In this comparison the Selmer sounded best to me. It had a lot more mid range body to it without losing the ability to play with volume. All three great though. Pretty playing 👍
In my opinion, the buffet in live performance has a more expressive and charismatic sound. Recently, I've also come to enjoy the sound of Selmer; perhaps in live performance, the buffet sounds even more presentable, but it's not noticeable in recordings. Yanagisawa is a workhorse instrument for those who don't want to fuss around or search for something unusual; Yanagisawa is an excellent instrument.
The Selmer have a complex sort of "zing" to it, the Buffet have a brighter or more responsive core I think but less complex a sound. I wondered which is your personal favourite?
love the sound I must try to play that!
In this comparison the Selmer sounded best to me. It had a lot more mid range body to it without losing the ability to play with volume. All three great though. Pretty playing 👍
In my opinion, the buffet in live performance has a more expressive and charismatic sound. Recently, I've also come to enjoy the sound of Selmer; perhaps in live performance, the buffet sounds even more presentable, but it's not noticeable in recordings. Yanagisawa is a workhorse instrument for those who don't want to fuss around or search for something unusual; Yanagisawa is an excellent instrument.
Suppppppper... 🤔🤔🤔
The Selmer have a complex sort of "zing" to it, the Buffet have a brighter or more responsive core I think but less complex a sound.
I wondered which is your personal favourite?
Das Selmer Tenor klingt in diesem Vergleich am Wärmsten.
Only little sonic differences for the listeners. It appears that you felt most comfortable on the VI though.
Wie ich sehe, hast du die freie zeit gut genutzt 😄👍🏻
Ja genau Jan:-)
pode ser que há uma diferença no mecanismo de um para o outro.
agora para ouvir não percebi de diferença.
nelg ?