine written in the Israelite Bible (Negro History and Law Book).
@Deals Durbanplease show me book, chapter and verse were the Armenian fled into Africa and later came to the America's on cargo slave ships (?) you people delusional.
@Deals Durbin Some people come in here with one thought only, and no matter what you try to tell them,. they ignore it and keep harping on the same subject over and over. Make Hood doesn't want to discuss anything, he's just got this pet theory that the ACTUAL Jews are black, and he won't listen to reason,. or engage in rational discussion. Best to move on
You will see that Yeshua never contradicted the Torah. He fulfilled the Torah by offering up himself as a sacrifice so that you could have salvation. Is that not the work of a loving GOD?
No. Because G-d himself says one person can't atone for another's sins. If Jesus says the opposite, he's lying, and just one more reason why any righteous person should want nothing to do with the Christian Bible
If there were two numbers as a result of the count of men of fighting age, and one includes Benjamin and Levi, 1 Chronicles 21:5; and the other excludes Benjamin and Levi, 2 Samuel24:9, surely there must have been two counts. Because how would you know how many men there were including Benjamin and Levi, if you hadn't counted them. And 1 Chronicles 21:6 says Benjamin and Levi were specifically excluded because Joab did not follow King David's orders. So logically, Joab could not have been able to count all the men including Benjamin and Levi, and count all the men, excluding Benjamin and Levi, at the same time! Sorry, but you can't have it both ways, it would make logical nonsense. And the numbers for the men of Judah are reversed. There were more "valiant" men (500,000) in 2 Samuel 24:9, than ordinary, or "non-valiant" men (470,000) in 1Chronicles 21:5, which belies the theory of there generally being less "valiant" men. Therefore, the Old Testament also contains at least one unexplainable contradiction.
Why didn't the Angel of YHWH know that Abram/Abraham had another (and older) son -- Ishmael -- when He prevented him from following through with the almost-sacrifice of Isaac? He refers to "your son, your ONLY son Isaac, whom you love" [Gen. 22:2] and "your son, your ONLY son" [Gen. 22:12], despite the fact that "God said to Abraham, 'Be not displeased because of the lad [Ishmael] and because of your slave woman [Ishmael's mother Hagar] . . . I will make a nation of the son of the slave woman also, because he is YOUR OFFSPRING" [Gen. 21:12-13]. This, it seems to me, is a glaring contradiction, and not merely from one set of scriptures to another -- i.e. Old vs. New Testaments -- and not between two books within a canon -- i.e. Kings vs. Chronicles -- but within a single book [i.e. Genesis], a mere chapter apart. I could buy into the notion that we're talking about differing source texts utilized by the author(s) of Genesis -- the "J", "E", "P", and "D" sources hypothesized in the Documentary Hypothesis -- sources with differing information that nonetheless were all included and not 'harmonized' by a Redactor, but I would be interested in hearing someone such as you make an attempt to 'solve' this contradiction. Was Ishmael the son of Abram/Abraham or not? And, if he was, why wouldn't the Angel of YHWH acknowledge this, instead implying that Isaac is Abraham's ONLY son?
Ishmael was conceived for one reason and one reason alone: Abraham didn't believe G-d could allow Sarah to have a child, so he took matters into his own hands. Between this and essentially disinheriting him by leaving him to die in the desert, Ishmael was completely and totally discounted.
With all due respect, you're wrong. In Genesis 15, Abram laments that Eliezer of Damascus will inherit his estate, rather than a child of his own, but then God promises Abram that "a son coming from your own body will be your heir" . . . and we're told "Abram believed the LORD, and he credited it to him as righteousness." God then affirms that "To your descendants I give this land" etc. etc. Genesis 16 opens with Sarai saying to her husband Abram: "The LORD has kept me from having children. Go, sleep with my maidservant; perhaps I can build a family through her." Sarai must have been sleeping with Abram before this incident -- trying and failing to become impregnated by her husband; however, she deduces that YHWH Himself is the root cause of her barrenness, saying He "has kept me from having children." Up until this point, all God had promised Abram was that his descendants will inherit his estate and take possession of the Promised Land -- and a child begotten on Sarai's maidservant literally would fit the bill just as well as a later 'miraculously' begotten child on Sarai would. Ishmael is just as much of a 'descendant' of Abram as Isaac is. Isaac was NOT Abram's "only" son, though he may very well have been the only son he truly loved -- not even intervening when Sarai (into whose hands he had given her maidservant Hagar) called for him to "Get rid of the slave woman [Hagar] and her son [Ishmael], because God told him [now Abraham] "Do not be so distressed about the boy and your maidservant. Listen to whatever Sarah tells you, because it is through Isaac that your offspring will be reckoned. I will make the son of the maidservant into a nation also, because he is your offspring." Ishmael "IS YOUR OFFSPRING," God tells Abraham, his son through Hagar. If God can demand that Abraham's inheritance shall proceed through his son born to Sarai/Sarah, well, that's all fine and dandy . . . but to pretend that Isaac is Abraham's ONLY son is just a lie. There's no excuse for the same God who expressly stated that Ishmael "is your offspring" to later declare Isaac to be "your only son." If God had opened Sarai's womb earlier, and enabled her to conceive sooner, then she would not have resorted to the desperate ploy of having her husband sleep with Hagar -- and God COULD have closed up Hagar's womb so as not to have had Ishmael enter the picture in the first place. To this day, the supposed descendants of Ishmael -- the Arab peoples -- claim descent from their father, whom they call Ibrahim. Ishmael never sold whatever 'birthright' he should have had as the Firstborn son of Abraham -- unlike Esau, who sold his birthright to Jacob. Don't modern orthodox Jews consider the Arab peoples to be Ishmaelites, their fellow descendants from father Abraham? So, why does an "angel of the Lord" refer to Isaac as Abraham's ONLY son, contradicting God Himself -- who "is" himself?
@@patricktilton5377 Oh, of course. I'm the one whose wrong. It,as not like I've spent half my life studying this exact tractate in it's original language. Ishmael had no reason to exist, and as you yourself had said: Isaac is the only one that will inherit anything as dictated by G-d. As far as anything else is concerned Ishmael is as good as dead by this point. He has no inheritance because G-d commands him to have no inheritance.
Regardless of whether or not Ishmael was ever to inherit anything, he was the son of Abraham before Isaac was ever conceived, and he was still alive when the angel of the Lord spoke of Isaac as Abraham's "only son" -- which makes the Lord and/or His angel to be confused, mistaken, or a liar. As for Ishmael having had no reason to exist -- your words! -- the only reason he was begotten (according to these stories) is because Sarai was desperate to provide a son for her husband, yet God had closed her womb -- causing her to have her husband beget a child on her handmaiden. If God would just have opened Sarai's womb, there wouldn't have been any future conflicts involving the Abrahamic offspring of Ishmael and Isaac. For what it's worth, I don't consider Genesis to be 'history': it's a collection of stories written well after-the-fact by people trying to justify their claims to the real estate between Egypt and the lands occupied by the Hittites and Mesopotamians. You probably disagree with my view. But, regardless, I have long felt that we can't understand the present-day conflicts in the Middle East without an understanding of the scriptural bases for the claims made by the people who claim descent from Isaac or Ishmael. We are trapped in a 3,000 year old storyline, whether we like it or not, whether we believe the story is literally true or not. I myself DON'T believe the story is true, one reason being that the 'god' character makes the mistake of contradicting Himself -- saying (on the one hand) that Ishmael is Abraham's offspring, then (on the other hand) saying that Isaac is Abraham's "only son." Your attempt at an interpretation for this flub just doesn't cut it with me. Let's agree to just disagree, okay?
The Bible story can be put into mathematical form with significant numbers 1, 3 and 9. When the number 9 is reached, everything is ready. This simple formula has reached with Gentile math. Through it, it may seem true that the Jews' thinking of the Trinity is wrong. It's not what they claim. God is perfection when he has created something and there is a trinity in it. When God created the right and wrong, there is a trinity that is GOOD. When God created man, there are three and it was GOOD. GOD, man, and woman. Family; man woman, and son All of them have GOD over everyone else. To make humankind ONE, there's needed Jesus, Israel and Gentiles. God is over all.
@Deals Durban God is number ONE and humankind have to reach to number 9. When God made the covenant with Israel, God set the law so that all three are in harmony. These; God, man and Israel. Therefore the law was collective in nature and bound the sins of the individual to influence the fate of the whole nation. In this way a second triangle was created. I added the third triangle to my previous message. Of these three steps, 3x3 = 9 is generated 1Cor. 15:28 And when all things shall be subdued unto him, then shall the Son also himself be subject unto him that put all things under him, that God may be all in all. Do you see the trinity? Trinity up and trinity down. In the law of God, collectivity is in a high position! We'll do the work for everyone like our savior so that no one is left out!
@Ricardo Petrov OO! Can I say it too? I have way better comments on Jesus than Paula does! How about... "This Jesus person is nothing but the incarnation of a bunch of deluded gullible sheep, who wanted the promises G-d gave to the Jews, but not the responsibilities. Jesus has brought nothing but pain and sorrow to the world, and the fact that he's dead is the REAL "Good News" The hands of Jesus and his followers are dripping with the blood of millions of my ancestors, all for the crime of not bowing down to a fake, dead, failed messiah. No other entity in the whole of human history has been responsible for more death and torture than Jesus and his followers. Christianity preaches love, but PRACTICES hate, in perfect harmony with their cult leader, Jesus." Is that enough to get me "reported" too? Or would you like more? Tip, this was actually the "G"-rated version. You don't want to read my PG one.
Their will never be a third temple built for one.. and second the true pedigree of the 12 tribes are no longer in existence and the messiah would have to be a direct descendent of David. With more then thousands of yrs lost and intermingled with other lineages....come on that's a total shame. Whoever denies the son on earth jesus my father God will denies he or she.
Isaiah ( Prophet for the last days ) in Great Isaiah Scroll: 43:1 But now thus says YHWH your creator, Jacob, and the one who formed you O Israel.... 43:4 Because you were precious in my sight, you have been glorified and I loved you. Therefore I give the men for you and people instead for your soul. 43:7 for I have created him for my glory, I have formed him, yes, I have made him. ( Jacob a Hebrew man final servant of Jehovah ) 43:27-28 Your first father sinned and your leaders transgressed against me. And I have cursed the princes of holiness and gave Jacob to the curse and Israel to reproaches. ( Gave Jacob to the curse ) 53:4 Surely our griefs he is bearing and our sorrows he carried them and we esteemed him beaten and struck God and afflicted. 53:7 He was oppressed and he was afflicted and not open his mouth, as a lamb to the slaughter he is brought..... 53:8 Because from the transgressions of his people a wound was to him. 53:10 And YHWH was pleased to crush him and he has caused him grief. 53:11 and by his knowledge shall he make righteous my righteous servant and their iniquities he will bear. 53:12 he laid bare to death his soul and with the transgressors he was numbered, and he, the sins of many he bore.... ( These verses are not about Jesus.Definitely not about Israel. They are about Jacob a Hebrew man final servant of Jehovah ) Isaiah ( Prophet for the last days ) Masoretic Text: 53:3 a man of pains and acquainted with disease and as one whom men hide their face.... 53:4 We did esteem him stricken, smitten of YHWH and afflicted. Babylonian Talmud Sanhedrin 98b The Rabbi's said: His name is the leper scholar, as it is written. Surely he hath borne our griefs and carried our sorrows. Yet we did esteem him a leper, smitten of YHWH and afflicted. ( Rabbi's debating the name of the Messiah from Isaiah chapter 53 ) Psalm 135:4 For the Lord has chosen Jacob to be his own. Israel to be his treasured possession. Jehovah - Jesus - Jacob
Had the sun risen when the women arrived at the tomb? Dr. Pinchas Lapide is the author of "The Resurrection of Jesus: A Jewish Perspective" and he wrote the following (pp. 114-115): "Matthew puts [the resurrection] at night, right after the end of the Sabbath, but Mark and Luke in the early Easter Sunday morning. The obscure formulation of Matthew, which is awkward in Greek (28:1) 'now after the Sabbath, toward the dawn of the first day of the week (or: of the Sabbath),' or according to the Elberfeld translation, 'Late on the Sabbath in the dawn of the first day of the week...' seems to be based on an idiom current in Mishnah Hebrew: Bemotzaei-Shabbat or le-ehad be-Shabbat which means literally: 'At the end of the Sabbath in the light toward the first day...,' but which, by means of a euphemism (light = night) intends to say nothing else but: 'at the end of the Sabbath, in the night before Sunday.' Basic is the fact that the Sabbath since Genesis 1:5 begins on Friday evening and ends on the next evening just as each new day lasts 'from evening to evening' (Lev. 23:32). Unfamiliarity with this Hebraism seems to have led to contradictory statements of time in the Gospels. The dejection of the disciples since Good Friday speaks in any case in favor of a visit to the tomb as early as possible, i.e., at the beginning of the night which coincides with the end of the Sabbath as is testified by the retranslation into Hebrew of the passage which is so obscure in Greek." Lev. 23:32 - "From evening unto evening shall ye keep your Sabbath." Also, we have to consider that any part of a day was regarded as a FULL DAY. We see this very clearly in the Book of Esther: Esther 4:16 - "Go ... neither eat nor drink three days, night or day ... and so will I go in unto the king." Esther 5:1 - "On the third day Esther put on her royal robes and stood in the inner court of the palace, in front of the king's hall." If Esther had to wait a full 72 hours, then why doesn't the verse say "On the fourth day" or "After the third day"...? Why? Because any part of a day in Judaism is counted as a full day - even when the specific provision "night and day" is given. The Jewish Encyclopedia states: "In Jewish communal life part of a day is at times reckoned as one day; e.g., the day of the funeral, even when the latter takes place late in the afternoon, is counted as the first of the seven days of mourning; a short time in the morning of the seventh day is counted as the seventh day; circumcision takes place on the eighth day, even though of the first day only a few minutes remained after the birth of the child, these being counted as one day. Again, a man who hears of a vow made by his wife or his daughter, and desires to cancel the vow, must do so on the same day on which he hears of it, as otherwise the protest has no effect; even if the hearing takes place a little time before night, the annulment must be done within that little time. The day is reckoned from evening to evening...." The bottom line is this.... The women went to the tomb immediately following the termination of Shabbat on Saturday evening, after the first three stars appeared in the sky, which officially started the first day of the week. Cf. "Twilight, Sunset and Night" by Rabbi David Bassous.
Matthew 15:14 King James Version (KJV) 14 Let them alone: they be blind leaders of the blind. And if the blind lead the blind, both shall fall into the ditch.
Jesus said call no man rabbi or father other than himself,or you can call your bilogicial Dad father but as a Christian no we are not to call anyone rabbi or Father nor have female preaching an we do we are in the end of END TIME everything Bible says has happened or happening now open your eyes an find the true Messiah Lord Jesus Christ
But we have the Oral Torah that explains apparent contradictions. If you say so does the Christian holy books, than you have to accept ours. You can't cherry pick one without the other.
@@chanitalevitz4945 Some of the "contradictions" this person is expressing can actually be understood reading the Torah itself, I am sure that this person is not reading the surrounding verses as many of these claims wouldn't exist if he did. But yes the Oral Torah does explain at length all apparent contradictions
“Jesus is not the Mesiah, because there is no relationship between what the Tenarkh teaches, and what the Mashiach is supposed to do; and what the Christian Bible, and Church tells us Jesus did.” The Rabbi makes this bombshell statement early in the talk, and then does absolutely nothing to substantiate it. The facts are completely the opposite. Right through the Tenarkh, from Genesis, through to Malachi, there are scores of passages pointing forward to the Mashiach, which are fulfilled by Jesus. I can’t cover them all here, but the following are just a few of them. 1. Abraham said, “God will provide for himself the lamb for a burnt offering, my son.” (Genesis 22:8) God sacrificed that Lamb of God in 31AD On the day of preparation for Passover, at the very time when the Passover lamb was being slaughtered. 2. God promised Abraham that the whole world would be blessed through his offspring (singular). (Gen 22:18) Who is the seed of Abraham through whom the whole world has been blessed? Who has more hospitals, schools, taking literacy and health to more remote parts of the world, bringing salvation to more people, giving them hope joy freedom and love, and bringing more people into the worship of the God of Israel, then anybody living in the world today, or in history? There is none like Jesus! 3. God made His covenant with Judah, "The sceptre shall not depart from Judah, nor a lawgiver from between his feet, until Shiloh come; and unto him shall the gathering of the people be," (Gen. 49:10) The Talmud says, “When the members of the Sanhedrin found themselves deprived of their right over life and death, they covered their heads with ashes and their bodies with sackcloth, and bemoaned, ‘Woe unto us for the scepter has departed from Judah and the Messiah has not come!’"(The Babylonian Talmud, Chapter 4, folio 37) They actually thought that the Torah, the Word of God, had failed! At that very moment there was an 8-9 year old boy growing up in Galilee called Yeshua. If Jesus isn’t the Messiah, then God has broken his covenant with Judah 4. God made a covenant with David, “I will establish the throne of his kingdom for ever. And your house and your knigdom shall be made sure for ever before me; your throne shall be established for ever." (2 Samuel 7: 12-17) Jesus is the fulfilment of that promise. Without Jesus as King of Kings, then that is another promise that God has broken. 5. All through the Pentateuch, God emphasises that for sin to be forgiven, then there must be the shedding of blood. From Adam and Eve’s first sin, Cain and Able, Noah, Abraham, the Passover, Moses and Aaron, David, and sacrifices in the Temple. “Moses said to Aaron, ‘Come to the altar and sacrifice your sin offering and your burnt offering and make atonement for yourself and the people; sacrifice the offering that is for the people and make atonement for them, as the LORD has commanded’." (Leviticus 9:7) However the, Talmud says, “Our Rabbis taught: during the last forty years before the destruction of the Temple the lot [‘For the Lord’] did not come up in the right hand; nor did the crimson-coloured strap become white; nor did the westernmost light shine; and the doors of the Hekal would open by themselves...”( Yoma 39b) All of these incidences were signs that God had not accepted their sacrifice. What happened just forty years before the temple was destroyed in 70AD? The Lamb of God was sacrificed. Since then, for 1990 years, the Jews who have rejected their Mashiach, have failed to keep the laws of Moses, regarding the sin sacrifices for attonement; since the Lamb of God, which God had promised to Abraham 2000 years earlier, was sacrificed on Calvary in 31AD; so that anyone who would accept him and believe on him, should not perish, but have eternal life. 6. Jeremiah said, “The days are coming,” declares the Lord, “when I will make a new covenant with the people of Israel and with the people of Judah... This is the covenant I will make with the people of Israel after that time, I will put my law in their minds and write it on their hearts. I will be their God, and they will be my people. (Jeremiah 31:31,33) Luke 22:20 says, "In the same way, after the supper He took the cup, saying, 'This cup is the new covenant in My blood, which is poured out for you." The new covenant means we can go directly to God through the Mashiach. If you wanted me to, I could go on with scores of examples of how the Tenarkh points forward to the Messiah, and how Jesus, and only Jesus, fulfils those writings. I’ll let you come to your own conclusions as to why the Rabbi should make such a bombshell of a statement, which is so patently untrue.
Actually youre confused. The blood of the new covenant was not blood from a literal cross just as his flesh was not literal manna, and circumcision is of the heart not flesh, and the temple is not made with literal stones. Romans desribes that we are reconciled for our PAST SINS because of his righteousness and obedience (death to his carnal man on his cross of self denial). Thats why he told his deciples to pick up their cross, deny themselves, and follow after him. How could they do that if he hadnt even died on a cross yet? And if its a literal cross and we must follow after him then there are a lot of Christians who have yet to die on a literal cross. The issue? Jesus never died on a literal cross as it was never necessary in the new covenant and God forbade human sacrifice and a brother cannot ransom another brother. You must die for your own future sins on your own cross like he did first as a LIVING SACRIFICE. Unfortunately, You do not know the old covenant nor do you realize the NT has been corrupted by Rome. Thats why you were told to establish his word by 2 or 3 witnesses and we are told that law and the prophets are the witness by which we compare. It must at least match that and God NEVER changes nor lied. The trinity is also a lie. All you have to do is compare the stories. Theres no way the birth and resurrection stories are true the way they are given. But the truth is there for those willing to study the OT types.
@@RoseSharon7777 Thank you for your reply. I can assure you I am not confused. I know that Jesus was the Lamb of God, prophesied by Abraham, that He was sacrificed on the eve of Passover, at the time the Passover lambs were being slaughtered in the year 32AD, He died for the sins of many, as prophesied by Isiah, “For he bore the sin of many, and made intercession for the transgressors.” (Isiah 53:12) He bore my sins, and also died for your sins, but that atonement only comes into effect when you accept it. All the parties involved with, and present at his execution by crucifixion; the Romans, the Jews, and His followers; all agree on these points: 1. It was really Jesus who was crucified. (this is the best documented event in ancient history, by a long way.) 2. He was crucified on the eve of Passover, at the time the sacrificial lamb was being slaughtered. 3. He was really dead. 4. He was placed in the tomb of Joseph of Arimathea. 5. On the Sunday, following the Sabbaths, the tomb was empty. That is as far as agreement goes. The Jews then claim that the tomb was empty because His disciples stole the body; while His followers claim that He rose from the dead: they saw, talked with, touched, and ate with Him, before He ascended into Heaven forty days later. (If you want to know why I believe the apostles’ accounts are true, just question me and I will be happy to give you the rational reasons that come to the logical conclusion that Jesus rose from the dead.) You say, “The blood of the new covenant was not blood from a literal cross.” I’m sorry to have to correct you, but all those involved with the crucifixion knew that it was Jesus mwho was crucified on a real cross, He bled real blood, He was really dead, and when the soldier thrust a spear into his side, real congealed blood gushed out. He was obedient unto death! “And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself by becoming obedient to death-- even death on a cross!” (Paul, Philippians 2:8) If you are going to be obedient, then it must be obedience in the real world; not just your imagination. You point out that Jesus commanded His followers to take up their cross. Many of his followers did literally take up their crosses. All of the apostles, except John, met with violent, torturous deaths, for proclaiming that Jesus had been crucified for the sins of the world, and that He was risen from the dead. Even today many of His followers are being violently murdered by Isis, and other atheistic, and antichrist powers. You say, “You must die for your own future sins on your own cross like he did first as a LIVING SACRIFICE” Jesus made the complete sacrifice for the sins of the world! Isiah prophesied, “10Yet it was the Lord’s will to crush him and cause him to suffer, and though the Lord makes his life an offering for sin,... 11After he has suffered, he will see the light of life and be satisfied; by his knowledge my righteous servant will justify many, and he will bear their iniquities. 12... he poured out his life unto death, and was numbered with the transgressors. For he bore the sin of many, and made intercession for the transgressors.” (Is 53:10-12) This is clearly stating that the Messiah would be sacrificed for the sins of many, that He would die, and that He would come back to life. This passage comes as part of a graphic description of Jesus’ crucifixion 750 years before the crucifixion. The phrase, “LIVING SACRIFICE” comes from Paul in Romans 12:1 “Therefore, I urge you, brothers and sisters, in view of God's mercy, to offer your bodies as a living sacrifice, holy and pleasing to God--this is your true and proper worship.” Paul is urging us to live for God, our whole lives, because Jesus loves us so much, that He gave His whole life to save us from sin. Therefore, don’t make dead sacrifices of dead animals, or futile sacrifices as a suicide bomber; but a living sacrifice of our whole lives. You say, “the NT has been corrupted by Rome,” but give absolutely no evidence to corroborate your statement. If you make grand statements like this, then you really should substantiate them, otherwise they aren’t worth replying to. The New Testament, especially the Gospels, are the most critiqued books in history, but they are still the biggest selling, and influential books in history. What amazes me though, is that despite all the documented records of Jesus’ crucifixion, that there are people today, who would believe a man who came along 600 years later, who said it was OK to lie, so long it was helping to spread Islam, who married a six year old girl, and consummated that marriage when she was eleven, and who spread his lies through violent terror; who claimed that Jesus wasn’t crucified, nor did He die. Without His death; there is no salvation. May God bless you, and may you find the Truth.
There are NO contradicts in the new testament your reading through the eyes of men and without the Spirit . the new testament is the pure word of God and i will take the new testament over the views and opinions of men any day of the week !
Avraham, your father, was glad that he would see my day; then he saw it and was overjoyed.” “Why, you’re not yet fifty years old,” the Judeans replied, “and you have seen Avraham?” Yeshua said to them, “Yes, indeed! Before Avraham came into being, I AM!” At this, they picked up stones to throw at him; but Yeshua was hidden and left the Temple grounds.
Since it is possible to mesh all 4 Gospel accounts of the cross and the tomb it is showing quite clearly that the 'experts' cannot to that so when there are more that 24 long passages about 'the day of the lord' it would be even more above their pay-grade. I'm quite sure that was not intended but it is what it is. All the women leave the site of the cross at the same time and Jesus is put into a tomb close by and a rock rolled into place. Passover comes and goes, the weekly Sabbath comes and goes and about 6AM that same group of women (with Peter) leave Jerusalem to go to the tomb. Mary M. goes ahead and sees the rock has been moved so she runs back to the same group and tells them that. Mary of Bethany out runs Peter and waits for him to enter the tomb. Since it is much different that when her own brother was resurrected a few days ago she knew He had been resurrected rather than his body stolen. Joh:20:1-10: The first day of the week cometh Mary Magdalene early, when it was yet dark, unto the sepulchre, and seeth the stone taken away from the sepulchre. Then she runneth, and cometh to Simon Peter, and to the other disciple, whom Jesus loved, and saith unto them, They have taken away the Lord out of the sepulchre, and we know not where they have laid him. Peter therefore went forth, and that other disciple, and came to the sepulchre. So they ran both together: and the other disciple did outrun Peter, and came first to the sepulchre. And he stooping down, and looking in, saw the linen clothes lying; yet went he not in. Then cometh Simon Peter following him, and went into the sepulchre, and seeth the linen clothes lie, And the napkin, that was about his head, not lying with the linen clothes, but wrapped together in a place by itself. Then went in also that other disciple, which came first to the sepulchre, and he saw, and believed. For as yet they knew not the scripture, that he must rise again from the dead. Then the disciples went away again unto their own home. Insert the version from Luke. Isa:53 says Jesus would be a 'plain looking person' so He was in a perfected body when Mary M. mistook him for the Gardner. That was the case where Peter was naked as well. Mary of Bethany was the first to see Him for who He was.
Five witnesses, five different stories-isn't that what always happens? Here is discussed the accounts of one eye-witness (John) and the story retold by Matthew. Add the other Gospel accounts and it gets even more confusing. It can be explained without too much torture. They tell the same story of and empty tomb, Mary Magdalene's encounter with Jesus and her telling the disciples after Peter and John's own discovery. But do the details even matter? The only important thing is the resurrection-which is not contradicted by the accounts. That nagging resurrection which kept the disciples centered as they argued over circumcision, what to eat, the Law, tradition-and how to deal with the gentiles. So Peter, who saw with his own eyes would say to those who didn't regarding the grace of God, "and though you have not seen Him, ...you greatly rejoice." The grace of God that I've heard you preach yourself, Tovia, is not relegated to one nation. This is about one obscure nomad's faith being communicated to everyone. "God so loved the world..." as the phrase goes-not just Abraham. But through him, "all nations would be blessed." That's what Jesus and the resurrection is about. And I'd say in spite of the weakness of men since, the empty tomb has worked gloriously.
You mentioned the Jews were in exile for 70 years. Do you realize the Persians revised the timeline? Lol. They did. They added 30 extra years to the rule of Darius I to make him old enough to be the grandfather of "Artaxerxes" who was actually Xerxes! Current historians and archaeologists are covering up the revisions. When they added 30 years to the reign of Darius, they removed 26 years from the Neo-Babylonian kings. So the popular NB period is 26 years shorter than the bible's NB period. The bible and Josephus introduce a 70-year desolation period beginning with the last deportation in year 23 of Nebuchadnezzar. (Jer. 52:30). Current popular history reflects just 44 years from year 23. What's fun is checking out Persian archaeology. Records show Darius began the city in his 4th year, but he barely finished one building, his palace. This proves he died early in his reign in his 6th year, as the Bible says at Ezra 6:14, 15, placing "Artaxerxes" on the throne that same year. The Babylonian chronicle clearly states it was "copied" (revised) in year 22 of Darius (II). So we know it was the Persians who revised the timeline. But also of note from archaeology is evidence from Ashkelon that there was a 70-80 year desolation between the NB period ending in the Persian period. The bible says Ashkelon was destroyed after Jerusalem. So no problem harmonizing the facts once you correct the timeline. You also understand how Nehemiah can return with Zerubbabel and be at least age 30 and still live down into the reign of Darius II. Per the expanded Persian timeline, he'd be close to 150 years of age. So scholars claim the Nehemiah that returned with Zerubbabel is a different person than who served as cupbearer under Artaxerxes. Bottom line is, you can't have a 70-year desolation/exile period starting from year 23 without correcting the timeline. Scholars are thus incompetent or liars. We have plenty of evidence to correct the timeline! Let me know if you want more information. But you should know bible chronologists have reset the timeline to the original dates. You should at least be aware of this. Radiocarbon-14 can be used to determine precise dates from the Exodus to the return from Babylon. One unfortunate casualty is the book of Esther, which is actually about Nehemiah, whose Babylonian name is Marduka (Mordecai). Esther is thus only pseudo-historical. Thanks again for your videos.
@@curtisscissons563 Esther is an adaptation of the story of Nehemiah. In the original folkloric version, Nehemiah, being a eunuch, wss wildly effeminate. The Jews made fun of him and basically turned him into s "flaming queen" of the court before splitting his character between Esther and Mordecai, turning him into a real woman In the folkloric version, Nehemiah has a crush on the handsome king, Artaxerxes, and when he requests to leave and return home. he is sitting on the king's lap and "batting his eyes" at the king. It is very embarrassing. So they just turned him into a real woman and it became a very popular fable. But the basic story is the same. Both Nehemiah and Esther get bad news from home and want the sympathy of the king, so they first get him in a good mood with food and drink before showing him how upset and sad they are. The grants them their desire and somewhere down the road, Nehemiah and Esther get the Jews to take up arms in self defense. In the meantime, Nehemiah/Mordecai (Marduka) becomes very celebrated by Artaxerxes and second in the kingdom. Thus you can see Artaxerxes with his Jewish cupbearer, Nehemiah, all over Persepolis. So the book is not inspired.
@Paula Wallace Lol. Check it out. Artaxerxes is buried between Darius I and Darius II. Xerxes and Artaxerxes were the same king. But you will never believe it unless you check it out yourself. Just dismissing it as "TWISTING" is not good enough this time. Don't listen to pagan lies; trust the Bible. The truth is going to come out eventually, not to worry.
@Paula Wallace Three books in the current canon are not inspired and were not cross-quoted from by NT writers, so no problem dismissing them: Esther. Song of Solomon, and Ecclesiates. The LXX version of Esther has her married to Artaxerxes. But when that overlapped canonical Nehemiah and it was clear Mordecai and Nehemiah were the same person, they changed the Hebrew version claiming she was married to "Ahasuerus"/Xerxes. So your choice which one you want to believe. Josephus, who clearly knew Esther and Mordecai was a treatment of Nehemiah uses the LXX to link Esther to Artaxerxes, the "son of Xerxes," and has Nehemiah and Ezra coming before her during the fake rule of Xerxes. Now, of course, it's conveniently flipped, with Esther married to Xerxes and Ezra and Nehemiah correctly dated during the rule of Artaxerxes. But once you combine Xerxes and Artaxerxes, there's no place for Esther, unless you combine her with Nehemiah and Nehemiah becomes Mordecai. Keeping Esther "historical" might be one incentive for not exposing the revisions. But truly, carry on as you will and believe anything and investigate nothing. Selective blindness (see no evil) works great as long as you keep your eyes tightly closed.
In Matthew, it had already began to dawn. In John, it was still dark. Mary made a couple trips back and forth. There’s no big mystery or contradiction there.
May the blessings of Messiah Christ from the Holy Shroud (Turin) that was set and cast aside from His Resurrection multiply and abound in you and in the world forever
This is very interesting and reminds me of something about the Christian bible which I’ve thought since I was young ... what if you made a bible which consists only of Jesus’ words and their context? Could you imagine there ever being a Book of Jesus in Tanach, if it were parsed properly?
Paula Wallace well, he called himself the equivalent of the Greek Word “huios“ of God (son or apostle), but in his own words he never claimed to be God
Paula Wallace there’s a flurry of things to unpack which would require much time, but I’ll summarize by saying that much distortion was done while translating into English (through the lens of Nicene Creed bound scribes) .. he said things like “I am in the Father and the Father is in me”... but also “I go to my God and your God”... “I can do nothing on my own, but only by the Father who sent me”
Paula Wallace I can retranslate one or two verses, but it’s quite a time consuming task, so I’d prefer not to do more than that. If you point to one or two verses in question, I’ll analyze the Greek and offer an alternative translation
There is NO contradiction between the teaching of resurrection in the Hebrew scriptures or resurrection in the Christian Greek scriptures. First, here is what the condition of the dead is according to the Hebrew scriptures: Ecclesiastes 9:4-6, 10 "4 There is hope for whoever is among the living, because a live dog is better off than a dead lion. 5 For the living know that they will die, but the dead know nothing at all, nor do they have any more reward, because all memory of them is forgotten. 6 Also, their love and their hate and their jealousy have already perished, and they no longer have any share in what is done under the sun. 10 Whatever your hand finds to do, do with all your might, for there is no work nor planning nor knowledge nor wisdom in the Grave, where you are going." In other words, you will never see anything in a dead person other than exactly what it says here....when you are dead, you are dead...PERIOD! So what hope is there for the dead as the bible teaches? Well, consider the following from both the Hebrew scriptures and the Christian Greek scriptures: Job 14:13-15 "O that in the Grave you would conceal me, That you would hide me until your anger passes by, That you would set a time limit for me and remember me! 14 If a man dies, can he live again? I will wait all the days of my compulsory service Until my relief comes. 15 You will call, and I will answer you. You will long for the work of your hands." Job believed that God would resurrect him back from the grave....that he would "set a time limit for me" and "remember me". His final statement was that God LONGS to resurrect people...."You will long for the work of your hands". There are several occurrences of resurrection from the grave in the bible, both in the Hebrew scriptures and also in the Christian Greek scriptures: Resurrections were performed by or through the prophets Elijah and Elisha. (1Ki 17:17-24; 2Ki 4:32-37; 13:20, 21) Resurrections were also performed in the Christian Greek scriptures...three by Jesus (Lazarus, Jairus' daughter and the son of the widow of Nain). Two resurrections were also performed by God directly, one in the Hebrew scriptures with the man whose corpse touched Elisha’s bones and one in the Christian Greek scriptures when God resurrected Jesus from the grave. In the Hebrew scriptures, it tells us that the Messiah will be responsible for resurrecting the dead from the grave (those asleep in the dust): Dan.12:1, 2 "“During that time Miʹcha·el will stand up, the great prince who is standing in behalf of your people. And there will occur a time of distress such as has not occurred since there came to be a nation until that time. And during that time your people will escape, everyone who is found written down in the book. 2 And many of those asleep in the dust of the earth will wake up, some to everlasting life and others to reproach and to everlasting contempt." In the Christian Greek scriptures it ALSO tells us that the Messiah will be responsible for resurrecting the dead from the grave in John chapter 5 and 1Thessalonians chapter 4: John 5:25, 28, 29 " “Most truly I say to you, the hour is coming, and it is now, when the dead will hear the voice of the Son of God, and those who have paid attention will live. 28 Do not be amazed at this, for the hour is coming in which all those in the memorial tombs will hear his voice 29 and come out, those who did good things to a resurrection of life, and those who practiced vile things to a resurrection of judgment." 1Thessalonians 4: 16 " because the Lord himself will descend from heaven with a commanding call, with an archangel’s voice and with God’s trumpet, and those who are dead in union with Christ will rise first." The "great prince", Michael, as spoken of in Daniel 12:1 is the great princely Son of God, the angel of Jehovah. The "archangel" spoken of at 1Thessalonians 4:16 is the angel of Jehovah, the archangel Michael. (arche...chief or main....and angelos....angel) What will be the end result after the resurrection of the dead in the paradise earth under the rulership of God's Son?: According to the Hebrew scriptures: Isaiah 25:8 " He will swallow up death forever, And the Sovereign Lord Jehovah will wipe away the tears from all faces. The reproach of his people he will take away from all the earth, For Jehovah himself has spoken it." According to the Christian Greek scriptures: Revelation 21:3, 4 " With that I heard a loud voice from the throne say: “Look! The tent of God is with mankind, and he will reside with them, and they will be his people. And God himself will be with them. 4 And he will wipe out every tear from their eyes, and death will be no more, neither will mourning nor outcry nor pain be anymore. The former things have passed away.” There is absolutely no difference in what the Hebrew scriptures or the Christian Greek scriptures teach about God's kingdom. Nor is there any difference in what they teach about the hope of the resurrection of the dead from the grave. Jesus Christ was a Jew and he taught about his God and Father's kingdom as a Jew!
All four gospels are in complete agreement: He is not here! He has risen! Indeed, God did not abandon him to the grave or let his holy one see decay. (Psalm 110) This is none other than David's son and David's Lord, even Jesus the lamb who was slain for the sins of the world. Stop doubting and believe!
Thanks for your video. BTW, there were three different Mary Magdalenes, all relatives of Jesus who come to the tomb three different times under three different circumstances. First MM comes while still dark, alone, sees Jesus in the garden. Then a second MM comes with another Mary to watch the tomb. They bring no spices. They see the angels and rush away, bumping into Jesus along the way. They grab him and kiss him, so they are clearly relatives, which also explains why they are coming to the tomb, they know him personally, and he knows them. The third MM who is a member of the household of Jesus' mother, comes to the tomb with the family bringing spices. They don't arrive until just after sunrise. Three distinctly different times and three distinctly different circumstances. But cultural bias prefers to ignore the obvious and claim the gospels contradict the account. So scholarly incompetence again gives the Bible a bad name. Someone Jewish, for instance, knows Passover is ALWAYS eaten on the 15th, when you change the date at sundown. When the Israelites first left Egypt though, they changed the date at midnight like the Egytians, so while they left Egypt after midnight on the 15th, Passover is said to take place on the 14th, but that is because Passover ends specifically at midnight when the angel of death comes. Jesus could not have died the same day he ate Passover. He died the next day of preparation that week in Nisan 20th, a Thursday, so that is where the "three nights" come in. I corrected you on the three MMs, so why can't you point out to Christians Passover is ALWAYS eaten on a high Sabbath day, the first day of unleavened bread? Two issues are very crrectable; why don't you jump on this and correct them? Thanks again.
Look back at what you just posted "There are three different Mary Magdalenes." Where does it say this in the Christian Bible? Is that what you have to do to get these contradictory accounts to agree? Seems a little sketchy. (OK, a LOT sketchy.)
@@curtisscissons563 Once you realize these are relatives of Jesus from the same family and location, it's not so sketchy. But it's your choice; three different stories, three different women, or just one woman and a lot of confusion.
@Paula Wallace No there aren't three Marys. This is just an excuse to get around the contradictions in the Christian Gospels. No where does it even hint there are three different Marys
Charlie Smit, so if Jesus died on the day after Passover (the next day, as you maintain), then why does John 18:28 say: "When Jesus was arrested, the Jews did not enter Pilate's judgment hall, BECAUSE THEY WANTED TO STAY CLEAN TO EAT THE PASSOVER. " This means that they had not eaten the Passover before his arrest. The day of the Passover had not yet arrived. In John's Gospel, Jesus is crucified on the day of Preparation, which is the day before Passover. So, he is slaughtered like a Passover lamb on the day before Passover. But the other Gospels contradict this, having Jesus slain AFTER he has eaten Passover with the apostles. The conflicting day of the crucifixion is possibly the greatest contradiction between the Gospel stories.
Rabbi, no I went through the texts. The confusion comes from interpreting Mary. There were a group of women with 2 Mary's and another different Mary(the one with the 7 devils). She got to the grave after the group. She was the first one to see Jesus. I have a very solid explanation for the facts. The first Mary to see Jesus, was nowhere refenced to the same Mary as the earlier event where at least one of the two Marys is the mother of James. I have encountered many situations in my life where I met, let's say 3 Isaacs at the same event and one Isaac pitched up a bit later when the first 2 Isaacs have left already The second Isaac may witness different as well as similar events. There is even explicit prove that a specific Mary was different from another Mary. The issue is also that all information is not always captured by eyewitness reports, but mostly those established as fact by the witness. I can imagine with so many Marys it will require four gospels to integratecthe facts. For example, the gospel of Mark speaks of an earlier event where it is clear that the angel(s) told the earlier Mary(s) about Jesus that rose from the tomb. Mary(the one with the 7 devils) is a later event and she was not yet informed by the angel. And then as she turned back, she saw Jesus. He told her not to touch Him, since He had not been to The Father yet. He must have spiritually assended and descended in man's earthly time and then later meet Thomas and other disciples who physically touched Him, since He already met with The Father. There are many events that took place, but they can be explained and time synchronised. I am very happy with the explanation(s). It is very real life, not one dimensional and without the true spirit of how things happen in real life.
Thank you, I agree and would also like to add that who said what, first , defeats the broader picture that the stated resurrection did occur. The rabbi is splitting hairs - like who told the grandparents about a new baby in the family...the son, daughter - in law , a friend...when they were all seated on the same table.
Rabbi Tovia after doing my own examination of Matthew 28 and John 20 I have come to realize that both tell the same story and not two different stories as you suppose. The main point of the story is about Mary Magdalene coming to the empty tomb and she encounters the risen Lord Jesus and then giving the disciples the good news that he had risen back to life The rest are just details that are not that important. So no contradictions. Nevertheless your video was very interesting so thanks for this one it opened up my eyes to see something I didn’t notice before!
There is no colossal contradiction. It will finally be discovered that the gospel of Matthew was assembled after the others. The gospel of John is the most Christological of them all. I will cease and desist from aligning Christ with the Jewish scriptures, and referring to Him as the Messiah (a Jewish narrative.) Even though Jesus was a Jew, John the Baptist, Yeshua, Saul and His 12 Disciples was formed from the Christ being to minister to mankind. Whether or not people choose to accept them and their mission is completely dependent upon one's current level of intelligence and free will. To GOD be the glory!
"The lady doth protest too much, methinks" (Shakespeare) I don’t believe in the Easter Bunny, but I don’t make it my life’s campaign to destroy any belief in that bunny. However, the Rabbi’s dishonest rant goes well beyond that of somebody simply not believing that Jesus is the Jewish Messiah. Why? To an observer who understands the hundreds of passages in the Tanakh, that point towards the coming Messiah, and how Jesus, and only Jesus, fulfilled them; and understands the history of the destruction of the Temple, the Levitical Order, and therefore the impossibility of any continuing sacrifices of atonement; it is obvious that Jesus is the Lamb of God prophesied by Abraham, and is the Messiah of Israel. The Rabbi presents himself as an expert on the Tanakh, and the New Testament, so why can’t he see this; and why would he lie that the life of Jesus doesn’t fulfill the teaching of the Tanakh, when it is obvious that it does. There has to be more to it then what is rational. It isn’t that Jesus doesn’t fit the teachings of the Tanakh, but it is that Jesus doesn’t fit the desires of the Rabbinic Jews, the followers of the Pharisees. They didn’t want the Lamb of God sacrificed for the sin of many, but a conquering messiah, who will subjugate their enemies and bring them political power. This was clearly demonstrated in the third Jewish rebellion; when Bar Kokhba, a violent rebel leader, who they thought would overthrow the Romans, and give them freedom; was declared to be the Messiah by the Rabbis. Well that didn’t end well and led to the total dispersal of Jews out of Palestine and the final split between the Yeshua Mashiach believing Jews, and the Rabbinic Jews. It is still the same today. The Rabbis don’t want their Messiah, who is the Lamb of God, as promised in the Tanakh, who brings billions of goy into a direct worshipful relationship with the Lord God of Israel; but they want a military messiah who will subdue their enemies, and make them the preeminent nation, and all people on Earth will have to worship their God, through them.
There are no instances in the Renewed Covenant Writings that contradict the Torah or Tanach. If there is a small error then the latter corrects the former.
This was my q! Thank you Rabbi! You answered exactly the question I asked. I had heard somebody else "nitpick" the Greek books and I asked a nitpicky question. Perfect answer!
They should just rename the religion paulinity because apparently he over rules Jesus and G-d
Paulism.
_The scripture was rewrite alter and recreate by early church fathers in greek empire for the beneficiary of constantine political power and church wealth_
myazleoful well said, agree 100% with you.
Thank you very much, Rabbi Tovah singer, through your teaching I truly understand how Christian be came.
Rabbi Singer is brilliant.
I learn so much about other religions (I am practicing muslim) and Rabbi Tovia Singer is so intelligent and spreads great knowledge for us laymen. Thank you for the work you do. May God Bless you!!!
He should tell us too,that the ORIGINAL Torah does not exist any longer. What they have is what they ,the D- school wrote some 800 years after Moses , and what they thought Moses brought to them...in other words the 5 books of Moses was not written by him....
@@Spear-to7cv clearly you haven't read any Torah if you think they're mistakes 😂
@@Yoshi-gg2pm you should stop babbling,and prove me otherwise,otherwise go and creep into your hole and sing halleluya....😂😂😂😂😂
Can you prove your case in a any way@@Spear-to7cv?
What the Christians did is aPAULing
pun intended
I like what you did there!
Tovia...Ok I totally Agree with all this.. So What is the Hebrew stand point or Your View point on the New Testament if it’s so full of lies... do you discard the whole thing? It sure makes me want too !! IAm Not Jewish!! I Highly Respect Your People and Culture Tho and Am a Recovering CHRISTIAN I am a Believer of Truth and Facts tho And Love your Show and your Work!! May HaShem Bless you and Keep you Brother :)
@@christophermarlowe2356 You worship a human being.
@@urielzahriel-official-4942 yeah, and we can discard the book of mormon and the Quran too. These books are no more true than Harry Potter.
@whatthe The foundation that Christianity stands upon is when your mom catches you in a lie and you keep changing your story to keep the lie going.
The mother knows the child is lying, but the child won't give up.
The narrative keeps going until it's so contrived that anyone with a minimal amount of intelligence can see through the holes, yet emotionally they won't let go ....
The people that wrote the four gospels were not physically at the trial, the crucifixion or the resurrection yet they write in great detail about what was said and done. The contradictions are an effect of the four persons writing hearsay. If this is the basis of Christianity, it's amazing that it's lasted so long. It's time for Humanity to update from religion to spirituality.
Only reason it lasted as long as it did is because it had the most powerful country on earth enforcing it at sword point for the next couple centuries. Once Rome collapsed we start seeing fragmentation that continues to this day.
By the call of heresy, don't you render all history writings void...because the writers weren't there. Moses wrote of Adam, creation and the flood...shall we discount the Torah because Moses wasn't in attendance. Really? Sometimes in the light of retrospect objectivity illuminates the darkness. I agree wholeheartedly to move from organised religion to a one to one relationship with the creator like Moses had, with the alpha and the omega, the I Am that I Am, the friend of Abraham, the one who sits in judgement between the cherubs in the Holy of Holies.
A more important question.... where was Jesus from age 12 to 30? There's no mention of it anywhere. So God is walking around on earth and nobody knows it? No scribes following him recording his every move? Especially given the hoopla surrounding his birth. After he reaches age 12 the whole middle east suddenly gets amnesia. Then when he finally does show up... no one asks him where the hell he's been for 18 years? Screwy.
John, the bapist, knew who Jesus was. So we don't know what was going on precisely. He was respected from age 12 in the temple, so he was very active and apparently had some idea of who he was.
@@charliesmith3777 Even in the temple people should have remembered who this kid was! Are u kidding. This is god... and people are just walking around surprised by his knowledge. ..and that's it? People should be screaming "look... there's god over there"! How can there be such fanfare regarding the his birth... and then people just cavalierly ignore him until he's 30?! Are u kidding. Especially. Since people were all. Gossiping.... there's no way this kid could go undetected for 18 years!
@@jeffreystern5886our Israelite Ancestors helped them in the middle 700 AD time period and they learned our ways when they converted.
The Spanish Speaking Arabs had their hooks in us going back ages. Spanish Speaking Arabs was the real faces of the Israelite Slave Trade with the help of the Caucasians and Hamite Africans. As you study it was all part of prophecy. .
@Jeffery Stern. I can't count the times I've been called a "fake Jew" by people in this chat, and in other media in the over 40 years I've been doing this. It's usually "We have the new Covenant, so we are the new Jews, not you." Good thing these people don't get to say who's Jewish, and who isn't.
@@mikehood3424 Funny. ..as far back as I remember. . Nobody wanted anything to w the jews.
My problem is where was Mary planning on taking JC? a woman on her own came to carry a dead body to take it where exactly?
People forgetting a very important point. Greeks wrote the NT, YES, Greeks who created theatre , drama, literature, music, science, art, Olympics.... and they did a very good job. We are all till today benefiting from their contributions.
However the religion that they have created sucks. It was made by adding the beautiful mythology to the Jewish ideas , the result is a religion that does not make cense , and full of contradictions. On the other hand our super orthodox turned Judaism into a superstition, cult like movement, the black hat People who are so concerned with the procedures they forgot about the people.
This was great thank you
So fascinating, I watched this video two times in a row.
Good info and perspective . Thank you rabbi singer.
Love the song at the end Adon Olam [Eternal Lord/Sovereign of the Universe]
One apologist explained it this way: Mary saw the tomb, and left for Peter's while the other women received the angel's message then ran to to tell the other disciples who were at a different place. Meanwhile, Mary and Peter come to the empty tomb, Peter leaves, she has her Jesus encounter, while the other women have theirs.
MY QUESTION IS: In John's version he tells her not to touch him, but in Matthew they clasp his feet and worship him. So did they mess his mojo up by touching him?
Thank you for being a light to the Nation. Wish I can go to live in Yisreal
My dear rabbi, Shalom.
Tanakh is the word of God surely , he is the holy one. Blessed be he.
✍️Actually I find two more contradicts, personly I think I m not understanding it so you may help us in that matter of Tanakh.
👉1st-Age difference of king Ahaziah
A) 2-kings 8:26 ( Ahaziah is 22 years old at the time of kingship)
B) 2-Chronicales 22:2( Ahaziah is 42 years old at the time of kingship)
👉2nd difference in amount and stuff of money
A) 2-Samuel 24:24( David gave 50 silver shekel to Araunah)
B) 1-chronicle 21:25( David gave six hundred gold shekels)
Waiting for you guidance may God Israel bless you with his eternal wisdom that you may be used to bring back lost ones. 🙏
22. Ezra 2:64 and Nehemiah 7:66 agree that the total number of the whole assembly was 42,360. Yet the numbers do not add up to anything close. The totals obtained from each book is as follows:
29,818 (Ezra)
31,089 (Nehemiah)
Mark was added upon on the theme of resurrection, it only means that at the time the writings about the resurrection were not sufficient to prove beyond doubt the event actually took place. It only points out, it never happened.
@Paula Wallace I couldn't agree with you more.
@ Paula Wallace & @Kypros Christodoulides Me too. It is a complete waste of time. What's more is that it is so damaging to a person's spiritual life. I am speaking from my own personal experience. The NT leads a person into worshiping a man instead of God. I'm so glad to now know it is a pagan fairytale and a waste of time, but it's hard to turn off this conditioning. I grew up "pentecostal xtian". I try to pray and it takes a great effort to keep "in je***' name" out of my prayers because I was taught prayers aren't effective without that name. I'm just SO GLAD to not be a part of that nonsense anymore and to know better than to teach it to my sons.
when that black man returns, you will have ample opportunity to tell him to his face you called him and his father liars.
@Mike Hood When that black man returns, I'm going to tell him he still owes me $20.00
@@curtisscissons563Revelation 19:13 - And he was clothed with a vesture dipped in blood: and his name is called The Word of Yahua.
Hello Sir love your teaching, got a question in the resurrection story what happened to the people who buried Jesus why is there no written story's from them? Did they removed it from the bible.Humm.
My head canon that explains the empty tomb is that officials from the Sanhedrin and their assistants took the body from Joseph of Arimathea's tomb and laid it in the tomb of the Court.
I am so blessed by Rabbi Tovia Singer.
25. Did Joshua and the Israelites capture Jerusalem?
Yes (Joshua 10:23, 40)
No (Joshua 15:63)
john bosh you should send me all these
𐤀𐤆𐤓𐤏𐤄
Did he ever send you anything?
You are not understanding the verse at all. They did conquer Jerusalem, the Jebusites (which were not part of the Jebusite nation but part of the Tower of David which was in Jerusalem, called Jebus) dwelled WITH the Children of Judah in Jerusalem to this very day which enhances the validity of Torah
@@MicMan03 google skeptics annotated bible
does it matter ???
thank you rabbi for the world the truth, this is the begining of the unmasking this false religion.
@@chm5750
"Teaches love, forgiveness, and responsibility for your own deeds-"
**looks at the constant genocide, war, and slavery in Russia, and the Eastern Roman Empire**
So loving.
May HaShem continue to bless you Rabbi ‘ ✡️✡️✡️✡️🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱❤️
When the rabbi tears your religion apart,its OK,but let a Muslim person do that,than the 1st thing you hypocrites do, is to attack the prophet of Islam, hypocrissy at its best...
Good work
1. Who incited David to count the fighting men of Israel?
God did (2 Samuel 24: 1)
Satan did (I Chronicles 2 1:1)
Which of the hundreds of versions of Christian bibles are you finding this discrepancy?
in Hebrew "Satan" just means the adversary. Satan isnt a person. Its just the personification of evil or the adversary, not an actual being. Why would god listen to satan lmao? I think what the text is saying is that looking at the advisory and seeing their numbers incited david to count his own men. It could be both not either/or
Satan is not an independent person, its a metaphor for our own evil thoughts or inner man.
john bosh
Incitement to choose good or evil is built into the human being. It’s called free choice. Your question “who incited David to count the fighting men of Israel” is an inherently flawed one.
9. When did David bring the Ark of the Covenant to Jerusalem? Before defeating the Philistines or after?
After (2 Samuel 5 and 6)
Before (I Chronicles 13 and 14)
Both.
The Israelites and the Philistines were constantly at war with each other until they were both crushed by Assyria and Babylon, and the Phillistines either died out or fled to become Carthage, and the Israelites were expelled for decades and the first temple was destroyed. It's hardly unimaginable that bringing the Ark to Jerusalem happened between two wars.
Mr Singer, how would you be if at the end of the times, your mission to fight Christian doctrine, Jesus-Christ, and true christians is found wrong and vain ?
After studying the NT for over twenty years and praying to Jesus as the Mighty God I have come to a controversial conclusion....The NT is also the Word of God and Jesus Christ is still the way, the truth, and the life! Biblical Christianity is not about following a Law or set of rules but it's about a relationship with a Living God who purchased my redemption with His own blood and has given me eternal life! Praise YHWH who has become my Salvation=JESUS!
Donai, the Law has not changed. Yes - we are saved by God's grace, but because God is sovereign over all, we still need to obey his laws.
Here's 2 Scripture verses, "Not everyone who says unto me (i.e. Jesus), Lord, Lord (i.e. recognizes the sovereignty of Jesus) shall enter into the kingdom of Heaven, but he that does the will of my Father which is in Heaven (i.e. obeys God's commandments/Torah). Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord (i.e. I recognize you, Jesus, as God) have we not prophesied in your name? and in your name have cast out devils? and in your name done many wonderful works? And then will I (Jesus) profess unto them, "I never knew you: Depart from me you who work iniquity (i.e. Lawlessness)." Matthew 7:21-23
Jesus is the Way - as you say. He kept the Law of God.
@Deals Durban Yes - he criticized them for putting traditions before God's commandments. Matthew 23:2 is another good one. Here, Jesus tells his followers to do everything that the scribes and Pharisees say when they sit in 'Moses's seat' (i.e. when they can only read from the Torah). :)
@@christophermarlowe2356 Hi DSS. I honestly don't think the rules / commandments from the Torah have been done away with. Of course, the priests can't fulfil many of them without the Temple - and I think some - like stoning your children if they curse their parents - really shouldn't be carried out. But - the essence of what's right and wrong remains. What I don't like in the modern church is they often call it 'legalism' if we try to do what God wants. In other words God has to keep doing for us and we return by … what?... singing? That's what most churches seem to think is our job! (Heck - I'd rather listen to his birds.)
@@christophermarlowe2356 Hi DSS. Thanks for always talking to me. I do value your cheery friendship.
Re: Two Gods. It’s the same God. It’s just that the corruption of the NT translation makes many think that now it’s “Follow your heart” or “Do as thou wilt”, rather than “God rules”. I think this misunderstanding is sad.
BTW - On reflection, I don’t think there’s a rule to stone children for cursing parents. I don’t know how that idea came into my head. I think they have to murder their parents first.
@@christophermarlowe2356 Hi DSS. I’m not sure of the whole Trinity thing.
The Shema clearly states that God is one.
Now- in the Tenakh there is a Spirit of God that creates (e.g. Genesis 1:2) and we know that the Spirit of God is able to indwell a man e.g. Genesis 41:38, and that God’s Spirit can endow certain gifts in men e.g. Exodus 28:3. We also know that during the times of the Tenakh God occasionally presented himself in the form of a human. E.g. Samson’s Dad, Manoah, said, “We shall surely die because we have seen Elohim”. (Judges 14:32). When God did this (pre-Yeshua) he was often called the Angel of Adonai or the Captain of the Hosts.
Now, in the NT, we are told that disciples are to be baptized in the name of the Father, son and Holy Spirit (Matthe 28:19). Does this ‘father’ and ‘son’ refer to a father-God and a son-God or ‘father of Israel’ (i.e. YHWH) and the son of Israel who is the obedient servant?
Also - we know that when Yeshua left he said “unless I go away the Comforter (i.e. the Holy Spirit) will not come to you” (John 16:7) - which makes me think they are the same (a bit like Clark Kent and Superman but better :) ); but then, in the Millennium, the Messiah (I claim it’s Yeshua) will reign on David’s throne while YHWH’s Spirit fills Ezekiel’s Temple - so they seem to be different.
The popular opinion of the Messianic group that I’m in (whom I love dearly) claim that God needs to be a group to be the origin of companionship love. Otherwise, from where do we get this type of love?
My personal opinion is “I’m not sure”. I know God is a Spirit and that he can appear in human form to help us, and I'm sure that Yeshua was an example of this.
(Conclusion - I’d hate to ever have to debate the concept of a Trinity.)
Re: the 11th Commandment. My Aunt used to tell the joke of Moses coming down from Mt. Sinai, carrying 3 tablets of stone.
"I've brought you 15 Commandments from God!" he proudly called to Israel.
Moses walked a few more steps, tripped and fell, and in so doing, broke one of the tablets.
Upon composing himself he called out, "I've brought you 10 Commandments from God." :)
95. Who killed Saul?
Saul took his own sword and fell upon it.... Thus Saul died... (I Samuel 31:4-6)
An Amalekite slew him (2 Samuel 1:1- 16)
Amalekite led Saul to suicide
pretty sure this guy did it
One point to clarify. "How many days in the tomb?" You say 3D & 2N. But Mt 21:8, Mk 16:2 & Lk 24:1 say only 'on the first day of the [lunar] week. Same for Jn 20:1 but you say 2D & 2N. How did you get the duration out of one single expression? You need the starting and the ending points - into the tomb (Abib 14 evening) until the tomb found empty (Abib 16 dawn) = 1N + 1D + 1N (2 nights + 1 day).
He was just making a point, not a statement.
@@joshuarivera2422 BTW, the text in G-Mt is in the setting of the early ministry, not in the Passion week. The expression 'will be for 3D and 3N in the heart of the earth' alludes to his 3 year-period ministry in Jerusalem as the heart of the earth. It has noting to do with how long he is going to remain dead buried in a grave.
Hi Tovia Singer, I am a born again King James bible believing Christian. I have a question for you, why did you guys change the procedure of circumcision and not do it the way the bible says to?
How have we changed the procedure? Anyway where is the procedure specified in the Scriptures?
Well a chunk of flint is a bit more complicated and unwieldy than a scalpel. Pretty sure G-d doesn't care what tool is used as long as it gets done.
BEAUTIFUL!!!
You really nailed it! Wow!
This is logical
Tovia Singe, despite his intellect, does not comprehend well the passion narrative, but is convinced of himself he does. This is compounded by the troubles evident in the English translations of the gospels that demonstrate a deliberate, agenda driven obscuring of the chronological facts. He should use his prodigious mind in serious apologetic discourse rather that in an attempt at taking potshots at what he does not comprehend spiritually.
@Yerachmiel HaLevi none so blind as those who refuse to see, yet believe they have sight. go read Isaiah 42 and realize the Ivarim are the Ivri.
@Yerachmiel HaLevi you commit a sin of presumption, in arrogance and should withhold your tongue. I honor the Elohim of Israel, even haQadosh and He sent His servant Yeshua haMashiah according to the Word He gave to His servant Moshe (Deut 18:15-19) rabbeinu ,whom your fathers (and you) have rejected. And the spirit upon him, and the word in his mouth, was that of Avinu Malcheinu, and in your hatred for His spirit, it has led you to call for the crucifixion of haNavi hazot, indicating your hatred for the Father as well; PATRICIDE, EVEN AS IT IS TO THIS DAY..
@Yerachmiel HaLevi You are not even in the same conversation as you argue things irrelevant. Yeshua is the Prophet Moshe wrote, as he was told by haShem, about who was to come, to which Malachi attested. Nothing in Scripture about 'trinity' (your imagination) but there is a Father (whom you deny), a begotten son (whom you are blinded to) and a ru'ach Elohim (whom you, and others like you, continuously provoke). None deny Messiah's humanity, except those who do yimach sh'mo vezichro, as though they can eliminate one who actually exists. Your rejction of That Prophet is held against you, and you will pay the severe price of so doing. As you go through the readings pertaining to the seven sabbaths of consolation, consider why the portion of Isaiah that was SUPPRESSED (Is. 53 and 61) and how prominently they are recorded in the brit chadashah. Deut 18:19 directly relates to Isaiah 53 and many other attesting passages (like Ps, 22) that you have FORSAKEN for your lying traditions that REFUSE to acknowledge the TRUTH of all scripture. The hatred in your heart for the brethren is why the beit miqdash was twice destroyed in history. And your continued sinat chinam will do the same with the NEXT temple.
@Yerachmiel HaLevi Damn yourselves to Hell if you so choose, if you curse YHV'H' son, you will be held accountable
@Yerachmiel HaLevi the more you write the stupider it gets. Have you never read, Adam haben haElohim? or how the b'nei haElohim rebelled in Bereshit 6? and how about אספרה אל חק יהוה אמר אלי בני אתה אני היום ילדתיך׃
I think cheiatianity has many contradictions but whst religion doesnt ? I think the big divider that needs to be seriously resolved is the divinity of jesus. This part comes later.
This may sound strange, but I am enjoying these videos and I am curious as a watch nerd, what you are sporting on your wrist?
Rabbi Tovia; likes to create videos and then watches as the children play in the sandbox.
Great teaching, These stories are written by people who precive what God and religion to be. Someone wrote no one has ever seen God or heard the voice,some say they did, that is what they wrote , not all people believe those stories those who do will always have issues and not agree with them . If this God what ever that is wanted you to know ,it would already be inside of you, not in a book written by man .
Jeremiah 31: 33-35.🤔
Can I get this chart of cotragdiction, please.?!
Screenshot
Chimeras can't be Jewish.
Rabbi, I would love to meet and discuss the Scriptures in person. Although we do not yet agree about Messiah, I do respect you and pray for God to make his truth known. You would be interested to know that one of the tribal groups in Liberia may have roots tracing back to the tribe of Dan.
How about accepting that you’re wrong
Matthew 12:30-32
He who is not with me is against me and he who does not gather with me scatters. And so I tell you, every sin and blasphemy will be forgiven men, but the blasphemy against the Spirit will not be forgiven. Anyone who speaks a word against the Son of Man will be forgiven. But anyone who speaks against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven, either in this age or in the age to come.
John 4:24
God ( Jehovah ) is Spirit.....
Zechariah 4:6
so he said to me, this is the word of the Lord to Zerubbabel. Not by might nor by power, but by my Spirit, says the Lord Almighty.
Ruach-Ha-qodesh
( The Holy Spirit, Spirit of YHWH ).
You mean against Casper the Holy Ghost? So if I say "I think all the works of the Holy Spirit are actually works of Satan", I'm doomed? well then, "I think all the works of the Holy Spirit are actually works of Satan." Now what?
John 1:32
Then John gave this testimony: I saw the Spirit come down from heaven as a dove and remain on him.
John 4:24
God ( Jehovah ) is Spirit...
Ruach-Ha-qodesh
( The Holy Spirit, Spirit of YHWH )
So you believe all the works of God ( YHWH ) are from satan?
Matthew 12:36-37
But I tell you that men will have to give account on the day of judgment for every careless word they have spoken. For by your words you will be acquitted and by your words you will be condemned.
@WORSHIP JEHOVAH The only thing the book of Matthew is good for is to wrap rotten fish in.
WORSHIP JEHOVAH - Hello sir! I trust you're living in the peace and love of God! With reference to Matthew 12:30-32, how can Yeshua say such a thing? Who talks like this? Answer: NO ONE!
John 7:46
"46 The officers answered, “No one ever spoke like this man!”
So what is your point?
ROMANS 11v 7 What then? Israel hath not obtained that which he seeketh for; but the election hath obtained it, and the rest were blinded.8 (According as it is written, God hath given them the spirit of slumber, eyes that they should not see, and ears that they should not hear;) unto this day.
@R G Quoting Romans to Jews? What good will that do? Romans is part of that anti-Semitic sack of garbage called the "Christian Bible". it's nothing but lies, and it's fruits are death and the loss of your soul. Stop polluting this chat with such poisonous nonsense.
Glad that I rejected Christianity
1 Corinthians 15:1 Moreover, brethren, I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye have received, and wherein ye stand;
2 By which also ye are saved, if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless ye have believed in vain.
3 For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures;
4 And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures:
5 And that he was seen of Cephas, then of the twelve:
6 After that, he was seen of above five hundred brethren at once; of whom the greater part remain unto this present, but some are fallen asleep.
7 After that, he was seen of James; then of all the apostles.
8 And last of all he was seen of me also, as of one born out of due time.
9 For I am the least of the apostles, that am not meet to be called an apostle, because I persecuted the church of God.
10 But by the grace of God I am what I am: and his grace which was bestowed upon me was not in vain; but I laboured more abundantly than they all: yet not I, but the grace of God which was with me.
11 Therefore whether it were I or they, so we preach, and so ye believed.
12 Now if Christ be preached that he rose from the dead, how say some among you that there is no resurrection of the dead?
13 But if there be no resurrection of the dead, then is Christ not risen:
14 And if Christ be not risen, then is our preaching vain, and your faith is also vain.
15 Yea, and we are found false witnesses of God; because we have testified of God that he raised up Christ: whom he raised not up, if so be that the dead rise not.
16 For if the dead rise not, then is not Christ raised:
17 And if Christ be not raised, your faith is vain; ye are yet in your sins.
18 Then they also which are fallen asleep in Christ are perished.
19 If in this life only we have hope in Christ, we are of all men most miserable.
20 But now is Christ risen from the dead, and become the firstfruits of them that slept.
21 For since by man came death, by man came also the resurrection of the dead.
22 For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive.
23 But every man in his own order: Christ the firstfruits; afterward they that are Christ’s at his coming.
24 Then cometh the end, when he shall have delivered up the kingdom to God, even the Father; when he shall have put down all rule and all authority and power.
25 For he must reign, till he hath put all enemies under his feet.
26 The last enemy that shall be destroyed is death.
27 For he hath put all things under his feet. But when he saith all things are put under him, it is manifest that he is excepted, which did put all things under him.
28 And when all things shall be subdued unto him, then shall the Son also himself be subject unto him that put all things under him, that God may be all in all.
29 Else what shall they do which are baptized for the dead, if the dead rise not at all? why are they then baptized for the dead?
30 And why stand we in jeopardy every hour?
31 I protest by your rejoicing which I have in Christ Jesus our Lord, I die daily.
32 If after the manner of men I have fought with beasts at Ephesus, what advantageth it me, if the dead rise not? let us eat and drink; for to morrow we die.
33 Be not deceived: evil communications corrupt good manners.
34 Awake to righteousness, and sin not; for some have not the knowledge of God: I speak this to your shame.
35 But some man will say, How are the dead raised up? and with what body do they come?
36 Thou fool, that which thou sowest is not quickened, except it die:
37 And that which thou sowest, thou sowest not that body that shall be, but bare grain, it may chance of wheat, or of some other grain:
38 But God giveth it a body as it hath pleased him, and to every seed his own body.
39 All flesh is not the same flesh: but there is one kind of flesh of men, another flesh of beasts, another of fishes, and another of birds.
40 There are also celestial bodies, and bodies terrestrial: but the glory of the celestial is one, and the glory of the terrestrial is another.
41 There is one glory of the sun, and another glory of the moon, and another glory of the stars: for one star differeth from another star in glory.
42 So also is the resurrection of the dead. It is sown in corruption; it is raised in incorruption:
43 It is sown in dishonour; it is raised in glory: it is sown in weakness; it is raised in power:
44 It is sown a natural body; it is raised a spiritual body. There is a natural body, and there is a spiritual body.
45 And so it is written, The first man Adam was made a living soul; the last Adam was made a quickening spirit.
46 Howbeit that was not first which is spiritual, but that which is natural; and afterward that which is spiritual.
47 The first man is of the earth, earthy: the second man is the Lord from heaven.
48 As is the earthy, such are they also that are earthy: and as is the heavenly, such are they also that are heavenly.
49 And as we have borne the image of the earthy, we shall also bear the image of the heavenly.
50 Now this I say, brethren, that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God; neither doth corruption inherit incorruption.
51 Behold, I shew you a mystery; We shall not all sleep, but we shall all be changed,
52 In a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trump: for the trumpet shall sound, and the dead shall be raised incorruptible, and we shall be changed.
53 For this corruptible must put on incorruption, and this mortal must put on immortality.
54 So when this corruptible shall have put on incorruption, and this mortal shall have put on immortality, then shall be brought to pass the saying that is written, Death is swallowed up in victory.
55 O death, where is thy sting? O grave, where is thy victory?
56 The sting of death is sin; and the strength of sin is the law.
57 But thanks be to God, which giveth us the victory through our Lord Jesus Christ.
58 Therefore, my beloved brethren, be ye stedfast, unmoveable, always abounding in the work of the Lord, forasmuch as ye know that your labour is not in vain in the Lord.
Corinthians. More silly Christian Bible nonsense. And what is the point of those 50 quotes? Quoting a million things won't make Jesus alive again, or make him fulfill any prophecies. He failed everything, he died, he wasn't the messiah. End of story
Curtis very well said.
@Jaeger Meister It's really not that complicated. Remove all the verbiage these apologists engage in here, and it comes down to a VERY simple equation "Did Jesus fulfill the prophecies in the Hebrew Bible? If he did not, he isn't the messiah." That's all there is, nothing further needs to be added or explained. And for the poor souls who continue to claim he DID fulfill prophecy, that isn't true, or I and my whole family would be in Israel right now, worshipping at the Third Temple."
We know 100% God knows the truth! ...you would think after all these years God would tell the leaders of the church whom the Jewish Messiah is. ..since the Jewish have been in worship all these years!? And God knowing they should be claiming the Trinity.?...think about the fact God 100% knows the truth!
Not even those who are circumcised keep the law, yet they want you to be circumcised that they may boast about your circumcision in the flesh. May I never boast except in the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ, through which the world has been crucified to me, and I to the world.
Galatians 6:13-14 NIV
In Paul's Letters-- Paul makes a distinction between God the father and Jesus being designated as Lord.. as in the following Greeting-- " Grace and Peace to you from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ" I often wondered if Paul himself did not think That Jesus is God but only Lord-- Much like when The Pharaoh of Egypt appointed Joseph as Lord of the Land only that He as Pharaoh had authority over Joseph... does anyone have any comment on this?
I do. Don't trust anything Paul says or writes. he is a lying, blaspheming, idolatrous trickster, who's only fruits are the coldness of the grave. believing anything Paul writes or advocates can result in you losing your soul to darkness and destruction. Flee from Paul as from the plague.
In this unity with the Father Jesus, the Son, is the radiance of Gods glory and the exact representation of Gods being and in Him all things hold together. In that context Jesus is all that the Father is (God)
For in Christ all the fullness of the Deity lives in bodily form
but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.
There is a distinction being made that is not captured by orthodox trinity statements
yet for us there is but one God, the Father, "from" whom all things came and for whom we live; and there is but one Lord, Jesus Christ, "through" whom all things came and through whom we live.
Jesus, the head of the body of Christ, -"And this is eternal life, that they may know You, the "only" true God, and Jesus Christ whom You have sent
@Paula Wallace Son or wife?
Irregardless. Gods literal firstborn would be a being not a people and such a being would make such a statement, "Before Abraham was born I AM"
If Jesus said that he lied. G-d said ISRAEL was his firstborn. Which means if Jesus existed at all, he'd have to come into existence after Israel was an entity. And if Jesus did come after Israel, he was no messiah or G-d, because G-d HIMSELF tells us "No G-ds were formed before me, neither were there any AFTER Me." So Jesus could not have come before Israel, and he could not have come AFTER Israel, according to the word of Hashem Himself
@@curtisscissons563 No He didn't lie. He was before Abraham was born. He was before the world began. He was before the angels of God. He was before the creation. He is the firstborn of all creation. In Him the fullness was pleased to dwell. In that unity with the Father He is the radiance of Gods glory and the exact representation of Gods being. Jesus has always been the Son and Gods firstborn is a being not a people. A beginning at some point in history before the world began but no end. The Father is His God. There is a difference in the fullness dwelling in Jesus then Jesus being that fullness. The fullness of the deity that dwells in Jesus is the Father. Another God was not formed.
Jesus-Now this is eternal life: that they know you, the ONLY true God, and Jesus Christ, whom you have sent.
And it was God who appointed Jesus as both Lord and Christ.
So is Jesus God?
He never dies.
Yes, He is all that the Father is.
No, He has always been the Son.
The Son who was, (His spirit) was in the tent of the body that was prepared for Him. And the Spirit of the Father was living in Him.
Jesus-"Father into your hands I commit my spirit"
Gods Christ is forever. And in that though the earth will wear out Gods salvation will endure forever.
You all talk with protestants about the Holy Scripture BUT DO NOT KNOW ABOUT THE CHURCH HOLY TRADITION...
The concept of Messiah is different from Christian's. Jesus said "My kingdom is not wordly" whereas Jews views we're He had to deliver from physical bondage from Romans or Greeks as the case may be. Abraham wished to see the day of Messiah and he had seen. Before Abraham "I AM".
Contradiction? Answer: Four accounts, One Reality !!!
im really about you tovia and all but im just confused because if it was G-d talking to Ezra, then why would the numbers thing not be a big deal. It's supposed to be G-d's word therefore perfect. Is there just something im missing?
It’s an excuse
@@HistoryandReviews Maybe. But I know for a fact anything you have isn’t any better an explanation. It’s either Judaism is wrong or it’s not. Christianity is automatically wrong for trying to base itself on another religion. That’s it’s mistake because now it has the burden of proof. And they’re just not the same religion. Either you’re right. And Judaism is right. Or you’re both wrong. Can’t be that you’re right and he isn’t. Christianity based itself off of Judaism and therefore you by default have to agree with everything in the Tanach. And the fact of the matter is the NT and Tanach are completely different.
@@Denkin_Donuts we’re talking about why he said the Numbers thing “wasnt a big deal”. Thats an excuse on his part.
The bible is imperfect therefore the belief that God wrote it is a lie and crumbles their beliefs
@@HistoryandReviews it’s a logical fallacy to state and try to prove the truth of your religion if you start from the Bible being imperfect. If you admit that your bible is written by man, or any bible, then there is no point to devoting yourself to that religion. No less banking your spiritual existence on it. You cannot simply say “the Bible is imperfect, but it’s still true and if you don’t believe in Christ you surely will be damned to hell.” This is regardless of what you may personally believe. I grew up in a Christian household and we were very loose with what we believed. And it’s because of exactly that. We didn’t take the Bible seriously in the sense that we believed it was written by a man and therefore it gave us the excuse to interpret however which way. That’s what that is. An excuse. It’s an excuse to say “if this particular part doesn’t fit my own personal ideology/belief/morals, then I can simply disregard it because it’s made by man. It’s imperfect so I won’t agree with everything it says.”
That simply is no way to interpret a religion if in fact your religion stresses obedience and/or devotion to one thing or person, then threatens eternal torture if you fail to worship. You get where I’m coming from? Like I can feel you 100%. Skepticism of their side is fine and can be argued. But if you’re right, and Judaism is wrong because it’s bible is imperfect, then Christianity is wrong too. That’s what I’m saying. You’re not arguing FOR Christianity, are you?
@@Denkin_Donuts the bible is fake like all religions.
The whole Tanach speaks about the messiah, who will come and be the savior for Israel and all the nations.
In 5. Mose 18:15 It says "God will raise up a Prophet like Moses and everybody shall listen to him."
In Psalm 2 It says "Kiss the son." Which son ? The answer is in proverbs 30 "Who hath ascended up into heaven, or descended? who hath gathered the wind in his fists? who hath bound the waters in a garment? who hath established all the ends of the earth? what is his name, and what is his son's name, if thou canst tell?" Its about the son of God, who came down on this earth to die for our sins so we can have eternal life with God and set us free from sin to show us how we should live in the torah. Now take a minute for yourself and read Isaiah 53 and ask God in prayer Who is it speaking about ?
Do you have a son ? He will answer your question when you are hungry for the truth. :)
If you mr tovia do not believe jesus is who he says he is you will die in your sins ! Jesus said " before Abraham was , IAM " and may remind you of this truth in john 3:36 " he who believes on the son has everlasting life but he who believes not shall not see life but the wrath of God abides on Him " .
the messiah is not Greek. so stop hellenizing the messiah, thats why a jew gets you wrong
Perhaps the writer of John needed to make women look like dumb and blind cry babies...I mean Jesus could never have appeared to women first and women cannot lead and tell the men that Jesus is Risen...just saying...I have no chip on my shoulder, I'm not a feminist, but along with Pauls views on women, it smacks of more Hellenistic/greek male chauvanism.
Mary Magdalene was in disbelief. How could you accept such a crazy reality right away?
@Deals Durbin In one of the Gospels, Mary meets the resurrected Jesus, and thought he was the GARDENER.
Mental illness is a hell of a thing.
You make a good point. A person in deep mourning after the loss of a loved one goes 3 days after their death to a Tomb only to find the body gone. Shock laden upon shock could have innumerable affects on anyone.
Part 2 of 2 The Khazar Empire
The Khazars emerged on the world scene as Turkic men riding on horses coming out of the Caucasus Mountains and living a nomadic lifestyle. after many centuries the Khazars sought out a more settled way of life. The most interesting aspect about the Khazar warriors history is their adoption of the Israelite (Negro) way which they later over centuries corrupted with many pagan ways and cultures. It is said the Khazarian territory was a major settlement for many Israelite refugees escaping persecution of the gentile nations. The Khazars took on many ways of the Israelite, they even adopted the Hebrew script and Hebrew names that they still use today.
The Greek historian Theophanes wrote that the Khazars were "Turks from the East"
Vladimir Minorsky, wrote that the Khazars were a grouping of local nomadic tribes of southern Russia who were brought together under a new Khazar-Turkic leader.
Khazaria was a Turkic semi-nomadic people. The Khazar Empire, one of the largest polities of medieval Asia (Eurasia), with a capital in Atil and comprising much of modern-day Russia, western Kazakhstan, eastern Ukraine, Azerbaijan, large portions of the Northern Caucasus Mountains (Circassia, Dagestan), parts of Georgia, the Crimea, and Northeastern Turkey. Khazaria was a successor state of the Western Turks. During the 9th and 10th centuries, Khazaria was one of the major arteries of commerce between Northern Europe and the Middle East as well as a connection to the Silk Road. The name "Khazar" is found in numerous languages and seems to be tied to a Turkic verb form meaning "wandering".
urkic people (a.k.a. Khazars) believed that they could trace their descent back to Noah, who had 3 sons Shem,Ham, and Japheth. It is important to understand that all people should be able to trace their people back to the man we know as Noah. Noah and his family were the only ones to survive the world wide flood according to the bible. What is also important to know is what son did the Khazars come from. This research will establish them as true Israelites or just impostors saying they are Israel and are really not at all. Revelation 2:9 I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and [I know] the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews(Israel), and are not, but [are] the synagogue of Satan.
One of the most important Khazar kings, Joseph, wrote in his celebrated reply to Hasdai ibn Shaprut that Khazars were descended from "Kozar," the seventh son of Togarmah's ten sons. From this information alone you can see that this causes a problem of biblical proportions.
If one is to say that they are an Israelite then they would have to be first from the line of Shem. The Khazar king Joseph clearly states that he believed that they were from "Kozar" which, is from Togarmah which, is the son of Japheth and not Shem. Genesis 10-1-3 makes it plain.
Genesis 10:3 The sons of Japheth: Gomer, Magog, Madai, Javan, Tubal, Meshech and Tiras. The sons of Gomer: Ashkenaz, Riphath and Togarmah.
Now according to the book titled, The Jews of Khazaria, the author Kevin Alan Brooks presents a chart of Noah, his sons and their decedents. From this chart titled, Biblical Genealogy of the Turkic Peoples, it shows Kozar (Khazar) being the son of Togarmah which is the son of Gomer who is the son of Japheth.
From this evidence the Khazars are clearly disqualified from being Yah's set apart people nor do they line up with the curses of Deuteronomy chapter 28. Yah's set apart people come from the line of Shem.
JEWS AND JESUS CHRIST.
Isaiah 53 speaks about the Messiah, while Isaiah 59 speaks of Israel. (59:16) so his own arm achieved salvation for him, and his own righteousness sustained him.
(59:20) “The Redeemer will come to Zion, to those in Jacob who repent of their sins,”
My curiosity is when Jews can zealously experiment with TM, Hinduism, Buddhism, Zoroastrianism, and Islam, (which they consider harmless spiritual pursuits) what prevents them to diligently examine your Torah and Tanakh if they reveal Yeheshua (Jesus Christ)?
Why do not you humbly ask the God of your fathers to reveal to you who Jesus Christ is? Yet my perplexity keeps me unsettled when I think about the people of Israel.
How can the OT speak about a spiritual marriage (an intimate spiritual closeness) between “Yahweh Elohim” and His people in the following verses:
Jeremiah 31:32, Isaiah 54:5, Hosea 2:7, Joel 1:8, Jeremiah 2:2, Hosea 2:15, Jeremiah 3:20, Jeremiah 2:32, Hosea 1:2, Hosea 2:2, Isaiah 50:1, Jeremiah 3:12-14, Isaiah 54:6-8, Hosea 2:14, Isaiah 62:4-5, Jeremiah 31:31-33, Ezekiel 16:62, Hosea 2:16.
If God is Spirit and man is a physical being with a spiritual dimension, how can this relationship come to fruition unless he comes to our level of existence? Leviticus 26:12 “I will walk among you.”
Ezek 37:27 “My dwelling place also will be with them; and I will be their God, and they will be My people”
Zechariah 8:8 : I will bring them back and they will live in the midst of Jerusalem; and they shall be My people, and I will be their God in truth and righteousness. I will be the God of all the families of Israel, and they shall be My people.
Jeremiah 31:1. “ These are all in future tense. If these verses are to be true, then God alone should come to the earth to dwell with his people.
Zechariah 2:10 "Sing for joy and be glad, O daughter of Zion; for behold I am coming and I will dwell in your midst," declares the LORD. 11"Many nations will join themselves to the LORD in that day and will become My people. Then I will dwell in your midst, and you will know that the LORD of hosts has sent Me to you.…
Isaiah 40:0-11 “”say to the towns of Judah, ‘Here is your God’ 10 See, the Sovereign Lord comes with power, and his arm rules for him, See his reward is with him, and his recompense accompanies him. He tenders his flock like a shepherd, he gathers the lambs in his arms and carries them close to heart; he gently leads those that have young.” (Please verify who fits in with this prophesy - Is it Jacob or Jesus Christ who said “I am the Good Shepherd?).
PLEASE HELP ME HERE
a Christian told me that verse 9 does not have to do with 10.... he said this
"In Hebrew there is no conjunction when the prepositions are included, as here the Vav does not function as a copulative, but rather as an inseparable preposition to indicate the object of the sentence
"
Zechariah 9:9-10 King James Version (KJV)
9 Rejoice greatly, O daughter of Zion; shout, O daughter of Jerusalem: behold, thy King cometh unto thee: he is just, and having salvation; lowly, and riding upon an ass, and upon a colt the foal of an ass.
10 ((And)) hebrew-->(Vav) I will cut off the chariot from Ephraim, and the horse from Jerusalem, and the battle bow shall be cut off: and he shall speak peace unto the heathen: and his dominion shall be from sea even to sea, and from the river even to the ends of the earth.
he says between verse 9 and 10 there are thousands of years by the middle... that 9 and 10 are diferents events with thousands of years by the middle
he said that the first event just happened with jesus verse 9
is that true?
excuse my english
OK, but what are you asking?
@@curtisscissons563 HEY, HI..
a Christian told me that verse 9 does not have to do with 10.... he said this
"In Hebrew there is no conjunction when the prepositions are included, as here the Vav does not function as a copulative, but rather as an inseparable preposition to indicate the object of the sentence
"
Zechariah 9:9-10 King James Version (KJV)
9 Rejoice greatly, O daughter of Zion; shout, O daughter of Jerusalem: behold, thy King cometh unto thee: he is just, and having salvation; lowly, and riding upon an ass, and upon a colt the foal of an ass.
10 ((And)) hebrew-->(Vav) I will cut off the chariot from Ephraim, and the horse from Jerusalem, and the battle bow shall be cut off: and he shall speak peace unto the heathen: and his dominion shall be from sea even to sea, and from the river even to the ends of the earth.
he says between verse 9 and 10 there are thousands of years by the middle... that 9 and 10 are diferents events with thousands of years by the middle
he said that the first event just happened with jesus verse 9
is that true?
excuse my english
The English is no problem. As for the question, anytime a Christian tells you anything about Hebrew, or the Hebrew Bible, they are usually wrong. It's either deliberate, or they don't know any better. The only way to avoid such confusion is to not listen to anything a Christian tells you about "Jesus in the OT" Think about their claim for a minute.. The biggest event in the whole history of mankind, the arrival of the messiah, and event that would re-shape the world, and the best they can come up with is ONE SINGLE HEBREW LETTER IN Zechariah??" You see how silly it is, when looked at logically? But let's get to your point.. The whole thing rests on a mistake that in this case the Vav (Hebrew for and" when attached to a word like this), does not act as "and" in this case. This is flat-out wrong, and can be seen in several verses right above this one. The beginning of verse 10 is "And". But they never tell you the same exact letter configuration is ALSO in Verse 7, and verse 8. Verses 7,8 and 10 all say "and I will" Verse 7 "and I will take" verse 8 "And I will encamp" and verse 10 "And I will cut off" There is not several thousand year time jump here. This is a standard Christian tactic called "Progressive revelation" and is nonsense. Don't believe a word of it.
Curtis Scissons 🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽 hashem bless you and your family... i'm going take a look 🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽
Hope this helped!
Yes l can see your confusion. Often in recording events there do appear to be apparent contradictions. However when all four records are put together it becomes clear that there is no contradictions.
When all four are put together, they are nothing BUT contradictions
LOL No not at all. Its just that we are often unable to understand how they are all saying the same thing. This is very very common when we read testimonies from four witnesses.
@@HomeBibleCollege 1. They are not eyewitness accounts . 2. They do contradict one another 3. Perfect example - what day was jesus crucified ?
@@jacobdaniel5989 All four Gospel writers say that Christ died on the Preparation day. Ie the preparation of the Passover. The Passover is always on the 14th. Christ died on the Wednesday.
@@HomeBibleCollege So if it was preparation day on which Yeshua died, how is it they had the last supper together: the traitor headed out supposedly to get some things for the feast? I don't know about you, but I assumed that it was the Passover that Yeshua was partaking in, due to Peter's question where do you want us to go to make preparations for the Passover. If that's the case, then preparation day was long since passed after this main Passover day, at least by 2 days. Can you please explain that one to me?
It’s interesting to see a rabbi point out some contradictions pointed already by some muslims regarding the numbers in Tanak. And also the history regarding how the jewish bible has been rewrited after during the exile.
I’m not going to discuss more about the non sense of Christianity and the christian bible. God is One.
There no God to be worship except the only One true God. The God of Adam, Noah, Abraham, Moses, Jesus (he is a human being), Mohammed and all the prophets and messenger.
But today the only Holy book with no contradictions and which is the only one we can reproduce originaly is all books are lost is the Quran.
I would really want to have the Rabbi perspective about the histories of Moses for example according to Quran.
What I get from islamic scholars is that the history of the Prophets in the Quran are some keys elements God wanted to clarify to humans like the story of Aron with the cow or Job or Noah etc just to correct some narrations regarding the Bible and to clear the prophets honors.
What is your personnal point of view Rabbi regarding Quran?
@@89pok I was asking to the Rabbi. Not to someone who lacks knowledge and an Islam hater.
At the end, what is the book memorized by millions from page to page?
What is the book which is the most preserved?
For Muslims, prophets are the best of human beings and that’s why they were choosen by God to be prophets and they obey to God.
Muslims don’t disrespect prophets and do not lie about God message.
So really, I really do not care about your opinion and I am not here to debate or try to convince about anything.
Have a nice day and peace be with you ✌🏾
Exodus 20:2-4
Thou shalt have no other Gods before me...
Numbers 6:24-26
The Lord bless you and keep you ( Jehovah )
The Lord make his face shine on you and be gracious to you ( Jesus )
The Lord turn his face toward you and give you peace ( Jacob )
Luke 6:46
Why do you call me, Lord, Lord and do not do what I say?
Isaiah ( Prophet for the last days ) 28:11
Because with stammering lips and with another tongue will he speak to this people.
29:22
Not now shall Jacob be ashamed and his face shall not grow pale.
John 4:24
God ( Jehovah ) is Spirit...
( And he can rest that Spirit on any man he chooses )
1Peter 3:12-13
For the eyes of the Lord ( Jesus ) are on the righteous and his ears are attentive to their prayer. But the face of the Lord ( Jacob ) is against those who do evil. Who is going to harm you if you are eager to do good?
Psalm 135:4
For the Lord has chosen Jacob to be his own. Israel to be his treasured possession.
Psalm 136:3
O give thanks unto the Lord of Lords, for his mercy endureth forever.
WORSHIP ONE GOD
JEHOVAH
Jehovah - Jesus - Jacob
Contradictions are because man has to rise above these contradictions.
Abraham Daniel
This is the best comment in this entire comment section. God bless you in these uncertain times 🙏🏽❤️
Dumb excuses
So you believe G-d is a liar and a conman then?
Contrary to the popular lie the Israelite (Negro) Bible is not a Christian book, nor were the followers of Christ Christians (but Israelite who were
called Christians-Acts 11:26 and Niger-Acts 13:1), nor is there any Christian doctrine written in the Israelite Bible (Negro History and Law Book).
@Deals DurbanFather Jacob is the forefather of the Negro 12 Tribes and you lied on the Creator, the Son, the Prophets and the Apostles.
@Deals Durbanplease show me book, chapter and verse were the Armenian fled into Africa and later came to the America's on cargo slave ships (?) you people delusional.
@Deals Durbin Some people come in here with one thought only, and no matter what you try to tell them,. they ignore it and keep harping on the same subject over and over. Make Hood doesn't want to discuss anything, he's just got this pet theory that the ACTUAL Jews are black, and he won't listen to reason,. or engage in rational discussion. Best to move on
You will see that Yeshua never contradicted the Torah. He fulfilled the Torah by offering up himself as a sacrifice so that you could have salvation. Is that not the work of a loving GOD?
No. Because G-d himself says one person can't atone for another's sins. If Jesus says the opposite, he's lying, and just one more reason why any righteous person should want nothing to do with the Christian Bible
@@curtisscissons563 and the Talmud? The Israelis cling to that book too.
@Justin Martinez "Israeli" is a citizen of Israel, not necessarily a Jew. And what about the Talmud? it's basically a reference book.
If there were two numbers as a result of the count of men of fighting age, and one includes Benjamin and Levi, 1 Chronicles 21:5; and the other excludes Benjamin and Levi, 2 Samuel24:9, surely there must have been two counts. Because how would you know how many men there were including Benjamin and Levi, if you hadn't counted them. And 1 Chronicles 21:6 says Benjamin and Levi were specifically excluded because Joab did not follow King David's orders. So logically, Joab could not have been able to count all the men including Benjamin and Levi, and count all the men, excluding Benjamin and Levi, at the same time! Sorry, but you can't have it both ways, it would make logical nonsense. And the numbers for the men of Judah are reversed. There were more "valiant" men (500,000) in 2 Samuel 24:9, than ordinary, or "non-valiant" men (470,000) in 1Chronicles 21:5, which belies the theory of there generally being less "valiant" men. Therefore, the Old Testament also contains at least one unexplainable contradiction.
Why didn't the Angel of YHWH know that Abram/Abraham had another (and older) son -- Ishmael -- when He prevented him from following through with the almost-sacrifice of Isaac? He refers to "your son, your ONLY son Isaac, whom you love" [Gen. 22:2] and "your son, your ONLY son" [Gen. 22:12], despite the fact that "God said to Abraham, 'Be not displeased because of the lad [Ishmael] and because of your slave woman [Ishmael's mother Hagar] . . . I will make a nation of the son of the slave woman also, because he is YOUR OFFSPRING" [Gen. 21:12-13].
This, it seems to me, is a glaring contradiction, and not merely from one set of scriptures to another -- i.e. Old vs. New Testaments -- and not between two books within a canon -- i.e. Kings vs. Chronicles -- but within a single book [i.e. Genesis], a mere chapter apart. I could buy into the notion that we're talking about differing source texts utilized by the author(s) of Genesis -- the "J", "E", "P", and "D" sources hypothesized in the Documentary Hypothesis -- sources with differing information that nonetheless were all included and not 'harmonized' by a Redactor, but I would be interested in hearing someone such as you make an attempt to 'solve' this contradiction.
Was Ishmael the son of Abram/Abraham or not? And, if he was, why wouldn't the Angel of YHWH acknowledge this, instead implying that Isaac is Abraham's ONLY son?
Ishmael was conceived for one reason and one reason alone: Abraham didn't believe G-d could allow Sarah to have a child, so he took matters into his own hands. Between this and essentially disinheriting him by leaving him to die in the desert, Ishmael was completely and totally discounted.
With all due respect, you're wrong. In Genesis 15, Abram laments that Eliezer of Damascus will inherit his estate, rather than a child of his own, but then God promises Abram that "a son coming from your own body will be your heir" . . . and we're told "Abram believed the LORD, and he credited it to him as righteousness."
God then affirms that "To your descendants I give this land" etc. etc.
Genesis 16 opens with Sarai saying to her husband Abram: "The LORD has kept me from having children. Go, sleep with my maidservant; perhaps I can build a family through her."
Sarai must have been sleeping with Abram before this incident -- trying and failing to become impregnated by her husband; however, she deduces that YHWH Himself is the root cause of her barrenness, saying He "has kept me from having children."
Up until this point, all God had promised Abram was that his descendants will inherit his estate and take possession of the Promised Land -- and a child begotten on Sarai's maidservant literally would fit the bill just as well as a later 'miraculously' begotten child on Sarai would.
Ishmael is just as much of a 'descendant' of Abram as Isaac is. Isaac was NOT Abram's "only" son, though he may very well have been the only son he truly loved -- not even intervening when Sarai (into whose hands he had given her maidservant Hagar) called for him to "Get rid of the slave woman [Hagar] and her son [Ishmael], because God told him [now Abraham] "Do not be so distressed about the boy and your maidservant. Listen to whatever Sarah tells you, because it is through Isaac that your offspring will be reckoned. I will make the son of the maidservant into a nation also, because he is your offspring."
Ishmael "IS YOUR OFFSPRING," God tells Abraham, his son through Hagar. If God can demand that Abraham's inheritance shall proceed through his son born to Sarai/Sarah, well, that's all fine and dandy . . . but to pretend that Isaac is Abraham's ONLY son is just a lie. There's no excuse for the same God who expressly stated that Ishmael "is your offspring" to later declare Isaac to be "your only son." If God had opened Sarai's womb earlier, and enabled her to conceive sooner, then she would not have resorted to the desperate ploy of having her husband sleep with Hagar -- and God COULD have closed up Hagar's womb so as not to have had Ishmael enter the picture in the first place.
To this day, the supposed descendants of Ishmael -- the Arab peoples -- claim descent from their father, whom they call Ibrahim. Ishmael never sold whatever 'birthright' he should have had as the Firstborn son of Abraham -- unlike Esau, who sold his birthright to Jacob. Don't modern orthodox Jews consider the Arab peoples to be Ishmaelites, their fellow descendants from father Abraham? So, why does an "angel of the Lord" refer to Isaac as Abraham's ONLY son, contradicting God Himself -- who "is" himself?
@@patricktilton5377
Oh, of course. I'm the one whose wrong. It,as not like I've spent half my life studying this exact tractate in it's original language.
Ishmael had no reason to exist, and as you yourself had said: Isaac is the only one that will inherit anything as dictated by G-d. As far as anything else is concerned Ishmael is as good as dead by this point. He has no inheritance because G-d commands him to have no inheritance.
Regardless of whether or not Ishmael was ever to inherit anything, he was the son of Abraham before Isaac was ever conceived, and he was still alive when the angel of the Lord spoke of Isaac as Abraham's "only son" -- which makes the Lord and/or His angel to be confused, mistaken, or a liar.
As for Ishmael having had no reason to exist -- your words! -- the only reason he was begotten (according to these stories) is because Sarai was desperate to provide a son for her husband, yet God had closed her womb -- causing her to have her husband beget a child on her handmaiden. If God would just have opened Sarai's womb, there wouldn't have been any future conflicts involving the Abrahamic offspring of Ishmael and Isaac.
For what it's worth, I don't consider Genesis to be 'history': it's a collection of stories written well after-the-fact by people trying to justify their claims to the real estate between Egypt and the lands occupied by the Hittites and Mesopotamians. You probably disagree with my view. But, regardless, I have long felt that we can't understand the present-day conflicts in the Middle East without an understanding of the scriptural bases for the claims made by the people who claim descent from Isaac or Ishmael. We are trapped in a 3,000 year old storyline, whether we like it or not, whether we believe the story is literally true or not. I myself DON'T believe the story is true, one reason being that the 'god' character makes the mistake of contradicting Himself -- saying (on the one hand) that Ishmael is Abraham's offspring, then (on the other hand) saying that Isaac is Abraham's "only son." Your attempt at an interpretation for this flub just doesn't cut it with me.
Let's agree to just disagree, okay?
He came to his
s own n his own knew him not
The Bible story can be put into mathematical form with significant numbers 1, 3 and 9.
When the number 9 is reached, everything is ready.
This simple formula has reached with Gentile math.
Through it, it may seem true that the Jews' thinking of the Trinity is wrong.
It's not what they claim.
God is perfection when he has created something and there is a trinity in it.
When God created the right and wrong, there is a trinity that is GOOD.
When God created man, there are three and it was GOOD.
GOD, man, and woman.
Family; man woman, and son
All of them have GOD over everyone else.
To make humankind ONE, there's needed Jesus, Israel and Gentiles. God is over all.
@Deals Durban God is number ONE and humankind have to reach to number 9.
When God made the covenant with Israel, God set the law so that all three are in harmony.
These; God, man and Israel.
Therefore the law was collective in nature and bound the sins of the individual to influence the fate of the whole nation. In this way a second triangle was created.
I added the third triangle to my previous message.
Of these three steps, 3x3 = 9 is generated
1Cor. 15:28 And when all things shall be subdued unto him, then shall
the Son also himself be subject unto him that put all things under him,
that God may be all in all.
Do you see the trinity? Trinity up and trinity down.
In the law of God, collectivity is in a high position!
We'll do the work for everyone like our savior so that no one is left out!
Wait, you got ten?? I got 613
@Ricardo Petrov OO! Can I say it too? I have way better comments on Jesus than Paula does! How about... "This Jesus person is nothing but the incarnation of a bunch of deluded gullible sheep, who wanted the promises G-d gave to the Jews, but not the responsibilities. Jesus has brought nothing but pain and sorrow to the world, and the fact that he's dead is the REAL "Good News" The hands of Jesus and his followers are dripping with the blood of millions of my ancestors, all for the crime of not bowing down to a fake, dead, failed messiah. No other entity in the whole of human history has been responsible for more death and torture than Jesus and his followers. Christianity preaches love, but PRACTICES hate, in perfect harmony with their cult leader, Jesus." Is that enough to get me "reported" too? Or would you like more? Tip, this was actually the "G"-rated version. You don't want to read my PG one.
@Paula Wallace It's going on your PERMANENT RECORD!!!
@Deals Durban Quit making me laugh!!
Their will never be a third temple built for one.. and second the true pedigree of the 12 tribes are no longer in existence and the messiah would have to be a direct descendent of David. With more then thousands of yrs lost and intermingled with other lineages....come on that's a total shame. Whoever denies the son on earth jesus my father God will denies he or she.
Isaiah ( Prophet for the last days ) in Great Isaiah Scroll:
43:1
But now thus says YHWH your creator, Jacob, and the one who formed you O Israel....
43:4
Because you were precious in my sight, you have been glorified and I loved you. Therefore I give the men for you and people instead for your soul.
43:7
for I have created him for my glory, I have formed him, yes, I have made him.
( Jacob a Hebrew man final servant of Jehovah )
43:27-28
Your first father sinned and your leaders transgressed against me. And I have cursed the princes of holiness and gave Jacob to the curse and Israel to reproaches.
( Gave Jacob to the curse )
53:4
Surely our griefs he is bearing and our sorrows he carried them and we esteemed him beaten and struck God and afflicted.
53:7
He was oppressed and he was afflicted and not open his mouth, as a lamb to the slaughter he is brought.....
53:8
Because from the transgressions of his people a wound was to him.
53:10
And YHWH was pleased to crush him and he has caused him grief.
53:11
and by his knowledge shall he make righteous my righteous servant and their iniquities he will bear.
53:12
he laid bare to death his soul and with the transgressors he was numbered, and he, the sins of many he bore....
( These verses are not about Jesus.Definitely not about Israel. They are about Jacob a Hebrew man final servant of Jehovah )
Isaiah ( Prophet for the last days ) Masoretic Text:
53:3
a man of pains and acquainted with disease and as one whom men hide their face....
53:4
We did esteem him stricken, smitten of YHWH and afflicted.
Babylonian Talmud
Sanhedrin 98b
The Rabbi's said: His name is the leper scholar, as it is written. Surely he hath borne our griefs and carried our sorrows. Yet we did esteem him a leper, smitten of YHWH and afflicted.
( Rabbi's debating the name of the Messiah from Isaiah chapter 53 )
Psalm 135:4
For the Lord has chosen Jacob to be his own. Israel to be his treasured possession.
Jehovah - Jesus - Jacob
You have only quoted a response from Sanhedrin 98b . ...why not the rest?
Worship Jehovah, please clarify: you believe that the Talmud is inspired, authoritative scripture?
Do you read it regularly for knowledge?
He's posted that a thousand times in different chats. He never answers. He just wants attention.
Had the sun risen when the women arrived at the tomb? Dr. Pinchas Lapide is the author of "The Resurrection of Jesus: A Jewish Perspective" and he wrote the following (pp. 114-115):
"Matthew puts [the resurrection] at night, right after the end of the Sabbath, but Mark and Luke in the early Easter Sunday morning. The obscure formulation of Matthew, which is awkward in Greek (28:1) 'now after the Sabbath, toward the dawn of the first day of the week (or: of the Sabbath),' or according to the Elberfeld translation, 'Late on the Sabbath in the dawn of the first day of the week...' seems to be based on an idiom current in Mishnah Hebrew: Bemotzaei-Shabbat or le-ehad be-Shabbat which means literally: 'At the end of the Sabbath in the light toward the first day...,' but which, by means of a euphemism (light = night) intends to say nothing else but: 'at the end of the Sabbath, in the night before Sunday.'
Basic is the fact that the Sabbath since Genesis 1:5 begins on Friday evening and ends on the next evening just as each new day lasts 'from evening to evening' (Lev. 23:32). Unfamiliarity with this Hebraism seems to have led to contradictory statements of time in the Gospels.
The dejection of the disciples since Good Friday speaks in any case in favor of a visit to the tomb as early as possible, i.e., at the beginning of the night which coincides with the end of the Sabbath as is testified by the retranslation into Hebrew of the passage which is so obscure in Greek."
Lev. 23:32 - "From evening unto evening shall ye keep your Sabbath."
Also, we have to consider that any part of a day was regarded as a FULL DAY. We see this very clearly in the Book of Esther:
Esther 4:16 - "Go ... neither eat nor drink three days, night or day ... and so will I go in unto the king."
Esther 5:1 - "On the third day Esther put on her royal robes and stood in the inner court of the palace, in front of the king's hall."
If Esther had to wait a full 72 hours, then why doesn't the verse say "On the fourth day" or "After the third day"...? Why? Because any part of a day in Judaism is counted as a full day - even when the specific provision "night and day" is given.
The Jewish Encyclopedia states:
"In Jewish communal life part of a day is at times reckoned as one day; e.g., the day of the funeral, even when the latter takes place late in the afternoon, is counted as the first of the seven days of mourning; a short time in the morning of the seventh day is counted as the seventh day; circumcision takes place on the eighth day, even though of the first day only a few minutes remained after the birth of the child, these being counted as one day. Again, a man who hears of a vow made by his wife or his daughter, and desires to cancel the vow, must do so on the same day on which he hears of it, as otherwise the protest has no effect; even if the hearing takes place a little time before night, the annulment must be done within that little time. The day is reckoned from evening to evening...."
The bottom line is this.... The women went to the tomb immediately following the termination of Shabbat on Saturday evening, after the first three stars appeared in the sky, which officially started the first day of the week. Cf. "Twilight, Sunset and Night" by Rabbi David Bassous.
BLIND Tovia Singer, your points are very spurious
Nice shirt rabbi. :-)
Matthew 15:14 King James Version (KJV)
14 Let them alone: they be blind leaders of the blind. And if the blind lead the blind, both shall fall into the ditch.
Jesus said call no man rabbi or father other than himself,or you can call your bilogicial Dad father but as a Christian no we are not to call anyone rabbi or Father nor have female preaching an we do we are in the end of END TIME everything Bible says has happened or happening now open your eyes an find the true Messiah Lord Jesus Christ
old testament has contradiction as same as new testaments
But we have the Oral Torah that explains apparent contradictions. If you say so does the Christian holy books, than you have to accept ours.
You can't cherry pick one without the other.
Please, let us not infight. Love our Heavenly Father and His Son Yahshua 🙏🏽❤️
@@chanitalevitz4945 Some of the "contradictions" this person is expressing can actually be understood reading the Torah itself, I am sure that this person is not reading the surrounding verses as many of these claims wouldn't exist if he did. But yes the Oral Torah does explain at length all apparent contradictions
“Jesus is not the Mesiah, because there is no relationship between what the Tenarkh teaches, and what the Mashiach is supposed to do; and what the Christian Bible, and Church tells us Jesus did.”
The Rabbi makes this bombshell statement early in the talk, and then does absolutely nothing to substantiate it.
The facts are completely the opposite. Right through the Tenarkh, from Genesis, through to Malachi, there are scores of passages pointing forward to the Mashiach, which are fulfilled by Jesus.
I can’t cover them all here, but the following are just a few of them.
1. Abraham said, “God will provide for himself the lamb for a burnt offering, my son.” (Genesis 22:8) God sacrificed that Lamb of God in 31AD On the day of preparation for Passover, at the very time when the Passover lamb was being slaughtered.
2. God promised Abraham that the whole world would be blessed through his offspring (singular). (Gen 22:18) Who is the seed of Abraham through whom the whole world has been blessed? Who has more hospitals, schools, taking literacy and health to more remote parts of the world, bringing salvation to more people, giving them hope joy freedom and love, and bringing more people into the worship of the God of Israel, then anybody living in the world today, or in history? There is none like Jesus!
3. God made His covenant with Judah, "The sceptre shall not depart from Judah, nor a lawgiver from between his feet, until Shiloh come; and unto him shall the gathering of the people be," (Gen. 49:10) The Talmud says, “When the members of the Sanhedrin found themselves deprived of their right over life and death, they covered their heads with ashes and their bodies with sackcloth, and bemoaned, ‘Woe unto us for the scepter has departed from Judah and the Messiah has not come!’"(The Babylonian Talmud, Chapter 4, folio 37)
They actually thought that the Torah, the Word of God, had failed! At that very moment there was an 8-9 year old boy growing up in Galilee called Yeshua.
If Jesus isn’t the Messiah, then God has broken his covenant with Judah
4. God made a covenant with David, “I will establish the throne of his kingdom for ever. And your house and your knigdom shall be made sure for ever before me; your throne shall be established for ever." (2 Samuel 7: 12-17) Jesus is the fulfilment of that promise. Without Jesus as King of Kings, then that is another promise that God has broken.
5. All through the Pentateuch, God emphasises that for sin to be forgiven, then there must be the shedding of blood. From Adam and Eve’s first sin, Cain and Able, Noah, Abraham, the Passover, Moses and Aaron, David, and sacrifices in the Temple.
“Moses said to Aaron, ‘Come to the altar and sacrifice your sin offering and your burnt offering and make atonement for yourself and the people; sacrifice the offering that is for the people and make atonement for them, as the LORD has commanded’." (Leviticus 9:7)
However the, Talmud says, “Our Rabbis taught: during the last forty years before the destruction of the Temple the lot [‘For the Lord’] did not come up in the right hand; nor did the crimson-coloured strap become white; nor did the westernmost light shine; and the doors of the Hekal would open by themselves...”( Yoma 39b)
All of these incidences were signs that God had not accepted their sacrifice.
What happened just forty years before the temple was destroyed in 70AD?
The Lamb of God was sacrificed.
Since then, for 1990 years, the Jews who have rejected their Mashiach, have failed to keep the laws of Moses, regarding the sin sacrifices for attonement; since the Lamb of God, which God had promised to Abraham 2000 years earlier, was sacrificed on Calvary in 31AD; so that anyone who would accept him and believe on him, should not perish, but have eternal life.
6. Jeremiah said, “The days are coming,” declares the Lord, “when I will make a new covenant with the people of Israel and with the people of Judah... This is the covenant I will make with the people of Israel after that time, I will put my law in their minds and write it on their hearts. I will be their God, and they will be my people. (Jeremiah 31:31,33)
Luke 22:20 says, "In the same way, after the supper He took the cup, saying, 'This cup is the new covenant in My blood, which is poured out for you."
The new covenant means we can go directly to God through the Mashiach.
If you wanted me to, I could go on with scores of examples of how the Tenarkh points forward to the Messiah, and how Jesus, and only Jesus, fulfils those writings.
I’ll let you come to your own conclusions as to why the Rabbi should make such a bombshell of a statement, which is so patently untrue.
Actually youre confused. The blood of the new covenant was not blood from a literal cross just as his flesh was not literal manna, and circumcision is of the heart not flesh, and the temple is not made with literal stones. Romans desribes that we are reconciled for our PAST SINS because of his righteousness and obedience (death to his carnal man on his cross of self denial). Thats why he told his deciples to pick up their cross, deny themselves, and follow after him. How could they do that if he hadnt even died on a cross yet? And if its a literal cross and we must follow after him then there are a lot of Christians who have yet to die on a literal cross. The issue? Jesus never died on a literal cross as it was never necessary in the new covenant and God forbade human sacrifice and a brother cannot ransom another brother. You must die for your own future sins on your own cross like he did first as a LIVING SACRIFICE. Unfortunately, You do not know the old covenant nor do you realize the NT has been corrupted by Rome. Thats why you were told to establish his word by 2 or 3 witnesses and we are told that law and the prophets are the witness by which we compare. It must at least match that and God NEVER changes nor lied. The trinity is also a lie. All you have to do is compare the stories. Theres no way the birth and resurrection stories are true the way they are given. But the truth is there for those willing to study the OT types.
@@RoseSharon7777 Thank you for your reply.
I can assure you I am not confused. I know that Jesus was the Lamb of God, prophesied by Abraham, that He was sacrificed on the eve of Passover, at the time the Passover lambs were being slaughtered in the year 32AD, He died for the sins of many, as prophesied by Isiah, “For he bore the sin of many, and made intercession for the transgressors.” (Isiah 53:12) He bore my sins, and also died for your sins, but that atonement only comes into effect when you accept it.
All the parties involved with, and present at his execution by crucifixion; the Romans, the Jews, and His followers; all agree on these points:
1. It was really Jesus who was crucified. (this is the best documented event in ancient history, by a long way.)
2. He was crucified on the eve of Passover, at the time the sacrificial lamb was being slaughtered.
3. He was really dead.
4. He was placed in the tomb of Joseph of Arimathea.
5. On the Sunday, following the Sabbaths, the tomb was empty.
That is as far as agreement goes. The Jews then claim that the tomb was empty because His disciples stole the body; while His followers claim that He rose from the dead: they saw, talked with, touched, and ate with Him, before He ascended into Heaven forty days later. (If you want to know why I believe the apostles’ accounts are true, just question me and I will be happy to give you the rational reasons that come to the logical conclusion that Jesus rose from the dead.)
You say, “The blood of the new covenant was not blood from a literal cross.” I’m sorry to have to correct you, but all those involved with the crucifixion knew that it was Jesus mwho was crucified on a real cross, He bled real blood, He was really dead, and when the soldier thrust a spear into his side, real congealed blood gushed out.
He was obedient unto death! “And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself by becoming obedient to death-- even death on a cross!” (Paul, Philippians 2:8)
If you are going to be obedient, then it must be obedience in the real world; not just your imagination.
You point out that Jesus commanded His followers to take up their cross. Many of his followers did literally take up their crosses. All of the apostles, except John, met with violent, torturous deaths, for proclaiming that Jesus had been crucified for the sins of the world, and that He was risen from the dead. Even today many of His followers are being violently murdered by Isis, and other atheistic, and antichrist powers.
You say, “You must die for your own future sins on your own cross like he did first as a LIVING SACRIFICE” Jesus made the complete sacrifice for the sins of the world!
Isiah prophesied,
“10Yet it was the Lord’s will to crush him and cause him to suffer, and though the Lord makes his life an offering for sin,...
11After he has suffered, he will see the light of life and be satisfied; by his knowledge my righteous servant will justify many, and he will bear their iniquities.
12... he poured out his life unto death, and was numbered with the transgressors.
For he bore the sin of many, and made intercession for the transgressors.” (Is 53:10-12)
This is clearly stating that the Messiah would be sacrificed for the sins of many, that He would die, and that He would come back to life. This passage comes as part of a graphic description of Jesus’ crucifixion 750 years before the crucifixion.
The phrase, “LIVING SACRIFICE” comes from Paul in Romans 12:1 “Therefore, I urge you, brothers and sisters, in view of God's mercy, to offer your bodies as a living sacrifice, holy and pleasing to God--this is your true and proper worship.” Paul is urging us to live for God, our whole lives, because Jesus loves us so much, that He gave His whole life to save us from sin. Therefore, don’t make dead sacrifices of dead animals, or futile sacrifices as a suicide bomber; but a living sacrifice of our whole lives.
You say, “the NT has been corrupted by Rome,” but give absolutely no evidence to corroborate your statement. If you make grand statements like this, then you really should substantiate them, otherwise they aren’t worth replying to. The New Testament, especially the Gospels, are the most critiqued books in history, but they are still the biggest selling, and influential books in history.
What amazes me though, is that despite all the documented records of Jesus’ crucifixion, that there are people today, who would believe a man who came along 600 years later, who said it was OK to lie, so long it was helping to spread Islam, who married a six year old girl, and consummated that marriage when she was eleven, and who spread his lies through violent terror; who claimed that Jesus wasn’t crucified, nor did He die.
Without His death; there is no salvation.
May God bless you, and may you find the Truth.
There are NO contradicts in the new testament your reading through the eyes of men and without the Spirit . the new testament is the pure word of God and i will take the new testament over the views and opinions of men any day of the week !
Ang Cooper Amen!
Avraham, your father, was glad that he would see my day; then he saw it and was overjoyed.”
“Why, you’re not yet fifty years old,” the Judeans replied, “and you have seen Avraham?” Yeshua said to them, “Yes, indeed! Before Avraham came into being, I AM!” At this, they picked up stones to throw at him; but Yeshua was hidden and left the Temple grounds.
Since it is possible to mesh all 4 Gospel accounts of the cross and the tomb it is showing quite clearly that the 'experts' cannot to that so when there are more that 24 long passages about 'the day of the lord' it would be even more above their pay-grade. I'm quite sure that was not intended but it is what it is.
All the women leave the site of the cross at the same time and Jesus is put into a tomb close by and a rock rolled into place. Passover comes and goes, the weekly Sabbath comes and goes and about 6AM that same group of women (with Peter) leave Jerusalem to go to the tomb.
Mary M. goes ahead and sees the rock has been moved so she runs back to the same group and tells them that. Mary of Bethany out runs Peter and waits for him to enter the tomb. Since it is much different that when her own brother was resurrected a few days ago she knew He had been resurrected rather than his body stolen.
Joh:20:1-10:
The first day of the week cometh Mary Magdalene early,
when it was yet dark,
unto the sepulchre,
and seeth the stone taken away from the sepulchre.
Then she runneth,
and cometh to Simon Peter,
and to the other disciple,
whom Jesus loved,
and saith unto them,
They have taken away the Lord out of the sepulchre,
and we know not where they have laid him.
Peter therefore went forth,
and that other disciple,
and came to the sepulchre.
So they ran both together:
and the other disciple did outrun Peter,
and came first to the sepulchre.
And he stooping down,
and looking in,
saw the linen clothes lying;
yet went he not in.
Then cometh Simon Peter following him,
and went into the sepulchre,
and seeth the linen clothes lie,
And the napkin,
that was about his head,
not lying with the linen clothes,
but wrapped together in a place by itself.
Then went in also that other disciple,
which came first to the sepulchre,
and he saw, and believed.
For as yet they knew not the scripture,
that he must rise again from the dead.
Then the disciples went away again unto their own home.
Insert the version from Luke.
Isa:53 says Jesus would be a 'plain looking person' so He was in a perfected body when Mary M. mistook him for the Gardner. That was the case where Peter was naked as well. Mary of Bethany was the first to see Him for who He was.
Jeeeessuuss. The son of God loves you.
How tall was Goliath? Do we follow the MT or the DSS, LXX, and Josephus.
Five witnesses, five different stories-isn't that what always happens? Here is discussed the accounts of one eye-witness (John) and the story retold by Matthew. Add the other Gospel accounts and it gets even more confusing. It can be explained without too much torture. They tell the same story of and empty tomb, Mary Magdalene's encounter with Jesus and her telling the disciples after Peter and John's own discovery. But do the details even matter?
The only important thing is the resurrection-which is not contradicted by the accounts. That nagging resurrection which kept the disciples centered as they argued over circumcision, what to eat, the Law, tradition-and how to deal with the gentiles. So Peter, who saw with his own eyes would say to those who didn't regarding the grace of God, "and though you have not seen Him, ...you greatly rejoice."
The grace of God that I've heard you preach yourself, Tovia, is not relegated to one nation. This is about one obscure nomad's faith being communicated to everyone. "God so loved the world..." as the phrase goes-not just Abraham. But through him, "all nations would be blessed." That's what Jesus and the resurrection is about. And I'd say in spite of the weakness of men since, the empty tomb has worked gloriously.
You mentioned the Jews were in exile for 70 years. Do you realize the Persians revised the timeline? Lol. They did. They added 30 extra years to the rule of Darius I to make him old enough to be the grandfather of "Artaxerxes" who was actually Xerxes! Current historians and archaeologists are covering up the revisions. When they added 30 years to the reign of Darius, they removed 26 years from the Neo-Babylonian kings. So the popular NB period is 26 years shorter than the bible's NB period. The bible and Josephus introduce a 70-year desolation period beginning with the last deportation in year 23 of Nebuchadnezzar. (Jer. 52:30). Current popular history reflects just 44 years from year 23.
What's fun is checking out Persian archaeology. Records show Darius began the city in his 4th year, but he barely finished one building, his palace. This proves he died early in his reign in his 6th year, as the Bible says at Ezra 6:14, 15, placing "Artaxerxes" on the throne that same year.
The Babylonian chronicle clearly states it was "copied" (revised) in year 22 of Darius (II). So we know it was the Persians who revised the timeline.
But also of note from archaeology is evidence from Ashkelon that there was a 70-80 year desolation between the NB period ending in the Persian period. The bible says Ashkelon was destroyed after Jerusalem. So no problem harmonizing the facts once you correct the timeline. You also understand how Nehemiah can return with Zerubbabel and be at least age 30 and still live down into the reign of Darius II. Per the expanded Persian timeline, he'd be close to 150 years of age. So scholars claim the Nehemiah that returned with Zerubbabel is a different person than who served as cupbearer under Artaxerxes.
Bottom line is, you can't have a 70-year desolation/exile period starting from year 23 without correcting the timeline. Scholars are thus incompetent or liars. We have plenty of evidence to correct the timeline! Let me know if you want more information. But you should know bible chronologists have reset the timeline to the original dates. You should at least be aware of this. Radiocarbon-14 can be used to determine precise dates from the Exodus to the return from Babylon. One unfortunate casualty is the book of Esther, which is actually about Nehemiah, whose Babylonian name is Marduka (Mordecai). Esther is thus only pseudo-historical.
Thanks again for your videos.
Yep
@@curtisscissons563 Esther is an adaptation of the story of Nehemiah. In the original folkloric version, Nehemiah, being a eunuch, wss wildly effeminate. The Jews made fun of him and basically turned him into s "flaming queen" of the court before splitting his character between Esther and Mordecai, turning him into a real woman
In the folkloric version, Nehemiah has a crush on the handsome king, Artaxerxes, and when he requests to leave and return home. he is sitting on the king's lap and "batting his eyes" at the king. It is very embarrassing. So they just turned him into a real woman and it became a very popular fable.
But the basic story is the same. Both Nehemiah and Esther get bad news from home and want the sympathy of the king, so they first get him in a good mood with food and drink before showing him how upset and sad they are. The grants them their desire and somewhere down the road, Nehemiah and Esther get the Jews to take up arms in self defense. In the meantime, Nehemiah/Mordecai (Marduka) becomes very celebrated by Artaxerxes and second in the kingdom. Thus you can see Artaxerxes with his Jewish cupbearer, Nehemiah, all over Persepolis. So the book is not inspired.
@Paula Wallace Every time I come in here I learn something new! However, Nehemiah being trans is a new one on me. It's going in the book
@Paula Wallace Lol. Check it out. Artaxerxes is buried between Darius I and Darius II. Xerxes and Artaxerxes were the same king. But you will never believe it unless you check it out yourself. Just dismissing it as "TWISTING" is not good enough this time. Don't listen to pagan lies; trust the Bible. The truth is going to come out eventually, not to worry.
@Paula Wallace Three books in the current canon are not inspired and were not cross-quoted from by NT writers, so no problem dismissing them: Esther. Song of Solomon, and Ecclesiates.
The LXX version of Esther has her married to Artaxerxes. But when that overlapped canonical Nehemiah and it was clear Mordecai and Nehemiah were the same person, they changed the Hebrew version claiming she was married to "Ahasuerus"/Xerxes. So your choice which one you want to believe.
Josephus, who clearly knew Esther and Mordecai was a treatment of Nehemiah uses the LXX to link Esther to Artaxerxes, the "son of Xerxes," and has Nehemiah and Ezra coming before her during the fake rule of Xerxes. Now, of course, it's conveniently flipped, with Esther married to Xerxes and Ezra and Nehemiah correctly dated during the rule of Artaxerxes. But once you combine Xerxes and Artaxerxes, there's no place for Esther, unless you combine her with Nehemiah and Nehemiah becomes Mordecai. Keeping Esther "historical" might be one incentive for not exposing the revisions.
But truly, carry on as you will and believe anything and investigate nothing. Selective blindness (see no evil) works great as long as you keep your eyes tightly closed.
In Matthew, it had already began to dawn. In John, it was still dark. Mary made a couple trips back and forth. There’s no big mystery or contradiction there.
May the blessings of Messiah Christ from the Holy Shroud (Turin) that was set and cast aside from His Resurrection multiply and abound in you and in the world forever
This is very interesting and reminds me of something about the Christian bible which I’ve thought since I was young ... what if you made a bible which consists only of Jesus’ words and their context?
Could you imagine there ever being a Book of Jesus in Tanach, if it were parsed properly?
Paula Wallace well, he called himself the equivalent of the Greek Word “huios“ of God (son or apostle), but in his own words he never claimed to be God
"I and my father are one?" "If you've seen me, you've seen the father"?
Paula Wallace there’s a flurry of things to unpack which would require much time, but I’ll summarize by saying that much distortion was done while translating into English (through the lens of Nicene Creed bound scribes) .. he said things like “I am in the Father and the Father is in me”... but also “I go to my God and your God”... “I can do nothing on my own, but only by the Father who sent me”
Paula Wallace I can retranslate one or two verses, but it’s quite a time consuming task, so I’d prefer not to do more than that. If you point to one or two verses in question, I’ll analyze the Greek and offer an alternative translation
Paula Wallace I’ve been as polite as possible. You’ve stated your beliefs. Everyone has heard them. Please move on.
There is NO contradiction between the teaching of resurrection in the Hebrew scriptures or resurrection in the Christian Greek scriptures. First, here is what the condition of the dead is according to the Hebrew scriptures:
Ecclesiastes 9:4-6, 10 "4 There is hope for whoever is among the living, because a live dog is better off than a dead lion. 5 For the living know that they will die, but the dead know nothing at all, nor do they have any more reward, because all memory of them is forgotten. 6 Also, their love and their hate and their jealousy have already perished, and they no longer have any share in what is done under the sun. 10 Whatever your hand finds to do, do with all your might, for there is no work nor planning nor knowledge nor wisdom in the Grave, where you are going."
In other words, you will never see anything in a dead person other than exactly what it says here....when you are dead, you are dead...PERIOD!
So what hope is there for the dead as the bible teaches? Well, consider the following from both the Hebrew scriptures and the Christian Greek scriptures:
Job 14:13-15 "O that in the Grave you would conceal me,
That you would hide me until your anger passes by,
That you would set a time limit for me and remember me!
14 If a man dies, can he live again?
I will wait all the days of my compulsory service
Until my relief comes.
15 You will call, and I will answer you.
You will long for the work of your hands."
Job believed that God would resurrect him back from the grave....that he would "set a time limit for me" and "remember me". His final statement was that God LONGS to resurrect people...."You will long for the work of your hands".
There are several occurrences of resurrection from the grave in the bible, both in the Hebrew scriptures and also in the Christian Greek scriptures:
Resurrections were performed by or through the prophets Elijah and Elisha. (1Ki 17:17-24; 2Ki 4:32-37; 13:20, 21)
Resurrections were also performed in the Christian Greek scriptures...three by Jesus (Lazarus, Jairus' daughter and the son of the widow of Nain).
Two resurrections were also performed by God directly, one in the Hebrew scriptures with the man whose corpse touched Elisha’s bones and one in the Christian Greek scriptures when God resurrected Jesus from the grave.
In the Hebrew scriptures, it tells us that the Messiah will be responsible for resurrecting the dead from the grave (those asleep in the dust):
Dan.12:1, 2 "“During that time Miʹcha·el will stand up, the great prince who is standing in behalf of your people. And there will occur a time of distress such as has not occurred since there came to be a nation until that time. And during that time your people will escape, everyone who is found written down in the book. 2 And many of those asleep in the dust of the earth will wake up, some to everlasting life and others to reproach and to everlasting contempt."
In the Christian Greek scriptures it ALSO tells us that the Messiah will be responsible for resurrecting the dead from the grave in John chapter 5 and 1Thessalonians chapter 4:
John 5:25, 28, 29 " “Most truly I say to you, the hour is coming, and it is now, when the dead will hear the voice of the Son of God, and those who have paid attention will live. 28 Do not be amazed at this, for the hour is coming in which all those in the memorial tombs will hear his voice 29 and come out, those who did good things to a resurrection of life, and those who practiced vile things to a resurrection of judgment."
1Thessalonians 4: 16 " because the Lord himself will descend from heaven with a commanding call, with an archangel’s voice and with God’s trumpet, and those who are dead in union with Christ will rise first."
The "great prince", Michael, as spoken of in Daniel 12:1 is the great princely Son of God, the angel of Jehovah.
The "archangel" spoken of at 1Thessalonians 4:16 is the angel of Jehovah, the archangel Michael. (arche...chief or main....and angelos....angel)
What will be the end result after the resurrection of the dead in the paradise earth under the rulership of God's Son?:
According to the Hebrew scriptures:
Isaiah 25:8 " He will swallow up death forever,
And the Sovereign Lord Jehovah will wipe away the tears from all faces.
The reproach of his people he will take away from all the earth,
For Jehovah himself has spoken it."
According to the Christian Greek scriptures:
Revelation 21:3, 4 " With that I heard a loud voice from the throne say: “Look! The tent of God is with mankind, and he will reside with them, and they will be his people. And God himself will be with them. 4 And he will wipe out every tear from their eyes, and death will be no more, neither will mourning nor outcry nor pain be anymore. The former things have passed away.”
There is absolutely no difference in what the Hebrew scriptures or the Christian Greek scriptures teach about God's kingdom. Nor is there any difference in what they teach about the hope of the resurrection of the dead from the grave. Jesus Christ was a Jew and he taught about his God and Father's kingdom as a Jew!
All four gospels are in complete agreement: He is not here! He has risen! Indeed, God did not abandon him to the grave or let his holy one see decay. (Psalm 110) This is none other than David's son and David's Lord, even Jesus the lamb who was slain for the sins of the world. Stop doubting and believe!
So did G-d forget how to count then?
Noahide... I still have yet to find this in any Bible.
So apauling
Thanks for your video.
BTW, there were three different Mary Magdalenes, all relatives of Jesus who come to the tomb three different times under three different circumstances.
First MM comes while still dark, alone, sees Jesus in the garden.
Then a second MM comes with another Mary to watch the tomb. They bring no spices. They see the angels and rush away, bumping into Jesus along the way. They grab him and kiss him, so they are clearly relatives, which also explains why they are coming to the tomb, they know him personally, and he knows them.
The third MM who is a member of the household of Jesus' mother, comes to the tomb with the family bringing spices. They don't arrive until just after sunrise.
Three distinctly different times and three distinctly different circumstances. But cultural bias prefers to ignore the obvious and claim the gospels contradict the account. So scholarly incompetence again gives the Bible a bad name.
Someone Jewish, for instance, knows Passover is ALWAYS eaten on the 15th, when you change the date at sundown. When the Israelites first left Egypt though, they changed the date at midnight like the Egytians, so while they left Egypt after midnight on the 15th, Passover is said to take place on the 14th, but that is because Passover ends specifically at midnight when the angel of death comes. Jesus could not have died the same day he ate Passover. He died the next day of preparation that week in Nisan 20th, a Thursday, so that is where the "three nights" come in.
I corrected you on the three MMs, so why can't you point out to Christians Passover is ALWAYS eaten on a high Sabbath day, the first day of unleavened bread? Two issues are very crrectable; why don't you jump on this and correct them?
Thanks again.
Look back at what you just posted "There are three different Mary Magdalenes." Where does it say this in the Christian Bible? Is that what you have to do to get these contradictory accounts to agree? Seems a little sketchy. (OK, a LOT sketchy.)
@@curtisscissons563 Once you realize these are relatives of Jesus from the same family and location, it's not so sketchy. But it's your choice; three different stories, three different women, or just one woman and a lot of confusion.
@Paula Wallace No there aren't three Marys. This is just an excuse to get around the contradictions in the Christian Gospels. No where does it even hint there are three different Marys
Charlie Smit, so if Jesus died on the day after Passover (the next day, as you maintain), then why does John 18:28 say:
"When Jesus was arrested, the Jews did not enter Pilate's judgment hall,
BECAUSE THEY WANTED TO STAY CLEAN TO EAT THE PASSOVER. " This means that they had not eaten the Passover before his arrest. The day of the Passover had not yet arrived. In John's Gospel, Jesus is crucified on the day of Preparation, which is the day before Passover. So, he is slaughtered like a Passover lamb on the day before Passover. But the other Gospels contradict this, having Jesus slain AFTER he has eaten Passover with the apostles. The conflicting day of the crucifixion is possibly the greatest contradiction between the Gospel stories.
@@curtisscissons563 Your choice. Three Marys or there contradictions.
Rabbi, no I went through the texts. The confusion comes from interpreting Mary. There were a group of women with 2 Mary's and another different Mary(the one with the 7 devils). She got to the grave after the group. She was the first one to see Jesus. I have a very solid explanation for the facts. The first Mary to see Jesus, was nowhere refenced to the same Mary as the earlier event where at least one of the two Marys is the mother of James. I have encountered many situations in my life where I met, let's say 3 Isaacs at the same event and one Isaac pitched up a bit later when the first 2 Isaacs have left already The second Isaac may witness different as well as similar events. There is even explicit prove that a specific Mary was different from another Mary. The issue is also that all information is not always captured by eyewitness reports, but mostly those established as fact by the witness. I can imagine with so many Marys it will require four gospels to integratecthe facts. For example, the gospel of Mark speaks of an earlier event where it is clear that the angel(s) told the earlier Mary(s) about Jesus that rose from the tomb. Mary(the one with the 7 devils) is a later event and she was not yet informed by the angel. And then as she turned back, she saw Jesus. He told her not to touch Him, since He had not been to The Father yet. He must have spiritually assended and descended in man's earthly time and then later meet Thomas and other disciples who physically touched Him, since He already met with The Father. There are many events that took place, but they can be explained and time synchronised. I am very happy with the explanation(s). It is very real life, not one dimensional and without the true spirit of how things happen in real life.
Thank you, I agree and would also like to add that who said what, first , defeats the broader picture that the stated resurrection did occur. The rabbi is splitting hairs - like who told the grandparents about a new baby in the family...the son, daughter - in law , a friend...when they were all seated on the same table.
But both Mathew 28 and John 20 specify that is Mary Magdalene.
Rabbi Tovia after doing my own examination of Matthew 28 and John 20 I have come to realize that both tell the same story and not two different stories as you suppose. The main point of the story is about Mary Magdalene coming to the empty tomb and she encounters the risen Lord Jesus and then giving the disciples the good news that he had risen back to life The rest are just details that are not that important. So no contradictions. Nevertheless your video was very interesting so thanks for this one it opened up my eyes to see something I didn’t notice before!
Bernie Flores wrong
There is no colossal contradiction. It will finally be discovered that the gospel of Matthew was assembled after the others. The gospel of John is the most Christological of them all. I will cease and desist from aligning Christ with the Jewish scriptures, and referring to Him as the Messiah (a Jewish narrative.) Even though Jesus was a Jew, John the Baptist, Yeshua, Saul and His 12 Disciples was formed from the Christ being to minister to mankind. Whether or not people choose to accept them and their mission is completely dependent upon one's current level of intelligence and free will. To GOD be the glory!
"The lady doth protest too much, methinks" (Shakespeare)
I don’t believe in the Easter Bunny, but I don’t make it my life’s campaign to destroy any belief in that bunny.
However, the Rabbi’s dishonest rant goes well beyond that of somebody simply not believing that Jesus is the Jewish Messiah. Why?
To an observer who understands the hundreds of passages in the Tanakh, that point towards the coming Messiah, and how Jesus, and only Jesus, fulfilled them; and understands the history of the destruction of the Temple, the Levitical Order, and therefore the impossibility of any continuing sacrifices of atonement; it is obvious that Jesus is the Lamb of God prophesied by Abraham, and is the Messiah of Israel.
The Rabbi presents himself as an expert on the Tanakh, and the New Testament, so why can’t he see this; and why would he lie that the life of Jesus doesn’t fulfill the teaching of the Tanakh, when it is obvious that it does. There has to be more to it then what is rational.
It isn’t that Jesus doesn’t fit the teachings of the Tanakh, but it is that Jesus doesn’t fit the desires of the Rabbinic Jews, the followers of the Pharisees. They didn’t want the Lamb of God sacrificed for the sin of many, but a conquering messiah, who will subjugate their enemies and bring them political power.
This was clearly demonstrated in the third Jewish rebellion; when Bar Kokhba, a violent rebel leader, who they thought would overthrow the Romans, and give them freedom; was declared to be the Messiah by the Rabbis. Well that didn’t end well and led to the total dispersal of Jews out of Palestine and the final split between the Yeshua Mashiach believing Jews, and the Rabbinic Jews.
It is still the same today. The Rabbis don’t want their Messiah, who is the Lamb of God, as promised in the Tanakh, who brings billions of goy into a direct worshipful relationship with the Lord God of Israel; but they want a military messiah who will subdue their enemies, and make them the preeminent nation, and all people on Earth will have to worship their God, through them.
There are no instances in the Renewed Covenant Writings that contradict the Torah or Tanach. If there is a small error then the latter corrects the former.