Work Resumes on the Orbital Launch Mount | Cape Canaveral Flyover

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 3 кві 2024
  • In this thrilling installment of NSF's Space Coast Flyover, join host Max Evans along with Adrian Beil and Alejandro Alcantarilla Romera for an aerial tour capturing the dramatic transformations and feverish activities at the world’s premier spaceport during March 2024. Dive deep into SpaceX’s unexpected maneuvers at LC-39A's Starship launch facility, witness the relentless launch cadence of Falcon 9, get a sneak peek into Blue Origin's New Glenn preparations, and marvel at Relativity's ambitious expansion for Terran R at LC-16. This episode is packed with insider insights, future speculations, and the latest developments from America's space hub. Don’t forget to share your theories in the comments - your guess about Starship's fate at LC-39A might just be the next big revelation!
    🔗 NSF Store: www.nasaspaceflight.com/shop/
    ⚡ Become a member of NASASpaceflight's channel for exclusive discord access, fast turnaround clips, and other exclusive benefits. Your support helps us continue our 24/7 coverage. Click JOIN above to get started.⚡
    🤵 Hosted by Max Evants (@_mgde_) with Adrian Beil (@BCCarCounters) and Alejandro Alcantarilla Romera (@AlexPhysics13)
    🖊️ Written by Harry Stranger and Alejandro Alcantarilla Romera.
    🎥 Video from Max Evans, Julia Bergeron, D Wise, Sean Doherty, Stephen Marr, SpaceX, NASA, Umbra SpaceSpace Coast Live, and Stephen Marr.
    ✂️ Edited by Sawyer Rosenstein (@thenasaman)
    💼 Produced by Kevin Michael Reed (@kmreed)
    🔍 If you are interested in using footage from this video, please review our content use policy: www.nasaspaceflight.com/conte...
    L2 Boca Chica (more clips and photos) from BC's very early days to today.
    🔗 forum.nasaspaceflight.com/ind...
    (Join L2 and support NSF here: www.nasaspaceflight.com/l2/)
    #SpaceX #BlueOrigin #RelativitySpace #NewGlenn #TerranR #Starship #Falcon9 #KennedySpaceCenter #SpaceCoast #RocketScience #SpaceExploration #LC39A #SpaceIndustry #AerospaceEngineering #NASA #Artemis
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 147

  • @LonghairGaming-cb4oe
    @LonghairGaming-cb4oe Місяць тому +27

    A new flyover is always great news, thanks to the NSF crew!

  • @OakeDoki
    @OakeDoki Місяць тому +13

    Cant wait to see this thing launch from the Florida beach. Absolute monster

    • @MomedicsChannel
      @MomedicsChannel Місяць тому +3

      Satellite Beach is gonna be the greatest spot on earth!!

    • @OakeDoki
      @OakeDoki Місяць тому +1

      @@MomedicsChannel oh you bet

  • @Lexington-Concord1775
    @Lexington-Concord1775 Місяць тому +1

    Thank you NSF team !

  • @corrinastanley125
    @corrinastanley125 Місяць тому +8

    Hosted by Max Evants lol, a rare typo in the wild. Thanks for the updates NSF team.

  • @DishNetworkDealerNEO
    @DishNetworkDealerNEO Місяць тому +21

    They waited for the orbital launch mount iterations to become more mature, before copying the one in Texas.

    • @wellkevi01
      @wellkevi01 Місяць тому +7

      That's the case with pretty much everything, because much like Starship, Starbase itself is also a prototype.

    • @imtired1696
      @imtired1696 Місяць тому +1

      If they waited, they wouldn't be demo-ing. Lol

  • @OliverTheSpaceNerd
    @OliverTheSpaceNerd Місяць тому +9

    Epic flyover!

    • @sander915
      @sander915 Місяць тому +2

      Nice to see you here! I'm subscribed to you!

  • @nathancommissariat3518
    @nathancommissariat3518 Місяць тому +1

    The Cape is great - thanks for the updates!

  • @photogeNK
    @photogeNK Місяць тому +4

    0:07
    The only reason I watch these videos 😂

  • @jack4socal
    @jack4socal Місяць тому +2

    Great coverage as always!

  • @JakeSilvester
    @JakeSilvester Місяць тому +1

    Great summary!great work!

  • @Pintuuuxo
    @Pintuuuxo Місяць тому +5

    It all went well because Alex knows numbers! 😊

  • @BusstterNutt
    @BusstterNutt Місяць тому +1

    Thank you, a great synopsis as always.

  • @bideford7099
    @bideford7099 Місяць тому +2

    Fantastic!

  • @PaulAmlin
    @PaulAmlin Місяць тому +1

    As a local close to the Cape, I really hope they move forward with the launch system for Starship.

  • @paulmoffat9306
    @paulmoffat9306 Місяць тому +9

    I suspect, they are re-designing the OLP and legs to accommodate a flame diverter that is aimed towards the sea.

    • @markl3893
      @markl3893 Місяць тому

      And beef-up the foundations for the taller, heavier ships yet to come.

  • @brianmartin6016
    @brianmartin6016 Місяць тому

    August this year is my guess on Starship launch at KSC. Thanks for the update!

  • @afmedwards
    @afmedwards Місяць тому

    5th Theory - Clear the tower for catch testing? SpaceX are short of space at Boca Chica, it will take a while to build OLM2 there, and they will fundamentally want to move boosters from test/launch at Boca Chica to production/launch in Florida. The tower is doing ‘nothing’ so could quickly be used to try catching for IFT5 perhaps.
    PS - alternative idea. They do catch tower at Boca Chica with OLM2, and never move last 2 sections there as only need shorter tower to catch boosters.

  • @davidmorgan5626
    @davidmorgan5626 Місяць тому +1

    Great info 👏🏻😊👍🏻🫶

  • @ScienceManiacCZ
    @ScienceManiacCZ Місяць тому +2

    If they were to build the giant flame diverter, would they not have to make changes to the tower? I think the diverter makes the most sense, I just think it would be too big a change with the tower already built.

  • @o0shad0oo
    @o0shad0oo Місяць тому

    You know, dropping the OLM down to ground level, while making it more difficult to handle launch thrust, would be the best way to handle the added length of Starship V3 without making launch tower construction an even bigger engineering challenge.

  • @MrKellymcilrath
    @MrKellymcilrath Місяць тому +3

    Great video Max, Adrian, & Alex. Very informative, Thank you!!

  • @Ittiz
    @Ittiz Місяць тому +4

    Perhaps they're going to move the Starship tower to SLC-37? I guess that option would fit between the bottom two?

    • @T_Mo271
      @T_Mo271 Місяць тому

      That seems a wise move.

  • @slateslavens
    @slateslavens Місяць тому +1

    lol, NSF used the pain scale faces :D

  • @SebastianWellsTL
    @SebastianWellsTL Місяць тому

    Epic!

  • @einb580
    @einb580 Місяць тому +1

    I personally believe Starship will land at KSC or Cape Canaveral before it launches from FL

  • @rgberry69
    @rgberry69 Місяць тому

    I suspect that the OLM legs were cut down as it was potentially decided that it would be easier/faster to install the required flame suppression, by removing the existing legs and concrete and starting that part again.

  • @casimir976
    @casimir976 Місяць тому +2

    Let’s go!!!

  • @-SpaceFrog-
    @-SpaceFrog- Місяць тому +5

    Finally. Idk how I feel about spacex building directly inside 39A

  • @samuelealessi234
    @samuelealessi234 Місяць тому +5

    Imo first Starship launch at the Cape will be in 2026

    • @Stereo3DProductions
      @Stereo3DProductions Місяць тому

      With the ongoing bankruptcy speedrun, I doubt this heavily.

    • @samuelealessi234
      @samuelealessi234 Місяць тому +2

      @@Stereo3DProductions What? You mean by spacex?

  • @Fantaman900
    @Fantaman900 Місяць тому +1

    To me it seems easier to mount the cooling plate and redo the foundation without the pillars in the way. Also the connection between foundation and pillars can be made better than the after alteration crater experience. A.K.A. You leave rebar sticking out for the next part. So they are rebuilding the mount from ground up.

  • @mgclark46
    @mgclark46 Місяць тому +1

    The higher they raise the mount, the less-robust and complex need-be the ground protection systems. Of course, Mechazilla would need to grow in accordance with any increased height of the mount. I think they will iterate-up in Florida while future iterations of MZ/Mount combos will go much higher.

  • @intheknow7659
    @intheknow7659 Місяць тому

    Would like to see the launch ring they use on the olm fixed to a flame trench.

  • @joaohenriqueneuhaus2023
    @joaohenriqueneuhaus2023 Місяць тому

    5:44 Go blue! (F Finally...) 😂

  • @ptolemythespacenerd
    @ptolemythespacenerd Місяць тому +1

    3:58 lol

  • @PaulBCAB
    @PaulBCAB Місяць тому +6

    Option5? SpaceX is supposedly taking over SLC 37 after the last Delta Flight. They use SLC 37 for Starship, build new OLM(s), move the tower from SLC39A and add new towers(s) at SLC37. This allows SLC 39A and SLC 40 to continue Falcon operations unimpeded by Starship activities and Starship Stage 0 construction to be unimpeded by Falcon operations.

    • @charleslord2433
      @charleslord2433 Місяць тому +4

      That's my guess also. NASA is still worried about LC-39a being taken out of commission by a Starship RUD

    • @T_Mo271
      @T_Mo271 Місяць тому

      I think this is most likely.

  • @Lion_McLionhead
    @Lion_McLionhead Місяць тому

    Wonder if the amount of armoring they had to do to starbase will make LC-39 completely unrecognizable.

  • @hoytarchery5302
    @hoytarchery5302 Місяць тому

    I live near kennady and I can tell you.... yes, this is is florida. But I swear we never get rain we get 1 rainy day once every 3 weeks it's crazy. I visited here growing up and it was once a day. But it never rains here.

  • @daveevans2527
    @daveevans2527 Місяць тому +1

    Watching the shock waves moving across the surface during launches at Boca Chica just screams for the need to use a big flame trench, pointed towards the ocean. I also think the ship will be spotted further from the tower. The tower avoidance maneuver is damaging the launch mount ring. I also expect a redesign of the ring mount. Bigger opening, top without any flat surfaces. There is no way the current ring will support daily launches, let alone several per day. Tower will also need to be stretched. Why build the current height when you know version 3 is coming? That only requires another module above the ship QD and below the longer chop sticks. Same for second launch complex at BC. SpaceX will soon have good flame trench experience with muliple Raptors at Massey site. World's biggest blow torch needs to be tamed. Current Boca design was a quick fix.

  • @Naultarous
    @Naultarous Місяць тому +4

    I'm leaning toward option 3. I think a newer version of water plate mixed with at least some sort of flame diverter. Think Masseys test site style of changes.

  • @djmistiso
    @djmistiso Місяць тому

    Woah… at the 2:02 mark, you can now actually see just how massive Starfactory truly is… 😳

  • @danielbrown1097
    @danielbrown1097 Місяць тому +1

    I drive by that helicopter on my way to Gator's Portside to watch the rocket launches and landings 🤔😎🍺🌴🚀

  • @Trex531
    @Trex531 Місяць тому

    Maybe they’ll keep the tower and construct kind of hill in order to have exhaust channels similar to the 39B SLS platform.

  • @Labertasche
    @Labertasche Місяць тому

    The Numbers bit by Alex xDD

  • @Madhuntr
    @Madhuntr Місяць тому +2

    I bet with the 3 launches so far Space x gathered enough Data that they decided to build a completely new OLM which will be tested at boca Chica first with the second Tower.
    When this new OLM und Tower are ready i bet they will demolish the first OLM too while continueing to Launch from the new OLM.
    Or the will completely demolish the full first Tower too and rebuild after at KSC

  • @Ch33ziTzsk8R
    @Ch33ziTzsk8R Місяць тому +1

    I’m sure it has to be something like tower needs to be researched, couple catches first before upgrades and the stretched version of starship v3 all integrated. Plus idk why they would build the tower sections in Florida, ship them to Texas, unless it’s all outdated and cape will be like some say the main launch site and boca will be just a test area…

  • @joshuadarochahillairaud7202
    @joshuadarochahillairaud7202 Місяць тому +1

    Yay

  • @jordanhenshaw
    @jordanhenshaw Місяць тому +1

    Yes. The reason BO so slow is for lack of big office buildings. That’s the problem. They clearly need more office buildings. Actually, while they’re at it, they should probably replace most of all the boring rockety mechanical stuff with even more office buildings.

    • @pinkmouse4863
      @pinkmouse4863 Місяць тому +1

      ...And car parks. Don't forget the car parks.

    • @eichelbergergary
      @eichelbergergary Місяць тому

      you missed the memo. they are pumping out rocket stages now and ramping up Orbital Reef, which will be built here as well. The need for more parking speaks volumes.

  • @nicodatto
    @nicodatto Місяць тому

    What is the best place to watch a Falcon 9 launch? Thank you

  • @paulsessions9751
    @paulsessions9751 Місяць тому +1

    “Peace out Girl Scouts” has been added to my dictionary

  • @gregsmith1116
    @gregsmith1116 Місяць тому +2

    Starship will launch from the Florida space coast in 2026/2027 timeframe. Probably.

  • @halkrohn9530
    @halkrohn9530 Місяць тому +2

    I'm not a pessimist but... I think they're going to take the whole thing down and relocate that tower elsewhere.

  • @ianPedlar
    @ianPedlar Місяць тому

    Yeah the whole deluge thing is fun 'n that but remember the old adage:
    Bury the sound underground.

  • @Ron4885
    @Ron4885 Місяць тому

    Alex, Heat shield tiles. . . Yum 😋 😂🤣 P.S. I would try the slide. 🤪

  • @ohedd
    @ohedd Місяць тому

    They're changing the OLM at 39A and putting in a flame trench

  • @Saberbelt
    @Saberbelt Місяць тому

    Flame Trench, doubtful but possible

  • @Chickenlegs836
    @Chickenlegs836 Місяць тому +1

    As efficient as Space X is why would they build legs & then demo?? It’s the million $$$ ? we will have to wait & see what happens? NSF YOU GUYS ROCKET!!

  • @romec3435
    @romec3435 Місяць тому +1

    👏👏🖖

  • @UserName-vf8rw
    @UserName-vf8rw Місяць тому

    Olm ring goes to starbase. Complete new design at 39

  • @mikapeltokorpi7671
    @mikapeltokorpi7671 Місяць тому

    Looks like OML is still made of a normal steel; "heat treating" will eventually cause structural failure. I was wondering about the tear patterns on the panels in the aftermath videos and images. Now I know.

  • @proesterchen
    @proesterchen Місяць тому +2

    OLM goes *pooof*

  • @JackFrost-rg3wv
    @JackFrost-rg3wv Місяць тому +1

    I love Alex's voice

  • @HelloKittyFanMan
    @HelloKittyFanMan Місяць тому

    I bet those things are what they are even if we _don't_ remember.

  • @TheCritterWindow
    @TheCritterWindow Місяць тому +1

    The new star base tower will make the first catch attempts.

  • @romec3435
    @romec3435 Місяць тому +1

    👀🚀👍

  • @michelvan97
    @michelvan97 Місяць тому +3

    My theory is that they shut down Starship launch site at 39A and move the Tower to new site, once SpaceX get old Delta IV launch Pad in there hands.

    • @johnmoruzzi7236
      @johnmoruzzi7236 Місяць тому +2

      Yes I’d go for that too…. Crazy to put it next to 39A’s critical NASA and DoD Falcon launch pad, there’s a new service tower coming for NSSL Falcon Heavy missions….

    • @michelvan97
      @michelvan97 Місяць тому +1

      I suspect after Rocktornado of IFT-1, NASA got cold feet about OLM so close at LC- 39a
      Now that SLC 37B goes inactive after NROL-70, there allot space free from SLC 34 up to SLC-40, what is used by SpaceX

  • @jens0107
    @jens0107 Місяць тому

    I think the launch tower at LC39A was scrapped in favour to take over LC36 after the final Delta4heavy launch.

    • @erikruser6047
      @erikruser6047 Місяць тому +1

      I assume you mean LC37. LC36 is Blue Origin's spot at the south end of the cape. But I agree this option seems very likely. Having 2 separate sets of launch infrastructure shoehorned into the same LC always seemed odd to me.

    • @jens0107
      @jens0107 Місяць тому

      You are right, my fault. LC36 will hopefully used for a long time by Blue Origin.

    • @T_Mo271
      @T_Mo271 Місяць тому

      @@jens0107 And maybe they'll launch a rocket from there one day.

    • @ale131296
      @ale131296 Місяць тому

      SLC-37 is as an addition not a replacement of 39A

  • @olegoathiking1962
    @olegoathiking1962 Місяць тому +5

    I think SpaceX will take over the soon to be retired ULA pad and completely abandon 39A for Starship launches (for now).

  • @citizenblue
    @citizenblue Місяць тому +3

    The best launch Mount is no launch mount😂

  • @peetky8645
    @peetky8645 Місяць тому +2

    flame diverter

  • @Tommork-bq6ms
    @Tommork-bq6ms Місяць тому

    Good idea...
    Don't proceed
    Wait till Boca Chica can do two maybe three or four unscathed...

  • @GonkDroid0923
    @GonkDroid0923 Місяць тому +2

    Im thinking Space X is moving the starship pad altogether, as 39A is a historical structure. With the damage dont to the concrete during the first Starship Launch, I can them having to move the pad as to not damage 39A.

    • @T_Mo271
      @T_Mo271 Місяць тому

      It's both historic (which NASA doesn't care much about) and also operationally important for current programs.

  • @G09534
    @G09534 Місяць тому +1

    I am waiting for the day when Alex mature himself and I will be able to enjoy his presentations

  • @flyingarts6765
    @flyingarts6765 Місяць тому

    What do you think of a Russian style OLM that opens up like a flower thus moving its parts away from the massive flame.

  • @johnburr9463
    @johnburr9463 Місяць тому

    They're just inserting the diverter.

  • @stevedunford7632
    @stevedunford7632 Місяць тому +2

    I see two factors for the OLM.
    1. The impact/delays its use will have on Falcon launches.
    2. The risk launch or recovery presents to the Falcon facility.
    On that basis I would not be surprised if the tower gets dismantled and moved to another pad.
    If Elons plans come together he is going to need a launch site with a tank farm large enough to support several OLMs.
    I also see a need for the farm to be filled from tanker ships at an adjacent jetty.

  • @gabrielkapili4398
    @gabrielkapili4398 Місяць тому

    I like 3🎉

  • @ianPedlar
    @ianPedlar Місяць тому

    Why d'ya wanna launch Maidens into space? 5:20

  • @dissaid
    @dissaid Місяць тому

    😎😎😎

  • @landonmalvich8475
    @landonmalvich8475 Місяць тому

    The same thing, but different!

  • @dphuntsman
    @dphuntsman Місяць тому

    Can’t believe some of the snarky comments here. Ease up, enjoy, and learn, folks! - Dave Huntsman

  • @denniskatinas
    @denniskatinas Місяць тому

    Pole shift needs attention.

  • @MrH786
    @MrH786 Місяць тому

    Next launch 4/20. 🙂

  • @HelloKittyFanMan
    @HelloKittyFanMan Місяць тому

    "Also... as well"? Oops.

  • @JoeDaManTheHC
    @JoeDaManTheHC Місяць тому +1

    👀🐔👀🐔😁

  • @paulbond3790
    @paulbond3790 Місяць тому +1

    Let’s get a launch tower with an OLM over a flame trench… JUST DO IT!

  • @jamescobban857
    @jamescobban857 Місяць тому

    SpaceX launched a record FOURTEEN times in March: 13 Falcon 9s and one Starship.

    • @ale131296
      @ale131296 Місяць тому +3

      Thirteen. 12 Falcon 9s, 1 Starship.

    • @jamescobban857
      @jamescobban857 Місяць тому

      @@ale131296 I did my math wrong. Still a record.

  • @swissyodelbear
    @swissyodelbear Місяць тому

    nice, AIR METH0DS egg beater......neat

  • @Feszy_
    @Feszy_ Місяць тому +1

    I never understood why they wanted to put a starship tower in SLC-39A. It's already a busy pad and I don't see how the existing GSE is compatible.
    I also imagine that by the time they get catching a booster or ship down the tower will be redesigned.
    And if you missed a booster catch your potentially blowing up two pads at the same time.
    I think option 4: The tower is going to be scrapped. The most likely

  • @avgjoe5969
    @avgjoe5969 Місяць тому

    Not surprising that they resumed work at LC-39a Starship tower. The starship tower was unusable as NASA wouldn't risk an accident to nearby (1000 ft) LC-39a tower that launches humans to ISS. It was the Only such tower until Spacex launched astronauts at SLC-40. So now its clear to launch when ready and needs to be finished. New excuses may come, but I think they can use it before the year's out.

  • @melissawhite8766
    @melissawhite8766 Місяць тому +3

    Click baited....olm at Canaveral...phew

    • @LPAmdee
      @LPAmdee Місяць тому +2

      The Thumbnail says Cape. The Title says Cape Caneveral Flyover, and its the OLM at the Cape.

    • @melissawhite8766
      @melissawhite8766 Місяць тому +1

      @@LPAmdee it is not necessarily a bad thing. "Goodbye OLM" is all I saw at a glance, so I clicked. That's why any UA-camr worth their salt puts provoking thumbnails, to generate click, which supports the content we love. NSF is amazing!

  • @ElitePhotobox
    @ElitePhotobox Місяць тому +1

    longer legs at launch site to reduce the ground being damaged !

  • @danielbuck2430
    @danielbuck2430 Місяць тому +1

    Great video. need to STOP "peace out girl scouts"!

  • @niklas6576
    @niklas6576 Місяць тому

    Please get Alex a decent microphone, this is a sore spot in the otherwise amazing quality of your videos!

    • @ale131296
      @ale131296 Місяць тому

      This is already a decent microphone, I don't have the budget to buy a several thousand mic

  • @novembern939nn5
    @novembern939nn5 Місяць тому

    What about an unstable foundation on 39A causing the legs be removed?

  • @Mmaddendrew
    @Mmaddendrew Місяць тому

    ULA Delta Heavy Pad will be returned to the Nasa Military Force and possibly purchased by Elon musk for Starship.

    • @ale131296
      @ale131296 Місяць тому

      Launchpads are not purchased, they're leased.

  • @jameswilson5165
    @jameswilson5165 Місяць тому

    2026

  • @allanrose3661
    @allanrose3661 Місяць тому

    When SpaceX does things on "Elon Time" they end up wasting time and have to start over. LOL.

  • @deuce2669
    @deuce2669 Місяць тому

    Sounds kind of silly, but what if they are taking the legs to Starbase? Have we seen hardware for them there yet?

    • @ale131296
      @ale131296 Місяць тому +3

      Considering they're filled with concrete and that they were literally cut and torn down that's unlikely

    • @deuce2669
      @deuce2669 Місяць тому

      @@ale131296 unless they never filled these! But yeah, I forgot about the concrete cream filling 😅

    • @ale131296
      @ale131296 Місяць тому +3

      @@deuce2669 they were at least partially filled from what we could see on the SpaceX live feeds of launches from 39A

  • @DeneF
    @DeneF Місяць тому

    'parking garage'. Why does American English often use two words where one will work? Lol

    • @T_Mo271
      @T_Mo271 Місяць тому

      Because there is more than one type of garage in American english.

  • @plus1727
    @plus1727 Місяць тому +1

    Demolished...new Marvel hero.