1: if you are rolling down just one side to evacuate the car, crack the front window on the other side, it will help to eliminate buffeting and allow smother evacuation out the back. 2: if they had modified the van to have the back actually be lower, or better yet, to wedge in the back (fast back) it would help the aerodynamics even more. the vortices/eddies in the back create a suction from the negative air pressure left behind the vehicle. this in effect "pulls" on the car in a rearward direction. the angles in the back pre aligns the air in a squeezing motion and lessens the size of wall being pulled on. 3. you can 100% tell this is being made in Cali. any more DEI and Tory wouldn't be allowed to be on it.
The name can be "Trying to copy Top Gear". They should have tried the JC, JM and RH successful trio. Instead they tried to copy the trio that already tried copying and failed. Almost identical to Matt LeBlanc, Rory Reid, and a female version of a hybrid Chris Evans / Andrew Flintoff.
they should have put the mirrors back on as i imagine it was them that was creating the turbulence along the top and sides of the van. :) and that van reminds me off all the custom jobs we did in the 80s.. and it looked good with them big fats on the back.. would love that van for myself.. though would put more work into the welding and bracing hehe
Just ask a smoker who smokes in their vehicle. To suck the ash & smoke out, there has to be 1 window cracked open & 1 window almost halfway down. A cross wind is also a factor.
Weird that they made a positive pressure windtunnel and not negative: if you suck all the turbulence is behind the tunnel and you suck mostly still air thru the straws. It makes it way more laminar.
I had a free phone app that uses pictures of an object to do the same thing as that guy with the needless dots... Only thing you'd need to do is put in the dimensions for the computer to make it.... And that's as easy as going to the cars actual dimensions and downsizing it proportionally.... Why so complicated and more expensive....
I have an honest question. Why does she have to be so theatrical with her looks. I personally don’t understand. Yes yes I understand I don’t have to. I have a myth, she could not “dress up” and still be the same person. PS not talking about Rose!
@@wingerdingit just screams ME ME ME ME I NEED TO BE THE CENTER OF ATTENTION!! LOOK AT ME NO ONE ELSE BUT ME ME!!! It just seems sad to me that someone thinks they have to go that far because they want to be seen. I have seen research papers that says it goes back to child hood, not enough attention.
1: if you are rolling down just one side to evacuate the car, crack the front window on the other side, it will help to eliminate buffeting and allow smother evacuation out the back.
2: if they had modified the van to have the back actually be lower, or better yet, to wedge in the back (fast back) it would help the aerodynamics even more. the vortices/eddies in the back create a suction from the negative air pressure left behind the vehicle. this in effect "pulls" on the car in a rearward direction. the angles in the back pre aligns the air in a squeezing motion and lessens the size of wall being pulled on.
3. you can 100% tell this is being made in Cali. any more DEI and Tory wouldn't be allowed to be on it.
They missed a trick not taking the van through another drive thru in the new state
They need a own channel named after the serie
The name can be "Trying to copy Top Gear". They should have tried the JC, JM and RH successful trio. Instead they tried to copy the trio that already tried copying and failed. Almost identical to Matt LeBlanc, Rory Reid, and a female version of a hybrid Chris Evans / Andrew Flintoff.
They should try the chopped van without the extra weight; I'm pretty sure that will get better acceleration.
they should have put the mirrors back on as i imagine it was them that was creating the turbulence along the top and sides of the van. :) and that van reminds me off all the custom jobs we did in the 80s.. and it looked good with them big fats on the back.. would love that van for myself.. though would put more work into the welding and bracing hehe
One of the most DEI shows on earth!!!
Whats that stand for?
@@wingerdingdiversity equity inclusion
lmao, imagine being mad that a trans woman is represented in entertainment
@@wingerding diversity, equity and inclusion
oh no not people that don't look like me, the horror! jfc
Wouldnt a reverse slant chop work best like a teardrop? Also they didnt try the sunroof. That was a good show
I kinda wish they also did a test without the extra weight
Just ask a smoker who smokes in their vehicle. To suck the ash & smoke out, there has to be 1 window cracked open & 1 window almost halfway down. A cross wind is also a factor.
cool
So are they going to explore different ways to stop a car with a stuck throttle after what happened with the van?
DAMN! he didn't call it a "flatus"!
Ah yes the familiar getting chauffeured in my Rolls and the pesky driver had eggs and beans again.
The bad welds are showing light like a skylight, more like a sky line 😅 you should weigh it after testing i bet you lost 30 pounds of rust 😊
The fart joke caught me off guard but gave me some info. I’m here for the chopped van. Respect to ROSE 🫡🫡
Tory you need to get Keri remember she destroyed a car with the mass of life. It was a duct tape myth
Weird that they made a positive pressure windtunnel and not negative: if you suck all the turbulence is behind the tunnel and you suck mostly still air thru the straws. It makes it way more laminar.
I was thinking the same thing. To get really smooth air you want a negative pressure wind tunnel.
missed putting mirrors back. this would have added drag as well. important miss.
You should of called the file dept for the mass of life
Its a green and pink porcupine
Tori you need to get Keri remember she destroyed a car with the mass of life it was a duct tape myth
Looks like a hot wheels need to do super yellow glass in the back and a metallic flake paint gold rims
ROSE…… has a thorn..
Thorns are pricky though, so that's you.
Expect 'petals' just get a 'prick'
I had a free phone app that uses pictures of an object to do the same thing as that guy with the needless dots...
Only thing you'd need to do is put in the dimensions for the computer to make it.... And that's as easy as going to the cars actual dimensions and downsizing it proportionally....
Why so complicated and more expensive....
What is this application called? I'm interested
This is Mythbusters with freaks.
That is definitely a dude.
Mom said if yar got nothing nice to say, say nothing. (Did i fail this?)
They "could" have used a nice smell.... they chose to use bottled STANK
This is still a decent program but the chemistry is missing completely.
I have an honest question. Why does she have to be so theatrical with her looks. I personally don’t understand. Yes yes I understand I don’t have to. I have a myth, she could not “dress up” and still be the same person. PS not talking about Rose!
I would imagine that's how they like to dress! But maybe I'm wrong.
@@wingerdingit just screams ME ME ME ME I NEED TO BE THE CENTER OF ATTENTION!! LOOK AT ME NO ONE ELSE BUT ME ME!!! It just seems sad to me that someone thinks they have to go that far because they want to be seen. I have seen research papers that says it goes back to child hood, not enough attention.